William M ManicoOdar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge William M Manico has disposed 958 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in NHC FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA. Out of those 958 dispostions, 85 were dismissed, 621 were approved and 252 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge William M Manico has approved in NHC FALLS CHURCH for the 2010 fiscal year is 22%. The information below for Judge William M Manico was last updated on 04/28/2023.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2010 | 958 | 873 | 252 | 621 | 9% | 65% | 26% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2012 | 744 | 658 | 287 | 371 | 12% | 50% | 39% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2015 | 546 | 326 | 179 | 147 | 40% | 27% | 33% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2014 | 576 | 434 | 247 | 187 | 25% | 32% | 43% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2013 | 588 | 462 | 232 | 230 | 21% | 39% | 39% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2011 | 871 | 775 | 263 | 512 | 11% | 59% | 30% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2016 | 512 | 354 | 135 | 219 | 31% | 43% | 26% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2017 | 553 | 404 | 188 | 216 | 27% | 39% | 34% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2018 | 213 | 154 | 42 | 112 | 28% | 53% | 20% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2019 | 381 | 262 | 99 | 163 | 31% | 43% | 26% |
| NHC FALLS CHURCH | 2020 | 312 | 242 | 95 | 147 | 22% | 47% | 30% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| William M Manico | No Stats for FY2020 | ||
| All ALJs in NHC FALLS CHURCH | 18% | 45% | 37% |
| All ALJs in VIRGINIA | 18% | 43% | 39% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
2 Comments
He don’t listen to the claim and if your young he going to denial you he gave a decision in 3 weeks didn’t even read my medical records I had 1500 pages just don’t really care he gets 0 stars
This judge failed to take actual doctors notes and letters of support into consideration. He was very uninterested in our case and made us wait 6 months for a denial. I wish we would have had someone with the knowledge about mental disabilities and a fir judge that actually read our case. When we had the hearing it was very clear he had not even read the trial brief considering he had no idea where it was located in the file and had no idea what we were applying under!! If you have this judge I wish you the best!!