LOS-ANGELES-WEST, California Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Los-angeles-west, CALIFORNIA, 22 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Los-angeles-west, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 20 months. The average case processing time in Los-angeles-west is 598 days. The Los-angeles-west average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 44%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Los-angeles-west ODAR office was last updated on 06/26/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time | Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ | Cases Dismissed | Cases Approved | Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES WEST | 22 | 20.0 months | 598 days | 2.8 | 22% | 44% | 34% |
| CALIFORNIA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time | Depositions Per Day Per ALJ | Average Processing Time | Cases Pending | Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person | Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.00 months | 2.76 | 598 days | 3617 | 2197 | 417 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 33
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| John W Wojciechowski | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| April M Wexler | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| Lawrence D Wheeler | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ena Weathers | 34% | 27% | 39% |
| Elizabeth Watson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Melissa Warner | 48% | 27% | 25% |
| Lisa D Thompson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michelle Thompson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Regina L Sleater | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Robin Rosenbluth | 49% | 20% | 31% |
| Gail Reich | 44% | 27% | 29% |
| Sally C Reason | 31% | 37% | 31% |
| Moises Penalver | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Lisa B Martin | 41% | 22% | 37% |
| Joseph Lisiecki | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Elizabeth R Lishner | 48% | 22% | 30% |
| Zane A Lang | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Robert Iafe | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Susan Hoffman | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mark Hockensmith | 41% | 24% | 35% |
| Evelyn M Gunn | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John P Giannikas | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Dale A Garwal | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Loranzo Fleming | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Myriam C Fernandez Rice | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| Barbara Dunn | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sandra R DiMaggio Wallis | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| James Delphey | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Richard Breen | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Richard T Breen | 29% | 27% | 44% |
| Sherwin F Biesman | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Peter J Baum | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Betty Roberts Barbeito | 0% | 0% | 0% |
635 Comments
Very thorough but fair
Very thorough but fair
Very thorough but fair
The worst ALJ ever! If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw. She is not nice to client, rep, hearing recorder or any experts. She deffenetly uses her power in an abusive way.
The worst ALJ ever! If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw. She is not nice to client, rep, hearing recorder or any experts. She deffenetly uses her power in an abusive way.
The worst ALJ ever! If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw. She is not nice to client, rep, hearing recorder or any experts. She deffenetly uses her power in an abusive way.
She is rude, disrespectful and snotty to everyone. Not even close to being fair. Doesn't know what she is doing. Puts you through the ringer and then kicks you some more. Ridiculous is the best adjective to describe it.
She is rude, disrespectful and snotty to everyone. Not even close to being fair. Doesn't know what she is doing. Puts you through the ringer and then kicks you some more. Ridiculous is the best adjective to describe it.
She is rude, disrespectful and snotty to everyone. Not even close to being fair. Doesn't know what she is doing. Puts you through the ringer and then kicks you some more. Ridiculous is the best adjective to describe it.
For the person who commented, "If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw" actually is correct because when you apply for unemployment you are stating you can work but have no job and you are actively looking for one so, if you are collecting it and filing for disability, there is some fraudulent behavior going on. You can either work or you're disable. Be grateful the judge doesn’t cite you for lying in court.
For the person who commented, "If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw" actually is correct because when you apply for unemployment you are stating you can work but have no job and you are actively looking for one so, if you are collecting it and filing for disability, there is some fraudulent behavior going on. You can either work or you're disable. Be grateful the judge doesn’t cite you for lying in court.
For the person who commented, "If you are collecting unemployment, you might as well withdraw" actually is correct because when you apply for unemployment you are stating you can work but have no job and you are actively looking for one so, if you are collecting it and filing for disability, there is some fraudulent behavior going on. You can either work or you're disable. Be grateful the judge doesn’t cite you for lying in court.
To "An Observer of Comments": Your comments are very ill-informed. First, SSR 13-1p states, "[p]ossible examples of allegations that the Appeals Council will refer to the Division of Quality Service include, 'the ALJ is biased against claimants who receive workers compensation benefits or unemployment benefits' . . . ." Second, when an individual applies for unemployment benefits he/she is not saying that they are "ready, willing, and able" to perform work eight-hours a day, five-days per week -- the standard used by the SSA.
To "An Observer of Comments": Your comments are very ill-informed. First, SSR 13-1p states, "[p]ossible examples of allegations that the Appeals Council will refer to the Division of Quality Service include, 'the ALJ is biased against claimants who receive workers compensation benefits or unemployment benefits' . . . ." Second, when an individual applies for unemployment benefits he/she is not saying that they are "ready, willing, and able" to perform work eight-hours a day, five-days per week -- the standard used by the SSA.
To "An Observer of Comments": Your comments are very ill-informed. First, SSR 13-1p states, "[p]ossible examples of allegations that the Appeals Council will refer to the Division of Quality Service include, 'the ALJ is biased against claimants who receive workers compensation benefits or unemployment benefits' . . . ." Second, when an individual applies for unemployment benefits he/she is not saying that they are "ready, willing, and able" to perform work eight-hours a day, five-days per week -- the standard used by the SSA.
I am a disabled veteran rated at 100% PTSD, Panic Disorder, and major depression, and other things. Veteran's affairs added Individual Unemployability and Permanent & Total which means I am unable to work and that my condition is permanent and not going to get better. Had hearing this week. I hope all goes well. If I'm denied, I will be in shock, but I will take it to next level and appeal. I will post again when I receive my decision from her. I've worked hard hard all my life and fought for my country and I suffer everyday from war trauma. I felt uncomfortable in court and had extreme anxiety and depression the rest of the day from that experience.
I am a disabled veteran rated at 100% PTSD, Panic Disorder, and major depression, and other things. Veteran's affairs added Individual Unemployability and Permanent & Total which means I am unable to work and that my condition is permanent and not going to get better. Had hearing this week. I hope all goes well. If I'm denied, I will be in shock, but I will take it to next level and appeal. I will post again when I receive my decision from her. I've worked hard hard all my life and fought for my country and I suffer everyday from war trauma. I felt uncomfortable in court and had extreme anxiety and depression the rest of the day from that experience.
I am a disabled veteran rated at 100% PTSD, Panic Disorder, and major depression, and other things. Veteran's affairs added Individual Unemployability and Permanent & Total which means I am unable to work and that my condition is permanent and not going to get better. Had hearing this week. I hope all goes well. If I'm denied, I will be in shock, but I will take it to next level and appeal. I will post again when I receive my decision from her. I've worked hard hard all my life and fought for my country and I suffer everyday from war trauma. I felt uncomfortable in court and had extreme anxiety and depression the rest of the day from that experience.
Judge Barbeito presided over my case (remand)and I am thankful that she did. She was straight-forward and respectful allowing me, in company with my attorney, to address each issue fully. Finally, I knew my case had been heard.
Judge Barbeito presided over my case (remand)and I am thankful that she did. She was straight-forward and respectful allowing me, in company with my attorney, to address each issue fully. Finally, I knew my case had been heard.
Judge Barbeito presided over my case (remand)and I am thankful that she did. She was straight-forward and respectful allowing me, in company with my attorney, to address each issue fully. Finally, I knew my case had been heard.
Beneficial Location Hi gentleman the following transpire a number of web page link with the aim of represses information that will a person may possibly acquire positive yourselves. The Significance Verifying away from home. feckddddkada
Beneficial Location Hi gentleman the following transpire a number of web page link with the aim of represses information that will a person may possibly acquire positive yourselves. The Significance Verifying away from home. feckddddkada
Beneficial Location Hi gentleman the following transpire a number of web page link with the aim of represses information that will a person may possibly acquire positive yourselves. The Significance Verifying away from home. feckddddkada
Beneficial Location Hi gentleman the following transpire a number of web page link with the aim of represses information that will a person may possibly acquire positive yourselves. The Significance Verifying away from home. feckddddkada
Very good blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic. bkacgakdaced
Very good blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic. bkacgakdaced
Very good blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic. bkacgakdaced
Very good blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic. bkacgakdaced
I'm a lawyer who has attended thousands of hearings. This ALJ is the most disgusting excuse for a judge, let alone lawyer, I've ever met. I pray she will be removed from the bench.
I'm a lawyer who has attended thousands of hearings. This ALJ is the most disgusting excuse for a judge, let alone lawyer, I've ever met. I pray she will be removed from the bench.
I'm a lawyer who has attended thousands of hearings. This ALJ is the most disgusting excuse for a judge, let alone lawyer, I've ever met. I pray she will be removed from the bench.
I had to have 3 hearings. She was very thorough but fair. It took me 4 years but I got fully favorable.
I had to have 3 hearings. She was very thorough but fair. It took me 4 years but I got fully favorable.
I had to have 3 hearings. She was very thorough but fair. It took me 4 years but I got fully favorable.
Great Judge. 100% fair in my complex case. She made it possible for me to have surgery. I was in a really bad situation. She set up a re-evaluation date and provided enough time for surgical recovery. Oh yea.. I almost forgot. I am a Workers Comp claimant. Thank you Judge Betty Roberts Barbeito. You saved me !!
Great Judge. 100% fair in my complex case. She made it possible for me to have surgery. I was in a really bad situation. She set up a re-evaluation date and provided enough time for surgical recovery. Oh yea.. I almost forgot. I am a Workers Comp claimant. Thank you Judge Betty Roberts Barbeito. You saved me !!
Great Judge. 100% fair in my complex case. She made it possible for me to have surgery. I was in a really bad situation. She set up a re-evaluation date and provided enough time for surgical recovery. Oh yea.. I almost forgot. I am a Workers Comp claimant. Thank you Judge Betty Roberts Barbeito. You saved me !!
Judge Barbeito my name is Donald Hunt you presided over my case in Fresno as we were leaving you asked for some medical records pertaining to an incident where the Dr gave me Demerol and told my mother he was worried about me because my Cd4 counts were very low and my viral load extremely high and with my kidneys failing and I just got over a bad case of cellulitis which nearly turned into sepsis it's pertinent I get these records to you in a timely fashion but I have no car no way to pay for faxes since they are long distance and 1.59$ per page I need he
Judge Barbeito my name is Donald Hunt you presided over my case in Fresno as we were leaving you asked for some medical records pertaining to an incident where the Dr gave me Demerol and told my mother he was worried about me because my Cd4 counts were very low and my viral load extremely high and with my kidneys failing and I just got over a bad case of cellulitis which nearly turned into sepsis it's pertinent I get these records to you in a timely fashion but I have no car no way to pay for faxes since they are long distance and 1.59$ per page I need he
Judge Barbeito my name is Donald Hunt you presided over my case in Fresno as we were leaving you asked for some medical records pertaining to an incident where the Dr gave me Demerol and told my mother he was worried about me because my Cd4 counts were very low and my viral load extremely high and with my kidneys failing and I just got over a bad case of cellulitis which nearly turned into sepsis it's pertinent I get these records to you in a timely fashion but I have no car no way to pay for faxes since they are long distance and 1.59$ per page I need he
She not fair. If all these people say the same thing about herror why is she still a judge. Because she saving them money. Not everybody trying to get a free handout. I know I'm not. I hate to be in this situation. But my health problems got me here. I worked my butt off since 18. Sometimes 2 jobs at once. And now I get denied help by her. They say watch what we say. I don't care if she see this I want her to. Only wish cud be face to face. How do u sleep at night betty. When u knowingly ruin people lives. She didn't allow all my proof in. She omitted some of my proof. She called me a liar. How dare u. U are not God. But I have god.isaiah 13 vs.11. .
She not fair. If all these people say the same thing about herror why is she still a judge. Because she saving them money. Not everybody trying to get a free handout. I know I'm not. I hate to be in this situation. But my health problems got me here. I worked my butt off since 18. Sometimes 2 jobs at once. And now I get denied help by her. They say watch what we say. I don't care if she see this I want her to. Only wish cud be face to face. How do u sleep at night betty. When u knowingly ruin people lives. She didn't allow all my proof in. She omitted some of my proof. She called me a liar. How dare u. U are not God. But I have god.isaiah 13 vs.11. .
She not fair. If all these people say the same thing about herror why is she still a judge. Because she saving them money. Not everybody trying to get a free handout. I know I'm not. I hate to be in this situation. But my health problems got me here. I worked my butt off since 18. Sometimes 2 jobs at once. And now I get denied help by her. They say watch what we say. I don't care if she see this I want her to. Only wish cud be face to face. How do u sleep at night betty. When u knowingly ruin people lives. She didn't allow all my proof in. She omitted some of my proof. She called me a liar. How dare u. U are not God. But I have god.isaiah 13 vs.11. .
I am going to bring the truth bout you to light betty. I will go to the news or whoever will listen. U were not fair with me at all. There are people with less wrong with them than I have and got approved. I wish I cud be working cuz I hate our justice system. I'm against death penalty but that's another story. I can't complain to social security bout u betty cuz u in their pocket making 170,000 a year. Wow. I hope one day u get sick and need help. Don't think it can't happen to u. I never thought it wud to me but here I am. I have god to. He is above any human. But you are not human u are a money making machine for social security. How do u look in the mirror. People will know ur name. U need God. He knows ur heart and everything. And he knows u tried to crucify me. They did that to Jerusalem to. I never shudder have been denied if u had allowed my proofs and not left some out. You kept saying u had ur reasons. What the hell does that mean. And the idiots with u allowed u to get away with that. One day.
I am going to bring the truth bout you to light betty. I will go to the news or whoever will listen. U were not fair with me at all. There are people with less wrong with them than I have and got approved. I wish I cud be working cuz I hate our justice system. I'm against death penalty but that's another story. I can't complain to social security bout u betty cuz u in their pocket making 170,000 a year. Wow. I hope one day u get sick and need help. Don't think it can't happen to u. I never thought it wud to me but here I am. I have god to. He is above any human. But you are not human u are a money making machine for social security. How do u look in the mirror. People will know ur name. U need God. He knows ur heart and everything. And he knows u tried to crucify me. They did that to Jerusalem to. I never shudder have been denied if u had allowed my proofs and not left some out. You kept saying u had ur reasons. What the hell does that mean. And the idiots with u allowed u to get away with that. One day.
I am going to bring the truth bout you to light betty. I will go to the news or whoever will listen. U were not fair with me at all. There are people with less wrong with them than I have and got approved. I wish I cud be working cuz I hate our justice system. I'm against death penalty but that's another story. I can't complain to social security bout u betty cuz u in their pocket making 170,000 a year. Wow. I hope one day u get sick and need help. Don't think it can't happen to u. I never thought it wud to me but here I am. I have god to. He is above any human. But you are not human u are a money making machine for social security. How do u look in the mirror. People will know ur name. U need God. He knows ur heart and everything. And he knows u tried to crucify me. They did that to Jerusalem to. I never shudder have been denied if u had allowed my proofs and not left some out. You kept saying u had ur reasons. What the hell does that mean. And the idiots with u allowed u to get away with that. One day.
I hope she reads our comments if u can judge us at least be woman enough to hear those that judge u. Don't hide behind ur robe and the little people working for u. U judge us and don't know what we go through everyday. Yeah some people may be lieing. Majority are not like me. I hope ur little people allow us to read this. Don't forget somebody is judging u to. And he see what u do betty barbeito. When u go home u like everybody else. U live u die. U need to grow a heart and start caring bout people. Cuz u don't c what I go thru everyday.I know I may be wasting my time and ur little people are laughing or deleting my message, but know u people are being judged to. Only a coward wud not read their own emails
I hope she reads our comments if u can judge us at least be woman enough to hear those that judge u. Don't hide behind ur robe and the little people working for u. U judge us and don't know what we go through everyday. Yeah some people may be lieing. Majority are not like me. I hope ur little people allow us to read this. Don't forget somebody is judging u to. And he see what u do betty barbeito. When u go home u like everybody else. U live u die. U need to grow a heart and start caring bout people. Cuz u don't c what I go thru everyday.I know I may be wasting my time and ur little people are laughing or deleting my message, but know u people are being judged to. Only a coward wud not read their own emails
I hope she reads our comments if u can judge us at least be woman enough to hear those that judge u. Don't hide behind ur robe and the little people working for u. U judge us and don't know what we go through everyday. Yeah some people may be lieing. Majority are not like me. I hope ur little people allow us to read this. Don't forget somebody is judging u to. And he see what u do betty barbeito. When u go home u like everybody else. U live u die. U need to grow a heart and start caring bout people. Cuz u don't c what I go thru everyday.I know I may be wasting my time and ur little people are laughing or deleting my message, but know u people are being judged to. Only a coward wud not read their own emails
The single most incompetent judge in the 9th. An absolute joke and should have her position revoked along with her license.
The single most incompetent judge in the 9th. An absolute joke and should have her position revoked along with her license.
The single most incompetent judge in the 9th. An absolute joke and should have her position revoked along with her license.
I agree, Barbeito is horrid. I was set up for a teleconference hearing. The proctors could not get the equipment working properly, so there was a delay starting. Then she went to a doctor who is a board-certified pulmonologist, although my issues are fibromyalgia and extreme arthritis. Most of the hearing was given over to that quack, who made the most ludicrous comments I have ever heard from a so-called doctor. Then she went to the vocational expert who said his piece. Then there was a fire scare and everybody had to abandon the building. I was unable to ask any questions or argue any point. She asked me two questions: 1) what makes you think YOU are disabled, and 2) are you seeing a psychiatrist. I tried to explain that I was between psychs, as I get my care through the VA and the psych I have been seeing had left and no replacement had yet been hired. When I tried to explain that, she immediately cut me off saying, YES OR NO???? She did ultimately grant a PARTIAL approval, which gave me zero back pay and zero for the lawyers fee. But I had to take it because otherwise, I could have ended up with nothing. I have now been off work for 3.5 years, from a job, which, by the way, I LOVED and hated to retire from. My HR manager asked me to stay, and when I explained to him which I was going through, he TOLD me to leave and file for SSDI. To make it even worse, my last employer was the Department of Defense, another federal agency! I left in Dec of 2013 and have yet to receive a penny of SSDI, because, of course, the three years before my hearing date didn't count, so now I am waiting out my five month waiting period. This whole process was a cruel joke. So glad I worked for 45 years, frequently two jobs at time, paying all of my taxes to be treated like criminal by the likes of Barbeito.
I agree, Barbeito is horrid. I was set up for a teleconference hearing. The proctors could not get the equipment working properly, so there was a delay starting. Then she went to a doctor who is a board-certified pulmonologist, although my issues are fibromyalgia and extreme arthritis. Most of the hearing was given over to that quack, who made the most ludicrous comments I have ever heard from a so-called doctor. Then she went to the vocational expert who said his piece. Then there was a fire scare and everybody had to abandon the building. I was unable to ask any questions or argue any point. She asked me two questions: 1) what makes you think YOU are disabled, and 2) are you seeing a psychiatrist. I tried to explain that I was between psychs, as I get my care through the VA and the psych I have been seeing had left and no replacement had yet been hired. When I tried to explain that, she immediately cut me off saying, YES OR NO???? She did ultimately grant a PARTIAL approval, which gave me zero back pay and zero for the lawyers fee. But I had to take it because otherwise, I could have ended up with nothing. I have now been off work for 3.5 years, from a job, which, by the way, I LOVED and hated to retire from. My HR manager asked me to stay, and when I explained to him which I was going through, he TOLD me to leave and file for SSDI. To make it even worse, my last employer was the Department of Defense, another federal agency! I left in Dec of 2013 and have yet to receive a penny of SSDI, because, of course, the three years before my hearing date didn't count, so now I am waiting out my five month waiting period. This whole process was a cruel joke. So glad I worked for 45 years, frequently two jobs at time, paying all of my taxes to be treated like criminal by the likes of Barbeito.
I agree, Barbeito is horrid. I was set up for a teleconference hearing. The proctors could not get the equipment working properly, so there was a delay starting. Then she went to a doctor who is a board-certified pulmonologist, although my issues are fibromyalgia and extreme arthritis. Most of the hearing was given over to that quack, who made the most ludicrous comments I have ever heard from a so-called doctor. Then she went to the vocational expert who said his piece. Then there was a fire scare and everybody had to abandon the building. I was unable to ask any questions or argue any point. She asked me two questions: 1) what makes you think YOU are disabled, and 2) are you seeing a psychiatrist. I tried to explain that I was between psychs, as I get my care through the VA and the psych I have been seeing had left and no replacement had yet been hired. When I tried to explain that, she immediately cut me off saying, YES OR NO???? She did ultimately grant a PARTIAL approval, which gave me zero back pay and zero for the lawyers fee. But I had to take it because otherwise, I could have ended up with nothing. I have now been off work for 3.5 years, from a job, which, by the way, I LOVED and hated to retire from. My HR manager asked me to stay, and when I explained to him which I was going through, he TOLD me to leave and file for SSDI. To make it even worse, my last employer was the Department of Defense, another federal agency! I left in Dec of 2013 and have yet to receive a penny of SSDI, because, of course, the three years before my hearing date didn't count, so now I am waiting out my five month waiting period. This whole process was a cruel joke. So glad I worked for 45 years, frequently two jobs at time, paying all of my taxes to be treated like criminal by the likes of Barbeito.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I'm suffering from bipolar, depression, anxiety and agoraphobia. The call from the doctor was not correct for my other disability blephorspasm but I am hoping judge Barbeito can see my struggles.
