C. F. Moore, Washington , Washington dc Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge C. F. Moore has disposed 708 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TEXAS. Out of those 708 dispostions, 110 were dismissed, 467 were approved and 131 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge C. F. Moore has approved in DALLAS DOWNTOWN for the 2010 fiscal year is 21%. The information below for Judge C. F. Moore was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2010 | 708 | 598 | 131 | 467 | 16% | 66% | 19% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2012 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| WASHINGTON | 2012 | 47 | 39 | 12 | 27 | 17% | 57% | 26% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2011 | 636 | 552 | 126 | 426 | 13% | 67% | 20% |
| WASHINGTON | 2011 | 34 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 24% | 76% | 0% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2017 | 168 | 120 | 17 | 103 | 29% | 61% | 10% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2018 | 176 | 145 | 46 | 99 | 18% | 56% | 26% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2019 | 372 | 291 | 67 | 224 | 22% | 60% | 18% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2020 | 324 | 256 | 51 | 205 | 21% | 63% | 16% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C. F. Moore | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 18% | 45% | 37% |
| All ALJs in TEXAS | 18% | 41% | 40% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
Judge Moore was very pleasant and handle the hearing well even if my appeal is denied I must say he made me feel comfortable and relaxed and he paid attention
On my denial letter, Moore stated that he agreed with my testimony and my witness letter on everything, but denied my case based on WILLIAM JOSEPH DUBIN’S assessment, a man indicted for “Medicaid Fraud” along with his son!! I never even met William Joseph Dubin but he said since I was able “to make eye contact” and actually school smart, he disputed all my claims. Seriously, on God. I was denied based on “Eye Contact” based on a guy who never met me, and again, indicted for Medicaid fraud.
As the judge, you should have actually believed in your own judgement. Not gone against what you “said” you believed to be true, to choose the opinion of someone indicted on using people’s innocent unwell CHILDREN to commit “Medicaid Fraud” in Austin, TX. Seriously, Google it.
Anyone in his position who uses children to commit fraud isn’t well themselves and shouldn’t be trusted to give an honest opinion on anyone else.