Tacoma, Washington ODAR Office

At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Tacoma, Washington, 13 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Tacoma, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 11.0 months. The average case processing time in Tacoma is 365 days.The Tacoma average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 47%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Tacoma ODAR office was last updated on 4/8/2014.

SSA, Tacoma ODAR Office
2413 Pacific Avenue, Suite 200
Tacoma, Washington 98402
View Map
Phone: (888) 208-4640 -- Fax: (253) 272-0143
eFile Fax: (877) 313-4919 (For sending evidence)

OfficeJudgesAvg. Hearing
Wait Time
Average
Processing Time
Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ
Cases
Dismissed
Cases
Approved
Cases
Denied
Tacoma 13 11.0 months 365 days 1.6 23% 47% 30%
Washington11.7 months383 days1.822%41%37%
National Average:11.9 months392 days2.019%44%38%
Hearing Wait Time: 11.00 months
Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ 1.64
Average Processing Time 365 days
Cases Pending 4170
Dispositions 1816
New Cases 2027
Hearings In Person 90%
Video Hearings 10%

Comments about Judges at the Tacoma Washington ODAR office:

To leave your own comment, select a judge from the list above and leave a comment on that judge's page.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 4/23/2014 3:37:51 PM
Submited By: Dallas Wittgenfeld



"Judge" Dan R. Hyatt suspended by Social Security Administration for attacking two more people at SS Court. 4 years ago, he attacked a lawyer on crutches using his chest to strike the lawyer twice. This time, Dan R. Hyatt used his hand and smartly slapped two female coworkers on the fanny at ODAR in Portland Oregon. Last month, another restraining order was issued against him by a Washington County Court in Oregon. Now, the Court for federal workers says, "On June 12, 2013 [Social Security Administration] proposed to suspend Dan R. Hyatt for "touching two female coworkers on "Several separate occasions." Dan R. Hyatt did not contest the facts nor the proposed punishment of 2 days suspension. Recently, his appeal to overturn the default judgment against him for buttock touching was denied. http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=1005041&version=1008934&application=ACROBAT

Judge: Scott R Morris
Date Posted: 4/19/2014 10:22:09 AM
Submited By: Carolyn



THESE JUDGES BETTER THINK LONG AND HARD BEFORE CONTINUING TO DENY VALID MENTAL HEALTH CASES SO QUICKLY THESE DAYS. THERE'S AN UNPRECEDENTED NEW AMOUNT OF UNSTABLE INDIVIDUALS ON THE NEWS EVERY NIGHT, FOR DOING SOMETHING HORRENDOUS BECAUSE OF THEIR MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES. MANY OF THEM WERE DENIED SSI. AS A CITIZEN WITH CHILDREN THIS WORRIES ME. WE AS A COMMUNITY NEED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE WITH MENTAL ILLNESSES ARE PLACED ON SSI, TREATED PROPERLY, THEN EXAMINED PERIODICALLY.

Judge: David J DeLaittre
Date Posted: 2/27/2014 9:04:31 PM
Submited By: Brenda Mccormick



A very kind, caring and knowledgeable Judge.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/8/2014 5:06:30 PM
Submited By: retired veteran



Another Bernath Sock-puppet raging on Judge Hyatt's comments page. It diesnt matter Bernath, you have been barred from being a representative by Social Security because of over 50 examples of misconduct with the courts and dealing with clients. Probably cashing and taking their settlement checks like you did in California. You cant even get licensed by the Oregon bar because they refuse to give you one because of your record as a thief and liar in Ca.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/3/2014 1:49:49 PM
Submited By:



I used MR. Bernath to fight for me in receiving SSDI. With his kind help I was Awarded SSDI in the shortest time possible. I actually had SSDI check in my hand 6 months after my very first phone call to the BEST and most honest attorney in Oregon-Daniel A. Bernath. I fired Schnieder in a work comp case, they won't work for you but for themselves. Use Bernath, call him and you talk to HIM e mail him and he'll respond that day or the next, just emailed him on a Sunday, he responded the same day.......a half hour later. What other attorney in the U.S. would do that? He is with out a doubt "the" Attorney for SSDI. TFS

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 1/18/2014 3:09:49 PM
Submited By: Retired Veteran



