ATLANTA-DOWNTOWN, Georgia Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Atlanta-downtown, GEORGIA, 29 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Atlanta-downtown, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 15 months. The average case processing time in Atlanta-downtown is 539 days. The Atlanta-downtown average for winning a SSI or SSD disability hearing is 43%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Atlanta-downtown ODAR office was last updated on 10/01/2021.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATLANTA DOWNTOWN | 29 | 15.0 months | 539 days | 1.9 | 19% | 43% | 38% |
| GEORGIA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| months | days | % | % |
537 Comments
The chances of getting a fair hearing before this Judge are not good. It almost appears he has a bias toward injured claimants. Any adverse medical opinion will be adopted in his decision. If there is not an adverse opinion in the record, he will send out for one. He is very courteous as he guts your case.
The chances of getting a fair hearing before this Judge are not good. It almost appears he has a bias toward injured claimants. Any adverse medical opinion will be adopted in his decision. If there is not an adverse opinion in the record, he will send out for one. He is very courteous as he guts your case.
The chances of getting a fair hearing before this Judge are not good. It almost appears he has a bias toward injured claimants. Any adverse medical opinion will be adopted in his decision. If there is not an adverse opinion in the record, he will send out for one. He is very courteous as he guts your case.
This judge have to remember one day he will be judged and it want be good....he deny peoples that is really sick and need help...You are one low down dirty man. Courteous he are that's what fake and sneaky people do laugh in your face while hurting you behind your back. I guess he was bullet at school and now he think he got power to hurt peoples but you hurting the wrong one.
This judge have to remember one day he will be judged and it want be good....he deny peoples that is really sick and need help...You are one low down dirty man. Courteous he are that's what fake and sneaky people do laugh in your face while hurting you behind your back. I guess he was bullet at school and now he think he got power to hurt peoples but you hurting the wrong one.
This judge have to remember one day he will be judged and it want be good....he deny peoples that is really sick and need help...You are one low down dirty man. Courteous he are that's what fake and sneaky people do laugh in your face while hurting you behind your back. I guess he was bullet at school and now he think he got power to hurt peoples but you hurting the wrong one.
I have an upcoming hearing and after reading the above comments I am scared my case will be denied. Any suggestions? I do have a Lawyer, but any comments would be greatly appreated.
I have an upcoming hearing and after reading the above comments I am scared my case will be denied. Any suggestions? I do have a Lawyer, but any comments would be greatly appreated.
I have an upcoming hearing and after reading the above comments I am scared my case will be denied. Any suggestions? I do have a Lawyer, but any comments would be greatly appreated.
I just had a hearing in front of him and he approved me on the spot! Remember if necessary, you can appeal the judges decision. I found the Judge to be rather caring and he took the time to listen and read the brief and any other information as he saw fit.
My wife is suffering from severe depression from losing our son in 1999 been in and out of institutions even a 6 month stay in Columbus whats wrong with this judge
I had a hearing with Him and he was extremely caring and really put my anxiety at ease to where I was able to explain myself and go into great detail of how bad my physical and psychological disabilities are. I was so scared for months before my hearing. I was mentally and physically exhausted. He took the time to listen to me and was so sweet to me. Thank you your Honor I now feel like a big heavy weight has been lifted off of my chest. God bless you!
I was very surprised with the judge, after reading these comments I'll admit I was worried about nothing. I found Judge Alexander to be very nice and seemed to really listen to what I had to say. He was pressed for time, but allowed my attorney to present the particulars about my case. After testifying and answering the questions he had, I was approved. Part of my case was not even presented due to missing doctor notes! I can only say to be prepared to testify. It's not just about a diagnosis but how the diagnosis affects you and your ability to work. A vocational expert will be there to testify about any work you may be able to do despite your disability. Make sure you have proper documentation also. You need to be under a doctors care, and not just go in with an opinion from a doctor.
Hi, I would like to say that I consider Judge Alexander to be a fair Judge. He asked detailed questions and actually listened to what I had to say. I thank him for approving my case. My only problem is that now that I'm approved, why is it taking so long to get the process started. I have been waiting over 2 1/2 years. My lawyer, Deborah Grossman, has expedited my case and we still have no results. I have lost everything I have waiting. I am single and have no one to help me. My mom has been doing her best but she only gets 969.00 a month in SS. She can no longer help. I can't afford to go see my doctor or the specialists. I can't afford to get my medication. I am in so much pain. I need to see my ENT because I'm afraid the cancer is back in my mouth , I have been suspecting it for about 6 months.
Judge Alexander saw me & immediately made the comment that he read what the Doctors said, but I was too young to be having all the problems I was. He then sent me to his Dr. who even said that I would not be able to lift over 20lbs, stand too much, squat, bend, put my arms above my head, climb stairs, and yet I was still denied. He had the date of my Disability incur switched to when I filed, even though I only was working because SS said I needed to work another year in order to even file, because I was short credits. I have General Anxiety Disorder, Hypothyroidism, Hypoglycemia, Hypertension, MVP, a partially paralyzed vocal chord, Tendonitis in both Wrist & Elbows, Tarsal tunnel in both Ankles, Arthritis in both knees, Scoliosis with Herrington rods, Degenerative disc Disease in my lower n upper Back & Cervical Lordosis, Bulging disc in my lower spine. I can not talk for more than 20 minutes or I will lose my voice. I can't walk for more than 30 minutes without hurting, I have to sit in a lounge position and even then my bottom falls asleep & hurts. I take medicine for my Pain, stay fatigued, trouble with my Memory & Hair loss, constipation, weight gain, mood swings. According to the Judge & the Vocational Rehabilitation rep. that called into my 2nd Appeal I can work certain jobs, mind you I have a High School education and my job experience is in Child care & retail, 2 jobs I can't do again. All I can say for certain is that I am a Christian and I know that God has me facing All of this for a reason. The Judge had a Chance to be fair, but he wasn't, but I am not going to hold it against him. I forgive him, after all he will have to stand before the Lord one day & will have to answer for the Judging he does.
Thank you Judge for approving my case after it was denied twice and gave me the chance to tell my story to you and how this injury have affected me and my wife life. I am vey grateful to you for helping me receive my benefits. This shows me that the SSA system is fair if you have your medical records and a SSA attorney with you when you go to a hearing. Great Judge to have to tell your truth to him. And you do not have to be nervous at the hearing.
Judge Kyle C Alexander, You gave me a few off the wall jobs that your Specialist said I could do. I'm asking you to help me find one of them, mind you one that I don't have to talk too much, because as I stated in my previous message I sent and as you well know, I lose my voice because of a partially paralyzed vocal chord. You said in your Denial I refused to get surgery to correct it, but what you didn't ask is why I didn't want to get the surgery. If I had the surgery there were risks not worth taking....I need you to show me the job, where I don't have to worry about my Back, knees, or feet hurting and burning from just daily living.... I want you to please remember that I am Human. I didn't ask for all the health issues I have, that when compacted together cause more pain that I Pray you or a Loved one ever has to face. If you can find me one of those jobs I can do with all of the daily obstacles I face, then please let me know what it is.
Ju Judge : Kyle C Alexander. 04/11/19 6:12 pm I have been in front of this judge,for one he's very rude doesn't listen actually I couldn't even talk I'm 57 years old and I have serious neck (already had one surgery) repair disc degeneration didn't go that well more degeneration in my spine and couple other things that has caused me not to work, anyway denied 2 time same thing 3 time same thing happened should not even be on the bored to hold folks future in his hands it you get this judge good luck because your probably not going to get approved I think all the disability lawyers need to do what ever it takes to get him off the board and hope he never has something as painful as we are going through,he will meet his maker and I hope he as hard on him as he is us that really need disability, he doesn't need to be in this position.
Yea, This judge is dishonest.
Yea, This judge is dishonest.
Yea, This judge is dishonest.
Apparently this ALJ is not willing to support veterans with PTSD. Client has over 650 pages of VA records supporting his severe impairment; this ALJ did not mention them in his decision.
Apparently this ALJ is not willing to support veterans with PTSD. Client has over 650 pages of VA records supporting his severe impairment; this ALJ did not mention them in his decision.
Apparently this ALJ is not willing to support veterans with PTSD. Client has over 650 pages of VA records supporting his severe impairment; this ALJ did not mention them in his decision.
Apparently this ALJ is not willing to support veterans with PTSD. Client has over 650 pages of VA records supporting his severe impairment; this ALJ did not mention them in his decision.
No.... This Judge don't support Veterans with PTSD
No.... This Judge don't support Veterans with PTSD
No.... This Judge don't support Veterans with PTSD
No.... This Judge don't support Veterans with PTSD
I'm homeless now because of this judge and my doctor not nothing what the truth is about my disabilty. God will judge the both of you for what you have done to me.
I'm homeless now because of this judge and my doctor not nothing what the truth is about my disabilty. God will judge the both of you for what you have done to me.
I'm homeless now because of this judge and my doctor not nothing what the truth is about my disabilty. God will judge the both of you for what you have done to me.
God will judge the wicked judge by Jesus. Judge Mcarthur Allen needs to accept Jesus Christ into his life or else he will finally get what he deserves.
God will judge the wicked judge by Jesus. Judge Mcarthur Allen needs to accept Jesus Christ into his life or else he will finally get what he deserves.
God will judge the wicked judge by Jesus. Judge Mcarthur Allen needs to accept Jesus Christ into his life or else he will finally get what he deserves.
God will judge the wicked judge by Jesus. Judge Mcarthur Allen needs to accept Jesus Christ into his life or else he will finally get what he deserves.
Bad Judge!!
Bad Judge!!
Bad Judge!!
This Judge Allen is a liar and a cheat!! He is extremely dishonest. His appointment should be reconsidered.
This Judge Allen is a liar and a cheat!! He is extremely dishonest. His appointment should be reconsidered.
This Judge Allen is a liar and a cheat!! He is extremely dishonest. His appointment should be reconsidered.
I've found Judge Allen to be smart, fair and patient.
I've found Judge Allen to be smart, fair and patient.
I've found Judge Allen to be smart, fair and patient.
I've found Judge Allen to be smart, fair and patient.
I'm scared to go in front of him
I'm scared to go in front of him
I'm scared to go in front of him
I've worked for a law firm that has done Social Security law for 20+ years and who won't take a claim unless he feels the person is disabled. He's had a 95% record of favorable decisions until Fayetteville ODAR opened up. What a train wreck! I really feel for the claimant's who desperately deserve to be on disability and are denied. They then go to the Appeals Council where they sit for another 12 - 18 months while the claimant's lose everything they've worked for.
I've worked for a law firm that has done Social Security law for 20+ years and who won't take a claim unless he feels the person is disabled. He's had a 95% record of favorable decisions until Fayetteville ODAR opened up. What a train wreck! I really feel for the claimant's who desperately deserve to be on disability and are denied. They then go to the Appeals Council where they sit for another 12 - 18 months while the claimant's lose everything they've worked for.
I've worked for a law firm that has done Social Security law for 20+ years and who won't take a claim unless he feels the person is disabled. He's had a 95% record of favorable decisions until Fayetteville ODAR opened up. What a train wreck! I really feel for the claimant's who desperately deserve to be on disability and are denied. They then go to the Appeals Council where they sit for another 12 - 18 months while the claimant's lose everything they've worked for.
He is a joke for an ALJ!!!! I was denied on the grounds that the doctors that I was MADE to go to were not creditable!!?? Are you kidding me? They are licensed in our state and treating patients,performing surgeries,prescribing medications yet they are not creditable!!?? Wow!!
He is a joke for an ALJ!!!! I was denied on the grounds that the doctors that I was MADE to go to were not creditable!!?? Are you kidding me? They are licensed in our state and treating patients,performing surgeries,prescribing medications yet they are not creditable!!?? Wow!!
He is a joke for an ALJ!!!! I was denied on the grounds that the doctors that I was MADE to go to were not creditable!!?? Are you kidding me? They are licensed in our state and treating patients,performing surgeries,prescribing medications yet they are not creditable!!?? Wow!!
Hello everyone am very happy today I just received my loan from one God fearing woman Mrs Alberta when all my hope was lost that I can never get a loan anymore because I have been scammed by many lenders but I just encourage my self and take a bold step and apply with this lender but very happy to say today that I just received my loan of $150,000,00 US DOLLARS I will advice you all In need of a loan to just simply contact him on his email: and get your loan today have a nice day to you all.. Thanks, Barbara
Hello everyone am very happy today I just received my loan from one God fearing woman Mrs Alberta when all my hope was lost that I can never get a loan anymore because I have been scammed by many lenders but I just encourage my self and take a bold step and apply with this lender but very happy to say today that I just received my loan of $150,000,00 US DOLLARS I will advice you all In need of a loan to just simply contact him on his email: STANDARDFINANCE07 @ GMAIL . COM and get your loan today have a nice day to you all.. Thanks, Barbara
Hello every one, i am a happy man today because ERICKLOAN COMPANY who gave me an XMAS LOAN of $250,000.00 to settle some debts and start a new business and am asking everyone in need of loan to contact them via : rick_larsen729@yahoo.com
MY NAME IS ANITA FROM USA OHOI. I GOT A LOAN OF $130,000USD FROM Direct BOOST CAPITAL Services CONTACT THE LOAN COMPANY VIA EMAIL: {tombradinvestment@gmail.com} or call the company's phone number on + 14243055896
Appears to be confused or disorganized much of the time. Nice enough.
Appears to be confused or disorganized much of the time. Nice enough.
Appears to be confused or disorganized much of the time. Nice enough.
Appears to be confused or disorganized much of the time. Nice enough.
Has both an excellent grasp of the issues, and a heart for the claimant. Great ALJ. Do not BS him.
Has both an excellent grasp of the issues, and a heart for the claimant. Great ALJ. Do not BS him.
Has both an excellent grasp of the issues, and a heart for the claimant. Great ALJ. Do not BS him.
Has both an excellent grasp of the issues, and a heart for the claimant. Great ALJ. Do not BS him.
very understanding judge also good hearted
very understanding judge also good hearted
very understanding judge also good hearted
Excellent Judge! He has a great grasp of not only the law, but the pain the claimants go through. In my opinion, the best judge to handle your case. He doesn't just assume we're making this stuff up!
Judge Brian said in court that I would be rewarded my disability when I got them when I got the paperwork in the mail it is unfavorable so he is a lying a******
Very good judge.
No complaints..very compassionate human being. Whatever the decision he renders I am glad I had him.
He make the process so simply and understanding.i am happy that he was my Judge regardless of the outcome of order
Terrible decision; wasn't based upon the law nor the facts in the case. Even the VE testified no work was available due to amount of absences and time off required for my medical care; and he still ruled against me.
J s childs was a very nice judge regardless f the outcome of my situation. God bless Mr. Childs
Completely Incompetent Judge and System. Not only was my Birth Date incorrect, after fixing it and supplying Documentation...but the decision wasn't even based on what I applied for. The decision was based on information that was completely incorrect and I never once said was an issue. What a waste of time and effort. My dog could've done a better job.
Previously a claimant's attorney. Generally fair, but some of his denials are clearly contrived. He is keying on something in such cases that turns him off but I have yet to identify it.
Previously a claimant's attorney. Generally fair, but some of his denials are clearly contrived. He is keying on something in such cases that turns him off but I have yet to identify it.
Previously a claimant's attorney. Generally fair, but some of his denials are clearly contrived. He is keying on something in such cases that turns him off but I have yet to identify it.
Fair and transparent. Nothing "tricky" about him.
Fair and transparent. Nothing "tricky" about him.
Fair and transparent. Nothing "tricky" about him.
Fair and transparent. Nothing "tricky" about him.
judge todd colarusso is a very fair judge he know if you are really disable thank you for being the judge for atlanta
judge todd colarusso is a very fair judge he know if you are really disable thank you for being the judge for atlanta
judge todd colarusso is a very fair judge he know if you are really disable thank you for being the judge for atlanta
judge todd colarusso is a very fair judge he know if you are really disable thank you for being the judge for atlanta
Brilliant mind and gentle spirit! Excellent ALJ with integrity, drive and program knowledge.
Brilliant mind and gentle spirit! Excellent ALJ with integrity, drive and program knowledge.
Brilliant mind and gentle spirit! Excellent ALJ with integrity, drive and program knowledge.
This judge clearly MISSTATED the facts .lied . even when the voc tech said no jobs , why have a voc tech in there . I seen this judge within a year of filing ,then they wait 3 yrs to mail my appeal paperwork to WRONG address then he took what a ER doc said 2 years prior to filing to help him deny me . Bet he wouldn't take a ER doc saying how I cant work as a reason to approve .Ignored my 3 other docs saying I CANT work .. Thanks alot ! is this why some ppl lie and file in another state ?
he was very sympathetic and really looked at my case. favorable decision within 3 weeks.
He looked at my medical records & based his judgment on the opinions of the doctors I treat with, other than listening to the doctor the ssa paid. I received a fully favorable decision 6 weeks later.
He is a great judge very good listener and takes all the facts into consideration. Thank you your honor for hearing my case
ALJ Todd S Colarruso has not made a decision on my hearing ad of yet but i must say he is a very attentive judge and he pays close attention to you as you speak so that lets me know he listens to you and i just wanna say thank you for listening.
