Laura S Havens, Tucson , Arizona Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Laura S Havens has disposed 613 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 613 dispostions, 84 were dismissed, 276 were approved and 253 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Laura S Havens has approved in STOCKTON for the 2010 fiscal year is 15%. The information below for Judge Laura S Havens was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOCKTON | 2010 | 613 | 529 | 253 | 276 | 14% | 45% | 41% |
STOCKTON | 2012 | 41 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 2% | 49% | 49% |
TUCSON | 2012 | 701 | 615 | 291 | 324 | 12% | 46% | 42% |
TUCSON | 2015 | 630 | 564 | 270 | 294 | 10% | 47% | 43% |
TUCSON | 2014 | 746 | 613 | 296 | 317 | 18% | 42% | 40% |
TUCSON | 2013 | 698 | 592 | 302 | 290 | 15% | 42% | 43% |
STOCKTON | 2011 | 763 | 653 | 309 | 344 | 14% | 45% | 40% |
TUCSON | 2016 | 435 | 386 | 174 | 212 | 11% | 49% | 40% |
TUCSON | 2017 | 506 | 446 | 189 | 257 | 12% | 51% | 37% |
TUCSON | 2018 | 210 | 183 | 92 | 91 | 13% | 43% | 44% |
TUCSON | 2019 | 458 | 378 | 150 | 228 | 17% | 50% | 33% |
TUCSON | 2020 | 285 | 242 | 99 | 143 | 15% | 50% | 35% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Laura S Havens | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in STOCKTON | 19% | 45% | 36% |
All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
I honestly do not know which way this is going to go. I have been scraping the bottom for over two years, Considering the personal things we discussed she was extremely kind. Like I said regardless she was very kind.
Schizophrenic claimant with 3 suicide attempts- the last of which involved stabbing herself in the chest and then throwing herself from the third story window of her apartment complex. All doctors document multiple marked limitations, including the post-hearing CE. All opinions rejected. This judge found this woman not disabled and perfectly capable of working.
I am believing that God will be at work getting this hearing judge to hear and see the truth. That she will not be biased, but base everything on the evidence and nothung but the proof.
I thank God in advance for being in control and the Judge for not being biased.