Claudi L Rosen-Underwood, Long beach , Orange , Phoenix , Phoenix north , California , California , Arizona , Arizona Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Claudi L Rosen-Underwood has disposed 43 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. Out of those 43 dispostions, 15 were dismissed, 27 were approved and 1 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Claudi L Rosen-Underwood has approved in ALBUQUERQUE for the 2010 fiscal year is 24%. The information below for Judge Claudi L Rosen-Underwood was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALBUQUERQUE | 2010 | 149 | 128 | 10 | 118 | 14% | 79% | 7% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2010 | 43 | 28 | 1 | 27 | 35% | 63% | 2% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2012 | 537 | 371 | 137 | 234 | 31% | 44% | 26% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2015 | 301 | 195 | 77 | 118 | 35% | 39% | 26% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2014 | 333 | 234 | 96 | 138 | 30% | 41% | 29% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2013 | 441 | 344 | 138 | 206 | 22% | 47% | 31% |
| ALBUQUERQUE | 2011 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0% | 53% | 47% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2011 | 422 | 314 | 96 | 218 | 26% | 52% | 23% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2016 | 270 | 156 | 63 | 93 | 42% | 34% | 23% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2017 | 217 | 157 | 51 | 106 | 28% | 49% | 24% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2018 | 78 | 45 | 15 | 30 | 42% | 38% | 19% |
| LONG BEACH | 2019 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| ORANGE | 2019 | 26 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 27% | 50% | 23% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2019 | 143 | 91 | 31 | 60 | 36% | 42% | 22% |
| ORANGE | 2020 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| PHOENIX NORTH | 2020 | 66 | 50 | 13 | 37 | 24% | 56% | 20% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claudi L Rosen-Underwood | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in ALBUQUERQUE | 16% | 46% | 38% |
| All ALJs in NEW MEXICO | 17% | 44% | 39% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
I have been seeing my doctors for over 15 years. One of my doctors sent in 4 letters explaining my condition and how it renders me “totally disabled”. My other doctor sent in 2 letters saying that in his opinion I am “totally disabled”. SSA sent me to 3 of their doctors and all 3 of them said I am “totally disabled”. There’s 34 medical exihibits in my SS file containing almost 900 pages of medical reports. 8 months after my hearing, I get a decision denying my case! In the decision, this so-called judge actually states that she did not give much, if any, weight to the letters from my doctors because she did not understand what the term “totally disabled” means! I’ve asked 7 of my grandson’s friends if they know what “totally disabled” means and all 7 of them knew exactly what it means and they are all only in the forth grade. It is absurd that a well educated so-called disability judge who is probably being paid over $100,000 per year with tax payer dollars, doesn’t know what “totally disabled” means. I don’t even know how such a thing is possible. She also said that I didn’t have any muscle atrophy but she never got closer than 15 feet to me and as far as I know she isn’t a doctor so how could she say I don’t have muscle atrophy? That woman doesn’t know what totally disabled means but yet she can diagnose whether a person has muscle atrophy without ever examining me or seeing my body. My lawyer appealed my case but he told me that it would take the appeals court over a year to decide my appeal and, get this, if the appeals court agrees with my appeal, they are going to send my case back to the same judge and instruct her to hold another hearing and issue a new decision! Why would they send my case back to the same judge who doesn’t even know what the term “totally disabled” means?My lawyer said that even after the appeals court sends my case back to the same judge that it will take this judge another year or more to hold another hearing. So, if my appeal is successful, I will have to wait more than two more years before I have another hearing and then when I do, I will have to go back in front of this same stupid woman so she can just deny my case again. This is so absurd that I cannot even believe it is happening for real. It’s like something out of a weird movie or something. SSA is a rip off. I wish I had done like so many and just worked under the table. That my health and well being as well as my life in general is in the hands of such blatant incompetence and stupidity is for me, a death sentence. My own government is spending hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars to deny me from simply getting back my own money that I paid into SSA for the past 34 years is nothing short of a crime, especially when the person deciding my case has already admitted in writing that she doesn’t understand a term that any 4th grader comprehends fully. What’s really scary is that I am only one of millions of Americans who are subjected to this kind of inexcusable incompetence from our own government, a government we are paying for. The judge is no better than me. Her income comes from the same place my benefits would come from – the US taxpayer. Except, I paid for my benefits – it’s my own money for God’s sake!
I applied for Social Security Disability September 2011, I worked 32 years. I have had Epilepsy since age 11.
My epilepsy consist of Grand and petite Mal seizures, i have rheumatoid arthritis for the last 8 years in my spine and my hips. and i was diagnosed with spinal stenosis back in April of this year 2013 i have been taking epidural shots and I’m in a scooter wheel chair. My disability hearing was August 5th, 2013 location Social security administration building in Phoenix, AZ decision was decided October the 1st 2013. My case was finally closed December 24th, 2013.
My case was denied by Claudia Rosen-Underwood. During my hearing the judge asked a Vocational rehab specialist can Tammy work 9 different jobs-each time the Vocation rehab Specialist said I was not able to work, and my Neurologist said I was no longer able to work and my family doctor said I was not able to work both doctors sent social security and my lawyer letters stating I’m no longer able to work. Claudia Rosen-Underwood stated in my social security denial letter she questioned both of my Doctors credibility!
..and she questioned my fathers, who is 78, credibility and said me and my Husband were Lying about my epilepsy and me of lying about me having a Stroke in 2005..and Doctor Shaw) sent me to have a. Cat Scan and MRI both test show Siezure Activity, Even though My Past Doctors and present Doctors have sent all my past medical records to show everything is 100% true
this judge listened to my case she is very proffesional very effeciant going into her court was like how i ran my crew when i could work a well oiled machine