LAS-VEGAS, Nevada Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Las-vegas, NEVADA, 8 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Las-vegas, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 17 months. The average case processing time in Las-vegas is 557 days. The Las-vegas average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 46%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Las-vegas ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAS VEGAS | 8 | 17.0 months | 557 days | 2.0 | 16% | 46% | 38% |
| NEVADA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.00 months | 1.95 | 557 days | 4153 | 1867 | 828 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 12
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gary L Vanderhoof | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Lesley Troope | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| Daniel F Loughry | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael B Kennett | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Barry H Jenkins | 39% | 15% | 45% |
| Cynthia R Hoover | 35% | 15% | 50% |
| David K Gatto | 42% | 16% | 43% |
| Craig Ellis | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Christopher R Daniels | 51% | 16% | 33% |
| John Cusker | 43% | 18% | 39% |
| Donald R Colpitts | 73% | 15% | 12% |
| Norman L Bennett | 46% | 12% | 43% |
313 Comments
This Judge is so rude one of the worst ever he is a racist, you can tell and I have proof of it, he didnt give me time to explain my case he had his mind made was denied 6 days later with a letter in the mail............I pray to God i dont get him again
This Judge is so rude one of the worst ever he is a racist, you can tell and I have proof of it, he didnt give me time to explain my case he had his mind made was denied 6 days later with a letter in the mail............I pray to God i dont get him again
This Judge is so rude one of the worst ever he is a racist, you can tell and I have proof of it, he didnt give me time to explain my case he had his mind made was denied 6 days later with a letter in the mail............I pray to God i dont get him again
Judge Bennett , his clerk and the officer in the front office ,were all extremely competent , friendly and ready to listen to me and to my evidence that I presented. He ruled within several days and his total efficency , was above reproach. Even being saddled with no lawyer to represent me , all it took was being honest and showing good evidence.
Judge Bennett , his clerk and the officer in the front office ,were all extremely competent , friendly and ready to listen to me and to my evidence that I presented. He ruled within several days and his total efficency , was above reproach. Even being saddled with no lawyer to represent me , all it took was being honest and showing good evidence.
Judge Bennett , his clerk and the officer in the front office ,were all extremely competent , friendly and ready to listen to me and to my evidence that I presented. He ruled within several days and his total efficency , was above reproach. Even being saddled with no lawyer to represent me , all it took was being honest and showing good evidence.
He is the absolute worst!!! If you get assigned to him, try your hardest to get another judge to rule on your case. He make me think I was approved & then a few days later, I received the denial in the mail. It was all a big joke to him. Apparently once you get a judge, you will get him again on any appeals. Even with all the medical proof I have of my injuries, as well as doctors notes, it won't matter. I feel doomed all because of this man. It is so unfair. For this reason, I'm leaving this state. I'm sure any other state will approve me immediately. Vegas is one of the worst for any kind of help!!
He is the absolute worst!!! If you get assigned to him, try your hardest to get another judge to rule on your case. He make me think I was approved & then a few days later, I received the denial in the mail. It was all a big joke to him. Apparently once you get a judge, you will get him again on any appeals. Even with all the medical proof I have of my injuries, as well as doctors notes, it won't matter. I feel doomed all because of this man. It is so unfair. For this reason, I'm leaving this state. I'm sure any other state will approve me immediately. Vegas is one of the worst for any kind of help!!
He is the absolute worst!!! If you get assigned to him, try your hardest to get another judge to rule on your case. He make me think I was approved & then a few days later, I received the denial in the mail. It was all a big joke to him. Apparently once you get a judge, you will get him again on any appeals. Even with all the medical proof I have of my injuries, as well as doctors notes, it won't matter. I feel doomed all because of this man. It is so unfair. For this reason, I'm leaving this state. I'm sure any other state will approve me immediately. Vegas is one of the worst for any kind of help!!
Rude, does not care, thinks its a game, no respect, doesn't listen Terrible Judge. In this day and age a Judge should consider all the information. This judge uses personal information he encounters such as an affair that happened years ago, and entered it into the denial and called it "adultry". What kind of person does this to someone who has mental and physical ailments? It wasn't even relevent
Rude, does not care, thinks its a game, no respect, doesn't listen Terrible Judge. In this day and age a Judge should consider all the information. This judge uses personal information he encounters such as an affair that happened years ago, and entered it into the denial and called it "adultry". What kind of person does this to someone who has mental and physical ailments? It wasn't even relevent
Rude, does not care, thinks its a game, no respect, doesn't listen Terrible Judge. In this day and age a Judge should consider all the information. This judge uses personal information he encounters such as an affair that happened years ago, and entered it into the denial and called it "adultry". What kind of person does this to someone who has mental and physical ailments? It wasn't even relevent
Judge bennett was fair ,and straight forward when making his decsion in regards to my case. He ask questions that made sense and inevitably help him with his decsion.honesty and doctors visits a must.i am elated and hoping to be able to better the quality of my life in the future. Judge bennett u r the best. THANK YOU
Judge bennett was fair ,and straight forward when making his decsion in regards to my case. He ask questions that made sense and inevitably help him with his decsion.honesty and doctors visits a must.i am elated and hoping to be able to better the quality of my life in the future. Judge bennett u r the best. THANK YOU
Judge bennett was fair ,and straight forward when making his decsion in regards to my case. He ask questions that made sense and inevitably help him with his decsion.honesty and doctors visits a must.i am elated and hoping to be able to better the quality of my life in the future. Judge bennett u r the best. THANK YOU
Judge was in my favor for good reason, however, all monies have not been returned to me as yet, nor addressed.
Judge was in my favor for good reason, however, all monies have not been returned to me as yet, nor addressed.
Judge was in my favor for good reason, however, all monies have not been returned to me as yet, nor addressed.
This judge is not a fair judge. He needs to step down. He has no compassion. Sits on his perch gives you the "mean eye" thats when all your positive goes out the window. I got denied and now are having to go thru an appeal and also was just diagnosed with hemiplegia and i am now in a wheelchair. Thank god for Medicaid because i would not be getting the medical help for my condition. He forced my hand to go on welfare.
This judge is not a fair judge. He needs to step down. He has no compassion. Sits on his perch gives you the "mean eye" thats when all your positive goes out the window. I got denied and now are having to go thru an appeal and also was just diagnosed with hemiplegia and i am now in a wheelchair. Thank god for Medicaid because i would not be getting the medical help for my condition. He forced my hand to go on welfare.
This judge is not a fair judge. He needs to step down. He has no compassion. Sits on his perch gives you the "mean eye" thats when all your positive goes out the window. I got denied and now are having to go thru an appeal and also was just diagnosed with hemiplegia and i am now in a wheelchair. Thank god for Medicaid because i would not be getting the medical help for my condition. He forced my hand to go on welfare.
I had my hearing with Bennett. Watch out for this judge, he picks and chooses things you say and dissects the parts that are out of context that he uses for his reasons to decline your case. He even added in his decision that I consistently smoke cigarettes and I DONT SMOKE, so he added FALSE information on my case. He took more weight on the Social Security doctor who saw me for 20 minutes, one time, 2 years ago and disregarded my doctor who I have been with for over 11 years.
I had my hearing with Bennett. Watch out for this judge, he picks and chooses things you say and dissects the parts that are out of context that he uses for his reasons to decline your case. He even added in his decision that I consistently smoke cigarettes and I DONT SMOKE, so he added FALSE information on my case. He took more weight on the Social Security doctor who saw me for 20 minutes, one time, 2 years ago and disregarded my doctor who I have been with for over 11 years.
I had my hearing with Bennett. Watch out for this judge, he picks and chooses things you say and dissects the parts that are out of context that he uses for his reasons to decline your case. He even added in his decision that I consistently smoke cigarettes and I DONT SMOKE, so he added FALSE information on my case. He took more weight on the Social Security doctor who saw me for 20 minutes, one time, 2 years ago and disregarded my doctor who I have been with for over 11 years.
JUDGE NORMAN L BENNETT was understandably inquisitive but listened and made a fair decision on the spot.
JUDGE NORMAN L BENNETT was understandably inquisitive but listened and made a fair decision on the spot.
JUDGE NORMAN L BENNETT was understandably inquisitive but listened and made a fair decision on the spot.
Talk about fraud! His "evidence" IS ******** and these types of radical ****** need to be reigned in now!
Talk about fraud! His "evidence" IS ******** and these types of radical ****** need to be reigned in now!
Talk about fraud! His "evidence" IS ******** and these types of radical ****** need to be reigned in now!
Awful judge. Unkempt and unprofessional appearance. Long story short he denied me after making me wait 9 months for a decision. If he is your judge MOVE! And get another one. He denies everyone.
Awful judge. Unkempt and unprofessional appearance. Long story short he denied me after making me wait 9 months for a decision. If he is your judge MOVE! And get another one. He denies everyone.
Awful judge. Unkempt and unprofessional appearance. Long story short he denied me after making me wait 9 months for a decision. If he is your judge MOVE! And get another one. He denies everyone.
Everyone is making positive statements about this judge because they got approved and vice versa. Well guess what ? He disapproved me and I will tell you the truth about this judge. He dissects what you say and gives no weight to medical opinions and just makes his own decision based on , well actually I don’t know how he makes his decisions on people because it’s not rational.
Everyone is making positive statements about this judge because they got approved and vice versa. Well guess what ? He disapproved me and I will tell you the truth about this judge. He dissects what you say and gives no weight to medical opinions and just makes his own decision based on , well actually I don’t know how he makes his decisions on people because it’s not rational.
Everyone is making positive statements about this judge because they got approved and vice versa. Well guess what ? He disapproved me and I will tell you the truth about this judge. He dissects what you say and gives no weight to medical opinions and just makes his own decision based on , well actually I don’t know how he makes his decisions on people because it’s not rational.
Biased judge. Obvious never read my medical records. Had his mind made up prior to the hearing. ALJ’s are supposed to be independent reviewers of fact. Not biased and lazy.
Biased judge. Obvious never read my medical records. Had his mind made up prior to the hearing. ALJ’s are supposed to be independent reviewers of fact. Not biased and lazy.
Biased judge. Obvious never read my medical records. Had his mind made up prior to the hearing. ALJ’s are supposed to be independent reviewers of fact. Not biased and lazy.
Our family is personally devastated by Judge Bennett's ruling. He ruled against our daughter's disability hearing. Our daughter is 23 years old, has schizophrenia, has an IQ of 78 and is at the developmental level of an 11-year old. She works part-time at a school cafeteria with help from kind staff. At home we help her wash her hair and with dressing appropriately.Today a dental hygienist was upset because we weren't helping her enough with her teeth cleaning and she had black substances and tartar on her teeth. We have an older child with Aspergers that we have not sought disability for as she is able to work. We also rehabilitated another child with Tourette's and our youngest with ADD. Out of our 5 children only 1 is free of neurological challenges and yet we have only sought disability benefits for our most severely affected child. I work as an RN and my husband is a PA. Every day we see people more capable than our daughter who are receiving disability benefits and it is appalling to us the irony of the whole situation. I think judge Bennett needs to spend a day at our house washing our daughters hair, brushing her teeth and driving her to and from work. 11 year olds don't drive. And if she truly is at the developmental age of 11 arent there laws against child labor? Maybe we should just have her quit her job too.
