Charles DavisOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2015 *fiscal year, Judge Charles Davis has disposed 34 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in TUCSON, ARIZONA. Out of those 34 dispostions, 11 were dismissed, 21 were approved and 2 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Charles Davis has approved in TUCSON for the 2015 fiscal year is 18%. The information below for Judge Charles Davis was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUCSON | 2015 | 34 | 23 | 2 | 21 | 32% | 62% | 6% |
| TUCSON | 2016 | 361 | 302 | 101 | 201 | 16% | 56% | 28% |
| TUCSON | 2017 | 469 | 400 | 135 | 265 | 15% | 57% | 29% |
| TUCSON | 2018 | 231 | 206 | 63 | 143 | 11% | 62% | 27% |
| TUCSON | 2019 | 377 | 322 | 97 | 225 | 15% | 60% | 26% |
| TUCSON | 2020 | 286 | 235 | 88 | 147 | 18% | 51% | 31% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Davis | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in TUCSON | 17% | 56% | 27% |
| All ALJs in ARIZONA | 17% | 47% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
I feel very fortunate to have had Judge Charles Davis hear my case. He paid close attention to detail. My employment history was unusual. My job duties were sometimes different than the normal. He seemed to ask all of the right questions for someone who was really trying to understand my situation. This experience was great.
Charles Davis doesn’t deserve the title of Judge. He is corrupt abs doesn’t care about the American people. I am a dialed Veteran at 100% I suffer from PTSD with memory loss, TBI with Migraines, depression, anxiety, insomnia, fractured neck pains, DDD in the lower back, shoulder pains after surgery, and knew pains. I walk with a cane and he feels as though i can work. This man is a danger behind that desk!
Judge Charles Davis is an overtly corrupt judge due to the fact that he is not thee least bit impartial. He clearly cherry picks what evidence he can to deny claims and blatantly disregards strong pieces of evidence to ensure he can deny people of the benefits that they deserve. Judge Davis is a disgrace to the Social Security Administration and the principles of the United States of America. Hopefully Social Security will realize that this judge is problem and address the issue.