I need to state who ever that doctor is that called I'm about my blephorspasm needs to get his facts straight of what the disease is he is misinformed I hope the other SSDI doctors are more intelligent After this doctor called I was schocked and became so stressed. This is what Blephorspasm: Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids.May 7, 2017 Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids. The exact cause of BEB is unknown and, by definition, it is not associated with another disease entity or syndrome. Symptoms usually begin as mild and infrequent spasms that progress over time to forceful and frequent contractures of the eyelids, in advanced cases causing functional blindness from inability to temporarily open the eyes. The treatment of choice for BEB is periodic injection of botulinum toxin into the orbicularis oculi muscle. BEB is a clinical diagnosis and must be distinguished from secondary blepharospasm, which can occur in association with a syndrome, movement disorder, or a specific ocular disease such as in reflex blepharospasm secondary to ocular irritation. History is very important in making the diagnosis, and it also allows the clinician to distinguish between primary (essential) and secondary blepharospasm. In BEB, excessive blinking, which may start as unilateral and mild twitches, progresses to bilateral frequent and more forceful spasms. During severe episodes a patient may report the inability to pry the eyelids open. Episodes may interfere with the patient’s daily activities, such as reading and driving. The spasms disappear during sleep and may be reduced when concentrating on a specific task. In secondary etiologies, the patient may offer a history of drug use as with tardive dyskinesia, of ocular irritation from light or dry eye as in reflex blepharospasm, of associated facial grimacing as in Meige syndrome, or a history of other abnormal movements such as tics or cogwheeling of the neck and extremities in extrapyramidal disease states. Thank
I need to state who ever that doctor is that called I'm about my blephorspasm needs to get his facts straight of what the disease is he is misinformed I hope the other SSDI doctors are more intelligent After this doctor called I was schocked and became so stressed. This is what Blephorspasm: Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids.May 7, 2017 Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids. The exact cause of BEB is unknown and, by definition, it is not associated with another disease entity or syndrome. Symptoms usually begin as mild and infrequent spasms that progress over time to forceful and frequent contractures of the eyelids, in advanced cases causing functional blindness from inability to temporarily open the eyes. The treatment of choice for BEB is periodic injection of botulinum toxin into the orbicularis oculi muscle. BEB is a clinical diagnosis and must be distinguished from secondary blepharospasm, which can occur in association with a syndrome, movement disorder, or a specific ocular disease such as in reflex blepharospasm secondary to ocular irritation. History is very important in making the diagnosis, and it also allows the clinician to distinguish between primary (essential) and secondary blepharospasm. In BEB, excessive blinking, which may start as unilateral and mild twitches, progresses to bilateral frequent and more forceful spasms. During severe episodes a patient may report the inability to pry the eyelids open. Episodes may interfere with the patient’s daily activities, such as reading and driving. The spasms disappear during sleep and may be reduced when concentrating on a specific task. In secondary etiologies, the patient may offer a history of drug use as with tardive dyskinesia, of ocular irritation from light or dry eye as in reflex blepharospasm, of associated facial grimacing as in Meige syndrome, or a history of other abnormal movements such as tics or cogwheeling of the neck and extremities in extrapyramidal disease states. Thank
I need to state who ever that doctor is that called I'm about my blephorspasm needs to get his facts straight of what the disease is he is misinformed I hope the other SSDI doctors are more intelligent After this doctor called I was schocked and became so stressed. This is what Blephorspasm: Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids.May 7, 2017 Blepharospasm is abnormal contraction of the eyelid muscles. It often refers to benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) which is a bilateral condition and a form of focal dystonia leading to episodic closure of the eyelids. The exact cause of BEB is unknown and, by definition, it is not associated with another disease entity or syndrome. Symptoms usually begin as mild and infrequent spasms that progress over time to forceful and frequent contractures of the eyelids, in advanced cases causing functional blindness from inability to temporarily open the eyes. The treatment of choice for BEB is periodic injection of botulinum toxin into the orbicularis oculi muscle. BEB is a clinical diagnosis and must be distinguished from secondary blepharospasm, which can occur in association with a syndrome, movement disorder, or a specific ocular disease such as in reflex blepharospasm secondary to ocular irritation. History is very important in making the diagnosis, and it also allows the clinician to distinguish between primary (essential) and secondary blepharospasm. In BEB, excessive blinking, which may start as unilateral and mild twitches, progresses to bilateral frequent and more forceful spasms. During severe episodes a patient may report the inability to pry the eyelids open. Episodes may interfere with the patient’s daily activities, such as reading and driving. The spasms disappear during sleep and may be reduced when concentrating on a specific task. In secondary etiologies, the patient may offer a history of drug use as with tardive dyskinesia, of ocular irritation from light or dry eye as in reflex blepharospasm, of associated facial grimacing as in Meige syndrome, or a history of other abnormal movements such as tics or cogwheeling of the neck and extremities in extrapyramidal disease states. Thank
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
Dear Judge Barbeito I hope you read this. You are reviewing my case. My symptoms are getting worse I have bipolar, depression and anxiety which cannot be denied in my record. I also receive Botox on my eyes by a neurologist now before it was a opthomoligist. The neurologist on the phone needs to know what Blephorspasm is before saying anything else my neurologist will say differently. I will reaply if denied due to my severe disabilities. Writhed by a friend due to vision issues. J.Fujimoto 7101 Cynthia Starkey.
She is a lier she make false statement and she thinks she all that she don't need to be on a NY type of judge are any other form if justice department .she is racist and she is on some power trip.she foes not take her title seriously and she is putting people who work in ststem a ND become I'll lively hood in a state of in justed .she needs to be Fired! U r going to find SSI department in a big civil rights c a see behind this cruel evil being !
She is a lier she make false statement and she thinks she all that she don't need to be on a NY type of judge are any other form if justice department .she is racist and she is on some power trip.she foes not take her title seriously and she is putting people who work in ststem a ND become I'll lively hood in a state of in justed .she needs to be Fired! U r going to find SSI department in a big civil rights c a see behind this cruel evil being !
She is a lier she make false statement and she thinks she all that she don't need to be on a NY type of judge are any other form if justice department .she is racist and she is on some power trip.she foes not take her title seriously and she is putting people who work in ststem a ND become I'll lively hood in a state of in justed .she needs to be Fired! U r going to find SSI department in a big civil rights c a see behind this cruel evil being !
Fair, happy with case
Fair, happy with case
Fair, happy with case
best.judge.ever!
best.judge.ever!
best.judge.ever!
You've got to be kidding me. I'd say perhaps the Judge has some secrets of his own which is why he thought 30 days was a fair and just sentence. I have no idea if he has secrets in his past or not, just my opinion. Either that, or the judge has serious mental disabilities and should resign for the benefit of the judicial system in his great state!
You've got to be kidding me. I'd say perhaps the Judge has some secrets of his own which is why he thought 30 days was a fair and just sentence. I have no idea if he has secrets in his past or not, just my opinion. Either that, or the judge has serious mental disabilities and should resign for the benefit of the judicial system in his great state!
You've got to be kidding me. I'd say perhaps the Judge has some secrets of his own which is why he thought 30 days was a fair and just sentence. I have no idea if he has secrets in his past or not, just my opinion. Either that, or the judge has serious mental disabilities and should resign for the benefit of the judicial system in his great state!
He is a very fair and very reasonable judge
He is a very fair and very reasonable judge
He is a very fair and very reasonable judge
I went before judge Baum back in 2011 and he granted me 100 percent disability with bk pay and than I was denied because my roommate started getting his Soc.security someone filled us a married couple so I was cut off and had to reapply again fo disability and was supposed to get bk 4years of bk pay when I was approved again and judge C.Davis only granted me 1 1/2 years bk pay when I was determined 100 0/0 bk in 2012 by judge Baum now I feel discriminated by judge Davis so I plan to appeal his dicission to get all my bk pay I deserve from 2012 to the present time no better judge than Peter Baum god bless him
I went before judge Baum back in 2011 and he granted me 100 percent disability with bk pay and than I was denied because my roommate started getting his Soc.security someone filled us a married couple so I was cut off and had to reapply again fo disability and was supposed to get bk 4years of bk pay when I was approved again and judge C.Davis only granted me 1 1/2 years bk pay when I was determined 100 0/0 bk in 2012 by judge Baum now I feel discriminated by judge Davis so I plan to appeal his dicission to get all my bk pay I deserve from 2012 to the present time no better judge than Peter Baum god bless him
I went before judge Baum back in 2011 and he granted me 100 percent disability with bk pay and than I was denied because my roommate started getting his Soc.security someone filled us a married couple so I was cut off and had to reapply again fo disability and was supposed to get bk 4years of bk pay when I was approved again and judge C.Davis only granted me 1 1/2 years bk pay when I was determined 100 0/0 bk in 2012 by judge Baum now I feel discriminated by judge Davis so I plan to appeal his dicission to get all my bk pay I deserve from 2012 to the present time no better judge than Peter Baum god bless him
He probably just saved my life. God bless.
He probably just saved my life. God bless.
He probably just saved my life. God bless.
Judge Baum. He is a very straight shooting judge and is very fair!
Judge Baum. He is a very straight shooting judge and is very fair!
Judge Baum. He is a very straight shooting judge and is very fair!
judge peter j.baum He gave my husband a waiver overpayment of $83,000 he is fair we will see what happens.
judge peter j.baum He gave my husband a waiver overpayment of $83,000 he is fair we will see what happens.
judge peter j.baum He gave my husband a waiver overpayment of $83,000 he is fair we will see what happens.
It felt like it took forever for my hearing date to come. I was nervous about my hearing after reading some of the other feedbacks on this site. Judge Biesman made me feel comfortable right away. He was very professional and at the same time he didn't make me feel like I was trying to get something I didn't deserve. I could tell he read all my paperwork and truly understood what I have been going through. I left there feeling really good about the Social Security system. I am sorry for anyone who has felt they were treated unfairly.
It felt like it took forever for my hearing date to come. I was nervous about my hearing after reading some of the other feedbacks on this site. Judge Biesman made me feel comfortable right away. He was very professional and at the same time he didn't make me feel like I was trying to get something I didn't deserve. I could tell he read all my paperwork and truly understood what I have been going through. I left there feeling really good about the Social Security system. I am sorry for anyone who has felt they were treated unfairly.
It felt like it took forever for my hearing date to come. I was nervous about my hearing after reading some of the other feedbacks on this site. Judge Biesman made me feel comfortable right away. He was very professional and at the same time he didn't make me feel like I was trying to get something I didn't deserve. I could tell he read all my paperwork and truly understood what I have been going through. I left there feeling really good about the Social Security system. I am sorry for anyone who has felt they were treated unfairly.
Too bad I had the EXACT OPPOSITE response from Judge Biesman.
Too bad I had the EXACT OPPOSITE response from Judge Biesman.
Too bad I had the EXACT OPPOSITE response from Judge Biesman.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Sherwin F Biesman, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Sherwin F Biesman, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Sherwin F Biesman, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
judge biesman made me feel uncomfotable as soon as i came into the courtroom. I know that I was treated unfairly. I hope that this doesn't happen to anyone else. If anyone has been treated unfairly by Juge Biesman I encourage you to write a letter to complain.
judge biesman made me feel uncomfotable as soon as i came into the courtroom. I know that I was treated unfairly. I hope that this doesn't happen to anyone else. If anyone has been treated unfairly by Juge Biesman I encourage you to write a letter to complain.
judge biesman made me feel uncomfotable as soon as i came into the courtroom. I know that I was treated unfairly. I hope that this doesn't happen to anyone else. If anyone has been treated unfairly by Juge Biesman I encourage you to write a letter to complain.
Sherwin F. Biesman, ALJ, is a very sick individual who must have been severely emotionally damaged in his infancy. I cannot believe he is still serving as an ALJ, with all the complaints attorneys filed against him when he was in Houston. If i could rate this monstrous ALJ zero stars, I would.
Sherwin F. Biesman, ALJ, is a very sick individual who must have been severely emotionally damaged in his infancy. I cannot believe he is still serving as an ALJ, with all the complaints attorneys filed against him when he was in Houston. If i could rate this monstrous ALJ zero stars, I would.
Sherwin F. Biesman, ALJ, is a very sick individual who must have been severely emotionally damaged in his infancy. I cannot believe he is still serving as an ALJ, with all the complaints attorneys filed against him when he was in Houston. If i could rate this monstrous ALJ zero stars, I would.
I have nerv root compression on mri an x ray doctor said...speclist say L4L5 need operating on but this judge called it stiffness only so we dont go by pain and nerv damage we going of a judge that thinks injured people on paper work is a joke....judge for your color and looks not docters words on paper,liers that take and outh,said on paper i denied theropy when on paper work i have been to physical theropy age shouldent matter when u injured but ,but,but...go by docters words not judge paper work. Time will tell on you judge...
I have nerv root compression on mri an x ray doctor said...speclist say L4L5 need operating on but this judge called it stiffness only so we dont go by pain and nerv damage we going of a judge that thinks injured people on paper work is a joke....judge for your color and looks not docters words on paper,liers that take and outh,said on paper i denied theropy when on paper work i have been to physical theropy age shouldent matter when u injured but ,but,but...go by docters words not judge paper work. Time will tell on you judge...
I have nerv root compression on mri an x ray doctor said...speclist say L4L5 need operating on but this judge called it stiffness only so we dont go by pain and nerv damage we going of a judge that thinks injured people on paper work is a joke....judge for your color and looks not docters words on paper,liers that take and outh,said on paper i denied theropy when on paper work i have been to physical theropy age shouldent matter when u injured but ,but,but...go by docters words not judge paper work. Time will tell on you judge...
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
Does he think he is GOD? My case should have been approved but was denied because of Richard Breen's judgment. I am living off my savings. Thank goodness I still have some. I worked for 24 years as a nurse. When I started my job at UCLA 30 years ago, I was given a Rubella vaccine because my Rubella titer was absent. I got the dreaded side effect of the Rubella vaccine which is DIABETES TYPE 1 -- the type children get. I was 22 years old -- not a child. I worked with this disease for 24 years. The disease is progressive. My kind of Diabetes is not as kind as other people's Diabetes. After all, my diabetes was contracted because of chemical poisoning -- the vaccine. I cannot work a regular job. Sometimes I cannot even get out of bed until very late in the evening. Judge Richard Breen had this doctor, Dr. Antoine Trammell from Atlanta, advise him on my case. Together, they are a destructive team. This doctor had no idea about the life I was living then. That was 2 years ago. I did try to fight his judgment. I spent $400 for my case to be reevaluated. Waste of money. Now, my life has gotten worse. I wonder when I should reapply for disability because, with my luck, I might be assigned Richard Breen again as the judge who hears my case. He is the judge who denies the most cases. See above stats. Is he given a bonus for destroying people's lives by not giving them their disability when they really deserve it? Because of Judges like him, people who have paid into the system, who have worked tirelessly to improve society, I can assume could REALLY become homeless. He sits on a bench. Nurses, at least the kind of nurse I was, do not sit. Our jobs help people live their lives. Maybe a long time ago, he helped people. Now, he is obviously just helping himself. He needs to be retired for the benefit of people everywhere. Allow him a good life in retirement land where he STOPS hurting others. Thank you.
As I was walking today, I saw homeless people on the sidewalk. I hope one day NOT to know how it is to be homeless. One day, I might know exactly how it is to be homeless. Does Judge Breen know what it is to be homeless? Does he care? Really, does he care about anybody else besides himself? Disability would have sincerely helped me in my housing situation. I worked 24 years as a professional nurse and paid into Social Security since I was 12 years old working odd jobs. I enjoyed working!!! I have found out that unless you know how to work the system, you lose. Judge Richard Breen, we, people suffering disabilities, are not playing a game here; we are just trying to live our lives. Well, I just don't get it. I have not worked for 6 years because working routinely for me would essentially be a suicide mission. You work to live. You do not work to die. I waited for 4 years to sit in his room. Dr. Trammell convinced the Judge I could work and that probably I was lying about my situation. With a smile on his face, Judge Breen told me, "Don't worry, the doctor does not make the decision regarding your disability; I do." Judge Richard Breen, you made the WRONG decision. Does anybody with a heart read these comments? If you were hurt by Judge Breen, I feel your pain. Life would be more just if Judge Richard Breen felt our pain. Maybe if he were a nice guy and had empathy for others, he would step down from being a judge and realize he is not GOD. Life is NOT fair, huh?
As I was walking today, I saw homeless people on the sidewalk. I hope one day NOT to know how it is to be homeless. One day, I might know exactly how it is to be homeless. Does Judge Breen know what it is to be homeless? Does he care? Really, does he care about anybody else besides himself? Disability would have sincerely helped me in my housing situation. I worked 24 years as a professional nurse and paid into Social Security since I was 12 years old working odd jobs. I enjoyed working!!! I have found out that unless you know how to work the system, you lose. Judge Richard Breen, we, people suffering disabilities, are not playing a game here; we are just trying to live our lives. Well, I just don't get it. I have not worked for 6 years because working routinely for me would essentially be a suicide mission. You work to live. You do not work to die. I waited for 4 years to sit in his room. Dr. Trammell convinced the Judge I could work and that probably I was lying about my situation. With a smile on his face, Judge Breen told me, "Don't worry, the doctor does not make the decision regarding your disability; I do." Judge Richard Breen, you made the WRONG decision. Does anybody with a heart read these comments? If you were hurt by Judge Breen, I feel your pain. Life would be more just if Judge Richard Breen felt our pain. Maybe if he were a nice guy and had empathy for others, he would step down from being a judge and realize he is not GOD. Life is NOT fair, huh?
As I was walking today, I saw homeless people on the sidewalk. I hope one day NOT to know how it is to be homeless. One day, I might know exactly how it is to be homeless. Does Judge Breen know what it is to be homeless? Does he care? Really, does he care about anybody else besides himself? Disability would have sincerely helped me in my housing situation. I worked 24 years as a professional nurse and paid into Social Security since I was 12 years old working odd jobs. I enjoyed working!!! I have found out that unless you know how to work the system, you lose. Judge Richard Breen, we, people suffering disabilities, are not playing a game here; we are just trying to live our lives. Well, I just don't get it. I have not worked for 6 years because working routinely for me would essentially be a suicide mission. You work to live. You do not work to die. I waited for 4 years to sit in his room. Dr. Trammell convinced the Judge I could work and that probably I was lying about my situation. With a smile on his face, Judge Breen told me, "Don't worry, the doctor does not make the decision regarding your disability; I do." Judge Richard Breen, you made the WRONG decision. Does anybody with a heart read these comments? If you were hurt by Judge Breen, I feel your pain. Life would be more just if Judge Richard Breen felt our pain. Maybe if he were a nice guy and had empathy for others, he would step down from being a judge and realize he is not GOD. Life is NOT fair, huh?
Last night, I realized something. I will not be homeless. With a week left in my apartment, I will stop taking my insulin. Situation solved. You see, Judge Richard Breen, your judgment WAS clearly wrong about me. You obviously do not care. You might have sent some people to the streets but you will not send me there. Have a good life knowing that you made the wrong judgment about someone like me who has taken care of so many people in her life. I have helped people. I am proud of myself. I do not understand why you are so powerful in this country and are able to hurt people. I just hope you do not have children who might one day emulate your lack of compassion to others. I hope if you ever need a nurse, you will have one like me taking care of you. My dad was lucky.
Last night, I realized something. I will not be homeless. With a week left in my apartment, I will stop taking my insulin. Situation solved. You see, Judge Richard Breen, your judgment WAS clearly wrong about me. You obviously do not care. You might have sent some people to the streets but you will not send me there. Have a good life knowing that you made the wrong judgment about someone like me who has taken care of so many people in her life. I have helped people. I am proud of myself. I do not understand why you are so powerful in this country and are able to hurt people. I just hope you do not have children who might one day emulate your lack of compassion to others. I hope if you ever need a nurse, you will have one like me taking care of you. My dad was lucky.
Last night, I realized something. I will not be homeless. With a week left in my apartment, I will stop taking my insulin. Situation solved. You see, Judge Richard Breen, your judgment WAS clearly wrong about me. You obviously do not care. You might have sent some people to the streets but you will not send me there. Have a good life knowing that you made the wrong judgment about someone like me who has taken care of so many people in her life. I have helped people. I am proud of myself. I do not understand why you are so powerful in this country and are able to hurt people. I just hope you do not have children who might one day emulate your lack of compassion to others. I hope if you ever need a nurse, you will have one like me taking care of you. My dad was lucky.