She is disengaged with a rather flat effect. She will basically have a representative handle all the questioning, and mainly solicit negative VE testimony. I doubt she bothers to read or familiarize herself with files before hearings, based on my observations. Her limited questioning to claimants certainly supports that view. Overall, she is one of the Atlanta ODAR's more unimpressive adjudicators.
She is disengaged with a rather flat effect. She will basically have a representative handle all the questioning, and mainly solicit negative VE testimony. I doubt she bothers to read or familiarize herself with files before hearings, based on my observations. Her limited questioning to claimants certainly supports that view. Overall, she is one of the Atlanta ODAR's more unimpressive adjudicators.
She is disengaged with a rather flat effect. She will basically have a representative handle all the questioning, and mainly solicit negative VE testimony. I doubt she bothers to read or familiarize herself with files before hearings, based on my observations. Her limited questioning to claimants certainly supports that view. Overall, she is one of the Atlanta ODAR's more unimpressive adjudicators.
She is disengaged with a rather flat effect. She will basically have a representative handle all the questioning, and mainly solicit negative VE testimony. I doubt she bothers to read or familiarize herself with files before hearings, based on my observations. Her limited questioning to claimants certainly supports that view. Overall, she is one of the Atlanta ODAR's more unimpressive adjudicators.
I Also think judge Karen Cornick does not look over files corectly. My partner was giving less then 14 months to live and have been awaiting her decision almost 5 months. It should have been a very open and closed case
I Also think judge Karen Cornick does not look over files corectly. My partner was giving less then 14 months to live and have been awaiting her decision almost 5 months. It should have been a very open and closed case
I Also think judge Karen Cornick does not look over files corectly. My partner was giving less then 14 months to live and have been awaiting her decision almost 5 months. It should have been a very open and closed case
.
.
.
I Really think its time she Retires. She is someone who should not be a judge, And if she is gonna stay a judge she really needs to look over cases more so then she does.
I Really think its time she Retires. She is someone who should not be a judge, And if she is gonna stay a judge she really needs to look over cases more so then she does.
I Really think its time she Retires. She is someone who should not be a judge, And if she is gonna stay a judge she really needs to look over cases more so then she does.
Grumpy. Disengaged. Definite bent toward denial. Will at times ignore compelling evidence in file without comment. Tricky hypotheticals.
Grumpy. Disengaged. Definite bent toward denial. Will at times ignore compelling evidence in file without comment. Tricky hypotheticals.
Grumpy. Disengaged. Definite bent toward denial. Will at times ignore compelling evidence in file without comment. Tricky hypotheticals.
Grumpy. Disengaged. Definite bent toward denial. Will at times ignore compelling evidence in file without comment. Tricky hypotheticals.
Absolutely terrible.
Absolutely terrible.
Absolutely terrible.
Absolutely terrible.
I totally agree with everyone about this judge. I received my unfavorable decision yesterday. There was a lot of untruths in my decision letter after it was determined that I have four different types of arthritis, depression, rototor cuff syndrome,and diabetes I was still denied. It was also determined that I could be a ticket giver even though I can barely use my hands.
I totally agree with everyone about this judge. I received my unfavorable decision yesterday. There was a lot of untruths in my decision letter after it was determined that I have four different types of arthritis, depression, rototor cuff syndrome,and diabetes I was still denied. It was also determined that I could be a ticket giver even though I can barely use my hands.
I totally agree with everyone about this judge. I received my unfavorable decision yesterday. There was a lot of untruths in my decision letter after it was determined that I have four different types of arthritis, depression, rototor cuff syndrome,and diabetes I was still denied. It was also determined that I could be a ticket giver even though I can barely use my hands.
I'm waiting on her to make a decision on my disability. Lord Jesus after reading all of these comment I just say Mercy Lord!!!!!!
May 09, 2016 She is freakin awful!!!!! I am so disgusted!!!!! HEARING DATE: February 10, 2016 May 09, 2016: Still no decision has been made. 1. She conducted my entire hearing without having acccess to review my treating physicians medical records or supporting documentation. 2. She waited until the end of the hearing to informed me that my medical records were not in my eletronic file. 3. Actually that was not true. My medical records were in the file, she just failed to search my file properly. 4. How could she have given me a fair hearing when she never reviewed any of my medical records or supporting documentation? 5. She just basically asked me gerneric questions but nothing pertaining to my disability claim. 6. No decision has been made yet, What should I do at this point?
Word is she is retiring.
She is a fair judge. Her hypotheticals will mirror hard evidence in the file, so get you file squared away prior to the hearing.
She is a fair judge. Her hypotheticals will mirror hard evidence in the file, so get you file squared away prior to the hearing.
She is a fair judge. Her hypotheticals will mirror hard evidence in the file, so get you file squared away prior to the hearing.
Fair, but not a pushover. Evidence must be in file. Often does not use VEs, and when she does, she seems to have difficulty constructing hypotheticals. Uses non-standard adjectives in hypotheticals.
Fair, but not a pushover. Evidence must be in file. Often does not use VEs, and when she does, she seems to have difficulty constructing hypotheticals. Uses non-standard adjectives in hypotheticals.
Fair, but not a pushover. Evidence must be in file. Often does not use VEs, and when she does, she seems to have difficulty constructing hypotheticals. Uses non-standard adjectives in hypotheticals.
Fair, but not a pushover. Evidence must be in file. Often does not use VEs, and when she does, she seems to have difficulty constructing hypotheticals. Uses non-standard adjectives in hypotheticals.
It was very nice seeing an confidently smart African American Judge. I use to want to be a lawyer before i got sick. I have been working since i was 14, and hate that I became ill. With no help or family it is hard taking care of 5 children disable. I love my children so I will continue to fight the good fight of faith. I have lost everything my home, car, credit, ambition, & husband. I just pray that approved or denied. God will use me to continue to spread faith hope & love, I do believe I am pregnant with divine purpose so I will wait to see what the end will be.
It was very nice seeing an confidently smart African American Judge. I use to want to be a lawyer before i got sick. I have been working since i was 14, and hate that I became ill. With no help or family it is hard taking care of 5 children disable. I love my children so I will continue to fight the good fight of faith. I have lost everything my home, car, credit, ambition, & husband. I just pray that approved or denied. God will use me to continue to spread faith hope & love, I do believe I am pregnant with divine purpose so I will wait to see what the end will be.
It was very nice seeing an confidently smart African American Judge. I use to want to be a lawyer before i got sick. I have been working since i was 14, and hate that I became ill. With no help or family it is hard taking care of 5 children disable. I love my children so I will continue to fight the good fight of faith. I have lost everything my home, car, credit, ambition, & husband. I just pray that approved or denied. God will use me to continue to spread faith hope & love, I do believe I am pregnant with divine purpose so I will wait to see what the end will be.
Well i had my hearing today with Ms. Lisa Dabreu and i was alittle nervous at first but i was confident that i was gonna recieve a positive out put in my case. And it went very well with Ms. Lisa as well as with my attorney Mr. Michael Moore with the Cochran Firm so now im just waiting on a respond from Ms. Lisa about her decision on me being disabled to work so i am gonna be prayin GOD and leave it in His hands as well as Ms. Lisa hands to approve me fot SSI because i cant work God knows i tried to work but it didnt work because of my chronic joint pain and cramping in my fingers always drawing up and it hurt so bad that it makes me cry and the joint pain to hurt so bad espically when its cold outside my whole body get to hurting i have to take my strong pain medicine which makes me very sleepy so at night i be moaning and groaning because u be in pain,my youngest son say to me mom go to the ER and i say i will see how i feel after i take this percocet. So im awaiting on the decision and praying that t wont take 30-90 days before i hear something from Judge Lisa Dabreu she seems very concern about people health and it has nothing to do with her being a african american judge shes about her job so GOD you know my needs and not my wants according to my severe pain level.
Well i had my hearing today with Ms. Lisa Dabreu and i was alittle nervous at first but i was confident that i was gonna recieve a positive out put in my case. And it went very well with Ms. Lisa as well as with my attorney Mr. Michael Moore with the Cochran Firm so now im just waiting on a respond from Ms. Lisa about her decision on me being disabled to work so i am gonna be prayin GOD and leave it in His hands as well as Ms. Lisa hands to approve me fot SSI because i cant work God knows i tried to work but it didnt work because of my chronic joint pain and cramping in my fingers always drawing up and it hurt so bad that it makes me cry and the joint pain to hurt so bad espically when its cold outside my whole body get to hurting i have to take my strong pain medicine which makes me very sleepy so at night i be moaning and groaning because u be in pain,my youngest son say to me mom go to the ER and i say i will see how i feel after i take this percocet. So im awaiting on the decision and praying that t wont take 30-90 days before i hear something from Judge Lisa Dabreu she seems very concern about people health and it has nothing to do with her being a african american judge shes about her job so GOD you know my needs and not my wants according to my severe pain level.
Well i had my hearing today with Ms. Lisa Dabreu and i was alittle nervous at first but i was confident that i was gonna recieve a positive out put in my case. And it went very well with Ms. Lisa as well as with my attorney Mr. Michael Moore with the Cochran Firm so now im just waiting on a respond from Ms. Lisa about her decision on me being disabled to work so i am gonna be prayin GOD and leave it in His hands as well as Ms. Lisa hands to approve me fot SSI because i cant work God knows i tried to work but it didnt work because of my chronic joint pain and cramping in my fingers always drawing up and it hurt so bad that it makes me cry and the joint pain to hurt so bad espically when its cold outside my whole body get to hurting i have to take my strong pain medicine which makes me very sleepy so at night i be moaning and groaning because u be in pain,my youngest son say to me mom go to the ER and i say i will see how i feel after i take this percocet. So im awaiting on the decision and praying that t wont take 30-90 days before i hear something from Judge Lisa Dabreu she seems very concern about people health and it has nothing to do with her being a african american judge shes about her job so GOD you know my needs and not my wants according to my severe pain level.
God will judge you for lying
God will judge you for lying
God will judge you for lying
God will judge you for lying
I want to say that this man..Judge Brian Dougherty is the best. I had a Hearing on December 12,2012 after being denied twice and waiting for almost 3 years... I didn't know what to expect in the Hearing and my Attorney and I met for the first time about 30 min. before. He assured me that it would be fine. The hearing itself was very easy and Judge Dougherty was so nice to me. He actually disregarded all of the State Dr.'s that I had seen and said I could work, and went with my PCP's letter and records. He told me right then that I was approved and all I had to do was wait for the letter in the mail... they said it could be as long as 3 months but in 2 1/2 weeks I got it and on Jan. 1, 2013 my benefits started. Thank you so much Judge Daugherty... Rhonda Mohar
I want to say that this man..Judge Brian Dougherty is the best. I had a Hearing on December 12,2012 after being denied twice and waiting for almost 3 years... I didn't know what to expect in the Hearing and my Attorney and I met for the first time about 30 min. before. He assured me that it would be fine. The hearing itself was very easy and Judge Dougherty was so nice to me. He actually disregarded all of the State Dr.'s that I had seen and said I could work, and went with my PCP's letter and records. He told me right then that I was approved and all I had to do was wait for the letter in the mail... they said it could be as long as 3 months but in 2 1/2 weeks I got it and on Jan. 1, 2013 my benefits started. Thank you so much Judge Daugherty... Rhonda Mohar
I want to say that this man..Judge Brian Dougherty is the best. I had a Hearing on December 12,2012 after being denied twice and waiting for almost 3 years... I didn't know what to expect in the Hearing and my Attorney and I met for the first time about 30 min. before. He assured me that it would be fine. The hearing itself was very easy and Judge Dougherty was so nice to me. He actually disregarded all of the State Dr.'s that I had seen and said I could work, and went with my PCP's letter and records. He told me right then that I was approved and all I had to do was wait for the letter in the mail... they said it could be as long as 3 months but in 2 1/2 weeks I got it and on Jan. 1, 2013 my benefits started. Thank you so much Judge Daugherty... Rhonda Mohar
Seems overly impressed with herself. Evidence must be there, and you must point it out.
Seems overly impressed with herself. Evidence must be there, and you must point it out.
Seems overly impressed with herself. Evidence must be there, and you must point it out.
Seems overly impressed with herself. Evidence must be there, and you must point it out.
I am still waiting on my decision, but I wanted to say that I thought she was very polite and professional. She is a Judge overseeing a case, so yes there must be evidence proven as with any case.
I am still waiting on my decision, but I wanted to say that I thought she was very polite and professional. She is a Judge overseeing a case, so yes there must be evidence proven as with any case.
I am still waiting on my decision, but I wanted to say that I thought she was very polite and professional. She is a Judge overseeing a case, so yes there must be evidence proven as with any case.
I am still waiting on my decision, but I wanted to say that I thought she was very polite and professional. She is a Judge overseeing a case, so yes there must be evidence proven as with any case.
Still waiting on a decision,with a letter from my doctor stating that I can not work pages of medical problems over three months no decision. I have been out work three years and can't get any help. I know undeserving people who got it in a few months really what am I supposed to do
She doesn't have heart..... You suppose to help people to get what they need you have denied my my mother 5 years ago an she has been waiting 8 years now it seem like judges want people to die cause yall really don't know what a person go threw or has been . A few word on a paper doesn't means anything think about that . I give you my blessing even doe you denied hers
Judge Melinda Dula, definitely doesn't have a heart!!! She denied my moms case. My mom has suffered from epilepsy for the past 20+ years and has basically took over her mind. It's like living with a parent that suffers from Alzheimer's where they remember some things but can't remember other things. It breaks my heart to know that she is continuously depressed because she hates that she can't work to take care of herself and has to depend on others to take care of her finincally. Not even that but if she didn't have family that stepped up to the plate she would be homeless because she doesn't have any source of income. What these judges forget is that work for the people but they don't have people in mind. One day they will be faced with the same problems that these people face and that's when they will fully understand the magnitude of what these people go through on a daily bases. What these judges also fail to realize is that God always has the final so and he always wins! God has my mom and always has, we will continue to keep the faith!
I think she is far and knows the chips are stacked against people whom put in and are now shut out of the fruits of life. Homelessness is the case of hatred and racism especially in the south. We sleep under bridges and wash up in public bathrooms to survive. Voluntarily go to jail in the winter and very humid summer months for food, a bearable environment out of the unbearable elements. Reparations are do to American Descendants of Slaves...#Ase
My hearing was in June 2019 was told in courtroom in 30 days I would receive my decision letter, here it is damn near September 2019 I haven't heard or seen shit... I'm bout call the newspaper and news crew and go back down there and raise hell with a whistleblower...
Had my hearing in August it's now December smh🤦🏾♂️ she didn't seem mean she ask for me and my Lawyer to have more paperwork in 30 days I had to her the same day so I hope and pray she see I'm bout my business. And that I need this I'm homeless in the middle of a pandemic. I pray she help me so I can help my self and my family....
Had my hearing in August it's now December smh🤦🏾♂️ she didn't seem mean she ask for me and my Lawyer to have more paperwork in 30 days I had to her the same day so I hope and pray she see I'm bout my business. And that I need this I'm homeless in the middle of a pandemic. I pray she help me so I can help my self and my family....
She is coming to Tucson.
Judge yasmin Elias was the judge at my hearing she was very nice and very professional a give here 5 stars
Judge Elias used many partial statements so it would appear to mean the opposite of what the actual full event was so it could be used against me. If the entire statement was used in context, it would have been in my favor. She did this several times throughout the decision process. She said I had therapy that I did not. Medical records verify that. Even omitted statements from the vocational expert that were in my favor. Obviously my case was denied because of her false statements and half assed statements. Why have a vocational expert if you're going to ignore him. He said there was no jobs for me given my conditions when my lawyer asked. She must of had a hearing problem during that moment.
Just received my unfavorable decision from Judge Elias. Her decision process was erratic and biased without any consideration for the actual medical diagnosis. She used the opinions of doctors who have no actual medical experiance in the field of medicine needed to make a proper diagnosis. She used 2 medical opinions from two M.D.s who never actualy met me or knew any thing about me other than my name. She stated in her opinion that the medical evidence provided by 2 specialist in the field of medicine specifically related to my disease were " we will not defer or give any specific evidentiary weight to any prior adminstrative medical findings or medical opinions from your medical sources." She then claims that the 2 doctors with zero expertise, one an opthamologis or an eye docter and two, a G.P who was reprimanded by the Arizona medical board for Failing to recognise a Tachycardia event in a patient. Or laymens term a heart attack. So the expert medical opinions of 2 doctors with Zero eperience in making medical decisions on disease or disabilities they have no experiance in, out weighs the medical experiance of doctors who have dedicate there lives to specializing in.. These specialists i had to see to get the medical tests from, were requested by ssa to substantiate my medical condition in order to file my claim for disability. Her decision to ignore actual evidence and make an opinion using failed logic is disturbing. If a judge used this same logic path in a criminal trial the legal system would protect the accused. But it seems in a hearing for disability there is no form of protection or law that states all evidence provided must be used and that any expert testimony must come from an actual doctor who specializes in the field of medicine required to make an actual diagnosis. As it is today ill be requesting an appeal through my attourney as well as contacting my state representative to investigate Judge Elias and her opinions over the last few years to determine weather there is any bias or discriminatory practices . I followed the leter of the law in starting the disability claim, i followed the requested visitations and appointments with the specialists required by the SSA to show medical evidence of my disability , and when the medical evidence showed the diagnosis for the disease stated in the claim for disability She chose it ignore it and discard it an myself without any thought to my situation.