Our family is personally devastated by Judge Bennett's ruling. He ruled against our daughter's disability hearing. Our daughter is 23 years old, has schizophrenia, has an IQ of 78 and is at the developmental level of an 11-year old. She works part-time at a school cafeteria with help from kind staff. At home we help her wash her hair and with dressing appropriately.Today a dental hygienist was upset because we weren't helping her enough with her teeth cleaning and she had black substances and tartar on her teeth. We have an older child with Aspergers that we have not sought disability for as she is able to work. We also rehabilitated another child with Tourette's and our youngest with ADD. Out of our 5 children only 1 is free of neurological challenges and yet we have only sought disability benefits for our most severely affected child. I work as an RN and my husband is a PA. Every day we see people more capable than our daughter who are receiving disability benefits and it is appalling to us the irony of the whole situation. I think judge Bennett needs to spend a day at our house washing our daughters hair, brushing her teeth and driving her to and from work. 11 year olds don't drive. And if she truly is at the developmental age of 11 arent there laws against child labor? Maybe we should just have her quit her job too.
Our family is personally devastated by Judge Bennett's ruling. He ruled against our daughter's disability hearing. Our daughter is 23 years old, has schizophrenia, has an IQ of 78 and is at the developmental level of an 11-year old. She works part-time at a school cafeteria with help from kind staff. At home we help her wash her hair and with dressing appropriately.Today a dental hygienist was upset because we weren't helping her enough with her teeth cleaning and she had black substances and tartar on her teeth. We have an older child with Aspergers that we have not sought disability for as she is able to work. We also rehabilitated another child with Tourette's and our youngest with ADD. Out of our 5 children only 1 is free of neurological challenges and yet we have only sought disability benefits for our most severely affected child. I work as an RN and my husband is a PA. Every day we see people more capable than our daughter who are receiving disability benefits and it is appalling to us the irony of the whole situation. I think judge Bennett needs to spend a day at our house washing our daughters hair, brushing her teeth and driving her to and from work. 11 year olds don't drive. And if she truly is at the developmental age of 11 arent there laws against child labor? Maybe we should just have her quit her job too.
if you get this ALJ, MOVE, REAPPLY. YOU DO NOT STAY A CHANCE!!!!!!!!!!
if you get this ALJ, MOVE, REAPPLY. YOU DO NOT STAY A CHANCE!!!!!!!!!!
if you get this ALJ, MOVE, REAPPLY. YOU DO NOT STAY A CHANCE!!!!!!!!!!
One of the best judges in the nation. Very friendly, knowledgeable, and runs hearings with thoroughness, efficiency, and compassion. Jokes with attorneys off the record. Very good at putting everyone (clients and attorneys) at ease.
One of the best judges in the nation. Very friendly, knowledgeable, and runs hearings with thoroughness, efficiency, and compassion. Jokes with attorneys off the record. Very good at putting everyone (clients and attorneys) at ease.
One of the best judges in the nation. Very friendly, knowledgeable, and runs hearings with thoroughness, efficiency, and compassion. Jokes with attorneys off the record. Very good at putting everyone (clients and attorneys) at ease.
This judge made my family member at ease and even joked with them. Efficent and very friendly. That being said, doesn't mean he will approve ur case. Evidence is crucial as well as the hearing....
This judge made my family member at ease and even joked with them. Efficent and very friendly. That being said, doesn't mean he will approve ur case. Evidence is crucial as well as the hearing....
This judge made my family member at ease and even joked with them. Efficent and very friendly. That being said, doesn't mean he will approve ur case. Evidence is crucial as well as the hearing....
He is smart and competent. A friendly guy, but make no mistake he is nobody's fool. Don't think you can saunter in with no evidence and a sad story. Be prepared.
He is smart and competent. A friendly guy, but make no mistake he is nobody's fool. Don't think you can saunter in with no evidence and a sad story. Be prepared.
He is smart and competent. A friendly guy, but make no mistake he is nobody's fool. Don't think you can saunter in with no evidence and a sad story. Be prepared.
Judge Colpitts is an excellent Judge! He heard my case, read through my documentation, listened to my Advocate and came to a very sound conclusion. My Advocate and I were at ease with Judge Colpitts. He assured Us that everything would be alright. He is a great judge and compassionate.
Judge Colpitts is an excellent Judge! He heard my case, read through my documentation, listened to my Advocate and came to a very sound conclusion. My Advocate and I were at ease with Judge Colpitts. He assured Us that everything would be alright. He is a great judge and compassionate.
Judge Colpitts is an excellent Judge! He heard my case, read through my documentation, listened to my Advocate and came to a very sound conclusion. My Advocate and I were at ease with Judge Colpitts. He assured Us that everything would be alright. He is a great judge and compassionate.
He is very fair.
He is very fair.
He is very fair.
I am an attorney who regularly has hearings in 8-10 different ODARS. Over the years, I have also had hearings across the country from Key West to Anchorage; Kauai to Norfolk. I've seen a LOT of judges. Judge Colpits is one of the top 5 ALJs in the country. If you are reading this because you just received your Notice of Hearing and learned that Colpits has been assigned to your case, then you have been blessed. Not because of his approval rate, but because he actually follows the law. Instead of having his own "gut-check" definition of who is disabled, he actually applies the law and regulations in the spirit that they were written. I would not call him "pro-claimant". He is simply not anti-claimant; he does not start from a presumption of denial; and he is not typically adversarial. (I've only seen him get snarky when he knew someone was lying to him.) It's a horrible comment on the state of affairs with SSA's ALJs, but the biggest compliment I can give Judge Colpits is that he does his job the way that it is supposed to be done. The fact that he is also cordial, professional, respectful, and even compassionate at times is just a bonus. Chit-chat note: I believe he flew an F-4 in Vietnam. (USAF, I think. Could have been Navy, though.) He once surprised me in the middle of a hearing by switching to Vietnamese for a minute or two when talking to my client who immigrated when she was younger.
I am an attorney who regularly has hearings in 8-10 different ODARS. Over the years, I have also had hearings across the country from Key West to Anchorage; Kauai to Norfolk. I've seen a LOT of judges. Judge Colpits is one of the top 5 ALJs in the country. If you are reading this because you just received your Notice of Hearing and learned that Colpits has been assigned to your case, then you have been blessed. Not because of his approval rate, but because he actually follows the law. Instead of having his own "gut-check" definition of who is disabled, he actually applies the law and regulations in the spirit that they were written. I would not call him "pro-claimant". He is simply not anti-claimant; he does not start from a presumption of denial; and he is not typically adversarial. (I've only seen him get snarky when he knew someone was lying to him.) It's a horrible comment on the state of affairs with SSA's ALJs, but the biggest compliment I can give Judge Colpits is that he does his job the way that it is supposed to be done. The fact that he is also cordial, professional, respectful, and even compassionate at times is just a bonus. Chit-chat note: I believe he flew an F-4 in Vietnam. (USAF, I think. Could have been Navy, though.) He once surprised me in the middle of a hearing by switching to Vietnamese for a minute or two when talking to my client who immigrated when she was younger.
I am an attorney who regularly has hearings in 8-10 different ODARS. Over the years, I have also had hearings across the country from Key West to Anchorage; Kauai to Norfolk. I've seen a LOT of judges. Judge Colpits is one of the top 5 ALJs in the country. If you are reading this because you just received your Notice of Hearing and learned that Colpits has been assigned to your case, then you have been blessed. Not because of his approval rate, but because he actually follows the law. Instead of having his own "gut-check" definition of who is disabled, he actually applies the law and regulations in the spirit that they were written. I would not call him "pro-claimant". He is simply not anti-claimant; he does not start from a presumption of denial; and he is not typically adversarial. (I've only seen him get snarky when he knew someone was lying to him.) It's a horrible comment on the state of affairs with SSA's ALJs, but the biggest compliment I can give Judge Colpits is that he does his job the way that it is supposed to be done. The fact that he is also cordial, professional, respectful, and even compassionate at times is just a bonus. Chit-chat note: I believe he flew an F-4 in Vietnam. (USAF, I think. Could have been Navy, though.) He once surprised me in the middle of a hearing by switching to Vietnamese for a minute or two when talking to my client who immigrated when she was younger.
Just had my ALJ Hearing with him assigned to my Disability Case. Like the other people describing him as friendly, compassionate, and with a sense of humor at times! My hearing went fine and relatively short and concise. Crossing my fingers that my SSDI decision will be Favorable. God Bless!
Just had my ALJ Hearing with him assigned to my Disability Case. Like the other people describing him as friendly, compassionate, and with a sense of humor at times! My hearing went fine and relatively short and concise. Crossing my fingers that my SSDI decision will be Favorable. God Bless!
Just had my ALJ Hearing with him assigned to my Disability Case. Like the other people describing him as friendly, compassionate, and with a sense of humor at times! My hearing went fine and relatively short and concise. Crossing my fingers that my SSDI decision will be Favorable. God Bless!
Below average ALJ. Not pleasant at all to deal with and borderline rude. He will search and search for any apparent inconsistency that would not be normally material to most average ALJs but use that against a Claimant in reference to credibility. I don't believe his decisions are well written so remand is frequent.
Below average ALJ. Not pleasant at all to deal with and borderline rude. He will search and search for any apparent inconsistency that would not be normally material to most average ALJs but use that against a Claimant in reference to credibility. I don't believe his decisions are well written so remand is frequent.
Below average ALJ. Not pleasant at all to deal with and borderline rude. He will search and search for any apparent inconsistency that would not be normally material to most average ALJs but use that against a Claimant in reference to credibility. I don't believe his decisions are well written so remand is frequent.
This Judge is RUDE and inconsiderate. I wish they would allow the lawyers to choose the judge that will review your case.Everything you say he acts as if it is a lie.
This Judge is RUDE and inconsiderate. I wish they would allow the lawyers to choose the judge that will review your case.Everything you say he acts as if it is a lie.
This Judge is RUDE and inconsiderate. I wish they would allow the lawyers to choose the judge that will review your case.Everything you say he acts as if it is a lie.
VERY BIASED UNFAIR IS NOT THE WORD RACIST IS MORE LIKE IT PUTS LIES IN REPORTS TO DENY THE DISABLED PAYS ATTENTION TO DISCREDITING NON EXSISTANT DETAILS HE IS A LOW LIFE ONSIDED NAZI!!!!!
VERY BIASED UNFAIR IS NOT THE WORD RACIST IS MORE LIKE IT PUTS LIES IN REPORTS TO DENY THE DISABLED PAYS ATTENTION TO DISCREDITING NON EXSISTANT DETAILS HE IS A LOW LIFE ONSIDED NAZI!!!!!
VERY BIASED UNFAIR IS NOT THE WORD RACIST IS MORE LIKE IT PUTS LIES IN REPORTS TO DENY THE DISABLED PAYS ATTENTION TO DISCREDITING NON EXSISTANT DETAILS HE IS A LOW LIFE ONSIDED NAZI!!!!!
I went to court on 03/22/2013 This Judge comes across as being rude, However he really does listen. He asked questions about my case that were really important. By the end of the trial I wasn't sure if he was on my side or against me. With all that said, I just received a fully favorable award letter on 05/23/2013. I'm so excited!!!!
