BOSTON, Massachusetts Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Boston, MASSACHUSETTS, 20 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Boston, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 10 months. The average case processing time in Boston is 373 days. The Boston average for winning a SSI or SSD disability hearing is 45%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Boston ODAR office was last updated on 10/01/2021.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOSTON | 20 | 10.0 months | 373 days | 1.9 | 20% | 45% | 35% |
| MASSACHUSETTS | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| months | days | % | % |
LIST OF JUDGES / 33
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sean Teehan | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Carol A Sax | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Rebekah Ross | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| William T Ross | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sujata Rodgers | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Martha R Reeves | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| William Ramsey | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| James H Packer | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Connor O'Brien | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Francis C Newton | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Paul M Murphy | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Aaron M Morgan | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John F Markuns | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| J. Alan Mackay | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Matthew Levin | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Matthew G Levin | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Alexander Klibaner | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Robert J Kelly | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| James Kearns | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Francis Hurley | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Henry J Hogan | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Paul W Goodale | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Joel F Gardiner | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Stephen C Fulton | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Thomas H Fallon | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Eric Eklund | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Daniel J Driscoll | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Margaret A Donaghy | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Paul S Carter | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Constance D Carter | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Noran J Camp | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Barry H Best | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Maria Alexander Nunez | 0% | 0% | 0% |
137 Comments
You can always tell an expert! Thanks for contritbuing.
You can always tell an expert! Thanks for contritbuing.
You can always tell an expert! Thanks for contritbuing.
As Chief ALJ of Richmond, she has a moral and ethical responsibility to set the srandard according to the law. Claimants should NEVER be treated with bisa and personal prejudices. Her comments were racist and offensive to me. Her approval rate in Puerto Rico was a whopping 79%! In Boston 100%, and now in Richmond 32%! What does the last name Nunez have in common with PR?She needs to be investigated! With the recent class action lawsuit settlement in response the anti-claimant crew in Queens New York, can anybody say "Class Action Lawsuit against ssa anti-claimant ALJS in Richmond ODAR office?" Its time to shut anti-claimant judges like Nunez down! Is it possible to sue the SSA for emotional distress, pain and suffering caused by anti-claimant judges who deny legitimate claims?
I had my hearing with Judge Nunez today 12/15/2017 and I hope everything goes well! I am a nervous wreck. I have not stop thinking about my hearing. I have waited 2 years and I hope she rules in my favor. She was very nice and professional. I answered all her question just was very nervous
Judge Nunez failed to issue Subpoenas for my Medical Records. 4 August 2017 Hearing was a joke. I withdrew on the record pointing out her errors. She is rude, disorganized and inept. Her Fault, I did not get the Award. She became abusive and later dismissed my case. I am 100% Disabled and have been so since 1993. My most recent appeal via Fax to the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review was denied by letter on 14 February 2018 with a Form Letter. Served my Nation for over 20 years in Various Capacities, and where I was disabled plus !
Went to my hearing and He stated He wanted to do a continuance to have a DR present to review the medical documents. I am not sure what this means but He appeared to be nice. Started crying a bit when talking about my problems and He did not try to rush me. Took a few breaths then continued. He was not rude to me at all. Even when I did not understand the question and spoke of something completly different. Seemed to show sympathy and not rush me, unlike the hersay of most Judges doing this when someone becomes upset or emotional.
Went to my hearing and He stated He wanted to do a continuance to have a DR present to review the medical documents. I am not sure what this means but He appeared to be nice. Started crying a bit when talking about my problems and He did not try to rush me. Took a few breaths then continued. He was not rude to me at all. Even when I did not understand the question and spoke of something completly different. Seemed to show sympathy and not rush me, unlike the hersay of most Judges doing this when someone becomes upset or emotional.
Went to my hearing and He stated He wanted to do a continuance to have a DR present to review the medical documents. I am not sure what this means but He appeared to be nice. Started crying a bit when talking about my problems and He did not try to rush me. Took a few breaths then continued. He was not rude to me at all. Even when I did not understand the question and spoke of something completly different. Seemed to show sympathy and not rush me, unlike the hersay of most Judges doing this when someone becomes upset or emotional.
Just received a denial letter from judge Best. I feel as though he ignored all the strong evidence presented by my self and my doctors and based his decision solely on the SSA doctors who saw me. A typical denier judge!
Just received a denial letter from judge Best. I feel as though he ignored all the strong evidence presented by my self and my doctors and based his decision solely on the SSA doctors who saw me. A typical denier judge!
Just received a denial letter from judge Best. I feel as though he ignored all the strong evidence presented by my self and my doctors and based his decision solely on the SSA doctors who saw me. A typical denier judge!
I have been suffering from severe mental health illness since I was in high school. It has disrupted my employment and caused me to lose careers as well as my home. I have been on medication and in therapy for 22 years. My attorney provided a brief and the judge also received a letter from my psychiatrist explaining the severity of my illnesses and how the destructive symptoms keep me from gainful employment. I'm upset that even when the SSDI criteria is met and backed up with evidence, the judge can still flip a coin on how he wants to handle the decision. I am disgusted with this process, it is unfair and discriminates against mental health illness. Judge Best failed and I find it peculiar he is one of the higest unfavorable decision judges in Rhode Island. Shame on this entire process.
Judge C.Carter has a low approval rating. It is not the lowest but it is low in comparison to others. I found her to be objective and probing. I found her to be receptive to accurate honesty. I had to settle for a later on-set date but I fault primary care for that.
Judge C.Carter has a low approval rating. It is not the lowest but it is low in comparison to others. I found her to be objective and probing. I found her to be receptive to accurate honesty. I had to settle for a later on-set date but I fault primary care for that.
Judge C.Carter has a low approval rating. It is not the lowest but it is low in comparison to others. I found her to be objective and probing. I found her to be receptive to accurate honesty. I had to settle for a later on-set date but I fault primary care for that.
I believe Judge Carter is the meanest woman I've had the displeasure to meet. She totally disregards evidence and formed an opinion before the hearing. I believe that medical professionals should be making decisions. She is delusional and made up information in my final report. I knew it would be bad when the person in front of me came out cursing. He was disabled but she does not feel that benefits are justified. Dissatisfied
If you get this judge for your disability, my advice is to change it somehow. She denied me disability when I was assaulted by a cab driver. I am half blind and can’t obtain a drivers license. I also have mental health issues from my brain injury. She threw out all evidence supporting my claim. I served my country four years with honor. The stress that I have endured because of this lady should be a crime. I would sue her, but you can’t sue ssa judges. She is a horrible human being. Please stay clear and good luck.
I love Judge Constance Carter!!! She took the time and listened to my lawyer and I. If I didn't understand something, she explained it to me. She approved me for full benefits. God bless her. I really would advise people to always pray and have faith!!
She hated me from the time she laid eyes on me..Didnt go by there. Own social security. Dr..She needs to look at by congress. .I also was remaned by appeals council. .she still Denied. Me Didnt follow Appeals. Council. Instructions. If i was a different. Race i would have been approved. All medical. Records text book ssa qualifications. ..If congress. Read this she. Needs to be impeached
I would rather be in prison than let him just steal from me my wife has to work 2 job to support us I will get my justice
Judge Carter is a man full of wisdom and fair in his judgment. Thank you, your Honor, God bless you!
