KANSAS-CITY, Missouri Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Kansas-city, MISSOURI, 21 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Kansas-city, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 12 months. The average case processing time in Kansas-city is 363 days. The Kansas-city average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 33%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Kansas-city ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KANSAS CITY | 21 | 12.0 months | 363 days | 1.9 | 22% | 33% | 46% |
| MISSOURI | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.00 months | 1.90 | 363 days | 3980 | 3120 | 2731 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 33
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linda L Sybrant | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Guy E Taylor | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ross Stubblefield | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| James S Stubbs | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Richard N Staples | 33% | 16% | 51% |
| Raymond L Souza | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Jack R Reed | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mark Naggi | 51% | 23% | 26% |
| Gerald Meyr | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Christina Y Mein | 27% | 23% | 50% |
| Jack D McCarthy | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael A Lehr | 49% | 19% | 32% |
| Sherianne Laba | 50% | 13% | 38% |
| Robert A Kelly | 26% | 26% | 48% |
| P. H Jung | 38% | 25% | 37% |
| Peter Jung | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Scott Johnson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| William G Horne | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Scot Gulick | 21% | 20% | 58% |
| Evelyn M Gunn | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| James F Gillet | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| JOHN H FRAZE | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Diana Erickson | 46% | 21% | 33% |
| Christine E Dibble | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Joan H Deans | 30% | 24% | 46% |
| Christine A Cooke | 43% | 25% | 33% |
| Michael Comisky | 38% | 32% | 30% |
| Michael D Burrichter | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Alison K Brookins | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| George M Bock | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Susan B Blaney | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Debra Bice | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Janice E Barnes-Williams | 24% | 22% | 55% |
383 Comments
Very professional and respectful.
Very professional and respectful.
Very professional and respectful.
If you look at her record she clearly denies disability appeals just to keep her percentage down. She denies more appeals than any other judge in the state or the nation. You may want to question why her numbers are significantly different than everyone else.
If you look at her record she clearly denies disability appeals just to keep her percentage down. She denies more appeals than any other judge in the state or the nation. You may want to question why her numbers are significantly different than everyone else.
If you look at her record she clearly denies disability appeals just to keep her percentage down. She denies more appeals than any other judge in the state or the nation. You may want to question why her numbers are significantly different than everyone else.
This judge was respectful, but based her decision on the Social Security doctor's 10 minute exam, instead of my primary care doctor's evaluation of me. I knew going in she had a very low approval rating compared to others in the KC office. She seemed to have her mind already made up at the beginning. Just bad luck on my part to have her assigned to my case instead of one of the others. Good luck to others if she ends up being your ALJ.
This judge was respectful, but based her decision on the Social Security doctor's 10 minute exam, instead of my primary care doctor's evaluation of me. I knew going in she had a very low approval rating compared to others in the KC office. She seemed to have her mind already made up at the beginning. Just bad luck on my part to have her assigned to my case instead of one of the others. Good luck to others if she ends up being your ALJ.
This judge was respectful, but based her decision on the Social Security doctor's 10 minute exam, instead of my primary care doctor's evaluation of me. I knew going in she had a very low approval rating compared to others in the KC office. She seemed to have her mind already made up at the beginning. Just bad luck on my part to have her assigned to my case instead of one of the others. Good luck to others if she ends up being your ALJ.
Prior review on 07/26/16 is spot on. Basically going through the motions, her decision has already been made. She is going to adopt the DDS decision no matter what
Prior review on 07/26/16 is spot on. Basically going through the motions, her decision has already been made. She is going to adopt the DDS decision no matter what
Prior review on 07/26/16 is spot on. Basically going through the motions, her decision has already been made. She is going to adopt the DDS decision no matter what
cheapest generic viagra buy cheap viagra viagra price comparison
cheapest generic viagra buy cheap viagra viagra price comparison
This judge was very thorough. I felt heard during my testimony (at the phone hearing due to COVID-19). She listed all of the supporting information used in her decision and granted me disability for an illness that is extremely rare and not very well-known. I appreciate her thoroughness and the positive finding.
This judge was very thorough. I felt heard during my testimony (at the phone hearing due to COVID-19). She listed all of the supporting information used in her decision and granted me disability for an illness that is extremely rare and not very well-known. I appreciate her thoroughness and the positive finding.
I waited so long for this hearing. It took all of 5 minutes. To me, the judge seemed disinterested in the entire proceeding. My attorney ( who leaves something to be desired) said it didn't look good for me. I have not received a decision yet, but am very disappointed about the entire thing.
I waited so long for this hearing. It took all of 5 minutes. To me, the judge seemed disinterested in the entire proceeding. My attorney ( who leaves something to be desired) said it didn't look good for me. I have not received a decision yet, but am very disappointed about the entire thing.
I waited so long for this hearing. It took all of 5 minutes. To me, the judge seemed disinterested in the entire proceeding. My attorney ( who leaves something to be desired) said it didn't look good for me. I have not received a decision yet, but am very disappointed about the entire thing.
I Am Baffled By This Due Process - The hearing was to Be a Fair and Impartial Hearing - Judge George M Bock - (1.) His Demeanor He Seams to be More as An Agent of The Social Security Administration - Not That of A Impartial Hearings Officer, Who Not going to Bite The Hand That Feeds Him - all the while Disposing of Cases As Unfavorable, and/or finding Claimant as Not Being Creditable, when The Doctors Statements do not list ailments or pains the way Social Security want them to read as the Claimant has declared, and Testified to, so Placing The Burden of Proof on the claimant to get his Doctor to record each and every one into his medical record exactly Translated into the cause and Effects of The Malady when no Doctor in his Medical Profession Is Going to Consider That "Medication Side Effects" of Rx Medications and list each And Every one could be caused - by Big Pharma Companies - Yet each and every day Many Patients are Prescribed doses that May not be safe or effective over time, causing More harm to the claimant and /are of Class action Law Suites that are filed every day, for Jury's to decide. What is a Doctor is Going to bite The hand of Big Pharma? - Judge George M Bock - Is Not a Doctor - and no Doctor was Present During The Hearing from The Missouri State Review Doctor to be crossed examined in the Hearing - Violating My Due Process to be able to have My Counsel properly To do so. - Judge George M Bock had Not availed Pryor to the Hearing What Medical Records And which ones Had Been Cherry Picked By SSA contractors and or The Burden Of SSA To Furnish All My Complete Medical Records Were Obtained Completely and Fully Read - as he seams to indicate (ie 3.) The records contain NO EXAMINATION RESULTS, - (that Statement by him is Shocking and inaccurate on it's Face) - LABORATORY DATA, hospital or clinical studies, medical signs or findings or other persuasive evidence to Support a Conclusion that the Claimant's medical condition -(Not Specific here, as to what medical condition is he referring specifically to? what one?)- meets or equals any of the criteria set forth any impairment. Moreover, the claimant's attorney {HAS NOT} presented persuasive evidence or arguments that the claimant's impairments met or equaled the criteria for any listing. ( Meaning We wasted his time on this SSI and he view the attorney as too young, and incompetent, to represent the claimant in this matter.) - On a Tagent note About Judge George M Bock - Being clueless to the Malarkey Social Security Administration Pull's on The Cases's he does Affirm or Approve in Favor of - They Delbertly "Over-Pay Almost all claimant's" On Purpose - So They can't depend on an amount, because of The Fuzy Math in Calculating there Benefits, WRONG, and now have to Pay back the over-payment'(S). - Further More Malarkey - The SSA - A Child who is Born but dies later on due to Health Issues, Once a Doctor Signs a Death Certificate, They wont Issue a SSN Number, Causing a Taxpayer not to be able to claim the deduction for the Deceased Child - Causing The Tax Examiner To Correspond for a Social Security Number - The can't get, Thus issuing a CP 2000 Tax Notification - The Taxpayer of Not Filing on time - Penalty an Interest. - Refund or Not - having then to endure "More Stres" after lousing a Child too. - Cause and Effect - Judge George M Bock - Is surly Not Even aware of this, that SSA does Harm! - Another Malarkey - Then after Sending Claimant's to a Consultative Medical Exam By The State of Missouri - afterwards a Denial Letter is Sent, Supposedly By The Mo State Employee who sends a letter out using a SSA Envelope, but Postage was Paid in Lee's Summit Missouri office Zip-Code by an Missouri Employee, in violation of The Postal Code's - And Misrepresentation as an SSA Employee when she was not !!! and he Judge George M Bock is Clue less to this stuff...by SSA. - - -
I Am Baffled By This Due Process - The hearing was to Be a Fair and Impartial Hearing - Judge George M Bock - (1.) His Demeanor He Seams to be More as An Agent of The Social Security Administration - Not That of A Impartial Hearings Officer, Who Not going to Bite The Hand That Feeds Him - all the while Disposing of Cases As Unfavorable, and/or finding Claimant as Not Being Creditable, when The Doctors Statements do not list ailments or pains the way Social Security want them to read as the Claimant has declared, and Testified to, so Placing The Burden of Proof on the claimant to get his Doctor to record each and every one into his medical record exactly Translated into the cause and Effects of The Malady when no Doctor in his Medical Profession Is Going to Consider That "Medication Side Effects" of Rx Medications and list each And Every one could be caused - by Big Pharma Companies - Yet each and every day Many Patients are Prescribed doses that May not be safe or effective over time, causing More harm to the claimant and /are of Class action Law Suites that are filed every day, for Jury's to decide. What is a Doctor is Going to bite The hand of Big Pharma? - Judge George M Bock - Is Not a Doctor - and no Doctor was Present During The Hearing from The Missouri State Review Doctor to be crossed examined in the Hearing - Violating My Due Process to be able to have My Counsel properly To do so. - Judge George M Bock had Not availed Pryor to the Hearing What Medical Records And which ones Had Been Cherry Picked By SSA contractors and or The Burden Of SSA To Furnish All My Complete Medical Records Were Obtained Completely and Fully Read - as he seams to indicate (ie 3.) The records contain NO EXAMINATION RESULTS, - (that Statement by him is Shocking and inaccurate on it's Face) - LABORATORY DATA, hospital or clinical studies, medical signs or findings or other persuasive evidence to Support a Conclusion that the Claimant's medical condition -(Not Specific here, as to what medical condition is he referring specifically to? what one?)- meets or equals any of the criteria set forth any impairment. Moreover, the claimant's attorney {HAS NOT} presented persuasive evidence or arguments that the claimant's impairments met or equaled the criteria for any listing. ( Meaning We wasted his time on this SSI and he view the attorney as too young, and incompetent, to represent the claimant in this matter.) - On a Tagent note About Judge George M Bock - Being clueless to the Malarkey Social Security Administration Pull's on The Cases's he does Affirm or Approve in Favor of - They Delbertly "Over-Pay Almost all claimant's" On Purpose - So They can't depend on an amount, because of The Fuzy Math in Calculating there Benefits, WRONG, and now have to Pay back the over-payment'(S). - Further More Malarkey - The SSA - A Child who is Born but dies later on due to Health Issues, Once a Doctor Signs a Death Certificate, They wont Issue a SSN Number, Causing a Taxpayer not to be able to claim the deduction for the Deceased Child - Causing The Tax Examiner To Correspond for a Social Security Number - The can't get, Thus issuing a CP 2000 Tax Notification - The Taxpayer of Not Filing on time - Penalty an Interest. - Refund or Not - having then to endure "More Stres" after lousing a Child too. - Cause and Effect - Judge George M Bock - Is surly Not Even aware of this, that SSA does Harm! - Another Malarkey - Then after Sending Claimant's to a Consultative Medical Exam By The State of Missouri - afterwards a Denial Letter is Sent, Supposedly By The Mo State Employee who sends a letter out using a SSA Envelope, but Postage was Paid in Lee's Summit Missouri office Zip-Code by an Missouri Employee, in violation of The Postal Code's - And Misrepresentation as an SSA Employee when she was not !!! and he Judge George M Bock is Clue less to this stuff...by SSA. - - -
I Am Baffled By This Due Process - The hearing was to Be a Fair and Impartial Hearing - Judge George M Bock - (1.) His Demeanor He Seams to be More as An Agent of The Social Security Administration - Not That of A Impartial Hearings Officer, Who Not going to Bite The Hand That Feeds Him - all the while Disposing of Cases As Unfavorable, and/or finding Claimant as Not Being Creditable, when The Doctors Statements do not list ailments or pains the way Social Security want them to read as the Claimant has declared, and Testified to, so Placing The Burden of Proof on the claimant to get his Doctor to record each and every one into his medical record exactly Translated into the cause and Effects of The Malady when no Doctor in his Medical Profession Is Going to Consider That "Medication Side Effects" of Rx Medications and list each And Every one could be caused - by Big Pharma Companies - Yet each and every day Many Patients are Prescribed doses that May not be safe or effective over time, causing More harm to the claimant and /are of Class action Law Suites that are filed every day, for Jury's to decide. What is a Doctor is Going to bite The hand of Big Pharma? - Judge George M Bock - Is Not a Doctor - and no Doctor was Present During The Hearing from The Missouri State Review Doctor to be crossed examined in the Hearing - Violating My Due Process to be able to have My Counsel properly To do so. - Judge George M Bock had Not availed Pryor to the Hearing What Medical Records And which ones Had Been Cherry Picked By SSA contractors and or The Burden Of SSA To Furnish All My Complete Medical Records Were Obtained Completely and Fully Read - as he seams to indicate (ie 3.) The records contain NO EXAMINATION RESULTS, - (that Statement by him is Shocking and inaccurate on it's Face) - LABORATORY DATA, hospital or clinical studies, medical signs or findings or other persuasive evidence to Support a Conclusion that the Claimant's medical condition -(Not Specific here, as to what medical condition is he referring specifically to? what one?)- meets or equals any of the criteria set forth any impairment. Moreover, the claimant's attorney {HAS NOT} presented persuasive evidence or arguments that the claimant's impairments met or equaled the criteria for any listing. ( Meaning We wasted his time on this SSI and he view the attorney as too young, and incompetent, to represent the claimant in this matter.) - On a Tagent note About Judge George M Bock - Being clueless to the Malarkey Social Security Administration Pull's on The Cases's he does Affirm or Approve in Favor of - They Delbertly "Over-Pay Almost all claimant's" On Purpose - So They can't depend on an amount, because of The Fuzy Math in Calculating there Benefits, WRONG, and now have to Pay back the over-payment'(S). - Further More Malarkey - The SSA - A Child who is Born but dies later on due to Health Issues, Once a Doctor Signs a Death Certificate, They wont Issue a SSN Number, Causing a Taxpayer not to be able to claim the deduction for the Deceased Child - Causing The Tax Examiner To Correspond for a Social Security Number - The can't get, Thus issuing a CP 2000 Tax Notification - The Taxpayer of Not Filing on time - Penalty an Interest. - Refund or Not - having then to endure "More Stres" after lousing a Child too. - Cause and Effect - Judge George M Bock - Is surly Not Even aware of this, that SSA does Harm! - Another Malarkey - Then after Sending Claimant's to a Consultative Medical Exam By The State of Missouri - afterwards a Denial Letter is Sent, Supposedly By The Mo State Employee who sends a letter out using a SSA Envelope, but Postage was Paid in Lee's Summit Missouri office Zip-Code by an Missouri Employee, in violation of The Postal Code's - And Misrepresentation as an SSA Employee when she was not !!! and he Judge George M Bock is Clue less to this stuff...by SSA. - - -
I want to say judge George M Brock was very fair and very pleasant judge he listened as u explained what is keeping you from working was not judgemental at all and made me feel at ease while i was in his court room..i am so glad i appeared before him after hearing my case i recieved a fully favorable decision thank you judge brock
I want to say judge George M Brock was very fair and very pleasant judge he listened as u explained what is keeping you from working was not judgemental at all and made me feel at ease while i was in his court room..i am so glad i appeared before him after hearing my case i recieved a fully favorable decision thank you judge brock
I want to say judge George M Brock was very fair and very pleasant judge he listened as u explained what is keeping you from working was not judgemental at all and made me feel at ease while i was in his court room..i am so glad i appeared before him after hearing my case i recieved a fully favorable decision thank you judge brock
Judge Bock was very professional during my hearing. He offered myself and my attorney opportunities to speak and state our testimonies without rushing us. I feel he listened to us and our testimony was weighed with the evidence. My advice would be to be prepared and not be nervous. If you have your facts and speak the truth, the truth will prevail. They have a job to do and I feel this judge does his well.