I went to court on 03/22/2013 This Judge comes across as being rude, However he really does listen. He asked questions about my case that were really important. By the end of the trial I wasn't sure if he was on my side or against me. With all that said, I just received a fully favorable award letter on 05/23/2013. I'm so excited!!!!
I went to court on 03/22/2013 This Judge comes across as being rude, However he really does listen. He asked questions about my case that were really important. By the end of the trial I wasn't sure if he was on my side or against me. With all that said, I just received a fully favorable award letter on 05/23/2013. I'm so excited!!!!
My Son was found to have a disability and it was not the first time he had Social Security Benefits ,he has it as well as my other son when they were both under age , My son was also in the military and was told to have PTSD and ADHD and border line bipolar nos , is is now 26 soon to be 27 he applied before the age of 22 , I read what ALJ John Cusker said and manipulated my words in a statement i wrote on behalf of my son , My son is struggling to provide for him self , my son has not been able to work or keep a job beyond 60 days if that , I am tired of this judging doing this to people that have a real disability , He is rude and does not consider all the evidence and his office was late in gathering the paper work and even came to say they lost some of the paper work , This judge is very rude and i see why people dislike him , he is not honest and does dirty tricks against those not doing so well &against those who have served this country what a shame on this so called Judge .
My Son was found to have a disability and it was not the first time he had Social Security Benefits ,he has it as well as my other son when they were both under age , My son was also in the military and was told to have PTSD and ADHD and border line bipolar nos , is is now 26 soon to be 27 he applied before the age of 22 , I read what ALJ John Cusker said and manipulated my words in a statement i wrote on behalf of my son , My son is struggling to provide for him self , my son has not been able to work or keep a job beyond 60 days if that , I am tired of this judging doing this to people that have a real disability , He is rude and does not consider all the evidence and his office was late in gathering the paper work and even came to say they lost some of the paper work , This judge is very rude and i see why people dislike him , he is not honest and does dirty tricks against those not doing so well &against those who have served this country what a shame on this so called Judge .
My Son was found to have a disability and it was not the first time he had Social Security Benefits ,he has it as well as my other son when they were both under age , My son was also in the military and was told to have PTSD and ADHD and border line bipolar nos , is is now 26 soon to be 27 he applied before the age of 22 , I read what ALJ John Cusker said and manipulated my words in a statement i wrote on behalf of my son , My son is struggling to provide for him self , my son has not been able to work or keep a job beyond 60 days if that , I am tired of this judging doing this to people that have a real disability , He is rude and does not consider all the evidence and his office was late in gathering the paper work and even came to say they lost some of the paper work , This judge is very rude and i see why people dislike him , he is not honest and does dirty tricks against those not doing so well &against those who have served this country what a shame on this so called Judge .
I was declared %100 disabled around 2000 by a board certified pain specialist. I have applied foe dissability 16 previous. I have been denied every time. Over these many years I have lost my home and every possesion worth anything to support my two children. I have developed savier depression i have attempted suicide 7 times before seeing this judge and once when again I recieved his denial after waiting 70 day.s for a responce.I am couch ridden and cannot walk without really bad back pain froma spinal tear. I went befor Cuscer may 29th 2013. I was bankrupt and owed friends and relatives $30,000. I am unable to sit in a chair without pillows allowing my back to be at 45' angle. Cuscer mocked me for bringing the pillows to court. Both my G.P. and psychiatrist reported limitations that resulted in no jobs available for me.He still denied me!STUNNED
I was declared %100 disabled around 2000 by a board certified pain specialist. I have applied foe dissability 16 previous. I have been denied every time. Over these many years I have lost my home and every possesion worth anything to support my two children. I have developed savier depression i have attempted suicide 7 times before seeing this judge and once when again I recieved his denial after waiting 70 day.s for a responce.I am couch ridden and cannot walk without really bad back pain froma spinal tear. I went befor Cuscer may 29th 2013. I was bankrupt and owed friends and relatives $30,000. I am unable to sit in a chair without pillows allowing my back to be at 45' angle. Cuscer mocked me for bringing the pillows to court. Both my G.P. and psychiatrist reported limitations that resulted in no jobs available for me.He still denied me!STUNNED
I was declared %100 disabled around 2000 by a board certified pain specialist. I have applied foe dissability 16 previous. I have been denied every time. Over these many years I have lost my home and every possesion worth anything to support my two children. I have developed savier depression i have attempted suicide 7 times before seeing this judge and once when again I recieved his denial after waiting 70 day.s for a responce.I am couch ridden and cannot walk without really bad back pain froma spinal tear. I went befor Cuscer may 29th 2013. I was bankrupt and owed friends and relatives $30,000. I am unable to sit in a chair without pillows allowing my back to be at 45' angle. Cuscer mocked me for bringing the pillows to court. Both my G.P. and psychiatrist reported limitations that resulted in no jobs available for me.He still denied me!STUNNED
this judge has caused my wife to go to bed for the past 6 and a half months due to the cruelty he wrote in the denial letter. I have 2 small children and due to his denial and hurtful words she has been on suicide watch 24 hours a day and cant be left alone.She has battled deep depression and stress and anxiety and social problems. He didn't care.
this judge has caused my wife to go to bed for the past 6 and a half months due to the cruelty he wrote in the denial letter. I have 2 small children and due to his denial and hurtful words she has been on suicide watch 24 hours a day and cant be left alone.She has battled deep depression and stress and anxiety and social problems. He didn't care.
this judge has caused my wife to go to bed for the past 6 and a half months due to the cruelty he wrote in the denial letter. I have 2 small children and due to his denial and hurtful words she has been on suicide watch 24 hours a day and cant be left alone.She has battled deep depression and stress and anxiety and social problems. He didn't care.
Got a partially favorable out of this pugnacious judge back in 2012. Was find with his ruling but appealed a couple of things he erred on. Appeals Council appeared to agree with me and vacated his decision on remand to fix those things. He was not happy. So he waits almost ninety days and rules on my birthday I'm now no longer disabled at all. This judge is a menace to the public and will use his office to target claimants he doesn't like. He's rude and insinuating. You get this judge? Request recusal for your own sake.
Got a partially favorable out of this pugnacious judge back in 2012. Was find with his ruling but appealed a couple of things he erred on. Appeals Council appeared to agree with me and vacated his decision on remand to fix those things. He was not happy. So he waits almost ninety days and rules on my birthday I'm now no longer disabled at all. This judge is a menace to the public and will use his office to target claimants he doesn't like. He's rude and insinuating. You get this judge? Request recusal for your own sake.
Got a partially favorable out of this pugnacious judge back in 2012. Was find with his ruling but appealed a couple of things he erred on. Appeals Council appeared to agree with me and vacated his decision on remand to fix those things. He was not happy. So he waits almost ninety days and rules on my birthday I'm now no longer disabled at all. This judge is a menace to the public and will use his office to target claimants he doesn't like. He's rude and insinuating. You get this judge? Request recusal for your own sake.
This judge saw my daughter who has been 100% disabled since three years old. She has severe panic disorder and anxiety among many other ailments. He verbally tortured her on the stand. She cried...she had a panic attack. He rolled his eyes at her and decided that since she had a child (who I have to care for) then she could work. He wouldn't allow my testimony...didn't use information from the mental treatment facility that held her impatient, and deemed her able to drive a FLAG TRUCK, case denied. To this day, 5 Years later she is still at home, a physical wreck and unable to care for herself. Having to start over...because she was so traumatized by him she refused to appeal.
This judge saw my daughter who has been 100% disabled since three years old. She has severe panic disorder and anxiety among many other ailments. He verbally tortured her on the stand. She cried...she had a panic attack. He rolled his eyes at her and decided that since she had a child (who I have to care for) then she could work. He wouldn't allow my testimony...didn't use information from the mental treatment facility that held her impatient, and deemed her able to drive a FLAG TRUCK, case denied. To this day, 5 Years later she is still at home, a physical wreck and unable to care for herself. Having to start over...because she was so traumatized by him she refused to appeal.
This judge saw my daughter who has been 100% disabled since three years old. She has severe panic disorder and anxiety among many other ailments. He verbally tortured her on the stand. She cried...she had a panic attack. He rolled his eyes at her and decided that since she had a child (who I have to care for) then she could work. He wouldn't allow my testimony...didn't use information from the mental treatment facility that held her impatient, and deemed her able to drive a FLAG TRUCK, case denied. To this day, 5 Years later she is still at home, a physical wreck and unable to care for herself. Having to start over...because she was so traumatized by him she refused to appeal.
This judge does not play around but he is also fair. If you are REALLY disable and have PROOF then you are going to be ok but if you are trying to milk the system he will smoke you.
This judge does not play around but he is also fair. If you are REALLY disable and have PROOF then you are going to be ok but if you are trying to milk the system he will smoke you.
This judge does not play around but he is also fair. If you are REALLY disable and have PROOF then you are going to be ok but if you are trying to milk the system he will smoke you.
Our ALJ hearing was in June and received fully favorable letter in December with no lawyer. We have been waiting several years but finally my husband will be receiving benefits he rightly deserves. So to others who are still waiting I pray you receive the outcome that is truly deserved.
Our ALJ hearing was in June and received fully favorable letter in December with no lawyer. We have been waiting several years but finally my husband will be receiving benefits he rightly deserves. So to others who are still waiting I pray you receive the outcome that is truly deserved.
Our ALJ hearing was in June and received fully favorable letter in December with no lawyer. We have been waiting several years but finally my husband will be receiving benefits he rightly deserves. So to others who are still waiting I pray you receive the outcome that is truly deserved.
This is a fair judge. He asked important questions and was very thorough as well as patient.. If you not are truly disabled he will know that and be denied.. He does not play games. I am grateful for the favorable decision on February 7th, 2018.. If you have to see Judge Cusker.. Come in with the truth about your condition/s and leave the games outside...
This is a fair judge. He asked important questions and was very thorough as well as patient.. If you not are truly disabled he will know that and be denied.. He does not play games. I am grateful for the favorable decision on February 7th, 2018.. If you have to see Judge Cusker.. Come in with the truth about your condition/s and leave the games outside...
This is a fair judge. He asked important questions and was very thorough as well as patient.. If you not are truly disabled he will know that and be denied.. He does not play games. I am grateful for the favorable decision on February 7th, 2018.. If you have to see Judge Cusker.. Come in with the truth about your condition/s and leave the games outside...
I would have to rate this judge a--0 from 5 stars. This is based on a true event. I had a case 9 years ago. This judge had his clerk call me & say my paper not received. Then says, oh, it is here. He suppressed evidence, lied, laughed, said I defraud irs.
I would have to rate this judge a--0 from 5 stars. This is based on a true event. I had a case 9 years ago. This judge had his clerk call me & say my paper not received. Then says, oh, it is here. He suppressed evidence, lied, laughed, said I defraud irs.
I would have to rate this judge a--0 from 5 stars. This is based on a true event. I had a case 9 years ago. This judge had his clerk call me & say my paper not received. Then says, oh, it is here. He suppressed evidence, lied, laughed, said I defraud irs.
I believe Judge Cusker is an outstanding judge. He is tough but extremely fair. He needs out the fakers from the truly disabled!