Judge Driscoll was thorough in his questioning and what I believe is apparent fairness as described by my husband. We are not sure it was approved yet and we will wait for his decision. My husband was very confused about himself yet the judge allowed my husband to try and compose himself many times during the hearing. No matter how the decision turns out my husband said the man was doing his job the best he can do. Our attorney said he believed the case was approved. We can only wait to find out if it actually was. God bless these judges that have to make these very difficult decisions regardless of how they rule.
Judge Driscoll was thorough in his questioning and what I believe is apparent fairness as described by my husband. We are not sure it was approved yet and we will wait for his decision. My husband was very confused about himself yet the judge allowed my husband to try and compose himself many times during the hearing. No matter how the decision turns out my husband said the man was doing his job the best he can do. Our attorney said he believed the case was approved. We can only wait to find out if it actually was. God bless these judges that have to make these very difficult decisions regardless of how they rule.
Judge Driscoll was thorough in his questioning and what I believe is apparent fairness as described by my husband. We are not sure it was approved yet and we will wait for his decision. My husband was very confused about himself yet the judge allowed my husband to try and compose himself many times during the hearing. No matter how the decision turns out my husband said the man was doing his job the best he can do. Our attorney said he believed the case was approved. We can only wait to find out if it actually was. God bless these judges that have to make these very difficult decisions regardless of how they rule.
Judge Driscoll was thorough in his questioning and what I believe is apparent fairness as described by my husband. We are not sure it was approved yet and we will wait for his decision. My husband was very confused about himself yet the judge allowed my husband to try and compose himself many times during the hearing. No matter how the decision turns out my husband said the man was doing his job the best he can do. Our attorney said he believed the case was approved. We can only wait to find out if it actually was. God bless these judges that have to make these very difficult decisions regardless of how they rule.
I didn't have an attorney and being homeless I was nervous about my day in court for sure. However going before judge Driscoll made my nerves go away that day. He was polite and respectful. A true professional.
I found Judge Driscoll to be Fair, Respectful, Open-Minded & Engaging.
Judge Driscoll was very thorough, involved and extensive with his questions over our telephone hearing and was kind enough to allow me to calm down as i was flustered during the call. I know not my results yet, but i really appreciate how neutral and open he was. my anxiety was horrible but his neutrality and understanding while i was distressed was very kind.
Judge Driscoll was very thorough, involved and extensive with his questions over our telephone hearing and was kind enough to allow me to calm down as i was flustered during the call. I know not my results yet, but i really appreciate how neutral and open he was. my anxiety was horrible but his neutrality and understanding while i was distressed was very kind.
It has been 6 years and 5 months since I filed for disability based on depression/anxiety/COPD. Judge Eklund was the person in charge of my hearing and decisions. To say I am disappointed in his interpretation of my case would be remiss. I'm still shocked that it took 3/4 of a decade to conclude and my only takeaway is that I am naïve in thinking the system fair. I knew I also took the risk of increasing my anxiety in the long haul and that has occurred swiftly. A remand to the VA. panel gave me hope because those occur in smaller percentages. Judge Eklund in court struck me as pleasant, thorough, and engaged in the process. In writing of the denial reports the first one included several incorrections that gave the connotation to actual issues. As example, the expert psychiatric witness report on my evaluation said I was of normal demeanor in person and omitted the breaking into tears portion when I was at a loss of words becoming emotional. The retention of short term memory was overlooked which is a credible hallmark of the anxiety at work in a learning or stress situation. The huge omission in the 2nd remand hearing was the complete disregard to my counselor of 5 years reporting the negative impact of employment stress. Yet high consideration was given to that 1 hour state psychiatrist shown above who misconstrued my demeanor as witnessed by my accompanying companion. This was followed by the conclusion of the hearing that I found very optimistic from the vocational expert. She stated in response to query that the small sector of jobs left when omitting physical demanding and environmental factored jobs that were options for me would not be stress free as recommended. The Judge did not include this experts opinion in the finding which was positive toward my case. He did not however factor into the last year where the Adminstration in VA. actually did not know I even appealed his findings.
Today is a “clear” day to write this. As baffled as I was regarding the questions Judge Eric Eklund asked during the hearing at times, I felt comfortable giving him my truthful answers and that they would be received that way. The process because of volume can become rote and assumptive and foster skepticism. We all hope that doesn’t apply to our case. Unknown to me at the time of the hearing but shortly thereafter, the records used for review and basis of the questions were incorrect. I had been counseled not to ask any questions or provide comment or clarification. Mistakes are made, it’s human. I can only judge my decisions. I realized that misunderstandings, misinformation that cascade and go unquestioned or are not clarified are aids in expediency for all but the claimant. Working for over 4 decades, gaining 6 figure salary, saving and having no debt, activities and ongoing learning and are rendered useless against a tick bite. I realized that being proactive and seeking treatment to understand and counteract the abrupt ending of one’s lifestyle are moot points. I learned that activities that are carried from record to record as the “baselines from onset of chronic lyme symptoms” that they really are versus the assumption taken of actual current activities, until the error is discovered by claimant after the hearing and are subsequently corrected and clarified by doctors are missed or not weighted. That 21 plus years employed in a field that necessitated 24 x 7 coverage and daily attendance is said to be able to be performed now even though the medical records and adult function reports consistently indicate the inability to know day to day if one is capable of functioning. Functioning at 40% a few days a week is interpreted as the ability to perform past prior work. That attempting to find or create some kind of work on the “good” days that will fit with the day to day abilities and disability, to spend savings and retirement to support oneself, looking for a cure for chronic lyme and fibromyalgia rather than drugs so that the claimant can as they really wish to, return to full time work and past activity level rather being disabled and doped are detriments not assets. That not knowing exact retirement age via SSA is perfectly understandable to those who want to “retire” only when they are dead but becomes astounding to others. That having a member of the court who has known the claimant for decades and spoke to the drastic change since the tick bites in claimant is not weighted or regarded. This claimant did not wish, plan or hope to be disabled by multiple tick bites. This claimant had a lot of plans for the future that will not be realized. This claimant worked and saved rather than spend. This claimant paid taxes and insurance for over 4 decades and is being denied benefits. Since this is a “good” day, I am clear in being completely baffled and disappointed and depressed over the decision. I’m human. Everyone makes mistakes. My mistake was trust in truth. My peace is integrity.
A kangaroo court
A kangaroo court
A kangaroo court
Well I want to start how scared I was just the unknown. In my heart I knew the evidence would speak for me. I can't fake congested heart failure. Depression and anxiety. It's a real as it comes. Judge Fulton was very understanding and listened to me and I thank him for that. I was very honest I held back nothing. Remember to always tell the truth.
