Christopher R Daniels, Lexington , Phoenix north , Kentucky , Arizona Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2013 *fiscal year, Judge Christopher R Daniels has disposed 392 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in LAS VEGAS, NEVADA. Out of those 392 dispostions, 49 were dismissed, 199 were approved and 144 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Christopher R Daniels has approved in LAS VEGAS for the 2013 fiscal year is 16%. The information below for Judge Christopher R Daniels was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAS VEGAS | 2015 | 552 | 447 | 201 | 246 | 19% | 45% | 36% |
LAS VEGAS | 2014 | 149 | 110 | 39 | 71 | 26% | 48% | 26% |
LEXINGTON | 2014 | 378 | 328 | 159 | 169 | 13% | 45% | 42% |
LEXINGTON | 2013 | 392 | 343 | 144 | 199 | 13% | 51% | 37% |
LAS VEGAS | 2016 | 485 | 399 | 183 | 216 | 18% | 45% | 38% |
LAS VEGAS | 2017 | 446 | 365 | 148 | 217 | 18% | 49% | 33% |
LAS VEGAS | 2018 | 230 | 193 | 87 | 106 | 16% | 46% | 38% |
LAS VEGAS | 2019 | 379 | 305 | 164 | 141 | 20% | 37% | 43% |
PHOENIX NORTH | 2019 | 28 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 29% | 39% | 32% |
LAS VEGAS | 2020 | 384 | 322 | 128 | 194 | 16% | 51% | 33% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher R Daniels | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in LAS VEGAS | 16% | 46% | 38% |
All ALJs in NEVADA | 16% | 46% | 38% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
This judge does not read the pertinent medical records. He got his wife hired at his office, which smacks of nepotism. He thinks he is some kind of genius, yet he only relies on inflated medical source records. He does the minimum for a maximum salary that he does not deserve of nearly 200k. He collects thousands per month in VA disability benefits too, so the taxpayers should be outraged.
I dont know how he denied an obvious disabled persons claim but he did. He wasted everyones time including the lawyers, very unprofessional. While I was speaking he would be giving very rude facial expressions acting like I didn’t know what I was talking about. If you get him as a lawyer you might as well drop the case because he is useless and delusional, One of the worse “judges” ive ever experienced with.
Judge Daniels: I don’t quite know how I feel about the Medical Expert Vudihn Mihn MD whom according to his Medical credentials ; his experience with dogs muscles and chest expiratory flow so is that comparing me as a human Black Woman to a Dog? Why should I trust this type of Expertise. This Same MD has never one examined me nor does he know if someone elses findings are correct or inaccurate.
Compared to Dog by your Expert:
Eva Wilson Slack
Judge Daniels is very professional and courteous, though somewhat reserved. He is extremely knowledgeable of the Social Security rules and procedures. He is always familiar with the claimant’s file prior to the hearing. He prefers to ask most of the questions at the hearing but will allow representatives the opportunity to make opening and closing remarks and question witnesses. He is always polite to both claimants and representatives. Excellent ALJ!
Thank you for going through all my sons records and being fair you are very good at your job.