Judge Bock was very professional during my hearing. He offered myself and my attorney opportunities to speak and state our testimonies without rushing us. I feel he listened to us and our testimony was weighed with the evidence. My advice would be to be prepared and not be nervous. If you have your facts and speak the truth, the truth will prevail. They have a job to do and I feel this judge does his well.
Judge Bock was very professional during my hearing. He offered myself and my attorney opportunities to speak and state our testimonies without rushing us. I feel he listened to us and our testimony was weighed with the evidence. My advice would be to be prepared and not be nervous. If you have your facts and speak the truth, the truth will prevail. They have a job to do and I feel this judge does his well.
In his letter of decision, George Bock downplayed and minimized my conditions, cherry picked evidence, and twisted the truth to deny me of my benefits. some major parts of my medical records were left out or ignored and several of Bock's statements were outright lies. In my opinion, Bock is nothing more that a well paid bureaucrat and liar. Shame on you George, kicking people while they are down.
In his letter of decision, George Bock downplayed and minimized my conditions, cherry picked evidence, and twisted the truth to deny me of my benefits. some major parts of my medical records were left out or ignored and several of Bock's statements were outright lies. In my opinion, Bock is nothing more that a well paid bureaucrat and liar. Shame on you George, kicking people while they are down.
In his letter of decision, George Bock downplayed and minimized my conditions, cherry picked evidence, and twisted the truth to deny me of my benefits. some major parts of my medical records were left out or ignored and several of Bock's statements were outright lies. In my opinion, Bock is nothing more that a well paid bureaucrat and liar. Shame on you George, kicking people while they are down.
I saw Judge Bock three years ago. He denied my claim. He had over 50 mistakes in my denial letter. It was clear that he hadn't listened during my hearing or even read my file. He used that fact that I have a Facebook account against me. He was nitpicking everything he could and 98% of it wasn't even right. I ended up going to federal court and they sent it back to SS. My next hearing (with a new judge) is coming up soon. I hope that she familiarizes herself with my case and listens to me at my hearing. I would give Judge Bock 0 stars if I could.
I saw Judge Bock three years ago. He denied my claim. He had over 50 mistakes in my denial letter. It was clear that he hadn't listened during my hearing or even read my file. He used that fact that I have a Facebook account against me. He was nitpicking everything he could and 98% of it wasn't even right. I ended up going to federal court and they sent it back to SS. My next hearing (with a new judge) is coming up soon. I hope that she familiarizes herself with my case and listens to me at my hearing. I would give Judge Bock 0 stars if I could.
I saw Judge Bock three years ago. He denied my claim. He had over 50 mistakes in my denial letter. It was clear that he hadn't listened during my hearing or even read my file. He used that fact that I have a Facebook account against me. He was nitpicking everything he could and 98% of it wasn't even right. I ended up going to federal court and they sent it back to SS. My next hearing (with a new judge) is coming up soon. I hope that she familiarizes herself with my case and listens to me at my hearing. I would give Judge Bock 0 stars if I could.
Had a hearing with this judge. She seemed disinterested in my testimony. She stated it would be a few weeks to a decision. That was 4 months ago. There should be a complaint system in place with oversight to make these judges give timely decisions.
Had a hearing with this judge. She seemed disinterested in my testimony. She stated it would be a few weeks to a decision. That was 4 months ago. There should be a complaint system in place with oversight to make these judges give timely decisions.
Had a hearing with this judge. She seemed disinterested in my testimony. She stated it would be a few weeks to a decision. That was 4 months ago. There should be a complaint system in place with oversight to make these judges give timely decisions.
This judge is worthless. She acts like its her money, too bad there isn't a zero star rating.
This judge is worthless. She acts like its her money, too bad there isn't a zero star rating.
This judge is worthless. She acts like its her money, too bad there isn't a zero star rating.
You are unjust judge Your decision is unjust and unfair I will not forgive you and God will never forgive you if you know that it is a disaster, and you do not know it is a largest misfortune
You are unjust judge Your decision is unjust and unfair I will not forgive you and God will never forgive you if you know that it is a disaster, and you do not know it is a largest misfortune
You are unjust judge Your decision is unjust and unfair I will not forgive you and God will never forgive you if you know that it is a disaster, and you do not know it is a largest misfortune
I believe my young daughter's case was reassigned to this judge at the last minute as he has a high denial rate, so it will be unfavorable.which is very apparent. He doesn't see or know how helpless as a parent feels watching the devastation my daughter's body ( as you can see her bones dislocate and change places) and the constant pain she is in. He doesn't see , feel or know what her mental status is like . He is not having to live any of it. She was born with 2 huge deformities at birth and was denied at 8 weeks old, by social security with a hole in her heart with blood going into her chest, and a hole in her skull where her brain protruded.Giving her massive debilitating and paralyzing migraines leaving her to use a walker. Where her brain( corpus collusum stopped growing) her brain could not receive messages from one side to the other, leaving her a 1.6 gpa, and no education. While not being given special education she was entitled to.It does get worse, as we have watched what horror my daughter has endured for 23 years. I think this is deplorable. It is extremely difficult and has proven impossible to get specialists ( as they are in KS, will not take mo Medicaid) as her Dr agrees, due to her insurance status. As this is her appeal hearing, If my daughter is denied it will be very apparent it is not based on her physical and mental disabilities.
I believe my young daughter's case was reassigned to this judge at the last minute as he has a high denial rate, so it will be unfavorable.which is very apparent. He doesn't see or know how helpless as a parent feels watching the devastation my daughter's body ( as you can see her bones dislocate and change places) and the constant pain she is in. He doesn't see , feel or know what her mental status is like . He is not having to live any of it. She was born with 2 huge deformities at birth and was denied at 8 weeks old, by social security with a hole in her heart with blood going into her chest, and a hole in her skull where her brain protruded.Giving her massive debilitating and paralyzing migraines leaving her to use a walker. Where her brain( corpus collusum stopped growing) her brain could not receive messages from one side to the other, leaving her a 1.6 gpa, and no education. While not being given special education she was entitled to.It does get worse, as we have watched what horror my daughter has endured for 23 years. I think this is deplorable. It is extremely difficult and has proven impossible to get specialists ( as they are in KS, will not take mo Medicaid) as her Dr agrees, due to her insurance status. As this is her appeal hearing, If my daughter is denied it will be very apparent it is not based on her physical and mental disabilities.
I believe my young daughter's case was reassigned to this judge at the last minute as he has a high denial rate, so it will be unfavorable.which is very apparent. He doesn't see or know how helpless as a parent feels watching the devastation my daughter's body ( as you can see her bones dislocate and change places) and the constant pain she is in. He doesn't see , feel or know what her mental status is like . He is not having to live any of it. She was born with 2 huge deformities at birth and was denied at 8 weeks old, by social security with a hole in her heart with blood going into her chest, and a hole in her skull where her brain protruded.Giving her massive debilitating and paralyzing migraines leaving her to use a walker. Where her brain( corpus collusum stopped growing) her brain could not receive messages from one side to the other, leaving her a 1.6 gpa, and no education. While not being given special education she was entitled to.It does get worse, as we have watched what horror my daughter has endured for 23 years. I think this is deplorable. It is extremely difficult and has proven impossible to get specialists ( as they are in KS, will not take mo Medicaid) as her Dr agrees, due to her insurance status. As this is her appeal hearing, If my daughter is denied it will be very apparent it is not based on her physical and mental disabilities.
Very straight forward get down to business judge
Very straight forward get down to business judge
Very straight forward get down to business judge
Total *****. does not care about anyone but himself. Good Lord willing he will develop all the back problems I have, just to be denied benefits after working for 43 years.
Total *****. does not care about anyone but himself. Good Lord willing he will develop all the back problems I have, just to be denied benefits after working for 43 years.
Total *****. does not care about anyone but himself. Good Lord willing he will develop all the back problems I have, just to be denied benefits after working for 43 years.
Judge Comisky made me feel at ease during the process explaining what would take place step by step. I actually felt more at ease with the Judge than I did with my lawyer.
Judge Comisky made me feel at ease during the process explaining what would take place step by step. I actually felt more at ease with the Judge than I did with my lawyer.
Judge Comisky made me feel at ease during the process explaining what would take place step by step. I actually felt more at ease with the Judge than I did with my lawyer.
may he receives as he dishes out. stays on his leash for the government. onesided aint the word why even have a hearing if you draw this alj. more proof that this position should be changed. draw this alj and lose draw another and win,
may he receives as he dishes out. stays on his leash for the government. onesided aint the word why even have a hearing if you draw this alj. more proof that this position should be changed. draw this alj and lose draw another and win,
may he receives as he dishes out. stays on his leash for the government. onesided aint the word why even have a hearing if you draw this alj. more proof that this position should be changed. draw this alj and lose draw another and win,
Mr. Comisky is honest, fair and compassionate. What more could you ask for in a judge? He treated me and my case with dignity and respect. He explained every step as we proceeded with my case, and even allowed me to ask him a couple of questions. He should be the template for how ever judge handles disability cases. If you are lucky enough to have him as your judge, be great full. If you deserve to win you will, if you truly deserve to loose you will and if your case has no merit... he will dismiss it! That’s the simple truth. Judge Comisky is stellar!
Mr. Comisky is honest, fair and compassionate. What more could you ask for in a judge? He treated me and my case with dignity and respect. He explained every step as we proceeded with my case, and even allowed me to ask him a couple of questions. He should be the template for how ever judge handles disability cases. If you are lucky enough to have him as your judge, be great full. If you deserve to win you will, if you truly deserve to loose you will and if your case has no merit... he will dismiss it! That’s the simple truth. Judge Comisky is stellar!
Mr. Comisky is honest, fair and compassionate. What more could you ask for in a judge? He treated me and my case with dignity and respect. He explained every step as we proceeded with my case, and even allowed me to ask him a couple of questions. He should be the template for how ever judge handles disability cases. If you are lucky enough to have him as your judge, be great full. If you deserve to win you will, if you truly deserve to loose you will and if your case has no merit... he will dismiss it! That’s the simple truth. Judge Comisky is stellar!
I'm scared ; worried about my future and the pain l have everyday & not to mention how can l ever find any comfort if l can't afford a Dr's visit ' l am 51 years old and have many of the same health problems that my Mom had in life & she passed away at 62 So my Question is how can one live in any happiness or comfort if his body is definitely getting worse every day ' Thank You Judge Jack Bradley
I'm scared ; worried about my future and the pain l have everyday & not to mention how can l ever find any comfort if l can't afford a Dr's visit ' l am 51 years old and have many of the same health problems that my Mom had in life & she passed away at 62 So my Question is how can one live in any happiness or comfort if his body is definitely getting worse every day ' Thank You Judge Jack Bradley
I'm scared ; worried about my future and the pain l have everyday & not to mention how can l ever find any comfort if l can't afford a Dr's visit ' l am 51 years old and have many of the same health problems that my Mom had in life & she passed away at 62 So my Question is how can one live in any happiness or comfort if his body is definitely getting worse every day ' Thank You Judge Jack Bradley
Hello, my name is Chontay Collins Hill, and I had a positive experience with judge Comisky. He was fair, open and honest. Judge Comisky let me speak and didn't pass judgment: he appears to be aboveboard and a decent man. Thanks, judge Comisky for being fair and just.