I went before this judge in summer of 2013, as I enter the courtroom I got a very weird look from this judge,when I stated my age 48 he became very negative. now I have had a few injuries including 2 disc herniations in my lower back 2 disks in my neck which now I have no feeling in my r foot along with sciatic nerve issues running from my back down to my leg into my foot. ive been to 3 doctors in the boston spine groupe. few years later I had a heart attak and a stent operation was done,, then I tore my rot cuff and no longer have strength in my right arm or hand. ive been to several doctors for these conditions and I am on medication. long story short this judge did not review all my doctors and the ones he did he twisted the stories around and .he said because of my age I am still able to work,one example of his explanation,, he is not to lift anything over 5 lbs push pull grasp and no working above shoulder height,, he has also spine impingement nerve damage etc etc.. then goes on to tell me im only in my 40s and to him I don't look like im in any pain,, then has a vocational expert telling him I can go back to work doing automotive work,, and according to 2010 stats there are thousands of positions available,, ahh hello this is 2013 and I cannot bend stretch push pull or grasp,, to me this judge was full of personal attacks due my age,, very negative and very unfair,, when I got my unfavorable decision he had twisted the explanations around did not look at all my doctors records that say not able to work due to conditions.. imo this judge should be fired. I did not ask for these injuries this was the deck I was handed and now have to deal with them for the rest of my life,, thanks judge for being so negative and full of personal attacks because of my age..so now I am no longer insured and cannot collect the money I had paid in to ss. so what do they do with all the money people pay in and cannot collect??? I honestly don't know how this narrow minded judge can sleep at night. and yes this is called freedom of speech,, or did they take my rights away too..
I went before this judge in summer of 2013, as I enter the courtroom I got a very weird look from this judge,when I stated my age 48 he became very negative. now I have had a few injuries including 2 disc herniations in my lower back 2 disks in my neck which now I have no feeling in my r foot along with sciatic nerve issues running from my back down to my leg into my foot. ive been to 3 doctors in the boston spine groupe. few years later I had a heart attak and a stent operation was done,, then I tore my rot cuff and no longer have strength in my right arm or hand. ive been to several doctors for these conditions and I am on medication. long story short this judge did not review all my doctors and the ones he did he twisted the stories around and .he said because of my age I am still able to work,one example of his explanation,, he is not to lift anything over 5 lbs push pull grasp and no working above shoulder height,, he has also spine impingement nerve damage etc etc.. then goes on to tell me im only in my 40s and to him I don't look like im in any pain,, then has a vocational expert telling him I can go back to work doing automotive work,, and according to 2010 stats there are thousands of positions available,, ahh hello this is 2013 and I cannot bend stretch push pull or grasp,, to me this judge was full of personal attacks due my age,, very negative and very unfair,, when I got my unfavorable decision he had twisted the explanations around did not look at all my doctors records that say not able to work due to conditions.. imo this judge should be fired. I did not ask for these injuries this was the deck I was handed and now have to deal with them for the rest of my life,, thanks judge for being so negative and full of personal attacks because of my age..so now I am no longer insured and cannot collect the money I had paid in to ss. so what do they do with all the money people pay in and cannot collect??? I honestly don't know how this narrow minded judge can sleep at night. and yes this is called freedom of speech,, or did they take my rights away too..
I went before this judge in summer of 2013, as I enter the courtroom I got a very weird look from this judge,when I stated my age 48 he became very negative. now I have had a few injuries including 2 disc herniations in my lower back 2 disks in my neck which now I have no feeling in my r foot along with sciatic nerve issues running from my back down to my leg into my foot. ive been to 3 doctors in the boston spine groupe. few years later I had a heart attak and a stent operation was done,, then I tore my rot cuff and no longer have strength in my right arm or hand. ive been to several doctors for these conditions and I am on medication. long story short this judge did not review all my doctors and the ones he did he twisted the stories around and .he said because of my age I am still able to work,one example of his explanation,, he is not to lift anything over 5 lbs push pull grasp and no working above shoulder height,, he has also spine impingement nerve damage etc etc.. then goes on to tell me im only in my 40s and to him I don't look like im in any pain,, then has a vocational expert telling him I can go back to work doing automotive work,, and according to 2010 stats there are thousands of positions available,, ahh hello this is 2013 and I cannot bend stretch push pull or grasp,, to me this judge was full of personal attacks due my age,, very negative and very unfair,, when I got my unfavorable decision he had twisted the explanations around did not look at all my doctors records that say not able to work due to conditions.. imo this judge should be fired. I did not ask for these injuries this was the deck I was handed and now have to deal with them for the rest of my life,, thanks judge for being so negative and full of personal attacks because of my age..so now I am no longer insured and cannot collect the money I had paid in to ss. so what do they do with all the money people pay in and cannot collect??? I honestly don't know how this narrow minded judge can sleep at night. and yes this is called freedom of speech,, or did they take my rights away too..
I am trying to get in touch with Judge Gardiner. In 1996 he helped my husband Michael Cunningham from Lawrence MA get SSI. Now after all this time SS is saying that they overpaid Michael $200,000 and demanding that I repay them. Michael was also receiving workmens compensation from the post office he worked. He received these monies until December 2017 when he passed away. I need help, please help me I don't have the money to repay them.
I've had debilitating major depression disorder for many years, I was told at my hearing nov 2015 I would have a answer by 30 to 60 days. I explained I'm homeless, have been searching for a couch almost every night. I am clean and sober for 3 and a half years and have still been optimistic that the judge would understand under such dress I am grateful for my clean time, and proud. He did make a comment that "the state doesn't reward drug addiction" I again agreed that was fine and again, said I was clean and sober. It's very easy to right off a CLEAN addict.. I thought the comment was continued to answer all the answers In a truthful manner, I thought I was well put together for no representation. I am still couch hoping and just had a hysterectomy, I am currently recouping at my abusive xhusband, and have major depression and anxiety all day,do the want to upset him. Sat night I said something and was Pushed and screamed at while his spit hit my face, his fingernail cut into my cheek. He proceeded to scream I am a ĺooser, who doesn't want to work. Told me to "get the expletives out" I moved the few things from the house ripping my stitches, and was told to stop being dramatic. This is just a sample of what I've had to endure waiting for a judge to set me free from this hell..as of today, I was denied after explaining my once a week inquiry, that I had to explain again, my dire situation, and my depression was at its worst and really needed a reply..finally 4 mo later, today was told I'm denied. I would never wish anyone the personal hell of panic attacos at any moment,and the depression that keeps me up for days and non able to work. I don't know what is next. I'm feeling hopeless and wish I had a judge that cares about people. I wish I was not around to feel the latest hit..thank you for not having a pulse to the sickness of major depressive disorder. I'm beyond crushed at my one light of help is written off as not his problem.
It took Judge Goodale eight months to render my decision. Even though I have two conditions on the disability list that should have been favorable (Lupus and Lumbar Stenosis)- Not to mention I applied when I had cervical stenosis which ended up in emergency surgery and over a year to recover. The surgery left with loss of mobility in my neck...nerve damage in my hands, feet, chest and neck. I have extreme trouble walking, standing and sitting. I worked my whole life and every weeks the system took money from my pay and sent me notices stating if I ever became disabled this money taken out of my pay - well this was the reason. They don't tell you how you have to fight for it- or they twist things to make it work in the state's favor. I am not any never have been addicted to drugs, I am just shy of 50 years old, I speak English and I have worked very hard to put myself through a few college classes....These things worked against me. What a twisted system. I am disappointed and disgusted by Judge Paul Goodale who failed a human being in need- One who has done nothing but the right things in life- Perhaps, if the judge spent one day in my shoes or was inside my head to know the despair... his decision would not be the injustice he served.