I just want to state that I just had a hearing with Judge Breen. Never, judge a person according to what others say and think. I was told that he was rude, that he would not allow me to speak and much more negative BS. I was so scared to attend my hearing it wasnt funny. And he was not anything I was told. He was polite to me and was very fair. Sharon as I read your comments and you are blaming the judge for the status of your living arrangements. Thats not what disability is about and the judges have to follow the rules and laws. I understand that you say you have worked hard and you deserve S.S. But I dont believe that the judges go to work thinking they are God and whos lifes they are going to ruin by not approving cases. I can only go by your comment but you say it yourself you worked for years with the disability you stated. and you sound more like your mad because you werent approved for rent reasons. Personally I too have worked many years as a caregiver and I would do anything to be able to lift others again. I feel your pain but you cant not belittle the judge and think that he is only out to hurt people. And I dont advise anyone to be scanless and lie to the system as you had a remark to. I wish you the best, and I will pray for your future and I will pray that you over come your health issues. Take Care Dawn
I just want to state that I just had a hearing with Judge Breen. Never, judge a person according to what others say and think. I was told that he was rude, that he would not allow me to speak and much more negative BS. I was so scared to attend my hearing it wasnt funny. And he was not anything I was told. He was polite to me and was very fair. Sharon as I read your comments and you are blaming the judge for the status of your living arrangements. Thats not what disability is about and the judges have to follow the rules and laws. I understand that you say you have worked hard and you deserve S.S. But I dont believe that the judges go to work thinking they are God and whos lifes they are going to ruin by not approving cases. I can only go by your comment but you say it yourself you worked for years with the disability you stated. and you sound more like your mad because you werent approved for rent reasons. Personally I too have worked many years as a caregiver and I would do anything to be able to lift others again. I feel your pain but you cant not belittle the judge and think that he is only out to hurt people. And I dont advise anyone to be scanless and lie to the system as you had a remark to. I wish you the best, and I will pray for your future and I will pray that you over come your health issues. Take Care Dawn
I just want to state that I just had a hearing with Judge Breen. Never, judge a person according to what others say and think. I was told that he was rude, that he would not allow me to speak and much more negative BS. I was so scared to attend my hearing it wasnt funny. And he was not anything I was told. He was polite to me and was very fair. Sharon as I read your comments and you are blaming the judge for the status of your living arrangements. Thats not what disability is about and the judges have to follow the rules and laws. I understand that you say you have worked hard and you deserve S.S. But I dont believe that the judges go to work thinking they are God and whos lifes they are going to ruin by not approving cases. I can only go by your comment but you say it yourself you worked for years with the disability you stated. and you sound more like your mad because you werent approved for rent reasons. Personally I too have worked many years as a caregiver and I would do anything to be able to lift others again. I feel your pain but you cant not belittle the judge and think that he is only out to hurt people. And I dont advise anyone to be scanless and lie to the system as you had a remark to. I wish you the best, and I will pray for your future and I will pray that you over come your health issues. Take Care Dawn
Dear Dawn, I wish Judge Breen renders you a positive verdict. He impressed me as a nice and understanding man when I saw him too. It was only after I saw his verdict did I get mad. I wrote letters which I personally brought in to the office for him to read. Two of the young ladies who read my letters were very sympathetic. Do you think Judge Breen read my letters? Who knows? When I called Dr. Antoine Trammell in Atlanta to talk with him about my situation, he WAS VERY rude to me and told me if I ever called him again, he will call the authorities on me. This doctor is employed by the Social Security Board to give his "expert Medical opinion." He was going to call the authorities on me? What did I do to him? Dawn, the system IS indeed flawed. If I could work, I would work. Believe me, working would be much easier than worrying about every penny I spend. My mother used to tell me, "Save, Save, Save." Thank goodness, I did. I have already cashed out two of my retirements and am working on my third one. I live like a pauper. When Judge Breen met me, I was not working. My father was EMOTIONALLY distraught after my mother died. What got me to stop working nine months after my mom died was a statement my father made. He started realizing how sick I was when and after I worked. My father and my sister noticed after my shifts, I would have to take "coma days" -- that is I would have to be in bed for two or three days to recover from the shift. I arranged my schedule so my coworkers did not know that I was indeed sicker than most of our patients. Back to my dad's comment. My brother died when he was 7. My father told me he did not want to bury another child. He was looking right at me. I took off work to help him deal with being alone. Unfortunately, being a companion to my dad did not come with a paycheck. I told this to Judge Breen. I also told him that if I had to hire someone like me to help my dad, I would fire myself time and time again. I waited four years to sit before Judge Breen for my hearing. I did have a lawyer with me. She met me that day of the hearing. She was in disbelief about the whole situation too. I was not lying about my disability. I do not lie. A year and a half later after Judge Breen denied me, my dad really got sick. He had surgery and the doctors sent him home on Hospice to die. I was once again "employed" without a paycheck. I was picking him up and putting him in and out of a wheelchair for 6 months. I did work 24/7 for 6 months. That was the longest nursing shift I have ever had. I never had back problems before; now, I do. Taking care of my dad was an honor, a privilege and a pleasure. Honestly, there were times when I didn't know who would die first -- him or me. Well, because you are reading this, you know I am still around. I am still living off my savings. I do know that if I did get another job(s), I probably would be fired time and time again because I would expect my employer to want a well, healthy person in his or her employ. I had to get a sight-saving operation on my eye before I left work. I could easily lose my sight. But ... Dr. Trammell says I just need a good pair of eye glasses to help me see. No, Dr. Trammell, lights out can happen anytime for me. Glasses will not repair my optic nerve. Blindness will be a definite life changer for me. Working for me would cause me to lose my sight sooner than later. Like I said before, life is not fair. Judges do not make the right calls sometimes. Judge Breen is NOT GOD. I do have to forgive Judge Richard Breen for making the wrong judgment for me. I hope for you, he will make the right decision. I will, one day, be correctly JUDGED. And ... when I am JUDGED by THE REAL JUDGE, I hope that Judge will be proud of me and reward me with DISABILITY!!! No more worries!!! Have a good day. Dawn, thanks for caring.
Dear Dawn, I wish Judge Breen renders you a positive verdict. He impressed me as a nice and understanding man when I saw him too. It was only after I saw his verdict did I get mad. I wrote letters which I personally brought in to the office for him to read. Two of the young ladies who read my letters were very sympathetic. Do you think Judge Breen read my letters? Who knows? When I called Dr. Antoine Trammell in Atlanta to talk with him about my situation, he WAS VERY rude to me and told me if I ever called him again, he will call the authorities on me. This doctor is employed by the Social Security Board to give his "expert Medical opinion." He was going to call the authorities on me? What did I do to him? Dawn, the system IS indeed flawed. If I could work, I would work. Believe me, working would be much easier than worrying about every penny I spend. My mother used to tell me, "Save, Save, Save." Thank goodness, I did. I have already cashed out two of my retirements and am working on my third one. I live like a pauper. When Judge Breen met me, I was not working. My father was EMOTIONALLY distraught after my mother died. What got me to stop working nine months after my mom died was a statement my father made. He started realizing how sick I was when and after I worked. My father and my sister noticed after my shifts, I would have to take "coma days" -- that is I would have to be in bed for two or three days to recover from the shift. I arranged my schedule so my coworkers did not know that I was indeed sicker than most of our patients. Back to my dad's comment. My brother died when he was 7. My father told me he did not want to bury another child. He was looking right at me. I took off work to help him deal with being alone. Unfortunately, being a companion to my dad did not come with a paycheck. I told this to Judge Breen. I also told him that if I had to hire someone like me to help my dad, I would fire myself time and time again. I waited four years to sit before Judge Breen for my hearing. I did have a lawyer with me. She met me that day of the hearing. She was in disbelief about the whole situation too. I was not lying about my disability. I do not lie. A year and a half later after Judge Breen denied me, my dad really got sick. He had surgery and the doctors sent him home on Hospice to die. I was once again "employed" without a paycheck. I was picking him up and putting him in and out of a wheelchair for 6 months. I did work 24/7 for 6 months. That was the longest nursing shift I have ever had. I never had back problems before; now, I do. Taking care of my dad was an honor, a privilege and a pleasure. Honestly, there were times when I didn't know who would die first -- him or me. Well, because you are reading this, you know I am still around. I am still living off my savings. I do know that if I did get another job(s), I probably would be fired time and time again because I would expect my employer to want a well, healthy person in his or her employ. I had to get a sight-saving operation on my eye before I left work. I could easily lose my sight. But ... Dr. Trammell says I just need a good pair of eye glasses to help me see. No, Dr. Trammell, lights out can happen anytime for me. Glasses will not repair my optic nerve. Blindness will be a definite life changer for me. Working for me would cause me to lose my sight sooner than later. Like I said before, life is not fair. Judges do not make the right calls sometimes. Judge Breen is NOT GOD. I do have to forgive Judge Richard Breen for making the wrong judgment for me. I hope for you, he will make the right decision. I will, one day, be correctly JUDGED. And ... when I am JUDGED by THE REAL JUDGE, I hope that Judge will be proud of me and reward me with DISABILITY!!! No more worries!!! Have a good day. Dawn, thanks for caring.
Dear Dawn, I wish Judge Breen renders you a positive verdict. He impressed me as a nice and understanding man when I saw him too. It was only after I saw his verdict did I get mad. I wrote letters which I personally brought in to the office for him to read. Two of the young ladies who read my letters were very sympathetic. Do you think Judge Breen read my letters? Who knows? When I called Dr. Antoine Trammell in Atlanta to talk with him about my situation, he WAS VERY rude to me and told me if I ever called him again, he will call the authorities on me. This doctor is employed by the Social Security Board to give his "expert Medical opinion." He was going to call the authorities on me? What did I do to him? Dawn, the system IS indeed flawed. If I could work, I would work. Believe me, working would be much easier than worrying about every penny I spend. My mother used to tell me, "Save, Save, Save." Thank goodness, I did. I have already cashed out two of my retirements and am working on my third one. I live like a pauper. When Judge Breen met me, I was not working. My father was EMOTIONALLY distraught after my mother died. What got me to stop working nine months after my mom died was a statement my father made. He started realizing how sick I was when and after I worked. My father and my sister noticed after my shifts, I would have to take "coma days" -- that is I would have to be in bed for two or three days to recover from the shift. I arranged my schedule so my coworkers did not know that I was indeed sicker than most of our patients. Back to my dad's comment. My brother died when he was 7. My father told me he did not want to bury another child. He was looking right at me. I took off work to help him deal with being alone. Unfortunately, being a companion to my dad did not come with a paycheck. I told this to Judge Breen. I also told him that if I had to hire someone like me to help my dad, I would fire myself time and time again. I waited four years to sit before Judge Breen for my hearing. I did have a lawyer with me. She met me that day of the hearing. She was in disbelief about the whole situation too. I was not lying about my disability. I do not lie. A year and a half later after Judge Breen denied me, my dad really got sick. He had surgery and the doctors sent him home on Hospice to die. I was once again "employed" without a paycheck. I was picking him up and putting him in and out of a wheelchair for 6 months. I did work 24/7 for 6 months. That was the longest nursing shift I have ever had. I never had back problems before; now, I do. Taking care of my dad was an honor, a privilege and a pleasure. Honestly, there were times when I didn't know who would die first -- him or me. Well, because you are reading this, you know I am still around. I am still living off my savings. I do know that if I did get another job(s), I probably would be fired time and time again because I would expect my employer to want a well, healthy person in his or her employ. I had to get a sight-saving operation on my eye before I left work. I could easily lose my sight. But ... Dr. Trammell says I just need a good pair of eye glasses to help me see. No, Dr. Trammell, lights out can happen anytime for me. Glasses will not repair my optic nerve. Blindness will be a definite life changer for me. Working for me would cause me to lose my sight sooner than later. Like I said before, life is not fair. Judges do not make the right calls sometimes. Judge Breen is NOT GOD. I do have to forgive Judge Richard Breen for making the wrong judgment for me. I hope for you, he will make the right decision. I will, one day, be correctly JUDGED. And ... when I am JUDGED by THE REAL JUDGE, I hope that Judge will be proud of me and reward me with DISABILITY!!! No more worries!!! Have a good day. Dawn, thanks for caring.
Optic nerve was not a correct reference. The eyes are tricky. I had a bleed one time which was very scary. I was parked in my car and all of a sudden it looked like there was a lot of mud thrown on the windshield. Luckily, I stayed calm. I closed one eye -- sheer darkness was what I saw. Then I closed the other eye. What happened was I had a bleed in my eye. Bleeds can happen. Scary. After a day, the darkness in that affected eye cleared up. You see, I know Judge Richard Breen is only human. With me, he did make a mistake. Maybe I appeared too well when he saw me. I don't know. I did and do deserve Disability. For 20 years, I really had no adverse side effects from the Diabetes. I was very lucky. It was in the 22nd year of my working that I realized my working with my form of Diabetes was killing me. After 24 years of working as a nurse, I quit my job FOR my dad. He really saved my life. I called him my hero. Funny, at the end of his life, he called me HIS hero. I have been told that receiving Disability is like playing a game. If you do not know the rules, you lose. As bizarre as this may sound, I was told that statement by one of the officers who worked in the Disability office. Judge Breen has no idea of my daily life. He doesn't realize that my disease is progressive -- meaning it gets worse with time. I am typing with painful and numb fingers, I already had a blood sugar reaction which required me to lie down. If I L I V E until I am 61, and I am eligible for my Social Security, that is if the age doesn't increase, I will take it. What I need to do is write a screenplay, act in the movie and become wealthy!!! Hey, it could happen. Live life. Do as many good deeds as you can. Compliment people every day to make people smile and don't sweat the small stuff. Thank you for your prayers. You have my prayers too.
Optic nerve was not a correct reference. The eyes are tricky. I had a bleed one time which was very scary. I was parked in my car and all of a sudden it looked like there was a lot of mud thrown on the windshield. Luckily, I stayed calm. I closed one eye -- sheer darkness was what I saw. Then I closed the other eye. What happened was I had a bleed in my eye. Bleeds can happen. Scary. After a day, the darkness in that affected eye cleared up. You see, I know Judge Richard Breen is only human. With me, he did make a mistake. Maybe I appeared too well when he saw me. I don't know. I did and do deserve Disability. For 20 years, I really had no adverse side effects from the Diabetes. I was very lucky. It was in the 22nd year of my working that I realized my working with my form of Diabetes was killing me. After 24 years of working as a nurse, I quit my job FOR my dad. He really saved my life. I called him my hero. Funny, at the end of his life, he called me HIS hero. I have been told that receiving Disability is like playing a game. If you do not know the rules, you lose. As bizarre as this may sound, I was told that statement by one of the officers who worked in the Disability office. Judge Breen has no idea of my daily life. He doesn't realize that my disease is progressive -- meaning it gets worse with time. I am typing with painful and numb fingers, I already had a blood sugar reaction which required me to lie down. If I L I V E until I am 61, and I am eligible for my Social Security, that is if the age doesn't increase, I will take it. What I need to do is write a screenplay, act in the movie and become wealthy!!! Hey, it could happen. Live life. Do as many good deeds as you can. Compliment people every day to make people smile and don't sweat the small stuff. Thank you for your prayers. You have my prayers too.
Optic nerve was not a correct reference. The eyes are tricky. I had a bleed one time which was very scary. I was parked in my car and all of a sudden it looked like there was a lot of mud thrown on the windshield. Luckily, I stayed calm. I closed one eye -- sheer darkness was what I saw. Then I closed the other eye. What happened was I had a bleed in my eye. Bleeds can happen. Scary. After a day, the darkness in that affected eye cleared up. You see, I know Judge Richard Breen is only human. With me, he did make a mistake. Maybe I appeared too well when he saw me. I don't know. I did and do deserve Disability. For 20 years, I really had no adverse side effects from the Diabetes. I was very lucky. It was in the 22nd year of my working that I realized my working with my form of Diabetes was killing me. After 24 years of working as a nurse, I quit my job FOR my dad. He really saved my life. I called him my hero. Funny, at the end of his life, he called me HIS hero. I have been told that receiving Disability is like playing a game. If you do not know the rules, you lose. As bizarre as this may sound, I was told that statement by one of the officers who worked in the Disability office. Judge Breen has no idea of my daily life. He doesn't realize that my disease is progressive -- meaning it gets worse with time. I am typing with painful and numb fingers, I already had a blood sugar reaction which required me to lie down. If I L I V E until I am 61, and I am eligible for my Social Security, that is if the age doesn't increase, I will take it. What I need to do is write a screenplay, act in the movie and become wealthy!!! Hey, it could happen. Live life. Do as many good deeds as you can. Compliment people every day to make people smile and don't sweat the small stuff. Thank you for your prayers. You have my prayers too.
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Please Help Me.Please
Please Help Me.Please
Please Help Me.Please
I was treatec unfairly.
I was treatec unfairly.
I was treatec unfairly.
TREAD WITH CAUTION IF YOU END UP IN COURT AND HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS *****...REALLY. I'm 60 years old and I've been diagnosed with Bi-Polar and PTSD by my psychiatrist. Guess what??? You've guessed it right!!!
TREAD WITH CAUTION IF YOU END UP IN COURT AND HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS *****...REALLY. I'm 60 years old and I've been diagnosed with Bi-Polar and PTSD by my psychiatrist. Guess what??? You've guessed it right!!!
TREAD WITH CAUTION IF YOU END UP IN COURT AND HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS *****...REALLY. I'm 60 years old and I've been diagnosed with Bi-Polar and PTSD by my psychiatrist. Guess what??? You've guessed it right!!!
DO YOU THINK I GIVE A **** IF THIS ******* JUDGE SEES MY COMMENTS??? THINK AGAIN!!!
DO YOU THINK I GIVE A **** IF THIS ******* JUDGE SEES MY COMMENTS??? THINK AGAIN!!!
DO YOU THINK I GIVE A **** IF THIS ******* JUDGE SEES MY COMMENTS??? THINK AGAIN!!!
i dont give a **** *** even if she see this comment of mine! now, I dont have my ssi, and i need money to get into some housing and get myself a home!
i dont give a **** *** even if she see this comment of mine! now, I dont have my ssi, and i need money to get into some housing and get myself a home!
i dont give a **** *** even if she see this comment of mine! now, I dont have my ssi, and i need money to get into some housing and get myself a home!
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
Like!! I blog quite often and I genuinely thank you for your information. The article has truly peaked my interest.
Like!! I blog quite often and I genuinely thank you for your information. The article has truly peaked my interest.
I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.
I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this web site is in fact pleasant.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this web site is in fact pleasant.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
Nice guy, although not sure how the hearing went for I've never been to one. My hearing lasted about two hours, but half of the hearing a vocational expert was talking and another 30 minutes or so I was out of the room while a doctor was giving their findings.. lawyer said the length of the hearing along with the doctors oath and the vocational expert findings we're all good signs for me... But Im still not sure what to believe. Judge said he may want to have another hearing (forget what it's called) where he'd call in more experts, but also said because I have over 19000 pages of history on me he may not want to because of all the extra time it would take mailing doctors back and forth etc... Not a clue what any of that means.. anyway, had hearing Feb 1st 18 and it's been about a month. Hoping it doesn't take another 2 months to get the results...
Nice guy, although not sure how the hearing went for I've never been to one. My hearing lasted about two hours, but half of the hearing a vocational expert was talking and another 30 minutes or so I was out of the room while a doctor was giving their findings.. lawyer said the length of the hearing along with the doctors oath and the vocational expert findings we're all good signs for me... But Im still not sure what to believe. Judge said he may want to have another hearing (forget what it's called) where he'd call in more experts, but also said because I have over 19000 pages of history on me he may not want to because of all the extra time it would take mailing doctors back and forth etc... Not a clue what any of that means.. anyway, had hearing Feb 1st 18 and it's been about a month. Hoping it doesn't take another 2 months to get the results...
Nice guy, although not sure how the hearing went for I've never been to one. My hearing lasted about two hours, but half of the hearing a vocational expert was talking and another 30 minutes or so I was out of the room while a doctor was giving their findings.. lawyer said the length of the hearing along with the doctors oath and the vocational expert findings we're all good signs for me... But Im still not sure what to believe. Judge said he may want to have another hearing (forget what it's called) where he'd call in more experts, but also said because I have over 19000 pages of history on me he may not want to because of all the extra time it would take mailing doctors back and forth etc... Not a clue what any of that means.. anyway, had hearing Feb 1st 18 and it's been about a month. Hoping it doesn't take another 2 months to get the results...
This Judge seems friendly enough and will deny anyway possible even to the extent of having doctors refute SSDI own doctors report
This Judge seems friendly enough and will deny anyway possible even to the extent of having doctors refute SSDI own doctors report
This Judge seems friendly enough and will deny anyway possible even to the extent of having doctors refute SSDI own doctors report
This ALJ seems to approve more back in his home state of GA. Had only an 18% approval his first year in CA and 25% second year and yet in his home state he is up to 45%. My thought is he finally learning the job or is he partial to applicants of SSDI in his home state? Did not seem to know the job
This ALJ seems to approve more back in his home state of GA. Had only an 18% approval his first year in CA and 25% second year and yet in his home state he is up to 45%. My thought is he finally learning the job or is he partial to applicants of SSDI in his home state? Did not seem to know the job
This ALJ seems to approve more back in his home state of GA. Had only an 18% approval his first year in CA and 25% second year and yet in his home state he is up to 45%. My thought is he finally learning the job or is he partial to applicants of SSDI in his home state? Did not seem to know the job
He had a very pleasant demeanor and as a result, I felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I am denied, I will not give up!
He had a very pleasant demeanor and as a result, I felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I am denied, I will not give up!
He had a very pleasant demeanor and as a result, I felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I am denied, I will not give up!
He was very rude and disrespectful towards myself, and my mother who was attending my hearing. He often stopped us from stating our case, saying he wasn't concerned with how my seizures affect family life; to us, that was key to our defense. He rudely told me that I have to continue to see a doctor even though I absolutely cannot afford to, and they haven't helped. His disrespect caused me to become stressed out, and have a small panic attack during the hearing, going into muscle spams in my right arm. I pointed this out, and he ignored it. He also refused to listen to the fact that I have been out of work for eight years, except two that lasted one month, and one that lasted two weeks. He then told me I can work a house cleaning job at gainful levels, I had to laugh out loud because I had just stated that I couldn't even keep my own home clean, how could I clean multiple homes each day every day? I spend most of my time in bed, unable to move, on a good day I require a cane to help keep me moving. He refused to really listen to anything we said, he was condescending, rude, disrespectful, and accusatory. I walked out of the hearing devastated and angered at him, and ended up in full seizure in my mom's car because of him. He denied me, calling me a lair ("over exaggerate"). This was my second full run through with Disability. Garwal also made the denial at the hearing on my first run through. I've been fighting since 2006, and reapplied in 2010. Still fighting for my life that discompassionate people like Garwal are trying to deny. If you have this judge, tell him to go away and send in another, I know will for my third attempt at Disability...
He was very rude and disrespectful towards myself, and my mother who was attending my hearing. He often stopped us from stating our case, saying he wasn't concerned with how my seizures affect family life; to us, that was key to our defense. He rudely told me that I have to continue to see a doctor even though I absolutely cannot afford to, and they haven't helped. His disrespect caused me to become stressed out, and have a small panic attack during the hearing, going into muscle spams in my right arm. I pointed this out, and he ignored it. He also refused to listen to the fact that I have been out of work for eight years, except two that lasted one month, and one that lasted two weeks. He then told me I can work a house cleaning job at gainful levels, I had to laugh out loud because I had just stated that I couldn't even keep my own home clean, how could I clean multiple homes each day every day? I spend most of my time in bed, unable to move, on a good day I require a cane to help keep me moving. He refused to really listen to anything we said, he was condescending, rude, disrespectful, and accusatory. I walked out of the hearing devastated and angered at him, and ended up in full seizure in my mom's car because of him. He denied me, calling me a lair ("over exaggerate"). This was my second full run through with Disability. Garwal also made the denial at the hearing on my first run through. I've been fighting since 2006, and reapplied in 2010. Still fighting for my life that discompassionate people like Garwal are trying to deny. If you have this judge, tell him to go away and send in another, I know will for my third attempt at Disability...
He was very rude and disrespectful towards myself, and my mother who was attending my hearing. He often stopped us from stating our case, saying he wasn't concerned with how my seizures affect family life; to us, that was key to our defense. He rudely told me that I have to continue to see a doctor even though I absolutely cannot afford to, and they haven't helped. His disrespect caused me to become stressed out, and have a small panic attack during the hearing, going into muscle spams in my right arm. I pointed this out, and he ignored it. He also refused to listen to the fact that I have been out of work for eight years, except two that lasted one month, and one that lasted two weeks. He then told me I can work a house cleaning job at gainful levels, I had to laugh out loud because I had just stated that I couldn't even keep my own home clean, how could I clean multiple homes each day every day? I spend most of my time in bed, unable to move, on a good day I require a cane to help keep me moving. He refused to really listen to anything we said, he was condescending, rude, disrespectful, and accusatory. I walked out of the hearing devastated and angered at him, and ended up in full seizure in my mom's car because of him. He denied me, calling me a lair ("over exaggerate"). This was my second full run through with Disability. Garwal also made the denial at the hearing on my first run through. I've been fighting since 2006, and reapplied in 2010. Still fighting for my life that discompassionate people like Garwal are trying to deny. If you have this judge, tell him to go away and send in another, I know will for my third attempt at Disability...
