3 based on 8 reviews

15 Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    I just want to let the public know be very aware that these comments are not always true and anyone including the judges family, friends, and associates can make anonymous comments. I don’t know this judge I just wanted to get this comment in.

  2. Paul L. Jenkins, Esq. says:

    Judge Palenske has been the recipient of some incredibly false and ridiculous critiques on this board. Firstly, her award rate is in line with the national average, which would itself indicate that she is applying the law faithfully and fairly. As a highly successful SSDI attorney, I have appeared before her many times. She rightly expects lawyers to fully and thoroughly present their cases. She listens more than she talks, and many of her colleagues on the Bench could learn from the thoughtful way in which she conducts her hearings. She is always respectful and courteous to each and every claimant, and always arrives at well reasoned legal conclusions regardless of whether the outcome is an award or a denial. If you have a good lawyer who follows Judge Palenske’s specific pre-hearing instructions, and takes the time to carefully develop your testimony in court, this judge will award your case, provided that the medical evidence supports the severity of your allegations. By all standards of judicial fairness, temperament, and preparation, Judge Palenske is a model ALJ.

  3. John Ward says:

    She made me feel very comfortable considering my health issues. I have a problem staying focused and communicating to people. I’m waiting for her decision and pray that it is favorable. This was written for me by Gwen Ward my wife.

  4. l gilchrease says:

    She fabricates, cherry-picks, and manipulates evidence to conform to a predetermined decision. Does not know the meaning of “Judge” and does not deserve the title.

  5. Atlanta Advocate says:

    One of the worst judges in this office. Doesn’t use vocational experts. Forgets to swear in witnesses. Sits on denials for months at a time. Will find the dumbest reasons to hold the record open in cases. For people that have waited years to have their cases heard, be prepared to wait even longer to hear back from her. Poor doesn’t properly describe the job that she does. Taxpayers definitely deserve more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.