Had my hearing in march 2015 I want to post before my desion so this was my second time before him Very through new things wif e didnt now about me does his homework Im a wreck waiting for results but what Ic an tell you he is a strait shooter and a caring man and ill be ok because I told him how it is and he listened and seemed concerned about facts My thought is what ever happens I cant say anything negitive about this man advice be honest get what he asks for show respect and pray.
Respectable, fair, and genuinely concerned with my disabilities and struggles. I am embarrassed to be so broken down physically and mentally. I was respected and treated as I should be. Pray to god justice prevails.
This man has no compassion for public safety officials who served their state for 24 years.
Horrible. Takes everything negative and ignores the good. Seriously an idiot and doesn't know how to use spell check. I hate him
Horrible. Takes everything negative and ignores the good. Seriously an idiot and doesn't know how to use spell check. I hate him
Horrible. Takes everything negative and ignores the good. Seriously an idiot and doesn't know how to use spell check. I hate him
Horrible. Takes everything negative and ignores the good. Seriously an idiot and doesn't know how to use spell check. I hate him
Look at his approval rates year to year -- the ratios remain the same. Judge has an agenda to deny, period.
I thought he was very nice and professional. From the comments I thought I would be doomed just the opposite felt very comfortable with him.
This is an honest review as I have not received a decision. I think Judge Levin is nothing but fair I think he looks at all evidence good and bad and is nothing but professional. He was nothing but kind during the hearing and listened to everything. I don’t think he has any kind of agenda to deny everyone despite his approvals ratings. If you have a hearing with him don’t go in assuming he is going to deny you and be negative. Negativity shows be honest and truthful and you will be fine.
He is all intellect and no empathy. I had the bad luck to get this judge. One year I was so sick I saw 8 different doctors to try to get well. I was in no condition to work. He ruled my case unfavorably. It's sickening that judges make 100-200 thousand a year denying sick people a measly $800 a month. This is my humble opinion.
At this time it appears like Expression Engine is the top blogging platform available right now. (from what I've read) Is that what you are using on your blog?
At this time it appears like Expression Engine is the top blogging platform available right now. (from what I've read) Is that what you are using on your blog?
I have had judge Mackay on two cases, one I won which should never had made it to a law judge as the client was very Ill One I lost that although the Meds did not support the client I knew the client and her problems Personally as she became a friend of the family. I knew it was a long shot but I thought the judge would see she was really truthful and was in need Of these benefits. I think these judges have to realize that most of my brothers and sisters turn away many people we feel don't deserve SSDI but when we bring a client we put a lot of work into their cases and when we loose we suffer as we end up working for months for nothing and that Hurts we do not get a weekly check the cases we bring to you we believe in
I have had judge Mackay on two cases, one I won which should never had made it to a law judge as the client was very Ill One I lost that although the Meds did not support the client I knew the client and her problems Personally as she became a friend of the family. I knew it was a long shot but I thought the judge would see she was really truthful and was in need Of these benefits. I think these judges have to realize that most of my brothers and sisters turn away many people we feel don't deserve SSDI but when we bring a client we put a lot of work into their cases and when we loose we suffer as we end up working for months for nothing and that Hurts we do not get a weekly check the cases we bring to you we believe in
I have had judge Mackay on two cases, one I won which should never had made it to a law judge as the client was very Ill One I lost that although the Meds did not support the client I knew the client and her problems Personally as she became a friend of the family. I knew it was a long shot but I thought the judge would see she was really truthful and was in need Of these benefits. I think these judges have to realize that most of my brothers and sisters turn away many people we feel don't deserve SSDI but when we bring a client we put a lot of work into their cases and when we loose we suffer as we end up working for months for nothing and that Hurts we do not get a weekly check the cases we bring to you we believe in
I have had ALJ MacKay twice in the past month. He is a stickler on the 5 day rule and will not accept evidence submitted after the 5 days. Period. However, he awarded both cases, one 45 year old with chronic pain and one 54 year old whose past relevant was heavy and whose cardiac impairment limited him to sedentary/light work
I have had ALJ MacKay twice in the past month. He is a stickler on the 5 day rule and will not accept evidence submitted after the 5 days. Period. However, he awarded both cases, one 45 year old with chronic pain and one 54 year old whose past relevant was heavy and whose cardiac impairment limited him to sedentary/light work
I have had ALJ MacKay twice in the past month. He is a stickler on the 5 day rule and will not accept evidence submitted after the 5 days. Period. However, he awarded both cases, one 45 year old with chronic pain and one 54 year old whose past relevant was heavy and whose cardiac impairment limited him to sedentary/light work
HAD HIS DECISION MADE AGAINST ME BEFORE WE FINISHED HEARING, ARROGANT AND MAKES DECISION WITHOUT TWO YEARS OF MEDICAL SCREENING UP TO APPEARANCE BEFORE HIM, RATHER THAN REMANDING FOR FURTHER MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS WHERE CLAIMANTS HAVE NO MEDICAL INSURANCE OR FINANCIAL STABILITY TO SEE ANY MEDICAL DOCTORS AND REJECTS FAMILY PHYSICIAN REPORTS FROM DECADES OF BEING THE TREATING PHYSICIAN.
HAD HIS DECISION MADE AGAINST ME BEFORE WE FINISHED HEARING, ARROGANT AND MAKES DECISION WITHOUT TWO YEARS OF MEDICAL SCREENING UP TO APPEARANCE BEFORE HIM, RATHER THAN REMANDING FOR FURTHER MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS WHERE CLAIMANTS HAVE NO MEDICAL INSURANCE OR FINANCIAL STABILITY TO SEE ANY MEDICAL DOCTORS AND REJECTS FAMILY PHYSICIAN REPORTS FROM DECADES OF BEING THE TREATING PHYSICIAN.
HAD HIS DECISION MADE AGAINST ME BEFORE WE FINISHED HEARING, ARROGANT AND MAKES DECISION WITHOUT TWO YEARS OF MEDICAL SCREENING UP TO APPEARANCE BEFORE HIM, RATHER THAN REMANDING FOR FURTHER MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS WHERE CLAIMANTS HAVE NO MEDICAL INSURANCE OR FINANCIAL STABILITY TO SEE ANY MEDICAL DOCTORS AND REJECTS FAMILY PHYSICIAN REPORTS FROM DECADES OF BEING THE TREATING PHYSICIAN.
HAD HIS DECISION MADE AGAINST ME BEFORE WE FINISHED HEARING, ARROGANT AND MAKES DECISION WITHOUT TWO YEARS OF MEDICAL SCREENING UP TO APPEARANCE BEFORE HIM, RATHER THAN REMANDING FOR FURTHER MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS WHERE CLAIMANTS HAVE NO MEDICAL INSURANCE OR FINANCIAL STABILITY TO SEE ANY MEDICAL DOCTORS AND REJECTS FAMILY PHYSICIAN REPORTS FROM DECADES OF BEING THE TREATING PHYSICIAN.