She ignored all of the medical experts and formed an opinion based on her own personal opinions, a travesty.
She ignored all of the medical experts and formed an opinion based on her own personal opinions, a travesty.
Asks many questions himself, most geared toward getting to the crux of the case theory. Transparent. Not tricky. Does not like substance use.
Asks many questions himself, most geared toward getting to the crux of the case theory. Transparent. Not tricky. Does not like substance use.
Asks many questions himself, most geared toward getting to the crux of the case theory. Transparent. Not tricky. Does not like substance use.
Asks many questions himself, most geared toward getting to the crux of the case theory. Transparent. Not tricky. Does not like substance use.
Very honest,fair,compassionate man all around compitent judge
this is a very fair judge, doesn't try to make you fill guilty for being disabled. He is very much straight forward in getting to the facts of your case.
This is for Judge Glenn Embree. I am desperate.I went before him on Feb19 2016. My representation(lawyer) hasn't been able to resolve my case. IRS claims I didn't file 2013 taxes , but I did. I've submitted all documents , and still no resolution. Please help me .I've contacted every office , but no one can help me. My # is 404-246-1147 My name is Dina Cowger. I'm begging please help me.
This judge got good reviews.
Just wanted to take a minute and say thank you to Judge Glenn Embree! This is a judge who cares about the disabled. He approved my case that I have been fighting for 2 and a half years. I have been through 3 back surgeries and I am in severe need of more along with a total shoulder replacement. Glad to have had a judge who understands my situation and understands this is my last opportunity to support my family! Judge Embree listens fully to understand your case! Anyone that is truly disabled is very fortunate to stand before Judge Glenn Embree at a hearing!!
thank you disability pro you are 100 percent rite with what you have said we are in the market for a new laywer to represent us on our apeal if interested write eback and i will foward my info
thank you disability pro you are 100 percent rite with what you have said we are in the market for a new laywer to represent us on our apeal if interested write eback and i will foward my info
thank you disability pro you are 100 percent rite with what you have said we are in the market for a new laywer to represent us on our apeal if interested write eback and i will foward my info
thank you disability pro you are 100 percent rite with what you have said we are in the market for a new laywer to represent us on our apeal if interested write eback and i will foward my info
His approval rating hs gone consistently down over the last couple of years. I think his decisions are poorly written. He comes across as an arrogant jerk.
His approval rating hs gone consistently down over the last couple of years. I think his decisions are poorly written. He comes across as an arrogant jerk.
His approval rating hs gone consistently down over the last couple of years. I think his decisions are poorly written. He comes across as an arrogant jerk.
His approval rating hs gone consistently down over the last couple of years. I think his decisions are poorly written. He comes across as an arrogant jerk.
This guy seems to think that all DDS decisions are correct. They why have ALJs? If this is acceptable performance, then let's go straight from DDS to civil court. Hope you lose your job, ALJ (i.e. not a real judge) Flanagan.
This guy seems to think that all DDS decisions are correct. They why have ALJs? If this is acceptable performance, then let's go straight from DDS to civil court. Hope you lose your job, ALJ (i.e. not a real judge) Flanagan.
This guy seems to think that all DDS decisions are correct. They why have ALJs? If this is acceptable performance, then let's go straight from DDS to civil court. Hope you lose your job, ALJ (i.e. not a real judge) Flanagan.
Interesting guy. Uber conservative. He asks the same question many times, then if any of the answers are not identical, concludes that the testimony is inconsistent. Plays "gotcha" with the evidence. Starts from an "unfavorable" vantage, and is rarely moved from it. Looks like he really enjoys the torment of the hearings process. Lulls the rep into a sense of complacency by posing favorable hypotheticals that he has absolutely no intention of ever considering. In his eyes, everyone is a faking cheat. As a taxpayer, I love him. Otherwise, not so much.
Interesting guy. Uber conservative. He asks the same question many times, then if any of the answers are not identical, concludes that the testimony is inconsistent. Plays "gotcha" with the evidence. Starts from an "unfavorable" vantage, and is rarely moved from it. Looks like he really enjoys the torment of the hearings process. Lulls the rep into a sense of complacency by posing favorable hypotheticals that he has absolutely no intention of ever considering. In his eyes, everyone is a faking cheat. As a taxpayer, I love him. Otherwise, not so much.
Interesting guy. Uber conservative. He asks the same question many times, then if any of the answers are not identical, concludes that the testimony is inconsistent. Plays "gotcha" with the evidence. Starts from an "unfavorable" vantage, and is rarely moved from it. Looks like he really enjoys the torment of the hearings process. Lulls the rep into a sense of complacency by posing favorable hypotheticals that he has absolutely no intention of ever considering. In his eyes, everyone is a faking cheat. As a taxpayer, I love him. Otherwise, not so much.
I wouldn't love him as a taxpayer either. He wastes money. Why don't we just save money by not having a hearing since he routinely goes with the agency opinion no matter what. Not to mention the waste of money from appealing it to the AC and then having it remanded only to go in front of this fool again.
I wouldn't love him as a taxpayer either. He wastes money. Why don't we just save money by not having a hearing since he routinely goes with the agency opinion no matter what. Not to mention the waste of money from appealing it to the AC and then having it remanded only to go in front of this fool again.
I wouldn't love him as a taxpayer either. He wastes money. Why don't we just save money by not having a hearing since he routinely goes with the agency opinion no matter what. Not to mention the waste of money from appealing it to the AC and then having it remanded only to go in front of this fool again.
SSA should remove this person from the bench before more deserving American citizens die because he illegally and improperly denied their claim. He does not understand the law or how to apply it. If you case is assigned to this judge, you should demand that your case be assigned to a different judge before your hearing is held.
SSA should remove this person from the bench before more deserving American citizens die because he illegally and improperly denied their claim. He does not understand the law or how to apply it. If you case is assigned to this judge, you should demand that your case be assigned to a different judge before your hearing is held.
SSA should remove this person from the bench before more deserving American citizens die because he illegally and improperly denied their claim. He does not understand the law or how to apply it. If you case is assigned to this judge, you should demand that your case be assigned to a different judge before your hearing is held.
Should be removed from the bench. He has an agenda. Denies approximately 90 percent of claims. I have had clients die shortly after he denied their claim. He has no business being a judge. A disgrace.
Judge Flanagan flat out lied to me. Then did not even have the decency to send me notice that he dismissed my appeal. I was told to wait until a decision was reached and finally called only to find out he had dismissed my case two months prior. Talk about ineptitude.
I was in the 207 denied. He judged my personal life instead of medical thats wrong. I wake up all time thinking what i should have told him. My attorney suxs.when we first walked in the judgement room my atty daid judge i have another case in 45 mins judge said it wont take to long i was scared to day anything my atty advised me to say as little as possible. Now if i could work no one hire me im a liability. Ins cost to much. Im screwed thank judge for everything u didnt do. Now how am i going to support my family. I havent able to by christmas gifts for 2 years
I found Judge Flanagan to be very thorough, and his line of questioning was thoughtful and precise. He is clearly dedicated to only awarding SSDI benefits to those who are truly unable to work, which I personally find commendable. Yes, he does ask some questions several times after re-wording them, but as long as the applicant is being honest, the answers should always be the same, regardless of how the question is framed. Sadly, there are MANY people who apply for SSDI who are not truly disabled; Judge Flanagan makes every effort to ferret such people out and deny them benefits. While it is unfortunate that the general mindset toward SSDI applicants is that they are able-bodied until they prove themselves to be disabled beyond a shadow of a doubt, applicants can thank the MANY people who try to scam the system and obtain benefits when they are not truly disabled for this. In other words, Judge Flanagan is not "the bad guy" in this scenario. To the contrary, it is the lying deadbeats who stand before him and his colleagues claiming to be disabled when they are not who have made the journey to receiving SSDI benefits as tedious and demeaning as it is. I am giving Judge Flanagan four stars instead of five because I did not agree with his decision to award my counsel full legal fees. As he was aware, she made a number of serious mistakes/oversights in presenting my case, and was extremely unprofessional. When Judge Flanagan contacted me and asked for my input, I provided what I felt was a solid argument as to why my attorney did not deserve to be awarded full compensation. While I was disappointed with his decision to award her the full $6,000, I was otherwise quite pleased with his handling of my case. I realize there will be many people who disagree with my opinion - but it is just that: MY opinion, based on MY personal experience with Judge Flanagan. Clearly, people rush to post negative remarks about Judge Flanagan when they are not awarded benefits. My hope is that my positive experience with Judge Flanagan will balance things out a bit. If your SSDI hearing has been assigned to Judge Flanagan's calendar, I believe you will get a fair hearing. If you are truly disabled and provide a scrupulously honest testimony, you will likely receive a favorable ruling. Is it possible that Judge Flanagan sometimes makes a mistake and denies benefits to someone who is truly disabled? Of course - he is human. Judge Flanagan has a responsibility to all taxpayers to be as thorough as possible when hearing cases and rendering decisions, and I believe it is to his credit that he takes that responsibility very seriously.
I am appealing this man's decision. Not only did he fail to consider all medical records he makes false statements regarding testimony given. Hope the appeals council reviews my trial transcripts.
To classify this guy as a Judge is an injustice to American society. His personal opinions out weighing medical facts, treatments and documentation ( by PHYSICIANS) which he is not, is an absolute disgrace. To simply put it, he is a waste of taxpayers money, whom I myself have paid . ALL of this idiots cases should be IMMEDIATELY reviewed by The Appeals Board and him REMOVED not only from the ALJ position, but disbarment from law practice FOREVER! If you're going to be arrogant and condescending, at least be Smart and fair!
This Judge does not go on the facts presented before him...He had already made a decision is his mind to deny me my benefits without even hearing the whole case out...Because I had went to college @GSU for one semester...Does he not know that people with mental disabilites can go to college with a lot of assistance...Do not want to go in front of him again...because he will deny me again...I pray for this man...in my opinion, i feel that he was bias in my situation.
Did not read anything in my file but good things, I am so sorry I have had a good day once and a while. You are worthless and do not deserve to be a judge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How social security continues to allow judges like this to operate is beyond me. They need to remove judges like this that clearly have an anti-clamant agenda. They also need to investigate the Las Vegas office as their approval rating is ridiculously low as well. To think that someone who is waiting 3 years and hasn't worked the entire time is somehow not disabled is beyond me.
I have been waiting on my decision and I waited 3 years to get a court date and wondered if anyone knew how long he takes to issue a decision. I am broke and tired of waiting!
The problem here with this judge may be because he believes patients have the ability to work when they do not. To show up to work daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly, and work full time is difficult for many people who could appear only minorly disabled. Judges are not medical people. This is the single biggest flaw in the system. Judges do not have training, experience, knowledge in medical illnesses causing disabilities. To expect a judge to know when a persons disability will significantly interfere with work is ignorant. You must be able to understand the medical implications of the disability in the work placed and you cannot do this if you do not understand the illness and if you do not treat these patients over time and have experience in how patients are actually impacted with varying degrees of severity of the disorders and how different jobs are impacted over time. You really must be a physician to know the answers. Physicians can be biased but so can attorneys trying to get approvals and make money. Attorneys are not always ethical because they receive money based on the outcome of cases where physicians get paid for the treatment. This judge, if stats are correct, lacks wisdom and believes people can do more than they can without crumbling. And the high rate of denials are extreme and he is arrogant and wrong and people die from his arrogance. It is only with a few cases where the healthy and not disabled win disability. His extreme rates of denial are off the mark. He is not the only smart attorney. Most judges do a very good job.
This Judge has a job to do, you can bet he's going to do it. If he don't ask you questions, how's he suppose to render a just decision on your case. Was approved and didn't go in his courtroom to lie or play games.
so case was disapproved, every element was not allowed. wow the thought of some of the comments made and to think the defendant didn't even know how to say that the information that they were being asked was wrong or not something that they understood or knew about. WoW and what was the attorney doing but trying to help, and being told to stop. These aren't criminal cases they are disability cases. Judge them and sentence them to a life of no assistance, thats what you've done and contrary to the judges belief it's not his money that these people are receiving most have worked and or had parents or spouses that have worked and are eligible under them to assistance.
Mr. Brendan Flanagan is known and has proven to lie on federal documents. When presented with a testimony from a vocational expert he doesn't agree with, he has been known to remove said testimony and replace it with a fabrication of his own under a different name. In addition he alters information presented by medical professionals, takes medical statements that pre-date an injury or illness to "prove" the applicant recovered, and invents information of his own.
In my opinion this was the worst judge ever, I was told I was gonna die a few weeks after he decided I was not fit for Disabillity, With two pick lines in my arm I have been a unable to work for years. I have been in and out of hospitals and ICU often on with no ability to work at all. Not only that he would seriously roll his eyes as you’re telling him what’s going on to make you to where you cannot work. Unbelievable absolutely unbelievable
In my opinion this was the worst judge ever, I was told I was gonna die a few weeks after he decided I was not fit for Disabillity, With two pick lines in my arm I have been a unable to work for years. I have been in and out of hospitals and ICU often on with no ability to work at all. Not only that he would seriously roll his eyes
To her credit, she demands superior preparation on the part of advocates, and will ultimately award a case if it's been expertly argued. Be ready to cite exhibits in support of a case theory, and be ready to defend any positions asserted. Be mindful that she tightly controls when and how representatives may rebut her on-the-record characterizations of what the evidence depicts. As a result of the friendly back and forth repartee that she enjoys, her hearings can run longer than average. While she can be difficult at times, I respect her reverence for process and her willingness to give a representative all the time he or she needs to make the best case.
To her credit, she demands superior preparation on the part of advocates, and will ultimately award a case if it's been expertly argued. Be ready to cite exhibits in support of a case theory, and be ready to defend any positions asserted. Be mindful that she tightly controls when and how representatives may rebut her on-the-record characterizations of what the evidence depicts. As a result of the friendly back and forth repartee that she enjoys, her hearings can run longer than average. While she can be difficult at times, I respect her reverence for process and her willingness to give a representative all the time he or she needs to make the best case.
To her credit, she demands superior preparation on the part of advocates, and will ultimately award a case if it's been expertly argued. Be ready to cite exhibits in support of a case theory, and be ready to defend any positions asserted. Be mindful that she tightly controls when and how representatives may rebut her on-the-record characterizations of what the evidence depicts. As a result of the friendly back and forth repartee that she enjoys, her hearings can run longer than average. While she can be difficult at times, I respect her reverence for process and her willingness to give a representative all the time he or she needs to make the best case.
To her credit, she demands superior preparation on the part of advocates, and will ultimately award a case if it's been expertly argued. Be ready to cite exhibits in support of a case theory, and be ready to defend any positions asserted. Be mindful that she tightly controls when and how representatives may rebut her on-the-record characterizations of what the evidence depicts. As a result of the friendly back and forth repartee that she enjoys, her hearings can run longer than average. While she can be difficult at times, I respect her reverence for process and her willingness to give a representative all the time he or she needs to make the best case.
She seemed to start in Atlanta as an uber-tough judge, but seems to have mellowed as of late. Fair but tough. Tends to ask a lot of clarifying questions during testimony.
She seemed to start in Atlanta as an uber-tough judge, but seems to have mellowed as of late. Fair but tough. Tends to ask a lot of clarifying questions during testimony.
She seemed to start in Atlanta as an uber-tough judge, but seems to have mellowed as of late. Fair but tough. Tends to ask a lot of clarifying questions during testimony.
She seemed to start in Atlanta as an uber-tough judge, but seems to have mellowed as of late. Fair but tough. Tends to ask a lot of clarifying questions during testimony.
I like her she seems fair and nice
I like her she seems fair and nice
I like her she seems fair and nice
She starts out as a denial, then basically challenges you to change her mind. There is nothing of merit about her.
She starts out as a denial, then basically challenges you to change her mind. There is nothing of merit about her.
She starts out as a denial, then basically challenges you to change her mind. There is nothing of merit about her.
This ALJ seemed to me as straightforward and fair. My lawyer bailed on me two days before hearing, and I decided to represent myself. She explained proceedings, and seemed to try to put me at ease. She struck me as impartial to past denial, and more than willing to weigh all evidence on both sides to make a fair and just judgment.I think to many people are looking at her approval/denial ratings, and jumping to conclusions.If you have the evidence, which you need in any case no matter who the ALJ is, she will render a just and fair decision.
This ALJ seemed to me as straightforward and fair. My lawyer bailed on me two days before hearing, and I decided to represent myself. She explained proceedings, and seemed to try to put me at ease. She struck me as impartial to past denial, and more than willing to weigh all evidence on both sides to make a fair and just judgment.I think to many people are looking at her approval/denial ratings, and jumping to conclusions.If you have the evidence, which you need in any case no matter who the ALJ is, she will render a just and fair decision.