Hello, my name is Chontay Collins Hill, and I had a positive experience with judge Comisky. He was fair, open and honest. Judge Comisky let me speak and didn't pass judgment: he appears to be aboveboard and a decent man. Thanks, judge Comisky for being fair and just.
Hello, my name is Chontay Collins Hill, and I had a positive experience with judge Comisky. He was fair, open and honest. Judge Comisky let me speak and didn't pass judgment: he appears to be aboveboard and a decent man. Thanks, judge Comisky for being fair and just.
i have to see mrs.cooke in a month in a half and i really hope she rules in my favor lord knows and myself that i need this. some people really dont but i do my lifes nenver been the same since june 11.2012. i have been in so much gref and pain and my daily life is not the same.. please mrs cooke rule in my favor amen..
i have to see mrs.cooke in a month in a half and i really hope she rules in my favor lord knows and myself that i need this. some people really dont but i do my lifes nenver been the same since june 11.2012. i have been in so much gref and pain and my daily life is not the same.. please mrs cooke rule in my favor amen..
i have to see mrs.cooke in a month in a half and i really hope she rules in my favor lord knows and myself that i need this. some people really dont but i do my lifes nenver been the same since june 11.2012. i have been in so much gref and pain and my daily life is not the same.. please mrs cooke rule in my favor amen..
A fine proffesional judge
A fine proffesional judge
A fine proffesional judge
My first hearing with Judge Christina Cooke was on 10/2013. I appealed it August 2012 after the initial denial in 7/2012 (Applied in February or March.) First date in June 2013 was postponed because the Judge couldn't make it. I was late because I have Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (and a ton more.) My husband worked evenings and forgot to set his alarm! We we're 10 minutes late. Made a 45 trip in 20 minutes I think. I finally got my decision after Christmas dated 12/13. She wasn't fast in any manner! Because of her, I not only had to give my 8 year old son to his dad to raise. I have a 7 year old son with my husband. My disabilities caused my husband to want a divorce. I had no income yet he kept pushing for me to move out. Abused me in front of our son and even had another family of 4 move in to push me out. I finally ended up at Hope House for 3 months until I got my own one bedroom apartment. During this time, my husband took out a "Order of Child Protection". Even though I won in court, I am being charged the $1300 for the GAL fee! So I lost my home (and he threw everything away!), my son and my husband! I LOST MY FAMILY AND EVERYTHING I OWNED BECAUSE OF HER WRONG DECISION! YES, I AM VERY UPSET WITH HER! I'M JUST GLAD THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM WORK AND PRAY SHE REALIZES THIS TIME HOW WRONG SHE WAS. AND THAT IT DOESN'T TAKE 2 MONTHS TO GET MY DECISION (ARROVAL.) I took my 1st claim to Federal Court (this claim) and my new appeal is 9/2016 with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her. Her approval rate has increased from then, I believe. So hopefully she is being more careful in her decision making process now.
My first hearing with Judge Christina Cooke was on 10/2013. I appealed it August 2012 after the initial denial in 7/2012 (Applied in February or March.) First date in June 2013 was postponed because the Judge couldn't make it. I was late because I have Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (and a ton more.) My husband worked evenings and forgot to set his alarm! We we're 10 minutes late. Made a 45 trip in 20 minutes I think. I finally got my decision after Christmas dated 12/13. She wasn't fast in any manner! Because of her, I not only had to give my 8 year old son to his dad to raise. I have a 7 year old son with my husband. My disabilities caused my husband to want a divorce. I had no income yet he kept pushing for me to move out. Abused me in front of our son and even had another family of 4 move in to push me out. I finally ended up at Hope House for 3 months until I got my own one bedroom apartment. During this time, my husband took out a "Order of Child Protection". Even though I won in court, I am being charged the $1300 for the GAL fee! So I lost my home (and he threw everything away!), my son and my husband! I LOST MY FAMILY AND EVERYTHING I OWNED BECAUSE OF HER WRONG DECISION! YES, I AM VERY UPSET WITH HER! I'M JUST GLAD THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM WORK AND PRAY SHE REALIZES THIS TIME HOW WRONG SHE WAS. AND THAT IT DOESN'T TAKE 2 MONTHS TO GET MY DECISION (ARROVAL.) I took my 1st claim to Federal Court (this claim) and my new appeal is 9/2016 with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her. Her approval rate has increased from then, I believe. So hopefully she is being more careful in her decision making process now.
My first hearing with Judge Christina Cooke was on 10/2013. I appealed it August 2012 after the initial denial in 7/2012 (Applied in February or March.) First date in June 2013 was postponed because the Judge couldn't make it. I was late because I have Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (and a ton more.) My husband worked evenings and forgot to set his alarm! We we're 10 minutes late. Made a 45 trip in 20 minutes I think. I finally got my decision after Christmas dated 12/13. She wasn't fast in any manner! Because of her, I not only had to give my 8 year old son to his dad to raise. I have a 7 year old son with my husband. My disabilities caused my husband to want a divorce. I had no income yet he kept pushing for me to move out. Abused me in front of our son and even had another family of 4 move in to push me out. I finally ended up at Hope House for 3 months until I got my own one bedroom apartment. During this time, my husband took out a "Order of Child Protection". Even though I won in court, I am being charged the $1300 for the GAL fee! So I lost my home (and he threw everything away!), my son and my husband! I LOST MY FAMILY AND EVERYTHING I OWNED BECAUSE OF HER WRONG DECISION! YES, I AM VERY UPSET WITH HER! I'M JUST GLAD THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM WORK AND PRAY SHE REALIZES THIS TIME HOW WRONG SHE WAS. AND THAT IT DOESN'T TAKE 2 MONTHS TO GET MY DECISION (ARROVAL.) I took my 1st claim to Federal Court (this claim) and my new appeal is 9/2016 with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her. Her approval rate has increased from then, I believe. So hopefully she is being more careful in her decision making process now.
I don't understand why people like you are above the law. Absolutely no accountability to anyone. I thought lying was against the law,when done by a law judge. But if you are aloud to bully anyone in your line of work,Iguess lying might also be aloud.
I don't understand why people like you are above the law. Absolutely no accountability to anyone. I thought lying was against the law,when done by a law judge. But if you are aloud to bully anyone in your line of work,Iguess lying might also be aloud.
I don't understand why people like you are above the law. Absolutely no accountability to anyone. I thought lying was against the law,when done by a law judge. But if you are aloud to bully anyone in your line of work,Iguess lying might also be aloud.
Worse judge ever not fair and respectfull case went on for 4 years before hearing still denied wow real what s system we have and a judge
Worse judge ever not fair and respectfull case went on for 4 years before hearing still denied wow real what s system we have and a judge
viagra without a doctor prescription canada buying viagra online viagra canada
viagra without a doctor prescription canada buying viagra online viagra canada
Negative
Negative
Negative
Zero stars
Zero stars
Zero stars
The reason most of my claims are denied is simply PERJURY. All my Medical information is on purposely PERJURED. Not all medical information is PERJURED but my Medical information is. But Judge Dibbles still awarded me full benefits. She was a superwoman. Everybody in a situation like mines need this wonderful and super JUDGE! Thanks you,
The reason most of my claims are denied is simply PERJURY. All my Medical information is on purposely PERJURED. Not all medical information is PERJURED but my Medical information is. But Judge Dibbles still awarded me full benefits. She was a superwoman. Everybody in a situation like mines need this wonderful and super JUDGE! Thanks you,
The reason most of my claims are denied is simply PERJURY. All my Medical information is on purposely PERJURED. Not all medical information is PERJURED but my Medical information is. But Judge Dibbles still awarded me full benefits. She was a superwoman. Everybody in a situation like mines need this wonderful and super JUDGE! Thanks you,
I have not received my decision from Judge Erickson yet, but I have to say I've been through this process before and she was a very pleasant judge to have. In the past I was told it was a waste of time to represent myself, I don't know how it turned out, but she did at least let me speak, and I feel, really listened to me. I was nervous going in, and still shakey going out, but it was not because of Judge Erickson, but rather just nerves. Compared to my last hearing, Judge Erickson was very fair, and pleasant.
I have not received my decision from Judge Erickson yet, but I have to say I've been through this process before and she was a very pleasant judge to have. In the past I was told it was a waste of time to represent myself, I don't know how it turned out, but she did at least let me speak, and I feel, really listened to me. I was nervous going in, and still shakey going out, but it was not because of Judge Erickson, but rather just nerves. Compared to my last hearing, Judge Erickson was very fair, and pleasant.
I have not received my decision from Judge Erickson yet, but I have to say I've been through this process before and she was a very pleasant judge to have. In the past I was told it was a waste of time to represent myself, I don't know how it turned out, but she did at least let me speak, and I feel, really listened to me. I was nervous going in, and still shakey going out, but it was not because of Judge Erickson, but rather just nerves. Compared to my last hearing, Judge Erickson was very fair, and pleasant.
JUDGE DIANA ERICKSON Is a very open-minded, understanding Judge, that is very fair! My second claim appeal went to her for the hearing. I was very nervous because her approval rate was the lowest of all of the other ALJs! My attorneys Parmele and Parmele, requested a decision on review (think that's what it's called.) Basicly asking for her to look at all of the evidence and approve my case, without going to a hearing. The morning of the hearing I get a call from ODAR. I was getting coffee and missed it. I just saw the missed call and knew the office wasn't technically opened and figured it was my attorneys. I called and she asked if it was me and I said yes. She said I'm trying to get ahold of your attorneys, but wanted to let you know that you don't need to come to the hearing today. I didn't understand. She said " I'm not supposed to tell you, but the Judge made a decision on record this morning. Your appeal was approved!" I just started crying and couldn't talk for a minute. Thanked her a billion times and told my ride to turn around and what happened! She changed my life! That was on 1/26/16 and I got my first payment the end of February or beginning of March! I'm took my 1st claim to Federal Court and my new appeal is today at 9am with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her.
JUDGE DIANA ERICKSON Is a very open-minded, understanding Judge, that is very fair! My second claim appeal went to her for the hearing. I was very nervous because her approval rate was the lowest of all of the other ALJs! My attorneys Parmele and Parmele, requested a decision on review (think that's what it's called.) Basicly asking for her to look at all of the evidence and approve my case, without going to a hearing. The morning of the hearing I get a call from ODAR. I was getting coffee and missed it. I just saw the missed call and knew the office wasn't technically opened and figured it was my attorneys. I called and she asked if it was me and I said yes. She said I'm trying to get ahold of your attorneys, but wanted to let you know that you don't need to come to the hearing today. I didn't understand. She said " I'm not supposed to tell you, but the Judge made a decision on record this morning. Your appeal was approved!" I just started crying and couldn't talk for a minute. Thanked her a billion times and told my ride to turn around and what happened! She changed my life! That was on 1/26/16 and I got my first payment the end of February or beginning of March! I'm took my 1st claim to Federal Court and my new appeal is today at 9am with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her.
JUDGE DIANA ERICKSON Is a very open-minded, understanding Judge, that is very fair! My second claim appeal went to her for the hearing. I was very nervous because her approval rate was the lowest of all of the other ALJs! My attorneys Parmele and Parmele, requested a decision on review (think that's what it's called.) Basicly asking for her to look at all of the evidence and approve my case, without going to a hearing. The morning of the hearing I get a call from ODAR. I was getting coffee and missed it. I just saw the missed call and knew the office wasn't technically opened and figured it was my attorneys. I called and she asked if it was me and I said yes. She said I'm trying to get ahold of your attorneys, but wanted to let you know that you don't need to come to the hearing today. I didn't understand. She said " I'm not supposed to tell you, but the Judge made a decision on record this morning. Your appeal was approved!" I just started crying and couldn't talk for a minute. Thanked her a billion times and told my ride to turn around and what happened! She changed my life! That was on 1/26/16 and I got my first payment the end of February or beginning of March! I'm took my 1st claim to Federal Court and my new appeal is today at 9am with Judge Christina Cooke! She was very unfair, and used the oldest information possible and picked and choose what parts she wanted to use. Words direct from the Federal Court when they sent it back for a new hearing as well! She took a medical experts opinion, over my own Rhuemotologist that I had been seeing every 3 months (at minimum) for 2 years, simply because "he encouraged me to exercise to decrease pain!" So I face her with my new attorneys now! Good luck to anyone who has her.
Has some quirks to which one must adjust, but has read the file from beginning to end and is very well prepared to adjudicate.
Has some quirks to which one must adjust, but has read the file from beginning to end and is very well prepared to adjudicate.
Has some quirks to which one must adjust, but has read the file from beginning to end and is very well prepared to adjudicate.
I give him a thumbs down!
I give him a thumbs down!
I give him a thumbs down!
He seemed very nice and was very detailed he was respectful. I just went today so no decision yet. He is sending me for more exrays
He seemed very nice and was very detailed he was respectful. I just went today so no decision yet. He is sending me for more exrays
He seemed very nice and was very detailed he was respectful. I just went today so no decision yet. He is sending me for more exrays
I had my hearing on June 6th with Judge Gillet. I was denied my disability. While I don't agree with his decision, Im not going to post negative remarks towards him. They have a tough job trying to determine who is actually unable to work and those that just want a handout. In addition they have a huge workload. I will appeal my case and hope I can provide enough documentation to prove my disability. Two back surgeries, the last being a lumbar fusion has left me in more pain than before the surgeries and also left me with little flexibility. Can't stand or sit too long. Now I need my tailbone fused due to instability caused by lumbar fusion. I pray and hope my next hearing has a better result. Also have arthritis, hypertension, anxiety disorder etc.
