Michael D Radensky, San bernardino , California Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Michael D Radensky has disposed 792 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in NORWALK, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 792 dispostions, 125 were dismissed, 247 were approved and 420 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Michael D Radensky has approved in NORWALK for the 2010 fiscal year is 14%. The information below for Judge Michael D Radensky was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2010 | 792 | 667 | 420 | 247 | 16% | 31% | 53% |
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2012 | 753 | 640 | 409 | 231 | 15% | 31% | 54% |
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2015 | 606 | 506 | 323 | 183 | 17% | 30% | 53% |
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2014 | 550 | 445 | 274 | 171 | 19% | 31% | 50% |
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2013 | 562 | 474 | 331 | 143 | 16% | 25% | 59% |
| SAN BERNARDINO | 2011 | 734 | 627 | 420 | 207 | 15% | 28% | 57% |
| NORWALK | 2016 | 467 | 367 | 217 | 150 | 21% | 32% | 46% |
| NORWALK | 2017 | 455 | 356 | 215 | 141 | 22% | 31% | 47% |
| NORWALK | 2018 | 205 | 155 | 89 | 66 | 24% | 32% | 43% |
| NORWALK | 2019 | 353 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 21% | 37% | 41% |
| NORWALK | 2020 | 306 | 263 | 146 | 117 | 14% | 38% | 48% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael D Radensky | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in NORWALK | 17% | 48% | 36% |
| All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
8 Comments
You will burn in hell Jewdensky! Just the same way your ancestors did in the 40s! Mark my words! Karma is a b*tch!
How do we all get together and start a class action lawsuit against this guy?
Just look at his numbers to see how poorly he does his job, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have been denied by any other judge.
His prejudice obviously plays a role in his decisions.
He omitted things in his report about my condition to deny me,… there’s no legitimate reason I should have been denied.
This judge is awesome!!!!! Whoever says otherwise probably didn’t have proper documentation or didn’t have enough medical evidence…we were given a fully favorable decision on a child’s ssi benifits and child’s cases are often more complicated…He was very very nice and understanding towards my sons inability to remain still and was very professional and handled my sons case very well!!! after reading comments from previous claimants making it seem like he was a horrible person I can honestly say that those reviews are wrong! There had to be a reason he didn’t approve it and only you know why…if you are really disabled this judge isn’t going to question it he is very honest in his decision making!! Way to go judge Radensky!!!!
Judge Radensky reviewed my case in 2008. I too have been through the “medical nightmare” that life puts us all in – seven spine surgeries, one shoulder surgery, countless medicines and thearapy. While I feel that my hearing may have been stacked to illicit reactions from me, the reviewed, it was nothing but fair. That’s not to say others in need won’t be denied. Mistakes happen, not a single being is capable of being perfect. However, I feel with 100% certainty that Judge Radensky is completely honest in his assessment of us and his attempt to do his job – judging us, the people.
Sometimes people need some proof of the claims of others. Here’s the proof I can give you. I leave my property, which is owned 100% by me in Priest River Idaho, where my parents have resided for the last 20 years at my expense. I paid for it while I was healthy, with legitimate funds, to ensure my parents would have a place to lay their heads as they travel through the “golden years”.
This week, the week of March 27, 2017, My father, whom I hate and love, like and dislike, want to hug and kick at the same time, is in need of a new heart. He has needed it since the early 80’s. If we as a medical society have progressed to a point where its possible to give him said heart, I will leave 100% of said property (14-15 acres in the beautiful, and I mean BEAUTIFUL, Priest River Idaho in the hands of Judge Michael Radensky to pay for the cost of said procedure. Note that it is a prime piece of land all would envy. Love One Person
very understanding and meticulous regarding his reading of your case file. If you are trying to hide something he will find it. He read statements from my file that were from when I was 20 years old more than 16 years ago and agreed with the attending physician. I think he gets a bad rap for doing his job well. if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about.
Not enough room here to state all of Radensky’s blatant lies! Never even reviewed my medical records because they’re “older” and I have no medical or income, so I CANNOT afford to see a Dr. Mountains of evidence MORE than proving several severe health issues easily amounting to a disability. He made ALL kinds of false statements and assumptions instead of asking me questions. He gave NO WEIGHT to the opinion of the physician I saw most recently because he’s ONLY a PA, even though he works under the direct supervision of a Dr. This man is an IMBECILE who’s apparently only concerned with maintaining the HIGHEST DENIAL RATE ANYWHERE of 61%! Almost DOUBLE that of ALL OTHER ALJ’s in the entire nation!The average in CA. is ONLY 34% and his own office is ONLY 49%!
I have more than enough medical evidence to back up my claim. Stated things in his ruling that i never said. So now thanks to degenerative disc disease and Judge Radensky we will loose the last thing our family has our home I wonder how you can sleep at night after sitting and listening and watching a so blatently broken person in every way possible and then deny them. Now my family and i will be homeless thanks for that. I hope god has mercy on your soul !!!!