Preston MitchellOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2018 *fiscal year, Judge Preston Mitchell has disposed 18 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH. Out of those 18 dispostions, 4 were dismissed, 9 were approved and 5 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Preston Mitchell has approved in SALT LAKE CITY for the 2018 fiscal year is 16%. The information below for Judge Preston Mitchell was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALT LAKE CITY | 2018 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 22% | 50% | 28% |
| SALT LAKE CITY | 2019 | 422 | 343 | 155 | 188 | 19% | 45% | 37% |
| SALT LAKE CITY | 2020 | 343 | 289 | 152 | 137 | 16% | 40% | 44% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preston Mitchell | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in SALT LAKE CITY | 19% | 40% | 41% |
| All ALJs in UTAH | 19% | 40% | 41% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
4 Comments
A family friend who has been a hard working man his whole life but can no longer work, appeared in front of Judge Mitchell, who proceeded to rule that a list of disabilities two pages long were not really impairments to his working. This man’s poor family now can’t make ends meet. Judge Mitchell … we will all meet THE judge one day.
Five star was wrong hes a 0 star but have to give 1 for comment
He should not be a law judge he is a joke and unfair and thinks he has Same problems and bases his wrong decisions from that . he does not consider medical records but only his childish questions.
This corrupt judge is a Cluster B personality disorder psychopath who did a long distance hearing with a broken disabled man. He was 1/2 hour late, then treated it like a joke with disgusting behaviour. He already had decided to deny the man, but was rude and condescending to him. He printed Libellous slander on the “unfavourable” decision and is guilty of malfeasance and misconduct.