Cynthia Floyd, Fresno , Long beach , California , California Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2014 *fiscal year, Judge Cynthia Floyd has disposed 42 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in FORT WAYNE, INDIANA. Out of those 42 dispostions, 8 were dismissed, 16 were approved and 18 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Cynthia Floyd has approved in FORT WAYNE for the 2014 fiscal year is 19%. The information below for Judge Cynthia Floyd was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRESNO | 2015 | 446 | 384 | 257 | 127 | 14% | 28% | 58% |
| FORT WAYNE | 2014 | 42 | 34 | 18 | 16 | 19% | 38% | 43% |
| FRESNO | 2014 | 208 | 163 | 114 | 49 | 22% | 24% | 55% |
| FRESNO | 2016 | 368 | 311 | 188 | 123 | 15% | 33% | 51% |
| LONG BEACH | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| LONG BEACH | 2017 | 379 | 282 | 149 | 133 | 26% | 35% | 39% |
| LONG BEACH | 2018 | 167 | 131 | 78 | 53 | 22% | 32% | 47% |
| LONG BEACH | 2019 | 348 | 288 | 154 | 134 | 17% | 39% | 44% |
| LONG BEACH | 2020 | 234 | 190 | 95 | 95 | 19% | 41% | 41% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Floyd | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in FORT WAYNE | 15% | 44% | 41% |
| All ALJs in INDIANA | 15% | 45% | 40% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
Don’t recommend for someone who has an Autism Spectrum disorder and how it effects each individual differently. Pretty disgusting how she views someone whom she doesn’t know:(
She is a very pleasent judge and very respectful she did a good thing for my appeal
Be prepared for the worst. She rolls her eyes, gasps for air, and plunges her body on the bench incessantly. When attempting to coax you into telling her things you can do, she bobs her head up and down. She will not allow you to talk about all your conditions; only the ones she wants to talk about. She will omit any medical evidence which supports your case. She is also a liar. She will state you said things and reported conditions that are not supported by the transcript. Maybe she doesn’t know that the claimant and attorney are privy to transcripts.
With this judge, if you can make a sandwich, you’re a chef. If you can take a bath, you’re a lifeguard. If you can drive a car, you’re a taxi driver. If you can buy a gallon of milk, you’re a seasoned shopper. If you can pick up a broken glass, you’re a housekeeper. If you can watch television, you’re a movie producer. If you live with someone, you are a socialite and get along well with others. If you live alone, you are 100% self sufficient and therefore, not disabled. If you stopped taking meds due to finances, you’ve not followed doctors orders. If you have continually taken prescribed medicines, your medical condition is being controlled with said medicines. She relies heavily on the initial SSDI findings of years past and discredits opposing and more recent medical opinions. This, in spite of the fact that you have probably never met with a state employed doctor.
Her apparent knowledge of the law is nil. Her propensity for error is unmatched. Her ethics do not encompass common honesty as falsehoods and lies abound.