Reading through these comments it is very apparent that The Judge's page has been "spammed" with negative comments. This is probably the action of one Daniel A Bernath, a shady "attorney" who was denied clearance to practice state law by the Oregon Bar due to "low moral Character" while an attorney while a member of the California State Bar, due to failure to support his children, forging and cashing his clients checks without their knowledge and destroying his legal files. This same Bernath crashed his private plane due to him not putting gas in it, and is now trying to sue several companies for millions of dollars because " he wasn't informed" that the plane could have problems with little or no fuel. He has published a long boring list of accomplishments that are emblellished or unverifible. He claims to be a 90% disabled PTSD from Vietnam, while his service consisted of being a photographer aboard a ship. He photo shopped his face on the picture of a Navy Chief Petty Officer and says he was made an "honorary CPO" when that title can only be given by the US Navy. In summarizing I am posting this to simply ask that the people who want a review of Judge Hyatt disregard the negative posts by Bernath and his sock-puppets. A simple google search will link you to news articles that give a balanced account of the interaction between Bernath and Judge Hyatt. As a side note I am also a retired veteran who draws a 100% VA pension and SSDI, so I understand the concerns of anyone going through the process.

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 1/15/2014 10:29:32 PM
Submited By: AngelaK



Before my hearing last month, I made the mistake of coming on here and reading these reviews. My panic attacks started increasing the closer it got to my hearing date. After a childhood and life of being abused, I thought, I can't take one more person being cruel to me. I had a vision of a horrible person in my head. I was expecting the worse. I was shaking, scared of what I was about to have to talk about, and scared to death of this judge. But yet he was kind to me. I felt like he was genuinely interested in what I had experienced as a kid, and what it has left me dealing with on a day to day basis. Not one time did he make me feel bad, belittle me or do anything that is stated here. The first words he said to me where, "I can see you are really nervous, and I want you to know it's going to be okay." I won't ever forget that he said that to me. He did dig into my life big time, but I felt like he needed to, not only to understand me, but to understand what I have experienced and how it affects me each day. I honestly felt compassion from him, and maybe that's because I was horribly abused as a child, and he could connect with that somehow. I obviously don't know him personally, so I can only guess. But I had to come on here and say my piece, because I appreciated that he was kind to me. At one point, I broke down sobbing, and they even got me some water to drink. My honest opinion/feeling is that Judge Gilbert's no nonsense approach may be misinterpreted as meanness. All I can say is that my personal experience with him, I did not see this mean person that everyone has talked about here. I experienced a judge who had taken the time to read my case, and find out who I was and what had happened to me as a kid. I appreciated that in itself. I have not received my decision yet, and no matter what it is, I still stand by what my experience was. I also have a rule that I don't write bad reviews online about anyone. There's enough meanness in the world without me adding to it.

Judge: Joanne E Dantonio
Date Posted: 1/2/2014 9:38:52 AM
Submited By:



I waited from 1999 to 2011 to have my story finally heard, & when I received my paperwork I cried for over a week straight. She not only turned info about me into bold face lies, but also based my entire 12yr struggle on a Drs opinion that I saw one time! I've had to live in poverty, since my disease makes having kids a huge problem, but if I would have had them if be able to receive benefits. Me attending college & being misdiagnosed for 5yrs cost me everything. I think she's extremely unkind, uncaring, & doesn't take each case into consideration. She saw a young woman, who doesn't look disabled, & wrote up a denial letter that only the most heartless person could ever write. She's the reason I will remain w/out finances to even purchase my 8 meds monthly.

Judge: Cynthia D Rosa
Date Posted: 12/18/2013 9:00:39 AM
Submited By:



she is being investigated because she hasnt done her job properly since transferring. she really messed up my wifes life but we got it finally. shes dirty and just denied or dismisses everyone without caring

Judge: Scott R Morris
Date Posted: 8/14/2013 10:25:27 AM
Submited By:



The judge made a point from the onset of the hearing to ensure comfortable and open dialogue. He researched our situation and respected our intentions for the hearing. He gave us a list of items he wished to see before he would make a final decision. His willingness to hold off on making a final determination until all fact were reviewed, ensured that his final determination was accurate and fair.

