Jeffrey W Hart, Minneapolis , Minnesota Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2011 *fiscal year, Judge Jeffrey W Hart has disposed 131 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN. Out of those 131 dispostions, 27 were dismissed, 39 were approved and 65 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Jeffrey W Hart has approved in MILWAUKEE for the 2011 fiscal year is 15%. The information below for Judge Jeffrey W Hart was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2012 | 550 | 467 | 261 | 206 | 15% | 37% | 47% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2015 | 467 | 401 | 147 | 254 | 14% | 54% | 31% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2014 | 516 | 432 | 162 | 270 | 16% | 52% | 31% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2013 | 507 | 429 | 191 | 238 | 15% | 47% | 38% |
| MILWAUKEE | 2011 | 131 | 104 | 65 | 39 | 21% | 30% | 50% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2011 | 184 | 149 | 89 | 60 | 19% | 33% | 48% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2016 | 459 | 385 | 126 | 259 | 16% | 56% | 27% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2017 | 483 | 375 | 137 | 238 | 22% | 49% | 28% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2018 | 214 | 178 | 66 | 112 | 17% | 52% | 31% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2019 | 90 | 73 | 32 | 41 | 19% | 46% | 36% |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 2020 | 315 | 269 | 118 | 151 | 15% | 48% | 37% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey W Hart | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in MILWAUKEE | 18% | 43% | 39% |
| All ALJs in WISCONSIN | 17% | 45% | 38% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
4 Comments
The Judge “ didn’t even know if the computer worked or was on” in his own words for the hearing. The court room only had certain color of people not multi race different backgrounds different religions preferences and male but the reporter. They didn’t even have my information right and did have free advocate available for legal aid which isn’t good enough for non criminal. I perceive that specific judge needing sensitivity training and update on what women really go thru training. I perceive he would defense rapist if he needed too
The Judge “ didn’t even know if the computer worked or was on” in his own words for the hearing. The court room only had certain color of people not multi race different backgrounds different religions preferences and male but the reporter. They didn’t even have my information right and did have free advocate available for legal aid which isn’t good enough for non criminal. I perceive that specific judge needing sensitivity training and update on what women really go thru training. I perceive he would defense rapist if he needed too
Excellent Judge, very fair and kind. Considers all facts of the case and obviously spends a lot of time on each case.
This man should be admonished. Taken off the bench. I appeared before him as a 100% disabled veteran to request SSI and he denied me. then told me to file a claim against the Veterans Affairs office. This was a side bar right after the hearing. He made it clear he had worked for the Veterans Affairs prior to this current job at the Social Security Administration. He put information in my file that was not even related to the case, and had no bearing on my disability request. He is still serving in the military at Fort Snelling, Minnesota. I feel he has no conscience and does not even care about his fellow military service members in need of help.