John NoelOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2015 *fiscal year, Judge John Noel has disposed 97 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT. Out of those 97 dispostions, 8 were dismissed, 40 were approved and 49 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge John Noel has approved in HARTFORD for the 2015 fiscal year is 19%. The information below for Judge John Noel was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARTFORD | 2015 | 97 | 89 | 49 | 40 | 8% | 41% | 51% |
| HARTFORD | 2016 | 391 | 315 | 210 | 105 | 19% | 27% | 54% |
| HARTFORD | 2017 | 480 | 418 | 248 | 170 | 13% | 35% | 52% |
| HARTFORD | 2018 | 214 | 180 | 111 | 69 | 16% | 32% | 52% |
| HARTFORD | 2019 | 400 | 336 | 158 | 178 | 16% | 45% | 40% |
| HARTFORD | 2020 | 315 | 256 | 119 | 137 | 19% | 43% | 38% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Noel | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in HARTFORD | 18% | 42% | 39% |
| All ALJs in CONNECTICUT | 18% | 43% | 39% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
Seems to have found religion in the current environment. Well prepared and understanding of counsel’s challenges in getting med records in the time of COVID. I prefer him over some of the other options.
The above comment is 100% true. This judge will ignore 400 sick appointments and focus on a single well visit to deny you. My caretaker died a week before my hearing and he left me out to dry. I had 3 separate doctors cosign a medical opinion and this judge finds that unpersuasive – but two state medical consultants from the state who have never spoken to me, treated me or even met me – he thinks is more persuasive. Seeing how frequently he does this to others, may God have mercy on his soul. I have struggled so much and I pray he experiences the effect his decision had on my life when it’s time for his life review.
He should be reviewed by a high upper management. He denied more disability cases. He disregard what make the rules of disability. If all medical proof is there by md he seem to disregard md input. He denied those who need care and put other at risk cause they can’t get the care.