Completely disregards the concept that the hearing is the claimant's opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing. Selects certain non-favorable evidence to base his decision on and disregards the remaining record. Attempts to embarrass reps and claimants. Should be reported to chief ALJ.
Completely disregards the concept that the hearing is the claimant's opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing. Selects certain non-favorable evidence to base his decision on and disregards the remaining record. Attempts to embarrass reps and claimants. Should be reported to chief ALJ.
Completely disregards the concept that the hearing is the claimant's opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing. Selects certain non-favorable evidence to base his decision on and disregards the remaining record. Attempts to embarrass reps and claimants. Should be reported to chief ALJ.
Completely disregards the concept that the hearing is the claimant's opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing. Selects certain non-favorable evidence to base his decision on and disregards the remaining record. Attempts to embarrass reps and claimants. Should be reported to chief ALJ.
Arrogant little bully!
Arrogant little bully!
Arrogant little bully!
Arrogant little bully!
Tough but fair.
Tough but fair.
Tough but fair.
Tough but fair.
I went before this judge and the only thing he could use against me was that I smoke cig's lmao. This judge didn't even open my records. He would not stop about smoking. This judge needs banned fromk the bench.
THIS JUDGE VERY NICE AND FAIR JUDGE l WENT 2 TIME IN COURT AND JUDGE DON'T MISS ANTHING HE LOOT ALL MY DR REPORT AND SECOND COURT HE TALL ME l WIN AND l JUST RECIVED MY DECICION LETTER YESTERDAY NOW L WAIT FOR MY BENEFECT THANK YOU JUDGE KEEP DOING GOD JOB
this judge should be removed from the bench. there doctors siad i was disabled my doctors said the same.my mom died jan 9 2012 his decision came jan 12 2012 denied could not make house payments lightbills food borrowed money to creamate her lost my my work credits lost my back pay and for what because he said i did not look disabled so i guss he just disregards top doctors in there field opinion.thing i lost the house everything but there is vendication i won my case feb 12 2015 in front of judge thompson who they say is the tuffest in florida and the second in the country he said i should have received it then and if he would have been the judge he would have given it to me. so with that being said i am homeless when it should not have happend i lost over half of my back pay and at least half of the monthly money so were justice for the working man there is none.p.s judge thompson was very fair and throw
hey its homeless again judge Moran I for give you for all the pain you have caused me the loss of my home which was my inhairantance which was from my mother.the back money from 2010 when i filed the claim and your unfair and wrong decision in 2012 and would also like to thank the appeals counsil for the poor job that they did in not looking at the new evidents which would have fixed the problem but you also did not do your jobs i sent new records that showed new proof of my disabilty and you say that you looked at them but when you sen the evadents you supposly looked at it was not there wonder were it went. thin air? So i had to refile in 2013 which took my work credits cause i had to refile so now i get ssi not ssd i fought my ass off to keep all my things and lost all of it my mother the house all the things in the house cloths pictures furnture family airlooms all my mothers stuff my stuff as people picked threw it on the side of the road and after all that you will not even do nothing to fix the mistake but i forgive its time to move on because there is one thing you could not take is my happiness and determnation and my spirit.
The social security and job compensation Judge's don't treat Black people fair. After waiting for two years to be seen, I was told that if I didn't sign a piece of paper saying I'm waiving my SSD benefits, if not I'll have to wait for another court date. He basically threatened me, knowing that I person who have a waited over two years and now if I say I don't want it, I can received my award soon. But when my white friends applied, they got SSI and SSD, if you look my race, how each person was awarded, YOU WILL FIND DISCREPANCY AND UNFAIRNESS!
In Puerto Rico the Administrate Judge could be more faster in the decision of audience There a people that wait 18 to 24 months and later wait a decision 30 to 90 days plus , We Understand there many people but the jugde there keep a balance of all its not only the auditions We need the send the letters of decisions more faster Thanks
In Puerto Rico the Administrate Judge could be more faster in the decision of audience There a people that wait 18 to 24 months and later wait a decision 30 to 90 days plus , We Understand there many people but the jugde there keep a balance of all its not only the auditions We need the send the letters of decisions more faster Thanks
Despite overwhelming evidence of a heart condition that cannot be treated with meds due to other health problems I was denied. I think he is a nice man,but he just doesn't understand difficult and hard to diagnose cases. I am still waiting on an appeal from his decision meanwhile I have no help or assistance of any kind I will be living out of my car soon!!!!!!! Even if he can't understand what my life is like with my heart problems I have to everyday and wonder why he made that bad decision...
Despite overwhelming evidence of a heart condition that cannot be treated with meds due to other health problems I was denied. I think he is a nice man,but he just doesn't understand difficult and hard to diagnose cases. I am still waiting on an appeal from his decision meanwhile I have no help or assistance of any kind I will be living out of my car soon!!!!!!! Even if he can't understand what my life is like with my heart problems I have to everyday and wonder why he made that bad decision...
Despite overwhelming evidence of a heart condition that cannot be treated with meds due to other health problems I was denied. I think he is a nice man,but he just doesn't understand difficult and hard to diagnose cases. I am still waiting on an appeal from his decision meanwhile I have no help or assistance of any kind I will be living out of my car soon!!!!!!! Even if he can't understand what my life is like with my heart problems I have to everyday and wonder why he made that bad decision...
Rude, disrespectful individual - deserves class action to be removed from his position with no right to be a judge anymore
Judge Packer gave me a fair decision. My lawyer did most of the talking. What amazed me about the judicial process was how different approach my lawyer took than I would have on my own. My thought would be to clearly demonstrate where the law is on your side and be prepared to make references to other case decisions which support the interpretation of those laws. True to my expectations, incontrovertible evidence was rigorously required, but the court seemed to hold relevant things that should not have entered into consideration and the important facts became obscured. Still the right decision was made so I don't exactly have anything to complain about.