This ALJ seemed to me as straightforward and fair. My lawyer bailed on me two days before hearing, and I decided to represent myself. She explained proceedings, and seemed to try to put me at ease. She struck me as impartial to past denial, and more than willing to weigh all evidence on both sides to make a fair and just judgment.I think to many people are looking at her approval/denial ratings, and jumping to conclusions.If you have the evidence, which you need in any case no matter who the ALJ is, she will render a just and fair decision.
This ALJ seemed to me as straightforward and fair. My lawyer bailed on me two days before hearing, and I decided to represent myself. She explained proceedings, and seemed to try to put me at ease. She struck me as impartial to past denial, and more than willing to weigh all evidence on both sides to make a fair and just judgment.I think to many people are looking at her approval/denial ratings, and jumping to conclusions.If you have the evidence, which you need in any case no matter who the ALJ is, she will render a just and fair decision.
ALJ Flowers very professional and straight forward.
ALJ Flowers very professional and straight forward.
ALJ Flowers very professional and straight forward.
I went to court for the second time ! My appeal got her decision revoked and lucky me had another court date! She couldn't make a decision because records that were faxed to her got lost!!! LOL ! So the info has been there because I collected and turned in the information! I was told by the professional person that says if u can work! He agreed I can't work! After 6 years you think degenerative disc disease would be approved ! No i have lost everything and now losing hope period ! I'm stuck in a room waiting and will not keep waiting I'm done! My life is ruined! Thanks for all the help!
I thought she did not have a lot of knowledge on what social security finds to be disabled. when she was not sure of a case she leans toward denial.
I am curious because a attorney advised me that NIKKI FLOWERS is no longer a judge! I know she has really changed my entire life. I don't think that she is capable of doing her job . I know that she doesn't read information that is turned in regarding my case . Each decision made wasn't based on me , and in the hearing they have a person who decides what work you can do. He said less than minimal! My decision said I can lift 50 lbs and do this for a full time job! I believe that she has ruined many people's lives and not even blinked a eye ! She should not have a job because she doesn't do her job! Rude, states request information but never does! I pray she is gone! Every case that she has made ruling should be reviewed so WE THE PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY RECEIVE WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY EARNED!!!
This Judge is 100% unfair. She does not make decisions based on the medical evidence in the file. She always try to make professional comments that she is not qualified to make. She has denied me twice and each time I appealed it and the case was sent back to her for a new decision. This time the appeals board ordered that a NEW Judge get my case and follow the law and make a new decision. I pray that the correct decision is made this time.
Judge Flowers was well aware of the issues in my case and had thoroughly reviewed my file. Her decision was based on the facts in my case and on the law. She told me before I left to expect a decision within a week or so; took a little longer but I know the delay was not her fault. Thanks Judge Flowers!!
Judge Flowers had thoroughly reviewed my file and asked a few questions for clarification. The hearing was conducted in a forthright, fair and respectful manner.
I hope she make a great decision dis time i cried last time cause of my ms it have me emotional bad and told her da truth. About my life she denies me now im nac at it again i can't take another one fa my son sake mighty as well died
Most disgusting unprofessional denial letter. Degrading a person with untruths. Could have just stated her opinion of not qualifying under what code section. Will be sending a copy and a detailed letter to Andrew Saui.
Most disgusting unprofessional denial letter. Degrading a person with untruths. Could have just stated her opinion of not qualifying under what code section. Will be sending a copy and a detailed letter to Andrew Saui.
Most disgusting unprofessional denial letter. Degrading a person with untruths. Could have just stated her opinion of not qualifying under what code section. Will be sending a copy and a detailed letter to Andrew Saui.
Most disgusting unprofessional denial letter. Degrading a person with untruths. Could have just stated her opinion of not qualifying under what code section. Will be sending a copy and a detailed letter to Andrew Saui.
I will be filing an unfair treatment complaint. She is unprofessional and believes a person is capable to work when doctors and even occupational therapist states person would be limited to maybe a two hours a day. Who hires for two hours a day. Did she go to college or is she basing this on her working two hours a day.
Going through the channels. If you feel that you have been mistreated, humiliated, lied about, degraded ECT. Contact your congressperson, head of the social security administration, the presidents staff, or the unfair treatment dept. I have done this and forms are being sent via mail. Feel the forms out and enclose a copy of the denial letter. Denial is Floowers call but a disgusting lie based denial letter that she should have read over is also her call. If this applies to you take the steps to have her exposed as a hateful person not fit for the position she holds.
Going through the channels. If you feel that you have been mistreated, humiliated, lied about, degraded ECT. Contact your congressperson, head of the social security administration, the presidents staff, or the unfair treatment dept. I have done this and forms are being sent via mail. Feel the forms out and enclose a copy of the denial letter. Denial is Floowers call but a disgusting lie based denial letter that she should have read over is also her call. If this applies to you take the steps to have her exposed as a hateful person not fit for the position she holds.
If you feel like you were unfairly treated and/or degraded by this judge contact Patrick Nagle. He is the head administrative law judge. His office will look into your allegations. Don't be a victim of an uncaring person like Nikki Flowers and her employees. Her treatment of people with debilitating injuries and mental depression will make a persons situation even worse. Good luck to each of you and stay strong. She can degrade you but God knows your struggles and knows who is deserving and who is not. God bless
If alj where equivalent to a Dr this lady is a qauke. She doesn't know or understand laws. She is more of an opinion based alj. She knows a person is legally disabled but like disabilities Dr, psychiatrist, occupational therapist they want to deny to keep their high paying jobs. Your lawyer isn't going to fight hard when you are denied either because they know they have to go before her again. They deal with hundreds of client so if some that are legitimately disabled and denied they won't fight because they are receiving $6000 for the others. It a money racket at the expense of those suffering. You can't live on the money if you're approved but it is at least somth ing for the person that can't work. If a person could work you think they wouldn't work just to receive this little amount.
The denial letter I agree is distasteful to say the least. It was also full of untruths. I'm the father of the person applying for disability and they said I made statements. I've never have spoken to anyone about her situation. Now needless to say her depression has gotten a lot worse to where I barely sleep in fear of her hurting herself. Always checking on her all hours of day and night. A simple respectfully written denial letter would not have made a dire situation even worse. Please show some compassion. You can deny someone in a decent way.
Idiots so called judge and vocational expert my butt. I hope they can sleep at night keeping their good paying jobs by denying people who are really disabled. They have special place for people who profit at the expense and misey of others. It is called HELL!! Neither were professional they had to meet their denial quotas to keep there jobs. Wake up people and realize they can't approve the people who are truly disabled and keep their jobs so they choose to turn their backs on all of us who are truly not able to work. Pure evil. Those of you praising her could have been in the other category of being denied. Then I bet you would have a different prospective. They have to keep the percentages low and how do they do this by denying some of the truly disabled. It is disgusting. But they have to live with this evil. God bless each of you and if you are disabled keep fighting this corruption.
Her and the occupational person are completely incompetent or just want to keep a high denial rating for job security. My case is 100 percent in line with disability laws. The hearing was over the phone and when the occupational person said when the others are off the line he wanted to speak to her. Letter comes in and his recommendation is I can work in the same field that sent me to the hospital after four hour shift. But that I would need extra breaks. I don't guess they understand another party is evolved called the employer.
She denied my daughters claim. My daughter can't work do to major injuries. The hearing the denial and denial letter has taken such a toll on her now she clinically depressed and I fear suicidal. Prior to the disability process she was depressed because she couldn't work. She even went out of her field and took a job as a part time secretary/ office manager. First day four hours ended up at er with fluid build up. Because of her injuries now she has a heart condition. The idiot occupational person says she can do secretarial work with extra breaks. How idiotic when that is type of job that sent her to er. And who hires giving extra breaks. This judge denied her on this uneducated person. Unbelievable. Good luck if you go before her. God bless
It seems pretty safe to say he hasn't got a clue what a claim is about, hasn't really examined a file prior to the hearing, and isn't capable of grasping the issues of a claimant during the hearing either. Other than that, this is a great judge.
It seems pretty safe to say he hasn't got a clue what a claim is about, hasn't really examined a file prior to the hearing, and isn't capable of grasping the issues of a claimant during the hearing either. Other than that, this is a great judge.
It seems pretty safe to say he hasn't got a clue what a claim is about, hasn't really examined a file prior to the hearing, and isn't capable of grasping the issues of a claimant during the hearing either. Other than that, this is a great judge.
It seems pretty safe to say he hasn't got a clue what a claim is about, hasn't really examined a file prior to the hearing, and isn't capable of grasping the issues of a claimant during the hearing either. Other than that, this is a great judge.
A self-absorbed little pissant. Bully. Arbitrary. Mercurial.
A self-absorbed little pissant. Bully. Arbitrary. Mercurial.
A self-absorbed little pissant. Bully. Arbitrary. Mercurial.
A self-absorbed little pissant. Bully. Arbitrary. Mercurial.
I agree with the other post here. I went before him without a lawyer and he pretty much said he didn't want to hear from me and for me to go get a lawyer. I checked his record and he has only fully approved 15 cases while denying 35. You better have a lawyer and a good case if you go before him.
I agree with the other post here. I went before him without a lawyer and he pretty much said he didn't want to hear from me and for me to go get a lawyer. I checked his record and he has only fully approved 15 cases while denying 35. You better have a lawyer and a good case if you go before him.
I agree with the other post here. I went before him without a lawyer and he pretty much said he didn't want to hear from me and for me to go get a lawyer. I checked his record and he has only fully approved 15 cases while denying 35. You better have a lawyer and a good case if you go before him.
Dale is leading the pack on the worst approval rate, which is pretty amazing considering that Fishman is in Atlanta now. Of course, the odds of seeing him for a hearing is slim, since he has only heard 31 cases since October 1 at the beginning of the fiscal calendar. It makes one wonder - how does this ALJ justify his princely salary?
Dale is leading the pack on the worst approval rate, which is pretty amazing considering that Fishman is in Atlanta now. Of course, the odds of seeing him for a hearing is slim, since he has only heard 31 cases since October 1 at the beginning of the fiscal calendar. It makes one wonder - how does this ALJ justify his princely salary?
Dale is leading the pack on the worst approval rate, which is pretty amazing considering that Fishman is in Atlanta now. Of course, the odds of seeing him for a hearing is slim, since he has only heard 31 cases since October 1 at the beginning of the fiscal calendar. It makes one wonder - how does this ALJ justify his princely salary?
Dale is leading the pack on the worst approval rate, which is pretty amazing considering that Fishman is in Atlanta now. Of course, the odds of seeing him for a hearing is slim, since he has only heard 31 cases since October 1 at the beginning of the fiscal calendar. It makes one wonder - how does this ALJ justify his princely salary?
Which Judge Glendening will show up on any given day? I've seen days where he approves all 5 cases without a second thought. Other days, he denies them all. It does not seem to be about merit.
Which Judge Glendening will show up on any given day? I've seen days where he approves all 5 cases without a second thought. Other days, he denies them all. It does not seem to be about merit.
Which Judge Glendening will show up on any given day? I've seen days where he approves all 5 cases without a second thought. Other days, he denies them all. It does not seem to be about merit.
What a bunch of whiners & losers. I have known this judge for years. If you are disabled, he pays the case. Those of you who are trying to cheat the system, you deserve what you get. It's people like you who clog up the system so those who are truly disabled have to wait. And yes, he does review the files before he has hearings. You claimants' reps are not only lazy, you're clueless. Why not try doing your job right for a change, instead of pissing and moaning about a judge who disagrees with you becuase he realizes your claimant is faking.
What a bunch of whiners & losers. I have known this judge for years. If you are disabled, he pays the case. Those of you who are trying to cheat the system, you deserve what you get. It's people like you who clog up the system so those who are truly disabled have to wait. And yes, he does review the files before he has hearings. You claimants' reps are not only lazy, you're clueless. Why not try doing your job right for a change, instead of pissing and moaning about a judge who disagrees with you becuase he realizes your claimant is faking.
What a bunch of whiners & losers. I have known this judge for years. If you are disabled, he pays the case. Those of you who are trying to cheat the system, you deserve what you get. It's people like you who clog up the system so those who are truly disabled have to wait. And yes, he does review the files before he has hearings. You claimants' reps are not only lazy, you're clueless. Why not try doing your job right for a change, instead of pissing and moaning about a judge who disagrees with you becuase he realizes your claimant is faking.
i feel no judge should ever make an impartial decesion since his title does not come under the medical field and no judge can look at a person and tell them how they do or dont feel
i feel no judge should ever make an impartial decesion since his title does not come under the medical field and no judge can look at a person and tell them how they do or dont feel
i feel no judge should ever make an impartial decesion since his title does not come under the medical field and no judge can look at a person and tell them how they do or dont feel
He was extremely professional and had read the file. He was quick to hone in on areas of exaggeration or problematic testimony. He could combat overstatement by relying on evidence in the record and he required evidence for all broad statements or conjecture. Firm, but fair.
He was extremely professional and had read the file. He was quick to hone in on areas of exaggeration or problematic testimony. He could combat overstatement by relying on evidence in the record and he required evidence for all broad statements or conjecture. Firm, but fair.
He was extremely professional and had read the file. He was quick to hone in on areas of exaggeration or problematic testimony. He could combat overstatement by relying on evidence in the record and he required evidence for all broad statements or conjecture. Firm, but fair.
He is slow to issue opinions and slow to schedule your hearings. He adds another 12 months to your case if assigned.
This ALJ has a 2% approval rate for Fiscal Year 2015. Draw your own conclusions.
I think he is Bias and he does not take the time to review the facts of his cases. I have been before this judge 3 times and had medical records proving my disability and he denied me within 10 days and closed out my case. The reason I feel like he has his picks, is because I filed before the appeals counsel and they reopened my case, sent it back, and told him to review it again.
My records speak for themselves. However, when a judge makes decisions based on how he chooses to rewrite records - I take issue with that. His warbled decision has left me desolate. The sad thing is that he will continue this behavior as long as he is in that position. It's scary to know he controlled not only my well being but countless others, as his record states. Perhaps a lesson in the difference between a heart attack and cardiac arrest (which is what I actually suffered) would be a great start. Then let's teach him about the psychological after effects of said experience along with an extreme medical history of cardiac issues that was also voided to said judge but never once mentioned in decision. Or how about the fact that I did not smoke for 15-20 years @2 packs a day, as he claimed. Or the fact that I wasn't admitted to the hospital a few months later for a "panic attack" but for Ventricular Tachycardia which is a constant extremely rapid heart best - and into open heart surgery within a week thereafter. (240 beats a minutes for episodes of 2-3 minutes at a time) but that's a panic attack??? Getting psychological treatment is difficult with no insurance and not even being able to determine all physical issues. Back issues are difficult to prove when doctor no longer has records available and no "surgical" treatment" was received - Ben after informed said judge that due to pretty much lifelong use of anticoagulants tends to dissuade certain surgical procedures. Really? These are just a few examples of his inability to correctly interpret and understand medical terminology, which makes me ask.....WHY IS HE STILL EMPLOYED???
I feel that judge hagler did not take all my physical problems into consideration, my whole body hurts all the time and she said I could go back to the collection, office work I used to do, I would rather die. I was just barely able to keep my job then. I was even seeing the employee assist counselor there.i hope she knows she has ruined my life and I will probably lose what little we have. I have been paying into ss since 1974. I am 59 now and have worked hard all my life, I never took any handouts from anyone
Nice guy. Misleading, in that he will lead you to think one way about his hypotheticals, and later determines a less restrictive hypothetical to be more appropriate. Often has not read the case by the time of the hearing.
Nice guy. Misleading, in that he will lead you to think one way about his hypotheticals, and later determines a less restrictive hypothetical to be more appropriate. Often has not read the case by the time of the hearing.
Nice guy. Misleading, in that he will lead you to think one way about his hypotheticals, and later determines a less restrictive hypothetical to be more appropriate. Often has not read the case by the time of the hearing.
Nice guy. Misleading, in that he will lead you to think one way about his hypotheticals, and later determines a less restrictive hypothetical to be more appropriate. Often has not read the case by the time of the hearing.
Review the number of approval percentages below, and ask yourself the question, "Did the law change in 2013, or did the ALJ change?" One should expect better from this ALJ, who is a good man, but has clearly succumbed to internal pressures.
Awesome judge fair and equitable
I went before Judge Robert T. Jackson, Jr last year for my disability hearing and received a full favorable disabiltiy and soon after that I was told that my case was being reviewed. My biggest problem is that I have been trying to get my disability since August of 2007, I was unable to get it then last year after all this time I was told that they are reviwing what he did my issue is that how can you have someone doing a job then turn around and change your minds about his position. I am a single parent with a 14 year old son I have lost my home and car as a resolute of the going back and forth that I have been through during the last 4 years how can I get any help if you tie the judges hands when he makes a choice in giving a person there disability.
I went before Judge Robert T. Jackson, Jr last year for my disability hearing and received a full favorable disabiltiy and soon after that I was told that my case was being reviewed. My biggest problem is that I have been trying to get my disability since August of 2007, I was unable to get it then last year after all this time I was told that they are reviwing what he did my issue is that how can you have someone doing a job then turn around and change your minds about his position. I am a single parent with a 14 year old son I have lost my home and car as a resolute of the going back and forth that I have been through during the last 4 years how can I get any help if you tie the judges hands when he makes a choice in giving a person there disability.
