Caroline Siderius, Seattle , Spokane , Tacoma , Washington , Washington , Washington Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Caroline Siderius has disposed 206 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in PORTLAND OR, OREGON. Out of those 206 dispostions, 28 were dismissed, 124 were approved and 54 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Caroline Siderius has approved in PORTLAND OR for the 2010 fiscal year is 25%. The information below for Judge Caroline Siderius was last updated on 10/01/2021.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions |
Total Decisions |
Total Denials |
Total Awards |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTLAND OR | 2010 | 195 | 173 | 70 | 103 | 11% | 53% | 36% |
SPOKANE | 2010 | 206 | 178 | 54 | 124 | 14% | 60% | 26% |
SEATTLE | 2012 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17% | 67% | 17% |
SPOKANE | 2012 | 516 | 428 | 100 | 328 | 17% | 64% | 19% |
SPOKANE | 2015 | 472 | 382 | 108 | 274 | 19% | 58% | 23% |
SPOKANE | 2014 | 456 | 398 | 108 | 290 | 13% | 64% | 24% |
SPOKANE | 2013 | 534 | 466 | 125 | 341 | 13% | 64% | 23% |
SEATTLE | 2011 | 34 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 12% | 82% | 6% |
SPOKANE | 2011 | 474 | 422 | 101 | 321 | 11% | 68% | 21% |
SPOKANE | 2016 | 269 | 229 | 76 | 153 | 15% | 57% | 28% |
SPOKANE | 2017 | 199 | 164 | 48 | 116 | 18% | 58% | 24% |
SPOKANE | 2018 | 81 | 71 | 26 | 45 | 12% | 56% | 32% |
SPOKANE | 2019 | 159 | 132 | 36 | 96 | 17% | 60% | 23% |
TACOMA | 2019 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
SEATTLE | 2020 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 14% | 71% | 14% |
SPOKANE | 2020 | 135 | 101 | 31 | 70 | 25% | 52% | 23% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Caroline Siderius | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in PORTLAND OR | 19% | 45% | 35% |
All ALJs in OREGON | 19% | 43% | 37% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
judge Siderius was very nice, respectful and genuine. Thank you judge siderius. and I would recommend her. she takes all medical evidence into considartion.
I have had this ALJ two times in seperate Fair-Right Hearings and both times she has denied me of my Benefits which I do not agree with the way she looks at her cases along with the choice of words that she used in her decision letters. I would not choose to ever see this What you want to call an Administrative Law Judge and wouldn’t recommend this judge to handle other peoples cases. I am unhappy with her performance