Judge: Robert P Kingsley
Date Posted: 5/25/2013 12:18:09 PM
Submited By:



This judge very unfair very political he did nit like my attorney and he carried it through the whole trialnand in to my denial I ave seven out of nine qualifiers for social security but got denied I am now going higher up and file complaints against him he gets no stars

Judge: Rebekah Ross
Date Posted: 4/12/2013 6:23:34 PM
Submited By: nylg yort



found judge ross very open and helpful.

Judge: David J DeLaittre
Date Posted: 4/12/2013 8:05:41 AM
Submited By:



Judge means well, however, in the end he still has no control over disability. They don't care what he does or says. Federal judges have the final say, I don't think so. Very disappointed, his failure to stand his ground or hold his authority, whatever, cost us everything.

Judge: Scott R Morris
Date Posted: 3/18/2013 8:47:47 PM
Submited By:



He struck me as a very fair person when I spoke to him.

Judge: David Johnson
Date Posted: 3/6/2013 10:22:41 PM
Submited By: Kenneth Laporte



My Hearing was on 12/21/2012. The Court completely ignored medical records submitted after the Hearing (by extension of time) from a major stroke incident which would prove that the claim was within the time limits required and ignored extensive medical records from the Veterans Administration claiming that they did not receive them even though my attorney provided me with proof that not only were they sent, but also received by the office. The VA records show that the claimant has: Aortic Valve Disease, chronic PTSD (from the Vietnam war and from another source), Tachycardia, Sinus Nerve, Injury to the peroneal nerve, uncontrollable Hypertension, Inververtebral Disk Desease, Depressive Disorder, and is partially paralysed. Any one of these would result in a disability award except the Judge decided that he wanted to dwell of the Claimants recently deceased life partner of 32 years with questions about homosexual issues such as what illnesses my partner had. A detailed appeal was made to the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and the claimant has requested a copy of the audio transcript however thus far they seem to be avoiding providing that to me. This tranascript is needed for a future Federal Lawsuit against the Social Security Administration as this current appeal is the last required stop before being permitted to file in the Court. Is there a personal Judge bias here or just how disabled do you need to be to claim?

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 3/6/2013 5:31:00 PM
Submited By:



Well, the good news about losing a case is that you have one more appeal then you get to cost the U.S. Government big money as you take your case to Federal Court. I would recomend that those doing so carefully review the transcript and also get an audio copy. If you can prove malice, you can get the sky's the limit money when you sue. I have known that some of these Judges disregard medical reports and statements without providing an opposing professional opinion. Nice kangeroo court tactic.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/11/2013 8:48:22 AM
Submited By:



Hey Dan. Remember when you threw my disabled client and I out of the Disney style SSA "courtroom" and you said to me "haa haa. So what are you going to do about it?" This.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/6/2013 2:47:21 PM
Submited By:



