Salena D Bowman-Davis, Nhc albuquerque , New mexico Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Salena D Bowman-Davis has disposed 393 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in MIAMI, FLORIDA. Out of those 393 dispostions, 225 were dismissed, 148 were approved and 20 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Salena D Bowman-Davis has approved in MIAMI for the 2010 fiscal year is 11%. The information below for Judge Salena D Bowman-Davis was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIAMI | 2010 | 393 | 168 | 20 | 148 | 57% | 38% | 5% |
| MIAMI | 2012 | 489 | 177 | 32 | 145 | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| MIAMI | 2015 | 480 | 366 | 146 | 220 | 24% | 46% | 30% |
| MIAMI | 2014 | 463 | 335 | 117 | 218 | 28% | 47% | 25% |
| MIAMI | 2013 | 506 | 373 | 145 | 228 | 26% | 45% | 29% |
| MIAMI | 2011 | 352 | 173 | 33 | 140 | 51% | 40% | 9% |
| MIAMI | 2016 | 517 | 423 | 127 | 296 | 18% | 57% | 25% |
| MIAMI | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| NHC ALBUQUERQUE | 2017 | 502 | 387 | 199 | 188 | 23% | 37% | 40% |
| NHC ALBUQUERQUE | 2018 | 138 | 86 | 50 | 36 | 38% | 26% | 36% |
| NHC ALBUQUERQUE | 2019 | 57 | 51 | 32 | 19 | 11% | 33% | 56% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salena D Bowman-Davis | No Stats for FY2019 | ||
| All ALJs in MIAMI | 19% | 49% | 33% |
| All ALJs in FLORIDA | 18% | 47% | 35% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
1 Comment
The 30% figure of cases approved is totally misleading. Judge Bowman-Davis has been the chief judge. I believe that the large number of dismissals results from her reviewing cases before they are assigned to a hearing judge, so that individuals who filed their Request for Hearing past the deadline, and without good cause, were dismissed early and can then re-file the claim. This is an improvement over prior practice where you would wait a year or more to have a hearing, only to find out that the assigned hearing judge dismissed the case. Note that of the cases she did hear, she approved 145 and denied 32. That, to me, sounds more correct. She is always prepared, respectful of claimants and attorneys, and calls them as she sees them without trying to be the advocate for the administration. To me a good judge is one who lets you present your case, then makes a decision based on the facts, even if it is against you. She is a good judge – and a very nice and polite at the same time.