Mary Ann Poulose, Nhc chicago , Orland park , Illinois , Illinois Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Mary Ann Poulose has disposed 491 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. Out of those 491 dispostions, 97 were dismissed, 217 were approved and 177 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Mary Ann Poulose has approved in CHICAGO for the 2010 fiscal year is 17%. The information below for Judge Mary Ann Poulose was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHICAGO | 2010 | 491 | 394 | 177 | 217 | 20% | 44% | 36% |
ORLAND PARK | 2010 | 39 | 39 | 23 | 16 | 0% | 41% | 59% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2012 | 554 | 481 | 298 | 183 | 13% | 33% | 54% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2015 | 465 | 287 | 172 | 115 | 38% | 25% | 37% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2014 | 502 | 391 | 255 | 136 | 22% | 27% | 51% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2013 | 479 | 369 | 239 | 130 | 23% | 27% | 50% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2011 | 523 | 463 | 264 | 199 | 11% | 38% | 50% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2016 | 421 | 163 | 101 | 62 | 61% | 15% | 24% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2017 | 212 | 175 | 97 | 78 | 17% | 37% | 46% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2018 | 103 | 98 | 55 | 43 | 5% | 42% | 53% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2019 | 342 | 289 | 192 | 97 | 15% | 28% | 56% |
NHC CHICAGO | 2020 | 295 | 245 | 156 | 89 | 17% | 30% | 53% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Mary Ann Poulose | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in CHICAGO | 19% | 43% | 38% |
All ALJs in ILLINOIS | 17% | 43% | 40% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
12 Comments
Overly upset about my decision this judge has made learning that she is a former attorney turned judge judge Poulose really do not understand the cases or people she making decisions for maybe age has something to do with it I do not live in the Chicago IL area and she was my judge and looking through my paper work she does not ask the right questions or hyperthetical questions like she never asked “Do you do those activities on or off your medications” she never ask about medications anyway so how do she determines who has a disability claim or determines if you are not disabled when she does not ask the real questions.
Some people’s are saying negative stuff about judge Poulsbo but she was my judge and i don’t agree to this nagstivety . She seems fair I don’t know what went on in your case but something went wrong may be your evident toward your case or you lied about something and she called you out on it. Look before my case I Google this judge and i came across all this negativity about her and when my court date came around I was soooo scared that this judge so I went in the court room nervous and shaking in my shoes but I was truthful to the answers she asked. Then with all be in said she was not a bad judge so stop making people’s nervous and scared with all this back lash if your case went wrong with her for what ever reason but if your not gone tell the entire story of your case to the point of the negative stuff keep your thought to yourself because it is terrifying to someone who has this judge for there case. I don’t mean any harm I just know what the negativity did to me.
She does not like to listen if you are sick. She only respects the social security administration, she is the worse judge. Very strong. She thinks that the people lie and invent what the disability people is suffering
took the time to explain the law to me so I understood it. explained that if I did not have medical records before my insurance date ended I was not going to get disability. she spent time to help me figure out where I went to the doctor and then said she would try to get those records. don’t think i’ll get disabilty based on what she said, but at least she cares enough to try.
Polouse doesnt know a hole from a apple extremly incompitant as a judge or human bieng and should step down from the podeum she sits on for she unfit to judge others the worst jugde would nt trust her with a tooth pick
She is terrible, god awful judge. Its nice that SSA employees defend the indefensible.
Judge Poulose is one smart judge with a lot of Social Security experience. She really knows the law and weighs the evidence fairly. Not every doctor is believable and she is able to explain why. She is very skilled at getting to the heart of the issues.
Has no heart. Is not sympathetic with respect to terminal cases.
The ALJ is not competent!!! She ignores evidence, blows off treating source opinions, uses poor judgement and is prone to be long winded. She needs to be removed.
She is much more prone to deny in spite of good medical evidence. She makes a habit of dismissing treating source opinions even when they match the evidence as a whole.