I had my hearing on June 6th with Judge Gillet. I was denied my disability. While I don't agree with his decision, Im not going to post negative remarks towards him. They have a tough job trying to determine who is actually unable to work and those that just want a handout. In addition they have a huge workload. I will appeal my case and hope I can provide enough documentation to prove my disability. Two back surgeries, the last being a lumbar fusion has left me in more pain than before the surgeries and also left me with little flexibility. Can't stand or sit too long. Now I need my tailbone fused due to instability caused by lumbar fusion. I pray and hope my next hearing has a better result. Also have arthritis, hypertension, anxiety disorder etc.
I had my hearing on June 6th with Judge Gillet. I was denied my disability. While I don't agree with his decision, Im not going to post negative remarks towards him. They have a tough job trying to determine who is actually unable to work and those that just want a handout. In addition they have a huge workload. I will appeal my case and hope I can provide enough documentation to prove my disability. Two back surgeries, the last being a lumbar fusion has left me in more pain than before the surgeries and also left me with little flexibility. Can't stand or sit too long. Now I need my tailbone fused due to instability caused by lumbar fusion. I pray and hope my next hearing has a better result. Also have arthritis, hypertension, anxiety disorder etc.
Had my hearing on June 8th, & just got my denial letter. Very frustrating! Cannot work any longer due to back problems. Judge Gillet & all disability judges have a huge workload and I have a lot of respect for them. So I am not, nor would I ever, going to criticize him for his dicision. I will appeal & hope for the best, as I desperately need my benefits!!!!!
Had my hearing on June 8th, & just got my denial letter. Very frustrating! Cannot work any longer due to back problems. Judge Gillet & all disability judges have a huge workload and I have a lot of respect for them. So I am not, nor would I ever, going to criticize him for his dicision. I will appeal & hope for the best, as I desperately need my benefits!!!!!
Had my hearing on June 8th, & just got my denial letter. Very frustrating! Cannot work any longer due to back problems. Judge Gillet & all disability judges have a huge workload and I have a lot of respect for them. So I am not, nor would I ever, going to criticize him for his dicision. I will appeal & hope for the best, as I desperately need my benefits!!!!!
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He doesn't want people on pain medication. And people there are alternatives believe it or not I thought I would be on narcotics for the rest of my life but I put them down and tried some alternatives and the non narcotic meds I'm on work just as good as the opiates did without all the side effects. So the judge is right unless your dying try a non narcotic solution it may help nothing takes away my pain more than 50℅ but so the non narcotic meds I'm taking are as good. Sure was hell to get off that crap though my kids were my inspiration they will never see me look like that again I don't care if I'm dying from pain I won't take them again. I would rather suffer day in day out than take that soul sucking crap again so I'll just go on suffering. Truth is I was suffering when I was taking the strong narcotics cause my body got used to them. Truthfully people if your on those types of meds you know I'm telling the truth. They stop working and then you go up and up and up and up I don't think there is a end to the tolerance for opiates so you can keep taking them and end up a total mud pie or you can tolerate pain and find what helps the best try indomethacin it's been helpful and then you can try 800mg ibprofin take 1600mg 4 times a day and it helps folks
He was very respectful. When he asked me question he let me explain it all. I have severe depression n anger issues much less all my health issues. He was kind about it all. I hear he made a decision on the 5th of july now just waiting to see what his responce was. Vocational Lady said no jobs for me. I do have alot of anger issues working with people. When i get mad i snap
He was very respectful. When he asked me question he let me explain it all. I have severe depression n anger issues much less all my health issues. He was kind about it all. I hear he made a decision on the 5th of july now just waiting to see what his responce was. Vocational Lady said no jobs for me. I do have alot of anger issues working with people. When i get mad i snap
He was very respectful. When he asked me question he let me explain it all. I have severe depression n anger issues much less all my health issues. He was kind about it all. I hear he made a decision on the 5th of july now just waiting to see what his responce was. Vocational Lady said no jobs for me. I do have alot of anger issues working with people. When i get mad i snap
Im very disappointed in the decision especially since in court vocational lady said no jobs for me n judge said i cant work with others and the deny me my benefits. Im being evicted to the streets with my 2 dogs to survive on the streets. Im hopeing my lawyer appeals it. Cause i cant do this on the streets in mo where its to cold or its to hot or rains alot
Im very disappointed in the decision especially since in court vocational lady said no jobs for me n judge said i cant work with others and the deny me my benefits. Im being evicted to the streets with my 2 dogs to survive on the streets. Im hopeing my lawyer appeals it. Cause i cant do this on the streets in mo where its to cold or its to hot or rains alot
Im very disappointed in the decision especially since in court vocational lady said no jobs for me n judge said i cant work with others and the deny me my benefits. Im being evicted to the streets with my 2 dogs to survive on the streets. Im hopeing my lawyer appeals it. Cause i cant do this on the streets in mo where its to cold or its to hot or rains alot
Sonya Collins, the same situation with me. The Vocational Expert said there was no jobs in the national economy that I could do either, about a years or a little over I got a Denial Letter, I eventually got SSI and screwed out of several years of backpay and they did not deposit my October benefit because a insurance company took their sweet time sending the information they (SSA) requested from me, and SSA clearly stated that they would help me get that information and for 8 months failed t do and I sent them the contact information!
Sonya Collins, the same situation with me. The Vocational Expert said there was no jobs in the national economy that I could do either, about a years or a little over I got a Denial Letter, I eventually got SSI and screwed out of several years of backpay and they did not deposit my October benefit because a insurance company took their sweet time sending the information they (SSA) requested from me, and SSA clearly stated that they would help me get that information and for 8 months failed t do and I sent them the contact information!
Hear is what I would like to know, Did any of your attorneys met before the hearing & after the hearing with the judge? Mine did at both hearings and I thought that to be odd, and I had the right to know what was said.
I believe Judge Gulick is fair. I know he looked at all of the facts to base his decision.
I believe Judge Gulick is fair. I know he looked at all of the facts to base his decision.
I believe Judge Gulick is fair. I know he looked at all of the facts to base his decision.
viagra 100mg price viagra without a doctor prescription viagra 100mg price
viagra 100mg price viagra without a doctor prescription viagra 100mg price
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know eric_monte2001@yahoo.com!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know eric_monte2001@yahoo.com!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know eric_monte2001@yahoo.com!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
This guy smiled the whole time at the hearing and said when you get your money do something nice 2 months later it was denied and our attorney found legal errors and it was sent to appeals council we won have new hearing jan 2016 but different judge
This guy smiled the whole time at the hearing and said when you get your money do something nice 2 months later it was denied and our attorney found legal errors and it was sent to appeals council we won have new hearing jan 2016 but different judge
This guy smiled the whole time at the hearing and said when you get your money do something nice 2 months later it was denied and our attorney found legal errors and it was sent to appeals council we won have new hearing jan 2016 but different judge
online viagra viagra without a doctor prescription order viagra online
online viagra viagra without a doctor prescription order viagra online
has anyone had a favorable experience with judge jung? did he permanently transfer to the kansas city office?
has anyone had a favorable experience with judge jung? did he permanently transfer to the kansas city office?
has anyone had a favorable experience with judge jung? did he permanently transfer to the kansas city office?
judge jung is fair
judge jung is fair
judge jung is fair
he is terrible judge did not consider all evidence and violated so many of my rights not allowing evidence submitted disregarding dr diagnosis and made a decision based on proven false acusations from the state therefor he is bias I have decieded its best to file a complaint with Office of Quality Performance and Review
he is terrible judge did not consider all evidence and violated so many of my rights not allowing evidence submitted disregarding dr diagnosis and made a decision based on proven false acusations from the state therefor he is bias I have decieded its best to file a complaint with Office of Quality Performance and Review
he is terrible judge did not consider all evidence and violated so many of my rights not allowing evidence submitted disregarding dr diagnosis and made a decision based on proven false acusations from the state therefor he is bias I have decieded its best to file a complaint with Office of Quality Performance and Review
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
Didn't do his job he's a liberal phony made up his mind on crooked Info from state appt shrink who gave me 15 min interview totally unfair racist ***** wished I had recording of hearing to release to all he should be removed from his duties and join the Clinton's whom he admires so much
I was shocked and extreme angry with Peter jung in KCMO. Social security admitted they purposely threw away numerous files(boxes). He ruled for the state where I was granted a waiver, from 1996. had all of my information on my part. He ignored waiver, as well as ruling on missing files that social security disposed of , giving me unfavorable decision and now I owe $5466.00. that I cannot pay back as I am fighting a disease there is no cure for, eventually fatal. Did not care. Also blamed me for not having counsel, but at first meeting, stated I did not need one. Heartless, ignored numerous amount of destroyed files by soc security that would have proven my case. Also ignored statement from soc sec, they were simply estimating. No law or Justice in his courtroom..
I was shocked and extreme angry with Peter jung in KCMO. Social security admitted they purposely threw away numerous files(boxes). He ruled for the state where I was granted a waiver, from 1996. had all of my information on my part. He ignored waiver, as well as ruling on missing files that social security disposed of , giving me unfavorable decision and now I owe $5466.00. that I cannot pay back as I am fighting a disease there is no cure for, eventually fatal. Did not care. Also blamed me for not having counsel, but at first meeting, stated I did not need one. Heartless, ignored numerous amount of destroyed files by soc security that would have proven my case. Also ignored statement from soc sec, they were simply estimating. No law or Justice in his courtroom..
I was shocked and extreme angry with Peter jung in KCMO. Social security admitted they purposely threw away numerous files(boxes). He ruled for the state where I was granted a waiver, from 1996. had all of my information on my part. He ignored waiver, as well as ruling on missing files that social security disposed of , giving me unfavorable decision and now I owe $5466.00. that I cannot pay back as I am fighting a disease there is no cure for, eventually fatal. Did not care. Also blamed me for not having counsel, but at first meeting, stated I did not need one. Heartless, ignored numerous amount of destroyed files by soc security that would have proven my case. Also ignored statement from soc sec, they were simply estimating. No law or Justice in his courtroom..
Great judge! Fair and understandable. I approve!
Great judge! Fair and understandable. I approve!
Great judge! Fair and understandable. I approve!
Just because I'm black doesn't mean you have to be racist
Just because I'm black doesn't mean you have to be racist
Just because I'm black doesn't mean you have to be racist
It is disheartening to know that a Administrative Judge as accidentally or deliberately incompetent as Robert A. Kelly is allowed to serve in that capacity. My justification for this opinion is backed by the following facts of my case: 1) Mr. Kelly ignored testimony by a vocational expert employed by the SSA that would require a ruling in my favor according to 20 CFR Part 404.1520 (g). 2) Mr. Kelly ignored evidence that supports a disabled status determination according to 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1. 3) Mr. Kelly ignored reputable medical test results, and claimed there were none. 4) Mr. Kelly ignored diagnoses by a reputable medical specialist, and substituted his own. 5) Mr. Kelly didn’t bother to learn my case and personal history and drew erroneous conclusions as a result. 6) Mr. Kelly used a personal interpretation of SSA rules to omit material that was submitted on time and that would have further supported my case. Avoid a hearing by Mr. Kelly if you can.
It is disheartening to know that a Administrative Judge as accidentally or deliberately incompetent as Robert A. Kelly is allowed to serve in that capacity. My justification for this opinion is backed by the following facts of my case: 1) Mr. Kelly ignored testimony by a vocational expert employed by the SSA that would require a ruling in my favor according to 20 CFR Part 404.1520 (g). 2) Mr. Kelly ignored evidence that supports a disabled status determination according to 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1. 3) Mr. Kelly ignored reputable medical test results, and claimed there were none. 4) Mr. Kelly ignored diagnoses by a reputable medical specialist, and substituted his own. 5) Mr. Kelly didn’t bother to learn my case and personal history and drew erroneous conclusions as a result. 6) Mr. Kelly used a personal interpretation of SSA rules to omit material that was submitted on time and that would have further supported my case. Avoid a hearing by Mr. Kelly if you can.
It is disheartening to know that a Administrative Judge as accidentally or deliberately incompetent as Robert A. Kelly is allowed to serve in that capacity. My justification for this opinion is backed by the following facts of my case: 1) Mr. Kelly ignored testimony by a vocational expert employed by the SSA that would require a ruling in my favor according to 20 CFR Part 404.1520 (g). 2) Mr. Kelly ignored evidence that supports a disabled status determination according to 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1. 3) Mr. Kelly ignored reputable medical test results, and claimed there were none. 4) Mr. Kelly ignored diagnoses by a reputable medical specialist, and substituted his own. 5) Mr. Kelly didn’t bother to learn my case and personal history and drew erroneous conclusions as a result. 6) Mr. Kelly used a personal interpretation of SSA rules to omit material that was submitted on time and that would have further supported my case. Avoid a hearing by Mr. Kelly if you can.
How much evidence one will need when they all repeat and say the same things. Would rather not deal with him.
How much evidence one will need when they all repeat and say the same things. Would rather not deal with him.
How much evidence one will need when they all repeat and say the same things. Would rather not deal with him.
Don't know how much evidence one will need for this guy to approve you! Rather not deal with this guy!
Don't know how much evidence one will need for this guy to approve you! Rather not deal with this guy!
Don't know how much evidence one will need for this guy to approve you! Rather not deal with this guy!
High denial rate! Be a more understanding! Be willing to listen, look at providing and approving evidence and just approve when it should be! Don't add more stress and anxiety to claimants! Soften your heart!
High denial rate! Be a more understanding! Be willing to listen, look at providing and approving evidence and just approve when it should be! Don't add more stress and anxiety to claimants! Soften your heart!
