Cheryl TompkinOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2017 *fiscal year, Judge Cheryl Tompkin has disposed 156 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 156 dispostions, 49 were dismissed, 79 were approved and 28 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Cheryl Tompkin has approved in OAKLAND for the 2017 fiscal year is 31%. The information below for Judge Cheryl Tompkin was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAKLAND | 2017 | 156 | 107 | 28 | 79 | 31% | 51% | 18% |
| OAKLAND | 2018 | 177 | 155 | 72 | 83 | 12% | 47% | 41% |
| OAKLAND | 2019 | 224 | 178 | 103 | 75 | 21% | 33% | 46% |
| OAKLAND | 2020 | 170 | 118 | 75 | 43 | 31% | 25% | 44% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheryl Tompkin | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in OAKLAND | 22% | 46% | 32% |
| All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
I can’t say I got a fair shake from his honor, Mr. Tompkin..err I’m sorry, I meant Ms. Tompkin, it’s really hard to tell since her voice is so deep and manly over the phone.
So yeah, I got “accidentally” misgendered multiple times by this judge, and was given far below the typical amount of time to talk. I was humiliated in front of 2 other people, who then proceeded to follow suit and accidentally misgender me. And all while I was expected to talk about traumatic moments from my medical history. So two years of paperwork, stress, waiting, taking up my providers’ time to help advocate for my case, dealing with neglectful lawyers, and all I had to show for it was one of the most humiliating moments of my life.
I truly believe the Judge who handle my case, The Honorable Judge Cheryl Tomkin made the best decision in the fully favorable decision surrounding my case, which is quite complicated in definition to describe, but it is her master ability to gather a body of information and breaking it down into a understandable diagnostic in which the reviewing hearing group were able to convey to her in her final decision in the court hearing.
Wish this judge had more reviews like the others. I guess her denial rates speaks for itself. I’m screwed
Good luck if you get this judge. She thinks she’s also a medical doctor. My Experienced lawyer said she shouldn’t be a judge.
Good luck if you get this judge. She thinks she’s also a medical doctor. My lawyer said this person shouldn’t be a judge.