Dan R Hyatt, admin law judge attacks helpless lawyer on crutches. Sworn declaration for Restraining Order issued against Dan R Hyatt. During my hearing on March 31, 2010 the administrative law judge wore a black robe and sat elevated from me. The judge was Riley Atkins and he had curly black hair. 2. He said to my lawyer “this is a case only about whether or not the time period is up and extension. I rule that she is past that time and therefore I will rule against her. As that is the only thing we are here for I will not take evidence about her disability.” 3. My lawyer said, “Wait, let’s not go so fast. Let me see the Notice. I didn’t get a copy” 4. Atkins said, “You had the chance to look at it before. Did you make an appointment to come and see the file?” 5. My lawyer said, “No, let me look at it now.” 6. Atkins then handed it to my lawyer (by handing it first to the vocational expert). 7. After my lawyer read of the file and his long discussion with the judge my lawyer turned to me and said, “claimant…” 8. The judge interrupted my lawyer and said, “Show some decorum. Her name is Mrs. Johnston.” My lawyer said that he was making the record clear after the long discussion with the judge so the record would know that he has stopped talking to the judge and was now talking to me, the Claimant. 9. My lawyer read to himself, the Notice and my Request for Hearing before an ALJ. He then asked me some questions and then the ALJ interrupted him again to stop him before my lawyer could complete what he was doing. 10. My lawyer said that he was not “going to close any doors” and that he believed that because of my mental condition that there was “good cause” to extend any deadlines and to deem the Request for Hearing to be a new application at the very least. (That was what I believed I had been doing when I wrote the Request for a Hearing-requesting a new application). 11. My lawyer refused to give up any of my rights and demanded that I be approved to be back on disability today. 12. The judge said the case wasn’t “worked up” and some other things. 13. The judge then said to me, “madam you have to go to the field office and file a new application.” 14. My lawyer said, “She should take advice from her lawyer and not from the guy who is throwing her out of court.” 15. Atkins then said, “Ma’am you should file a new application in Beaverton…” 16. My lawyer then said “Don’t give my client legal advise. I’ve already instructed you on that once. It isn’t your role.” 17. At all times my lawyer acted calm, professional and civil. If he didn’t act that way then I would have had to flee him (because of my severe mental illness). My lawyer acted calm, quiet, professional and civil at all times and that was how I could attend the stressful hearing. 18. My lawyer was not loud or argumentative. He made his objection heard and then made it again as I expect a lawyer to do in a courtroom setting. 19. My lawyer at no time was threatening or intimidating. 20. I then went into the lobby of ODAR with my lawyer where my husband was sitting. My lawyer Daniel A. Bernath looked at my husband and I and said, “let’s get out of here and we’ll talk outside.” 21. Dan then led the way, holding his black cane/crutch in his right hand, pulling his big box of books with wheels with his right hand and wearing a homburg hat. He was looking very dashing. 22. Dan was leading. My husband was following him and I was following my husband when we turned the corner to the elevator lobby of the 4th floor. 23. I saw an old short man wearing a brown colored outfit in blue jeans with silver hair already inside an elevator. Except for him the elevator was empty. 24. When we approached the elevator to get in, the old man quickly ran forward from the back of the elevator and stood at the front of the elevator and shouted “No” “You’re not riding on that elevator” “No”! 25. The old man alone in the elevator was very belligerent and confrontational. 26. My lawyer did not enter the elevator because the old man blocked him. 27. My lawyer never said a word to the old man. 28. The man then bumped my lawyer with his chest. 29. I saw my lawyer kind-of step back from the force of the blow but my lawyer couldn’t back up because the wheels of the box stopped him and there was me and about 4 people trying to get on the elevator and they were right behind him. 30. The man then hit my lawyer a second time but this time with much more power and with his chest and his stomach this time. 31. My lawyer had to work to get his balance after being knocked off his feet. 32. The man then said “call the police. I want him arrested for assault. He just bumped me.” 33. My husband Roman Johnston said in a quiet voice, “no he didn’t. You bumped him.” 34. The man then got a very wild look on his face and was very aggressive and said to Roman, “what’s your name!” 35. The man alone in the elevator became even more aggressive and offensive. He had a very wild look in his eyes. 36. That was the only time my lawyer spoke and he gave legal advice to his client Roman and said, “Don’t answer that.” 37. The security guards came. 38. That man was taken around the corner away from us. I later found out that the old man’s name is Dan R. Hyatt. 39. At no time did my lawyer’s hands leave the box handle or his cane/crutch. At no time did his cane/crutch or box leave the floor. At no time did my lawyer come in contact with that man except when that man hit my lawyer with first his chest and then with his stomach and his chest to knock my lawyer on the floor or back. No part of my lawyer’s body entered the elevator. Dan R. Hyatt used his chest and stomach to repeatedly batter my lawyer who stood out in the hallway. 40. Hyatt didn’t want my lawyer in that elevator at all even though it was completely empty and even though there were 3 to 4 elevators on one side and 3 to 4 elevators on the other side of the hallway. 41. The security guards came and blocked us from leaving and my lawyer asked “am I under arrest” and they said “no but you can’t leave.” He said “then I’m leaving now” and tried to push the button for an elevator but they blocked him from leaving. 42. The federal police came and they roughly grabbed my lawyer’s hands behind him and put handcuffs on him. As they were leading him back to the Social Security Court with his hands tightly cuffed behind him I heard my lawyer say to them “on advice of counsel I have nothing to say.” 43. The federal police asked me if I saw what happened. They took my license information but didn’t write down what I was saying. There was a second policeman and when they confirmed that I had made a statement then said I could leave (but could not talk to my lawyer). 44. I haven’t left my house since that traumatic event in watching my lawyer get assaulted and battered and arrested nearly a week ago. 45. Seeing your lawyer get arrested is like seeing your Father get arrested and hauled away. I trust my lawyer and it was all extremely traumatic to me to see my lawyer get beaten and then get arrested and handcuffed and taken away to who-knows-where. 46. I am going to meet with my doctor so I can discuss the severe trauma I have suffered because I watched my lawyer get assaulted and battered by Hyatt and then arrested by 3 or 4 very large policemen. __________________________________________ Elizabeth J _____________________________________________ Roman J (who witnessed all except for the courtroom events)

