Boston, Massachusetts ODAR Office

At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Boston, Massachusetts, 14 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Boston, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 11.0 months. The average case processing time in Boston is 344 days.The Boston average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 44%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Boston ODAR office was last updated on 3/10/2014.

SSA, Boston ODAR Office
One Bowdoin Square, 4th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02114
View Map
Phone: (888) 870-7573 -- Fax: (617) 248-0978
eFile Fax: (617) 742-1871 (For sending evidence)

OfficeJudgesAvg. Hearing
Wait Time
Average
Processing Time
Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ
Cases
Dismissed
Cases
Approved
Cases
Denied
Boston 14 11.0 months 344 days 2.0 22% 44% 33%
Massachusetts11.5 months375 days2.120%45%35%
National Average:11.7 months389 days1.919%44%37%
Hearing Wait Time: 11.00 months
Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ 1.97
Average Processing Time 344 days
Cases Pending 5366
Dispositions 2676
New Cases 2737
Hearings In Person 90%
Video Hearings 10%

Comments about Judges at the Boston Massachusetts ODAR office:

To leave your own comment, select a judge from the list above and leave a comment on that judge's page.

Judge: Joel F Gardiner
Date Posted: 11/30/2013 9:32:27 AM
Submited By:



I went before this judge in summer of 2013, as I enter the courtroom I got a very weird look from this judge,when I stated my age 48 he became very negative. now I have had a few injuries including 2 disc herniations in my lower back 2 disks in my neck which now I have no feeling in my r foot along with sciatic nerve issues running from my back down to my leg into my foot. ive been to 3 doctors in the boston spine groupe. few years later I had a heart attak and a stent operation was done,, then I tore my rot cuff and no longer have strength in my right arm or hand. ive been to several doctors for these conditions and I am on medication. long story short this judge did not review all my doctors and the ones he did he twisted the stories around and .he said because of my age I am still able to work,one example of his explanation,, he is not to lift anything over 5 lbs push pull grasp and no working above shoulder height,, he has also spine impingement nerve damage etc etc.. then goes on to tell me im only in my 40s and to him I don't look like im in any pain,, then has a vocational expert telling him I can go back to work doing automotive work,, and according to 2010 stats there are thousands of positions available,, ahh hello this is 2013 and I cannot bend stretch push pull or grasp,, to me this judge was full of personal attacks due my age,, very negative and very unfair,, when I got my unfavorable decision he had twisted the explanations around did not look at all my doctors records that say not able to work due to conditions.. imo this judge should be fired. I did not ask for these injuries this was the deck I was handed and now have to deal with them for the rest of my life,, thanks judge for being so negative and full of personal attacks because of my age..so now I am no longer insured and cannot collect the money I had paid in to ss. so what do they do with all the money people pay in and cannot collect??? I honestly don't know how this narrow minded judge can sleep at night. and yes this is called freedom of speech,, or did they take my rights away too..

Judge: Daniel J Driscoll
Date Posted: 10/21/2013 7:39:14 PM
Submited By:



Judge Driscoll was thorough in his questioning and what I believe is apparent fairness as described by my husband. We are not sure it was approved yet and we will wait for his decision. My husband was very confused about himself yet the judge allowed my husband to try and compose himself many times during the hearing. No matter how the decision turns out my husband said the man was doing his job the best he can do. Our attorney said he believed the case was approved. We can only wait to find out if it actually was. God bless these judges that have to make these very difficult decisions regardless of how they rule.

Judge: William Ramsey
Date Posted: 9/30/2013 12:38:24 PM
Submited By: nicole



This judge didn't even look at all my medical I could barely walk and still denied me....HORRIBLE

Judge: Barry H Best
Date Posted: 7/1/2013 1:16:29 PM
Submited By:



Just received a denial letter from judge Best. I feel as though he ignored all the strong evidence presented by my self and my doctors and based his decision solely on the SSA doctors who saw me. A typical denier judge!

Judge: Rebekah Ross
Date Posted: 4/12/2013 6:23:34 PM
Submited By: nylg yort



found judge ross very open and helpful.

Judge: Paul M Murphy
Date Posted: 4/8/2013 8:51:19 AM
Submited By:



Despite overwhelming evidence of a heart condition that cannot be treated with meds due to other health problems I was denied. I think he is a nice man,but he just doesn't understand difficult and hard to diagnose cases. I am still waiting on an appeal from his decision meanwhile I have no help or assistance of any kind I will be living out of my car soon!!!!!!! Even if he can't understand what my life is like with my heart problems I have to everyday and wonder why he made that bad decision...

Judge: Matthew G Levin
Date Posted: 2/14/2013 8:06:51 PM
Submited By:



Horrible. Takes everything negative and ignores the good. Seriously an idiot and doesn't know how to use spell check. I hate him

Judge: Barry H Best
Date Posted: 1/8/2013 4:38:17 PM
Submited By:



Went to my hearing and He stated He wanted to do a continuance to have a DR present to review the medical documents. I am not sure what this means but He appeared to be nice. Started crying a bit when talking about my problems and He did not try to rush me. Took a few breaths then continued. He was not rude to me at all. Even when I did not understand the question and spoke of something completly different. Seemed to show sympathy and not rush me, unlike the hersay of most Judges doing this when someone becomes upset or emotional.

