Janis Estrada, Houston downtown , Houston-bissonnet , Texas , Texas Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Janis Estrada has disposed 462 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in DALLAS DOWNTOWN, TEXAS. Out of those 462 dispostions, 56 were dismissed, 272 were approved and 134 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Janis Estrada has approved in DALLAS DOWNTOWN for the 2010 fiscal year is 23%. The information below for Judge Janis Estrada was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOUSTON DOWNTOWN | 2010 | 462 | 406 | 134 | 272 | 12% | 59% | 29% |
| HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 2012 | 481 | 391 | 230 | 161 | 19% | 33% | 48% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2015 | 348 | 287 | 90 | 197 | 18% | 57% | 26% |
| HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 2015 | 58 | 49 | 24 | 25 | 16% | 43% | 41% |
| HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 2014 | 420 | 346 | 110 | 236 | 18% | 56% | 26% |
| HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 2013 | 441 | 353 | 130 | 223 | 20% | 51% | 29% |
| HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 2011 | 386 | 333 | 134 | 199 | 14% | 52% | 35% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2016 | 375 | 306 | 121 | 185 | 18% | 49% | 32% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2017 | 317 | 257 | 67 | 190 | 19% | 60% | 21% |
| DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 2018 | 134 | 103 | 38 | 65 | 23% | 49% | 28% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janis Estrada | No Stats for FY2018 | ||
| All ALJs in DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 18% | 45% | 37% |
| All ALJs in TEXAS | 18% | 41% | 40% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
It was a pleasure meeting Judge Estrada. The judge was professional and patient when I stated I did not understand her question. Judge Estrada in my opinion was caring and concerned about my illness and my living conditions.I thanked the Lord for giving me such a compassionate and understanding judge to rule over my case. I’m still waiting for my approval letter, but I have that she will follow through with her judgement as she stated about my case.
Having had the complete and utter displeasure of meeting her, it is quite easy to rate her with the lowest marking, I would rate even lower if possible. She is rude, condescending, unethical, and completely incompetent as a judge. She cannot remain impartial and makes her decisions based on personal reasons, not the facts presented her. I am ashamed that a person of this caliber and low moral fiber is allowed to hear cases that determine the future of honest applicants and depend on her decision to better their unfortunate situation.