High denial rate! Be a more understanding! Be willing to listen, look at providing and approving evidence and just approve when it should be! Don't add more stress and anxiety to claimants! Soften your heart!
viagra cost per pill buy cheap viagra generic viagra walmart
viagra cost per pill buy cheap viagra generic viagra walmart
Best judge ever, fair, tough, doesnt put up with BS, but has a heart.
Best judge ever, fair, tough, doesnt put up with BS, but has a heart.
Best judge ever, fair, tough, doesnt put up with BS, but has a heart.
i think he should have to live with some of these that are denied because he doesnt see enough evidence wellwhen you live with someone 33 yrs and they complain of the pain and they have no insurance to seek medical because medicaid denies them because not proven be disabled especially when you see so many getting ssi because they have mental problems well to some exinct i feel i have mental stress from my spouse fighting to get his disabilty he worked for it seems more get ssi than those who actually worked and the stress of worrying how care for children and bills and shopping because your spouse isnt capable to help you out but then a judge says not enough evidence i dont really know who is hiring anyone walking in with a cane for support but my opion is look more into what is really said not what you think they said and when did a fishing trip with your son make you not diasbled because i see a man with one leg in a wheel chair fishing daily i see a sqezo prantic deer hunting gambling in a casino but bi polar and cant be around a group people but they are in wal mart they are in gambling and my spouse cant stand in walmart longer about thirty min he in pain and in the car with the seat laid back just saying how you pick and chose
i think he should have to live with some of these that are denied because he doesnt see enough evidence wellwhen you live with someone 33 yrs and they complain of the pain and they have no insurance to seek medical because medicaid denies them because not proven be disabled especially when you see so many getting ssi because they have mental problems well to some exinct i feel i have mental stress from my spouse fighting to get his disabilty he worked for it seems more get ssi than those who actually worked and the stress of worrying how care for children and bills and shopping because your spouse isnt capable to help you out but then a judge says not enough evidence i dont really know who is hiring anyone walking in with a cane for support but my opion is look more into what is really said not what you think they said and when did a fishing trip with your son make you not diasbled because i see a man with one leg in a wheel chair fishing daily i see a sqezo prantic deer hunting gambling in a casino but bi polar and cant be around a group people but they are in wal mart they are in gambling and my spouse cant stand in walmart longer about thirty min he in pain and in the car with the seat laid back just saying how you pick and chose
i think he should have to live with some of these that are denied because he doesnt see enough evidence wellwhen you live with someone 33 yrs and they complain of the pain and they have no insurance to seek medical because medicaid denies them because not proven be disabled especially when you see so many getting ssi because they have mental problems well to some exinct i feel i have mental stress from my spouse fighting to get his disabilty he worked for it seems more get ssi than those who actually worked and the stress of worrying how care for children and bills and shopping because your spouse isnt capable to help you out but then a judge says not enough evidence i dont really know who is hiring anyone walking in with a cane for support but my opion is look more into what is really said not what you think they said and when did a fishing trip with your son make you not diasbled because i see a man with one leg in a wheel chair fishing daily i see a sqezo prantic deer hunting gambling in a casino but bi polar and cant be around a group people but they are in wal mart they are in gambling and my spouse cant stand in walmart longer about thirty min he in pain and in the car with the seat laid back just saying how you pick and chose
Very professional and efficient.
Very professional and efficient.
Very professional and efficient.
June 26, 2016 IM TIRED OF THE BULLIES AT SSA (SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) WE PAY INTO SSA BUT WHEN WE NEED OUR MONEY WE CAN’T GET IT WITHOUT HIRING An ATTORNEY. SSA STAFF ARE RUDE AND ABUSIVE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM. WHAT HAPPEN TO OUR RIGHTS AND HONESTY? WHY ARE WE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DISFUNCTIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY DISIBILITY BENIFITS WITHOUT BEING FORCEDTO HIRE An ATTORNEY? LETS CONTACT CONGRESSMAN SAM JOHNSON A THE REST OF THE CROOKS ON THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. SAM JOHNSON IS THE CHAIR FOR SUBCOMMITTEE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY ADMINISTRATON. HE LIVES IN PLANO, TEXAS AND HE BELIEVES HE IS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. SINCE HE IS UP FOR REETION AD IS RUNNING UN APPOSED. SAM JOHNSONS STAFF WAS DISMISSIVE SINCE HE IS RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION UNAPPOSED S O HE AN SSA ARE NOT BEING HONEST. SSA DENIES EVERY CLAIM DISPITE YOU DISABILITY AND NOONE HOLDS THEM ACCOUNTABLE. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS AND CAROLYN COLVEN NEVER EVEN RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION. SO, CALL, TEXT, E-MAIL, USE TALK RADIO TO GIVE THESE CORRUPT POLITICAINS ON THE WAYS COMMITTEE AND ASK THEM ABOUT THERE COLLEAGUE SAM JOHNSON AND ASK WHY IS SSA SO DISFUNCTIONAL, ABUSE, AND DISHONEST!!! WRITE OR CALL THESE POLITICIANS WHO WANT AMERICAN TO FAIL! Sam Johnson, Texas, Chairman (UP FOR RE-ELECTION…RUNNING UN APPOSSED!) 3rd district • Bob Dold, Illinois • Vern Buchanan, Florida • Adrian Smith, Nebraska • Mike Kelly, Pennsylvania • Jim Renacci, Ohio • Tom Rice, South Carolina • Xavier Becerra, California, Ranking Member • Lloyd Doggett, Texas • John B. Larson, Connecticut • Earl Blumenauer, Oregon SINCERLY MIKEB.
June 26, 2016 IM TIRED OF THE BULLIES AT SSA (SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) WE PAY INTO SSA BUT WHEN WE NEED OUR MONEY WE CAN’T GET IT WITHOUT HIRING An ATTORNEY. SSA STAFF ARE RUDE AND ABUSIVE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM. WHAT HAPPEN TO OUR RIGHTS AND HONESTY? WHY ARE WE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DISFUNCTIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY DISIBILITY BENIFITS WITHOUT BEING FORCEDTO HIRE An ATTORNEY? LETS CONTACT CONGRESSMAN SAM JOHNSON A THE REST OF THE CROOKS ON THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. SAM JOHNSON IS THE CHAIR FOR SUBCOMMITTEE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY ADMINISTRATON. HE LIVES IN PLANO, TEXAS AND HE BELIEVES HE IS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. SINCE HE IS UP FOR REETION AD IS RUNNING UN APPOSED. SAM JOHNSONS STAFF WAS DISMISSIVE SINCE HE IS RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION UNAPPOSED S O HE AN SSA ARE NOT BEING HONEST. SSA DENIES EVERY CLAIM DISPITE YOU DISABILITY AND NOONE HOLDS THEM ACCOUNTABLE. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS AND CAROLYN COLVEN NEVER EVEN RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION. SO, CALL, TEXT, E-MAIL, USE TALK RADIO TO GIVE THESE CORRUPT POLITICAINS ON THE WAYS COMMITTEE AND ASK THEM ABOUT THERE COLLEAGUE SAM JOHNSON AND ASK WHY IS SSA SO DISFUNCTIONAL, ABUSE, AND DISHONEST!!! WRITE OR CALL THESE POLITICIANS WHO WANT AMERICAN TO FAIL! Sam Johnson, Texas, Chairman (UP FOR RE-ELECTION…RUNNING UN APPOSSED!) 3rd district • Bob Dold, Illinois • Vern Buchanan, Florida • Adrian Smith, Nebraska • Mike Kelly, Pennsylvania • Jim Renacci, Ohio • Tom Rice, South Carolina • Xavier Becerra, California, Ranking Member • Lloyd Doggett, Texas • John B. Larson, Connecticut • Earl Blumenauer, Oregon SINCERLY MIKEB.
June 26, 2016 IM TIRED OF THE BULLIES AT SSA (SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) WE PAY INTO SSA BUT WHEN WE NEED OUR MONEY WE CAN’T GET IT WITHOUT HIRING An ATTORNEY. SSA STAFF ARE RUDE AND ABUSIVE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM. WHAT HAPPEN TO OUR RIGHTS AND HONESTY? WHY ARE WE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DISFUNCTIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY DISIBILITY BENIFITS WITHOUT BEING FORCEDTO HIRE An ATTORNEY? LETS CONTACT CONGRESSMAN SAM JOHNSON A THE REST OF THE CROOKS ON THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. SAM JOHNSON IS THE CHAIR FOR SUBCOMMITTEE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY ADMINISTRATON. HE LIVES IN PLANO, TEXAS AND HE BELIEVES HE IS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. SINCE HE IS UP FOR REETION AD IS RUNNING UN APPOSED. SAM JOHNSONS STAFF WAS DISMISSIVE SINCE HE IS RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION UNAPPOSED S O HE AN SSA ARE NOT BEING HONEST. SSA DENIES EVERY CLAIM DISPITE YOU DISABILITY AND NOONE HOLDS THEM ACCOUNTABLE. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS AND CAROLYN COLVEN NEVER EVEN RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION. SO, CALL, TEXT, E-MAIL, USE TALK RADIO TO GIVE THESE CORRUPT POLITICAINS ON THE WAYS COMMITTEE AND ASK THEM ABOUT THERE COLLEAGUE SAM JOHNSON AND ASK WHY IS SSA SO DISFUNCTIONAL, ABUSE, AND DISHONEST!!! WRITE OR CALL THESE POLITICIANS WHO WANT AMERICAN TO FAIL! Sam Johnson, Texas, Chairman (UP FOR RE-ELECTION…RUNNING UN APPOSSED!) 3rd district • Bob Dold, Illinois • Vern Buchanan, Florida • Adrian Smith, Nebraska • Mike Kelly, Pennsylvania • Jim Renacci, Ohio • Tom Rice, South Carolina • Xavier Becerra, California, Ranking Member • Lloyd Doggett, Texas • John B. Larson, Connecticut • Earl Blumenauer, Oregon SINCERLY MIKEB.
Judge Lehr was very professional in the courtroom as I had my hearing using a television. Judge Lehr did not ask me any questions as he lead it up to my attorney to ask the questions. The reason I am giving Judge Lehr a 1 star rating is because after receiving my unfavorable decision I was reading through what Judge Lehr had said why he gave me the unfavorable decision and most of what he had said was not true and my words was twisted on what I said in the courtroom. For example, Judge Lehr said I said in the courtroom that I walk my dog and bath and feed my dog. What I actually said was I let my dog out during the day while my husband is at work so he can use the bathroom. Not once did I say I feed and bathe my dog!! My words was twisted so much that I am highly livid! Please be aware of this judge as he will twist your words. Another example I was denied is because I have been in a relationship with my husband since 2016. He said if I can live with someone then I can work! Wow this Judge really needs to work on himself!
Judge Lehr was very professional in the courtroom as I had my hearing using a television. Judge Lehr did not ask me any questions as he lead it up to my attorney to ask the questions. The reason I am giving Judge Lehr a 1 star rating is because after receiving my unfavorable decision I was reading through what Judge Lehr had said why he gave me the unfavorable decision and most of what he had said was not true and my words was twisted on what I said in the courtroom. For example, Judge Lehr said I said in the courtroom that I walk my dog and bath and feed my dog. What I actually said was I let my dog out during the day while my husband is at work so he can use the bathroom. Not once did I say I feed and bathe my dog!! My words was twisted so much that I am highly livid! Please be aware of this judge as he will twist your words. Another example I was denied is because I have been in a relationship with my husband since 2016. He said if I can live with someone then I can work! Wow this Judge really needs to work on himself!
Judge Lehr was very professional in the courtroom as I had my hearing using a television. Judge Lehr did not ask me any questions as he lead it up to my attorney to ask the questions. The reason I am giving Judge Lehr a 1 star rating is because after receiving my unfavorable decision I was reading through what Judge Lehr had said why he gave me the unfavorable decision and most of what he had said was not true and my words was twisted on what I said in the courtroom. For example, Judge Lehr said I said in the courtroom that I walk my dog and bath and feed my dog. What I actually said was I let my dog out during the day while my husband is at work so he can use the bathroom. Not once did I say I feed and bathe my dog!! My words was twisted so much that I am highly livid! Please be aware of this judge as he will twist your words. Another example I was denied is because I have been in a relationship with my husband since 2016. He said if I can live with someone then I can work! Wow this Judge really needs to work on himself!
Very professional and efficient.
Very professional and efficient.
Very professional and efficient.
I met Judge McCarty at Judge Keltch's funeral in Oklahoma. He was very approachable and warm. Had nice things to say about Judge Keltch. Judge McCarty said Judge Keltch was his mentor when he started working at SSA.
I met Judge McCarty at Judge Keltch's funeral in Oklahoma. He was very approachable and warm. Had nice things to say about Judge Keltch. Judge McCarty said Judge Keltch was his mentor when he started working at SSA.
I met Judge McCarty at Judge Keltch's funeral in Oklahoma. He was very approachable and warm. Had nice things to say about Judge Keltch. Judge McCarty said Judge Keltch was his mentor when he started working at SSA.
His record speaks for itself far more denials than the national average that means people that are in dire straits and are in desperate need of the Social Security benefits that they have paid in their entire lives through working, and now need them, not want them but need them get disenfranchised not only by the Social Security Administration moreover Jack D. McCarthy. I am disgusted truly disgusted this man, in combination with mouth practicing attorneys get away with unthinkable ask causing people to go into excessive depressive states. And even know this was explained to Jack McCarthy as well as the attorneys that were hired no care was given to the individual, no concern for their well-being and now they are living frayed ends of sanity. This man should not be a judge, not even in the kangaroo court which I'm convinced he runs. I'm disgusted.