I went before Judge Robert T. Jackson, Jr last year for my disability hearing and received a full favorable disabiltiy and soon after that I was told that my case was being reviewed. My biggest problem is that I have been trying to get my disability since August of 2007, I was unable to get it then last year after all this time I was told that they are reviwing what he did my issue is that how can you have someone doing a job then turn around and change your minds about his position. I am a single parent with a 14 year old son I have lost my home and car as a resolute of the going back and forth that I have been through during the last 4 years how can I get any help if you tie the judges hands when he makes a choice in giving a person there disability.
I went before Judge Robert T. Jackson, Jr last year for my disability hearing and received a full favorable disabiltiy and soon after that I was told that my case was being reviewed. My biggest problem is that I have been trying to get my disability since August of 2007, I was unable to get it then last year after all this time I was told that they are reviwing what he did my issue is that how can you have someone doing a job then turn around and change your minds about his position. I am a single parent with a 14 year old son I have lost my home and car as a resolute of the going back and forth that I have been through during the last 4 years how can I get any help if you tie the judges hands when he makes a choice in giving a person there disability.
Judge Jackson will literally wear out the claimant on postural and exertional limitations, so prepare well beforehand. Seems generally oriented toward the claimant. Not afraid to make a decision before all evidence is received.
Judge Jackson will literally wear out the claimant on postural and exertional limitations, so prepare well beforehand. Seems generally oriented toward the claimant. Not afraid to make a decision before all evidence is received.
Judge Jackson will literally wear out the claimant on postural and exertional limitations, so prepare well beforehand. Seems generally oriented toward the claimant. Not afraid to make a decision before all evidence is received.
Judge Jackson will literally wear out the claimant on postural and exertional limitations, so prepare well beforehand. Seems generally oriented toward the claimant. Not afraid to make a decision before all evidence is received.
I have been waiting since July 11th for a decision. Everytime my lawyer checks the status it's still on the judges desk. Can anyone tell me how long does it take for him to give a decision..geesh. I'm losing everything! !!
I have been waiting since July 11th for a decision. Everytime my lawyer checks the status it's still on the judges desk. Can anyone tell me how long does it take for him to give a decision..geesh. I'm losing everything! !!
I have been waiting since July 11th for a decision. Everytime my lawyer checks the status it's still on the judges desk. Can anyone tell me how long does it take for him to give a decision..geesh. I'm losing everything! !!
hello my name is john hamilton. this judge was really great an straight too the point an very compassionate to the claimant
hello my name is bobby holley i currently went to court an had judge jackson jan 15 2018 at nine am . my hearing had me very nervous at first but i calm down once i starting talking. the judge was very understanding an asked me what were my limitations an asked me how does my condition affect my everyday life. he talked too my attorney about my conditions of my mental illness an my surgerys in the past. after my hearing i was told to wait 4to six weeks for a decision. as of june 19 2018 i can say thank god i was approved an the wait is over . i just wanted too say to anyone that goes too court too be very honiest an striat to the point let your case speak for itself . an as for the judge thank u for your time an hearing my case.
Extremely pleasant. Generally non-confrontational, but not a bleeding heart. Seems to pay much attention to testimony - nearly as much as to the evidence in file.
Extremely pleasant. Generally non-confrontational, but not a bleeding heart. Seems to pay much attention to testimony - nearly as much as to the evidence in file.
Extremely pleasant. Generally non-confrontational, but not a bleeding heart. Seems to pay much attention to testimony - nearly as much as to the evidence in file.
Extremely pleasant. Generally non-confrontational, but not a bleeding heart. Seems to pay much attention to testimony - nearly as much as to the evidence in file.
I don't feel she is fair. One would have to meet her on their dying bed. She sees color when she makes her decisions. I feel she does everything she can to make you drop your case even if you are living on the streets. You can be assured that if she had her way everyone would be denied.
To whoever wrote the comment about Judge Joys, she has not been at the atlanta downtown hearing office in a long time, so are you talking about an old case or did you recently have a hearing? If you had a new hearing in atlanta it was not likely Judge Joys but i could be wrong
I FIND JUDGE RANDI E LAPPIN TO BE A HONORABLE KIND AND JUST PERSON IN POWER SHE REALLY LISTENS TO YOU AND IS EASY TO TALK TO SHE TOOK THE TIME TO REALLY LOOK AT MY CASE AND I AM GLAD OF THE FAIRNESS I RECEIVED I HAVE NOT GOTTEN MY DECISION YET HOWEVER NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS APPROVED DENIED OR WHATEVER I AM STILL GLAD SHE TREATED ME WITH RESPECT AS A HUMAN OF COURSE I WOULD BE HAPPY WITH A FAVORABLE DECISION HOWEVER IF NOT I HAVE TO HOLD MY HEAD HIGH AND KEEP FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT BLESSED BE TO YOU HONORABLE JUDGE RANDI E LAPPIN
WORKPLACE BULLY!
WORKPLACE BULLY!
WORKPLACE BULLY!
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
Judge Littlefield had made statements of SSA Juvenile law statutes in reference my sons disability case, and my sons age is 22. When we brought up that the SSA statute should be referenced because my son is now 22, Judge Littlefield did not acknowledge the one that we were bringing up. I can't believe that a twenty minute talk with the SSA doctor would be more credible than years in the Marcus institute in Atlanta, and the full diagnosis from the Emory Autism Center along with notable Dr. Leslie Rubin. She gives me the feeling she may have become routine instead of a case by case Judge like her earlier record indicates.
Judge Littlefield was very welcoming from the time I walked in. She asked straight to the point questions, and I felt that she really took a look at my records. The VE never said a word. Then she started talking to my attorney saying terms I didn't understand and talking dates. My attorney walked me out side and stated she would find me disabled at my hearing if I changed my onset date. From Sept 2014 to April 2015. I had no problem doing that. My hearing last maybe 10-15 mins. A word of advise is to let your records speak for themself. Don't over exaggerate, because they know when you do.
Over 1000 pages of medical records and having several listed disabilities with multiple doctor physical assessment forms stating unable to work. I also am in cancer recovery. DENIED. I don't under stand how these people come up with there decisions or what there looking for.They must flip a coin. nice enough judge, but his skills as a judge are definitely in question.
Jerry Lovitt is an arrogant douche, I also had pages on pages of statements and facts from multiple doctors and specialists saying flat out NO HE CANNOT WORK, but he still denied me and acted like I bought my can at Walmart for effect, I even had 2 separate prescriptions for my cane.
What a hoot! Seems to have his mind made up by the time we sit down. Holds 6 minute hearings. Gives great weight to RFCs. Somewhat of a "Nero" approach, either thumbs up or thumbs down, without excessive narrative. Does not like substance use or middle aged women with mental health issues.
What a hoot! Seems to have his mind made up by the time we sit down. Holds 6 minute hearings. Gives great weight to RFCs. Somewhat of a "Nero" approach, either thumbs up or thumbs down, without excessive narrative. Does not like substance use or middle aged women with mental health issues.
What a hoot! Seems to have his mind made up by the time we sit down. Holds 6 minute hearings. Gives great weight to RFCs. Somewhat of a "Nero" approach, either thumbs up or thumbs down, without excessive narrative. Does not like substance use or middle aged women with mental health issues.
What a hoot! Seems to have his mind made up by the time we sit down. Holds 6 minute hearings. Gives great weight to RFCs. Somewhat of a "Nero" approach, either thumbs up or thumbs down, without excessive narrative. Does not like substance use or middle aged women with mental health issues.
I was denied even though I have more than 4,000 pages of medical records, dozens of doctors supporting my claim and submitting written statements, and the court-appointed vocational expert testified that there was not a job I was suitable to do. Mcgrath ruled against this suggestion and said I could do a job that did not require standing, sitting, working with my hands, concentration, memory, interaction with people, and would allow me to lie down for extended periods of time each hour. I also require a caretaker (who is writing this message as I am unable to do so) on a fulltime basis to feed, cloth, bathe, drive, make appointments and manage my dr. schedule, clean, cook, and take care of basically all of my needs/activities of daily living. He made the decision in less than 5 minutes and asked me less than 10 quick questions. His decision was overturned on appeal and has been sent back to be heard in court for a second time. I first applied for disability in 1999 and have spent the last 6 years appealing his ruling. I am going back to court in the next 6 months or so and will let you know who I get and the judgement.
I was denied even though I have more than 4,000 pages of medical records, dozens of doctors supporting my claim and submitting written statements, and the court-appointed vocational expert testified that there was not a job I was suitable to do. Mcgrath ruled against this suggestion and said I could do a job that did not require standing, sitting, working with my hands, concentration, memory, interaction with people, and would allow me to lie down for extended periods of time each hour. I also require a caretaker (who is writing this message as I am unable to do so) on a fulltime basis to feed, cloth, bathe, drive, make appointments and manage my dr. schedule, clean, cook, and take care of basically all of my needs/activities of daily living. He made the decision in less than 5 minutes and asked me less than 10 quick questions. His decision was overturned on appeal and has been sent back to be heard in court for a second time. I first applied for disability in 1999 and have spent the last 6 years appealing his ruling. I am going back to court in the next 6 months or so and will let you know who I get and the judgement.
I was denied even though I have more than 4,000 pages of medical records, dozens of doctors supporting my claim and submitting written statements, and the court-appointed vocational expert testified that there was not a job I was suitable to do. Mcgrath ruled against this suggestion and said I could do a job that did not require standing, sitting, working with my hands, concentration, memory, interaction with people, and would allow me to lie down for extended periods of time each hour. I also require a caretaker (who is writing this message as I am unable to do so) on a fulltime basis to feed, cloth, bathe, drive, make appointments and manage my dr. schedule, clean, cook, and take care of basically all of my needs/activities of daily living. He made the decision in less than 5 minutes and asked me less than 10 quick questions. His decision was overturned on appeal and has been sent back to be heard in court for a second time. I first applied for disability in 1999 and have spent the last 6 years appealing his ruling. I am going back to court in the next 6 months or so and will let you know who I get and the judgement.
I was denied even though I have more than 4,000 pages of medical records, dozens of doctors supporting my claim and submitting written statements, and the court-appointed vocational expert testified that there was not a job I was suitable to do. Mcgrath ruled against this suggestion and said I could do a job that did not require standing, sitting, working with my hands, concentration, memory, interaction with people, and would allow me to lie down for extended periods of time each hour. I also require a caretaker (who is writing this message as I am unable to do so) on a fulltime basis to feed, cloth, bathe, drive, make appointments and manage my dr. schedule, clean, cook, and take care of basically all of my needs/activities of daily living. He made the decision in less than 5 minutes and asked me less than 10 quick questions. His decision was overturned on appeal and has been sent back to be heard in court for a second time. I first applied for disability in 1999 and have spent the last 6 years appealing his ruling. I am going back to court in the next 6 months or so and will let you know who I get and the judgement.
Judge Frederick McGrath claimed he could not read the RFC filled out by my doctor because "the doctor's handwriting was not completely legible and his signature was indistinguishable." There were approximately 30 cases he ruled on before he saw me the day of my hearing and it seemed like he had already made up his mind on each case before the people even entered the courtroom. He wrote about my mental health in his official ruling even though my claim was entirely a physical case with all of my mental health issues (depression because I am unable to work) being a direct result of my physical disability.
Judge Frederick McGrath claimed he could not read the RFC filled out by my doctor because "the doctor's handwriting was not completely legible and his signature was indistinguishable." There were approximately 30 cases he ruled on before he saw me the day of my hearing and it seemed like he had already made up his mind on each case before the people even entered the courtroom. He wrote about my mental health in his official ruling even though my claim was entirely a physical case with all of my mental health issues (depression because I am unable to work) being a direct result of my physical disability.
Judge Frederick McGrath claimed he could not read the RFC filled out by my doctor because "the doctor's handwriting was not completely legible and his signature was indistinguishable." There were approximately 30 cases he ruled on before he saw me the day of my hearing and it seemed like he had already made up his mind on each case before the people even entered the courtroom. He wrote about my mental health in his official ruling even though my claim was entirely a physical case with all of my mental health issues (depression because I am unable to work) being a direct result of my physical disability.
Judge Frederick McGrath claimed he could not read the RFC filled out by my doctor because "the doctor's handwriting was not completely legible and his signature was indistinguishable." There were approximately 30 cases he ruled on before he saw me the day of my hearing and it seemed like he had already made up his mind on each case before the people even entered the courtroom. He wrote about my mental health in his official ruling even though my claim was entirely a physical case with all of my mental health issues (depression because I am unable to work) being a direct result of my physical disability.
Yes he has mind made up before the hearing. He schedules way too many hearings on one given day and they are conducted to quick. Rarely uses a VE. The Jacksonville ODAR is filled with fairly negative ALJs.
Yes he has mind made up before the hearing. He schedules way too many hearings on one given day and they are conducted to quick. Rarely uses a VE. The Jacksonville ODAR is filled with fairly negative ALJs.
Yes he has mind made up before the hearing. He schedules way too many hearings on one given day and they are conducted to quick. Rarely uses a VE. The Jacksonville ODAR is filled with fairly negative ALJs.
Yes he has mind made up before the hearing. He schedules way too many hearings on one given day and they are conducted to quick. Rarely uses a VE. The Jacksonville ODAR is filled with fairly negative ALJs.
Our office has had numerous hearings with Judge McGrath. He has a reputation for scheduling several hearings at the same time and taking them on a first come/first served basis; will start early if you get there early; does NOT like submission of medical records on the day of the hearing. Generally does not ask for opening; lets rep do most of questioning and just cuts in when he has a question. I think he often has a good idea of how he feels about a case and uses the hearing to see if it changes his mind. His award rate is not out of line, so he's not denying everything that comes through the room. (Claimants need to understand it isn't the number of pages of records you have, but how well the opinions are supported by clinical evidence, diagnositic testing and your own credibility).
Our office has had numerous hearings with Judge McGrath. He has a reputation for scheduling several hearings at the same time and taking them on a first come/first served basis; will start early if you get there early; does NOT like submission of medical records on the day of the hearing. Generally does not ask for opening; lets rep do most of questioning and just cuts in when he has a question. I think he often has a good idea of how he feels about a case and uses the hearing to see if it changes his mind. His award rate is not out of line, so he's not denying everything that comes through the room. (Claimants need to understand it isn't the number of pages of records you have, but how well the opinions are supported by clinical evidence, diagnositic testing and your own credibility).
Our office has had numerous hearings with Judge McGrath. He has a reputation for scheduling several hearings at the same time and taking them on a first come/first served basis; will start early if you get there early; does NOT like submission of medical records on the day of the hearing. Generally does not ask for opening; lets rep do most of questioning and just cuts in when he has a question. I think he often has a good idea of how he feels about a case and uses the hearing to see if it changes his mind. His award rate is not out of line, so he's not denying everything that comes through the room. (Claimants need to understand it isn't the number of pages of records you have, but how well the opinions are supported by clinical evidence, diagnositic testing and your own credibility).
Our office has had numerous hearings with Judge McGrath. He has a reputation for scheduling several hearings at the same time and taking them on a first come/first served basis; will start early if you get there early; does NOT like submission of medical records on the day of the hearing. Generally does not ask for opening; lets rep do most of questioning and just cuts in when he has a question. I think he often has a good idea of how he feels about a case and uses the hearing to see if it changes his mind. His award rate is not out of line, so he's not denying everything that comes through the room. (Claimants need to understand it isn't the number of pages of records you have, but how well the opinions are supported by clinical evidence, diagnositic testing and your own credibility).
my first claim was DENIED by this alj, even though he stated in his decision that i did in fact have two severe impairments.. of course the AC kept his ruling intact and my atty filed in federal court. well here it is 6 1/2 yrs from initial filing and 3 yrs after it was denied at appeals council and taken to fdc, my claim was remanded due to ERROR by the alj for NOT giving my treating doctors RFC any weight and going by what the ssa med examiner (which i never saw to begin with)said at some point before my initial denial (which only took a few months to get)..my hearing was NOT that quick, and also we waited for at least 15-20 minutes before hearing started as the VE was LATE. mind you judge started without the VE, and he finally arrived about 10 minutes before my hearing was over..he heard me answer the last 2 question is all. yet the judge took his opinion that there were thousands of jobs in the national economy within our region that i could do?? i am like the rest of you, i believe he has his mind made up before you go in the door...well, he messed up on this one and now i get a new hearing and hopefully with another judge
my first claim was DENIED by this alj, even though he stated in his decision that i did in fact have two severe impairments.. of course the AC kept his ruling intact and my atty filed in federal court. well here it is 6 1/2 yrs from initial filing and 3 yrs after it was denied at appeals council and taken to fdc, my claim was remanded due to ERROR by the alj for NOT giving my treating doctors RFC any weight and going by what the ssa med examiner (which i never saw to begin with)said at some point before my initial denial (which only took a few months to get)..my hearing was NOT that quick, and also we waited for at least 15-20 minutes before hearing started as the VE was LATE. mind you judge started without the VE, and he finally arrived about 10 minutes before my hearing was over..he heard me answer the last 2 question is all. yet the judge took his opinion that there were thousands of jobs in the national economy within our region that i could do?? i am like the rest of you, i believe he has his mind made up before you go in the door...well, he messed up on this one and now i get a new hearing and hopefully with another judge
my first claim was DENIED by this alj, even though he stated in his decision that i did in fact have two severe impairments.. of course the AC kept his ruling intact and my atty filed in federal court. well here it is 6 1/2 yrs from initial filing and 3 yrs after it was denied at appeals council and taken to fdc, my claim was remanded due to ERROR by the alj for NOT giving my treating doctors RFC any weight and going by what the ssa med examiner (which i never saw to begin with)said at some point before my initial denial (which only took a few months to get)..my hearing was NOT that quick, and also we waited for at least 15-20 minutes before hearing started as the VE was LATE. mind you judge started without the VE, and he finally arrived about 10 minutes before my hearing was over..he heard me answer the last 2 question is all. yet the judge took his opinion that there were thousands of jobs in the national economy within our region that i could do?? i am like the rest of you, i believe he has his mind made up before you go in the door...well, he messed up on this one and now i get a new hearing and hopefully with another judge
This Judge knows his job. He gets straight to point and does not waste anytime or taxpayers money. He is well prepared. He has an idea of what his decision will be before the hearing. He shows concern about the claimant and takes everything into consideration. He does his job well without hesitation. He can see right through a person if they are full of BS. Great service for the people!
