Michael D Shilling, Tupelo , Mississippi Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Michael D Shilling has disposed 44 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in TOPEKA KS, KANSAS. Out of those 44 dispostions, 10 were dismissed, 15 were approved and 19 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Michael D Shilling has approved in TOPEKA KS for the 2010 fiscal year is 25%. The information below for Judge Michael D Shilling was last updated on 10/01/2021.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOPEKA KS | 2010 | 44 | 34 | 19 | 15 | 23% | 34% | 43% |
| TUPELO | 2010 | 477 | 433 | 251 | 182 | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2012 | 581 | 488 | 357 | 131 | 16% | 23% | 61% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2015 | 506 | 398 | 301 | 97 | 21% | 19% | 59% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2014 | 502 | 388 | 302 | 86 | 23% | 17% | 60% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2013 | 530 | 446 | 330 | 116 | 16% | 22% | 62% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2011 | 575 | 507 | 356 | 151 | 12% | 26% | 62% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2016 | 491 | 382 | 291 | 91 | 22% | 19% | 59% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2017 | 464 | 349 | 263 | 86 | 25% | 19% | 57% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2018 | 219 | 180 | 134 | 46 | 18% | 21% | 61% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2019 | 424 | 333 | 249 | 84 | 21% | 20% | 59% |
| TOPEKA KS | 2020 | 291 | 219 | 169 | 50 | 25% | 17% | 58% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael D Shilling | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in TOPEKA KS | 23% | 28% | 50% |
| All ALJs in KANSAS | 20% | 37% | 44% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
15 Comments
What is unemolyable? then u seniev my case.I gave up a good job.The person that said jobs I couls do 3 ..Lawyer asked with my limetATRions 00.aND STILL DENIED /. can i work there .seems easy justv say
he only accepts government exam. treating phys are “inconsistent with the record.” very little reasoning in his decisions . he does what his masters in Washington tell him to do. may he receive the same justice that he hands out is my sincere prayer. at least he keeps the hearings short so that he will not have to be confused with facts when he writes his short form denials.
He should be removed. He is not qualified and he is causing irreparable harm to the claimants who must go before him as well as the Social Security Administration.
Never worked a day in his life and no compassion for people who need help better be on death bed before he even thinks about it.his day of judgement is coming. Bad judge
Bad judge dishonest frauder
Ur a liar and a fraud er u state info in ur denial letter that wasn’t even said at hearing to ur advantage
YOU WEAR AN AMERICAN FLAG AND DENY 100% VETERANS, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF
AWFUL JUDGE POS
VERY BAD JUDGE DISHONEST FRAUDER
Great Judge!