His record speaks for itself far more denials than the national average that means people that are in dire straits and are in desperate need of the Social Security benefits that they have paid in their entire lives through working, and now need them, not want them but need them get disenfranchised not only by the Social Security Administration moreover Jack D. McCarthy. I am disgusted truly disgusted this man, in combination with mouth practicing attorneys get away with unthinkable ask causing people to go into excessive depressive states. And even know this was explained to Jack McCarthy as well as the attorneys that were hired no care was given to the individual, no concern for their well-being and now they are living frayed ends of sanity. This man should not be a judge, not even in the kangaroo court which I'm convinced he runs. I'm disgusted.
His record speaks for itself far more denials than the national average that means people that are in dire straits and are in desperate need of the Social Security benefits that they have paid in their entire lives through working, and now need them, not want them but need them get disenfranchised not only by the Social Security Administration moreover Jack D. McCarthy. I am disgusted truly disgusted this man, in combination with mouth practicing attorneys get away with unthinkable ask causing people to go into excessive depressive states. And even know this was explained to Jack McCarthy as well as the attorneys that were hired no care was given to the individual, no concern for their well-being and now they are living frayed ends of sanity. This man should not be a judge, not even in the kangaroo court which I'm convinced he runs. I'm disgusted.
Normally takes any where from 90 to 120 days from the date of your hearing to hear back from the judge. It's been way over that period and still have not heard a decision. How much longer need to know what my next step is in life.
Normally takes any where from 90 to 120 days from the date of your hearing to hear back from the judge. It's been way over that period and still have not heard a decision. How much longer need to know what my next step is in life.
Normally takes any where from 90 to 120 days from the date of your hearing to hear back from the judge. It's been way over that period and still have not heard a decision. How much longer need to know what my next step is in life.
Had hearing April 4th and here it is Sept going into Oct going on 7 months after hearing and still no response from the judge very frustrating to deal with my exiety has been threw the roof cause I was told I would hear from the judge in 60 to 90 days and have not
Had hearing April 4th and here it is Sept going into Oct going on 7 months after hearing and still no response from the judge very frustrating to deal with my exiety has been threw the roof cause I was told I would hear from the judge in 60 to 90 days and have not
Had hearing April 4th and here it is Sept going into Oct going on 7 months after hearing and still no response from the judge very frustrating to deal with my exiety has been threw the roof cause I was told I would hear from the judge in 60 to 90 days and have not
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
Very disappointed with the location and ALJ Jack D. McCarthy. My hearing was 4-4-2018 at the Kansas City Office Of Disability Adjudication and Review building, Was told from everyone there plus my representative that I will be getting ALJ Jack D. McCarthy decision in the mail within 60 to 90 days. I thought cool almost completely finished with everything. So on 7-4-2018 2 days before and a week after the 4th of July I kept an eye on the mailbox. And today's date is December 17, 2018 and still keeping an eye on mailbox but ALJ Jack D McCarthy still has not made a decision on my case. I guess that's why he gets paid $175,100. A year as long as he is collecting a check like that ***** us little guys that sit I sever pain that not even pain pills can relieve about to be kicked out of where I am staying because this has dragged out this long so me and my 2 kids have to live out on the streets homeless. ALJ Jack D McCarthy will never have to experience any of what I'm going threw nor being homeless. God will judge you for what I am going threw cause you want to take sooooo long toake a decision.
A sorry excuse for a judge. To get approved you must be on your death bed. Does she ever take a day off for being sick? If so, how hypicritical can she be? If she had some kind of surgery, would she take time off? Of course she would. If she had the disabilities that some of the cases she heard, she would commit suicide. But she denies them. For any aches or pains that she has, go to work like you expect everyone else to do.
A sorry excuse for a judge. To get approved you must be on your death bed. Does she ever take a day off for being sick? If so, how hypicritical can she be? If she had some kind of surgery, would she take time off? Of course she would. If she had the disabilities that some of the cases she heard, she would commit suicide. But she denies them. For any aches or pains that she has, go to work like you expect everyone else to do.
A sorry excuse for a judge. To get approved you must be on your death bed. Does she ever take a day off for being sick? If so, how hypicritical can she be? If she had some kind of surgery, would she take time off? Of course she would. If she had the disabilities that some of the cases she heard, she would commit suicide. But she denies them. For any aches or pains that she has, go to work like you expect everyone else to do.
Another young judge who doesn't get it.
Another young judge who doesn't get it.
Another young judge who doesn't get it.
Very respectful and understanding. Professional.
Very respectful and understanding. Professional.
Very respectful and understanding. Professional.
Don't include me in you lowest approvel and highest denial stats! Base your decision on medical facts and not whatever way you have been doing it PLEASE, back disorders are real! and for some much more dibilitating than others. When I read your stats I instantly thought all this time and pain and this is what I'm gunna get??
Don't include me in you lowest approvel and highest denial stats! Base your decision on medical facts and not whatever way you have been doing it PLEASE, back disorders are real! and for some much more dibilitating than others. When I read your stats I instantly thought all this time and pain and this is what I'm gunna get??
Don't include me in you lowest approvel and highest denial stats! Base your decision on medical facts and not whatever way you have been doing it PLEASE, back disorders are real! and for some much more dibilitating than others. When I read your stats I instantly thought all this time and pain and this is what I'm gunna get??
I'm praying that jesus reveals to your heart who I am and you are able to decern through records and truth how much pain I have and how I can't do anywork due to my conditions. The lord has chose not to heal me for his higher purposes and I except that. But I believe I will not be denied at hearing and to him be ALL the praise and glory! Amen
I'm praying that jesus reveals to your heart who I am and you are able to decern through records and truth how much pain I have and how I can't do anywork due to my conditions. The lord has chose not to heal me for his higher purposes and I except that. But I believe I will not be denied at hearing and to him be ALL the praise and glory! Amen
I'm praying that jesus reveals to your heart who I am and you are able to decern through records and truth how much pain I have and how I can't do anywork due to my conditions. The lord has chose not to heal me for his higher purposes and I except that. But I believe I will not be denied at hearing and to him be ALL the praise and glory! Amen
Very pleasant Judge. I applied for SSDI in May 2013 denied in July 15 2013 and appealed the decision July 15 2013. Hearing date was November 17 2014. Fully favorable Decison on December 8 2014. I'm only 39 years old and have severe DDD in lower lumbar. My attorney had all my evidence together like MRI ,X-rays and notes and RFC from my orthopedic surgeon. Good luck to everyone cause it is tough and a long wait. But Judge Mein was very nice and seemed very sincere about what I had to say and she was great. Thank you.
Very pleasant Judge. I applied for SSDI in May 2013 denied in July 15 2013 and appealed the decision July 15 2013. Hearing date was November 17 2014. Fully favorable Decison on December 8 2014. I'm only 39 years old and have severe DDD in lower lumbar. My attorney had all my evidence together like MRI ,X-rays and notes and RFC from my orthopedic surgeon. Good luck to everyone cause it is tough and a long wait. But Judge Mein was very nice and seemed very sincere about what I had to say and she was great. Thank you.
Very pleasant Judge. I applied for SSDI in May 2013 denied in July 15 2013 and appealed the decision July 15 2013. Hearing date was November 17 2014. Fully favorable Decison on December 8 2014. I'm only 39 years old and have severe DDD in lower lumbar. My attorney had all my evidence together like MRI ,X-rays and notes and RFC from my orthopedic surgeon. Good luck to everyone cause it is tough and a long wait. But Judge Mein was very nice and seemed very sincere about what I had to say and she was great. Thank you.
Great judge Either way my decision goes I was very impressed with her, she listens is smart and cares about the situation. Glad she is there
Great judge Either way my decision goes I was very impressed with her, she listens is smart and cares about the situation. Glad she is there
Great judge Either way my decision goes I was very impressed with her, she listens is smart and cares about the situation. Glad she is there
I am writing this for my husband who is completely distraught after we read his decision and I am beside myself. I should be clear since she assumed he authored certain well written cogent letters to doctors when in fact I had to and he signed I've been his POA for two years. I've been to all his therapy and Dr appointments he has in the last several years had 6-7 Dr's cardiologist neurologist neorosurgeons primary dr phsycogist psychiatrist ambulatory, therapists and I've lived with him for years. He's had so much testing and blood drawing every 3 months and MRI's X-rays psych evaluations. Btw I should note I am also an HR expert with over 16 years real world experience and degrees and certifications so I know a thing or two about disabilities job hiring types of jobs policy relating to breaks and limitations and all that governs it. They should live with him before they decide to make uneducated and incredibly dubious comments, assumptions, and claims. He Never met a more two face dishonest person and I agree after what I read and know to be true. She has her own agenda clearly either that or I'd have to question her competence on disabilities and disability law. She threw out Social Securities own Dr's evaluation and said he wasn't credible. She claimed his Reg dr wasn't credible because he didn't list all his conditions even though the records reflected them and details which her personal dr said should be in his records based on testing and because he didn't have him on a higher dose of Oxycodone consistent with his physical conditions and medical records. She then said his psychiatrists wasn't credible because her diagnosis and limitations were only her medical opinion, even though they were supported with extensive testing and records. The judge added more conditions and limitations beyond what My husband had initially and the vocational expert said some weren't even in the manual so she wasn't even sure He could do the non skilled 3 jobs she selected from nation wide which were only 20,30 and 50 thousand jobs nationwide. She went on to add more limitations in the decision. The jobs all but one existed mostly in reality as a duty within other duties for a office job title like document scanner almost everywhere no matter your job one of your additional duties is to scan your own documents. Almost no one hires a "document scanner" circuit boards mostly are made in China, packers mostly ups or fed ex or a company like amazone where he can't have the limitations imposed. She claimed no foot peddles no in an out of hot or cold no bending stopping crouching crawling lifting no real thought or decision making. Little interaction with co workers or supervisors. There's not a job in the world that allows those limitations. She didn't tell the whole truth as reflected by the record about explained actions that when in school He was a slow learner and needed help and graduated a year later yet she said he graduated so it was a sign of lack of disability. She claimed because he attempted to cut our 15X15 ft yard with a self propelled mower he wasn't disabled yet it was explained in hearing and in my letter he had to take many breaks and I had to help finish she could ask the neighbors for Christ sake. She claimed I the wife was not credible when she never met me and had no information on me other than what I Privately wrote to her about his symptoms conditions and limitations which were 100% true.
I am writing this for my husband who is completely distraught after we read his decision and I am beside myself. I should be clear since she assumed he authored certain well written cogent letters to doctors when in fact I had to and he signed I've been his POA for two years. I've been to all his therapy and Dr appointments he has in the last several years had 6-7 Dr's cardiologist neurologist neorosurgeons primary dr phsycogist psychiatrist ambulatory, therapists and I've lived with him for years. He's had so much testing and blood drawing every 3 months and MRI's X-rays psych evaluations. Btw I should note I am also an HR expert with over 16 years real world experience and degrees and certifications so I know a thing or two about disabilities job hiring types of jobs policy relating to breaks and limitations and all that governs it. They should live with him before they decide to make uneducated and incredibly dubious comments, assumptions, and claims. He Never met a more two face dishonest person and I agree after what I read and know to be true. She has her own agenda clearly either that or I'd have to question her competence on disabilities and disability law. She threw out Social Securities own Dr's evaluation and said he wasn't credible. She claimed his Reg dr wasn't credible because he didn't list all his conditions even though the records reflected them and details which her personal dr said should be in his records based on testing and because he didn't have him on a higher dose of Oxycodone consistent with his physical conditions and medical records. She then said his psychiatrists wasn't credible because her diagnosis and limitations were only her medical opinion, even though they were supported with extensive testing and records. The judge added more conditions and limitations beyond what My husband had initially and the vocational expert said some weren't even in the manual so she wasn't even sure He could do the non skilled 3 jobs she selected from nation wide which were only 20,30 and 50 thousand jobs nationwide. She went on to add more limitations in the decision. The jobs all but one existed mostly in reality as a duty within other duties for a office job title like document scanner almost everywhere no matter your job one of your additional duties is to scan your own documents. Almost no one hires a "document scanner" circuit boards mostly are made in China, packers mostly ups or fed ex or a company like amazone where he can't have the limitations imposed. She claimed no foot peddles no in an out of hot or cold no bending stopping crouching crawling lifting no real thought or decision making. Little interaction with co workers or supervisors. There's not a job in the world that allows those limitations. She didn't tell the whole truth as reflected by the record about explained actions that when in school He was a slow learner and needed help and graduated a year later yet she said he graduated so it was a sign of lack of disability. She claimed because he attempted to cut our 15X15 ft yard with a self propelled mower he wasn't disabled yet it was explained in hearing and in my letter he had to take many breaks and I had to help finish she could ask the neighbors for Christ sake. She claimed I the wife was not credible when she never met me and had no information on me other than what I Privately wrote to her about his symptoms conditions and limitations which were 100% true.