As an attorney, I practice before several Social Security hearings offices and numerous judges throughout the Southeast. My experience with Judge McGrath has been consistently positive, and I have found him to be fair-minded and efficient in his handling of cases where I have appeared before him. While he takes a streamlined, no-nonsense approach to hearings, he appears to do this out of a sense of duty to move his cases efficiently and to minimize delay in resolving claims where claimants have already been required to wait months (or even years) without income leading up to finally getting their day in court.
Judge Frederick McGrath approved my case on yesterday. I believe he's a very witty, smart & compassionate guy....charming & interesting...I may add... My hearing was brief & to the point...The past 21 months of my life has been the most challenging time in my life...happy to know it will get better soon...very thankful I was approved.
He is The hardest working ALJ in the Nation and that office!!!
ALJ McGrath went above and beyond recently, and by his efforts, allowed my client her hearing when there had been a serious miscommunication regarding my client's file (it had been sent to another hearing office by mistake, and the hearing cancelled - all without notice to myself or my client). Another ALJ might have shrugged their shoulders and said nothing could be done, so sorry; ALJ McGrath instead tracked the file down, had it sent back to North, and worked the hearing into his already scheduled docket. While we are still awaiting results, we are grateful to have been able to conduct the hearing as we had planned, especially since my client traveled from TN to Athens for the hearing. Thank you Judge McGrath!
After reading these mixed reviews, I feel intimidated
My wife just had her hearing with Judge McGrath, regardless of the outcome I thought he was very understanding and compassionate toward my wife, took his time in letting her answer questions and even helped her word the correct response when she fumbled,( She was very nervous) Impressed with him stopping the proceeding because of a volume problem and having the people come in and repair so there was no mis-communication. Straight to the point and procedural Judge.
I think she’s a fair judge. I went before her in September and she was thorough and straight to the point. I hope my case is approved
Judge Laura McHenry could you look at my case again if you don't mind this is Dexter I sent you some information about my case I would like case be open and look at I am trying to get my dad social security like for my case to be reopen this is Dexter Berry 260-41-2952 I left Mrs Velda voice mail on the phone
To whom it may concern to jugde Laura McHenry I need to no do I have to wait on election in August or Novmber for my case to be heard again so please let me no because I file appeal also let your secretary no so she can set me letter thank you to go back on vtc screening or sent me a letter to the federal supreme Court call me678791-9747 Thank you
Excellent judge. Thoroughly reviews claimant's file before the hearing. Concise and to the point while still being polite, professional and compassionate.
Professional & Knowledgeable Judge and entire Staff!
Presenting my case before Judge McMichael was an awesome and educational experience. I have not received my approval or denial letter yet, but I am satisfied with the professionalism she displayed. I did my homework on the appeals process and she really did hers reviewing records. Very thorough Judge.
I had two hearings in front of ALJ McMichael today under very trying circumstances. My uncle was in ICU, his life hanging on by a thread. I was 5 minutes late for the hearing but had warned all necessary parties. Everything was fine until the ALJ seemed to care about keeping her schedule than being compassionate, a tenant of her job. In between hearing I voiced my displeasure with the lack of professionalism displayed by the ALJ. Mainly, that they can be late for whatever reason they feel necessary, yet I have a life or death situation and they could care less. Well fast forward, she calls me in knowing all of this and not knowing my uncle passed during the first hearing. She then proceeds to bring up the fact I’ve been fired previously as well as question when exactly my uncle died in order to support her nasty attack on me. SHE QUESTIONED DURING WHICH HEARING HE PASSED DURING!! If she as paying attention she would’ve noticed how visibly upset I was simply by the continued use of tissues. This was the most disgusting display of unprofessionalism I have ever witnessed, and from a federal judge. If it were any other profession she would’ve been fired on the spot. She is a nasty, unforgiving, cold, inhumane, and a flat out mean woman. Good luck having your case in front of her.
The most unprofessional, unprepared "professional" (I use this terminology loosely) I have ever encountered. She started my hearing 45 minutes late, refused me access to my file, threatened me with a bad judgement for not owning responsibility for her lack of preparation, wasted my time and failed to provide resolution or clarification on a case pending for the last 11 yrs. I wish I could speak directly to her superiors and encourage them to pull the recording from the hearing. She should be fired!!!
Nice lady. A lot younger than what i expected, but she was really nice and pretty. My attorney told me she used to represent claimants. . She got to the point and didn't beat around bush so I liked that about her.
Nice lady. A lot younger than what i expected, but she was really nice and pretty. My attorney told me she used to represent claimants. . She got to the point and didn't beat around bush so I liked that about her.
Nice lady. A lot younger than what i expected, but she was really nice and pretty. My attorney told me she used to represent claimants. . She got to the point and didn't beat around bush so I liked that about her.
Nice lady. A lot younger than what i expected, but she was really nice and pretty. My attorney told me she used to represent claimants. . She got to the point and didn't beat around bush so I liked that about her.
Brilliant attorney, and an even more brilliant human being. I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to work under her for a period of time. She was practicing in Bowling Green, KY during that time at Breen & Morgan, a small but successful law firm where I primarily served and assumed the responsibilities of the "Runner", assuring that priority documentation was filed at the local Warren County Courthouse before the scheduled deadlines, ensuring there would be no problems or unforeseen obstacles once litigation was scheduled to begin. I was also given the chance to embark on a "case file transfer" project, whereby my singular goal was to transfer any and all cases heard by the firm within the previous 25 years (which had previously been kept on paper) into a streamlined, user-friendly, case organization program on the computer.. what a great experience. Rarely does a young PreLaw undergraduate student get to place his hands on such material, but Kerry trusted me to handle it, and because of that, I was exposed to more material in one summer than most law students before entering their 3rd year of law school! I've missed her greatly since she called all of us to her office and broke the "good news" that she was moving to Atlanta!!... bitter sweet.. so many tears. Hope all is well with you and the family, Kerry. Thanks for everything!
This judge was very nice. She did do my disability in my favor but I just want to know how long does it take to get anything written or any money
The Judge (Morriss) selected the incorrect job title for my case. Procurement Forester, not procurement clerk. The Judge was given my job description. hHe should have known the one he chose was incorrect.
The Judge (Morriss) selected the incorrect job title for my case. Procurement Forester, not procurement clerk. The Judge was given my job description. hHe should have known the one he chose was incorrect.
The Judge (Morriss) selected the incorrect job title for my case. Procurement Forester, not procurement clerk. The Judge was given my job description. hHe should have known the one he chose was incorrect.
I just found out that Judge Morriss is going to be my ALJ. Looking at his statistics, I am wondering if I should even bother going. My disability has been life changing for my whole family, but I now doubt that I am going to see a dime of the money I worked to pay into the system that is supposed to protect me should I become disabled. His approval rating is 16% less than ALL ALJ's in his office. That to me sounds like he is more likely to deny cases that other judges would approve. I sincerely hope that I receive a fair chance at trial, but I have my doubts. There are no other comments here regarding this judge, but I am preparing for what will most likely be a loss. I did find out that judges review the case before the cases are scheduled to determine if there is enough evidence to make a favorable decision without a hearing. If the case is reviewed prior to scheduling, why would the outcome be any different 30 days later? It would seem any judge has already made up their mind before going to hearing. That borders on prejudice if you ask me. I hope that I am wrong about this judge and his record. I hope that I am the 1 in 4 that wins. If not, I have no idea how we are going to make it. I worked for this insurance, it was not handed to me/
I just found out that Judge Morriss is going to be my ALJ. Looking at his statistics, I am wondering if I should even bother going. My disability has been life changing for my whole family, but I now doubt that I am going to see a dime of the money I worked to pay into the system that is supposed to protect me should I become disabled. His approval rating is 16% less than ALL ALJ's in his office. That to me sounds like he is more likely to deny cases that other judges would approve. I sincerely hope that I receive a fair chance at trial, but I have my doubts. There are no other comments here regarding this judge, but I am preparing for what will most likely be a loss. I did find out that judges review the case before the cases are scheduled to determine if there is enough evidence to make a favorable decision without a hearing. If the case is reviewed prior to scheduling, why would the outcome be any different 30 days later? It would seem any judge has already made up their mind before going to hearing. That borders on prejudice if you ask me. I hope that I am wrong about this judge and his record. I hope that I am the 1 in 4 that wins. If not, I have no idea how we are going to make it. I worked for this insurance, it was not handed to me/
I just found out that Judge Morriss is going to be my ALJ. Looking at his statistics, I am wondering if I should even bother going. My disability has been life changing for my whole family, but I now doubt that I am going to see a dime of the money I worked to pay into the system that is supposed to protect me should I become disabled. His approval rating is 16% less than ALL ALJ's in his office. That to me sounds like he is more likely to deny cases that other judges would approve. I sincerely hope that I receive a fair chance at trial, but I have my doubts. There are no other comments here regarding this judge, but I am preparing for what will most likely be a loss. I did find out that judges review the case before the cases are scheduled to determine if there is enough evidence to make a favorable decision without a hearing. If the case is reviewed prior to scheduling, why would the outcome be any different 30 days later? It would seem any judge has already made up their mind before going to hearing. That borders on prejudice if you ask me. I hope that I am wrong about this judge and his record. I hope that I am the 1 in 4 that wins. If not, I have no idea how we are going to make it. I worked for this insurance, it was not handed to me/
I feel that this judge never takes the time to review a persons file. He has a preconceived notion that everyone should get a denial. His verdict has been overturned due to neglecting evidence in file numerous times. Some cases are easily found on a web search. His hearings are a waste of tax dollars. No matter how much medical evidence you have, you have a better chance of seeing God before getting an approval from this judge.
I feel that this judge never takes the time to review a persons file. He has a preconceived notion that everyone should get a denial. His verdict has been overturned due to neglecting evidence in file numerous times. Some cases are easily found on a web search. His hearings are a waste of tax dollars. No matter how much medical evidence you have, you have a better chance of seeing God before getting an approval from this judge.
I feel that this judge never takes the time to review a persons file. He has a preconceived notion that everyone should get a denial. His verdict has been overturned due to neglecting evidence in file numerous times. Some cases are easily found on a web search. His hearings are a waste of tax dollars. No matter how much medical evidence you have, you have a better chance of seeing God before getting an approval from this judge.
I had a hearing with this judge in October. It is now almost March. Only one action has been taken on my case. I was informed by SSA that he has 6 months to make a decision. It seems as though he is going to take every moment of that time to make a decision. If you happen to read this Judge Morriss, you should consider that citizens (you know..the people who worked and paid taxes?) can't sustain years without income. The time you take to deny far more claims than you approve can leave people homeless, and penniless. I understand that you must consider all arguments, but these delays are cruel and damaging to families. All I can say is that while I found you to be polite and professional, your lengthy decision making process is unfair. If you believe that every disabled person should wait this long after an already long hearing process, you do not have our interests at heart. While you collect a paycheck, some of us are struggling to feed our families. I worked for this insurance. I got hurt. I didn't ask for this. I am sure that I will not be one of the few that you feel qualifies for the insurance I paid into because I had the misfortune of being randomly assigned to your docket. All I can say is that I hope you are a better person in the real world than you are within ODAR. I will appeal my case to next level, and it will be overturned or I will file a new claim and hope that I get a judge who realizes that those cases stacking up in front of them represent real people who need their cases heard and answered. God bless you, Judge Morriss. Everyone has to answer to someone for their indifference and hatred for those less fortunate than ourselves.
I had a hearing with this judge in October. It is now almost March. Only one action has been taken on my case. I was informed by SSA that he has 6 months to make a decision. It seems as though he is going to take every moment of that time to make a decision. If you happen to read this Judge Morriss, you should consider that citizens (you know..the people who worked and paid taxes?) can't sustain years without income. The time you take to deny far more claims than you approve can leave people homeless, and penniless. I understand that you must consider all arguments, but these delays are cruel and damaging to families. All I can say is that while I found you to be polite and professional, your lengthy decision making process is unfair. If you believe that every disabled person should wait this long after an already long hearing process, you do not have our interests at heart. While you collect a paycheck, some of us are struggling to feed our families. I worked for this insurance. I got hurt. I didn't ask for this. I am sure that I will not be one of the few that you feel qualifies for the insurance I paid into because I had the misfortune of being randomly assigned to your docket. All I can say is that I hope you are a better person in the real world than you are within ODAR. I will appeal my case to next level, and it will be overturned or I will file a new claim and hope that I get a judge who realizes that those cases stacking up in front of them represent real people who need their cases heard and answered. God bless you, Judge Morriss. Everyone has to answer to someone for their indifference and hatred for those less fortunate than ourselves.
I had a hearing with this judge in October. It is now almost March. Only one action has been taken on my case. I was informed by SSA that he has 6 months to make a decision. It seems as though he is going to take every moment of that time to make a decision. If you happen to read this Judge Morriss, you should consider that citizens (you know..the people who worked and paid taxes?) can't sustain years without income. The time you take to deny far more claims than you approve can leave people homeless, and penniless. I understand that you must consider all arguments, but these delays are cruel and damaging to families. All I can say is that while I found you to be polite and professional, your lengthy decision making process is unfair. If you believe that every disabled person should wait this long after an already long hearing process, you do not have our interests at heart. While you collect a paycheck, some of us are struggling to feed our families. I worked for this insurance. I got hurt. I didn't ask for this. I am sure that I will not be one of the few that you feel qualifies for the insurance I paid into because I had the misfortune of being randomly assigned to your docket. All I can say is that I hope you are a better person in the real world than you are within ODAR. I will appeal my case to next level, and it will be overturned or I will file a new claim and hope that I get a judge who realizes that those cases stacking up in front of them represent real people who need their cases heard and answered. God bless you, Judge Morriss. Everyone has to answer to someone for their indifference and hatred for those less fortunate than ourselves.
My fiancé had a hearing had 3 strokes and a (ve) expert put her out of work And couldn't perform occ. Task and would be a danger to the work place And to Coworkers and benefit from funds management he had less weight to that and great weight from state workers that never examined her So to get short this judge can retired And Quiet ruineing people lifes because he can bout to lose home now waited 3years to get so dismolished by one Guy Who seen me one time in his life that's not fair come on SC get the system right for propler thst really need it and grt rid of the judge that accidentally got 1 STAR THAT'S TO MUCH RETIRED
I found out a few hours ago Judge Morriss is going to be my ALJ. I am really scared now because I need this so bad but it doesn't look like he is a fair judge. Can you change who you appear before?
My husband is 90% disabled with a joint finding of the VA and DOD rating scale. He was denied by Judge Morriss after waiting almost the full 6 months for his decision. Two medical boards found that he was unable to do any reasonable/relatable work and that he was no longer able to function under the normal requirements of the general work force and still denied by Judge Morriss! We are currently asking for an appeal on the council level and I truly hope his stats finally reach the appropriate eyes and something is done about him.
I had the unfortunate circumstance to have Judge Morriss as my judge for my hearing. I thought that only after a hearing can a judge make a decision. Isn't that what a hearing is for? This judge determined my case unfavorable before the hearing. A vocational expert was not in attendance. The only reason why a vocation expert would not be in attendance is if the judge decided he is definitely going to find the outcome favorable or definitely find it unfavorable. The 17% approval rate and a 62% denial rate says everything anyone needs to know about him. This is not free money Judge Morriss. I paid over 45 years into Social Security. I hope that Judge Morriss or anyone in his family does not have to suffer hardships and have to go groveling to a man like him. Judge Morriss - There but for the grace of God go I. Shame on you.
I had my hearing in October 2014 with Judge Morris and I am happy to say that I I just received a fully favorable decision in the mail. I had come here and read comments about this judge many times before court and was scared to death to appear in front of him. I kept calm and talked to my attorney basically while he listened. He only asked me a handful of questions, there was no VE or ME present and I thought sure I was going to lose. I answered all the questions as truthfully as I could and didn't try to sugarcoat anything. Everything I said matched my medical papers. He listened to my answers and was very nice when he spoke to me. So, for those reading now although he is a tough judge he does give approvals. I pray for those going through all this. It is hard and I was very close to being homeless. With the help of my children we have barely made it. I am still waiting for benefits so I am not out of the water yet. God Bless the ones coming to this site now.