I believe Judge Cusker is an outstanding judge. He is tough but extremely fair. He needs out the fakers from the truly disabled!
I believe Judge Cusker is an outstanding judge. He is tough but extremely fair. He needs out the fakers from the truly disabled!
I had my hearing a few days ago. He is sort of rude by right to point. He asked the SSD expert about 8 questions regarding my work history and the expert said NO i can not work in this economy and NO on every other question. Does anybody know if thats good the expert is on my side?
I had my hearing a few days ago. He is sort of rude by right to point. He asked the SSD expert about 8 questions regarding my work history and the expert said NO i can not work in this economy and NO on every other question. Does anybody know if thats good the expert is on my side?
I had my hearing a few days ago. He is sort of rude by right to point. He asked the SSD expert about 8 questions regarding my work history and the expert said NO i can not work in this economy and NO on every other question. Does anybody know if thats good the expert is on my side?
Wes, If they testified on your behalf, then yes it's usually good.. You may get a favorable outcome. Unlike my judge, judge Ryan Johannes. Judge Johannes had his friend testify against me, didn't let me testify on my behalf, only allowed yes or no answers from me and ignored the facts from the state doctors. My judge made his decision out of spite and my political affiliation. I wish you luck and hope your judge sides with facts and doesn't pull what my dishonorable judge pulled. Signed, The Victim Of dishonorable Johannes
Wes, If they testified on your behalf, then yes it's usually good.. You may get a favorable outcome. Unlike my judge, judge Ryan Johannes. Judge Johannes had his friend testify against me, didn't let me testify on my behalf, only allowed yes or no answers from me and ignored the facts from the state doctors. My judge made his decision out of spite and my political affiliation. I wish you luck and hope your judge sides with facts and doesn't pull what my dishonorable judge pulled. Signed, The Victim Of dishonorable Johannes
Wes, If they testified on your behalf, then yes it's usually good.. You may get a favorable outcome. Unlike my judge, judge Ryan Johannes. Judge Johannes had his friend testify against me, didn't let me testify on my behalf, only allowed yes or no answers from me and ignored the facts from the state doctors. My judge made his decision out of spite and my political affiliation. I wish you luck and hope your judge sides with facts and doesn't pull what my dishonorable judge pulled. Signed, The Victim Of dishonorable Johannes
Slow
Slow
Slow
Thank you for going through all my sons records and being fair you are very good at your job.
Thank you for going through all my sons records and being fair you are very good at your job.
Thank you for going through all my sons records and being fair you are very good at your job.
Judge Daniels is very professional and courteous, though somewhat reserved. He is extremely knowledgeable of the Social Security rules and procedures. He is always familiar with the claimant's file prior to the hearing. He prefers to ask most of the questions at the hearing but will allow representatives the opportunity to make opening and closing remarks and question witnesses. He is always polite to both claimants and representatives. Excellent ALJ!
Judge Daniels is very professional and courteous, though somewhat reserved. He is extremely knowledgeable of the Social Security rules and procedures. He is always familiar with the claimant's file prior to the hearing. He prefers to ask most of the questions at the hearing but will allow representatives the opportunity to make opening and closing remarks and question witnesses. He is always polite to both claimants and representatives. Excellent ALJ!
Judge Daniels is very professional and courteous, though somewhat reserved. He is extremely knowledgeable of the Social Security rules and procedures. He is always familiar with the claimant's file prior to the hearing. He prefers to ask most of the questions at the hearing but will allow representatives the opportunity to make opening and closing remarks and question witnesses. He is always polite to both claimants and representatives. Excellent ALJ!
Hi: My name is Eva Jo Wilson ( Slack) . I received from the Office of hearings Operations dated April 12 2019 a Notice if Decision from Administrative law Judge Christopher Daniels. 60 days passed without me hearing from the Simmons SSA office so I called, spoke to a gentleman who promised a call back from the person responsible for my case. Received that call that same day June 13th. She made me aware of some policy facts of SSDA. She also stated that Judge Daniels had in incompetence made an error concerning my case; which I felt was very rude and character defaming. Her name was Rosie. Then she that the Decision error was return to Administrative Judge Daniels to correct his error. How disrespectful she was. A rude and shroud tone of voice. Sincerely Eva J Wilson Slack
Hi: My name is Eva Jo Wilson ( Slack) . I received from the Office of hearings Operations dated April 12 2019 a Notice if Decision from Administrative law Judge Christopher Daniels. 60 days passed without me hearing from the Simmons SSA office so I called, spoke to a gentleman who promised a call back from the person responsible for my case. Received that call that same day June 13th. She made me aware of some policy facts of SSDA. She also stated that Judge Daniels had in incompetence made an error concerning my case; which I felt was very rude and character defaming. Her name was Rosie. Then she that the Decision error was return to Administrative Judge Daniels to correct his error. How disrespectful she was. A rude and shroud tone of voice. Sincerely Eva J Wilson Slack
Hi: My name is Eva Jo Wilson ( Slack) . I received from the Office of hearings Operations dated April 12 2019 a Notice if Decision from Administrative law Judge Christopher Daniels. 60 days passed without me hearing from the Simmons SSA office so I called, spoke to a gentleman who promised a call back from the person responsible for my case. Received that call that same day June 13th. She made me aware of some policy facts of SSDA. She also stated that Judge Daniels had in incompetence made an error concerning my case; which I felt was very rude and character defaming. Her name was Rosie. Then she that the Decision error was return to Administrative Judge Daniels to correct his error. How disrespectful she was. A rude and shroud tone of voice. Sincerely Eva J Wilson Slack
Great Judge
Great Judge
Great Judge
Great Judge he really understands
Great Judge he really understands
Great Judge he really understands
He denied my friend with spinal cord damage who lives in a wheelchair, yet approved a neighbor who takes medications for depression and parties all night long. He has no idea what he is doing. How such a moron, low moron or complete idiot could be appointed to the bench truly shows that SSA is doomed.
He denied my friend with spinal cord damage who lives in a wheelchair, yet approved a neighbor who takes medications for depression and parties all night long. He has no idea what he is doing. How such a moron, low moron or complete idiot could be appointed to the bench truly shows that SSA is doomed.
He denied my friend with spinal cord damage who lives in a wheelchair, yet approved a neighbor who takes medications for depression and parties all night long. He has no idea what he is doing. How such a moron, low moron or complete idiot could be appointed to the bench truly shows that SSA is doomed.
He does not seem to know what he is doing. I have spinal nerve impingement which meets an SSA listing, yet he denied my claim. Where do they hire such people?
He does not seem to know what he is doing. I have spinal nerve impingement which meets an SSA listing, yet he denied my claim. Where do they hire such people?
He does not seem to know what he is doing. I have spinal nerve impingement which meets an SSA listing, yet he denied my claim. Where do they hire such people?
He was a horrible judge!!! He ignored my illnesses and with physical proof from doctors tests in his hands, essentially called me a liar. I was and still am so upset, I truly have not been able to work and haven't been for about 8 years now. His decision claimed, that I knew that 3-4 years after applying for SSDI, whether approved or not my life would be easier, forget that I'm in constant pain, also when I didn't work I was a stay home 24/7 Mom he didn't bother to ask. He deemed me as lazy and looking for a hand out. He did not read my med charts nor smart enough to understand them. I was just a lazy Mom of 3 young kids, and when I did work paid a hefty sum for child care to work, till my body gave out. He is the WORST Judge!!!!
He was a horrible judge!!! He ignored my illnesses and with physical proof from doctors tests in his hands, essentially called me a liar. I was and still am so upset, I truly have not been able to work and haven't been for about 8 years now. His decision claimed, that I knew that 3-4 years after applying for SSDI, whether approved or not my life would be easier, forget that I'm in constant pain, also when I didn't work I was a stay home 24/7 Mom he didn't bother to ask. He deemed me as lazy and looking for a hand out. He did not read my med charts nor smart enough to understand them. I was just a lazy Mom of 3 young kids, and when I did work paid a hefty sum for child care to work, till my body gave out. He is the WORST Judge!!!!
He was a horrible judge!!! He ignored my illnesses and with physical proof from doctors tests in his hands, essentially called me a liar. I was and still am so upset, I truly have not been able to work and haven't been for about 8 years now. His decision claimed, that I knew that 3-4 years after applying for SSDI, whether approved or not my life would be easier, forget that I'm in constant pain, also when I didn't work I was a stay home 24/7 Mom he didn't bother to ask. He deemed me as lazy and looking for a hand out. He did not read my med charts nor smart enough to understand them. I was just a lazy Mom of 3 young kids, and when I did work paid a hefty sum for child care to work, till my body gave out. He is the WORST Judge!!!!
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
He was by far the best Judge that I have ever been in front of. I was having issues with my ignorant attorney trying to botch my case but he still asked me questions and took time to see the reality of my situation...
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
Judge Hoover is very biased towards denying people the disability insurance they worked and paid for. The way she does it is by using selective facts creating falsehoods in her finding. In my case she quoted a 2nd assistant to the surgeon, a throat doctors I seen years ago, fragments in medical records before the onset date, and 2 doctors she enlisted to review facts she sent them that never examined me first hand. She did not even refer to any statements made by the surgeon that performed my 3rd and most recent spin surgery or any of the pain management doctors I have seen every month for the last 6 years. What is especially unfair is the falsehoods in her findings she never asked about when we had our live session. Most of these things can easily be disproven but the only option is to write to this place in Virginia and wait a year and half. Meanwhile I am completely unable to work now, cannot not even sit in a chair for more then an hour, can not stand very long. One of my largest disappointments in life is the social security system, I received statements for years that said if you become disabled you will receive X per month. The system is not even consistent within its self, previous to my hearing the letter said my condition was severe but might improve. It has continued to get worse. Somehow judge Hoover concluded that I can sit or stand up to 6 or 8 hours a day. I can do nothing even close to this on a consistent basis. Even if true can you really have a job, function at home (like getting dressed, eat), drive somewhere – within the 6 to 8-hour function window. The window is really closer to 2 hours per day. Feeling depressed. Its not safe for me to drive in traffic with my right leg issues. All judge Hoover would need to do to decide differently is to read the notes from current pain management that says pain not under control even with drugs, read where the surgeon post surgery talks about my limited mobility. Look at the case as a whole with 6 years of pain management, physical therapy, 3 surgeries, many injections, countless other tests and procedures I have tried. All without success. Judge Hoover just selects facts to support turning you down, does not even acknowledge or address facts that supports approval from much more creditable sources such as the neurosurgeon that last work on you, or the pain management doctors that see you monthly.
She uses her state doctors opinions and ignores all others. For example, without getting specific, she said that since the state doctors said I could do something makes it true. However doctors of mine have said different (who have nothing to gain by telling the truth). Another example is her outright lies. For example, something in my medical records as fact, was said only to be testimony. Something very important. If you have this judge make sure you have a lawyer and be prepared to be brow beaten (phrase) in court. Anything you say will be instantly challenged by her - because she instantly disbelieves anything you say. Her goal in doing this is to intimidate you so you change your testimony and sound inconsistent, when in fact, it's akin to interrogation techniques. Rather than being inquisitive, she acts as if you are in criminal court. She is not a good judge & that is why her denial rate is high.
