Thomas W Erwin, Roanoke , Virginia Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Thomas W Erwin has disposed 553 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in CHARLESTON WV, WEST VIRGINIA. Out of those 553 dispostions, 36 were dismissed, 406 were approved and 111 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Thomas W Erwin has approved in CHARLESTON WV for the 2010 fiscal year is 18%. The information below for Judge Thomas W Erwin was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLESTON WV | 2010 | 553 | 517 | 111 | 406 | 7% | 73% | 20% |
| ROANOKE | 2012 | 565 | 468 | 152 | 316 | 17% | 56% | 27% |
| ROANOKE | 2015 | 473 | 416 | 173 | 243 | 12% | 51% | 37% |
| ROANOKE | 2014 | 454 | 392 | 146 | 246 | 14% | 54% | 32% |
| ROANOKE | 2013 | 478 | 411 | 154 | 257 | 14% | 54% | 32% |
| CHARLESTON WV | 2011 | 282 | 260 | 61 | 199 | 8% | 71% | 22% |
| ROANOKE | 2011 | 272 | 237 | 59 | 178 | 13% | 65% | 22% |
| ROANOKE | 2016 | 473 | 406 | 173 | 233 | 14% | 49% | 37% |
| ROANOKE | 2017 | 430 | 355 | 151 | 204 | 17% | 47% | 35% |
| ROANOKE | 2018 | 185 | 158 | 65 | 93 | 15% | 50% | 35% |
| ROANOKE | 2019 | 398 | 338 | 135 | 203 | 15% | 51% | 34% |
| ROANOKE | 2020 | 308 | 253 | 94 | 159 | 18% | 52% | 31% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas W Erwin | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in CHARLESTON WV | 16% | 45% | 39% |
| All ALJs in WEST VIRGINIA | 17% | 42% | 41% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
1 Comment
i was told how “fair this judge is” i actually felt like that may be true..until the day we met. he heard my son’s case, with OBVIOUS bias. we were unrepresented, but had very good evidence. several providers didn’t think we needed an attorney, because it is so clear that my son is disabled. from the very first question, i knew we were in trouble. this judge clearly believed that my son had concocted this idea, to what”get rich quick”? by social security?? his mind was made up before our hearing, and what he based that decision on, i have absolutely no idea. it certainly was not, evidence, or law!!! i have NOW retained an attorney for my son. it is a shame that this has become the racket that it has. i only fear i have wasted precious time that my son DOES NOT HAVE!!!!