Elisabeth McGee, Shreveport , Louisiana Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2017 *fiscal year, Judge Elisabeth McGee has disposed 242 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. Out of those 242 dispostions, 57 were dismissed, 80 were approved and 105 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Elisabeth McGee has approved in FORT SMITH for the 2017 fiscal year is 8%. The information below for Judge Elisabeth McGee was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHREVEPORT | 2017 | 242 | 185 | 105 | 80 | 24% | 33% | 43% |
| SHREVEPORT | 2018 | 145 | 118 | 66 | 52 | 19% | 36% | 46% |
| FORT SMITH | 2019 | 81 | 67 | 44 | 23 | 17% | 28% | 54% |
| SHREVEPORT | 2019 | 171 | 130 | 73 | 57 | 24% | 33% | 43% |
| FORT SMITH | 2020 | 348 | 319 | 156 | 163 | 8% | 47% | 45% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth McGee | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in FORT SMITH | 16% | 47% | 37% |
| All ALJs in ARKANSAS | 16% | 42% | 43% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
5 Comments
Her supervisors and our congressional members need to be made aware of her conduct. No judge should get by with putting false information and contradictory info into the rulings. If she is doing this to get back at some attorney’s because she does not like how they argue a case, that is btw them. Leave us out of it.
This judge’s ruling was shocking and unfair. Many hurtful assumptions were made and both my legal team and physicians were at a loss, meanwhile I continue to suffer and am unable to get the treatment needed to save my life. The ruling also contradicts itself and lacks important data proving my daily hardship and disability.
I felt her ruling was unfair and she made assumptions without asking me any questions.
I felt her ruling was unfair and she made assumptions without asking me any questions.
I was denied. Her ruling was full of lies and assumptions. She contradicts herself several times. Lots of miss information.