Christopher R Inama, Minneapolis , San jose , Stockton , Minnesota , California , California Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2012 *fiscal year, Judge Christopher R Inama has disposed 2 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in BILLINGS, MONTANA. Out of those 2 dispostions, 2 were dismissed, 0 were approved and 0 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Christopher R Inama has approved in BILLINGS for the 2012 fiscal year is 27%. The information below for Judge Christopher R Inama was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAN JOSE | 2012 | 148 | 121 | 62 | 59 | 18% | 40% | 42% |
STOCKTON | 2012 | 252 | 219 | 95 | 124 | 13% | 49% | 38% |
BILLINGS | 2015 | 29 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 59% | 14% | 28% |
SAN JOSE | 2015 | 437 | 342 | 260 | 82 | 22% | 19% | 59% |
SAN JOSE | 2014 | 521 | 407 | 276 | 131 | 22% | 25% | 53% |
MINNEAPOLIS | 2013 | 138 | 129 | 85 | 44 | 7% | 32% | 62% |
SAN JOSE | 2013 | 393 | 328 | 199 | 129 | 17% | 33% | 51% |
BILLINGS | 2016 | 467 | 318 | 220 | 98 | 32% | 21% | 47% |
SAN JOSE | 2016 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
BILLINGS | 2017 | 383 | 268 | 197 | 71 | 30% | 19% | 51% |
BILLINGS | 2018 | 157 | 112 | 66 | 46 | 29% | 29% | 42% |
BILLINGS | 2019 | 308 | 246 | 188 | 58 | 20% | 19% | 61% |
BILLINGS | 2020 | 230 | 167 | 108 | 59 | 27% | 26% | 47% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher R Inama | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in BILLINGS | 21% | 36% | 44% |
All ALJs in MONTANA | 21% | 36% | 44% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
Too bad there isn’t a rating lower than one or I would give this Obama Ass Clown that rating.
I felt that Judge Inama was annoyed at the prospect of even having to hear my case. He looks for any reason to deny benefits and I felt his disgust towards me the whole time I was in front of him. He has no business being in this position of holding people’s livelihood in his hands!
I felt some sort of disdain and contempt coming from Judge Inama at my hearing. I think he wanted to deny me and then set about finding a way to do so. I paid into the system for 20+ years and now I am making a legitimate claim, and he denies me. The system failed, and this judge failed. Disgusted.
I forgot to say that he looks for the legal ways to deny. Don’t be fooled by the way he treats you.
This judge is not looking for truth. He has other priorities.Race and nationality matter to him a lot.