She uses her state doctors opinions and ignores all others. For example, without getting specific, she said that since the state doctors said I could do something makes it true. However doctors of mine have said different (who have nothing to gain by telling the truth). Another example is her outright lies. For example, something in my medical records as fact, was said only to be testimony. Something very important. If you have this judge make sure you have a lawyer and be prepared to be brow beaten (phrase) in court. Anything you say will be instantly challenged by her - because she instantly disbelieves anything you say. Her goal in doing this is to intimidate you so you change your testimony and sound inconsistent, when in fact, it's akin to interrogation techniques. Rather than being inquisitive, she acts as if you are in criminal court. She is not a good judge & that is why her denial rate is high.
She uses her state doctors opinions and ignores all others. For example, without getting specific, she said that since the state doctors said I could do something makes it true. However doctors of mine have said different (who have nothing to gain by telling the truth). Another example is her outright lies. For example, something in my medical records as fact, was said only to be testimony. Something very important. If you have this judge make sure you have a lawyer and be prepared to be brow beaten (phrase) in court. Anything you say will be instantly challenged by her - because she instantly disbelieves anything you say. Her goal in doing this is to intimidate you so you change your testimony and sound inconsistent, when in fact, it's akin to interrogation techniques. Rather than being inquisitive, she acts as if you are in criminal court. She is not a good judge & that is why her denial rate is high.
I had my disability hearing earlier today, so my review on this judge is not convaluted by anger or bias due to her decision on my case. Judge Hoover was actully nothing like others say in her reviews. She was fair, repectfull, understandig and unbiased. She actully gave two hypothetical work situations that were balanced and not infavor of only the state rep, but also for me. I advise before seeing her if she is picked to review your case that you dont use her denial rate or former reviews to establish a opinon. I did and I was terrified and pleasently suprised once I met her. Even judges are human. If we are nasty to them they are going to be nasty to us.
I had my disability hearing earlier today, so my review on this judge is not convaluted by anger or bias due to her decision on my case. Judge Hoover was actully nothing like others say in her reviews. She was fair, repectfull, understandig and unbiased. She actully gave two hypothetical work situations that were balanced and not infavor of only the state rep, but also for me. I advise before seeing her if she is picked to review your case that you dont use her denial rate or former reviews to establish a opinon. I did and I was terrified and pleasently suprised once I met her. Even judges are human. If we are nasty to them they are going to be nasty to us.
I had my disability hearing earlier today, so my review on this judge is not convaluted by anger or bias due to her decision on my case. Judge Hoover was actully nothing like others say in her reviews. She was fair, repectfull, understandig and unbiased. She actully gave two hypothetical work situations that were balanced and not infavor of only the state rep, but also for me. I advise before seeing her if she is picked to review your case that you dont use her denial rate or former reviews to establish a opinon. I did and I was terrified and pleasently suprised once I met her. Even judges are human. If we are nasty to them they are going to be nasty to us.
How is she my son was diagnosed with adhd mood disorder and odd even his school said with his disability it affects his learning what do u think her discission will be and i hve an attorney
How is she my son was diagnosed with adhd mood disorder and odd even his school said with his disability it affects his learning what do u think her discission will be and i hve an attorney
How is she my son was diagnosed with adhd mood disorder and odd even his school said with his disability it affects his learning what do u think her discission will be and i hve an attorney
Any social security ALJ who has an approval rating of only 22 percent is clearly a republican POS. I can't figure out why social security allows such biased people to rule in such important matters. ALJ's like Cynthia are an abomination to the system. Eventually SSA will figure it out and get rid of her. The problem is they move very slowly in this regard.
Any social security ALJ who has an approval rating of only 22 percent is clearly a republican POS. I can't figure out why social security allows such biased people to rule in such important matters. ALJ's like Cynthia are an abomination to the system. Eventually SSA will figure it out and get rid of her. The problem is they move very slowly in this regard.
Any social security ALJ who has an approval rating of only 22 percent is clearly a republican POS. I can't figure out why social security allows such biased people to rule in such important matters. ALJ's like Cynthia are an abomination to the system. Eventually SSA will figure it out and get rid of her. The problem is they move very slowly in this regard.
Any judge with a 25 percent approval rating is a total sleezeball. I hope you never get this Jude.
Any judge with a 25 percent approval rating is a total sleezeball. I hope you never get this Jude.
Any judge with a 25 percent approval rating is a total sleezeball. I hope you never get this Jude.
I had this judge and totally agree with the people's comments. She makes her decisions off of what "her" doctors say...how can she do that when those doctors haven't examined me plus she doesn't look at all the facts and twists things around and creates lies. She said one doctor didn't say anything about my neck and back...that's because she is an ENT! She never even touched on the fact that I have fibromyalgia...it was diagnosed by 3 different rheumatologists! I had a residual functional capacity test done by a physical therapist...she deemed me less than sedentary. The judge said a physical theripist is not a credible source...SERIOUSLY...who better than a phyisical theripist to know how a body is supposed to move and function? There was also one from my rheumatologist that she ignored. I think she was looking for more evidence for my arthritis and fibromyalgia than what I had...I am sorry...I am not working and can not afford all the doctor bills to support her decisions. What makes this so sad is...IT IS MY MONEY....I worked for it. I know people that have less issues than I have and they were approved for their Social Security disability and they aren't sitting at home doing nothing! Guess I just got the short straw when it came to the judge I got. Who says the judicial system is fair!
I had this judge and totally agree with the people's comments. She makes her decisions off of what "her" doctors say...how can she do that when those doctors haven't examined me plus she doesn't look at all the facts and twists things around and creates lies. She said one doctor didn't say anything about my neck and back...that's because she is an ENT! She never even touched on the fact that I have fibromyalgia...it was diagnosed by 3 different rheumatologists! I had a residual functional capacity test done by a physical therapist...she deemed me less than sedentary. The judge said a physical theripist is not a credible source...SERIOUSLY...who better than a phyisical theripist to know how a body is supposed to move and function? There was also one from my rheumatologist that she ignored. I think she was looking for more evidence for my arthritis and fibromyalgia than what I had...I am sorry...I am not working and can not afford all the doctor bills to support her decisions. What makes this so sad is...IT IS MY MONEY....I worked for it. I know people that have less issues than I have and they were approved for their Social Security disability and they aren't sitting at home doing nothing! Guess I just got the short straw when it came to the judge I got. Who says the judicial system is fair!
I had this judge and totally agree with the people's comments. She makes her decisions off of what "her" doctors say...how can she do that when those doctors haven't examined me plus she doesn't look at all the facts and twists things around and creates lies. She said one doctor didn't say anything about my neck and back...that's because she is an ENT! She never even touched on the fact that I have fibromyalgia...it was diagnosed by 3 different rheumatologists! I had a residual functional capacity test done by a physical therapist...she deemed me less than sedentary. The judge said a physical theripist is not a credible source...SERIOUSLY...who better than a phyisical theripist to know how a body is supposed to move and function? There was also one from my rheumatologist that she ignored. I think she was looking for more evidence for my arthritis and fibromyalgia than what I had...I am sorry...I am not working and can not afford all the doctor bills to support her decisions. What makes this so sad is...IT IS MY MONEY....I worked for it. I know people that have less issues than I have and they were approved for their Social Security disability and they aren't sitting at home doing nothing! Guess I just got the short straw when it came to the judge I got. Who says the judicial system is fair!
The worst. She has a 25 percent approval rating and should be investigated by HOCALJ.
The worst. She has a 25 percent approval rating and should be investigated by HOCALJ.
The worst. She has a 25 percent approval rating and should be investigated by HOCALJ.
Yet another low pay anti-claimant ALJ at the Las Vegas OHO/ODAR. I'm sure she laughs with Norman Bennett and Gary Vanderhoof on how many claimants they deny and how they don't even read the medical records. "Hey we just put the denial in and the decision writers will find what they need to adhere to our decision" What a joke SSA has become. It needs TOTAL reform. To allow lifetime appointments of biased republican old farts like Cynthia Hoover, Norman Bennett, and Gary Vanderhoof is a disgrace to the American taxpayer.
Yet another low pay anti-claimant ALJ at the Las Vegas OHO/ODAR. I'm sure she laughs with Norman Bennett and Gary Vanderhoof on how many claimants they deny and how they don't even read the medical records. "Hey we just put the denial in and the decision writers will find what they need to adhere to our decision" What a joke SSA has become. It needs TOTAL reform. To allow lifetime appointments of biased republican old farts like Cynthia Hoover, Norman Bennett, and Gary Vanderhoof is a disgrace to the American taxpayer.
Yet another low pay anti-claimant ALJ at the Las Vegas OHO/ODAR. I'm sure she laughs with Norman Bennett and Gary Vanderhoof on how many claimants they deny and how they don't even read the medical records. "Hey we just put the denial in and the decision writers will find what they need to adhere to our decision" What a joke SSA has become. It needs TOTAL reform. To allow lifetime appointments of biased republican old farts like Cynthia Hoover, Norman Bennett, and Gary Vanderhoof is a disgrace to the American taxpayer.
Instead of complaining about the judges, perhaps we should focus on all the representative fraud. There is an attorney in St. George, Utah who repeatedly manufactures diagnoses, such as fibromyalgia, by telling his clients to tell their medical providers what to write in their medical notes to prove up a condition. This type of legal practice is fraught with impropriety, as it lends a taint to medical diagnoses that are supposed to be issued by doctors or other medical providers, without a taint on them by that attorney. He additionally knows that most of his clients are working "under the table," but usually states that it is just 20 to 21 hours per week. He leaves out their other income time and time again, because he obviously believes that everyone who works "under the table" in Southern Utah also deserves to collect Social Security benefits. He gets away with this fraud and malpractice again and again. The taxpayers should be outraged by his conduct, as should the State Bar of Utah. At this very moment, thousands who work "under the table" near Zion and that area, get Social Security benefits for "complete and total disability," too, which is Social Security fraud, because he represented them. He could not care less whether people are disabled or not. He will go to whatever unethical lengths necessary to get you assessed with conditions you do not even have, such as fibromyalgia, schizophrenia, etc....
Instead of complaining about the judges, perhaps we should focus on all the representative fraud. There is an attorney in St. George, Utah who repeatedly manufactures diagnoses, such as fibromyalgia, by telling his clients to tell their medical providers what to write in their medical notes to prove up a condition. This type of legal practice is fraught with impropriety, as it lends a taint to medical diagnoses that are supposed to be issued by doctors or other medical providers, without a taint on them by that attorney. He additionally knows that most of his clients are working "under the table," but usually states that it is just 20 to 21 hours per week. He leaves out their other income time and time again, because he obviously believes that everyone who works "under the table" in Southern Utah also deserves to collect Social Security benefits. He gets away with this fraud and malpractice again and again. The taxpayers should be outraged by his conduct, as should the State Bar of Utah. At this very moment, thousands who work "under the table" near Zion and that area, get Social Security benefits for "complete and total disability," too, which is Social Security fraud, because he represented them. He could not care less whether people are disabled or not. He will go to whatever unethical lengths necessary to get you assessed with conditions you do not even have, such as fibromyalgia, schizophrenia, etc....