I agree with Sharon, I felt good in the Hearing, but I knew I didn't get it when my Attorney wanting me to provide more information about the jobs that I worked for in 2004, 2006 and back in the 1990's. I also felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I also was denied, stated that I wasn't severe enough. I was told by my attorney that I laid about what I did, on my jobs. I will not give up!
I agree with Sharon, I felt good in the Hearing, but I knew I didn't get it when my Attorney wanting me to provide more information about the jobs that I worked for in 2004, 2006 and back in the 1990's. I also felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I also was denied, stated that I wasn't severe enough. I was told by my attorney that I laid about what I did, on my jobs. I will not give up!
I agree with Sharon, I felt good in the Hearing, but I knew I didn't get it when my Attorney wanting me to provide more information about the jobs that I worked for in 2004, 2006 and back in the 1990's. I also felt at ease and relaxed which increased my confidence. I felt my hearing went well. If it turns out that I also was denied, stated that I wasn't severe enough. I was told by my attorney that I laid about what I did, on my jobs. I will not give up!
Couldn't select the actual judge that heard my husband's case in SB because he must either be new to the Santa Barbara office, or he just came in to help clear some cases out of the queue. I will post our experience on his page in Iowa, and on this SB page. I am writing the information that we were seeking when trying to get an understanding of what to expect. Disability: Heart infraction number of 20, pacemaker and defibrillator Final Decision in this case was: Fully Approved Overall timeline from initial filing to payment receipt: ~3.5 years For those that want to know what to expect from a timeline perspective in this office, here is how it worked for us. Judge Henry Koltys heard my husband's case. He had a poker face the whole time, seemed like he was going to be fair in his ruling. He wasn't warm and fuzzy, but straight to the point & thorough, which is what I would want from someone making decisions about tax payer dollars. He questioned my husband first, for 30-40 minutes, then he sent my husband out, and called me in and asked me some questions about our daily life and accommodations that are made for my husband's heart condition. - Filed for disability in mid to late 2012 with a disability effective date of January of 2012. - Appealed denials twice. - After final appeal was sent, and a request for a hearing was made, it took 12 months to get a court date - received hearing date approximately 6 weeks before the hearing - October 14, 2015: Hearing (approximately 1 hour total) - November 21, 2015: received the "fully approved" decision - December 19, 2015: Partial back-pay payment received Still waiting on the following: - Award Letter outlining benefits - remaining back-payment - back-payment for dependents of the disabled Please note: this rating is for Judge Henry Koltys and not for Judge Dale Garwal
Couldn't select the actual judge that heard my husband's case in SB because he must either be new to the Santa Barbara office, or he just came in to help clear some cases out of the queue. I will post our experience on his page in Iowa, and on this SB page. I am writing the information that we were seeking when trying to get an understanding of what to expect. Disability: Heart infraction number of 20, pacemaker and defibrillator Final Decision in this case was: Fully Approved Overall timeline from initial filing to payment receipt: ~3.5 years For those that want to know what to expect from a timeline perspective in this office, here is how it worked for us. Judge Henry Koltys heard my husband's case. He had a poker face the whole time, seemed like he was going to be fair in his ruling. He wasn't warm and fuzzy, but straight to the point & thorough, which is what I would want from someone making decisions about tax payer dollars. He questioned my husband first, for 30-40 minutes, then he sent my husband out, and called me in and asked me some questions about our daily life and accommodations that are made for my husband's heart condition. - Filed for disability in mid to late 2012 with a disability effective date of January of 2012. - Appealed denials twice. - After final appeal was sent, and a request for a hearing was made, it took 12 months to get a court date - received hearing date approximately 6 weeks before the hearing - October 14, 2015: Hearing (approximately 1 hour total) - November 21, 2015: received the "fully approved" decision - December 19, 2015: Partial back-pay payment received Still waiting on the following: - Award Letter outlining benefits - remaining back-payment - back-payment for dependents of the disabled Please note: this rating is for Judge Henry Koltys and not for Judge Dale Garwal
Couldn't select the actual judge that heard my husband's case in SB because he must either be new to the Santa Barbara office, or he just came in to help clear some cases out of the queue. I will post our experience on his page in Iowa, and on this SB page. I am writing the information that we were seeking when trying to get an understanding of what to expect. Disability: Heart infraction number of 20, pacemaker and defibrillator Final Decision in this case was: Fully Approved Overall timeline from initial filing to payment receipt: ~3.5 years For those that want to know what to expect from a timeline perspective in this office, here is how it worked for us. Judge Henry Koltys heard my husband's case. He had a poker face the whole time, seemed like he was going to be fair in his ruling. He wasn't warm and fuzzy, but straight to the point & thorough, which is what I would want from someone making decisions about tax payer dollars. He questioned my husband first, for 30-40 minutes, then he sent my husband out, and called me in and asked me some questions about our daily life and accommodations that are made for my husband's heart condition. - Filed for disability in mid to late 2012 with a disability effective date of January of 2012. - Appealed denials twice. - After final appeal was sent, and a request for a hearing was made, it took 12 months to get a court date - received hearing date approximately 6 weeks before the hearing - October 14, 2015: Hearing (approximately 1 hour total) - November 21, 2015: received the "fully approved" decision - December 19, 2015: Partial back-pay payment received Still waiting on the following: - Award Letter outlining benefits - remaining back-payment - back-payment for dependents of the disabled Please note: this rating is for Judge Henry Koltys and not for Judge Dale Garwal
Dear Dale A. Garwell, For years you have been denying my request, after getting numerous doctors responses stating that I was not at fault and I continue to remain in severe pain; you continue to ignore it. You have no idea how much pain you have put me through! What I want to know is WHY? I don't even know you, have visited the Ventura office and keep getting the cold shoulder. What makes you so cold & bitter? All I'm trying to do is relieve the extreme pain I have received from numerous accidents. The only thing I can come up with is you are an evil person and have no buisness working for social security. I live with pain. Just want to get relief. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Dear Dale A. Garwell, For years you have been denying my request, after getting numerous doctors responses stating that I was not at fault and I continue to remain in severe pain; you continue to ignore it. You have no idea how much pain you have put me through! What I want to know is WHY? I don't even know you, have visited the Ventura office and keep getting the cold shoulder. What makes you so cold & bitter? All I'm trying to do is relieve the extreme pain I have received from numerous accidents. The only thing I can come up with is you are an evil person and have no buisness working for social security. I live with pain. Just want to get relief. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Dear Dale A. Garwell, For years you have been denying my request, after getting numerous doctors responses stating that I was not at fault and I continue to remain in severe pain; you continue to ignore it. You have no idea how much pain you have put me through! What I want to know is WHY? I don't even know you, have visited the Ventura office and keep getting the cold shoulder. What makes you so cold & bitter? All I'm trying to do is relieve the extreme pain I have received from numerous accidents. The only thing I can come up with is you are an evil person and have no buisness working for social security. I live with pain. Just want to get relief. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Dear Mr. Garwell, I remain in constant pain, almost blind. I see no reason you totally ignored the letter my doctor wrote on September 22, 2014. My case is in need of attention. Please reconsider my case. I have done nothing wrong, just trying to survive. I have a doctor appointment for tomorrow @ 11 a.m. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Dear Mr. Garwell, I remain in constant pain, almost blind. I see no reason you totally ignored the letter my doctor wrote on September 22, 2014. My case is in need of attention. Please reconsider my case. I have done nothing wrong, just trying to survive. I have a doctor appointment for tomorrow @ 11 a.m. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Dear Mr. Garwell, I remain in constant pain, almost blind. I see no reason you totally ignored the letter my doctor wrote on September 22, 2014. My case is in need of attention. Please reconsider my case. I have done nothing wrong, just trying to survive. I have a doctor appointment for tomorrow @ 11 a.m. Sincerely, Randy Scott Weaver
Judge Giannikas spent a lot of time listening. I had to return after the first hearing for a supplemental hearing. He changed my onset date twice but ruled in my favor. After reading the negative comments about several of the judges in Valparaiso, I think I was fortunate to have my case reviewed by someone who was paying attention.
Judge Giannikas spent a lot of time listening. I had to return after the first hearing for a supplemental hearing. He changed my onset date twice but ruled in my favor. After reading the negative comments about several of the judges in Valparaiso, I think I was fortunate to have my case reviewed by someone who was paying attention.
Judge Giannikas spent a lot of time listening. I had to return after the first hearing for a supplemental hearing. He changed my onset date twice but ruled in my favor. After reading the negative comments about several of the judges in Valparaiso, I think I was fortunate to have my case reviewed by someone who was paying attention.
After waiting over 2 1/2 years from my initial SSDI case being filed and the wait for the ALJ hearing, I just received my Notice of Decision - Unfavorable from this "Judge" regarding my PTSD, fragments of shrapnel from a gun shot wound that I nearly died from, and IBS during my active duty time in the service. I'm currently receiving 100% Service Connected from VA Compensation & Pension disability benefit from these disabilities mentioned, but this "Judge" stated that "After careful consideration of all the evidence, the undersigned (Judge) concludes the claimant (Me) was not under a disability" according to their SSA definition. Give me a break "Judge," even a blind person can recognize when someone is disabled based on the overwhelming evidence that I've submitted. This "Judge" seems to made a decision on my case before it even started. His own Vocational Rehabilitation counselor told him at the hearing (which was recorded) that there was no substantial gain of employment for panic attacks from my anxiety disorder/PTSD. I believe the true reason why my case was denied was because this "Judge" didn't want to award me the $48,000 retro pay for making me wait 33 months, along with the additional $1,500 per month for SSDI. I'm a bit disappointed, but not mad at all because I'm still getting VA benefits and will reapply for SSDI very soon because I know I have a very strong case and just need the right person to get me that favorable approval. It just does not make any sense to me on why I was not approved, but another fellow veteran with the same exact disability is getting SSA and 100% SC C&P. Please get a very good Lawyer for ALJ hearings, especially when dealing with this "Judge."
After waiting over 2 1/2 years from my initial SSDI case being filed and the wait for the ALJ hearing, I just received my Notice of Decision - Unfavorable from this "Judge" regarding my PTSD, fragments of shrapnel from a gun shot wound that I nearly died from, and IBS during my active duty time in the service. I'm currently receiving 100% Service Connected from VA Compensation & Pension disability benefit from these disabilities mentioned, but this "Judge" stated that "After careful consideration of all the evidence, the undersigned (Judge) concludes the claimant (Me) was not under a disability" according to their SSA definition. Give me a break "Judge," even a blind person can recognize when someone is disabled based on the overwhelming evidence that I've submitted. This "Judge" seems to made a decision on my case before it even started. His own Vocational Rehabilitation counselor told him at the hearing (which was recorded) that there was no substantial gain of employment for panic attacks from my anxiety disorder/PTSD. I believe the true reason why my case was denied was because this "Judge" didn't want to award me the $48,000 retro pay for making me wait 33 months, along with the additional $1,500 per month for SSDI. I'm a bit disappointed, but not mad at all because I'm still getting VA benefits and will reapply for SSDI very soon because I know I have a very strong case and just need the right person to get me that favorable approval. It just does not make any sense to me on why I was not approved, but another fellow veteran with the same exact disability is getting SSA and 100% SC C&P. Please get a very good Lawyer for ALJ hearings, especially when dealing with this "Judge."
After waiting over 2 1/2 years from my initial SSDI case being filed and the wait for the ALJ hearing, I just received my Notice of Decision - Unfavorable from this "Judge" regarding my PTSD, fragments of shrapnel from a gun shot wound that I nearly died from, and IBS during my active duty time in the service. I'm currently receiving 100% Service Connected from VA Compensation & Pension disability benefit from these disabilities mentioned, but this "Judge" stated that "After careful consideration of all the evidence, the undersigned (Judge) concludes the claimant (Me) was not under a disability" according to their SSA definition. Give me a break "Judge," even a blind person can recognize when someone is disabled based on the overwhelming evidence that I've submitted. This "Judge" seems to made a decision on my case before it even started. His own Vocational Rehabilitation counselor told him at the hearing (which was recorded) that there was no substantial gain of employment for panic attacks from my anxiety disorder/PTSD. I believe the true reason why my case was denied was because this "Judge" didn't want to award me the $48,000 retro pay for making me wait 33 months, along with the additional $1,500 per month for SSDI. I'm a bit disappointed, but not mad at all because I'm still getting VA benefits and will reapply for SSDI very soon because I know I have a very strong case and just need the right person to get me that favorable approval. It just does not make any sense to me on why I was not approved, but another fellow veteran with the same exact disability is getting SSA and 100% SC C&P. Please get a very good Lawyer for ALJ hearings, especially when dealing with this "Judge."
I attended a hearing at the ODAR with my daughter, who has PTSD and specific phobias. My daughter was assaulted at school and we were treated very abusively by our local school district. They were relentless in engaging in an attack on my daughters and myself, because they lost the litigation that they filed against my family. Yes, school districts litigate against families. This judge does not know that. He knows nothing about the Office of Administrative Hearings Special Education division, due process, or educational assessments. He told me that schools don't sue parents. I have two binders of transcripts that prove otherwise. He also was belligérant to me and my daughter. She had an anxiety attack at the hearing and he told her to stop crying. Thanks to him, she is re-traumatized. The judge also has no understanding that some disabities has a genetic connection, so it is entirely possible that three people in the same family can have related disabilities at the same judge. The inmput of the Vocational Rehab Specialist was also completely ignored. I guess this judge had to seem tough so he took it out on the minority family, because you know that we are all schemers according to the make America great again folks. Lose the quotas and make real decisions. This judge was rude, abrasive, overtalked me, my daughter, and her attorney. He had a made up mind before he heard one word of testimony. Judges should be knowledgeable regarding all aspects of disability rights, including the IDEA. This judge is not.
I attended a hearing at the ODAR with my daughter, who has PTSD and specific phobias. My daughter was assaulted at school and we were treated very abusively by our local school district. They were relentless in engaging in an attack on my daughters and myself, because they lost the litigation that they filed against my family. Yes, school districts litigate against families. This judge does not know that. He knows nothing about the Office of Administrative Hearings Special Education division, due process, or educational assessments. He told me that schools don't sue parents. I have two binders of transcripts that prove otherwise. He also was belligérant to me and my daughter. She had an anxiety attack at the hearing and he told her to stop crying. Thanks to him, she is re-traumatized. The judge also has no understanding that some disabities has a genetic connection, so it is entirely possible that three people in the same family can have related disabilities at the same judge. The inmput of the Vocational Rehab Specialist was also completely ignored. I guess this judge had to seem tough so he took it out on the minority family, because you know that we are all schemers according to the make America great again folks. Lose the quotas and make real decisions. This judge was rude, abrasive, overtalked me, my daughter, and her attorney. He had a made up mind before he heard one word of testimony. Judges should be knowledgeable regarding all aspects of disability rights, including the IDEA. This judge is not.
I attended a hearing at the ODAR with my daughter, who has PTSD and specific phobias. My daughter was assaulted at school and we were treated very abusively by our local school district. They were relentless in engaging in an attack on my daughters and myself, because they lost the litigation that they filed against my family. Yes, school districts litigate against families. This judge does not know that. He knows nothing about the Office of Administrative Hearings Special Education division, due process, or educational assessments. He told me that schools don't sue parents. I have two binders of transcripts that prove otherwise. He also was belligérant to me and my daughter. She had an anxiety attack at the hearing and he told her to stop crying. Thanks to him, she is re-traumatized. The judge also has no understanding that some disabities has a genetic connection, so it is entirely possible that three people in the same family can have related disabilities at the same judge. The inmput of the Vocational Rehab Specialist was also completely ignored. I guess this judge had to seem tough so he took it out on the minority family, because you know that we are all schemers according to the make America great again folks. Lose the quotas and make real decisions. This judge was rude, abrasive, overtalked me, my daughter, and her attorney. He had a made up mind before he heard one word of testimony. Judges should be knowledgeable regarding all aspects of disability rights, including the IDEA. This judge is not.
I just hope and pray that this guy die soon rather than later
I just hope and pray that this guy die soon rather than later
I just hope and pray that this guy die soon rather than later
This judge did not allow me to speak at my hearing. He prioritized the medical examiner's evaluation over my own doctor's and made inappropriate conjectures about my mental RFC. Ruled against me for no damn good reason and was in error in his decision after the vocation expert told him I was disabled permanently from my former occupation and 60% below for nearly everything else.
This judge did not allow me to speak at my hearing. He prioritized the medical examiner's evaluation over my own doctor's and made inappropriate conjectures about my mental RFC. Ruled against me for no damn good reason and was in error in his decision after the vocation expert told him I was disabled permanently from my former occupation and 60% below for nearly everything else.
This judge did not allow me to speak at my hearing. He prioritized the medical examiner's evaluation over my own doctor's and made inappropriate conjectures about my mental RFC. Ruled against me for no damn good reason and was in error in his decision after the vocation expert told him I was disabled permanently from my former occupation and 60% below for nearly everything else.
This judge was rude and disrespectful to me. He humiliated me in court and no one did anything. He even threw a temper tantrum and stomped out when he didn’t like what the doctor on the phone told him. He was insulting and condescending. He asked me if my last pregnancy was an accident. I’m not sure how he sleeps at night. And of course, like many others, even with plenty of proof in front of him, he denied my claim.
This judge was rude and disrespectful to me. He humiliated me in court and no one did anything. He even threw a temper tantrum and stomped out when he didn’t like what the doctor on the phone told him. He was insulting and condescending. He asked me if my last pregnancy was an accident. I’m not sure how he sleeps at night. And of course, like many others, even with plenty of proof in front of him, he denied my claim.
This judge was rude and disrespectful to me. He humiliated me in court and no one did anything. He even threw a temper tantrum and stomped out when he didn’t like what the doctor on the phone told him. He was insulting and condescending. He asked me if my last pregnancy was an accident. I’m not sure how he sleeps at night. And of course, like many others, even with plenty of proof in front of him, he denied my claim.
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
judge gunn was very rude. she didn't allow me to speak, other than to answer her questions. she attacked my character in my dismissal letter. she was untimely in her decision, because of all things, she went on a long medical leave. she returned and ordered a new hearing 8 months after my first hearing with her, only to cancel that hearing one day before it was to take place.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
The Judge was fair and very knowledgeable. I was sorely prepared as a cross examiner, I am not a lawyer. Look, this Judge is following the rules and considering the testimony of the doctors. These cases all ride on your medical information. The treating physician holds all the cards and must spell out your restrictions in a written form. None of the personal suffering matters, it's the content within the four corners of the medical records that count. When it's time to testify you are discussing the documents, not your personal downfall. Get your case files and read every page, somewhere buried in those documents is the reason why your case is failing to meet the rules. Speaking of the rules, since I know you can surf the internet read the Blue Book and check to see if you actually have an ailment listed spelled out in your medical history. Remember it is the medical content being discussed. Back to Judge Gunn, she has a powerful persona and is very much in control of the room. I got the feeling she knew one of the Doctors testifying had not read the complete record, and she shut them down quickly. I got every chance to ask questions along the way, but as I stated if it is not in the record, it doesn't count and is not discussed. Judge Gunn started talking about the grid, codes, this, that and the other. To tell you the truth, there is something wonderful about an intelligent woman that knows her stuff. I was totally distracted by the professionalism she displayed, her courtroom manner was pleasant and not bad to look at either, but I digress. At the end of my hearing my symptoms kicked in, I was thinking maybe I should have gotten a lawyer to do this hearing, when I heard the Judge mention details of the case which indicated she knew what was up. Be prepared and she will help you if you have the records. Contrary to what I heard about this will be the time you can tell your story to the Judge, it is not a story from your mouth but from your paperwork and records.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
She is a tuff judge! She has postpone my case twice. She repremanded my attorney in the second hearing for not having all my medical records. She told them on the record that they were a disservice to me in doing so. So, hearing number three? Postponed and assignd toa new judge. Now I have to see a new judge. I have a lot of respect for her but am quite annoyed with all the postponements because of the hardship it has created. She is no nonsense and is all about the records. So prepare.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
If you have a case, you will win. If not, prepare better.
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know [email protected]!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know [email protected]!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
Robert A Iger Corporate 818-460-7477 AMBIR SNIEZKODigital Entertainment 818-460-7045 CARAGH FISHERNews 212-456-3437 I’d have stroke and tell, talk and telephone know [email protected]!! ABC, CBS, NBC, Norman Lear the MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud) SUE C – 202829 Eric Monte settlement to Robert A Iger!! Judge of the Superior Court ROBERT I. WEIL! SUE C – 202829 California Attorney General’s Office I’d Eric Monte settlement for Ten Million Dollars (TAX) MICHAEL EISNER (Fraud), Ten Million Dollars (TAX) ABC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) CBS, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) NBC, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Norman Lear, Ten Million Dollars (TAX) Marsey-Werner Company!! Advertise Free ABC, Advertise Free NBC, Advertise Free CBS BUYING TV TIME TO RUN YOUR SEVEN DAYS NEW COMMERCIAL Ads 60 sec Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,”:60 sec SD Books "A Prophet Ranaway," and “Blueprint for Peace,” HD :60 sec ads - 5yr Bud Yorkin and “Sandford and Son” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte, Norman Lear “Good Times,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Norman Lear “Jefferson,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bud Yorkin “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Bernie Orenstein “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Saul Turteltaub “What’s Happening,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Marcy Carsey “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “The Cosby Show,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Tom Werner “Roseanne,” 20% Gross Residuals Eric Monte Eric Monte 16161 Ventura Blvd. Apt. #782 Encino, CA 91436
fair in the hearing, impossible to please with proof, views disability standards as impossible to reach= unfavorable decision. wth!
fair in the hearing, impossible to please with proof, views disability standards as impossible to reach= unfavorable decision. wth!
fair in the hearing, impossible to please with proof, views disability standards as impossible to reach= unfavorable decision. wth!
Unfair Judge.
Unfair Judge.
Unfair Judge.