I had my hearing October 30,2014. I had been here and read many posts about judge Morris and was terrified to go before him. I am happy to say that I did get a "fully favorable" decision. He was very professional. Most of the time I was talking to my lawyer while he listened. He only asked me a handful questions and I thought sure he was gonna deny me. I was honest,didn't try to sugarcoat anything and everything I said was backed by medical records. So, for those reading, he is a tough judge but he "does" approve some people. I just happen to be one of the lucky ones! Good luck to all that are fighting for disability. I feel your pain, it took me 2 yrs this time and I still haven't received any money. By the way, this was my 2nd time for filing. I was denied in 2000. Prayers for you who are still fighting.
This man is utterly clueless. He hasn't got the faintest idea how to apply Social Security's Rulings to the facts. For example, he found, without the aid of a VE, that a limitation to frequent handling and fingering has no impact on the light, unskilled job base. The Appeals Council will be busy dealing with these decisions.
I am 100% disable permanent and total through the VA with serve PTSD and Depression among other things. In the hearing he asked me if I ever seen a bomb/mortar exploded which I answered the question with a No because if I have seen one explode I won't be here today. I served 2 tours in Iraq and Afghanistan and He denied me because he said that I haven't seen any kind life altering trauma. Also my doctor wrote a letter whom I have been seeing for 2 going on 3 years stating my mental condition. Again, that didn't hold enough weight with him. He wrote that I don't have PTSD and my Anxiety is the main issue. I guess he is a doctor as well.
I think all Judges after my experience with this one should have to be educated on AUTISM TERMINOLOGY how can someone judge something they know nothing about .Even though I tried to help him. VOCAL TICS OR VOCAL STIMMS ARE NOT THE SAME THING AS BED WETTING.Ha Ha Ha .And how can a child be pre school age in the year 2015 But as written this same child be in kindergarten in 2014 being evaluated by the school. I don't know does not add up to me. And how did this child only go to 9 therapies when for two years we have been going to 4 therapies a week with 6 therapies in total all of them once a week for two years .This as well does not add up. Does it ?And no mention or did you notice the physical impairment of this poor child .You did not see that he had leg braces on .Shame Shame Shame. Well I will say one thing because of this experience with this judge I will not stop till all disability judges have to take a course and be certified that they pass that course to be able to judge AUTISM. I am not just my sons mother but I am also my sons advocate surprise ! Help is on the way AUTISM COMMUNITY . I will not stop we all have enough on us .We want help and we want answers.
MY CHILD IS STILL AUTISTIC MR.MORRISS AND STILL GOING TO THERAPIES JUST THOUGHT I WOULD LET YOU KNOW .WE HAVE HAD TO STOP SOME OF HIS THERAPIES .BECAUSE WE COULD NOT AFFORD TO KEEP DOING THEM .THANKS TO YOU AND YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING AUTISM AT ALL.HAVE A GREAT DAY SIR.
He’s terrible!! My hearing lasted 12 minutes. He asked me 3 questions and there was No Vocational Expert. I just got a denial letter. This is insane!
How does a Federal Judge rule in favor for someone to obtain thier SSDI? Been before Morris 2X; he refused to take his own VE testimony, along with some 50+ exhibits. I have been to Federal Court 2X and Appeals in Falls Church VA. 4X. All ruling in my favor. Been before Two different ALJ at ODAR Charleston SC. I am awaiting ruling from another ALJ currently. It's going on 3 years since I had a favorable ruling overturning ALJ Morris latest ruling. Prefer not to give my name in fear of jeopardizing my current review.
Judge Edward T. Morriss is a really Nasty human being which I believe is Racist! I was diagnosed with Brain Cancer and I had to stop working all together. I was appointed to this judge and I was denied consistently with me having a great lawyer and with all of my doctors showing paperwork and medical records. He doesn’t care if you are prone to seizures headaches brain cancer or any type of cancer depression anxiety memory loss vertigo etc, This man does not care! It’s like he bases all of his decisions on appearance and without a Vocational Expert! I have been dealing with disability over 5yrs now and I am currently at Federal Hearing and he still denied my case once again! I am to the point where I just wanna give up on everything even life because I cannot survive anymore! He really doesn’t even care about the paperwork or anything if you’re Caucasian you would have a better shot at your hearing. This is so sad that this judge is making decisions based on looks and not facts..This is just Sad. If anyone can help me find the correct person to file a complaint I would.
This dude knows nothing about autism he thought stimming ment bed wetting how can he judge things when he knows nothing about it.You Sir .need to go back to school .We had won our case after you so that says you judged my disabled CHILD wrong shame on you .And you also tried to make it out like I was not telling the truth .How dare you.I want to sue you that all the cases you have had with CHILDREN with AUTISM need to be looked at again.Because you know nothing about it.I also want you to have to spend 80 hours in therapies that we have to go to.So you can hear the parents and what we deal with .I also want you to have to go back to school to learn all about this epidemic .And get a certification for it or get off the bench .You Sir, are a boil on the butt of humanity.And should be ashamed of yourself.
This dude knows nothing about autism he thought stimming ment bed wetting how can he judge things when he knows nothing about it.You Sir .need to go back to school .We had won our case after you so that says you judged my disabled CHILD wrong shame on you .And you also tried to make it out like I was not telling the truth .How dare you.I want to sue you that all the cases you have had with CHILDREN with AUTISM need to be looked at again.Because you know nothing about it.I also want you to have to spend 80 hours in therapies that we have to go to.So you can hear the parents and what we deal with .I also want you to have to go back to school to learn all about this epidemic .And get a certification for it or get off the bench .You Sir, are a boil on the butt of humanity.And should be ashamed of yourself.
Gentlemanly. Seems to have studied the file beforehand, and has more than an inkling of how to proceed to a decision.
Gentlemanly. Seems to have studied the file beforehand, and has more than an inkling of how to proceed to a decision.
Gentlemanly. Seems to have studied the file beforehand, and has more than an inkling of how to proceed to a decision.
Gentlemanly. Seems to have studied the file beforehand, and has more than an inkling of how to proceed to a decision.
Seems to start every hearing with, "Now I'm a federal judge. Don't lie to me, now. Can you be truthful?" Just be prepared for it.
Seems to start every hearing with, "Now I'm a federal judge. Don't lie to me, now. Can you be truthful?" Just be prepared for it.
Seems to start every hearing with, "Now I'm a federal judge. Don't lie to me, now. Can you be truthful?" Just be prepared for it.
I really appriciated that he asked my daughter(who I am filing for) to leave before we talked about her condition. It's really hard to make your kids feel as "normal" as possible then turn around and let her hear about how she will never be "normal". The judge we had before made her stay in the room.
I really appriciated that he asked my daughter(who I am filing for) to leave before we talked about her condition. It's really hard to make your kids feel as "normal" as possible then turn around and let her hear about how she will never be "normal". The judge we had before made her stay in the room.
I really appriciated that he asked my daughter(who I am filing for) to leave before we talked about her condition. It's really hard to make your kids feel as "normal" as possible then turn around and let her hear about how she will never be "normal". The judge we had before made her stay in the room.
Judge Murray was very professional I appreciate his fairness. He was complimentary to me for being a great support for my wife. Thank You
Judge Murray was very professional I appreciate his fairness. He was complimentary to me for being a great support for my wife. Thank You
Judge Murray was very professional I appreciate his fairness. He was complimentary to me for being a great support for my wife. Thank You
The whole process was intimidating at first, but he soon made me feel very comfortable. I felt like he cold sympathize with me. Whether I approved or not, I don't know, but he was nice.
Judge Murray was very organized and concerned about my son. He is really a good judge and is fair.
I am praying to God that everything I have heard about Judge Murray, comes to be true. I've heard that he is a fair and just judge ,also a God fearing man.we need more true and honest people such as judge Murray in our government offices.You go judge Murray and God bless you and yours.
Judge S Charles Murray already had his mind made up before he held my hearing. I wasdenied by this Judge. Judge Murray is supposed to look at the evidence in my case and make a decision but instead, he acted as a doctor and a psychiatrist himself. I have 6 diagnosis from 2 psychiatrists, one being the states psychiatrist. I have severe PTSD, anxiety, severe panic attacks, depression, ocd and dissociation. This judge wasn't fair at all and kept cutting me off when i spoke about my problems. I didn't like how he smurked his lips up either. I've lost numerous jobs because of my problems. I have many issues daily as well but this judge said he believes I'm making all of this up. I sure wish that Murray could stay here with me for a few days to see for himself. If he did, he would immediately change his verdict and attitude. I don't appreciate the unfairness of this judege nor do i appreciate his attitude. Murray gets 1 star from me because a half of a star option isn't available.
CHARLES MURRAY WAS VERY UNFAIR IN MY CASE. HE WOULD ASK ME A QUESTION AND THEN CUT ME OFF. MURRAY HAD A HORRIBLE ATTITUDE TOWARDS ME AND SMIRKED HIS LIPS UP AS IF HE KNOWS EVERYTHING! I HAVE ALL OF THE EVIDENCE NEEDED THAT SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN ME APPROVED FOR DISABILITY BUT MURRAY DIDN'T GO BY THE EVIDENCE. MURRAY MADE HIS "UNFAVORABLE DECISION" FROM HIS PATHETIC ATTITUDE. I WOULDN'T GIVE MURRAY 1 STAR BECAUSE HE DOESN'T DESERVE IT. A HORRIBLE JUDGE, A HORRIBLE PERSON AND I KNOW WHAT HE DID TO ME WAS WRONG, GOD KNOWS AS WELL. MURRAY SAW ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AND STILL DENIED ME. I'VE TALKED WITH SEVERAL ATTORNEYS AND THEY EACH SAID THAT MURRAY WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE HIS DECISION BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND THAT MURRAY CLEARLY WAS UNPROFESSIONAL, ABUSED HIS POWER AND SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO BE A JUDGE SINCE HE IS LETTING HIS PATHETIC ATTITUDE MAKE HIS DECISIONS FOR HIM INSTEAD OF BEING PROFESSIONAL AND JUDGING PEOPLE BY THE EVIDENCE. I TOTALLY AGREED WITH THE ATTORNEYS. BEWARE OF CHARLES MURRAY EVERYONE AND JUST KNOW THAT IF HE SMIRKS UP HIS LIPS OR RUDELY CUTS YOU OFF, YOU'RE DENIED! I HAVE SEVERE PTSD, SEVERE PANIC DISORDER, ANXIETY DISORDER, OCD, SEVERE DEPRESSION AND DISSOCIATION. ALSO, DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE AND AN L5 SLIPPED DISC. EVEN THE STATES PSYCHIATRIST DIAGNOSED ME WITH ALL OF THESE DIAGNOSES BUT NASTY MURRAY ABUSED HIS POWER AND POSITION TO REJECT ME FROM ASSISTANCE FROM THE STATE. I HOPE AND PRAY THAT MURRAY LOSES HIS JOB AND EVERYTHING HE OWNS!! I'VE LOST SEVERAL JOBS BECAUSE OF MY PROBLEMS AND I'VE LOST EVERYTHING I OWNED! MURRAY HAS HELPED DESTROY MY LIFE AND I HOPE THAT THIS HORRIBLE, SO CALLED JUDGE LOSES EVERYTHING HE OWNS!
I'm curious if any applicants, brought witnesses to your hearing? I have witnesses lined up on my behalf to bring when I get a hearing date.
No stars.... Judge Murray made his decision for my case which was UNFAVORABLE based on HIS observation. All the medical evidence was there , but just like the other two times I was denied before appealing it to a judge, Social Security puts their opinions and omits or adds information, along with his OBSERVATIONS so you are guaranteed to lose, whether or not if you have a lawyer, which I did. Alot of good it did if this Judge abuses his power and makes decisions based on OBSERVATIONS. One example in my decision was I looked well groomed , so with that OBSERVATION, that made it look like I was able to care for myself. Really? So be aware, go rip your clothes up, put dirt all over your face, your toes sticking out of your shoes, three canes and you have a much higher chance of approval because you don’t look groomed, based on HIS OBSERVATIONS!! There were other comments in my denial that are an observation based on what he saw at the hearing. I don’t put it past that these S.S clerks have pre-signed forms from these judges and twist and turn the info so you get screwed over and LOSE! If I could have continued to work , why would I have foreclosed on my house and filed bankruptcy! Because I couldn’t work!! I am not some bum trying to abuse the system. Now, I don’t know what I am going to do now. File the appeal? Another appeal? For what? So it goes to another person in the main S.S office to be denied, again. The system is very flawed... And the vocational “expert” ... there are some GREAT jobs out there that they say you can do and basically should have no problem finding and making a living off of. Ridiculous!! If that’s the case go tell me where the jobs are LOCALLY!! , not NATIONWIDE! I don’t care what amount of jobs are available NATIONWIDE if they aren’t available locally, and please tell me what they pay. No way you can make a living off the jobs THEY say are available and that THEY say you could do..But they are experts, what do i know.......
I don't think he is a fairly judge to the people who are actually disabled and have proof and to deny them in a world pandemic.
I don't think he is a fairly judge to the people who are actually disabled and have proof and to deny them in a world pandemic.
Judge William Ordas rendered a judgement against me with his written statement that included information contrary to accepted evidence in the case. I was very disappointment that he was not more accurate in what he posted.
Judge William Ordas did not carefully review the accepted evidence, or he chose to render judgment contrary to that evidence. Was he sloppy, or was he corrupt? Who knows?
Frighteningly poor.
Frighteningly poor.
Frighteningly poor.
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Obviously trying to be "THE" tough ALJ. "Trying" for sure.
Obviously trying to be "THE" tough ALJ. "Trying" for sure.
Obviously trying to be "THE" tough ALJ. "Trying" for sure.
Obviously trying to be "THE" tough ALJ. "Trying" for sure.
If you don't have representation, you don't stand a chance with Judge Palenske. She and the sytem work against those of us who cannot afford an attorney due to the length of time waiting to be heard. Beware!
If you don't have representation, you don't stand a chance with Judge Palenske. She and the sytem work against those of us who cannot afford an attorney due to the length of time waiting to be heard. Beware!
If you don't have representation, you don't stand a chance with Judge Palenske. She and the sytem work against those of us who cannot afford an attorney due to the length of time waiting to be heard. Beware!
If you don't have representation, you don't stand a chance with Judge Palenske. She and the sytem work against those of us who cannot afford an attorney due to the length of time waiting to be heard. Beware!
Space Cadet. Which Judge Palenske will show on a given day? On bad days, she has sworn in witnesses more than once. Asks very few questions in general. While I tend to share her conservative philosophy, she is not an easy judge.
Space Cadet. Which Judge Palenske will show on a given day? On bad days, she has sworn in witnesses more than once. Asks very few questions in general. While I tend to share her conservative philosophy, she is not an easy judge.
Space Cadet. Which Judge Palenske will show on a given day? On bad days, she has sworn in witnesses more than once. Asks very few questions in general. While I tend to share her conservative philosophy, she is not an easy judge.
Space Cadet. Which Judge Palenske will show on a given day? On bad days, she has sworn in witnesses more than once. Asks very few questions in general. While I tend to share her conservative philosophy, she is not an easy judge.
Her conservative personality should have nothing to do with how she decides claims. She is to appy the rule of law and to take a fresh look at each individual claim.
Her conservative personality should have nothing to do with how she decides claims. She is to appy the rule of law and to take a fresh look at each individual claim.
Her conservative personality should have nothing to do with how she decides claims. She is to appy the rule of law and to take a fresh look at each individual claim.
very few questions.Let the lawyer who knew very little about me ask the questions. not very happy.
very few questions.Let the lawyer who knew very little about me ask the questions. not very happy.
very few questions.Let the lawyer who knew very little about me ask the questions. not very happy.
Judge Palenske is horrendously unfair. She shot us down on a very solid case, but didn't just deny it. She sat on it for over six months before issuing the denial. Absolutely unacceptable.
Judge Palenske is horrendously unfair. She shot us down on a very solid case, but didn't just deny it. She sat on it for over six months before issuing the denial. Absolutely unacceptable.
Judge Palenske is horrendously unfair. She shot us down on a very solid case, but didn't just deny it. She sat on it for over six months before issuing the denial. Absolutely unacceptable.
She was fair. She dont like when you repeat whats in your file but overall great
She was fair. She dont like when you repeat whats in your file but overall great
She was fair. She dont like when you repeat whats in your file but overall great
She was very good the evidence spoke for its self! Fully favorable!
She was very good the evidence spoke for its self! Fully favorable!
She was very good the evidence spoke for its self! Fully favorable!
One of the worst judges in this office. Doesn't use vocational experts. Forgets to swear in witnesses. Sits on denials for months at a time. Will find the dumbest reasons to hold the record open in cases. For people that have waited years to have their cases heard, be prepared to wait even longer to hear back from her. Poor doesn't properly describe the job that she does. Taxpayers definitely deserve more.
She fabricates, cherry-picks, and manipulates evidence to conform to a predetermined decision. Does not know the meaning of "Judge" and does not deserve the title.
