Michael J Kopicki, Ft lauderdale , Nhc baltimore , Pasadena , Florida , Maryland , California Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Michael J Kopicki has disposed 147 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in FRESNO, CALIFORNIA. Out of those 147 dispostions, 3 were dismissed, 60 were approved and 84 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Michael J Kopicki has approved in FRESNO for the 2010 fiscal year is 19%. The information below for Judge Michael J Kopicki was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRESNO | 2010 | 147 | 144 | 84 | 60 | 2% | 41% | 57% |
| PASADENA | 2010 | 484 | 397 | 132 | 265 | 18% | 55% | 27% |
| PASADENA | 2012 | 605 | 507 | 233 | 274 | 16% | 45% | 39% |
| FT LAUDERDALE | 2015 | 69 | 36 | 13 | 23 | 48% | 33% | 19% |
| PASADENA | 2015 | 307 | 273 | 117 | 156 | 11% | 51% | 38% |
| PASADENA | 2014 | 520 | 436 | 175 | 261 | 16% | 50% | 34% |
| PASADENA | 2013 | 553 | 446 | 188 | 258 | 19% | 47% | 34% |
| PASADENA | 2011 | 606 | 483 | 202 | 281 | 20% | 46% | 33% |
| FT LAUDERDALE | 2016 | 206 | 159 | 68 | 91 | 23% | 44% | 33% |
| NHC BALTIMORE | 2016 | 230 | 186 | 76 | 110 | 19% | 48% | 33% |
| NHC BALTIMORE | 2017 | 455 | 363 | 144 | 219 | 20% | 48% | 32% |
| NHC BALTIMORE | 2018 | 177 | 138 | 66 | 72 | 22% | 41% | 37% |
| NHC BALTIMORE | 2019 | 291 | 227 | 105 | 122 | 22% | 42% | 36% |
| NHC BALTIMORE | 2020 | 280 | 226 | 118 | 108 | 19% | 39% | 42% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J Kopicki | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in FRESNO | 18% | 41% | 41% |
| All ALJs in CALIFORNIA | 19% | 45% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
A fairly good judge. I have appeared in front of Judge Kopicki a number of times and I find him to be intelligent, sincere, and thorough, even in cases he turned down. If a case he turned down is remanded to him he has been fair about reconsidering his prior decision.
He is neither liberal nor conservative in his decisions.
On occasion he has prejudged a case and digs in his heels during the hearing, but usually he is open-minded. I have not seen him to be cyncial.
Judge was fair
Terrible judge. Ignores evidence; twists statements, and is one of the most cynical individuals I have ever dealt with. Believes he knows more than doctors’ do. I sincerely feet sorry for any disabled individual that has to go in front of him. Personally speaking, I don’t think he’s that intelligent and informed medically, despite what I am sure he believes of himself.