Michael Friedman, New york , Queens , White plains , New york , New york , New york Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Michael Friedman has disposed 782 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in BUFFALO, NEW YORK. Out of those 782 dispostions, 147 were dismissed, 423 were approved and 212 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Michael Friedman has approved in BUFFALO for the 2010 fiscal year is 17%. The information below for Judge Michael Friedman was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEW YORK | 2010 | 782 | 635 | 212 | 423 | 19% | 54% | 27% |
| NEW YORK | 2012 | 722 | 595 | 340 | 255 | 18% | 35% | 47% |
| NEW YORK | 2015 | 634 | 489 | 296 | 193 | 23% | 30% | 47% |
| NEW YORK | 2014 | 579 | 448 | 284 | 164 | 23% | 28% | 49% |
| NEW YORK | 2013 | 789 | 666 | 361 | 305 | 16% | 39% | 46% |
| NEW YORK | 2011 | 705 | 540 | 233 | 307 | 23% | 44% | 33% |
| NEW YORK | 2016 | 167 | 145 | 94 | 51 | 13% | 31% | 56% |
| QUEENS | 2016 | 15 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 0% | 80% | 20% |
| WHITE PLAINS | 2016 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 14% | 45% | 41% |
| BUFFALO | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| NEW YORK | 2017 | 308 | 224 | 114 | 110 | 27% | 36% | 37% |
| QUEENS | 2017 | 98 | 70 | 34 | 36 | 29% | 37% | 35% |
| WHITE PLAINS | 2017 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| NEW YORK | 2018 | 78 | 63 | 33 | 30 | 19% | 38% | 42% |
| QUEENS | 2018 | 163 | 136 | 70 | 66 | 17% | 40% | 43% |
| NEW YORK | 2019 | 114 | 83 | 35 | 48 | 27% | 42% | 31% |
| QUEENS | 2019 | 215 | 178 | 79 | 99 | 17% | 46% | 37% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Friedman | No Stats for FY2019 | ||
| All ALJs in BUFFALO | 19% | 41% | 40% |
| All ALJs in NEW YORK | 19% | 48% | 33% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
this judge is one of the worst. Most of his decisions are either dismissed or denied. In fact, he was taken off the bench for a while because his stats were in question. However, this dinosaur was brought back because the federal government is backed up and short staffed. During my hearing, he was very patronizing and sarcastic. In my “unfavorable decision” there was no specific reason for my denial. Just a lot of embellishment. Between this alj’s bad reputation and my strong medical evidence, I might be able to get his decision remanded by the Appeals Council.
going before judge Friedman … any information on him ?