She made me feel very comfortable considering my health issues. I have a problem staying focused and communicating to people. I'm waiting for her decision and pray that it is favorable. This was written for me by Gwen Ward my wife.
Judge Palenske has been the recipient of some incredibly false and ridiculous critiques on this board. Firstly, her award rate is in line with the national average, which would itself indicate that she is applying the law faithfully and fairly. As a highly successful SSDI attorney, I have appeared before her many times. She rightly expects lawyers to fully and thoroughly present their cases. She listens more than she talks, and many of her colleagues on the Bench could learn from the thoughtful way in which she conducts her hearings. She is always respectful and courteous to each and every claimant, and always arrives at well reasoned legal conclusions regardless of whether the outcome is an award or a denial. If you have a good lawyer who follows Judge Palenske's specific pre-hearing instructions, and takes the time to carefully develop your testimony in court, this judge will award your case, provided that the medical evidence supports the severity of your allegations. By all standards of judicial fairness, temperament, and preparation, Judge Palenske is a model ALJ.
I just want to let the public know be very aware that these comments are not always true and anyone including the judges family, friends, and associates can make anonymous comments. I don't know this judge I just wanted to get this comment in.
An honorable, fair minded judge.
An honorable, fair minded judge.
An honorable, fair minded judge.
An honorable, fair minded judge.
This judge did in fact say clearly I am disabled in January 2014 but now its April of 2014 and I still have heard nothing about my case. I am getting worse in my conditions and now I am getting anxiety attacks from not being able to purchase basic everyday items. When I went in front of this judge he asked what he needed yo and kept switching around and said we will come back to that question and didn't. I really think I was forgotten about. All judges should have two weeks maximum to make a decision. If not be penalized for not doing so. Also when calling to get answers the lady who answers the phone don't even know the panel is!
This judge did in fact say clearly I am disabled in January 2014 but now its April of 2014 and I still have heard nothing about my case. I am getting worse in my conditions and now I am getting anxiety attacks from not being able to purchase basic everyday items. When I went in front of this judge he asked what he needed yo and kept switching around and said we will come back to that question and didn't. I really think I was forgotten about. All judges should have two weeks maximum to make a decision. If not be penalized for not doing so. Also when calling to get answers the lady who answers the phone don't even know the panel is!
This judge did in fact say clearly I am disabled in January 2014 but now its April of 2014 and I still have heard nothing about my case. I am getting worse in my conditions and now I am getting anxiety attacks from not being able to purchase basic everyday items. When I went in front of this judge he asked what he needed yo and kept switching around and said we will come back to that question and didn't. I really think I was forgotten about. All judges should have two weeks maximum to make a decision. If not be penalized for not doing so. Also when calling to get answers the lady who answers the phone don't even know the panel is!
This judge told me on July 16 2015 That I'm clearly disabled I just got my letter today after waiting 3 yrs that I'm denied. I can't walk with out my cane I have neurapty thru out my whole body all buldging & herniated disc how can some judge rate my pain unreal & unfair this system is sick
Everyone is nervous at the time of their hearing. Having Generalized Anxiety Disorder makes it that much worse. I feel the Judge took the time to listen to my Medical Conditions. It was much appreciated.
Judge Rodriguez seemed very fair. I haven't received my letter so I can't say anything about approval or denial but he definitely was thorough and clear and made me less nervous. My hearing was Dec. 13, 2017 and it is now only February so I should know the outcome in a month or so but either way I am glad I had him and how he treated me making my experience as pleasant as possible. I was very very nervous and he didn't judge and answered any questions I had not making me feel inferior. I was supposed to have Judge Weakley but got switched to Judge Rodriguez and from what I'm reading I am very grateful for that. He really was understanding and seemed fair.
A warm, wonderful, exceedingly wise Judge with a high pay rate.
A warm, wonderful, exceedingly wise Judge with a high pay rate.
A warm, wonderful, exceedingly wise Judge with a high pay rate.
A very intellectual judge who knows the law and reviews his cases on factual evidence. I hold the highest regard for the Honorable Judge Siegrist!
A very intellectual judge who knows the law and reviews his cases on factual evidence. I hold the highest regard for the Honorable Judge Siegrist!
A very intellectual judge who knows the law and reviews his cases on factual evidence. I hold the highest regard for the Honorable Judge Siegrist!
Very thorough and personable.
Very thorough and personable.
Very thorough and personable.
Very thorough and personable.
Very concerned with ones health and well-being.
Very concerned with ones health and well-being.
Very concerned with ones health and well-being.
I dont know Harry Siegrist,,,what I am aware of is that what was discussed during the hearing was ignored on my unfavorable decision. Nothing in me understands Is the system designed to leave some completely in the dark. My mind is so beyond normal worked over 2 dozen jobs in 13 years yet SSA states my impairments are not severe enough, wow. They have found me disabled but they claim its not total disable its only partially disable,,,What part is that? Diagnosed with Major Depressive disorder and other disorders as well but,,they say Im invested in being sick how does someone do that. 2 years Ive been getting federally funded as well as federally funded run around. I take prozac and trazdone Do people have a clue what I take them for. This has been my experience Take your meds and good luck,,wow some country we live in Aint no help or hope for folks like myself,,Im doomed. Jeff Spence Atlanta Ga. God bless humanity
I dont know Harry Siegrist,,,what I am aware of is that what was discussed during the hearing was ignored on my unfavorable decision. Nothing in me understands Is the system designed to leave some completely in the dark. My mind is so beyond normal worked over 2 dozen jobs in 13 years yet SSA states my impairments are not severe enough, wow. They have found me disabled but they claim its not total disable its only partially disable,,,What part is that? Diagnosed with Major Depressive disorder and other disorders as well but,,they say Im invested in being sick how does someone do that. 2 years Ive been getting federally funded as well as federally funded run around. I take prozac and trazdone Do people have a clue what I take them for. This has been my experience Take your meds and good luck,,wow some country we live in Aint no help or hope for folks like myself,,Im doomed. Jeff Spence Atlanta Ga. God bless humanity
I dont know Harry Siegrist,,,what I am aware of is that what was discussed during the hearing was ignored on my unfavorable decision. Nothing in me understands Is the system designed to leave some completely in the dark. My mind is so beyond normal worked over 2 dozen jobs in 13 years yet SSA states my impairments are not severe enough, wow. They have found me disabled but they claim its not total disable its only partially disable,,,What part is that? Diagnosed with Major Depressive disorder and other disorders as well but,,they say Im invested in being sick how does someone do that. 2 years Ive been getting federally funded as well as federally funded run around. I take prozac and trazdone Do people have a clue what I take them for. This has been my experience Take your meds and good luck,,wow some country we live in Aint no help or hope for folks like myself,,Im doomed. Jeff Spence Atlanta Ga. God bless humanity
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She took the time to listen to me and was very caring.
I would like to just say she is a fair and just judge she truly listen and provide fair decisions based on the evidence if more judges were this unbiased and did everything on a case by case basis and not under any preconceived stereotype this world would be a better place
The disability rules, law, I should of got my disability, but this judge denied me my disability. I am a very sick person, there is days I can barely walk, I honestly don't know if I am going to make it some days.. I have so much pain , so forgetful, the social security doctor said I was disable to work, because of my disease. She mention of me being obesity, and lack of education. It never stopped me working before. I have worked ever since I was 12 years old, worked hard for over 40 years. I have worked for everything I have, and now I am not able to work and about to lose everything I have ever worked for, because I am not able to work, and this Judge made this unfair and inhumane decision, on behalf I felt she is a prejudge Person. It is such a shame that a judge can make this kind of decision, because they don't like a person. What has our country become to. So sad that's it's become that such cases are treated like this. God be with us all.
Judge Uren is tough, and I have to appeal her decisions regularly, for she is far too willing to elevate State Agency doctor opinions above the opinions given by primary treating docs. On the positive side, however, Judge Uren is courteous and patient, and will afford your claimant all the time needed to present the entire case. She is thorough in her questioning as well. I rate her at four stars because she is professional and a delight to deal with. She'd get five if she would pay out claims at a slightly better rate!
Judge Uren is tough, and I have to appeal her decisions regularly, for she is far too willing to elevate State Agency doctor opinions above the opinions given by primary treating docs. On the positive side, however, Judge Uren is courteous and patient, and will afford your claimant all the time needed to present the entire case. She is thorough in her questioning as well. I rate her at four stars because she is professional and a delight to deal with. She'd get five if she would pay out claims at a slightly better rate!
Judge Uren is tough, and I have to appeal her decisions regularly, for she is far too willing to elevate State Agency doctor opinions above the opinions given by primary treating docs. On the positive side, however, Judge Uren is courteous and patient, and will afford your claimant all the time needed to present the entire case. She is thorough in her questioning as well. I rate her at four stars because she is professional and a delight to deal with. She'd get five if she would pay out claims at a slightly better rate!
Judge Uren is tough, and I have to appeal her decisions regularly, for she is far too willing to elevate State Agency doctor opinions above the opinions given by primary treating docs. On the positive side, however, Judge Uren is courteous and patient, and will afford your claimant all the time needed to present the entire case. She is thorough in her questioning as well. I rate her at four stars because she is professional and a delight to deal with. She'd get five if she would pay out claims at a slightly better rate!
Utterly unreasonable. Don't be fooled by a pleasant working demeanor. Your claim will be denied unless you are rolled into the hearing room on a stretcher. She will pull any small thing out of the record and weave it into a reason to deny a claim. As evidence of her toughness, her pay rate has declined from around 50/50 to 37%. Well qualified individuals are being denied by ALJ Uren. Plan on appealing her decision, every time.
Utterly unreasonable. Don't be fooled by a pleasant working demeanor. Your claim will be denied unless you are rolled into the hearing room on a stretcher. She will pull any small thing out of the record and weave it into a reason to deny a claim. As evidence of her toughness, her pay rate has declined from around 50/50 to 37%. Well qualified individuals are being denied by ALJ Uren. Plan on appealing her decision, every time.
Utterly unreasonable. Don't be fooled by a pleasant working demeanor. Your claim will be denied unless you are rolled into the hearing room on a stretcher. She will pull any small thing out of the record and weave it into a reason to deny a claim. As evidence of her toughness, her pay rate has declined from around 50/50 to 37%. Well qualified individuals are being denied by ALJ Uren. Plan on appealing her decision, every time.
Well, I haven't recieved my decision yet, but I pray that God leads her to rule the right way! Thanks for the information, but I will stay prayed up!!!!
Well, I haven't recieved my decision yet, but I pray that God leads her to rule the right way! Thanks for the information, but I will stay prayed up!!!!
Well, I haven't recieved my decision yet, but I pray that God leads her to rule the right way! Thanks for the information, but I will stay prayed up!!!!
Well, I haven't recieved my decision yet, but I pray that God leads her to rule the right way! Thanks for the information, but I will stay prayed up!!!!
I was pleasantly surprised by her care and concern for my client. She was knowledgeable and familiar with the record. She was courteous to myself and my client.
I was pleasantly surprised by her care and concern for my client. She was knowledgeable and familiar with the record. She was courteous to myself and my client.
I was pleasantly surprised by her care and concern for my client. She was knowledgeable and familiar with the record. She was courteous to myself and my client.
She is a pleasant person but I am still waiting on a decision nearly 90 days after my hearing.
Judge Uren was a pleasant professional person. She listened to my claimaints clearly and attentively. I was not represented because my attorney withdrew months before the hearing so I represented myself to the best of my ability. Unfortunately I was denied again. In 2013 I had a microdiskectomy and a year later my condition worsened. This year in March I had a Lumbar Fusion with steel rods and screws now in my back. Before the surgery I had to do therapy for my neck also because I was and still is experiencing severe arms pain including numbness all the way down in my fingers. I failed therapy because it did not help. After the Fusion I had minor pain with my neck and arms but for the past three months the pain has returned. My back has began to hurt more middle and lower and pain generating down right leg severely. I cant sleep well stand or sit long or wallk long without hurting. My daily activity is limited completely. I am currently waiting for another hearing because I appealed Judge Urens decision. I pray for better results this time around because I have been denied four times. My occupation was a Certified Nursing Assistant of seventeen years. I am not able to work anymore and pray for a decision in my favor this time.
I don't recommend her
Esta Jueza es ********** y se ensaña en contra de las Personas y Pacientes incapacitados física y mentalmente, discriminando sin importar la enfermedad terminal que esté padeciendo. No debería estar ocupando ese puesto y tengan consideración de reconocer la necesidad de una real Jueza que Aplique la Ley realmente.
She is very unfair,and makes her on mind up without even considering the medical information.
Very unfair and completely overturned a fully favorable by illegally disregarding 4 of my doctors diagnosis. Now my condition is worse and still waiting for appeals. Has zero regard for anyones health.
Dishonest, Lying, Corrupt, vicious, unfair, federaly appointed judge that treated my case with NO concerns except her own. Weaver dismissed reports from all doctors and testimony from myself and witnesses that spoke on my behalf. She is nothing more than a federally appointed bully... Before my case was dismissed by Weaver and SSD I was diagnosed with "Occipital Neuralgia" by the VA with a 90% disability rating and approved for full disability by the military. Those records were submitted to Weaver and the SSD Appeals Council and Weaver and SSD refused to consider or review my New evidence in my case and closed my case forever. SHAME ON YOU Cynthia G. Weaver!!!
Judge Cynthia G Weaver received my request for off the record, she had all of my information medical, my backup proof of things I disputed, and all my work credits were correct. She paid no attention to a previous judge, didn't care about real evidence and what my many illnesses have done to me and my life. She couldn't have had my file for over 1/2 day and probably didn't read it because within the next day my online social security account said medical decision made(I thought it was in my favor), but two days later it said claim denied(ssdi) and case closed. She ignored my request to keep my hearing as scheduled and if she could not return a favorable decision it would go on. She closed it, and now I have nothing to show for all the credits I have earned. Can't get anything now because my credits have expired for this time frame. I am not sure how she gets away with being so unfair, but the comments left by everyone else about her show the same thing. Maybe she needs to be looked at., her approval rating is the lowest of any ODAR Judge-16%. You have officially ruin my life Judge Weaver
Well I'm worried to death now Covid 19 case Sept 2020
Well I'm worried to death now Covid 19 case Sept 2020
i hate weaver she has denied me so many times i have paid in till i get hurt when i drove wreckers and got hit by a drunk driver and got a steel cage in my neck ,2 knee surgerys,heart problems ,lower back problems from the drunk driver and now i have liver damage due to the pain meds for many years due to pain and surgerys and that bitch wants to keep denied me oh and now fibromyalgia and has dr that say i cant work but i cant draw what ive paid in .i keep getting told they dont give it to people under 50 that bull shit she can kiss my ass that stupid bitch and on top of that put me down in court about she started asking me how i have sex and i said on my back lol but that bitch can go to fucken hell
i hate weaver she has denied me so many times i have paid in till i get hurt when i drove wreckers and got hit by a drunk driver and got a steel cage in my neck ,2 knee surgerys,heart problems ,lower back problems from the drunk driver and now i have liver damage due to the pain meds for many years due to pain and surgerys and that bitch wants to keep denied me oh and now fibromyalgia and has dr that say i cant work but i cant draw what ive paid in .i keep getting told they dont give it to people under 50 that bull shit she can kiss my ass that stupid bitch and on top of that put me down in court about she started asking me how i have sex and i said on my back lol but that bitch can go to fucken hell
i hate weaver she has denied me so many times i have paid in till i get hurt when i drove wreckers and got hit by a drunk driver and got a steel cage in my neck ,2 knee surgerys,heart problems ,lower back problems from the drunk driver and now i have liver damage due to the pain meds for many years due to pain and surgerys and that bitch wants to keep denied me oh and now fibromyalgia and has dr that say i cant work but i cant draw what ive paid in .i keep getting told they dont give it to people under 50 that bull shit she can kiss my ass that stupid bitch and on top of that put me down in court about she started asking me how i have sex and i said on my back lol but that bitch can go to fucken hell
i hate weaver she has denied me so many times i have paid in till i get hurt when i drove wreckers and got hit by a drunk driver and got a steel cage in my neck ,2 knee surgerys,heart problems ,lower back problems from the drunk driver and now i have liver damage due to the pain meds for many years due to pain and surgerys and that bitch wants to keep denied me oh and now fibromyalgia and has dr that say i cant work but i cant draw what ive paid in .i keep getting told they dont give it to people under 50 that bull shit she can kiss my ass that stupid bitch and on top of that put me down in court about she started asking me how i have sex and i said on my back lol but that bitch can go to fucken hell
i hate weaver she has denied me so many times i have paid in till i get hurt when i drove wreckers and got hit by a drunk driver and got a steel cage in my neck ,2 knee surgerys,heart problems ,lower back problems from the drunk driver and now i have liver damage due to the pain meds for many years due to pain and surgerys and that bitch wants to keep denied me oh and now fibromyalgia and has dr that say i cant work but i cant draw what ive paid in .i keep getting told they dont give it to people under 50 that bull shit she can kiss my ass that stupid bitch and on top of that put me down in court about she started asking me how i have sex and i said on my back lol but that bitch can go to fucken hell i hope like hell someone does her or her family the same way