I Was Before Judge On April 5th Of 2017 My Condition Are Severe Copd, Lower Back Herniated Disks, My Legs Give Out Constantly So Much That I Do Not Feel Safe Driving A Car, I Have Titanium Ankle And Have Had Knee Surgery To Fix Problematic Knees From Years Of Well Drilling & Overexertion, I Would Love Nothing More That To Be Able To Work As I Did As A Well Driller / Pump Mechanic For Many Years Of My Life, I Do Not Trust Doctors As I Believe They Only Want To Treat Symptoms With Harmful Drugs That Cause Other Problems Not Cure The Issues That Tend To Ail Us. I Was Denied My Disability That I Paid Into For Many Years Chances Ar4e I Will Not Live To Collect It As At 49 I Feel & Move Around Like I'm 90 I Just Wish He Could Walk A Day In My Shoes To See And Feel What I Do .i Took His Decision As If Ok I Just Need To Man Up So I Went To Apply At Several Locations One Was A Dollar General Down The Street I Know The Manager He Told Me "We Can't Hire You, Buddy, You Can't Even Hardly Walk" After That, I Was All Set To Work At A Place Locally Until We Got To The Physical Examination Part The Dr. They Said I Was Not Able To Do The Job, As I Didn't Have The Computer Skills And The Dust And Other Stuff Would Aggravate My Copd "The Job Was Answering Phones In An Office" Ive Been Turned Down From So Many Jobs Before Even Filling Out The Application. The Part That Bothers Me The Most Was In The Denial Letter Where It Stated In Bold Letters That Subject Is Able To Speak English Clearly My Parents Both Paid Into S.s. For 40 Years Each Both Passed Away At 66 Never Collecting A Dime I Will Not Make It To 66 So Why Did I Pay Into A System That Does Nothing For Me?> I Just Wish This Judge Could Live One Day In My Shoes To See The Depression I Hide Daily, To See & Understand Waking Up In The Morning And Not Even Knowing Where You Are Due To Lack Of Oxygen To The Brain, Peeing My Pants Because I Can't Get To The Bathroom Fast Enough Due To My Back And Legs Giving Out, Not Being Able To Properly Take Care Of My Wife And Actually End Up Crawling There, How Does A Person Who Doesn't Trust The Medical Field I Watched Destroy Both Of My Parents With Medication Upon Medication, Deal With A System That Only Trusts The Same Dr's Word? I Guess I'm Just Screwed. The Judge Isn't A Bad Guy, He Is Very Likable It's Just The System That Sucks God Bless
Here is the most important thing you need to know about Judge Packer: You MUST give him a pre-hearing memo outlining your case, and any particular facts you think it's important for him to know that may not readily jump out of the record. He likes to know the record cold. If you give him a memo he will be familiar with it. He is a very smart and very well prepared ALJ and he expects the same of attorneys who appear before him (lest you be prepared for drill-sergeant level pre-hearing reaming out!). He has a gruff exterior and is no B.S. and to the point. Beneath all of that however he is a very kindly, decent man, who, in my view, really wants to help the claimant if he can. I encountered Judge Packer through a video hearing. Two other attorneys in my office also had hearings with him the same day, and all gave him high marks. Your client will get a very fair shake from Judge Packer. He is a really nice ALJ, as long as you do your prep work. I'd happily welcome another opportunity to appear before him.
Although this particular judge heard me out and asked really good questions and made me feel very comfortable, at the same time he looked as though he was just speeding through my case. I had 12 years of paper work proving my case from a few doctors, amazing letters from my therapist and psychiatrist, DSS records and school records riddled with abuse- denied. The part I think that made it even more obvious that this judge WRONGFULLY denied me was that my particular disability that I have documentation of, 12-13 years of proof, and present day as well, I was actually a SSDI RECIPIENT FOR 4 YEARS FROM 14-18yrs old!!!!!! I only stopped recieving because of my disability, I was homeless and jobless and didnt keep my review appointment with the psychiatrist, who left 5 minutes early I later found out!!!! COMPLETE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO HAVE PAID INTO THESE BENEFITS ARE OUT HERE SUFFERING.
Although this particular judge heard me out and asked really good questions and made me feel very comfortable, at the same time he looked as though he was just speeding through my case. I had 12 years of paper work proving my case from a few doctors, amazing letters from my therapist and psychiatrist, DSS records and school records riddled with abuse- denied. The part I think that made it even more obvious that this judge WRONGFULLY denied me was that my particular disability that I have documentation of, 12-13 years of proof, and present day as well, I was actually a SSDI RECIPIENT FOR 4 YEARS FROM 14-18yrs old!!!!!! I only stopped recieving because of my disability, I was homeless and jobless and didnt keep my review appointment with the psychiatrist, who left 5 minutes early I later found out!!!! COMPLETE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO HAVE PAID INTO THESE BENEFITS ARE OUT HERE SUFFERING.
Although this particular judge heard me out and asked really good questions and made me feel very comfortable, at the same time he looked as though he was just speeding through my case. I had 12 years of paper work proving my case from a few doctors, amazing letters from my therapist and psychiatrist, DSS records and school records riddled with abuse- denied. The part I think that made it even more obvious that this judge WRONGFULLY denied me was that my particular disability that I have documentation of, 12-13 years of proof, and present day as well, I was actually a SSDI RECIPIENT FOR 4 YEARS FROM 14-18yrs old!!!!!! I only stopped recieving because of my disability, I was homeless and jobless and didnt keep my review appointment with the psychiatrist, who left 5 minutes early I later found out!!!! COMPLETE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO HAVE PAID INTO THESE BENEFITS ARE OUT HERE SUFFERING.
I just got home from my hearing. I wasn't denied and I didn't get a bench decision but I found the judge to be very fair and thorough. He asked the important questions and did his due diligence in finding the facts out. It lasted about an hour. I was with my attorney. She hit it out of the park. The vocational expert had his questions and a few jobs that I could do in his opinion. It's just the process. Either way, approval or denial, I was satisfied. I can always appeal. My case was strong and had years of documented surgery and Doctors opinions that favored me getting SSI. Nothing in this world is guaranteed. You have to work on it and get an attorney and cough up a couple grand of your money. It's not the judge, it's you. If you were denied you're case wasn't strong. Point blank.
I just got home from my hearing. I wasn't denied and I didn't get a bench decision but I found the judge to be very fair and thorough. He asked the important questions and did his due diligence in finding the facts out. It lasted about an hour. I was with my attorney. She hit it out of the park. The vocational expert had his questions and a few jobs that I could do in his opinion. It's just the process. Either way, approval or denial, I was satisfied. I can always appeal. My case was strong and had years of documented surgery and Doctors opinions that favored me getting SSI. Nothing in this world is guaranteed. You have to work on it and get an attorney and cough up a couple grand of your money. It's not the judge, it's you. If you were denied you're case wasn't strong. Point blank.
I just got home from my hearing. I wasn't denied and I didn't get a bench decision but I found the judge to be very fair and thorough. He asked the important questions and did his due diligence in finding the facts out. It lasted about an hour. I was with my attorney. She hit it out of the park. The vocational expert had his questions and a few jobs that I could do in his opinion. It's just the process. Either way, approval or denial, I was satisfied. I can always appeal. My case was strong and had years of documented surgery and Doctors opinions that favored me getting SSI. Nothing in this world is guaranteed. You have to work on it and get an attorney and cough up a couple grand of your money. It's not the judge, it's you. If you were denied you're case wasn't strong. Point blank.
The person above me is being unfair, you were denied plain and simple because you missed your appointment, this judge doesn't approve of that type of behavior. I was told from the beginning that if I missed any appointments that he would dismiss my case. He is the head judge, a very fair man who made me feel comfortable. I received a favorable decision with a different onset date, but he really helped my case and would have received it from the onset date if I had sent him the proper paperwork, it was an oversight on my part, I cannot blame Judge Ramsey. I thank him and I know he has a low rating as far as approvals go, but he sort of sees right through the bologna. You can always appeal your decision from him. I'm very satisfied with his decision and thank him for making me feel comfortable in his courtroom and being a very decent human being as well as his staff. My suggestion would be, be prepared, don't be dishonest and have medical documentations to back up your claims. He wants to see that you are following through with your treatment, otherwise he has to follow the law. Would I have liked a fully favorable decision, of course, but why would I begrudge a man doing his job because of my errors?
