Seymour FierOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Seymour Fier has disposed 308 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in QUEENS, NEW YORK. Out of those 308 dispostions, 53 were dismissed, 107 were approved and 148 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Seymour Fier has approved in QUEENS for the 2010 fiscal year is 20%. The information below for Judge Seymour Fier was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUEENS | 2010 | 308 | 255 | 148 | 107 | 17% | 35% | 48% |
| QUEENS | 2012 | 292 | 243 | 94 | 149 | 17% | 51% | 32% |
| QUEENS | 2014 | 115 | 96 | 35 | 61 | 17% | 53% | 30% |
| QUEENS | 2013 | 307 | 263 | 89 | 174 | 14% | 57% | 29% |
| QUEENS | 2011 | 279 | 224 | 118 | 106 | 20% | 38% | 42% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seymour Fier | No Stats for FY2011 | ||
| All ALJs in QUEENS | 19% | 50% | 31% |
| All ALJs in NEW YORK | 19% | 48% | 33% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
He completely ignored most of the medical evidence presented at my hearing. don’t care what your doctor said he goes by the ME and CE
This man is THE WORST example of an ALJ. VERY BIASED. He completely ignored most of the medical evidence presented at my hearing. His unfavorable decision was based on absurd arguments which had NOTHING to do with my case. Adding insult to injury, he went on to state that I was able to do construction related work (which I have NEVER done) when I can barely walk unassisted. I would love to know what kind of construction work he would be able to do with TEN (10) herniated discs! You are a disgrace to your profession, Mr. Fier!
Not a fair judge. Does not seem to like many of the rules and often sets his own rules. Pragmatic type, usually taking a strong position and not that open to persuasion even from his selected experts. He does not seem motivated by whether a case is remanded or even if there is a circuit decision on an issue. His stats are possibly worse than they appear. He tends to negotiate a strong arm amended onset date. He uses a quiet, slow methodical tone and rarely raises his voice.