5 based on 2 reviews

3 Comments

  1. Ann E. Mouse says:

    Could a more despicable malapropos and censurable individuals could possibly be assigned to determine the eligibility of disability cases for the Social Security Administration? Adjunct Glenn G MeyerS is scathing and smarmy in his judicial reviews utilizing whatever minor and salacious information he can glean from personal therapy sessions, doctor visits or casual observations by social workers, case managers, nurses, technicians and doctors; to deny your case. Any minor indication of “normalcy” in one’s personal life will be used against claimants as proof positive they are ready, able, and willing to work. Nothing short of hyperbolic pain and grief worthy of an epic tempest of a Shakespearean tragedy will grant a disability claim. Even then, on had better have EXCEEDINGLY EXHAUSTIVE medical records (BY A WHITE MALE DOCTOR, WITH A PRESTIGIOUS MEDICAL PEDIGREE) stating, “this is the worst case of __________ I have ever seen in my entire _______ years of treating ________ ! There is no possible cure or treatment to the best of my knowledge. There is no possible way any individual with such a sever degree of _________ could ever possible work with such a ___________ of ___________ .”

    Even then, one cannot be assured the very finely attuned in medical treatment theory and proficient in the current treatment modalities of psychological disorders; the self self-confirming mind of Adjunct Glenn G. Meyers may agree with them. (SIDE NOTE; it may be rather interesting if any of long list of trained, certified, and licensed mental health professionals who have provided expert testimony on behalf of other claimants, would ever be interested in breaking the Gold Water Standard ,and offer their professional assessments of Adjunct Glenn G. Meyers based upon their own personal observations and the official decisions he has rendered.)

    When no other such option is available and you do have good quality records and the qualified statements backing you up, this highly blisteringly, overblown windbag of inaptitude will succumb to the ultimate choice of facing the sad truth he must grant your claim. However not without one last sting of viciousness. It is in all likelihood will be only a partial approval. Hoping you will graciously accept his magnanimity. His belief is because at this juncture you are assuredly worn down, and have grown weary of the endless process of of delays. Fear not! This of course is the bullies tactic. You have another option. One which your lawyer will advise against. You can appeal Glenn G Meyer’s faulty and often times ill formed Partial Approval. As with most of his decisions, they are often not founded in the law, but in his own form of personal opinion and “Nancy Drew and the Case of Destructive Reasoning.”

    If one looks at Meyer’s approval record they will notice a patter. He was quite happily approving cases in Puerto Rico and suddenly denying them at an alarming rate when he moved to Seattle. One might ask, what has happend to this adjunct here in Seattle to cause such a change in his processes? Statistics do not lie and something is affooot dear Watson. So those who are reading this review must find heart this particular adjunct is bigoted, opinionated and cannot be trusted. Slowly begin to pick apart his reasoning. One will find he creates a false sense of logic based upon erroneous details which detract away from the facts of logic and law. Beliefs are not what the justice system and the Rules of the Social Security System are founded upon. If your case does in fact follow the letter of the definitions for disability, then you have a case.

    REMEMBER only a Doctor or a Social Worker who have the proper credentials and licensure can determine if your condition is chronic. NOT an adjunct. If you have the records and documentation to prove this fact, then you have a case to stand upon. Fight for what you know to be true, this is your money NOT an entitlement.

    — DO NOT POST ANYTHING ON SOCIAL MEDIA AS YOURSELF OR IN A MANNER WHICH CAN BE TRACED BACK TO YOU
    — DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE TAGGED IN ANYBODY ELSES SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS
    — DO NOT SPEAK ABOUT ANYTHING TO ANY OF YOUR MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OR SOCIAL WORKERS ABOUT TOPICS OTHER THAN WHAT SPECIFICALLY CONCERNS YOUR DISABILITY CLAIM
    — ONLY YOUR LAWYER HAS ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGES AND CANNOT BE REQUIRED TO TESTIFY AGAINST YOU.
    — SOCIAL SECURITY CAN, MAY, OR WILL HIRE PEOPLE TO FOLLOW YOU.
    — AS LONG AS IT TAKES TO RESOLVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CLAIM, YOU SHOULD NEVER BE SEEN OR DOCUMENTED HAVING A GOOD DAY. (This may take years and I know, it is going to be horrible and tortious)

    Do not lose heart here folks. This is a long process and the Management of Seattle Social Security Office seem to have an erroneous belief most every applicant is faking their claims and management wants to delay the process as much as possible, in order to discourage as manny applicants as possible. The general consensus from informed insiders, seems to be, this it is a toxic work environment where everyone despises, hates, or mistrusts their coworkers.

  2. carrolyn says:

    Amen how true , a abusive man. Want to talk in extensive detail about you sex life.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Another old, rich white man. He only sees what he wants to see like most bigots. If you have a disability hearing with him you’d better be missing a limb or two. If any of his children or grandchildren were sexually abused he might think differently but, alas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *