Tom Duann, Norfolk , Norwalk , Virginia , California Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Tom Duann has disposed 572 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in ALBANY, NEW YORK. Out of those 572 dispostions, 62 were dismissed, 324 were approved and 186 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Tom Duann has approved in ALBANY for the 2010 fiscal year is 17%. The information below for Judge Tom Duann was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORFOLK | 2010 | 572 | 510 | 186 | 324 | 11% | 57% | 33% |
| NORFOLK | 2012 | 626 | 530 | 266 | 264 | 15% | 42% | 42% |
| NORFOLK | 2015 | 603 | 475 | 213 | 262 | 21% | 43% | 35% |
| NORFOLK | 2014 | 579 | 464 | 202 | 262 | 20% | 45% | 35% |
| NORFOLK | 2013 | 657 | 531 | 273 | 258 | 19% | 39% | 42% |
| NORFOLK | 2011 | 629 | 549 | 226 | 323 | 13% | 51% | 36% |
| NORFOLK | 2016 | 548 | 438 | 173 | 265 | 20% | 48% | 32% |
| ALBANY | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| NORFOLK | 2017 | 480 | 382 | 123 | 259 | 20% | 54% | 26% |
| NORFOLK | 2018 | 252 | 210 | 73 | 137 | 17% | 54% | 29% |
| NORFOLK | 2019 | 388 | 321 | 135 | 186 | 17% | 48% | 35% |
| NORWALK | 2020 | 286 | 237 | 79 | 158 | 17% | 55% | 28% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Duann | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in ALBANY | 17% | 47% | 36% |
| All ALJs in NEW YORK | 19% | 48% | 33% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
Tony Duann improperly denied my benefits I can receive it since May of 2008 per my request I wouldn’t to the Virginia Beach Virginia office and ask for a form to add on 20 my existing benefits this person denied my request along with my payments benefits that I’ve been receiving since May 2008 this was an improper judgement I am still looking for my payments from 20th April 2016 on going
This judge is very respectful and listened very patiently…..he allowed me to add more information regarding my case. I didn’t notice any negative behavior.
Too inexperienced for complex theory cases….whoosh…over him but good potential.Does not appear to be listening… Too interested in filling out his forms during testimony. He is improving but I wilt when I find he is the ALJ when there are ANY issues that are not covered by the usual boilerplate type case cites. :-/