I am writing this for my husband who is completely distraught after we read his decision and I am beside myself. I should be clear since she assumed he authored certain well written cogent letters to doctors when in fact I had to and he signed I've been his POA for two years. I've been to all his therapy and Dr appointments he has in the last several years had 6-7 Dr's cardiologist neurologist neorosurgeons primary dr phsycogist psychiatrist ambulatory, therapists and I've lived with him for years. He's had so much testing and blood drawing every 3 months and MRI's X-rays psych evaluations. Btw I should note I am also an HR expert with over 16 years real world experience and degrees and certifications so I know a thing or two about disabilities job hiring types of jobs policy relating to breaks and limitations and all that governs it. They should live with him before they decide to make uneducated and incredibly dubious comments, assumptions, and claims. He Never met a more two face dishonest person and I agree after what I read and know to be true. She has her own agenda clearly either that or I'd have to question her competence on disabilities and disability law. She threw out Social Securities own Dr's evaluation and said he wasn't credible. She claimed his Reg dr wasn't credible because he didn't list all his conditions even though the records reflected them and details which her personal dr said should be in his records based on testing and because he didn't have him on a higher dose of Oxycodone consistent with his physical conditions and medical records. She then said his psychiatrists wasn't credible because her diagnosis and limitations were only her medical opinion, even though they were supported with extensive testing and records. The judge added more conditions and limitations beyond what My husband had initially and the vocational expert said some weren't even in the manual so she wasn't even sure He could do the non skilled 3 jobs she selected from nation wide which were only 20,30 and 50 thousand jobs nationwide. She went on to add more limitations in the decision. The jobs all but one existed mostly in reality as a duty within other duties for a office job title like document scanner almost everywhere no matter your job one of your additional duties is to scan your own documents. Almost no one hires a "document scanner" circuit boards mostly are made in China, packers mostly ups or fed ex or a company like amazone where he can't have the limitations imposed. She claimed no foot peddles no in an out of hot or cold no bending stopping crouching crawling lifting no real thought or decision making. Little interaction with co workers or supervisors. There's not a job in the world that allows those limitations. She didn't tell the whole truth as reflected by the record about explained actions that when in school He was a slow learner and needed help and graduated a year later yet she said he graduated so it was a sign of lack of disability. She claimed because he attempted to cut our 15X15 ft yard with a self propelled mower he wasn't disabled yet it was explained in hearing and in my letter he had to take many breaks and I had to help finish she could ask the neighbors for Christ sake. She claimed I the wife was not credible when she never met me and had no information on me other than what I Privately wrote to her about his symptoms conditions and limitations which were 100% true.
Christina mein is a wonderful judge. She was very understanding and professional during my hearing. After two months of waiting I learned today that I was granted a fully favorable decision.
Christina mein is a wonderful judge. She was very understanding and professional during my hearing. After two months of waiting I learned today that I was granted a fully favorable decision.
Christina mein is a wonderful judge. She was very understanding and professional during my hearing. After two months of waiting I learned today that I was granted a fully favorable decision.
She does not have backbone to change a previous judges ruling, who lied to me and then used the lie to threaten me into not going through with the hearing. My attourney "joke" Brent Powers, his social security knowledge is alittle less than the slowest homeless person on earth, advised me, you on your own pal,I don't know what to do. Christina I don't know how people like you are allowed to ruin regular peoples lives. But I really hope there is such a thing as karma,because you and your predecessor deserve some of your own treatment
She does not have backbone to change a previous judges ruling, who lied to me and then used the lie to threaten me into not going through with the hearing. My attourney "joke" Brent Powers, his social security knowledge is alittle less than the slowest homeless person on earth, advised me, you on your own pal,I don't know what to do. Christina I don't know how people like you are allowed to ruin regular peoples lives. But I really hope there is such a thing as karma,because you and your predecessor deserve some of your own treatment
She does not have backbone to change a previous judges ruling, who lied to me and then used the lie to threaten me into not going through with the hearing. My attourney "joke" Brent Powers, his social security knowledge is alittle less than the slowest homeless person on earth, advised me, you on your own pal,I don't know what to do. Christina I don't know how people like you are allowed to ruin regular peoples lives. But I really hope there is such a thing as karma,because you and your predecessor deserve some of your own treatment
I suffer from PTSD anxiety panic disorder I have back problems cognitive problems nuerlogoical. Problems and many other health problems now I'm suffering from leg numbness I'm waiting on a decision I visited this site and now I'm scared for my decision I can't sleep or do anything I feel bad for myself depression is the worst feeling anyone can suffer from and I've dealt with this for many years now not gotten any better the judge seemed understanding and I'm praying for the decision she sees suitable
I suffer from PTSD anxiety panic disorder I have back problems cognitive problems nuerlogoical. Problems and many other health problems now I'm suffering from leg numbness I'm waiting on a decision I visited this site and now I'm scared for my decision I can't sleep or do anything I feel bad for myself depression is the worst feeling anyone can suffer from and I've dealt with this for many years now not gotten any better the judge seemed understanding and I'm praying for the decision she sees suitable
I suffer from PTSD anxiety panic disorder I have back problems cognitive problems nuerlogoical. Problems and many other health problems now I'm suffering from leg numbness I'm waiting on a decision I visited this site and now I'm scared for my decision I can't sleep or do anything I feel bad for myself depression is the worst feeling anyone can suffer from and I've dealt with this for many years now not gotten any better the judge seemed understanding and I'm praying for the decision she sees suitable
Judge who makes decision based on her biased perception. Even if you have medical records with doctors’ statements and vocational expert testifying there is NO jobs with your type of disabilities get ready for a disappointment: no medical records, testimonies can change her mind. I wish someone would look at her cases and determine if she is cable of not biased decision.
Judge who makes decision based on her biased perception. Even if you have medical records with doctors’ statements and vocational expert testifying there is NO jobs with your type of disabilities get ready for a disappointment: no medical records, testimonies can change her mind. I wish someone would look at her cases and determine if she is cable of not biased decision.
Judge who makes decision based on her biased perception. Even if you have medical records with doctors’ statements and vocational expert testifying there is NO jobs with your type of disabilities get ready for a disappointment: no medical records, testimonies can change her mind. I wish someone would look at her cases and determine if she is cable of not biased decision.
Worse judge you can ever get. Unreliable and untrustworthy. I would NEVER EVER recommend her to my worst enemy.
Worse judge you can ever get. Unreliable and untrustworthy. I would NEVER EVER recommend her to my worst enemy.
Worse judge you can ever get. Unreliable and untrustworthy. I would NEVER EVER recommend her to my worst enemy.
Judge Meyr was professional and ran his courtroom with integrity. He never talk over anyone and was patient during our testimony. He even explained that he would not be making eye contact because he was reading the notes and listening to us at the same time. I feel confident this judge has no agenda other than to make a fair determination.
Judge Meyr was professional and ran his courtroom with integrity. He never talk over anyone and was patient during our testimony. He even explained that he would not be making eye contact because he was reading the notes and listening to us at the same time. I feel confident this judge has no agenda other than to make a fair determination.
Judge Meyr was professional and ran his courtroom with integrity. He never talk over anyone and was patient during our testimony. He even explained that he would not be making eye contact because he was reading the notes and listening to us at the same time. I feel confident this judge has no agenda other than to make a fair determination.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
I Pray the judge (Myer), his peers and superiors, all review boards and authorities, and concerned taxpayers see these comments.... Meyr is incapable of doing his job according to The Laws governing SSDI, Period. He is either Lazy, or, he is merely pushing paper to "keep the flow going" so he gets his paycheck,... without regard to people, fact, or law. He just wants a paycheck, and suffering people Be Damned! Myer has no integrity, Period ! Per my learned and experienced attorney, VERBATIM, no less,... "Myer has committed Significant Mistakes"...!!! ... mistakes based in Law AND Fact. Personally, I would immediately request any other warm, living, breathing, different judge, if assigned this inept phony who should never again be allowed to make any decision regarding the life or welfare of any other person on the planet, henceforth, let alone wear The Robe and sit on The Bench. (yes,... I was raised around attorneys and in law offices). Meyr cannot even identify ONE condition, of several, which Automatically Qualify a person for SSDI, even when in written form, on paper, in his own hands, and verbatim to the Blue Book. This is a Fact; I witnessed it myself. Additionally, the "expert" lady in his own ALJ hearing room in Columbia, MO, clearly and without question stated under oath "this man can do none of the jobs aforementioned, due to that ONE health issue, alone"... Moreover, Myer completely fails to identify when someone has MULTIPLE of said conditions, conditions which interact between and among themselves, conditions which increase the severity of each other, and are Factually Listed in the Blue Book... I should have been in the OR, having multiple postponed surgeries, instead of wasting time and life sitting in excruciating pain in front of Myer, thus postponing my own health care needs to accommodate his tight judicial schedule. Myer even noted my physical distress and pain during said hearing, on the record. Sitting before this demonstrated, incapable idiot is a waste of time, money, resources, and taxpayer dollars. Ask ALL Economists and Political Scientists! NONE will ever disagree... His clearly demonstrated inability to perform his assigned judicial functions needs immediate review by his peers, superiors, a Judicial Review Board, and The Public at large who pays his inflated and undeserved salary. He CLEARLY has his OWN agenda, which serves ONLY his interest, whatever that may be... ALL of his past cases need reviewed, each on a case-by-case basis, to which all who look will plainly see his ongoing pattern of Judicial Malfeasance. - If a Man off the Streets can see this pattern with one quick glance, then his peers should have no problem seeing same, and recommending his immediate removal from any and all judicial duties affecting taxpayer dollars and other people's lives. -- This is a fact, based in pure logic and good-old-fashioned Common Sense, AND according to The Reasonable Person Standard. **** If even ONE aspect of his ability to perform his job of function is this so-very-much in question and under such demonstrated suspicion and scrutiny by lay persons AND disability attorneys,... then EVERYTHING he touches or has ever touched now becomes suspect. This is undeniable. I cannot rate this ALJ any lower than Zero Stars, since there is no Negative scale. I only pray that eyes in positions of authority and review, and with the power to correct such egregious mistakes and malfeasance, then reverse damages caused by this judge AND remove him from service,... see these comments.
He was a great considerate kind judge when asking me questions and I felt he was through and understanding my case, I would recommend him to any one filing for disability for physical or mental conditions. He also waited on my attorney closing statement with consideration for my case.
He was a great considerate kind judge when asking me questions and I felt he was through and understanding my case, I would recommend him to any one filing for disability for physical or mental conditions. He also waited on my attorney closing statement with consideration for my case.
He was a great considerate kind judge when asking me questions and I felt he was through and understanding my case, I would recommend him to any one filing for disability for physical or mental conditions. He also waited on my attorney closing statement with consideration for my case.
Thank You! for the favorable decision. Very kind judge. was very kind and the hearing was professional. I was scared going in but He made it pleasant. I'm glad I went in and was honest it paid off.!! don't remember his clerks name...she was pleasent with my many calls. and floyd was extremely nice with all my calls over the months with me bugging him. he made it pleasant also!!!!!
Thank You! for the favorable decision. Very kind judge. was very kind and the hearing was professional. I was scared going in but He made it pleasant. I'm glad I went in and was honest it paid off.!! don't remember his clerks name...she was pleasent with my many calls. and floyd was extremely nice with all my calls over the months with me bugging him. he made it pleasant also!!!!!
Thank You! for the favorable decision. Very kind judge. was very kind and the hearing was professional. I was scared going in but He made it pleasant. I'm glad I went in and was honest it paid off.!! don't remember his clerks name...she was pleasent with my many calls. and floyd was extremely nice with all my calls over the months with me bugging him. he made it pleasant also!!!!!
At my hearing Judge Naggi did not seem to have any agenda other than determining a fair ruling. He displayed great patience in trying to sort through some issues with my confusing medical records, was considerate, and while I don't know yet the final outcome, I am confident by his professionalism and demeanor that he will make his ruling based on what he believes is fair and just.
At my hearing Judge Naggi did not seem to have any agenda other than determining a fair ruling. He displayed great patience in trying to sort through some issues with my confusing medical records, was considerate, and while I don't know yet the final outcome, I am confident by his professionalism and demeanor that he will make his ruling based on what he believes is fair and just.
At my hearing Judge Naggi did not seem to have any agenda other than determining a fair ruling. He displayed great patience in trying to sort through some issues with my confusing medical records, was considerate, and while I don't know yet the final outcome, I am confident by his professionalism and demeanor that he will make his ruling based on what he believes is fair and just.
I don't know how Judge Naggi can possibly have a 58% approved rate. He went out of his way to deny my disability claim. He tried to play doctor by claiming that since I haven't tried cortisone shots in 15 years then I haven't tried enough. Well Judge you are no doctor and my doctors laughed at the idea. They understand that cortisone only works in the joint it is injected into. Not an option when you have 30 joints that are affected. Furthermore, he threw out an affidavit from a doctor for no better reason than it was a clear indication of the validity of my claim. He did the same with my testimony. Since my hearing the stress from the continued uncertainty of my future has cost me my family, my home and my truck. I have to rely on others just to have a roof over my head. Judge Naggi and all the others in disability determination are ruining lives by constantly denying legitimate claims. And it is my opinion and only an opinion that they are doing so not out of ineptitude but purposefully and maliciously.
I don't know how Judge Naggi can possibly have a 58% approved rate. He went out of his way to deny my disability claim. He tried to play doctor by claiming that since I haven't tried cortisone shots in 15 years then I haven't tried enough. Well Judge you are no doctor and my doctors laughed at the idea. They understand that cortisone only works in the joint it is injected into. Not an option when you have 30 joints that are affected. Furthermore, he threw out an affidavit from a doctor for no better reason than it was a clear indication of the validity of my claim. He did the same with my testimony. Since my hearing the stress from the continued uncertainty of my future has cost me my family, my home and my truck. I have to rely on others just to have a roof over my head. Judge Naggi and all the others in disability determination are ruining lives by constantly denying legitimate claims. And it is my opinion and only an opinion that they are doing so not out of ineptitude but purposefully and maliciously.
I don't know how Judge Naggi can possibly have a 58% approved rate. He went out of his way to deny my disability claim. He tried to play doctor by claiming that since I haven't tried cortisone shots in 15 years then I haven't tried enough. Well Judge you are no doctor and my doctors laughed at the idea. They understand that cortisone only works in the joint it is injected into. Not an option when you have 30 joints that are affected. Furthermore, he threw out an affidavit from a doctor for no better reason than it was a clear indication of the validity of my claim. He did the same with my testimony. Since my hearing the stress from the continued uncertainty of my future has cost me my family, my home and my truck. I have to rely on others just to have a roof over my head. Judge Naggi and all the others in disability determination are ruining lives by constantly denying legitimate claims. And it is my opinion and only an opinion that they are doing so not out of ineptitude but purposefully and maliciously.