The person above me is being unfair, you were denied plain and simple because you missed your appointment, this judge doesn't approve of that type of behavior. I was told from the beginning that if I missed any appointments that he would dismiss my case. He is the head judge, a very fair man who made me feel comfortable. I received a favorable decision with a different onset date, but he really helped my case and would have received it from the onset date if I had sent him the proper paperwork, it was an oversight on my part, I cannot blame Judge Ramsey. I thank him and I know he has a low rating as far as approvals go, but he sort of sees right through the bologna. You can always appeal your decision from him. I'm very satisfied with his decision and thank him for making me feel comfortable in his courtroom and being a very decent human being as well as his staff. My suggestion would be, be prepared, don't be dishonest and have medical documentations to back up your claims. He wants to see that you are following through with your treatment, otherwise he has to follow the law. Would I have liked a fully favorable decision, of course, but why would I begrudge a man doing his job because of my errors?
The person above me is being unfair, you were denied plain and simple because you missed your appointment, this judge doesn't approve of that type of behavior. I was told from the beginning that if I missed any appointments that he would dismiss my case. He is the head judge, a very fair man who made me feel comfortable. I received a favorable decision with a different onset date, but he really helped my case and would have received it from the onset date if I had sent him the proper paperwork, it was an oversight on my part, I cannot blame Judge Ramsey. I thank him and I know he has a low rating as far as approvals go, but he sort of sees right through the bologna. You can always appeal your decision from him. I'm very satisfied with his decision and thank him for making me feel comfortable in his courtroom and being a very decent human being as well as his staff. My suggestion would be, be prepared, don't be dishonest and have medical documentations to back up your claims. He wants to see that you are following through with your treatment, otherwise he has to follow the law. Would I have liked a fully favorable decision, of course, but why would I begrudge a man doing his job because of my errors?
The person above me is being unfair, you were denied plain and simple because you missed your appointment, this judge doesn't approve of that type of behavior. I was told from the beginning that if I missed any appointments that he would dismiss my case. He is the head judge, a very fair man who made me feel comfortable. I received a favorable decision with a different onset date, but he really helped my case and would have received it from the onset date if I had sent him the proper paperwork, it was an oversight on my part, I cannot blame Judge Ramsey. I thank him and I know he has a low rating as far as approvals go, but he sort of sees right through the bologna. You can always appeal your decision from him. I'm very satisfied with his decision and thank him for making me feel comfortable in his courtroom and being a very decent human being as well as his staff. My suggestion would be, be prepared, don't be dishonest and have medical documentations to back up your claims. He wants to see that you are following through with your treatment, otherwise he has to follow the law. Would I have liked a fully favorable decision, of course, but why would I begrudge a man doing his job because of my errors?
This judge didn't even look at all my medical I could barely walk and still denied me....HORRIBLE
This judge didn't even look at all my medical I could barely walk and still denied me....HORRIBLE
This judge didn't even look at all my medical I could barely walk and still denied me....HORRIBLE
Had my hear with this judge, in july 2014 i went for a closed period, he ask me a few questions, i answered honestly i was disabled for the period of time i was asking for and he gave me a ruling on the bench. He did his job end of story. Thank god i am able to work again, granted i cant do what i did before but i want to work so i will find something to fit my abilities.
I wanted to say i had my heaing held on dec 2 2015 in front alj william ramsey i was extremely nervous he made things so much easier for me very kind and very understanding someone who understands what i was going through and feb 22 2016 i recieved my fully favorable decision i just want to thank william ramsey for his time and understanding win or lose hw['s great at what he does ty william ramsey for everything
Today, I met with ALJ Ramsey, he was polite, welcoming, and made me feel comfortable. I totally broke down talking about all the past and on going medical issues. He was completely kind and offered tissues. The Voc Exp could not find one job I could do at this time. He made no decision at the bench. I will find out in writing, some time from now. Either way, Ramsey is stern but fair, cares but doesn't want to be fooled. He will ask questions. He will listen. I liked him, he was a no nonsense type of guy. My suggestion is, you be on point with him and he will give you all the respect you deserve.
I had my hearing this morning. I was extremely nervous and have no idea what the outcome will be. I felt it was important to review Judge Ramsey as he had been respectful, professional and fair. Whatever the outcome, I felt my hearing was fair and I felt like I had been heard. My only regret was not relaying my final words- I clammed up. I am not the best at articulating vocally. I wished I had ended on “Sometimes people just need some help getting through struggles and recovery- hoping that recovery will take place and I can re enter the workplace with a new start.” At the end of the day... I feel relieved to have had my story told.
On December 17, I had a hearing with Judge Ramsey and I was scared and nervous but he put me at ease. He listens and he allows you to tell him your case with respect. I was shocked at how much knowledge he had regarding my disability and that let me know that he understands not only the legal aspect but also the medical. Yes, I lost it and looked a total mess but I felt safe to put my guard down. There was hope. He heard my struggle and I am forever grateful.
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
I had my SSI hearing with my attorney Lorie from quick Aid attorney on July 31 2019 and it sounds like base on my medical records and me and my lawyer and the ve test amonies Their were no jobs I can work 40 hours week 8 hours shift,So good luck to me and my attorney just a copy of my meds list she should of had copy just the judge if I forgot name of them all so she had leave my case up to 2 weeks open to get copy of my meds list the alj Sajuta Roger's then wait for her to send a copy to me and my attorney and just wait on the out come of my hearing with alj Sajuta Rogers.Her question was straight forward questions I was calm and just answer her question when I was ask.Again good luck to me and my attorney who was prepare just she had another hearing before I did add and got alot paperwork and just didn't have a copy of my meds list which was gonna be avoided the 2 weeks my SSI case still process of apeal been over year already.But it was nice to meet her in person and she didn't call me much but that one day that if I have transportation to OHO boston I khow were it is.
God bless Alj SajutaRogers Amen.And my attorney Lorrie Amen.Im blessed they helped me with my ssi claim.
Hello has anyone been before ALJ Sajuta Rodgers and been successful with no lawyer?
I haven't seen Rodgers is person I'm waiting for her to look over my case I'm hoping and praying she take my new Evidence into consideration .. I talked to her workers every other day for a update and the lady is really nice and helpful
found judge ross very open and helpful.
found judge ross very open and helpful.
found judge ross very open and helpful.
found judge ross very open and helpful.
My case is asigned To Judge Carol A Sax.So my attorney and i prepare to go to the odar and hear about How my lower back pain because of degenitive dic dease and moderate depresion and and anxiety would working full time impossibly.
I hope from the aproval percents of Alj Carol A Sax that were aproval of 63 percent and dissmiss was 20 percent and 18 percent would have her aprove my case since i had a hearing with her so good luck to me and just waiting for hear decion on my case and the results would be different then the first judge i had a hearing with Henry J Hogan which was unfavorble decion which i apealed to the apeal councial that took them 13 months just to denie and say my medical records looks like i was disable after the alj henry j hogans decion to reapply and dds denied me and filed a apeal for reconsideration and got denied again and had to file another apeal request for a hearing with a alj carol a sax so its a long and fustration apeal process and hope the decion results are different then a unfavorble decion from Alj Carol A Sax And good luck to me amen.
