Ann Farris, Hattiesburg , Mississippi Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Ann Farris has disposed 439 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. Out of those 439 dispostions, 56 were dismissed, 171 were approved and 212 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Ann Farris has approved in ALBUQUERQUE for the 2010 fiscal year is 8%. The information below for Judge Ann Farris was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBUQUERQUE | 2010 | 439 | 383 | 212 | 171 | 13% | 39% | 48% |
HATTIESBURG | 2010 | 87 | 83 | 41 | 42 | 5% | 48% | 47% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2012 | 521 | 454 | 242 | 212 | 13% | 41% | 46% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2015 | 492 | 427 | 214 | 213 | 13% | 43% | 43% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2014 | 552 | 480 | 216 | 264 | 13% | 48% | 39% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2013 | 571 | 492 | 256 | 236 | 14% | 41% | 45% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2011 | 542 | 497 | 267 | 230 | 8% | 42% | 49% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2016 | 343 | 283 | 135 | 148 | 17% | 43% | 39% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2017 | 379 | 303 | 124 | 179 | 20% | 47% | 33% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2018 | 179 | 143 | 79 | 64 | 20% | 36% | 44% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2019 | 378 | 325 | 183 | 142 | 14% | 38% | 48% |
ALBUQUERQUE | 2020 | 73 | 67 | 34 | 33 | 8% | 45% | 47% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Ann Farris | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in ALBUQUERQUE | 16% | 46% | 38% |
All ALJs in NEW MEXICO | 17% | 44% | 39% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
4 Comments
This judge has to be the slowest judge NM has! Why does it take her soooooo long? I have been waiting since May to hear any decision on my case!
Don’t expect this judge to believe a bunch of wind and BS. Better have the facts. Intense scrutiny and professional standards are the norm in this judge’s chambers. I wish that all who qualify will receive, but make sure you have your witnesses and your facts straight if you want to be recognized as disabled. I respect this judge, and I also acknowledge that her job is not easy.
“He’s a doctor, he should know better.” She said due to my education I should have understood the legal system. Well judge, you are also highly educated, next time you need healthcare, do your own medical care. That in essence is what you are saying, if educated in one field, we know all. You followed the letter of the law, but not the spirit. You are not the kind of judge I want in public service, but then, you are not there to be of service are you. I will pray for you…
Aweful and unethical. Judge slipped in evidence on a paper file case on the day of the hearing, well after I had copied the file, used the evidence and failed to provide copies at the hearing.