Amelia G LombardoOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Amelia G Lombardo has disposed 449 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in DAYTON, OHIO. Out of those 449 dispostions, 50 were dismissed, 146 were approved and 253 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Amelia G Lombardo has approved in DAYTON for the 2010 fiscal year is 11%. The information below for Judge Amelia G Lombardo was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAYTON | 2010 | 449 | 399 | 253 | 146 | 11% | 33% | 56% |
| DAYTON | 2012 | 453 | 368 | 267 | 101 | 19% | 22% | 59% |
| DAYTON | 2014 | 414 | 359 | 248 | 111 | 13% | 27% | 60% |
| DAYTON | 2013 | 503 | 427 | 321 | 106 | 15% | 21% | 64% |
| DAYTON | 2011 | 463 | 410 | 305 | 105 | 11% | 23% | 66% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amelia G Lombardo | No Stats for FY2011 | ||
| All ALJs in DAYTON | 18% | 44% | 38% |
| All ALJs in OHIO | 17% | 45% | 38% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
See Federal Magistrate ruling in Chatterton v. Commissioner: May 29, 2013 S. ohio : ” The court concludes that the ALJ (Lombardo) created her own lay medical opinion with regard to Plaintiffs mental impairments in contravention of the applicable regulations and weight of the evidence.”
nuff said!
I love how she can make decisions off medical fields that you are never gave the opportunity to personally be evaluated by. I have a condition that only 1 in 500,000 people will acquire in a lifetime and more than likely she will never see again in her courtroom but she seems to be an expert in. Heck the Drs involved in treatment will maybe see once in their career. I would say the only expert in my mess is the one living it. Twenty plus years of working flushed down the toilet. In the meantime I will watch others that never worked get disability for things such as inability to handle authority figures and obesity.
She does not apply social security’s own rules correctly; she thinks she is a doctor and rejects real doctors’ opinions when it suits her; she is unfair in how she weighs credibility; she is extremely suspicious of claimants even when they are just ordinary working people and not drug addicts or malingerers. For example, see Pulfer v. Astrue.
HOW CAN A JUDGE APPROVE SO LOW OF A PERCENT IN THE STATE JUST WRONG
SHE SHOWS NO COMPASSION FOR THE ONES WHO ARE LESS FORTUNATE AND ARE REALLY DISABLED.I HOLD NO ANGER AT HER BUT FEEL SORRY FOR HER INSTEAD.ALL A PERSON HAS TO DO IS LOOK AT HER RECORD OF DENIALS.