Penny Loucas, Springfield ma , Massachusetts Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Penny Loucas has disposed 460 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in CLEVELAND, OHIO. Out of those 460 dispostions, 90 were dismissed, 127 were approved and 243 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Penny Loucas has approved in CLEVELAND for the 2010 fiscal year is 19%. The information below for Judge Penny Loucas was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPRINGFIELD MA | 2010 | 460 | 370 | 243 | 127 | 20% | 28% | 53% |
| CLEVELAND | 2012 | 171 | 138 | 111 | 27 | 19% | 16% | 65% |
| SPRINGFIELD MA | 2012 | 238 | 180 | 149 | 31 | 24% | 13% | 63% |
| CLEVELAND | 2015 | 446 | 348 | 245 | 103 | 22% | 23% | 55% |
| CLEVELAND | 2014 | 328 | 223 | 180 | 43 | 32% | 13% | 55% |
| CLEVELAND | 2013 | 344 | 283 | 226 | 57 | 18% | 17% | 66% |
| SPRINGFIELD MA | 2011 | 408 | 332 | 267 | 65 | 19% | 16% | 65% |
| CLEVELAND | 2016 | 251 | 188 | 136 | 52 | 25% | 21% | 54% |
| CLEVELAND | 2017 | 270 | 207 | 117 | 90 | 23% | 33% | 43% |
| CLEVELAND | 2018 | 177 | 135 | 73 | 62 | 24% | 35% | 41% |
| CLEVELAND | 2019 | 389 | 321 | 202 | 119 | 17% | 31% | 52% |
| CLEVELAND | 2020 | 131 | 106 | 64 | 42 | 19% | 32% | 49% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penny Loucas | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in CLEVELAND | 16% | 45% | 39% |
| All ALJs in OHIO | 17% | 45% | 38% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
9 Comments
I never ever had a hearing from my phone in my lifetime! I got to do that because of Covid19, I was well prepared and taught about what I should share and what I shouldn’t share ECT… I had 3 hearing in my life so I wasn’t expecting anything really and didn’t actually care of this outcome but I was scheduled so I at least wanted to give myself a shot, I never had a chance to share much, she couldn’t hear me and made me spell and repeat doctor and hospital names a few time, finally she decided to rescheduled, I couldn’t quite make up thetype of judge that she was nor what she taught of my case…
This woman is a bias judge; she denied my claim stating things that had absolutely nothing to do with the claim; since I can grocery shop, I am not disabled; I was making arrangements to move to warmer climate and because I could make the arrangements, I was not disabled; I have essential tremors so moving around and using limbs is a challenge; she claimed it was minimal and I could work; I can’t walk too far, I can’t not shake when I write – but it’s minimal. Apparently, she doesn’t understand that the more one uses limbs, more shaking occurs. I also felt she discriminated because I am a single, gay white male. Surely she will rot in hell (if not, she should). Not happy with her at all (nor with the useless lawyer who did nothing for the case – he was afraid of her).
She should be ashamed.
This judge acts like she’s giving you the money. I’ve worked 30 yrs in the same field
now my back, hips & legs are done. She says I can still work, doing what? Working a minimum wage job to care for myself & daughter. This system is flawed, ppl addicted to drugs & alcohol have no issue with being approved, hardworking ppl are subjected to having to fight for benefits. To say I’m displeased with her judgement is an understatement.
BRILLIANT..Judge Loucus has figured out a way to determine the differences between..Educated Pain and Non.Educated Pain – Educated Mental Illness and Non.Educated Mental Illness – Educated Disabilities and Non. Educated Disabilities.
BRAVO
Excellent skills in picking apart the information presented in order to make facts appear meaningless…Powerful
Judge Loucas is very knowledgeable about the law concerning disability. She looks and asks you about your complete work and medical histories. Your lawyer needs to be very prepared to countering and follow her logic of applying the laws to your case. If you can do ANY type of work, you will not prevail in her courtroom.
THIS JUDGE IS INSANE. IS THERE A WAY TO GIVE A NEGATIVE RATING? ARROGANT, DISHONEST, MISGUIDED
Good luck