Craig De Bernardis, Wilkes barre , Pennsylvania Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Craig De Bernardis has disposed 348 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in ELKINS PARK, PENNSYLVANIA. Out of those 348 dispostions, 50 were dismissed, 267 were approved and 31 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Craig De Bernardis has approved in ELKINS PARK for the 2010 fiscal year is 14%. The information below for Judge Craig De Bernardis was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELKINS PARK | 2010 | 348 | 298 | 31 | 267 | 14% | 77% | 9% |
| WILKES BARRE | 2010 | 142 | 103 | 3 | 100 | 27% | 70% | 2% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2012 | 518 | 370 | 15 | 355 | 29% | 69% | 3% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2015 | 287 | 209 | 80 | 129 | 27% | 45% | 28% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2014 | 426 | 349 | 55 | 294 | 18% | 69% | 13% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2013 | 500 | 392 | 7 | 385 | 22% | 77% | 1% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2011 | 371 | 289 | 12 | 277 | 22% | 75% | 3% |
| WILKES BARRE | 2011 | 131 | 108 | 4 | 104 | 18% | 79% | 3% |
| ELKINS PARK | 2016 | 145 | 125 | 42 | 83 | 14% | 57% | 29% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Craig De Bernardis | No Stats for FY2016 | ||
| All ALJs in ELKINS PARK | 20% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in PENNSYLVANIA | 19% | 42% | 40% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
4 Comments
There is no more glaring example of negative pressure and influence by the agency “bean counters”, Congress, and other entities affecting the judicial independence and decision making of this Judge than the dramatic change in his pay and deny rates. His pay rate was in the area of 80%, he was then cited as an outlier because of this rate in a report and his pay rate dropped drastically to the area of 40%. How absurd is that????!!!!
What is extremely interesting is the drastic change in this Judge’s approval rate during the past one and a half to two years: from the high 70% or low 80% to, now, only 44%! WHY IS THAT??
This man sounds sympathetic and understanding, why oh why couldnt I have gotten him? If you have medical reports that back you up there should be no reason to be denied. Since when do these judges has licenses to practice medicine?
Can somebody explain to me how 1 judge can have a 71% approval rate and another judge has a 24% approval rate? Is one judge being more sympathetic than the other? I really don’t understand the huge difference. Look at some of the approval rates and denial rates across the board. Makes NO sense to me!