Judge Sax denied my case. The va expert agreed i could not work. Judge sax decided i could work part time in a mail room. I am 54 yrs old. I have worked for 30 years. I have spinal stenosis. Depression anxiety. Also carpel tunnel. I found her rude and after 6 years to get denied she has ruined my life.
Is Carol Sax still hearing cases? If so, what a shame! She is “milquetoast:” dull in intellect; lacking in empathy; and, most definitely, devoid of personality, especially, levity and humor.(She always made me sleepy!) But, wait! She is the Bureaucrat’s Bureaucrat in a perfectly Bureaucratic system! Does anyone else not marvel that SSA spent resources to rebrand “ODAR,” an appropriate description of the Agency’s mission, to “OHO,” which reflects “laughter,” and is so close to “UHO,” like, I do not want to know what “The Confederacy of Dunces” are planning next!
Is Carol Sax still hearing cases? If so, what a shame! She is “milquetoast:” dull in intellect; lacking in empathy; and, most definitely, devoid of personality, especially, levity and humor.(She always made me sleepy!) But, wait! She is the Bureaucrat’s Bureaucrat in a perfectly Bureaucratic system! Does anyone else not marvel that SSA spent resources to rebrand “ODAR,” an appropriate description of the Agency’s mission, to “OHO,” which reflects “laughter,” and is so close to “UHO,” like, I do not want to know what “The Confederacy of Dunces” are planning next!
I was before him recently. I had the impression that he did not approach my case objectively, but was looking for a justification to deny it. When he asked the employment specialist if I was capable of certain work requirements, he misstated what I had told him - under oath - and what was in my medical record. I've been told by two lawyers, unconnected with each other, that Teehan has the reputation of being harsh and biased. Why have his approvals dropped so dramatically in the last two years? Look at the statistics below.
I was before him recently. I had the impression that he did not approach my case objectively, but was looking for a justification to deny it. When he asked the employment specialist if I was capable of certain work requirements, he misstated what I had told him - under oath - and what was in my medical record. I've been told by two lawyers, unconnected with each other, that Teehan has the reputation of being harsh and biased. Why have his approvals dropped so dramatically in the last two years? Look at the statistics below.
I was before him recently. I had the impression that he did not approach my case objectively, but was looking for a justification to deny it. When he asked the employment specialist if I was capable of certain work requirements, he misstated what I had told him - under oath - and what was in my medical record. I've been told by two lawyers, unconnected with each other, that Teehan has the reputation of being harsh and biased. Why have his approvals dropped so dramatically in the last two years? Look at the statistics below.
Judge Teehan heard my case late 2013. During this hearing Judge Teehan misstated dates as well as the Vocational Specialist's answers, insinuated that I lied about my limitations, was 1.5 hours late hearing my case and offered no explanation or apology for keeping me waiting and then questioned me for approximately 90 minutes. During this questioning Judge Teehan acted as if he were prosecuting me with his condescending tone and excessive questioning. When we left the hearing, my attorney apologized to me for having to go through this hearing that she described as cruel. She stated that Judge Teehan is a nightmare and his excessive questioning was unfair. If I was younger with little medical evidence, then questioning for 90 minutes might have been warranted, however, I am 58 years old, had worked since I was12 years old and never collected welfare or unemployment. I have had several MRI's showing severe back arthritis, moderate canal stenosis, moderate neuro foraminal stenosis, 4 circumferential bulging discs with protrusion into nerves, etc. I have been under the care of a surgeon from MGH and a physiotherapist since late 2010 for my back problems and have had several injections to alleviate the pain and discomfort and unfortunately , nothing has helped. The surgeon at MGH told me that I had so many problems with my back that with surgery I have a 50/50 chance of feeling 30 percent better. These odds aren't worth the risks from surgery and I will have to survive through pain management, injections, PT, medication, etc. Because I can no longer work and was denied SSI, I have had deplete my 401k and all my savings to survive the past 4 years and recently had to move in with a relative because I can no longer afford to pay rent. I have appealed to the SSI Council and will take my case to Federal Court if need be. Additionally, I am lodging a complaint against Judge Teehan for his excessive questioning, his accusation that I signed a document in 2012 stating I wasn't disabled which I never signed and his blatant biased behavior. Judge Teehan is a disgrace and detriment to the SSI disability program and should be reprimanded and removed from his role as a judge based on his biased and disgraceful behavior towards SSI disability applicants. All the SSI Council needs to do is to listen to the tape of my hearing to validate Judge Teehan's misconduct and if has hasn't already, will become their "worst nightmare" if he remains an SSI judge.
I was told judge Teehan was going to be hard and ruthless. He seemed kind to me. I just worry that I didn't give all my answers with full explanation s or if I even gave all of the important information out of anxiety. I wish I could have had a video hearing. It would have been easier and less stress! This is a life changing decision. Now I will panicked until I get the decision because the percentage is so low to be approved. I really hope they have to really see the medic impairments and not just denied because of a wrong answer. These hearings are frightening as it is. Well, wish me luck please.God bless all of you!
Going into my husband's hearing with Judge Teehan we were very nervous. We had heard so many bad things about him and how harsh he was. Boy were we wrong!! He listened to the Medical Expert and that was it, hearing was over. He didn't even ask the VE any questions. My husband's case was found fully favorable less than a month later! If you have all your medical records and have a legit disability, then there is no reason why a Judge would deny you. Judge Teehan was very fair and understanding. And I'm not just saying this because my husband was approved. he really listens and as long as you have done everything you are supposed to, then there is no reason to fear him. He even thanked my Husband at the end for his service.
I too was before judge teehan and he is a bully, he intimidates you rolls his eyes at you pretty much makes you feel like a liar as soon as you sit down. He cherry picks info just to deny you.he made a huge mistake on my case saying I'm a substancabuser never! I am not taking this one but! He has a problem I'm not going away till he fix that asap!
So i guess you have to be half Dead to get ssdi money you Worked for all your life. Whats he trying to save the Government your money. Teehan is a disgrace i have a Legitamite disablitity . dont be Fooled by the man behind the mask. 90 minutes with this *****. Third party was asked about My capability to work and they Said unemployable. Now what The **** am i going to do Have some compassion judge We all werent lucky enough like You to go to law school. And look Down your nose at all the injured Physically or mentally peasants As long as you can sleep at night. Good luck everyone with all these Mass liberal judge. Thats another Thing as soon as they find out Your a veteran red flag hes A conservative. Denie his claim. Dont believe it dosent happen Think again. Just to stick it right up Your ***.
Judge Sean Teehan, Well I drove my niece from Metro West area because she can not drive on her Medications partly due to her Documented PTSD And ANXIETY ISSUES, I also attended for , Emotional support for her. Judge a. Teehan would NOT ALLOW ME TO SIT WITH HER DURING HIS SESSION!. This man screams out for a sensitivity class, were ishis human decent??