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/4/2013 7:59:57 PM
Submited By:



Allegation that Dan R. Hyatt rules against claimants if he thinks their lawyers are "a*******", rules against claimants if they don't have lawyers, has "trouble with interracial couples", masquerades as a US District Court Judge, allegations that Dan R. Hyatt repeatedly lies, involved in theft of US Government property, allegation of criminal coercion and conspiracy letter to Chief Judge regarding local social security "judge" Dan Hyatt and attorney Paula Martin. ALJ Hyatt goes off the record and says he will never approve claimant no matter what the medical evidence says. Oregonn State Bar member, attorney Paula Martin does nothing about this abuse of authority by Oregon State Bar member and "Judge" Dan Hyatt. Claimant goes off to commit suicide because of the abuse of authority by Dan Hyatt and cowardice of Oregon attorney Paula Martin. Read the complaint letter; Daniel Bernath "my true representative" Oregon attorney Paula Martin abused me. click on letter to make it bigger horribly abused by Oregon Bar Member and SSA judge Dan Hyatt. Gutless Paula Martin, "oh we don't want to upset him". Paula M Martin Marla Heikkala & Associates PO Box 61749 Vancouver WA 98666 SSA ALJ Dan Hyatt in Vancouver sat under great seal fraudulently stating that he was a US District Court judge "Judge" Hyatt says OFF THE RECORD that he will never rule in claimant's favor no matter what the evidence says. Oregon attorney Paula Martin says and does NOTHING. click on letter to make it bigger Client tries to state on the record that "judge" Dan Hyatt has just stated he will violate his oath of office but "judge" Dan Hyatt and Oregon attorney Paula Martin shut her up. "evidence didn't matter to 'judge' Hyatt and Paula Martin just let it happen." Because of the abuse of power by 'judge" Dan Hyatt and malfeasance by Oregon attorney Paula Martin "I drove to the ocean...to kill myself" click on letter to make it bigger Signature "sorry, I am still shaking) a year later. Social Security "Judge" Dan Hyatt violated Social Security rules by stating, "you'll never win this case not matter what the evidence" OFF THE RECORD and not summarizing it on the record so the appeals court could read it. "Attorney" Paula Martin did not do her duty by insisting that "judge" Hyatt state on the record what he had just said and by not summarizing it on the record herself.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 2/4/2013 11:00:38 AM
Submited By:



Hyatt said he will "never put you on disability no matter what the evidence says." Hyatt said "I have trouble with interracial couples." Hyatt attacked a lawyer on crutches. Read it here: www.aspecialdayguide.com/shyster Cartoon of Dan Hyatt attacking the lawyer on crutches: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN5ebDHHxJk

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 2/3/2013 5:39:45 PM
Submited By:



Are there minus stars?

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 1/30/2013 2:01:29 PM
Submited By:



I have been before Judge Michael Gilbert 2 times. I found he I believe purposely went outside the guidelines of Law several times with regards to the scope of his questions. I don't know whether to believe the statistics. however my experience has not conformed to the numbers be represented. the time it took to get my case before this judge was extreme. my case was even delayed further because judge Gilbert stated he had a conflict in his scheduling. I am a disabled veteran on state pension. I have to tumors in my liver and blindness in my left eye as well as degenerative disc disease in all but 1 disc in my neck I was sole provider for my 3 girls when I was injured on the job in nursing. that was March of 2005. I have yet to receive my hearing information. the last of the hearings was held September 18th 2012. it is now the last day of January 2013. I had to sue the last judge I sure hope this time is different. this is the worst system I have ever been exposed to in government

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 1/18/2013 7:30:09 AM
Submited By:



Judge Gilbert is a hacket man; he does not follow the law. He is rude and insensitve. He acts as an advocate not as a judge. He is a prosecutor of anyone who believes he or she is disabled. He will tear you apart as a prosecutor and minimized any problem you may have. Every person appearing before him should contact their congressman and complain about his confusion. He prosecutes you for your impairments and highlights anything to destroy your credibility.

