Mary P Parnow, San diego , San francisco , San jose , Tucson , California , California , California , Arizona Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Mary P Parnow has disposed 233 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 233 dispostions, 37 were dismissed, 165 were approved and 31 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Mary P Parnow has approved in OAKLAND for the 2010 fiscal year is 16%. The information below for Judge Mary P Parnow was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAKLAND | 2010 | 154 | 127 | 13 | 114 | 18% | 74% | 8% |
| SAN JOSE | 2010 | 233 | 196 | 31 | 165 | 16% | 71% | 13% |
| OAKLAND | 2012 | 504 | 407 | 172 | 235 | 19% | 47% | 34% |
| OAKLAND | 2015 | 155 | 95 | 38 | 57 | 39% | 37% | 25% |
| SAN DIEGO | 2015 | 170 | 157 | 67 | 90 | 8% | 53% | 39% |
| TUCSON | 2015 | 134 | 117 | 44 | 73 | 13% | 54% | 33% |
| OAKLAND | 2014 | 384 | 313 | 127 | 186 | 18% | 48% | 33% |
| OAKLAND | 2013 | 504 | 376 | 162 | 214 | 25% | 42% | 32% |
| OAKLAND | 2011 | 502 | 430 | 147 | 283 | 14% | 56% | 29% |
| SAN JOSE | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| OAKLAND | 2016 | 110 | 85 | 35 | 50 | 23% | 45% | 32% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2016 | 256 | 195 | 86 | 109 | 24% | 43% | 34% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2017 | 419 | 337 | 140 | 197 | 20% | 47% | 33% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2018 | 174 | 127 | 60 | 67 | 27% | 39% | 34% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2019 | 354 | 276 | 141 | 135 | 22% | 38% | 40% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2020 | 305 | 256 | 113 | 143 | 16% | 47% | 37% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary P Parnow | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in OAKLAND | 22% | 46% | 32% |
| All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
11 Comments
I found her to be kind, respectful, thorough, and fair. She was genuinely interested in me and my daily struggles. She listened closely, asked clear questions and even kept me past the allotted time to hear my answers. I was very pleased with the process, with her and my outcome.
She makes me wait five months until she sends me a rejection letter. I am outraged at how low life criminals with prison and drug records who fake schizophrenia to get a free check that goes to the dope man on the first of every month. Check out 17th Street and Imperial Avenue near St Vincent De Paul-Father Joe Villages. When honest people have paid into the system and honestly need help they are continuously denied. I often wonder about people in high positions.
Why does the web sites show mixed comments? If a person doesn’t click on site, a person can get the wrong impression of that judge.not right to mix a positive comment with a negative comment. Thats for all judges.
Unfair and tricky.
I just posted 5 stars for Judge Parnow, let me add ,I had two hearings ( the second a supplemental) and I am waiting for her decision. And I still give her a good rating.. why..because she gave me a good caring vibe.. My only HOPE of change is a answer ” if yes” to hear it in court.. then waiting for the letter of confirmation wont be so hard and stressful.. good luck all.
I’ve tried to post before.. let me try again. If your Honest and prepared and deserving, I belive Judge Mary Parnow will rule in your favor. I feel she.is fair and open minded.
This ALJ used to be a dealer — for an amended onset you could likely get a win. Now she’s becoming quite conservative, denying lots of cases and obfuscating her decisions, even for cases she would have granted a year ago!
She is OK. If you play ball and amend your disability onset, she will likely grant in your favor. However, amending your onset will reduce your backpay substantially.
She have a good heart
To clear up the prior post. Her decisions are gutless
ALJ is gutless.