****** ******* ****. She should be removed
****** ******* ****. She should be removed
****** ******* ****. She should be removed
My time in front of Robert Iafe was brief,thought i had a case that was speaking for itself,so to speak..dont think he was fair in his discision, and i had my case sent to appeals and now ODAR has my case back, really hope to get all my information in this time..as i as trying to do this on my own, since i cant get anyone to help me becuz i didnt "work within a 5 yr period to have a regular ssi case, im told its for supplemental disability benefits...anyway, i contacted the ODAR office today and left a msg for them to call me asap, as i need them to get some more records since i have been in and out of the hospitals all yr..Please God let them see how miserable I am on a daily basis...and get this case approved..AMEN
My time in front of Robert Iafe was brief,thought i had a case that was speaking for itself,so to speak..dont think he was fair in his discision, and i had my case sent to appeals and now ODAR has my case back, really hope to get all my information in this time..as i as trying to do this on my own, since i cant get anyone to help me becuz i didnt "work within a 5 yr period to have a regular ssi case, im told its for supplemental disability benefits...anyway, i contacted the ODAR office today and left a msg for them to call me asap, as i need them to get some more records since i have been in and out of the hospitals all yr..Please God let them see how miserable I am on a daily basis...and get this case approved..AMEN
My time in front of Robert Iafe was brief,thought i had a case that was speaking for itself,so to speak..dont think he was fair in his discision, and i had my case sent to appeals and now ODAR has my case back, really hope to get all my information in this time..as i as trying to do this on my own, since i cant get anyone to help me becuz i didnt "work within a 5 yr period to have a regular ssi case, im told its for supplemental disability benefits...anyway, i contacted the ODAR office today and left a msg for them to call me asap, as i need them to get some more records since i have been in and out of the hospitals all yr..Please God let them see how miserable I am on a daily basis...and get this case approved..AMEN
I realize that if a judge rules against you, then you will tend to not want to say positive things about him or her. Well I did lose my social security case but this goes deeper. In the addendum part of his decision where his subjective comments are stated, he was insulting to me and formed an unfounded opinion that is now on record. I believe this is very unprofessional and he should be reprimanded for losing his objectivity. The burden on the disabled is huge and sometimes not handled very well because of the disability. The judge has to look at medical records and talk to job specialists and it is equally hard to make a decision. I believe however that this judge based his opinion on personal bias against me and he stated some things in his finding that I will be complaint about. I can accepts not getting disability but to say that I am trying to pad my pockets and to question my truthfulness with insulting adjectives is not acceptable.
I realize that if a judge rules against you, then you will tend to not want to say positive things about him or her. Well I did lose my social security case but this goes deeper. In the addendum part of his decision where his subjective comments are stated, he was insulting to me and formed an unfounded opinion that is now on record. I believe this is very unprofessional and he should be reprimanded for losing his objectivity. The burden on the disabled is huge and sometimes not handled very well because of the disability. The judge has to look at medical records and talk to job specialists and it is equally hard to make a decision. I believe however that this judge based his opinion on personal bias against me and he stated some things in his finding that I will be complaint about. I can accepts not getting disability but to say that I am trying to pad my pockets and to question my truthfulness with insulting adjectives is not acceptable.
I realize that if a judge rules against you, then you will tend to not want to say positive things about him or her. Well I did lose my social security case but this goes deeper. In the addendum part of his decision where his subjective comments are stated, he was insulting to me and formed an unfounded opinion that is now on record. I believe this is very unprofessional and he should be reprimanded for losing his objectivity. The burden on the disabled is huge and sometimes not handled very well because of the disability. The judge has to look at medical records and talk to job specialists and it is equally hard to make a decision. I believe however that this judge based his opinion on personal bias against me and he stated some things in his finding that I will be complaint about. I can accepts not getting disability but to say that I am trying to pad my pockets and to question my truthfulness with insulting adjectives is not acceptable.
Lazy and incompetent. I have practiced law for over 20 years. Judge Lang reads file immediately before hearings and writes decisions after all while people wait hours. It is evident he is wholly unprepared. His conduct toward claimants is repugnant. His understanding of law is embarrassing to lawyers and would not be tolerated by any other judicial system. Judge lang is simple minded, doesn't know what he is doing and covers it up by being aggressive to meek people. He is just as likely to approve someone with mild limitations as he is deny someone easily disabled. What a joke
Lazy and incompetent. I have practiced law for over 20 years. Judge Lang reads file immediately before hearings and writes decisions after all while people wait hours. It is evident he is wholly unprepared. His conduct toward claimants is repugnant. His understanding of law is embarrassing to lawyers and would not be tolerated by any other judicial system. Judge lang is simple minded, doesn't know what he is doing and covers it up by being aggressive to meek people. He is just as likely to approve someone with mild limitations as he is deny someone easily disabled. What a joke
Lazy and incompetent. I have practiced law for over 20 years. Judge Lang reads file immediately before hearings and writes decisions after all while people wait hours. It is evident he is wholly unprepared. His conduct toward claimants is repugnant. His understanding of law is embarrassing to lawyers and would not be tolerated by any other judicial system. Judge lang is simple minded, doesn't know what he is doing and covers it up by being aggressive to meek people. He is just as likely to approve someone with mild limitations as he is deny someone easily disabled. What a joke
I agree with the above two comments with regards to this judge.
I agree with the above two comments with regards to this judge.
I agree with the above two comments with regards to this judge.
Hi, I am devastated by this whole experience. The two above statements are 100% correct. They explain exactly what I experienced in front of this "judge". Abusive, rude, hostile, incompetent, dis-respectful, and determining facts of my case that are insane basically / i.e.: completely ignoring what substantiates my symptoms & claims in the medical records. As well as determining an amount that is 30% less that what I should get. i was not allowed to be heard in my own hearing & repeatedly told to shut up basically. I was berated & shocked that I had to go through this. I was ill for 2 weeks following my first time before him. The attorneys I feel I was forced to get, did nothing to challenge this judges' ruling etc. Apparently they go before him a lot & I guess have a relationship with him that does not seem to help the claimant / client. I wish I and seen this site & read these reviews before going in front of him again.
Hi, I am devastated by this whole experience. The two above statements are 100% correct. They explain exactly what I experienced in front of this "judge". Abusive, rude, hostile, incompetent, dis-respectful, and determining facts of my case that are insane basically / i.e.: completely ignoring what substantiates my symptoms & claims in the medical records. As well as determining an amount that is 30% less that what I should get. i was not allowed to be heard in my own hearing & repeatedly told to shut up basically. I was berated & shocked that I had to go through this. I was ill for 2 weeks following my first time before him. The attorneys I feel I was forced to get, did nothing to challenge this judges' ruling etc. Apparently they go before him a lot & I guess have a relationship with him that does not seem to help the claimant / client. I wish I and seen this site & read these reviews before going in front of him again.
Hi, I am devastated by this whole experience. The two above statements are 100% correct. They explain exactly what I experienced in front of this "judge". Abusive, rude, hostile, incompetent, dis-respectful, and determining facts of my case that are insane basically / i.e.: completely ignoring what substantiates my symptoms & claims in the medical records. As well as determining an amount that is 30% less that what I should get. i was not allowed to be heard in my own hearing & repeatedly told to shut up basically. I was berated & shocked that I had to go through this. I was ill for 2 weeks following my first time before him. The attorneys I feel I was forced to get, did nothing to challenge this judges' ruling etc. Apparently they go before him a lot & I guess have a relationship with him that does not seem to help the claimant / client. I wish I and seen this site & read these reviews before going in front of him again.
I found Judge Lang to be a compassionate jurist. He gave my case his full attention and pointed out some problems with my presentation. A good human being. My case was heard in 2015.
I found Judge Lang to be a compassionate jurist. He gave my case his full attention and pointed out some problems with my presentation. A good human being. My case was heard in 2015.
I found Judge Lang to be a compassionate jurist. He gave my case his full attention and pointed out some problems with my presentation. A good human being. My case was heard in 2015.
Not real looking at all the case with open mind and the hardships this judge Lishner has done to people lives when she OBJECTION and you have to start all over again. But and when the court of appeals council speaks they say the judge was in error. What comes around goes around.
Not real looking at all the case with open mind and the hardships this judge Lishner has done to people lives when she OBJECTION and you have to start all over again. But and when the court of appeals council speaks they say the judge was in error. What comes around goes around.
Not real looking at all the case with open mind and the hardships this judge Lishner has done to people lives when she OBJECTION and you have to start all over again. But and when the court of appeals council speaks they say the judge was in error. What comes around goes around.
Judge Lishner made my case a very pleasant experience. I was very worried and nervous as I felt my life was on the line, I had no way to earn money to survive. I was born with a rare disease known as leg perthes. After a hip replacement in 2010 I tried my best to continue working for 2 years but had to file for Disability in 2013. My first claim was denied by people that really didn't take the time to examine what was wrong with me. When I received my decision letter after the trial, it brought tears to my eyes. She really took the time to examine my situation. On 3/24/2015 I had my second hip replacement surgery and I'm on the very long path of recovery. More surgery is necessary in the future. My mind is at ease because financial help is on the way. God bless you Honorable Elizabeth Lishner.
Judge Lishner made my case a very pleasant experience. I was very worried and nervous as I felt my life was on the line, I had no way to earn money to survive. I was born with a rare disease known as leg perthes. After a hip replacement in 2010 I tried my best to continue working for 2 years but had to file for Disability in 2013. My first claim was denied by people that really didn't take the time to examine what was wrong with me. When I received my decision letter after the trial, it brought tears to my eyes. She really took the time to examine my situation. On 3/24/2015 I had my second hip replacement surgery and I'm on the very long path of recovery. More surgery is necessary in the future. My mind is at ease because financial help is on the way. God bless you Honorable Elizabeth Lishner.
Judge Lishner made my case a very pleasant experience. I was very worried and nervous as I felt my life was on the line, I had no way to earn money to survive. I was born with a rare disease known as leg perthes. After a hip replacement in 2010 I tried my best to continue working for 2 years but had to file for Disability in 2013. My first claim was denied by people that really didn't take the time to examine what was wrong with me. When I received my decision letter after the trial, it brought tears to my eyes. She really took the time to examine my situation. On 3/24/2015 I had my second hip replacement surgery and I'm on the very long path of recovery. More surgery is necessary in the future. My mind is at ease because financial help is on the way. God bless you Honorable Elizabeth Lishner.
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Not all proof was given and looked at by this judge and the ssdi departments and because., be fair open and understanding not everyone is flaking their illness and their hands are tied and the real party that hurt this person dont want to accept and or let the person have the major surgreys they need and unable to work not bye choice just unable to because of their injury and now the Appeal Council overturn your first opinions and said look it over again,
Like!! Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
Like!! Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.
I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this web site is in fact pleasant.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this web site is in fact pleasant.
I used to be able to find good info from your blog posts.
I used to be able to find good info from your blog posts.
My name is Ryan Steven Mentier I live in Holly Michigan I have been waiting for a Decision on my case I have been living in a tent for a few months now and have been waiting on a yes or no on my disability case for 7 months now.I try to call and I get no answer my layer can't get threw eather
My name is Ryan Steven Mentier I live in Holly Michigan I have been waiting for a Decision on my case I have been living in a tent for a few months now and have been waiting on a yes or no on my disability case for 7 months now.I try to call and I get no answer my layer can't get threw eather
My name is Ryan Steven Mentier I live in Holly Michigan I have been waiting for a Decision on my case I have been living in a tent for a few months now and have been waiting on a yes or no on my disability case for 7 months now.I try to call and I get no answer my layer can't get threw eather
Judge, I am writing for a friend in Florida. Can you tell me why it has already been five months and this poor girl has no decision? I watched EMT's bring her back to life after a life threatening seizure. She can not be left unattended as she falls due to neuro issues and is becoming so depressed and withdrawn I dont even know if she will ever get back to herself again. I read the note above with the man living in a tent. Thats where she is headed. Is this seriously ethical? Your assistant told a US Congressman that a decision was made and would be mailed out last week and when her lawyer called to verify, she stated a decision was not made. This is uncalled for. What are the work hours being spent on??????
Judge, I am writing for a friend in Florida. Can you tell me why it has already been five months and this poor girl has no decision? I watched EMT's bring her back to life after a life threatening seizure. She can not be left unattended as she falls due to neuro issues and is becoming so depressed and withdrawn I dont even know if she will ever get back to herself again. I read the note above with the man living in a tent. Thats where she is headed. Is this seriously ethical? Your assistant told a US Congressman that a decision was made and would be mailed out last week and when her lawyer called to verify, she stated a decision was not made. This is uncalled for. What are the work hours being spent on??????
Judge, I am writing for a friend in Florida. Can you tell me why it has already been five months and this poor girl has no decision? I watched EMT's bring her back to life after a life threatening seizure. She can not be left unattended as she falls due to neuro issues and is becoming so depressed and withdrawn I dont even know if she will ever get back to herself again. I read the note above with the man living in a tent. Thats where she is headed. Is this seriously ethical? Your assistant told a US Congressman that a decision was made and would be mailed out last week and when her lawyer called to verify, she stated a decision was not made. This is uncalled for. What are the work hours being spent on??????
Do you ever believe what the claimants ever say? I know someone who is disabled and can't work and you said that her testimony was not credible. Yet you would probably approve a claim for some lazy person who just want to abuse the system. Or, maybe you're saving the government money for those illegal aliens who are getting amnesty from the President. What a waste of humanity. I would rate this judge with 0 stars.
Do you ever believe what the claimants ever say? I know someone who is disabled and can't work and you said that her testimony was not credible. Yet you would probably approve a claim for some lazy person who just want to abuse the system. Or, maybe you're saving the government money for those illegal aliens who are getting amnesty from the President. What a waste of humanity. I would rate this judge with 0 stars.
Do you ever believe what the claimants ever say? I know someone who is disabled and can't work and you said that her testimony was not credible. Yet you would probably approve a claim for some lazy person who just want to abuse the system. Or, maybe you're saving the government money for those illegal aliens who are getting amnesty from the President. What a waste of humanity. I would rate this judge with 0 stars.
Most insensitive and basically unfair judge i have ever read about. Ignored important info and did not consider all of the facts. I feel sorry for anyone that gets her as a judge. I won't even give her 1 star
Most insensitive and basically unfair judge i have ever read about. Ignored important info and did not consider all of the facts. I feel sorry for anyone that gets her as a judge. I won't even give her 1 star
Most insensitive and basically unfair judge i have ever read about. Ignored important info and did not consider all of the facts. I feel sorry for anyone that gets her as a judge. I won't even give her 1 star
If you get this judge, I wish you well because she doesn't consider all of the facts. Her job is to discredit, disapprove, and disappoint those who truly deserve and need their benefits.
If you get this judge, I wish you well because she doesn't consider all of the facts. Her job is to discredit, disapprove, and disappoint those who truly deserve and need their benefits.
If you get this judge, I wish you well because she doesn't consider all of the facts. Her job is to discredit, disapprove, and disappoint those who truly deserve and need their benefits.
She’s a joke the vocational expert said there were no jobs I could do and she still denied me I’m appealing.
She’s a joke the vocational expert said there were no jobs I could do and she still denied me I’m appealing.
She’s a joke the vocational expert said there were no jobs I could do and she still denied me I’m appealing.
This Judge is Misleading , and dishonest plays the game well and is hurtful in my opinion to society. If the system is truly broke, you might want to start with her in considering why this is. Integrity is missing, Cruelty is verified , A none independent thinker and irrational in her decision making. (poster child for +++) if you would like to witness Orwell 1984 go listen to a disembodied VE, over a phone while trying to keep your head up to stare at a TV to communicate with this Judge, That alone should tell you how much of a criminal everyone looks like in the eyes of our GOV. It is a Humiliating and repugnant experience to be dragged in front of a hearing disabled only to be Harmed with a denial and being called a liar by someone who expressed the cruelty , and carelessness of the beast system well. Pray for our Country.. I mean it, because praying for just the people is not enough.
This Judge is Misleading , and dishonest plays the game well and is hurtful in my opinion to society. If the system is truly broke, you might want to start with her in considering why this is. Integrity is missing, Cruelty is verified , A none independent thinker and irrational in her decision making. (poster child for +++) if you would like to witness Orwell 1984 go listen to a disembodied VE, over a phone while trying to keep your head up to stare at a TV to communicate with this Judge, That alone should tell you how much of a criminal everyone looks like in the eyes of our GOV. It is a Humiliating and repugnant experience to be dragged in front of a hearing disabled only to be Harmed with a denial and being called a liar by someone who expressed the cruelty , and carelessness of the beast system well. Pray for our Country.. I mean it, because praying for just the people is not enough.
This Judge is Misleading , and dishonest plays the game well and is hurtful in my opinion to society. If the system is truly broke, you might want to start with her in considering why this is. Integrity is missing, Cruelty is verified , A none independent thinker and irrational in her decision making. (poster child for +++) if you would like to witness Orwell 1984 go listen to a disembodied VE, over a phone while trying to keep your head up to stare at a TV to communicate with this Judge, That alone should tell you how much of a criminal everyone looks like in the eyes of our GOV. It is a Humiliating and repugnant experience to be dragged in front of a hearing disabled only to be Harmed with a denial and being called a liar by someone who expressed the cruelty , and carelessness of the beast system well. Pray for our Country.. I mean it, because praying for just the people is not enough.
Very kind, very nice
Very kind, very nice
Very kind, very nice
Judge Moises Pernalver Por que me lo Negaste No Favorable si me encuentro Bastante Mal De Salud Estoy Ahora Mismo con Una Depresion Bastante Grande Hasta de Quitarme la Vida Te Mande Todos mis Recor Medico para que Viera como Esta mi salud esta bien Demejorada y no pudiste Verla o analirza con un Especilista de la medicina Tengo la Columna Vertebrar con muchas complicasiones te mande el MRI Tengo Asma Cronica Alta Prescion Soy Diabetico Sufro De Depresion y Anciedad TodoEsos Recor Medicos Te Lo Mandamos Toda Esa Pruebas Que Mas Queria Usted Señor Jues Muchas Gracias y que El Señor Lo Bendiga ......... 2/15 /1972
Judge Moises Pernalver Por que me lo Negaste No Favorable si me encuentro Bastante Mal De Salud Estoy Ahora Mismo con Una Depresion Bastante Grande Hasta de Quitarme la Vida Te Mande Todos mis Recor Medico para que Viera como Esta mi salud esta bien Demejorada y no pudiste Verla o analirza con un Especilista de la medicina Tengo la Columna Vertebrar con muchas complicasiones te mande el MRI Tengo Asma Cronica Alta Prescion Soy Diabetico Sufro De Depresion y Anciedad TodoEsos Recor Medicos Te Lo Mandamos Toda Esa Pruebas Que Mas Queria Usted Señor Jues Muchas Gracias y que El Señor Lo Bendiga ......... 2/15 /1972
Judge Moises Pernalver Por que me lo Negaste No Favorable si me encuentro Bastante Mal De Salud Estoy Ahora Mismo con Una Depresion Bastante Grande Hasta de Quitarme la Vida Te Mande Todos mis Recor Medico para que Viera como Esta mi salud esta bien Demejorada y no pudiste Verla o analirza con un Especilista de la medicina Tengo la Columna Vertebrar con muchas complicasiones te mande el MRI Tengo Asma Cronica Alta Prescion Soy Diabetico Sufro De Depresion y Anciedad TodoEsos Recor Medicos Te Lo Mandamos Toda Esa Pruebas Que Mas Queria Usted Señor Jues Muchas Gracias y que El Señor Lo Bendiga ......... 2/15 /1972
I have never felt so at ease in court, but with Judge Penalver; it was smooth. Very attentive to details, and a gentleman when speaking.
I have never felt so at ease in court, but with Judge Penalver; it was smooth. Very attentive to details, and a gentleman when speaking.
I have never felt so at ease in court, but with Judge Penalver; it was smooth. Very attentive to details, and a gentleman when speaking.
Very nice and unbiased. I am appreciative to have been able to sit before this ALJ.
Very nice and unbiased. I am appreciative to have been able to sit before this ALJ.
Very nice and unbiased. I am appreciative to have been able to sit before this ALJ.
This judge, Sally Reason, is the most unprofessional, crass, cruel, **** of a MORON I have ever had the MISFORTUNE to come across in my life. She must be the most miserable person I have EVER met, and enjoys, clearly, taking out her misery on others by using her dictatorial control over people who are SICK and WEAK. She is HORRIBLE and has NO HEART to speak of. I hope she gets SICK and dies a LONG, HORRIBLE death with an illness no doctor can ever figure out and doesn't believe her, the way she doesn't believe any patients who come in, out of sheer desperation, against every fiber of their being, against their pride, who have never done anything but GIVE their entire lives but, because of a stroke of bad luck, they are now desperate and truly alone, and NEED help. I have a letter from my psychiatrist, which I am positive she never read, warning her of the high risk of lethality of my situation (I have already attempted suicide, SERIOUSLY, and ONLY survived by the grace of God, unfortunately, because I am in horrible, chronic, intractable pain and don't have a dime to my name. If healthy, I can work and make a pretty penny. But I CAN NOT WORK. She so much as called me a liar when I asked why, when my psychiatrist was insistent he be there as my witness, that - not only could he NOT come, but he would be turned away and it would jeopardize my hearing. She said she did not believe me and asked for names. I gave her 3. She said she did not believe me. This woman should be removed from the bench. She is a menace and just a ROTTEN human being. I hope she suffers a long, PAINFUL illness, and no one will help her. **** HER.
This judge, Sally Reason, is the most unprofessional, crass, cruel, **** of a MORON I have ever had the MISFORTUNE to come across in my life. She must be the most miserable person I have EVER met, and enjoys, clearly, taking out her misery on others by using her dictatorial control over people who are SICK and WEAK. She is HORRIBLE and has NO HEART to speak of. I hope she gets SICK and dies a LONG, HORRIBLE death with an illness no doctor can ever figure out and doesn't believe her, the way she doesn't believe any patients who come in, out of sheer desperation, against every fiber of their being, against their pride, who have never done anything but GIVE their entire lives but, because of a stroke of bad luck, they are now desperate and truly alone, and NEED help. I have a letter from my psychiatrist, which I am positive she never read, warning her of the high risk of lethality of my situation (I have already attempted suicide, SERIOUSLY, and ONLY survived by the grace of God, unfortunately, because I am in horrible, chronic, intractable pain and don't have a dime to my name. If healthy, I can work and make a pretty penny. But I CAN NOT WORK. She so much as called me a liar when I asked why, when my psychiatrist was insistent he be there as my witness, that - not only could he NOT come, but he would be turned away and it would jeopardize my hearing. She said she did not believe me and asked for names. I gave her 3. She said she did not believe me. This woman should be removed from the bench. She is a menace and just a ROTTEN human being. I hope she suffers a long, PAINFUL illness, and no one will help her. **** HER.