Judge: William Ramsey
Date Posted: 12/11/2012 5:39:24 PM
Submited By:



The person above me is being unfair, you were denied plain and simple because you missed your appointment, this judge doesn't approve of that type of behavior. I was told from the beginning that if I missed any appointments that he would dismiss my case. He is the head judge, a very fair man who made me feel comfortable. I received a favorable decision with a different onset date, but he really helped my case and would have received it from the onset date if I had sent him the proper paperwork, it was an oversight on my part, I cannot blame Judge Ramsey. I thank him and I know he has a low rating as far as approvals go, but he sort of sees right through the bologna. You can always appeal your decision from him. I'm very satisfied with his decision and thank him for making me feel comfortable in his courtroom and being a very decent human being as well as his staff. My suggestion would be, be prepared, don't be dishonest and have medical documentations to back up your claims. He wants to see that you are following through with your treatment, otherwise he has to follow the law. Would I have liked a fully favorable decision, of course, but why would I begrudge a man doing his job because of my errors?

Judge: William Ramsey
Date Posted: 12/4/2012 8:50:28 AM
Submited By: John



I just got home from my hearing. I wasn't denied and I didn't get a bench decision but I found the judge to be very fair and thorough. He asked the important questions and did his due diligence in finding the facts out. It lasted about an hour. I was with my attorney. She hit it out of the park. The vocational expert had his questions and a few jobs that I could do in his opinion. It's just the process. Either way, approval or denial, I was satisfied. I can always appeal. My case was strong and had years of documented surgery and Doctors opinions that favored me getting SSI. Nothing in this world is guaranteed. You have to work on it and get an attorney and cough up a couple grand of your money. It's not the judge, it's you. If you were denied you're case wasn't strong. Point blank.

Judge: William Ramsey
Date Posted: 12/1/2012 11:01:28 AM
Submited By:



Although this particular judge heard me out and asked really good questions and made me feel very comfortable, at the same time he looked as though he was just speeding through my case. I had 12 years of paper work proving my case from a few doctors, amazing letters from my therapist and psychiatrist, DSS records and school records riddled with abuse- denied. The part I think that made it even more obvious that this judge WRONGFULLY denied me was that my particular disability that I have documentation of, 12-13 years of proof, and present day as well, I was actually a SSDI RECIPIENT FOR 4 YEARS FROM 14-18yrs old!!!!!! I only stopped recieving because of my disability, I was homeless and jobless and didnt keep my review appointment with the psychiatrist, who left 5 minutes early I later found out!!!! COMPLETE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO HAVE PAID INTO THESE BENEFITS ARE OUT HERE SUFFERING.

Judge: Constance D Carter
Date Posted: 11/18/2012 2:17:17 PM
Submited By: Richard



Judge C.Carter has a low approval rating. It is not the lowest but it is low in comparison to others. I found her to be objective and probing. I found her to be receptive to accurate honesty. I had to settle for a later on-set date but I fault primary care for that.

Judge: Martha R Reeves
Date Posted: 9/17/2012 11:51:19 AM
Submited By:



Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.

Judge: J. Alan Mackay
Date Posted: 7/30/2012 1:23:29 PM
Submited By:



I have had ALJ MacKay twice in the past month. He is a stickler on the 5 day rule and will not accept evidence submitted after the 5 days. Period. However, he awarded both cases, one 45 year old with chronic pain and one 54 year old whose past relevant was heavy and whose cardiac impairment limited him to sedentary/light work

Judge: J. Alan Mackay
Date Posted: 7/26/2012 8:55:25 PM
Submited By:



I have had judge Mackay on two cases, one I won which should never had made it to a law judge as the client was very Ill One I lost that although the Meds did not support the client I knew the client and her problems Personally as she became a friend of the family. I knew it was a long shot but I thought the judge would see she was really truthful and was in need Of these benefits. I think these judges have to realize that most of my brothers and sisters turn away many people we feel don't deserve SSDI but when we bring a client we put a lot of work into their cases and when we loose we suffer as we end up working for months for nothing and that Hurts we do not get a weekly check the cases we bring to you we believe in

Judge: Maria Alexander Nunez
Date Posted: 7/3/2012 2:51:58 PM
Submited By: Danieel



You can always tell an expert! Thanks for contritbuing.

Judge: Stephen C Fulton
Date Posted: 7/3/2012 2:42:25 PM
Submited By: John



A kangaroo court

Judge: Sean Teehan
Date Posted: 6/26/2012 3:23:43 PM
Submited By:



I was before him recently. I had the impression that he did not approach my case objectively, but was looking for a justification to deny it. When he asked the employment specialist if I was capable of certain work requirements, he misstated what I had told him - under oath - and what was in my medical record. I've been told by two lawyers, unconnected with each other, that Teehan has the reputation of being harsh and biased. Why have his approvals dropped so dramatically in the last two years? Look at the statistics below.

Judge: Matthew Levin
Date Posted: 3/25/2012 10:36:05 PM
Submited By: