1 based on 1 reviews

1 Comment

  1. Steve says:

    This ALJ blatantly distorts the evidence in his opinions, citing activities that were performed prior to disability in an effort to portray people as less-disabled, ignoring huge swathes of abnormal findings to point to normal findings of suspect relevancy to the case, and clearly has little to no understanding of mental disability. Go into a hearing with this ALJ prepared to appeal a ridiculous finding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *