Dana RosenOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Dana Rosen has disposed 31 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA. Out of those 31 dispostions, 0 were dismissed, 22 were approved and 9 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Dana Rosen has approved in GREENSBORO for the 2010 fiscal year is 13%. The information below for Judge Dana Rosen was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREENSBORO | 2010 | 31 | 31 | 9 | 22 | 0% | 71% | 29% |
GREENSBORO | 2012 | 597 | 354 | 152 | 202 | 41% | 34% | 25% |
GREENSBORO | 2014 | 43 | 42 | 34 | 8 | 2% | 19% | 79% |
GREENSBORO | 2013 | 418 | 336 | 180 | 156 | 20% | 37% | 43% |
GREENSBORO | 2011 | 362 | 315 | 117 | 198 | 13% | 55% | 32% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Dana Rosen | No Stats for FY2011 | ||
All ALJs in GREENSBORO | 16% | 55% | 29% |
All ALJs in NORTH CAROLINA | 15% | 50% | 35% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
My hearing was fair and I believe she is wants to do everything after hearing from both sides. She promised to come back to me very soon hopefully that’s when I have to go surgery.
This is a matter of keeping life because if death happens the claimant Is void of compensation.
All she does is granting continuations again and again even when the cases were with OALJ for more than 18months (because of the fact that parties couldnt reach any agreement), and she just ignores the fact that the claimant has been suffering and needs her to act. She just doesnt want to deal with cases.
Judge Dana Rosen definitely lets you know she’s boss. But was fair in my ruling. Especially given the fact I represented myself and never been to court before. She can be short but is very fair when both parties(my employer) leaving feeling the decision should have went better. She gets my vote. I’m ready to close this chapter.
Uggh!!! What a despicable human being… A total jerk at my hearing for no reason. Ignores evidence and takes months to make a decision.
She is an unfair ALJ, who is close-minded, does not listen to pertinent testimony and constantly restricts questioning. Personality-wise, she is incredibly rude, interrupts and is argumentative, even catty over things, such as semantics during questioning, and anything petty. She loves to show whose in control. I respect her position but not people who act like this. She even tried to say my client needed to lose weight! My client was barely 10 or 15 lbs overweight— and behind the bench, she looks at least 50 lbs overweight. with that fat rosy face of hers She’s one of those people who use their power to be mean because they are powerless and feel worthless in their personal life.