David Z NisnewitzOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge David Z Nisnewitz has disposed 672 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in QUEENS, NEW YORK. Out of those 672 dispostions, 111 were dismissed, 273 were approved and 288 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge David Z Nisnewitz has approved in QUEENS for the 2010 fiscal year is 21%. The information below for Judge David Z Nisnewitz was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUEENS | 2010 | 672 | 561 | 288 | 273 | 17% | 41% | 43% |
| QUEENS | 2012 | 441 | 364 | 173 | 191 | 17% | 43% | 39% |
| QUEENS | 2015 | 114 | 98 | 32 | 66 | 14% | 58% | 28% |
| QUEENS | 2014 | 275 | 226 | 55 | 171 | 18% | 62% | 20% |
| QUEENS | 2013 | 386 | 323 | 108 | 215 | 16% | 56% | 28% |
| QUEENS | 2011 | 689 | 542 | 304 | 238 | 21% | 35% | 44% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| David Z Nisnewitz | No Stats for FY2011 | ||
| All ALJs in QUEENS | 19% | 50% | 31% |
| All ALJs in NEW YORK | 19% | 48% | 33% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
Is a terrific judge but his fear of the “galacktashneider,” clouds his thinking.
Although he has flashes of compassion, he seems to operate from a strong ego. He has been the chief ALJ for this office for a while. He argues for argument sake and raises his voice a lot. He is smart, bu never seems prepared and is not up on new regulations or cases at times. Be ready for an unpredictable hearing. He protects his experts from cross examination at times and interrupts questioning as a matter of routine. He does not manage time well and does not seem to respect the time of others well. He often makes unrealistic demands from advocates, especially in the area of getting evidence and neglects the mandates on his office to pursue evidence.