Instead of complaining about the judges, perhaps we should focus on all the representative fraud. There is an attorney in St. George, Utah who repeatedly manufactures diagnoses, such as fibromyalgia, by telling his clients to tell their medical providers what to write in their medical notes to prove up a condition. This type of legal practice is fraught with impropriety, as it lends a taint to medical diagnoses that are supposed to be issued by doctors or other medical providers, without a taint on them by that attorney. He additionally knows that most of his clients are working "under the table," but usually states that it is just 20 to 21 hours per week. He leaves out their other income time and time again, because he obviously believes that everyone who works "under the table" in Southern Utah also deserves to collect Social Security benefits. He gets away with this fraud and malpractice again and again. The taxpayers should be outraged by his conduct, as should the State Bar of Utah. At this very moment, thousands who work "under the table" near Zion and that area, get Social Security benefits for "complete and total disability," too, which is Social Security fraud, because he represented them. He could not care less whether people are disabled or not. He will go to whatever unethical lengths necessary to get you assessed with conditions you do not even have, such as fibromyalgia, schizophrenia, etc....
I just had my hearing with Cynthia R Hoover. I am very disappointed . I have many various very serious health issues. I have not been able to work since 2016. I am an older female. She disapproved my case. I do not understand why. I have worked hard my whole life and would continue to work if it was possible. I have never abused the system. I would not have applied for disability if I was not disabled. Now I am living in poverty, in pain, in disbelief and very disgusted with the US Social Security system. What has become of the US that it takes care of all other countries and does NOT take care of the American people who need help.
I just had my hearing with Cynthia R Hoover. I am very disappointed . I have many various very serious health issues. I have not been able to work since 2016. I am an older female. She disapproved my case. I do not understand why. I have worked hard my whole life and would continue to work if it was possible. I have never abused the system. I would not have applied for disability if I was not disabled. Now I am living in poverty, in pain, in disbelief and very disgusted with the US Social Security system. What has become of the US that it takes care of all other countries and does NOT take care of the American people who need help.
I just had my hearing with Cynthia R Hoover. I am very disappointed . I have many various very serious health issues. I have not been able to work since 2016. I am an older female. She disapproved my case. I do not understand why. I have worked hard my whole life and would continue to work if it was possible. I have never abused the system. I would not have applied for disability if I was not disabled. Now I am living in poverty, in pain, in disbelief and very disgusted with the US Social Security system. What has become of the US that it takes care of all other countries and does NOT take care of the American people who need help.
Mr Jenkins, it appears you have made the choice throughout a good portion of your working life to hold positions within the scope of Public Servant. Including receiving your education as the result of service for the people of the United States. You are in fact a employee of the tax payers and citizens of the United States. A public Servant. As a employee it’s apparent we the citizens and tax payers find your conduct, your attitude, and your ability to perform your duties as defined to be sadly lacking. Please make every effort to rectify theses issues, or seek other employment . It would be a shame to have to have your service terminated by public forum, petition, and public demand. In other words, by the people who employ you, the people you in fact are employed by and work for.
Mr Jenkins, it appears you have made the choice throughout a good portion of your working life to hold positions within the scope of Public Servant. Including receiving your education as the result of service for the people of the United States. You are in fact a employee of the tax payers and citizens of the United States. A public Servant. As a employee it’s apparent we the citizens and tax payers find your conduct, your attitude, and your ability to perform your duties as defined to be sadly lacking. Please make every effort to rectify theses issues, or seek other employment . It would be a shame to have to have your service terminated by public forum, petition, and public demand. In other words, by the people who employ you, the people you in fact are employed by and work for.
Mr Jenkins, it appears you have made the choice throughout a good portion of your working life to hold positions within the scope of Public Servant. Including receiving your education as the result of service for the people of the United States. You are in fact a employee of the tax payers and citizens of the United States. A public Servant. As a employee it’s apparent we the citizens and tax payers find your conduct, your attitude, and your ability to perform your duties as defined to be sadly lacking. Please make every effort to rectify theses issues, or seek other employment . It would be a shame to have to have your service terminated by public forum, petition, and public demand. In other words, by the people who employ you, the people you in fact are employed by and work for.
He is negligent and has an agenda that is also bias.
He is negligent and has an agenda that is also bias.
He is negligent and has an agenda that is also bias.
Good evening. As I sit here looking at my documents over and over. I do not understand how is it that you denied my case (September 22, 2011) I had applied on 2009. As a public servant you are responsible for taking a look at alol documents pertaining to any case. I'm 47 and still waiting at federal court. My lawyers dropped me and couldn't find any in Nevada to represent me at that level. Bipolar anxiety depression alone should've qualified me for disability according to the law. Not to mention a broken neck lower back sugery and left rotor cuff surgery due to my accident back in 2006. I have a pending right rotor cuff, neck c1 replacement and a disk replacement. How in the world did you come to this decision? My family has suffered financially due to your lackluster review of my case. I've written to my congressman and all they tell me is I have to wait, no thanks to your poor judgment.
Good evening. As I sit here looking at my documents over and over. I do not understand how is it that you denied my case (September 22, 2011) I had applied on 2009. As a public servant you are responsible for taking a look at alol documents pertaining to any case. I'm 47 and still waiting at federal court. My lawyers dropped me and couldn't find any in Nevada to represent me at that level. Bipolar anxiety depression alone should've qualified me for disability according to the law. Not to mention a broken neck lower back sugery and left rotor cuff surgery due to my accident back in 2006. I have a pending right rotor cuff, neck c1 replacement and a disk replacement. How in the world did you come to this decision? My family has suffered financially due to your lackluster review of my case. I've written to my congressman and all they tell me is I have to wait, no thanks to your poor judgment.
Good evening. As I sit here looking at my documents over and over. I do not understand how is it that you denied my case (September 22, 2011) I had applied on 2009. As a public servant you are responsible for taking a look at alol documents pertaining to any case. I'm 47 and still waiting at federal court. My lawyers dropped me and couldn't find any in Nevada to represent me at that level. Bipolar anxiety depression alone should've qualified me for disability according to the law. Not to mention a broken neck lower back sugery and left rotor cuff surgery due to my accident back in 2006. I have a pending right rotor cuff, neck c1 replacement and a disk replacement. How in the world did you come to this decision? My family has suffered financially due to your lackluster review of my case. I've written to my congressman and all they tell me is I have to wait, no thanks to your poor judgment.
Mr Jenkins, You seem to be pre occupied with a persons credibility rather than the facts of the injured person, who has ben waiting 3 yrs and 6 months to see you. It should not matter if a person who works 12 to 13 hrs a day 6 days a week has a couple of beers. This person is there for you to look at his doctors notes and all relevant materials that prove this person is permentaly disabled or not..It is not your decision to make if the person has a prescription drug abuse problem. Look at why the person can not work. Don't give the quack doctors from social security more weight than an 75yr old md who has seen it all. We the people give you a job and we the people can take it away.if some one is unable to work and wants to drink a case of beer a day, it should not bother you. again look as to why the person is before you. You have quite the history of beating up on people who drink..Go to Utah where you should be more at home. Stop trying tp play god.
Mr Jenkins, You seem to be pre occupied with a persons credibility rather than the facts of the injured person, who has ben waiting 3 yrs and 6 months to see you. It should not matter if a person who works 12 to 13 hrs a day 6 days a week has a couple of beers. This person is there for you to look at his doctors notes and all relevant materials that prove this person is permentaly disabled or not..It is not your decision to make if the person has a prescription drug abuse problem. Look at why the person can not work. Don't give the quack doctors from social security more weight than an 75yr old md who has seen it all. We the people give you a job and we the people can take it away.if some one is unable to work and wants to drink a case of beer a day, it should not bother you. again look as to why the person is before you. You have quite the history of beating up on people who drink..Go to Utah where you should be more at home. Stop trying tp play god.
Mr Jenkins, You seem to be pre occupied with a persons credibility rather than the facts of the injured person, who has ben waiting 3 yrs and 6 months to see you. It should not matter if a person who works 12 to 13 hrs a day 6 days a week has a couple of beers. This person is there for you to look at his doctors notes and all relevant materials that prove this person is permentaly disabled or not..It is not your decision to make if the person has a prescription drug abuse problem. Look at why the person can not work. Don't give the quack doctors from social security more weight than an 75yr old md who has seen it all. We the people give you a job and we the people can take it away.if some one is unable to work and wants to drink a case of beer a day, it should not bother you. again look as to why the person is before you. You have quite the history of beating up on people who drink..Go to Utah where you should be more at home. Stop trying tp play god.
Yesterday i had judge jenkins for my disability hearing. I am 100percent disabled veteran because of complications of having cancer from contaminated water i recieved while in the marines. At the beginning of the hearing he said you know this has nothing to do with what you are filing for today. I said yes i know that. So after some time goes by he starts by saying why are you 100 percent if you are in remission and brings it up again as if i shouldn't be getting this money and goes on about it. Now like i said at the beginning he said this has nothing to do with your case but yet he harps on it. Little does he know it's not the cancer itself it's what the cancer has done to me permanently. Like having my appendix and my gall bladder removed. And my ***** is deformed and permanently damaged to the point of no more using it and taking 15 minutes to pee. My **** *** has all abnormalities all over it. And the cancer came back for a second time. Then he gets mad because my wife is also not working. Her brother and father recently died and she has been very depressed. She is from Romania and has worked 9 out of 10 years since living in the U.S. But he knows nothing of these things. This was the worst day i have ever had because i couldn't defend myself.
Yesterday i had judge jenkins for my disability hearing. I am 100percent disabled veteran because of complications of having cancer from contaminated water i recieved while in the marines. At the beginning of the hearing he said you know this has nothing to do with what you are filing for today. I said yes i know that. So after some time goes by he starts by saying why are you 100 percent if you are in remission and brings it up again as if i shouldn't be getting this money and goes on about it. Now like i said at the beginning he said this has nothing to do with your case but yet he harps on it. Little does he know it's not the cancer itself it's what the cancer has done to me permanently. Like having my appendix and my gall bladder removed. And my ***** is deformed and permanently damaged to the point of no more using it and taking 15 minutes to pee. My **** *** has all abnormalities all over it. And the cancer came back for a second time. Then he gets mad because my wife is also not working. Her brother and father recently died and she has been very depressed. She is from Romania and has worked 9 out of 10 years since living in the U.S. But he knows nothing of these things. This was the worst day i have ever had because i couldn't defend myself.
Yesterday i had judge jenkins for my disability hearing. I am 100percent disabled veteran because of complications of having cancer from contaminated water i recieved while in the marines. At the beginning of the hearing he said you know this has nothing to do with what you are filing for today. I said yes i know that. So after some time goes by he starts by saying why are you 100 percent if you are in remission and brings it up again as if i shouldn't be getting this money and goes on about it. Now like i said at the beginning he said this has nothing to do with your case but yet he harps on it. Little does he know it's not the cancer itself it's what the cancer has done to me permanently. Like having my appendix and my gall bladder removed. And my ***** is deformed and permanently damaged to the point of no more using it and taking 15 minutes to pee. My **** *** has all abnormalities all over it. And the cancer came back for a second time. Then he gets mad because my wife is also not working. Her brother and father recently died and she has been very depressed. She is from Romania and has worked 9 out of 10 years since living in the U.S. But he knows nothing of these things. This was the worst day i have ever had because i couldn't defend myself.