This judge, Sally Reason, is the most unprofessional, crass, cruel, **** of a MORON I have ever had the MISFORTUNE to come across in my life. She must be the most miserable person I have EVER met, and enjoys, clearly, taking out her misery on others by using her dictatorial control over people who are SICK and WEAK. She is HORRIBLE and has NO HEART to speak of. I hope she gets SICK and dies a LONG, HORRIBLE death with an illness no doctor can ever figure out and doesn't believe her, the way she doesn't believe any patients who come in, out of sheer desperation, against every fiber of their being, against their pride, who have never done anything but GIVE their entire lives but, because of a stroke of bad luck, they are now desperate and truly alone, and NEED help. I have a letter from my psychiatrist, which I am positive she never read, warning her of the high risk of lethality of my situation (I have already attempted suicide, SERIOUSLY, and ONLY survived by the grace of God, unfortunately, because I am in horrible, chronic, intractable pain and don't have a dime to my name. If healthy, I can work and make a pretty penny. But I CAN NOT WORK. She so much as called me a liar when I asked why, when my psychiatrist was insistent he be there as my witness, that - not only could he NOT come, but he would be turned away and it would jeopardize my hearing. She said she did not believe me and asked for names. I gave her 3. She said she did not believe me. This woman should be removed from the bench. She is a menace and just a ROTTEN human being. I hope she suffers a long, PAINFUL illness, and no one will help her. **** HER.
A very evil person.
A very evil person.
A very evil person.
One of the toughest ALJs in California and all the West. As a SSD lawyer, I have seen most of the ALJs west of the Mississippi. She is probably the toughest. It is not just that her approval rate is low. She just makes it difficult for attorneys. Everything is a leading question to this ALJ. She comes off as fairly nice with a distinct Southern drawl. But she will absolutely make ridiculous decisions. Files need to be well developed to win with her. Funny that she is the chief ALJ in West LA. I would not say evil person like the above comment. But definitely not friendly. And more importantly, not claimant friendly at all.
One of the toughest ALJs in California and all the West. As a SSD lawyer, I have seen most of the ALJs west of the Mississippi. She is probably the toughest. It is not just that her approval rate is low. She just makes it difficult for attorneys. Everything is a leading question to this ALJ. She comes off as fairly nice with a distinct Southern drawl. But she will absolutely make ridiculous decisions. Files need to be well developed to win with her. Funny that she is the chief ALJ in West LA. I would not say evil person like the above comment. But definitely not friendly. And more importantly, not claimant friendly at all.
One of the toughest ALJs in California and all the West. As a SSD lawyer, I have seen most of the ALJs west of the Mississippi. She is probably the toughest. It is not just that her approval rate is low. She just makes it difficult for attorneys. Everything is a leading question to this ALJ. She comes off as fairly nice with a distinct Southern drawl. But she will absolutely make ridiculous decisions. Files need to be well developed to win with her. Funny that she is the chief ALJ in West LA. I would not say evil person like the above comment. But definitely not friendly. And more importantly, not claimant friendly at all.
ALJ Reason denied my claim, and reading the unfavorable decision letter, it's shocking how much she cherry-picked the information, ignored my long-time treating physician's opinion for two doctors that I had never met, and disregarded the VE testimony. Easy to see why her denial rate is so high.
ALJ Reason denied my claim, and reading the unfavorable decision letter, it's shocking how much she cherry-picked the information, ignored my long-time treating physician's opinion for two doctors that I had never met, and disregarded the VE testimony. Easy to see why her denial rate is so high.
ALJ Reason denied my claim, and reading the unfavorable decision letter, it's shocking how much she cherry-picked the information, ignored my long-time treating physician's opinion for two doctors that I had never met, and disregarded the VE testimony. Easy to see why her denial rate is so high.
This decision to dismiss, ignorant of Federal regulation, Claimants rights, lacking authority, guilty of error of law, unfairness, bias, discrimination and faulty procedures created an unwarranted delay in this claimants right to due process resulting in erroneous deprivation of entitlement to disability payments. It is unfair to offer the disabled relief in a waiver of appearance and then dismiss due to failure to appear. I also feel discriminated against as a member of a protected class of disabled citizens by this apparent policy of ignorance of the waiver of appearance. Taxpayer money was wasted by ordering a Vocational Expert to testify despite overwhelming favorable evidence, advanced age and the stated intention of the claimant not to appear at the hearing and with the creation of additional workload on other SSA divisions in having to respond to the allegations contained in this request. This claimant becomes complainant and wishes to file this communication as a complaint to the Division of Quality Service to investigate this matter as a potential pattern of error of law, bias, discrimination, improper procedure and unfairness resulting in a waste of money, an adversarial atmosphere, subversion of due process, erosion of the public trust and confidence in the administrative hearing process as conducted by this ALJ.
This decision to dismiss, ignorant of Federal regulation, Claimants rights, lacking authority, guilty of error of law, unfairness, bias, discrimination and faulty procedures created an unwarranted delay in this claimants right to due process resulting in erroneous deprivation of entitlement to disability payments. It is unfair to offer the disabled relief in a waiver of appearance and then dismiss due to failure to appear. I also feel discriminated against as a member of a protected class of disabled citizens by this apparent policy of ignorance of the waiver of appearance. Taxpayer money was wasted by ordering a Vocational Expert to testify despite overwhelming favorable evidence, advanced age and the stated intention of the claimant not to appear at the hearing and with the creation of additional workload on other SSA divisions in having to respond to the allegations contained in this request. This claimant becomes complainant and wishes to file this communication as a complaint to the Division of Quality Service to investigate this matter as a potential pattern of error of law, bias, discrimination, improper procedure and unfairness resulting in a waste of money, an adversarial atmosphere, subversion of due process, erosion of the public trust and confidence in the administrative hearing process as conducted by this ALJ.
This decision to dismiss, ignorant of Federal regulation, Claimants rights, lacking authority, guilty of error of law, unfairness, bias, discrimination and faulty procedures created an unwarranted delay in this claimants right to due process resulting in erroneous deprivation of entitlement to disability payments. It is unfair to offer the disabled relief in a waiver of appearance and then dismiss due to failure to appear. I also feel discriminated against as a member of a protected class of disabled citizens by this apparent policy of ignorance of the waiver of appearance. Taxpayer money was wasted by ordering a Vocational Expert to testify despite overwhelming favorable evidence, advanced age and the stated intention of the claimant not to appear at the hearing and with the creation of additional workload on other SSA divisions in having to respond to the allegations contained in this request. This claimant becomes complainant and wishes to file this communication as a complaint to the Division of Quality Service to investigate this matter as a potential pattern of error of law, bias, discrimination, improper procedure and unfairness resulting in a waste of money, an adversarial atmosphere, subversion of due process, erosion of the public trust and confidence in the administrative hearing process as conducted by this ALJ.
This decision to dismiss, ignorant of Federal regulation, Claimants rights, lacking authority, guilty of error of law, unfairness, bias, discrimination and faulty procedures created an unwarranted delay in this claimants right to due process resulting in erroneous deprivation of entitlement to disability payments. It is unfair to offer the disabled relief in a waiver of appearance and then dismiss due to failure to appear. I also feel discriminated against as a member of a protected class of disabled citizens by this apparent policy of ignorance of the waiver of appearance. Taxpayer money was wasted by ordering a Vocational Expert to testify despite overwhelming favorable evidence, advanced age and the stated intention of the claimant not to appear at the hearing and with the creation of additional workload on other SSA divisions in having to respond to the allegations contained in this request. This claimant becomes complainant and wishes to file this communication as a complaint to the Division of Quality Service to investigate this matter as a potential pattern of error of law, bias, discrimination, improper procedure and unfairness resulting in a waste of money, an adversarial atmosphere, subversion of due process, erosion of the public trust and confidence in the administrative hearing process as conducted by this ALJ.
Sally Reason should not be titled as a Judge. She is a person that knows how to LIE and keep a straight face. I know that she had very low approval from 124 disposition in 2013 and the reason is because she has become comfortable in here job by getting away with her LIES. In my case since June 1,2011 she has ignored my doctors notes that I have SEVERE injury to my neck w/ medical proof of X-Ray Cervical Spine and she writes in her last Denied letter that no Doctors had mentioned that my injury was "SEVERE" and that is a LIE in black & white. She also LIES about me in her Denied letter that I go shopping few times a day, lift heavy items, doing laundry, cleaning at my life testimony and those are bunch of LIES, I told her that my 2 children are helping me with those items, also she asked me about cooking at home but I told her that we use convinience food such as take out or TV meals but she wrote in the Denial letter that I do cooking and that is Just Pure LIES. Sally Reason has no fear of LYING because there is no that could check her work, therefore each one us should file a complaint with DQS and let them know about this ALJ. (Division of Quality Service) One Skyline Tower 5107 Leesburg Pike Suite 1605 Falls Church, VA 22041 Sally Reason don't realize that for many of us this is the only income we have in my case as a single dad at age 61.
Sally Reason should not be titled as a Judge. She is a person that knows how to LIE and keep a straight face. I know that she had very low approval from 124 disposition in 2013 and the reason is because she has become comfortable in here job by getting away with her LIES. In my case since June 1,2011 she has ignored my doctors notes that I have SEVERE injury to my neck w/ medical proof of X-Ray Cervical Spine and she writes in her last Denied letter that no Doctors had mentioned that my injury was "SEVERE" and that is a LIE in black & white. She also LIES about me in her Denied letter that I go shopping few times a day, lift heavy items, doing laundry, cleaning at my life testimony and those are bunch of LIES, I told her that my 2 children are helping me with those items, also she asked me about cooking at home but I told her that we use convinience food such as take out or TV meals but she wrote in the Denial letter that I do cooking and that is Just Pure LIES. Sally Reason has no fear of LYING because there is no that could check her work, therefore each one us should file a complaint with DQS and let them know about this ALJ. (Division of Quality Service) One Skyline Tower 5107 Leesburg Pike Suite 1605 Falls Church, VA 22041 Sally Reason don't realize that for many of us this is the only income we have in my case as a single dad at age 61.
Sally Reason should not be titled as a Judge. She is a person that knows how to LIE and keep a straight face. I know that she had very low approval from 124 disposition in 2013 and the reason is because she has become comfortable in here job by getting away with her LIES. In my case since June 1,2011 she has ignored my doctors notes that I have SEVERE injury to my neck w/ medical proof of X-Ray Cervical Spine and she writes in her last Denied letter that no Doctors had mentioned that my injury was "SEVERE" and that is a LIE in black & white. She also LIES about me in her Denied letter that I go shopping few times a day, lift heavy items, doing laundry, cleaning at my life testimony and those are bunch of LIES, I told her that my 2 children are helping me with those items, also she asked me about cooking at home but I told her that we use convinience food such as take out or TV meals but she wrote in the Denial letter that I do cooking and that is Just Pure LIES. Sally Reason has no fear of LYING because there is no that could check her work, therefore each one us should file a complaint with DQS and let them know about this ALJ. (Division of Quality Service) One Skyline Tower 5107 Leesburg Pike Suite 1605 Falls Church, VA 22041 Sally Reason don't realize that for many of us this is the only income we have in my case as a single dad at age 61.
this woman, and others, need to have action taken against them. the only way to do that is voting to get them disbarred and/or not re-elected. whatever this means, the public must keep vigilant on her readmission to this board. what this woman represents is an individual that has not one iota in the interest in the human quality of others and their needs, but protecting the monies of the SS Administration. That is her only function. she will do everything she can balance the scales in her favor. i strongly suggest to watch the role she plays in upcoming elections and/or find out how to remove her to the point that at least she is not involved in lives of people who need true assistance. there are people who are losers and try to abuse the system, but there are just a many and more who are very honest people.
this woman, and others, need to have action taken against them. the only way to do that is voting to get them disbarred and/or not re-elected. whatever this means, the public must keep vigilant on her readmission to this board. what this woman represents is an individual that has not one iota in the interest in the human quality of others and their needs, but protecting the monies of the SS Administration. That is her only function. she will do everything she can balance the scales in her favor. i strongly suggest to watch the role she plays in upcoming elections and/or find out how to remove her to the point that at least she is not involved in lives of people who need true assistance. there are people who are losers and try to abuse the system, but there are just a many and more who are very honest people.
this woman, and others, need to have action taken against them. the only way to do that is voting to get them disbarred and/or not re-elected. whatever this means, the public must keep vigilant on her readmission to this board. what this woman represents is an individual that has not one iota in the interest in the human quality of others and their needs, but protecting the monies of the SS Administration. That is her only function. she will do everything she can balance the scales in her favor. i strongly suggest to watch the role she plays in upcoming elections and/or find out how to remove her to the point that at least she is not involved in lives of people who need true assistance. there are people who are losers and try to abuse the system, but there are just a many and more who are very honest people.
unbelievably unfair, unprofessional, heartless person. People you are so correct that she should absolutely not given a power to decide peoples cases as seems like she has no clue what she is doing. i really do not want to use big words all i do is i pray to God for justice.
unbelievably unfair, unprofessional, heartless person. People you are so correct that she should absolutely not given a power to decide peoples cases as seems like she has no clue what she is doing. i really do not want to use big words all i do is i pray to God for justice.
unbelievably unfair, unprofessional, heartless person. People you are so correct that she should absolutely not given a power to decide peoples cases as seems like she has no clue what she is doing. i really do not want to use big words all i do is i pray to God for justice.
Good Judge. Thanks for at least reviewing my case.
Good Judge. Thanks for at least reviewing my case.
Good Judge. Thanks for at least reviewing my case.
All the Above !! she don't give a ****. lol
All the Above !! she don't give a ****. lol
All the Above !! she don't give a ****. lol
She made false claims of no proof when it was brought to my case w all of my records shown by my attorney.
She made false claims of no proof when it was brought to my case w all of my records shown by my attorney.
She made false claims of no proof when it was brought to my case w all of my records shown by my attorney.
She made false claims of no proof of disability when all of my records were brought to my trial, all records shown by my attorney.
She made false claims of no proof of disability when all of my records were brought to my trial, all records shown by my attorney.
She made false claims of no proof of disability when all of my records were brought to my trial, all records shown by my attorney.
This Judge is completely inadequate and should not be a judge. She makes false accusations and does not take Doctors records/ Diagnoses into account only goes off what she claims. She is unprofessional and rude, cuts off attorney when they are speaking especially when they are proving what her and her "Expert" doctor is saying to be untrue.
This Judge is completely inadequate and should not be a judge. She makes false accusations and does not take Doctors records/ Diagnoses into account only goes off what she claims. She is unprofessional and rude, cuts off attorney when they are speaking especially when they are proving what her and her "Expert" doctor is saying to be untrue.
This Judge is completely inadequate and should not be a judge. She makes false accusations and does not take Doctors records/ Diagnoses into account only goes off what she claims. She is unprofessional and rude, cuts off attorney when they are speaking especially when they are proving what her and her "Expert" doctor is saying to be untrue.
This so called "Judge" was a "Hard Hearted Hanna" She had ALL of my info right in front of her, and did NOT review it properly. My attorney tried to bring it to her attention, and she would cut off my attorney from speaking in a very rude manner. She even had the nerve to be LATE by almost 1 hour, which made me lose my ride home. The judge even had a Doctor on the phone to explain what my X-rays showed, but this wasn't enough for her to approve my case. I can no longer work due to my physical and mental disabilities. I told her that I was in constant pain, & no longer mentally competent to go back into the workforce. I explained that to her, and she had a smirk on her face. Judge "Un" Reason "able" should NOT be allowed to rule in disability cases. She has no inkling of what it is like to be unable ask for the money that you have rightfully earned, when they deducted from MY past paychecks to pay for my OWN survival. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being Worst... Judge Reason gets a BIG FAT 1. I can only pray that she will get some compassion and understanding for people in need. SMDH.
This so called "Judge" was a "Hard Hearted Hanna" She had ALL of my info right in front of her, and did NOT review it properly. My attorney tried to bring it to her attention, and she would cut off my attorney from speaking in a very rude manner. She even had the nerve to be LATE by almost 1 hour, which made me lose my ride home. The judge even had a Doctor on the phone to explain what my X-rays showed, but this wasn't enough for her to approve my case. I can no longer work due to my physical and mental disabilities. I told her that I was in constant pain, & no longer mentally competent to go back into the workforce. I explained that to her, and she had a smirk on her face. Judge "Un" Reason "able" should NOT be allowed to rule in disability cases. She has no inkling of what it is like to be unable ask for the money that you have rightfully earned, when they deducted from MY past paychecks to pay for my OWN survival. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being Worst... Judge Reason gets a BIG FAT 1. I can only pray that she will get some compassion and understanding for people in need. SMDH.
This so called "Judge" was a "Hard Hearted Hanna" She had ALL of my info right in front of her, and did NOT review it properly. My attorney tried to bring it to her attention, and she would cut off my attorney from speaking in a very rude manner. She even had the nerve to be LATE by almost 1 hour, which made me lose my ride home. The judge even had a Doctor on the phone to explain what my X-rays showed, but this wasn't enough for her to approve my case. I can no longer work due to my physical and mental disabilities. I told her that I was in constant pain, & no longer mentally competent to go back into the workforce. I explained that to her, and she had a smirk on her face. Judge "Un" Reason "able" should NOT be allowed to rule in disability cases. She has no inkling of what it is like to be unable ask for the money that you have rightfully earned, when they deducted from MY past paychecks to pay for my OWN survival. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being Worst... Judge Reason gets a BIG FAT 1. I can only pray that she will get some compassion and understanding for people in need. SMDH.
This is the most ******, unprofessional ***** ** **** I had ever ran across of in my entire life. This judge has a very bad attitude that is very unprofessional and if you are black you don't stand a chance with her. She doesn't care if you are disabled she is going to definitely deny you your social security just to anger you and for the process of it taking another 2 years or more to be heard again by the Appeal Council who will not correct her judicial errors. I wish God would just exterminate this woman's life immediately because she doesn't deserve to be walking and breathing on this earth, she definitely deserves to be cremated.
This is the most ******, unprofessional ***** ** **** I had ever ran across of in my entire life. This judge has a very bad attitude that is very unprofessional and if you are black you don't stand a chance with her. She doesn't care if you are disabled she is going to definitely deny you your social security just to anger you and for the process of it taking another 2 years or more to be heard again by the Appeal Council who will not correct her judicial errors. I wish God would just exterminate this woman's life immediately because she doesn't deserve to be walking and breathing on this earth, she definitely deserves to be cremated.
This is the most ******, unprofessional ***** ** **** I had ever ran across of in my entire life. This judge has a very bad attitude that is very unprofessional and if you are black you don't stand a chance with her. She doesn't care if you are disabled she is going to definitely deny you your social security just to anger you and for the process of it taking another 2 years or more to be heard again by the Appeal Council who will not correct her judicial errors. I wish God would just exterminate this woman's life immediately because she doesn't deserve to be walking and breathing on this earth, she definitely deserves to be cremated.
