Windell R Owens, Chattanooga , Jackson , Tennessee , Mississippi Odar Office, Administrative Law Judge
For the 2010 *fiscal year, Judge Windell R Owens has disposed 153 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA. Out of those 153 dispostions, 25 were dismissed, 78 were approved and 50 were denied. This means that the percentage of depositions that Judge Windell R Owens has approved in BIRMINGHAM for the 2010 fiscal year is 14%. The information below for Judge Windell R Owens was last updated on 12/01/2022.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | *Fiscal Year | Total Depositions | Total Decisions | Total Denials | Total Awards | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRMINGHAM | 2010 | 153 | 128 | 50 | 78 | 16% | 51% | 33% |
| CHATTANOOGA | 2010 | 306 | 274 | 63 | 211 | 10% | 69% | 21% |
| BIRMINGHAM | 2012 | 497 | 423 | 150 | 273 | 15% | 55% | 30% |
| JACKSON | 2015 | 485 | 401 | 202 | 199 | 17% | 41% | 42% |
| JACKSON | 2014 | 503 | 411 | 182 | 229 | 18% | 46% | 36% |
| BIRMINGHAM | 2013 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0% | 13% | 87% |
| JACKSON | 2013 | 444 | 370 | 171 | 199 | 17% | 45% | 39% |
| BIRMINGHAM | 2011 | 489 | 428 | 169 | 259 | 12% | 53% | 35% |
| JACKSON | 2016 | 436 | 351 | 146 | 205 | 19% | 47% | 33% |
| JACKSON | 2017 | 284 | 244 | 96 | 148 | 14% | 52% | 34% |
AVERAGE TIME
| Dismissed | Approved | Denied | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Windell R Owens | No Stats for FY2017 | ||
| All ALJs in BIRMINGHAM | 18% | 43% | 39% |
| All ALJs in ALABAMA | 18% | 46% | 36% |
| All ALJs in the Nation | 18% | 45% | 38% |
3 Comments
Judge Owens is VERY thorough, but very fair! He is an excellent Judge in my opinion. As long as the claimant is honest and the rep is prepared, you have a good chance! He does numerous lengthy hypotheticals and asks for the rep’s legal theory before testimony.
I’ve had one hearing with this ALJ. He was very professional, calm, and gave claimant a very fair and complete hearing. His award rate has come down a bit over the last year. He will ask some general background questions and then will give you specific direction on how he wants the medical testimony developed. He asks a full range of hypotheticals. He ended up denying this claim for lack of supportive medical but it was still a very fair hearing and a well reasoned decision.
Very nice, took my conditions and feelings serious. Used all my Doctor’s reports instead of ce exam report.
Made me feel relaxed and at ease.
VE at hearing was also considerate.