David W Engel, Mcalester , New orleans , San antonio , Shreveport , Tulsa , Oklahoma , Louisiana , Texas , Louisiana , Oklahoma Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge David W Engel has disposed 76 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. Out of those 76 dispostions, 5 were dismissed, 59 were approved and 12 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge David W Engel has approved in FORT SMITH for the 2010 fiscal year is 14%. The information below for Judge David W Engel was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORT SMITH | 2010 | 39 | 36 | 9 | 27 | 8% | 69% | 23% |
| NEW ORLEANS | 2010 | 76 | 71 | 12 | 59 | 7% | 78% | 16% |
| SHREVEPORT | 2010 | 60 | 30 | 5 | 25 | 50% | 42% | 8% |
| TULSA | 2010 | 773 | 619 | 90 | 529 | 20% | 68% | 12% |
| MCALESTER | 2012 | 34 | 28 | 5 | 23 | 18% | 68% | 15% |
| TULSA | 2012 | 1162 | 784 | 173 | 611 | 33% | 53% | 15% |
| TULSA | 2015 | 654 | 550 | 125 | 425 | 16% | 65% | 19% |
| TULSA | 2014 | 598 | 486 | 106 | 380 | 19% | 64% | 18% |
| MCALESTER | 2013 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| TULSA | 2013 | 775 | 581 | 124 | 457 | 25% | 59% | 16% |
| FORT SMITH | 2011 | 20 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 0% | 80% | 20% |
| TULSA | 2011 | 890 | 679 | 124 | 555 | 24% | 62% | 14% |
| SAN ANTONIO | 2016 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| TULSA | 2016 | 622 | 525 | 147 | 378 | 16% | 61% | 24% |
| TULSA | 2017 | 582 | 482 | 133 | 349 | 17% | 60% | 23% |
| TULSA | 2018 | 296 | 247 | 58 | 189 | 17% | 64% | 20% |
| TULSA | 2019 | 420 | 350 | 64 | 286 | 17% | 68% | 15% |
| TULSA | 2020 | 329 | 283 | 52 | 231 | 14% | 70% | 16% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| David W Engel | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in FORT SMITH | 16% | 47% | 37% |
| All ALJs in ARKANSAS | 16% | 42% | 43% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
A real piece of work for a Judge, doesn’t care if you’ve stopped using drugs or not, if it’s in you’re record that you’ve used in your past you will be judged for it and denied unfairly without regard. Kinda makes a person wish they were dishonest about using in the first place, so while over half the population at the homeless shelter in Tulsa get free room and board all the drugs and alchohol they want they can collect for being disabled but let someone apply who actually is disabled but has a “history” of marijuana use and they get denied.. doesn’t make ANY SENSE. So by this judge’s actions i give him one star by my standards one star is too much have a great day.
This ALJ is thorough and methodical. Will ask for opening statement and do general questioning. Usually does one hypo based on DDS opinions of RFC and one based on FCE or client’s testimony.
Fair judge, but be ready to address unemployment, inconsistent statements in the file, or drug and alcohol issues. He does not overlook that kind of thing at his hearings but tends to be cool that hit those issues head on honestlyrather than try to cover them up as if they did not exist.
With all these silly websites, such a great page keeps my interent hope alive.
A lot nicer than wolfe but approves less cases. Pretty cool judge.