Judge Naggi was very thorough. Concise and one that actually read and understood my case of which i had been trying to obtain favor in. 2017 was the year my case came before Judge Naggi. I will FOREVER be grateful for the favorable decision via Judge Naggi. Bless him.
Judge Naggi was very thorough. Concise and one that actually read and understood my case of which i had been trying to obtain favor in. 2017 was the year my case came before Judge Naggi. I will FOREVER be grateful for the favorable decision via Judge Naggi. Bless him.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
******** judge not fair at all
******** judge not fair at all
******** judge not fair at all
Richard Staples is very fair.
Richard Staples is very fair.
Richard Staples is very fair.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
canada viagra viagra for sale no prescription viagra
canada viagra viagra for sale no prescription viagra
This judge kept a smile on his face the whole time I was giving testimony and 39 days later(total wait time two years) denied my claim. Multiple disc herniations with stenosis,multiple discs already fused and cauda equina. How many more spinal surgeries do I need and how much more nerve damage do I have to endure before I'm finally approved for disabilty. This is one piece of crap.
This judge kept a smile on his face the whole time I was giving testimony and 39 days later(total wait time two years) denied my claim. Multiple disc herniations with stenosis,multiple discs already fused and cauda equina. How many more spinal surgeries do I need and how much more nerve damage do I have to endure before I'm finally approved for disabilty. This is one piece of crap.
This judge kept a smile on his face the whole time I was giving testimony and 39 days later(total wait time two years) denied my claim. Multiple disc herniations with stenosis,multiple discs already fused and cauda equina. How many more spinal surgeries do I need and how much more nerve damage do I have to endure before I'm finally approved for disabilty. This is one piece of crap.
When I was sworn in to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, they should of did the same thing with this judge. No wonder the social security system is total failure. It's based on one big scam and that's truly shameful. So many people have worked hard all their lives literally breaking their bodies and paying into a system that promises at your time of need the assistance will be there. But, when the time comes, they make you wait so long that you lose your home, your car,etc..... You have a nervous break down from the anxiety of waiting and mounting medical bills. These government monkey judges don't care. They all have at least a six figure income and probably the best health insurance money can buy. And bonuses from the government for every claim they deny. So why should they have compassion for their fellow man when their living so well. People wonder why it takes at least two years for the social security disability claim process. It's not because of the case load, there are hundreds, if not thousands of judges out there. The delay comes from the fact that judge will look at a case and study it ever so slowly to come up with as many illegal loop holes and lies as he or she possibly can just to stall the case. It's these lies and deceit that have caused the social security system to crash and burn.
When I was sworn in to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, they should of did the same thing with this judge. No wonder the social security system is total failure. It's based on one big scam and that's truly shameful. So many people have worked hard all their lives literally breaking their bodies and paying into a system that promises at your time of need the assistance will be there. But, when the time comes, they make you wait so long that you lose your home, your car,etc..... You have a nervous break down from the anxiety of waiting and mounting medical bills. These government monkey judges don't care. They all have at least a six figure income and probably the best health insurance money can buy. And bonuses from the government for every claim they deny. So why should they have compassion for their fellow man when their living so well. People wonder why it takes at least two years for the social security disability claim process. It's not because of the case load, there are hundreds, if not thousands of judges out there. The delay comes from the fact that judge will look at a case and study it ever so slowly to come up with as many illegal loop holes and lies as he or she possibly can just to stall the case. It's these lies and deceit that have caused the social security system to crash and burn.
When I was sworn in to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, they should of did the same thing with this judge. No wonder the social security system is total failure. It's based on one big scam and that's truly shameful. So many people have worked hard all their lives literally breaking their bodies and paying into a system that promises at your time of need the assistance will be there. But, when the time comes, they make you wait so long that you lose your home, your car,etc..... You have a nervous break down from the anxiety of waiting and mounting medical bills. These government monkey judges don't care. They all have at least a six figure income and probably the best health insurance money can buy. And bonuses from the government for every claim they deny. So why should they have compassion for their fellow man when their living so well. People wonder why it takes at least two years for the social security disability claim process. It's not because of the case load, there are hundreds, if not thousands of judges out there. The delay comes from the fact that judge will look at a case and study it ever so slowly to come up with as many illegal loop holes and lies as he or she possibly can just to stall the case. It's these lies and deceit that have caused the social security system to crash and burn.
He will smile in your face while stabbing you in your back. I told the truth and he still denied my claim, uncredible witness he said. 10 herniated discs, with terrible pain. Worked hard all of my life only to have this person call me a liar.
He will smile in your face while stabbing you in your back. I told the truth and he still denied my claim, uncredible witness he said. 10 herniated discs, with terrible pain. Worked hard all of my life only to have this person call me a liar.
He will smile in your face while stabbing you in your back. I told the truth and he still denied my claim, uncredible witness he said. 10 herniated discs, with terrible pain. Worked hard all of my life only to have this person call me a liar.
You made me think you were a great person but you said on the letter tha t i lied after telling you all the truth hopefully they never get you as a judge !!!!!
You made me think you were a great person but you said on the letter tha t i lied after telling you all the truth hopefully they never get you as a judge !!!!!
You made me think you were a great person but you said on the letter tha t i lied after telling you all the truth hopefully they never get you as a judge !!!!!
This Judge dismissed my medical evidence by ASSUMING my medical physicians did not have all the facts. The specified "assumptions" are all things that my doctors is completely aware of. Due to his assumption that my doctors must not know these facts, he dismissed their reports and he defaulted to evidence from the social security physicians who examined me for less than 30 minutes and made over 2 years ago. This judge is in my opinion, incompetent.
This Judge dismissed my medical evidence by ASSUMING my medical physicians did not have all the facts. The specified "assumptions" are all things that my doctors is completely aware of. Due to his assumption that my doctors must not know these facts, he dismissed their reports and he defaulted to evidence from the social security physicians who examined me for less than 30 minutes and made over 2 years ago. This judge is in my opinion, incompetent.
This Judge dismissed my medical evidence by ASSUMING my medical physicians did not have all the facts. The specified "assumptions" are all things that my doctors is completely aware of. Due to his assumption that my doctors must not know these facts, he dismissed their reports and he defaulted to evidence from the social security physicians who examined me for less than 30 minutes and made over 2 years ago. This judge is in my opinion, incompetent.
I myself have faith in judge Stubblefield he's a really good administrative law judge and he's doing a fine job if you ask me plus he's one of the best administrative law judge's if not the top of all administrative law judge's to me and this is my up right opinion on judge Stubblefield..
I myself have faith in judge Stubblefield he's a really good administrative law judge and he's doing a fine job if you ask me plus he's one of the best administrative law judge's if not the top of all administrative law judge's to me and this is my up right opinion on judge Stubblefield..
I myself have faith in judge Stubblefield he's a really good administrative law judge and he's doing a fine job if you ask me plus he's one of the best administrative law judge's if not the top of all administrative law judge's to me and this is my up right opinion on judge Stubblefield..
This judge need to be fired, they paying him all that money because he and his team specialize in finding the least lil thing to deny you your benefits. He is overriding your medical conditions, by using medical-vocational rule 202.13,. That's sad, this man ruled unskilled light work exertional.😂.
This judge need to be fired, they paying him all that money because he and his team specialize in finding the least lil thing to deny you your benefits. He is overriding your medical conditions, by using medical-vocational rule 202.13,. That's sad, this man ruled unskilled light work exertional.😂.
This judge made me feel like i was in criminal trial. She also made me come for three hearings. On appeal they found she made many many "errors". aFter one hearing I actually had a breakdown and ended up attempting suicide, ending up in the hospital. I have no problem with the facts or judge being serious. But to be so mean and rude and demeaning, to have such a contempt, it seems she has her mind made up before you come in and she hates her job, or people wiht disabilities. If I knew what I knew now I would have just called it quits for good instead of being put through this. It was / is such a horrible experience that it "feels" personal. This is only my experience, so if you are going throught the process realize you may have a different experience, so dont NOT do it because of my post.
This judge made me feel like i was in criminal trial. She also made me come for three hearings. On appeal they found she made many many "errors". aFter one hearing I actually had a breakdown and ended up attempting suicide, ending up in the hospital. I have no problem with the facts or judge being serious. But to be so mean and rude and demeaning, to have such a contempt, it seems she has her mind made up before you come in and she hates her job, or people wiht disabilities. If I knew what I knew now I would have just called it quits for good instead of being put through this. It was / is such a horrible experience that it "feels" personal. This is only my experience, so if you are going throught the process realize you may have a different experience, so dont NOT do it because of my post.
This judge made me feel like i was in criminal trial. She also made me come for three hearings. On appeal they found she made many many "errors". aFter one hearing I actually had a breakdown and ended up attempting suicide, ending up in the hospital. I have no problem with the facts or judge being serious. But to be so mean and rude and demeaning, to have such a contempt, it seems she has her mind made up before you come in and she hates her job, or people wiht disabilities. If I knew what I knew now I would have just called it quits for good instead of being put through this. It was / is such a horrible experience that it "feels" personal. This is only my experience, so if you are going throught the process realize you may have a different experience, so dont NOT do it because of my post.
She was the Judge who presided over my spouse's disability hearing. Not only would she not look at him or me, she was demeaning and mishandled the whole process. It took a Federal Court to say his disability was legitimate and even then she didn't want to grant his claim. She finally said she would grant him disability but only if he would accept payment back to the second filing. This deprived him of over two years of payment for his disability, but after almost 5 years of fighting it, he was tired and accepted. She is simply a petty, small-minded, power hungry thief who is hiding behind her authority.
She was the Judge who presided over my spouse's disability hearing. Not only would she not look at him or me, she was demeaning and mishandled the whole process. It took a Federal Court to say his disability was legitimate and even then she didn't want to grant his claim. She finally said she would grant him disability but only if he would accept payment back to the second filing. This deprived him of over two years of payment for his disability, but after almost 5 years of fighting it, he was tired and accepted. She is simply a petty, small-minded, power hungry thief who is hiding behind her authority.
She was the Judge who presided over my spouse's disability hearing. Not only would she not look at him or me, she was demeaning and mishandled the whole process. It took a Federal Court to say his disability was legitimate and even then she didn't want to grant his claim. She finally said she would grant him disability but only if he would accept payment back to the second filing. This deprived him of over two years of payment for his disability, but after almost 5 years of fighting it, he was tired and accepted. She is simply a petty, small-minded, power hungry thief who is hiding behind her authority.
Linda Sybrant should be removed as an ALJ due to the horrible way she treats people who appear before her. In our case it not only appeared she had already made up her mind that disability was not an option (even though the person in her court said there were no jobs that my spouse could do). We had to go to Federal Court and when they ruled that disability should be granted, Sybrant (no I won't call her a judge) said she would only grant back pay for the 2nd filing and denied 3 additional years we should have been paid for the time it took to approve the disability. I have heard others say this is the way she will try to screw you out of what is due.
Linda Sybrant should be removed as an ALJ due to the horrible way she treats people who appear before her. In our case it not only appeared she had already made up her mind that disability was not an option (even though the person in her court said there were no jobs that my spouse could do). We had to go to Federal Court and when they ruled that disability should be granted, Sybrant (no I won't call her a judge) said she would only grant back pay for the 2nd filing and denied 3 additional years we should have been paid for the time it took to approve the disability. I have heard others say this is the way she will try to screw you out of what is due.
Linda Sybrant should be removed as an ALJ due to the horrible way she treats people who appear before her. In our case it not only appeared she had already made up her mind that disability was not an option (even though the person in her court said there were no jobs that my spouse could do). We had to go to Federal Court and when they ruled that disability should be granted, Sybrant (no I won't call her a judge) said she would only grant back pay for the 2nd filing and denied 3 additional years we should have been paid for the time it took to approve the disability. I have heard others say this is the way she will try to screw you out of what is due.
Horrible mean and rude. Didn't want me to speak at all during hearing (as rep); said I was only allowed 2 more questions to ask, censored the content of my questions and no happy when objected to VE, interrupted my cross of VE. Overall, clt did NOT receive a fair and impartial hearing.
Horrible mean and rude. Didn't want me to speak at all during hearing (as rep); said I was only allowed 2 more questions to ask, censored the content of my questions and no happy when objected to VE, interrupted my cross of VE. Overall, clt did NOT receive a fair and impartial hearing.
Horrible mean and rude. Didn't want me to speak at all during hearing (as rep); said I was only allowed 2 more questions to ask, censored the content of my questions and no happy when objected to VE, interrupted my cross of VE. Overall, clt did NOT receive a fair and impartial hearing.
Not horrible, mean or rude. Very kind & patient with my MR client. Not my first hearing with him and I've never had a problem with him. I disagree with his decisions frequently because they're frequently unfavorable, but as far as his hearing demeanor, never a problem. I can't imagine what the 05/09/12 poster must have done to bring out that kind of behavior.
Not horrible, mean or rude. Very kind & patient with my MR client. Not my first hearing with him and I've never had a problem with him. I disagree with his decisions frequently because they're frequently unfavorable, but as far as his hearing demeanor, never a problem. I can't imagine what the 05/09/12 poster must have done to bring out that kind of behavior.
Not horrible, mean or rude. Very kind & patient with my MR client. Not my first hearing with him and I've never had a problem with him. I disagree with his decisions frequently because they're frequently unfavorable, but as far as his hearing demeanor, never a problem. I can't imagine what the 05/09/12 poster must have done to bring out that kind of behavior.