Yesterday i wrote something about Jenkins and it said after that someone would email me. No one has emailed me. It doesn't matter because i am putting in a complaint to ssdi about how he treated me.
Yesterday i wrote something about Jenkins and it said after that someone would email me. No one has emailed me. It doesn't matter because i am putting in a complaint to ssdi about how he treated me.
Yesterday i wrote something about Jenkins and it said after that someone would email me. No one has emailed me. It doesn't matter because i am putting in a complaint to ssdi about how he treated me.
I had a alj hearing with this devil dog judge, but was also denied disability benefits. The previous comment about this judge is accurate.
I had a alj hearing with this devil dog judge, but was also denied disability benefits. The previous comment about this judge is accurate.
I had a alj hearing with this devil dog judge, but was also denied disability benefits. The previous comment about this judge is accurate.
For a judge to watch you cry and break down in court over something and the judge continue to do the same **** by ignoring the claimant and denying the ssi/ssdi. Just another statistical old white male judge with a 36% favorable approval rate. The judge don’t care about you or your claim, he only wants to keep his job and his paycheck.
For a judge to watch you cry and break down in court over something and the judge continue to do the same **** by ignoring the claimant and denying the ssi/ssdi. Just another statistical old white male judge with a 36% favorable approval rate. The judge don’t care about you or your claim, he only wants to keep his job and his paycheck.
For a judge to watch you cry and break down in court over something and the judge continue to do the same **** by ignoring the claimant and denying the ssi/ssdi. Just another statistical old white male judge with a 36% favorable approval rate. The judge don’t care about you or your claim, he only wants to keep his job and his paycheck.
Has to be the worst Judge I've ever come across in NV. Their alleged "expert" was nearly an hour late and he was ALL peaches and cream with her. I wasn't even put on the calendar for the hearing, and the wannabe rent-a-cop at the door in his rubber gloves and magic wand didn't want to let me in. I sat in the waiting room for 50 minutes before anybody spoke to me. Judge Jenkins flunky called me, but somebody needs to tell these ****** that when you're dealing with the hearing impaired/deaf you need to speak up. He wanted to waste my time lecturing me on representation and wanted me to review THEIR file. My file and their file are two different things. He also had his flunky take my sugar-free Powerade out of the room. Not only out of the room, out in the hallway, between the bathrooms, on top of a water fountain. Somebody could have put something in it, spit in it, drank out of it. I'm filing a Judicial Discipline Complaint and taking my case to District Court. This **** is truly unfit to be on the bench. His attitude and tone of voice are of the worst I've ever seen. There's a statute on that specific demeanor. The Barney Fife knock-off at the door has the very same demeanor and disposition. Neither of them have any business dealing with the impaired and disabled. BOTH should be decommissioned ASAP! IF either of them call themselves MEN, what a disgrace to the gender, they're both ZERO's! And Lisa Rhodes is as incompetent as they come. That warrants a complaint of waste and abuse. Overpaid and underworked.
Has to be the worst Judge I've ever come across in NV. Their alleged "expert" was nearly an hour late and he was ALL peaches and cream with her. I wasn't even put on the calendar for the hearing, and the wannabe rent-a-cop at the door in his rubber gloves and magic wand didn't want to let me in. I sat in the waiting room for 50 minutes before anybody spoke to me. Judge Jenkins flunky called me, but somebody needs to tell these ****** that when you're dealing with the hearing impaired/deaf you need to speak up. He wanted to waste my time lecturing me on representation and wanted me to review THEIR file. My file and their file are two different things. He also had his flunky take my sugar-free Powerade out of the room. Not only out of the room, out in the hallway, between the bathrooms, on top of a water fountain. Somebody could have put something in it, spit in it, drank out of it. I'm filing a Judicial Discipline Complaint and taking my case to District Court. This **** is truly unfit to be on the bench. His attitude and tone of voice are of the worst I've ever seen. There's a statute on that specific demeanor. The Barney Fife knock-off at the door has the very same demeanor and disposition. Neither of them have any business dealing with the impaired and disabled. BOTH should be decommissioned ASAP! IF either of them call themselves MEN, what a disgrace to the gender, they're both ZERO's! And Lisa Rhodes is as incompetent as they come. That warrants a complaint of waste and abuse. Overpaid and underworked.
Has to be the worst Judge I've ever come across in NV. Their alleged "expert" was nearly an hour late and he was ALL peaches and cream with her. I wasn't even put on the calendar for the hearing, and the wannabe rent-a-cop at the door in his rubber gloves and magic wand didn't want to let me in. I sat in the waiting room for 50 minutes before anybody spoke to me. Judge Jenkins flunky called me, but somebody needs to tell these ****** that when you're dealing with the hearing impaired/deaf you need to speak up. He wanted to waste my time lecturing me on representation and wanted me to review THEIR file. My file and their file are two different things. He also had his flunky take my sugar-free Powerade out of the room. Not only out of the room, out in the hallway, between the bathrooms, on top of a water fountain. Somebody could have put something in it, spit in it, drank out of it. I'm filing a Judicial Discipline Complaint and taking my case to District Court. This **** is truly unfit to be on the bench. His attitude and tone of voice are of the worst I've ever seen. There's a statute on that specific demeanor. The Barney Fife knock-off at the door has the very same demeanor and disposition. Neither of them have any business dealing with the impaired and disabled. BOTH should be decommissioned ASAP! IF either of them call themselves MEN, what a disgrace to the gender, they're both ZERO's! And Lisa Rhodes is as incompetent as they come. That warrants a complaint of waste and abuse. Overpaid and underworked.
Finally Had my hearing on 4/4/18 with Judge Jenkins with the Las Vegas ODAR Office. My file has been in their office since 7/27/16. In July of 2017 I finally received my date for my hearing. 11/27/17 is the date scheduled.......yes, the Monday after Thanksgiving. So, after waiting anxiously for over 480 days, they call and cancel it on Black Friday.....yes, the day before my hearing basically. Do you think I was put back on the schedule right away? Nope!!!!! Had to wait 5 more months for my hearing. As far as Judge Jenkins, he was professional and courteous........hearing lasted 30-40 mins. My attorney thought it went well. My file is waiting for a Decision Writer as I write this. So my only real gripe is the cancellation of my Nov hearing and not being expedited automatically. As of todays date , my file has been with Las Vegas ODAR for 659 days. Im hoping for a good outcome.
Finally Had my hearing on 4/4/18 with Judge Jenkins with the Las Vegas ODAR Office. My file has been in their office since 7/27/16. In July of 2017 I finally received my date for my hearing. 11/27/17 is the date scheduled.......yes, the Monday after Thanksgiving. So, after waiting anxiously for over 480 days, they call and cancel it on Black Friday.....yes, the day before my hearing basically. Do you think I was put back on the schedule right away? Nope!!!!! Had to wait 5 more months for my hearing. As far as Judge Jenkins, he was professional and courteous........hearing lasted 30-40 mins. My attorney thought it went well. My file is waiting for a Decision Writer as I write this. So my only real gripe is the cancellation of my Nov hearing and not being expedited automatically. As of todays date , my file has been with Las Vegas ODAR for 659 days. Im hoping for a good outcome.
Finally Had my hearing on 4/4/18 with Judge Jenkins with the Las Vegas ODAR Office. My file has been in their office since 7/27/16. In July of 2017 I finally received my date for my hearing. 11/27/17 is the date scheduled.......yes, the Monday after Thanksgiving. So, after waiting anxiously for over 480 days, they call and cancel it on Black Friday.....yes, the day before my hearing basically. Do you think I was put back on the schedule right away? Nope!!!!! Had to wait 5 more months for my hearing. As far as Judge Jenkins, he was professional and courteous........hearing lasted 30-40 mins. My attorney thought it went well. My file is waiting for a Decision Writer as I write this. So my only real gripe is the cancellation of my Nov hearing and not being expedited automatically. As of todays date , my file has been with Las Vegas ODAR for 659 days. Im hoping for a good outcome.
I’m still surprised that the SSA still continue to have this incompetence ***** making decisions on disability cases. It would be a great benefit to the general public to remove and permanently retire this *** from the bench.
I’m still surprised that the SSA still continue to have this incompetence ***** making decisions on disability cases. It would be a great benefit to the general public to remove and permanently retire this *** from the bench.
I’m still surprised that the SSA still continue to have this incompetence ***** making decisions on disability cases. It would be a great benefit to the general public to remove and permanently retire this *** from the bench.
I feel he was unfair didn't look at my new records he based hisdecision on the decision that was made in 2012 which I feel is wrong I do believe the judge has discriminated against me I think he is wrong and he never look at all the evidence he is got to be the worst judge possible why is he even still on the bench
I feel he was unfair didn't look at my new records he based hisdecision on the decision that was made in 2012 which I feel is wrong I do believe the judge has discriminated against me I think he is wrong and he never look at all the evidence he is got to be the worst judge possible why is he even still on the bench
I feel he was unfair didn't look at my new records he based hisdecision on the decision that was made in 2012 which I feel is wrong I do believe the judge has discriminated against me I think he is wrong and he never look at all the evidence he is got to be the worst judge possible why is he even still on the bench
Unfair he shows no mercy on anybody very unfair He didn't look at all my proof I disagree with judge he is prejudice should not be on bench
Unfair he shows no mercy on anybody very unfair He didn't look at all my proof I disagree with judge he is prejudice should not be on bench
Unfair he shows no mercy on anybody very unfair He didn't look at all my proof I disagree with judge he is prejudice should not be on bench
I had read these comments prior to being in front of Judge Jenkins, and was expecting something different than what I experienced. I found Judge Jenkins to be a normal, no nonsense kind of individual. I did not feel pre-judged, nor did I feel intimidated by his demeanor. As to the vocational expert, again, I did not find her to be adversarial either.
I had read these comments prior to being in front of Judge Jenkins, and was expecting something different than what I experienced. I found Judge Jenkins to be a normal, no nonsense kind of individual. I did not feel pre-judged, nor did I feel intimidated by his demeanor. As to the vocational expert, again, I did not find her to be adversarial either.
I had read these comments prior to being in front of Judge Jenkins, and was expecting something different than what I experienced. I found Judge Jenkins to be a normal, no nonsense kind of individual. I did not feel pre-judged, nor did I feel intimidated by his demeanor. As to the vocational expert, again, I did not find her to be adversarial either.
