David M BlumeOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge David M Blume has disposed 403 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 403 dispostions, 49 were dismissed, 289 were approved and 65 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge David M Blume has approved in SACRAMENTO for the 2010 fiscal year is 17%. The information below for Judge David M Blume was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SACRAMENTO | 2010 | 403 | 354 | 65 | 289 | 12% | 72% | 16% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2012 | 691 | 604 | 199 | 405 | 13% | 59% | 29% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2015 | 625 | 550 | 192 | 358 | 12% | 57% | 31% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2014 | 619 | 538 | 183 | 355 | 13% | 57% | 30% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2013 | 653 | 563 | 191 | 372 | 14% | 57% | 29% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2011 | 594 | 504 | 159 | 345 | 15% | 58% | 27% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2016 | 527 | 469 | 151 | 318 | 11% | 60% | 29% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2017 | 546 | 444 | 136 | 308 | 19% | 56% | 25% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2018 | 243 | 195 | 53 | 142 | 20% | 58% | 22% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2019 | 489 | 391 | 110 | 281 | 20% | 57% | 22% |
| SACRAMENTO | 2020 | 308 | 256 | 58 | 198 | 17% | 64% | 19% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| David M Blume | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in SACRAMENTO | 19% | 50% | 31% |
| All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
7 Comments
Judge Blume please call me and review my case.
Everyone speaks so nice because they are the ones who got approved as for me fighting for 2 years went down the drain again.
Just want to say, this judge is so kind and fair, I just cant say enough about him, I don’t know how the claim turned out right now, but just a very good judge, and person. SSA is lucky to have Judge Blume.
I feel its important to look at all aspects of a case. in my case i feel he listened to what i had to say although noone can ever understand what another person goes through on a daily basis. i have worked the last 18 years for the same company and really wished i could still. i do feel that he tried to understand and looked at all my reports from doctors to try and make a fair decsion. i have not found out what that is but he did ask questions and i did my best to answer them. he also ask the vocational specialist questions, so i would say he was fair in the way he handled my appointment. ive been more upset with the ssi doctors that ive had to go see, i feel they need to be looked into because you see them for a couple minutes and for me they didnt even know what was wrong or why i was there, the doctor thought because i was missing parts of four fingers that was the reason, even though my body was jerking uncontrollably and thats why i was there. i did tell this to the judge and he was very kind about letting me know i would not be judged that way in his office, so i would just like to thank him no matter what his descion is at least he was kind to me and listened to all i had to say. so again thank you for that.
Very Learned, well studied all the Disability Laws.
But more importantly apply these laws in right perspective in positive manner.
GOD BLESS THIS SOUL
Although I do not know the outcome of my hearing, I am appreciative of being able to have a fair hearing. I felt Judge Blume fully listened to me, put me at ease as he saw how nervous I was. I felt respected and valued for my years of work. No matter the outcome I can honestly say that I had a fair hearing and was able to present all of my difficulties and struggles with employment.