Janice E Barnes-Williams, Topeka ks , Kansas Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2011 *fiscal year, Judge Janice E Barnes-Williams has disposed 270 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. Out of those 270 dispostions, 41 were dismissed, 79 were approved and 150 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Janice E Barnes-Williams has approved in KANSAS CITY for the 2011 fiscal year is 22%. The information below for Judge Janice E Barnes-Williams was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KANSAS CITY | 2012 | 188 | 154 | 123 | 31 | 18% | 16% | 65% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2012 | 278 | 228 | 174 | 54 | 18% | 19% | 63% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2015 | 390 | 292 | 228 | 64 | 25% | 16% | 58% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2014 | 437 | 342 | 251 | 91 | 22% | 21% | 57% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2013 | 449 | 356 | 267 | 89 | 21% | 20% | 59% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2011 | 270 | 229 | 150 | 79 | 15% | 29% | 56% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2016 | 333 | 260 | 176 | 84 | 22% | 25% | 53% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2017 | 354 | 251 | 138 | 113 | 29% | 32% | 39% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2018 | 215 | 170 | 92 | 78 | 21% | 36% | 43% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2019 | 308 | 232 | 162 | 70 | 25% | 23% | 53% |
| KANSAS CITY | 2020 | 249 | 195 | 136 | 59 | 22% | 24% | 55% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janice E Barnes-Williams | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in KANSAS CITY | 22% | 33% | 46% |
| All ALJs in MISSOURI | 19% | 38% | 42% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
4 Comments
Was very professional and made me feel comfortable during my disability hearing
This judge was very thorough. I felt heard during my testimony (at the phone hearing due to COVID-19). She listed all of the supporting information used in her decision and granted me disability for an illness that is extremely rare and not very well-known. I appreciate her thoroughness and the positive finding.
This judge was respectful, but based her decision on the Social Security doctor’s 10 minute exam, instead of my primary care doctor’s evaluation of me. I knew going in she had a very low approval rating compared to others in the KC office. She seemed to have her mind already made up at the beginning. Just bad luck on my part to have her assigned to my case instead of one of the others. Good luck to others if she ends up being your ALJ.
Very professional and respectful.