Nancy L Brock, Hattiesburg , Mississippi Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Nancy L Brock has disposed 591 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA. Out of those 591 dispostions, 59 were dismissed, 235 were approved and 297 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Nancy L Brock has approved in GREENSBORO for the 2010 fiscal year is 13%. The information below for Judge Nancy L Brock was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HATTIESBURG | 2010 | 591 | 532 | 297 | 235 | 10% | 40% | 50% |
HATTIESBURG | 2012 | 699 | 600 | 360 | 240 | 14% | 34% | 52% |
GREENSBORO | 2015 | 84 | 67 | 31 | 36 | 20% | 43% | 37% |
HATTIESBURG | 2015 | 377 | 343 | 187 | 156 | 9% | 41% | 50% |
HATTIESBURG | 2014 | 563 | 461 | 302 | 159 | 18% | 28% | 54% |
HATTIESBURG | 2013 | 705 | 589 | 339 | 250 | 16% | 35% | 48% |
HATTIESBURG | 2011 | 690 | 617 | 356 | 261 | 11% | 38% | 52% |
GREENSBORO | 2016 | 431 | 368 | 182 | 186 | 15% | 43% | 42% |
GREENSBORO | 2017 | 410 | 343 | 125 | 218 | 16% | 53% | 30% |
GREENSBORO | 2018 | 170 | 142 | 53 | 89 | 16% | 52% | 31% |
GREENSBORO | 2019 | 305 | 255 | 76 | 179 | 16% | 59% | 25% |
GREENSBORO | 2020 | 254 | 220 | 62 | 158 | 13% | 62% | 24% |
AVERAGE TIME
Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
---|---|---|---|
Nancy L Brock | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
All ALJs in GREENSBORO | 16% | 55% | 29% |
All ALJs in NORTH CAROLINA | 15% | 50% | 35% |
All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
10 Comments
Judge Brock was great judge.
Ive worked all my life. When I could not continue to work, mentally and physically disabled, It’s hard for me to talk. My phone hearing I was physically sick bc I was so nervous. She did make me feel comfortable talking to her and that helped me explain better.
I’d like to thank her for listening to my case .
I had judge brock she an amazing judge heartfelt and warming listening to my testimony asked me all the questions I don’t know why u guys bashing her for not approving u I received fully favourable after 2 months I’m 45 with a mile list long of medical problems I’m very thankful for judge brock ! Even tho I was in hospital I kept my phone hearing when I was getting upset she calmed me judge brock is a very amazing judge she fair n listens to every detail
I just have a problem with ALJ Brock does not take in the total medical record of clients. As well as her decisions do not reflect testimony. in other words she lies in her decisions!
I personally have nothing bad to say about this judge. My only thing is why has it been going on 4 months next month to get a decision after my disability hearing. I honestly didn’t think it would take this long. It took 3 years to get a hearing and I’m still waiting. I guess time will tell. Good luck to everyone who deserves it.
Judge Brock is a very fair and smart Judge. She was well prepared had obviously read my entire case. I received a FULLY FAVORABLE decision.
Very fair judge. Asks lots of questions and will refer to expert vocational witness for job related questions. You need to be truthful with this judge as she will look up your answers in your medical records. I recieved my approval the day af court verbally.
I have heard complaints about this ALJ being intoxicated in the past; my understanding is that this situation is under control now. I’ve had a number of hearings with her in the past couple of years and she always seemed fine and well prepared. She doesn’t usually ask for opening or closing statements. She will cover most of the important stuff in a general way and then let rep follow up on specifics. She will award a solid case. She does often run late in starting hearings.
I would like to thank Judge Brock for finally approving disabitity for a very Good friend of mine that almost lost his foot due to waiting for 3 years for disability we appreciate you thanks!
I requested that the Appeals Council reopen a case where an unrepresented client went before her. They agreed!!
The Judge said that the client was a secretary and performed someother job that she never did. Also, the client was 3 months away from turning 55, and she would have grided out with the light RFC that the Judge gave her. However, the Judge in her discreation found her to be 54, and denied her case. Also, the Judge never considered several of the claimant’s medically determinable impairments.
This Judge really doesn’t need to be doing Hearings. I never had a Representative but the Representative that was with her before me laughed on the Hearing date about how the Judge had been drinking. I do not drink but I really don’t know why our SSA allows a Judge under the infulence to listen to cases.. This Judge was literally falling on the desk, speach slurred and I was amazed this woman was going to make a decision on me that would affect the rest of my life. Of course I got denied but she had no clue what was going on that day and I get a denial because of her inability to even stay focused on my Hearing… Thanks Judge Brock (maybe I would have done better if I would have come intoxicated to the Hearing?)