Due to corona, I agreed to do my hearing on the phone.it was supposed to take place at 3 but was delayed.we started at about 430 so I guess the judge was grumpy from the get go because he had to go past 5.this was a nightmare.the judge accused me of things that weren't true and kept trying to catch me in lies.he wasn't successful but his tone and the way he spoke to me triggered me because I just got out of domestic violence situation.he wouldn't let me speak up and I felt afraid of him I was crying and he didnt care.i also noticed the tone was normal when he spoke to lawyer and vocational lady.i have mental and physical reasons why I cant work anymore.ive worked my whole life since 16.i am about to turn 50..the jobs they chose for me to do are impossible for me to try. I dont think I got a fair shot from beginning. Also side note to anyone going for disability Please read ur medical files because they can be incorrect. Doctors writing down tests they never did during ur visit.most time doctors dont evenvtough u yet they write down they did a test during appointment. I'm awaiting appeals now.God Bless
Due to corona, I agreed to do my hearing on the phone.it was supposed to take place at 3 but was delayed.we started at about 430 so I guess the judge was grumpy from the get go because he had to go past 5.this was a nightmare.the judge accused me of things that weren't true and kept trying to catch me in lies.he wasn't successful but his tone and the way he spoke to me triggered me because I just got out of domestic violence situation.he wouldn't let me speak up and I felt afraid of him I was crying and he didnt care.i also noticed the tone was normal when he spoke to lawyer and vocational lady.i have mental and physical reasons why I cant work anymore.ive worked my whole life since 16.i am about to turn 50..the jobs they chose for me to do are impossible for me to try. I dont think I got a fair shot from beginning. Also side note to anyone going for disability Please read ur medical files because they can be incorrect. Doctors writing down tests they never did during ur visit.most time doctors dont evenvtough u yet they write down they did a test during appointment. I'm awaiting appeals now.God Bless
generic viagra online canadian pharmacy viagra how to get viagra without a doctor
generic viagra online canadian pharmacy viagra how to get viagra without a doctor
Rude and bias
Rude and bias
Rude and bias
The best judge in the state of Nevada.
The best judge in the state of Nevada.
The best judge in the state of Nevada.
The best judge in the state of Nevada. The above comments written by SSA stooge or ALJ himself. Either way its a lie
The best judge in the state of Nevada. The above comments written by SSA stooge or ALJ himself. Either way its a lie
The best judge in the state of Nevada. The above comments written by SSA stooge or ALJ himself. Either way its a lie
Great Judge. Very fair and conducts every hearing in a very consistent manner. Sad that he is retiring.
Great Judge. Very fair and conducts every hearing in a very consistent manner. Sad that he is retiring.
Great Judge. Very fair and conducts every hearing in a very consistent manner. Sad that he is retiring.
I can't imagine a more biased, uninformed judge. How do people like him get promoted. Nobody can stand him.
I can't imagine a more biased, uninformed judge. How do people like him get promoted. Nobody can stand him.
I can't imagine a more biased, uninformed judge. How do people like him get promoted. Nobody can stand him.
I love you Judge Loughry...;)
I love you Judge Loughry...;)
I love you Judge Loughry...;)
Thorough and fair. Judge Troope took time to carefully review entire file and followed procedures. Also very compassionate. Grateful to have met her.
Thorough and fair. Judge Troope took time to carefully review entire file and followed procedures. Also very compassionate. Grateful to have met her.
Thorough and fair. Judge Troope took time to carefully review entire file and followed procedures. Also very compassionate. Grateful to have met her.
This judge was very kind and thorough at my hearing. She seemed very fair and caring.
This judge was very kind and thorough at my hearing. She seemed very fair and caring.
This judge was very kind and thorough at my hearing. She seemed very fair and caring.
The guy denied my claim, based on not believing the psychiatric evidence that clearly showed my severe depression and my inabiity to work.Funny how a guy that needs a psychiatrist himself gets to deny my psychiatric case
The guy denied my claim, based on not believing the psychiatric evidence that clearly showed my severe depression and my inabiity to work.Funny how a guy that needs a psychiatrist himself gets to deny my psychiatric case
The guy denied my claim, based on not believing the psychiatric evidence that clearly showed my severe depression and my inabiity to work.Funny how a guy that needs a psychiatrist himself gets to deny my psychiatric case
Judge Vanderhoof denied my case, I have medical evidence that shows 3 different dissabilities,Essential tremors,Anxiety disorder and Degenerative Arthritis and he still denied me. When I did receive my letter of denial he failed to mention in the report my Degenerative Arthritis which would have qualified me. I have trouble walking,sitting,standing because of my arthritis,my body is in a constent tremor which keeps me from holding an eating utensil or a pen to sign my name if I need to,my Anxiety disorder is because I cannot function like I use to. Why I was denied I will never know.
Judge Vanderhoof denied my case, I have medical evidence that shows 3 different dissabilities,Essential tremors,Anxiety disorder and Degenerative Arthritis and he still denied me. When I did receive my letter of denial he failed to mention in the report my Degenerative Arthritis which would have qualified me. I have trouble walking,sitting,standing because of my arthritis,my body is in a constent tremor which keeps me from holding an eating utensil or a pen to sign my name if I need to,my Anxiety disorder is because I cannot function like I use to. Why I was denied I will never know.
Judge Vanderhoof denied my case, I have medical evidence that shows 3 different dissabilities,Essential tremors,Anxiety disorder and Degenerative Arthritis and he still denied me. When I did receive my letter of denial he failed to mention in the report my Degenerative Arthritis which would have qualified me. I have trouble walking,sitting,standing because of my arthritis,my body is in a constent tremor which keeps me from holding an eating utensil or a pen to sign my name if I need to,my Anxiety disorder is because I cannot function like I use to. Why I was denied I will never know.
Judge Vanderhoof statistically denies almost everyone. You are very unlucky if you have him. Apparently he is dumped in the Corpus Christi, Texas area so he does not deny everyone in San Antonio, Texas.
Judge Vanderhoof statistically denies almost everyone. You are very unlucky if you have him. Apparently he is dumped in the Corpus Christi, Texas area so he does not deny everyone in San Antonio, Texas.
Judge Vanderhoof statistically denies almost everyone. You are very unlucky if you have him. Apparently he is dumped in the Corpus Christi, Texas area so he does not deny everyone in San Antonio, Texas.
Wow I was sitting here reading everyone's comments about this ALJ I was denied also and I have stage 3 colon cancer and have a statement from my treating doctor stating I was permanently disable and he threw that out so I'm going through the appeal process I hope each and everyone of you guys appeal your cases because I don't think his decisions was the right decision on all of our cases
Wow I was sitting here reading everyone's comments about this ALJ I was denied also and I have stage 3 colon cancer and have a statement from my treating doctor stating I was permanently disable and he threw that out so I'm going through the appeal process I hope each and everyone of you guys appeal your cases because I don't think his decisions was the right decision on all of our cases
Wow I was sitting here reading everyone's comments about this ALJ I was denied also and I have stage 3 colon cancer and have a statement from my treating doctor stating I was permanently disable and he threw that out so I'm going through the appeal process I hope each and everyone of you guys appeal your cases because I don't think his decisions was the right decision on all of our cases
you have a better chance of winning the powerball than a favorable decision from him. completely dismissed all my dr diagnosis. you wouldnt win if you were just a head on a stick.
you have a better chance of winning the powerball than a favorable decision from him. completely dismissed all my dr diagnosis. you wouldnt win if you were just a head on a stick.
you have a better chance of winning the powerball than a favorable decision from him. completely dismissed all my dr diagnosis. you wouldnt win if you were just a head on a stick.
Sorry. Him and his vocational expert
Sorry. Him and his vocational expert
Sorry. Him and his vocational expert
I find him to be conservative but very fair. I have been a disability lawyer since 1984. He knows the law and follows it.
I find him to be conservative but very fair. I have been a disability lawyer since 1984. He knows the law and follows it.
I find him to be conservative but very fair. I have been a disability lawyer since 1984. He knows the law and follows it.
Is he in Las Vegas now? I have a May 2016 hearing with a Judge Gary L. Vanderhoof in Las Vegas.
Is he in Las Vegas now? I have a May 2016 hearing with a Judge Gary L. Vanderhoof in Las Vegas.
Is he in Las Vegas now? I have a May 2016 hearing with a Judge Gary L. Vanderhoof in Las Vegas.
Denied my claim even though labs and imaging clearly indicated my medical issues. My medical issues qualified. The judge stated that "Any reasonable person with these diagnosis would have the symptoms applicant claims to have, however" he did not lend me or 5 of my physicians credibility. I dont have anything in my past that would blemish my credibility. SSDI docs diagnosis were in agreement with my doctors. I sent it to AC, Ac took over a year. When I contacted my congressman to expedite the review, they did. They decided to quickest thing to do was deny my appeal WITHOUT reviewing it. That taught me a lesson. BTW no attorney in the US will take the case at that point... not even the attorneys SSDI refers to you.
Denied my claim even though labs and imaging clearly indicated my medical issues. My medical issues qualified. The judge stated that "Any reasonable person with these diagnosis would have the symptoms applicant claims to have, however" he did not lend me or 5 of my physicians credibility. I dont have anything in my past that would blemish my credibility. SSDI docs diagnosis were in agreement with my doctors. I sent it to AC, Ac took over a year. When I contacted my congressman to expedite the review, they did. They decided to quickest thing to do was deny my appeal WITHOUT reviewing it. That taught me a lesson. BTW no attorney in the US will take the case at that point... not even the attorneys SSDI refers to you.
Denied my claim even though labs and imaging clearly indicated my medical issues. My medical issues qualified. The judge stated that "Any reasonable person with these diagnosis would have the symptoms applicant claims to have, however" he did not lend me or 5 of my physicians credibility. I dont have anything in my past that would blemish my credibility. SSDI docs diagnosis were in agreement with my doctors. I sent it to AC, Ac took over a year. When I contacted my congressman to expedite the review, they did. They decided to quickest thing to do was deny my appeal WITHOUT reviewing it. That taught me a lesson. BTW no attorney in the US will take the case at that point... not even the attorneys SSDI refers to you.
I did mass settings with vanderhoof in Oregon and did over 50 cases in a month with the San Antonio judges. With him it is expert lottery. If the TP gives a detailed listing report you are OK. Likes listings. Hates title 16 cases . Uses experts over the phone and will rely almost exclusively on expert. A number if my cases went to FDC and were reversed or remanded. One Oregon case was remanded and amazingly my client moved to San Antonio where he got Vanderhoof again. WE won on remand based on good FDC cred findings. key to Vanderhoof is do your work regarding the listings and grids. Those are the places where he will work for the claimant.
I did mass settings with vanderhoof in Oregon and did over 50 cases in a month with the San Antonio judges. With him it is expert lottery. If the TP gives a detailed listing report you are OK. Likes listings. Hates title 16 cases . Uses experts over the phone and will rely almost exclusively on expert. A number if my cases went to FDC and were reversed or remanded. One Oregon case was remanded and amazingly my client moved to San Antonio where he got Vanderhoof again. WE won on remand based on good FDC cred findings. key to Vanderhoof is do your work regarding the listings and grids. Those are the places where he will work for the claimant.
I did mass settings with vanderhoof in Oregon and did over 50 cases in a month with the San Antonio judges. With him it is expert lottery. If the TP gives a detailed listing report you are OK. Likes listings. Hates title 16 cases . Uses experts over the phone and will rely almost exclusively on expert. A number if my cases went to FDC and were reversed or remanded. One Oregon case was remanded and amazingly my client moved to San Antonio where he got Vanderhoof again. WE won on remand based on good FDC cred findings. key to Vanderhoof is do your work regarding the listings and grids. Those are the places where he will work for the claimant.
Guy is 82 years old and basically denies everyone.
Guy is 82 years old and basically denies everyone.
Guy is 82 years old and basically denies everyone.