a * d
a * d
a * d
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
All of the vitriolic comments about Sally C. Reason are justified. In her decisions she does make false representations of diagnoses and prognoses by claimants' physicians. She does misrepresent claimants' testimony regarding daily activities. She does cherry pick from the records. She does invent damning "facts" for which there is no evidence in the record. ***** In the case with which I am intimately familiar, Sally C. Reason declared the claimant "less than credible" because Claimant's work ethic pushed her to work fulltime, with unrelenting pain, for 17 years before severe, degenerative spinal injuries and related bone diseases became unbearable at the age of 62. ***** In other cases, Sally C. Reason rejected a claim because "Claimant had an extremely poor work history and showed little propensity to work in her lifetime" AND another claimant "has not had a consistent history of prior employment on a full-time basis, calling into question her motivation to work." ***** So...According to Sally C. Reason, having a "poor work history" is evidence a person isn't disabled, while continuing to work past the onset of a degenerative disease is evidence a person isn't disabled. ***** Among Sally C. Reason's decisions that have been overturned by the federal district court, she repeatedly has been admonished for dismissing the opinions of the treating physicians: (1) "The ALJ Failed To Properly Consider Plaintiff's Treating Physician's Opinion....(Reason's) "conclusion is contradicted by the record." --(2) "The ALJ may not substitute her lay opinion for those of the medical sources in the record." *** "Because the ALJ failed to provide adequate reasons for rejecting Dr. ______'s opinions, this Court credits them as a matter of law." --(3) "The ALJ's improper rejection of Dr. _____'s opinion and substitution of her own lay medical opinion constitutes reversible error....Indeed, it appears that the ALJ's RFC assessment is nothing more than her own lay medical opinion." ***** IN THE PARTICULAR CASE I WITNESSED, during the hearing the Sally C. Reason asked, "Are you able to do your cooking?" Claimant: "No." Sally C. Reason: "Have you cooked a lot more in the past and don't do it anymore, or...?" Claimant: "Before the accident I used to cook a lot, but now I don't ever cook." -- In her decision, Sally C. Reason reported "(Claimant) Is Able to Prepare Simple Meals." ***** Sally C. Reason GROSSLY MISREPRESENTED TESTIMONY OF CLAIMANT REGARDING TREATMENTS SHE HAS RECEIVED FOR PAIN. Sally C. Reason wrote, "The Claimant noted that no surgery has been recommended for her condition, she has not received any pain relief injections in some time." --- Sally C. Reason uses that statement to support her accusation of the Claimant's "exaggerating" her symptoms. --- (1) In that statement, however, Sally C. Reason carefully OMITS THE CONTEXTS surrounding the "no surgery" and "pain relief injections" references. Sally C. Reason carefully avoids evidence in the record that explains the trigger point injections were discontinued because they were ineffective in treating Claimant's severe injuries; Sally C. Reason presents that as evidence that Claimant's injuries weren't serious enough to merit continuing the injections -- the exact opposite of the truth. --- (2) Sally C. Reason states "no surgery has been recommended for her condition" but omits the fact that none has been recommended because there is no appropriate surgery for Plaintiff's injury. ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED THE FREQUENCY AND REGULARITY OF TREATMENT BY CLAIMANT'S TREATING PHYSICIAN. Sally C. Reason declared, "There is sparse evidence of regular, ongoing treatment with Dr. _____ between 2014 and 2016." The record, however, shows that Dr. ____ treated the claimant *18* times between 2014 and 2016, in a regular and ongoing basis. ***** Sally C. Reason claimed "There are no records of diagnostic scans showing degenerative disc or joint conditions." Earlier in her decision, however, Sally C. Reason noted, "A thoracic spine CT scan revealed multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion." -- It is impossible to argue that a CT scan which reveals "multi-level degenerative changes including compression deformities and disc protrusion" — a form of spinal disc deterioration that typically causes back pain — is not a diagnostic scan showing degenerative disc conditions. ***** Sally C. Reason falsely claimed the latest CT scan shows "no further deterioration or additional spine changes." In reality, that CT scan reveals two new compression fractures, a new disc protrusion, and degeneration of an existing compression fracture of "up to 70% anterior height loss." While you might not be familiar with the terminology, any orthopedic surgeon will confirm those new conditions indeed represent "further deterioration or spine changes." ***** Sally C. Reason FALSELY CHARACTERIZED RESULTS of The Newest Thoracic Spine CT Scan vs. Earlier CT Scan Results. Sally C. Reason stated, "In fact, as noted above, a thoracic spine CT scan showed the same multi-level degenerative changes" as seen in an earlier CT scan. That simply is untrue. The newest thoracic spine CT scan represents the first time disc protrusion has been observed, and it represents the first appearance in the record of two ADDITIONAL compression fractures. ***** Sally C. Reason Falsely Declared the Injuries to be "Unlikely to Produce Intensity and Persistence of Pain the Plaintiff Reports." Sally C. Reason's omission of the newly discovered spinal compression resulting in up to 70% anterior height loss conveniently makes it unnecessary for her to explain why her layman's viewpoint of the effects of a 70% thoracic compression fracture should be accepted over that of the accepted viewpoint of the entire medical community. ----- According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "The loss of height that results from a compression fracture may lead to chronic back pain...and accelerate the degeneration of adjacent spinal segments. The back pain and associated fatigue can severely limit a patient’s quality of life...." The NIH is describing exactly the symptoms reported by the Claimant, under exactly the conditions reported by the Claimant. ***** Sally C. Reason POSED A MISLEADING HYPOTHETICAL TO THE VOCATIONAL EXPERT, omitting most of the Claimant's impairments and limitations. This is one of Sally C. Reason's common tactics, for which she already has been reprimanded by the district court. (More on that later.) ***** Sally C. Reason refused to allow Claimant's attorney to cross-examine the 10-year retired "rent a doctor" who Sally C. Reason had arranged to testify -- based upon his cursory review of the medical history -- to rebut the findings of the two board certified specialists who treated the Claimant for the previous 5 years. ***** Sally C. Reason used another of her favorite tactics: citing the Claimant's "daily activities" as reason for finding her not credible. Sally C. Reason repeatedly has had her decisions overturned despite the The Ninth Circuit Court's repeated declaration that, "The mere fact that a plaintiff has carried on certain daily activities DOES NOT IN ANY WAY DETRACT from her credibility as to her overall disability. The ALJ must explain how the claimant's ability to perform these daily activities translates into an ability to do activities that are transferrable to a work setting." --- Inasmuch as fewer than 1% of claimants who are denied benefits appeal in federal court, Sally C. Reason continues to use vague "daily activities" as a reason to deny benefits -- knowing that more than 99% of the time she'll get away with it. ***** STILL NOT CONVINCED of Sally C. Reason duplicity in rendering her decisions? Here are two different reasons she gave for rejecting two different Claimants' claims. ----
Please call Jamie Morris and Todd Spitzer re Kristen Bedrosian asap (714)834-3600 I don't know 1(877)386 0643I asked the district attorney's office to request this but I guess it would be more appropriate for me to ask you this is for payment information and the phone number to call is area code 410-965-0365 once again I'm kind of almost being harassed and it's due to my disability so disregard any recent arrests they say for Social Security prefixes you call that number or this one 410-966-2208 my mom's social prefix is 569 mine is 572 regarding the payment should I and if I do acquire one will you be willing to accept an executive order on my claim sorry I don't have Jamie Morris phone numberI hope your Monday goes better than most people's Friday thank you Miss reason just so you know tomorrow night there's a big block party going on at Union station the LAPD starting and I will be there and I don't have anyone to hang out with so I would like to be surrounded by judges or three-headed king cobras because those to protect her majesty in India
Please call Jamie Morris and Todd Spitzer re Kristen Bedrosian asap (714)834-3600 I don't know 1(877)386 0643I asked the district attorney's office to request this but I guess it would be more appropriate for me to ask you this is for payment information and the phone number to call is area code 410-965-0365 once again I'm kind of almost being harassed and it's due to my disability so disregard any recent arrests they say for Social Security prefixes you call that number or this one 410-966-2208 my mom's social prefix is 569 mine is 572 regarding the payment should I and if I do acquire one will you be willing to accept an executive order on my claim sorry I don't have Jamie Morris phone numberI hope your Monday goes better than most people's Friday thank you Miss reason just so you know tomorrow night there's a big block party going on at Union station the LAPD starting and I will be there and I don't have anyone to hang out with so I would like to be surrounded by judges or three-headed king cobras because those to protect her majesty in India
Please call Jamie Morris and Todd Spitzer re Kristen Bedrosian asap (714)834-3600 I don't know 1(877)386 0643I asked the district attorney's office to request this but I guess it would be more appropriate for me to ask you this is for payment information and the phone number to call is area code 410-965-0365 once again I'm kind of almost being harassed and it's due to my disability so disregard any recent arrests they say for Social Security prefixes you call that number or this one 410-966-2208 my mom's social prefix is 569 mine is 572 regarding the payment should I and if I do acquire one will you be willing to accept an executive order on my claim sorry I don't have Jamie Morris phone numberI hope your Monday goes better than most people's Friday thank you Miss reason just so you know tomorrow night there's a big block party going on at Union station the LAPD starting and I will be there and I don't have anyone to hang out with so I would like to be surrounded by judges or three-headed king cobras because those to protect her majesty in India
Recently went in front of this woman whom Iam finding out she's NOT a real judge. Iam looking into what makes her a judge. Some serious law suits are brewing and a class action is a must in light of such a low approval rates. There can not be so many people filing for 100% disability if there's no foundation. By her, according to witnesses...not having respect for the law and procedures she has become everything that the USA is all about. I have first hand knowledge of her violations of people's constitutional rights under the law. As such, she has become a criminal and must be removed. If anyone has information or has been erroneously been dismissed as a non disabled person by her actions or lack of and is interested in a possible class action suit and or actions to get her removed From her post please call .....please mention this information post... We will keep you informed
Recently went in front of this woman whom Iam finding out she's NOT a real judge. Iam looking into what makes her a judge. Some serious law suits are brewing and a class action is a must in light of such a low approval rates. There can not be so many people filing for 100% disability if there's no foundation. By her, according to witnesses...not having respect for the law and procedures she has become everything that the USA is all about. I have first hand knowledge of her violations of people's constitutional rights under the law. As such, she has become a criminal and must be removed. If anyone has information or has been erroneously been dismissed as a non disabled person by her actions or lack of and is interested in a possible class action suit and or actions to get her removed From her post please call .....please mention this information post... We will keep you informed
Recently went in front of this woman whom Iam finding out she's NOT a real judge. Iam looking into what makes her a judge. Some serious law suits are brewing and a class action is a must in light of such a low approval rates. There can not be so many people filing for 100% disability if there's no foundation. By her, according to witnesses...not having respect for the law and procedures she has become everything that the USA is all about. I have first hand knowledge of her violations of people's constitutional rights under the law. As such, she has become a criminal and must be removed. If anyone has information or has been erroneously been dismissed as a non disabled person by her actions or lack of and is interested in a possible class action suit and or actions to get her removed From her post please call .....please mention this information post... We will keep you informed
Very fair.
Very fair.
Very fair.
She is fair
She is fair
She is fair
She is so kind and also fair.
She is so kind and also fair.
She is so kind and also fair.
very kind
very kind
very kind
Very serious but fair and quick
Very serious but fair and quick
Very serious but fair and quick
I had a hearing on 8/6/2018 at 9:40am. I grew up with a learning disability and now that I'm older I still suffer from a learning disability along with schizo active. When I entered the court all I felt very very nervous all they kept talking about what's marijuana induced psychosis they didn't mention nothing about my learning disability or that I was cut off disability once I went to prison and I still suffer from my conditions it was all about marijuana it wasn't nothing about my learning disability on my schizo active I've been waiting 3 years suffering homeless sleeping in a park just to feel very very uncomfortable in the courtroom I feel like I was left without no direct answers I feel like if you was going to deny me you could have told me right there now I'm over here really really depressed I don't feel any relief can somebody please call me or have my attorney call me please.
I had a hearing on 8/6/2018 at 9:40am. I grew up with a learning disability and now that I'm older I still suffer from a learning disability along with schizo active. When I entered the court all I felt very very nervous all they kept talking about what's marijuana induced psychosis they didn't mention nothing about my learning disability or that I was cut off disability once I went to prison and I still suffer from my conditions it was all about marijuana it wasn't nothing about my learning disability on my schizo active I've been waiting 3 years suffering homeless sleeping in a park just to feel very very uncomfortable in the courtroom I feel like I was left without no direct answers I feel like if you was going to deny me you could have told me right there now I'm over here really really depressed I don't feel any relief can somebody please call me or have my attorney call me please.
I had a hearing on 8/6/2018 at 9:40am. I grew up with a learning disability and now that I'm older I still suffer from a learning disability along with schizo active. When I entered the court all I felt very very nervous all they kept talking about what's marijuana induced psychosis they didn't mention nothing about my learning disability or that I was cut off disability once I went to prison and I still suffer from my conditions it was all about marijuana it wasn't nothing about my learning disability on my schizo active I've been waiting 3 years suffering homeless sleeping in a park just to feel very very uncomfortable in the courtroom I feel like I was left without no direct answers I feel like if you was going to deny me you could have told me right there now I'm over here really really depressed I don't feel any relief can somebody please call me or have my attorney call me please.
Gail Reich was very professional and personable. I wrote my own briefing which she commented on and asked if I was planning on being an attorney anytime soon! Right away she made me feel comfortable and was very fair! Thank you Gail Reich.
Gail Reich was very professional and personable. I wrote my own briefing which she commented on and asked if I was planning on being an attorney anytime soon! Right away she made me feel comfortable and was very fair! Thank you Gail Reich.
Gail Reich was very professional and personable. I wrote my own briefing which she commented on and asked if I was planning on being an attorney anytime soon! Right away she made me feel comfortable and was very fair! Thank you Gail Reich.
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE,
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
MY opinion of this judge is she is very PREJUDICE, I saw it in her demeanor as I was sitting there with my 8 yr old daughter who”s been suffering from numerous seizures since 2009, I applied for this in 2014 & waited for nearly 3 yrs for a hearing & this ***JUDICE judge decided that my daughter was not ill enough (visibly) to her eyes but I would know since I’m her mother , however GOD is the ULTIMATE JUDGE, NOT U ARE NO ONE ELSE, -0 rating
Judge Regina L. Sleater once came to work still intoxicated and when she opened the door to the office kitchen cabinet she slammed it into her head so hard that she passed out on the floor... when she worked in Anchorage, Alaska...she also had liquid lunches at Simon and Seaford and would leave with her glass half full.
Judge Regina L. Sleater once came to work still intoxicated and when she opened the door to the office kitchen cabinet she slammed it into her head so hard that she passed out on the floor... when she worked in Anchorage, Alaska...she also had liquid lunches at Simon and Seaford and would leave with her glass half full.
Judge Regina L. Sleater once came to work still intoxicated and when she opened the door to the office kitchen cabinet she slammed it into her head so hard that she passed out on the floor... when she worked in Anchorage, Alaska...she also had liquid lunches at Simon and Seaford and would leave with her glass half full.
this lady she is not even worth to talk about very prejudice and mean
this lady she is not even worth to talk about very prejudice and mean
this lady she is not even worth to talk about very prejudice and mean
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
Hottest looking ALJ I've seen. Very cute french sounding accent and a nice demeanor as well.
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I don't understand her decision I have twins one approved other denied several times never went to court one other twin but the oldest getting denied they both have the same medical history and they take med everyday which is five to be exact and hopefully when I appeal I will have some type of representation because why do one get approved and the other one keeps getting denied keep in mind they are only three mintues apart bug the oldest twin keep getting denied ever chance I apply
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
I dont think she took in to consideration what I have to go through everyday dealing with children that have ADHD and ODD have twins one approved other one keep being denied I wish she could walk in my shoes and see how it feels to get calls from school because your child cant stay in her seat or that the child is being suspended for fighting hope she one day look at the whole picture and not just her question she asked us
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She was respectful during the hearing and only asked me a few questions briefly the whole time which leads me to believe their mind was made up before I ever got there(her and the vocational "expert". It was determined I could no longer do my old work and at the same time I am supposedly not disabled either because Mr. "Expert" says I can either be a kitchen helper now or a dining room attendant...both with 30% restrictions to bending and lifting and even going so far as to say there were thousands of local jobs doing these things. First of all no one will hire or keep you working with any restrictions and second I can't do them anyway and third...I live in a small town and there aren't thousands of jobs combined anywhere around me. I am very disappointed in the double standard used in the decision. Make up your mind. You say I can't stand or lift and do my old job but I can stand all day and lift in the job you say I should or could have. What a crock. If I could do my old job I could be making 1 to 2 thousand a week on very good weeks. I would have to be crazy to not do that... Maybe I am crazy for thinking I could get a fair shot after all the grief and ginancial upheaval I've been through with this.
She took the time to listen to me and was very caring.
She took the time to listen to me and was very caring.
She took the time to listen to me and was very caring.
I would just like to say I had appeal of judges unfavorable decision I have no knowledge of my decision but I at least felt like I was at least heard this time and treated like a human being as well as treated with respect other than a favorable decision in which I need desperately there is nothing more you could ask of a judge I couldn't type my own reply but I said this to my farther who is doing the typing
I would just like to say I had appeal of judges unfavorable decision I have no knowledge of my decision but I at least felt like I was at least heard this time and treated like a human being as well as treated with respect other than a favorable decision in which I need desperately there is nothing more you could ask of a judge I couldn't type my own reply but I said this to my farther who is doing the typing
I would just like to say I had appeal of judges unfavorable decision I have no knowledge of my decision but I at least felt like I was at least heard this time and treated like a human being as well as treated with respect other than a favorable decision in which I need desperately there is nothing more you could ask of a judge I couldn't type my own reply but I said this to my farther who is doing the typing
I would like to just say she is a fair and just judge she truly listen and provide fair decisions based on the evidence if more judges were this unbiased and did everything on a case by case basis and not under any preconceived stereotype this world would be a better place
I would like to just say she is a fair and just judge she truly listen and provide fair decisions based on the evidence if more judges were this unbiased and did everything on a case by case basis and not under any preconceived stereotype this world would be a better place
I would like to just say she is a fair and just judge she truly listen and provide fair decisions based on the evidence if more judges were this unbiased and did everything on a case by case basis and not under any preconceived stereotype this world would be a better place
Yes, she is French. Yes, she is attractive. But, more importantly, she is reasonable and open to off-the-record discussions of your case regarding onset, DLI, treatment, etc.
Yes, she is French. Yes, she is attractive. But, more importantly, she is reasonable and open to off-the-record discussions of your case regarding onset, DLI, treatment, etc.
Yes, she is French. Yes, she is attractive. But, more importantly, she is reasonable and open to off-the-record discussions of your case regarding onset, DLI, treatment, etc.
Judge Thompson is a very fair lady and listens well. I never spoke to her personally, but know of several of her past co-workers and each states she's a true professional.
Judge Thompson is a very fair lady and listens well. I never spoke to her personally, but know of several of her past co-workers and each states she's a true professional.
Judge Thompson is a very fair lady and listens well. I never spoke to her personally, but know of several of her past co-workers and each states she's a true professional.
Hearing date please, please my bills are pileing up.
Hearing date please, please my bills are pileing up.
Hearing date please, please my bills are pileing up.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
Judge Thompson, could you send me a copy of the package on the appeal, I forwarded to you. My address is 597 Long Hollow Pike, Gallatin, Tn 37066s. I moved and the documents got lost in the scuffle. Thanks for your cooperation, I got a lawyer in Chicago reviewing the case and wants to see the documents.
The disability rules, law, I should of got my disability, but this judge denied me my disability. I am a very sick person, there is days I can barely walk, I honestly don't know if I am going to make it some days.. I have so much pain , so forgetful, the social security doctor said I was disable to work, because of my disease. She mention of me being obesity, and lack of education. It never stopped me working before. I have worked ever since I was 12 years old, worked hard for over 40 years. I have worked for everything I have, and now I am not able to work and about to lose everything I have ever worked for, because I am not able to work, and this Judge made this unfair and inhumane decision, on behalf I felt she is a prejudge Person. It is such a shame that a judge can make this kind of decision, because they don't like a person. What has our country become to. So sad that's it's become that such cases are treated like this. God be with us all.
The disability rules, law, I should of got my disability, but this judge denied me my disability. I am a very sick person, there is days I can barely walk, I honestly don't know if I am going to make it some days.. I have so much pain , so forgetful, the social security doctor said I was disable to work, because of my disease. She mention of me being obesity, and lack of education. It never stopped me working before. I have worked ever since I was 12 years old, worked hard for over 40 years. I have worked for everything I have, and now I am not able to work and about to lose everything I have ever worked for, because I am not able to work, and this Judge made this unfair and inhumane decision, on behalf I felt she is a prejudge Person. It is such a shame that a judge can make this kind of decision, because they don't like a person. What has our country become to. So sad that's it's become that such cases are treated like this. God be with us all.
The disability rules, law, I should of got my disability, but this judge denied me my disability. I am a very sick person, there is days I can barely walk, I honestly don't know if I am going to make it some days.. I have so much pain , so forgetful, the social security doctor said I was disable to work, because of my disease. She mention of me being obesity, and lack of education. It never stopped me working before. I have worked ever since I was 12 years old, worked hard for over 40 years. I have worked for everything I have, and now I am not able to work and about to lose everything I have ever worked for, because I am not able to work, and this Judge made this unfair and inhumane decision, on behalf I felt she is a prejudge Person. It is such a shame that a judge can make this kind of decision, because they don't like a person. What has our country become to. So sad that's it's become that such cases are treated like this. God be with us all.
Fairly negative ALJ. Conducts hearings in fast paced manner. I think she is fairly new but not to bright.
Fairly negative ALJ. Conducts hearings in fast paced manner. I think she is fairly new but not to bright.
Fairly negative ALJ. Conducts hearings in fast paced manner. I think she is fairly new but not to bright.
not too bright is an understaement
not too bright is an understaement
not too bright is an understaement
I was very pleased with her honor, very thorough, precise, and thoughtful.
I was very pleased with her honor, very thorough, precise, and thoughtful.
I was very pleased with her honor, very thorough, precise, and thoughtful.
Judge Warner To do what she is paid to do ask only questions of her witnesses that favors a no decision which she is paid to do!!!!
Judge Warner To do what she is paid to do ask only questions of her witnesses that favors a no decision which she is paid to do!!!!
Judge Warner To do what she is paid to do ask only questions of her witnesses that favors a no decision which she is paid to do!!!!
unless you are non white she will not approve you!!!
unless you are non white she will not approve you!!!
unless you are non white she will not approve you!!!
How can you all down talk her for doing her job.
How can you all down talk her for doing her job.
How can you all down talk her for doing her job.
This lady is a total joke, she has a 70% of "Unfavorable". I'm going to keep on fighting my case, even though it's already been over 4yrs. Go Donald Trump's
This lady is a total joke, she has a 70% of "Unfavorable". I'm going to keep on fighting my case, even though it's already been over 4yrs. Go Donald Trump's
This lady is a total joke, she has a 70% of "Unfavorable". I'm going to keep on fighting my case, even though it's already been over 4yrs. Go Donald Trump's
Judge Watson is a good judge.
Judge Watson is a good judge.
Judge Watson is a good judge.
This judge brags on facebook that she majored in beer drinking at the UO. she has trampy pictures with visible nipples. She should be in prison for fraud and other crimes. What a stupid drunk tramp.
This judge brags on facebook that she majored in beer drinking at the UO. she has trampy pictures with visible nipples. She should be in prison for fraud and other crimes. What a stupid drunk tramp.
This judge brags on facebook that she majored in beer drinking at the UO. she has trampy pictures with visible nipples. She should be in prison for fraud and other crimes. What a stupid drunk tramp.
https://rulesofalgebra.blogspot.com/2016/10/wino-judge-watson.html
https://rulesofalgebra.blogspot.com/2016/10/wino-judge-watson.html
https://rulesofalgebra.blogspot.com/2016/10/wino-judge-watson.html
I question the comment about this judge's facebook page. I have spent the better part of an hour trying to find her on facebook, and have been unsuccessful despite numerous and varied attempts. I do not know what basis the other commenter has for saying she should be in prison for fraud and other crimes, but that particular aspect of the comment sounds probably libelous to me, and I think the comment should be removed unless there is direct evidence to justify it (I am aware of none). I think comments on judges should be limited to facts and to data pertaining to hearing experiences, not to hyperbole and allegations that cannot be substantiated. I have had several hearing experiences with this judge, and each has been a little different, but I have never had the impression that there was something going on to justify the allegations made by Ms. Frisch.
I question the comment about this judge's facebook page. I have spent the better part of an hour trying to find her on facebook, and have been unsuccessful despite numerous and varied attempts. I do not know what basis the other commenter has for saying she should be in prison for fraud and other crimes, but that particular aspect of the comment sounds probably libelous to me, and I think the comment should be removed unless there is direct evidence to justify it (I am aware of none). I think comments on judges should be limited to facts and to data pertaining to hearing experiences, not to hyperbole and allegations that cannot be substantiated. I have had several hearing experiences with this judge, and each has been a little different, but I have never had the impression that there was something going on to justify the allegations made by Ms. Frisch.