Judge: Dan R Hyatt
Date Posted: 11/3/2012 12:31:31 PM
Submited By:



Judge Hyatt is the kindest ALJ I have ever met. He is truly a compassionate Judge who takes a wholistic approach when holding his hearings. He doesn't just deny or allow benefits he tries to make sure claimants needs are met emotionally, physically, medically, and mental health care! The hog wash others spread about Judge Hyatt is just lies spread by terrible attorneys who don't like his rulings!!

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 9/6/2012 4:38:51 PM
Submited By:



Judge Gilbert is an excellent judge, appointed to accurately and vigilantly analyze cases to serve the American public. Do not be fooled by argumentative and libelious comments submitted.

Judge: Scott R Morris
Date Posted: 8/12/2012 8:00:33 AM
Submited By:



Does his research - hears each case with respect it deserves. Decent, high standard of care and practice. Deliberative and fair.

Judge: Joanne E Dantonio
Date Posted: 7/16/2012 11:39:34 AM
Submited By:



I'm assuming you appeal the decisions you disagree with. I have appealed more than one decision in front of this ALJ and each time they were remanded back.

Judge: Michael Gilbert
Date Posted: 7/13/2012 7:42:05 PM
Submited By: Tenee



Judge Gilbert was not a "good Judge." and I am using the politically correct terms in order to keep my temper. He was very unethical in terms about asking in the beginning of the proceedings about my marriage falling apart and if that had anything to do with my mental state, who was getting custody of my daughter in which there was complications that obviously he was aware of that not I nor my attorney was aware that he knew of, and a CPS investigation concerning my now ex-husband that was involving my divorce that was completely separate from my medical portion of my procedings. I am a disabled veteran. I felt attacked in every way, shape, and form. I suffer from PTSD, brain lesions, asthma, a pseduotumor that has made me 80% disabled with individual unemployability through the VA. He asked about my "stressors" and when it was told to him about my events overseas, his comments were less than favorable - "Is that it???" I have been in school before getting diagnosed with my psuedotumor and because of a misdiagnosis of migraines in which are now combined with the pseudotumor to date. He over-analysed everything and even asked for extra things such as letters from my instructors concerning the provisions that they had given me in order to stay in school to graduate so I wouldn't incur a debt to the VA and be successfull in graduating. According to his extenuating notes, he stated that I appeared, "normal" as if that I am supposed to be in some sort of state when I have made provisions to get better when my sight was going to go and much worse, being a single parent with two children to care for. He questioned my integrity as a parent, a female and a veteran. After all of this, I was not surprised that he denied my social security benefits for being honest and putting me through the worst 90 minutes that no one should have to endure. If my opinion, Judge Gilbert is a sniper when it comes to compassion and I have every right to file a formal complaint for the injustice that he had put upon me. Not for just his findings, but for how his process is. And hopefully, with my complaint on record, no matter what, it may help towards not having someone else go through this for them or their family.

Judge: Mattie Harvin-Woode
Date Posted: 6/26/2012 9:51:19 PM
Submited By:



U grill people to a point of no return... Have some compassion and don't be such a tuff women.....

Judge: Joanne E Dantonio
Date Posted: 6/14/2012 11:59:42 AM
Submited By: Experienced Attorney



I must disagree with the prior poster. Judge Dantonio's opinions are well thought out and well reasoned. I rarely appeal her decisions as a result. Although I may not always agree with her decisions, the clients are treated fairly and I know that she will consider all of the evidence in an impartial manner.

Judge: Michael C Blanton
Date Posted: 5/10/2012 8:07:58 AM
Submited By:



This is an excellent ALJ. I'm sure his denial rate will go up at some point a little but he will show compassion and treat everyone fairly.

Judge: Joanne E Dantonio
Date Posted: 5/10/2012 8:05:32 AM
Submited By:



Not one of the better ALJs. Her decisions are not written well.