H. Munday, Charlottesville , Virginia Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2012 *fiscal year, Judge H. Munday has disposed 19 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in CHARLESTON WV, WEST VIRGINIA. Out of those 19 dispostions, 1 were dismissed, 9 were approved and 9 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge H. Munday has approved in CHARLESTON WV for the 2012 fiscal year is 18%. The information below for Judge H. Munday was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLESTON WV | 2012 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 5% | 47% | 47% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2015 | 353 | 295 | 199 | 96 | 16% | 27% | 56% |
| CHARLESTON WV | 2014 | 310 | 256 | 181 | 75 | 17% | 24% | 58% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2014 | 60 | 40 | 24 | 16 | 33% | 27% | 40% |
| CHARLESTON WV | 2013 | 268 | 222 | 137 | 85 | 17% | 32% | 51% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2016 | 301 | 243 | 165 | 78 | 19% | 26% | 55% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2017 | 299 | 212 | 118 | 94 | 29% | 31% | 39% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2018 | 169 | 128 | 77 | 51 | 24% | 30% | 46% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2019 | 391 | 321 | 203 | 118 | 18% | 30% | 52% |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 2020 | 233 | 191 | 116 | 75 | 18% | 32% | 50% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H. Munday | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in CHARLESTON WV | 16% | 45% | 39% |
| All ALJs in WEST VIRGINIA | 17% | 42% | 41% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
10 Comments
The most subborn person i have ever came in contact with . You cant treat people bad and think you will have a good life . Karma will come around
In reference to the below comment, I have rated her 1 star. It was a grave mistake to miss the stars. She is worth less than 1.
Judge Munday is a rude, controlling, condescending judge. During my phone hearing she was not even referring to the correct medical information. She would not let either me nor my attorney elaborate on any points. I wanted to point out the discrepancy in medical records and asked for permission to speak. Her response was, “No you may not.” She based my ruling on her own opinion and even disagreed the opinions of STATE evaluations. I felt I was given absolutely no respect or professionalism. She treated the entire hearing as a simple waste of her time.
Unprofessional and ruthlessly thorough judge. My hearing was over an hour late so Judge Munday had no patience for me.
Judge Munday asked me no questions about my disability during my hearing. She gave little to no weight to the medical experience and documentation of my treating physicians. Yet, she used that same documentation to draw her own opinions based on things she was able to cherry-pick out of my life. You know how disabled people probably can’t make breakfast every day? Well, to put it simply: Judge Munday will find the 5 days your therapist documented that you made breakfast out of 3 years and conclude you aren’t disabled.
I hope she gets retrained or goes away ’cause she sure is rude to people that don’t deserve it.
She is miserable. She is nasty to claimants, attorneys, expert witnesses and staff. She rolls her eyes. She throws her hands up in the air. She is very aggressive. This is unfortunate. Every claimant deserves to be treated with respect and given a fair hearing. Judge Munday’s behavior assures they have neither.
This judge should be impeached. She made a disparaging comment about my disability before the hearing started. She made up facts, told me she would not answer any questions, told me she didn’t have time to listen to my case. I asked her how long I had and she refused to answer. Additionally, there were 20 missing exhibits. I told her and she ignored it. I copied my appeal to my congressman, the IG for investigation, the general council as well as the Commissioner of the Agency. The hearing was a mockery of due process and the judge’s behavior unconscionable.
Munday,,,,,,,,smh really screwed my Tues.. wed. Etc…rude ,hearing only what she wants to here ,,she heard failed drug test and never mind the doctors and lawyers and her vec guy say I cud do zero jobs ..well lady respectfully put ,if u was in half the pain and live a hr of our lives , I wud guarantee you may take it a little easy on the people you see and duh high dosages of drugs is how most of have to spent our days believe me it’s not like we want to, I just really wish she wouldn’t be so worried about her “rep” of 30% probably a bonus or steak u get for that , while we struggle EVERY day tryn to put gas in our cars and food on table for kids, and because we’re denied so nonchalantly ,then we have to deal with judgement of drs looking down on us like we Faking because the ol mighty heard drug and never gave me or my family a fighting chance for that I have to forgive u and thank u smh ….james
This ALJ is purely psychotic. She is rude, aggressive, disrespectful, insensitive, and plainly behaves like someone with a profound mental disorder. From her early approval rates, it appears she was sent off for retraining by the SSA and post retraining her approval rate fell sharply. Given her start in WV and subsequent move to VA, it is also possible she was transferred from WV, due to her psychotic behavior, and placed in Charlottesville. Often, the SSA will not dismiss problematic ALJs but transfer them to a different ODAR. All SSA claimants who are treated rude and disrespectfully by ALJ Munday should be encouraged to file a complaint with Appeal’s Counsel, the Office of General Council, and their local representative.
This judge is a thorough and dispassionate lady. She expects representatives to know the file and to have all evidence in the record in advance of a hearing unless you have a very good reason why there is a delay. If you believe a consultative exam should be scheduled, move for same a few months before a hearing. This judge is conservative.
This judge is a very dispassionate yet thorough lady. She is conservative. She expects representatives to have all medical and other evidence in the record before a hearing unless you have very good cause why the evidence is not already in the record. If you think a consultative exam is in order, make a motion a couple months before a hearing for same. Don’t wait.