I question the comment about this judge's facebook page. I have spent the better part of an hour trying to find her on facebook, and have been unsuccessful despite numerous and varied attempts. I do not know what basis the other commenter has for saying she should be in prison for fraud and other crimes, but that particular aspect of the comment sounds probably libelous to me, and I think the comment should be removed unless there is direct evidence to justify it (I am aware of none). I think comments on judges should be limited to facts and to data pertaining to hearing experiences, not to hyperbole and allegations that cannot be substantiated. I have had several hearing experiences with this judge, and each has been a little different, but I have never had the impression that there was something going on to justify the allegations made by Ms. Frisch.
Esta Jueza es ********** y se ensaña en contra de las Personas y Pacientes incapacitados física y mentalmente, discriminando sin importar la enfermedad terminal que esté padeciendo. No debería estar ocupando ese puesto y tengan consideración de reconocer la necesidad de una real Jueza que Aplique la Ley realmente.
Esta Jueza es ********** y se ensaña en contra de las Personas y Pacientes incapacitados física y mentalmente, discriminando sin importar la enfermedad terminal que esté padeciendo. No debería estar ocupando ese puesto y tengan consideración de reconocer la necesidad de una real Jueza que Aplique la Ley realmente.
Esta Jueza es ********** y se ensaña en contra de las Personas y Pacientes incapacitados física y mentalmente, discriminando sin importar la enfermedad terminal que esté padeciendo. No debería estar ocupando ese puesto y tengan consideración de reconocer la necesidad de una real Jueza que Aplique la Ley realmente.
mrs ena weather, may the lord jesus crist always bless you and your family for seeking justice with such professionalism and from the heart within the justice system determine the decisions you make, may jesus always guide you although you have a geniuses mind to seek the truth in every person that steps with you in court.Thank you for being my judge and reveling the truth. God be with you always!!! Jesus always reveals the truth as you did in my case. Thank you!
mrs ena weather, may the lord jesus crist always bless you and your family for seeking justice with such professionalism and from the heart within the justice system determine the decisions you make, may jesus always guide you although you have a geniuses mind to seek the truth in every person that steps with you in court.Thank you for being my judge and reveling the truth. God be with you always!!! Jesus always reveals the truth as you did in my case. Thank you!
mrs ena weather, may the lord jesus crist always bless you and your family for seeking justice with such professionalism and from the heart within the justice system determine the decisions you make, may jesus always guide you although you have a geniuses mind to seek the truth in every person that steps with you in court.Thank you for being my judge and reveling the truth. God be with you always!!! Jesus always reveals the truth as you did in my case. Thank you!
Judge April M. Wexler is a Judge who is definitely not aware of the fact that many people who are applying for disability are actual people who have serious pre existing and continued long term medical issues and medical problems. I believe she looks at the actual person instead of the combined medical evidence, which includes narratives MRI's, and x-rays provided by the Medical Doctors. Furthermore I believe that Judge Wexler is biased with many of her rulings and decisions. In my case her words to me directly were " If you can drive then you are not DISABLE period regardless of your medical conditions"
Judge April M. Wexler is a Judge who is definitely not aware of the fact that many people who are applying for disability are actual people who have serious pre existing and continued long term medical issues and medical problems. I believe she looks at the actual person instead of the combined medical evidence, which includes narratives MRI's, and x-rays provided by the Medical Doctors. Furthermore I believe that Judge Wexler is biased with many of her rulings and decisions. In my case her words to me directly were " If you can drive then you are not DISABLE period regardless of your medical conditions"
Judge April M. Wexler is a Judge who is definitely not aware of the fact that many people who are applying for disability are actual people who have serious pre existing and continued long term medical issues and medical problems. I believe she looks at the actual person instead of the combined medical evidence, which includes narratives MRI's, and x-rays provided by the Medical Doctors. Furthermore I believe that Judge Wexler is biased with many of her rulings and decisions. In my case her words to me directly were " If you can drive then you are not DISABLE period regardless of your medical conditions"
I sincerely feel bad for the other reviewer and hope that he/she has been approved or better yet, healed, I had a different experience. I am a 38 year old male with MRI's that show bad arthritis in multiple places, tile table was positive for severe orthostatic hypotension. BUT, the rest of my illness is an "invisible illness". I did not exaggerate anything, if anything I under-played my illness (stupid pride). Judge Wexler listened to everything I had to say and appeared attentive to my complex issues. I'm not yet sure if she ruled fully or partially favorable, I just received notice from my local SSA, not yet from ODAR. No matter what her decision, I believe she ruled fairly in my case at least. Now, I need to work on getting more tests and trying to find treatment that works so I can get OFF disability! I take off a star on the assumption that the previous commenter was indeed denied based SOLELY on ability to drive.
I sincerely feel bad for the other reviewer and hope that he/she has been approved or better yet, healed, I had a different experience. I am a 38 year old male with MRI's that show bad arthritis in multiple places, tile table was positive for severe orthostatic hypotension. BUT, the rest of my illness is an "invisible illness". I did not exaggerate anything, if anything I under-played my illness (stupid pride). Judge Wexler listened to everything I had to say and appeared attentive to my complex issues. I'm not yet sure if she ruled fully or partially favorable, I just received notice from my local SSA, not yet from ODAR. No matter what her decision, I believe she ruled fairly in my case at least. Now, I need to work on getting more tests and trying to find treatment that works so I can get OFF disability! I take off a star on the assumption that the previous commenter was indeed denied based SOLELY on ability to drive.
I sincerely feel bad for the other reviewer and hope that he/she has been approved or better yet, healed, I had a different experience. I am a 38 year old male with MRI's that show bad arthritis in multiple places, tile table was positive for severe orthostatic hypotension. BUT, the rest of my illness is an "invisible illness". I did not exaggerate anything, if anything I under-played my illness (stupid pride). Judge Wexler listened to everything I had to say and appeared attentive to my complex issues. I'm not yet sure if she ruled fully or partially favorable, I just received notice from my local SSA, not yet from ODAR. No matter what her decision, I believe she ruled fairly in my case at least. Now, I need to work on getting more tests and trying to find treatment that works so I can get OFF disability! I take off a star on the assumption that the previous commenter was indeed denied based SOLELY on ability to drive.
Judge Wexler is a fair and intelligent judge,she does a great job!
Judge Wexler is a fair and intelligent judge,she does a great job!
Judge Wexler is a fair and intelligent judge,she does a great job!
I'm a 42 which had me worried to begin with. I was quit pleased with Judge Wexler. She listen to what I had to say and treated me fairly. That's all that I ask. I believe she will make a fair ruling based on all the evidence.
I'm a 42 which had me worried to begin with. I was quit pleased with Judge Wexler. She listen to what I had to say and treated me fairly. That's all that I ask. I believe she will make a fair ruling based on all the evidence.
I'm a 42 which had me worried to begin with. I was quit pleased with Judge Wexler. She listen to what I had to say and treated me fairly. That's all that I ask. I believe she will make a fair ruling based on all the evidence.
I had a hearing before Judge Wheeler, he was very nasty and rude. Showed no compassion and eventually dismissed my case. I wonder why the SSA isn't concerned about his high rate of dismissals and low approvals, his numbers are way out of line with the rest of W.LA office, state of CA and the nation as a whole. SSA seemed concerned recently about a ALJ who had a very high rate of approvals and began to investigate him. Why are't they investigating this judge who is just the opposite in his decisions?
I had a hearing before Judge Wheeler, he was very nasty and rude. Showed no compassion and eventually dismissed my case. I wonder why the SSA isn't concerned about his high rate of dismissals and low approvals, his numbers are way out of line with the rest of W.LA office, state of CA and the nation as a whole. SSA seemed concerned recently about a ALJ who had a very high rate of approvals and began to investigate him. Why are't they investigating this judge who is just the opposite in his decisions?
I had a hearing before Judge Wheeler, he was very nasty and rude. Showed no compassion and eventually dismissed my case. I wonder why the SSA isn't concerned about his high rate of dismissals and low approvals, his numbers are way out of line with the rest of W.LA office, state of CA and the nation as a whole. SSA seemed concerned recently about a ALJ who had a very high rate of approvals and began to investigate him. Why are't they investigating this judge who is just the opposite in his decisions?
I agree with the previous comments about this ALJ. He actually brags about having cases dismissed and will tell the attorney/rep that he has no intention of paying the claim. He has already made his mind up about denying a claim prior to testimony even being taken.
I agree with the previous comments about this ALJ. He actually brags about having cases dismissed and will tell the attorney/rep that he has no intention of paying the claim. He has already made his mind up about denying a claim prior to testimony even being taken.
I agree with the previous comments about this ALJ. He actually brags about having cases dismissed and will tell the attorney/rep that he has no intention of paying the claim. He has already made his mind up about denying a claim prior to testimony even being taken.
Judge asked me and my colleagues to withdraw on just about every hearing we were scheduled. He would call us in early and tell us he was going to deny the claim....but it's up to us if we want to proceed....not a fair judge at all!!
Judge asked me and my colleagues to withdraw on just about every hearing we were scheduled. He would call us in early and tell us he was going to deny the claim....but it's up to us if we want to proceed....not a fair judge at all!!
Judge asked me and my colleagues to withdraw on just about every hearing we were scheduled. He would call us in early and tell us he was going to deny the claim....but it's up to us if we want to proceed....not a fair judge at all!!
Yes ALJ Wheeler is very bias. He tells you before the hearing that he has no intention of paying the claim, essentially indicating no matter what happens during the hearing he could care less. He fits in real good with ALJ Reason another bias ALJ.
Yes ALJ Wheeler is very bias. He tells you before the hearing that he has no intention of paying the claim, essentially indicating no matter what happens during the hearing he could care less. He fits in real good with ALJ Reason another bias ALJ.
Yes ALJ Wheeler is very bias. He tells you before the hearing that he has no intention of paying the claim, essentially indicating no matter what happens during the hearing he could care less. He fits in real good with ALJ Reason another bias ALJ.
A handsome Devil.
A handsome Devil.
A handsome Devil.
If you case happens to be assigned to Judge Wheeler, consider yourself one of the unluckiest people to ever file. This guy will not grant cases as apparent by his 26% approval rate. He basically has this scheme of strong arming attorneys into withdrawing their cases by basically stating no matter what he is going to deny the case. Don't even bother arguing, it useless, even if you do not withdraw and go forward, he will just bring in the client and make up some outrageous claim, during testimony, that the claimant is not credible, giving him further reason to deny, without considering the claimant's actual case.
If you case happens to be assigned to Judge Wheeler, consider yourself one of the unluckiest people to ever file. This guy will not grant cases as apparent by his 26% approval rate. He basically has this scheme of strong arming attorneys into withdrawing their cases by basically stating no matter what he is going to deny the case. Don't even bother arguing, it useless, even if you do not withdraw and go forward, he will just bring in the client and make up some outrageous claim, during testimony, that the claimant is not credible, giving him further reason to deny, without considering the claimant's actual case.
If you case happens to be assigned to Judge Wheeler, consider yourself one of the unluckiest people to ever file. This guy will not grant cases as apparent by his 26% approval rate. He basically has this scheme of strong arming attorneys into withdrawing their cases by basically stating no matter what he is going to deny the case. Don't even bother arguing, it useless, even if you do not withdraw and go forward, he will just bring in the client and make up some outrageous claim, during testimony, that the claimant is not credible, giving him further reason to deny, without considering the claimant's actual case.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Lawrence D. Wheeler, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Lawrence D. Wheeler, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
In this bleak, sad world, one prays for a sprinkling of moments that might uplift one's soul and fill one's heart with the hope of joy. For me, one of those moments is always when I discover that my hearing will be heard by the Honorable Judge Lawrence D. Wheeler, one of the kindest, wittiest, smartest and, dare I say, handsomest men this humble attorney has ever had the privilege of encountering.
As a witness I felt intimated, and badgered with not enough time to think a question through. The claimnet was told we need to speed this up I have other places to be today (this was a Friday late morning). Claimnet was not allowed to ask a question.If you do not understand the judges question then you shoul be able to ask a question so you can answer it properly. He said if I interupt the proceding again he would throw me out and it would be done. If I am not mistaken it is us the working people that pay him and he should have a obligation to listen to us and to read case files from begining to end instead of just zeroing in on one area and not look at the whole person and all their problems.
As a witness I felt intimated, and badgered with not enough time to think a question through. The claimnet was told we need to speed this up I have other places to be today (this was a Friday late morning). Claimnet was not allowed to ask a question.If you do not understand the judges question then you shoul be able to ask a question so you can answer it properly. He said if I interupt the proceding again he would throw me out and it would be done. If I am not mistaken it is us the working people that pay him and he should have a obligation to listen to us and to read case files from begining to end instead of just zeroing in on one area and not look at the whole person and all their problems.
As a witness I felt intimated, and badgered with not enough time to think a question through. The claimnet was told we need to speed this up I have other places to be today (this was a Friday late morning). Claimnet was not allowed to ask a question.If you do not understand the judges question then you shoul be able to ask a question so you can answer it properly. He said if I interupt the proceding again he would throw me out and it would be done. If I am not mistaken it is us the working people that pay him and he should have a obligation to listen to us and to read case files from begining to end instead of just zeroing in on one area and not look at the whole person and all their problems.
This judge is a joke and should be removed from the ALJ panel. He does not know, or does not understand the law, or the evidence. He tells the claimants BEFORE the hearing that he is going to deny the claim no matter what. Petty officials like like give government a bad name. I am not even sure he went to law school or is even a lawyer. God only knows how he got on the ALJ panel. He is doing a great disservice to the Social Security Administration and if putting the entire department in a very bad light.
This judge is a joke and should be removed from the ALJ panel. He does not know, or does not understand the law, or the evidence. He tells the claimants BEFORE the hearing that he is going to deny the claim no matter what. Petty officials like like give government a bad name. I am not even sure he went to law school or is even a lawyer. God only knows how he got on the ALJ panel. He is doing a great disservice to the Social Security Administration and if putting the entire department in a very bad light.
This judge is a joke and should be removed from the ALJ panel. He does not know, or does not understand the law, or the evidence. He tells the claimants BEFORE the hearing that he is going to deny the claim no matter what. Petty officials like like give government a bad name. I am not even sure he went to law school or is even a lawyer. God only knows how he got on the ALJ panel. He is doing a great disservice to the Social Security Administration and if putting the entire department in a very bad light.
Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. This individual is one of the most insulting, rude, and unreasonable people I have had the misery of meeting. If you are unfortunate enough to appear before this "hanging" judge, consider your case to be lost. You could be missing all of your limbs and he would suggest that you could serve as second base for a baseball league somewhere in the country. You may have to move to the other side of the country (since people applying for SSDI are known to be flush with money), but if there is a stamp somewhere in the country that needs licking and your tongue is capable of producing moisture-you are not disabled. Plain as day, right? There is no gray area, no extraneous circumstances or conditions with this man. If you are even remotely capable of operating a phone, you are ideally suited to be a telemarketer-and thus, clearly NOT disabled. More surgery coming up? Irrelevant. You at one time told your doctor that you were feeling even a little better, so therefore you ARE better and can find a job doing something somewhere. I would love to return to work (and have tried but was told that my restrictions could not be accommodated). So regardless of what he thinks you are qualified to do, good luck finding a company willing to take you on when you are "damaged goods". Once again, irrelevant. He is clearly trying to atone for all of the years when everyone was being approved by going in the complete opposite direction. My advice: First-do NOT get injured at work, you have no rights if that happens. Second-pray like hell that you do not end up in front of Lawrence Wheeler. Third-find a lawyer that knows what they are doing and is not simply there hoping to cash out with your case. I failed on all three counts.
Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. This individual is one of the most insulting, rude, and unreasonable people I have had the misery of meeting. If you are unfortunate enough to appear before this "hanging" judge, consider your case to be lost. You could be missing all of your limbs and he would suggest that you could serve as second base for a baseball league somewhere in the country. You may have to move to the other side of the country (since people applying for SSDI are known to be flush with money), but if there is a stamp somewhere in the country that needs licking and your tongue is capable of producing moisture-you are not disabled. Plain as day, right? There is no gray area, no extraneous circumstances or conditions with this man. If you are even remotely capable of operating a phone, you are ideally suited to be a telemarketer-and thus, clearly NOT disabled. More surgery coming up? Irrelevant. You at one time told your doctor that you were feeling even a little better, so therefore you ARE better and can find a job doing something somewhere. I would love to return to work (and have tried but was told that my restrictions could not be accommodated). So regardless of what he thinks you are qualified to do, good luck finding a company willing to take you on when you are "damaged goods". Once again, irrelevant. He is clearly trying to atone for all of the years when everyone was being approved by going in the complete opposite direction. My advice: First-do NOT get injured at work, you have no rights if that happens. Second-pray like hell that you do not end up in front of Lawrence Wheeler. Third-find a lawyer that knows what they are doing and is not simply there hoping to cash out with your case. I failed on all three counts.
Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. This individual is one of the most insulting, rude, and unreasonable people I have had the misery of meeting. If you are unfortunate enough to appear before this "hanging" judge, consider your case to be lost. You could be missing all of your limbs and he would suggest that you could serve as second base for a baseball league somewhere in the country. You may have to move to the other side of the country (since people applying for SSDI are known to be flush with money), but if there is a stamp somewhere in the country that needs licking and your tongue is capable of producing moisture-you are not disabled. Plain as day, right? There is no gray area, no extraneous circumstances or conditions with this man. If you are even remotely capable of operating a phone, you are ideally suited to be a telemarketer-and thus, clearly NOT disabled. More surgery coming up? Irrelevant. You at one time told your doctor that you were feeling even a little better, so therefore you ARE better and can find a job doing something somewhere. I would love to return to work (and have tried but was told that my restrictions could not be accommodated). So regardless of what he thinks you are qualified to do, good luck finding a company willing to take you on when you are "damaged goods". Once again, irrelevant. He is clearly trying to atone for all of the years when everyone was being approved by going in the complete opposite direction. My advice: First-do NOT get injured at work, you have no rights if that happens. Second-pray like hell that you do not end up in front of Lawrence Wheeler. Third-find a lawyer that knows what they are doing and is not simply there hoping to cash out with your case. I failed on all three counts.
The most ****** judge I've ever encounter he proudly states he's "saving money" to the U. S. A. by denying cases. Please investigate this "judge" -his rude, incompetent, nasty, awful personality, individual who is "judging" no more than a ******** enjoying his job. Get rid of him!
The most ****** judge I've ever encounter he proudly states he's "saving money" to the U. S. A. by denying cases. Please investigate this "judge" -his rude, incompetent, nasty, awful personality, individual who is "judging" no more than a ******** enjoying his job. Get rid of him!
The most ****** judge I've ever encounter he proudly states he's "saving money" to the U. S. A. by denying cases. Please investigate this "judge" -his rude, incompetent, nasty, awful personality, individual who is "judging" no more than a ******** enjoying his job. Get rid of him!
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
he's a ******.
he's a ******.
he's a ******.
Wisconsin judges were not fired so I have zero idea what your attorney is talking about. There is an office in Illinois that has taken some overflow and aged cases but that has n nothing to do with turnover.
Wisconsin judges were not fired so I have zero idea what your attorney is talking about. There is an office in Illinois that has taken some overflow and aged cases but that has n nothing to do with turnover.
Wisconsin judges were not fired so I have zero idea what your attorney is talking about. There is an office in Illinois that has taken some overflow and aged cases but that has n nothing to do with turnover.
Wheeler was aggitated prior to my hearing and acted as if he were a 5 year old pouting child. Worst judge on earth. Did not submit so much as one of my many medical records. He is a horrible dishonorable little man. Negative 10 stars.
Wheeler was aggitated prior to my hearing and acted as if he were a 5 year old pouting child. Worst judge on earth. Did not submit so much as one of my many medical records. He is a horrible dishonorable little man. Negative 10 stars.
Wheeler was aggitated prior to my hearing and acted as if he were a 5 year old pouting child. Worst judge on earth. Did not submit so much as one of my many medical records. He is a horrible dishonorable little man. Negative 10 stars.
I am very grateful for Judge Wheeler. I think he is fair, takes time to go over the evidence he is given and rules accordingly. My attorney was amazing though - she believed in my case and believed in me. She knew that I desperately needed SSI, as I am constantly in pain, as I suffer from RSD/CRPS, fibromyalgia, RA, chronic fatigue, Hep C, broke my pack twice, jumped by two men, beaten and kicked in the eye (now blind in that eye), hospitalized by a psycho ex bf, who broke 3 of my ribs, gave me 2 concussions, 2 contusions and stalked me (trauma resulting in ptsd) I've also been shot with a .38 which went through my left arm, through my side, through my liver, lung, diaphragm and lodged in my back 1/2 inch from my spine. I also attempted suicide a number of times, once I jumped off the roof of my 8 story apartment building, hit a tree on the way down, landed on my head, brain damaged and couldn't read or write for almost 3 years, among a number of other ailments. I had a hearing in 2012 without a lawyer and the judge then denied me. I believe I would have won if I had I a lawyer then, because a judge cannot decide in a clients favor just by what the client says - there must be written paperwork that shows the clients disability and according to what is required for the judge to decide in their favor. I am so grateful for my attorney, Barbara Tucker, as she worked her butt off to gather evidence (as well as myself, going to hospitals, doctors, etc. gathering paperwork/medical records) to bring before the judge. If someone wrre to just go by my physical appearance, they may not even think I'm disabled, but they don't see me when I'm behind closed doors, in pain, unable to do many of the just basics. It's probably silly (and pride) but I don't really like to appear disabled, but I am, and I am so terribly disappointed that I am unable to work, as I love to work, especially my 'art' - cutting hair. Anyway, I appreciate Judge Wheeler, I think he is fair and I believe that he took the time to go over all the evidence in my case, and that is why he judged in my favor.
I am very grateful for Judge Wheeler. I think he is fair, takes time to go over the evidence he is given and rules accordingly. My attorney was amazing though - she believed in my case and believed in me. She knew that I desperately needed SSI, as I am constantly in pain, as I suffer from RSD/CRPS, fibromyalgia, RA, chronic fatigue, Hep C, broke my pack twice, jumped by two men, beaten and kicked in the eye (now blind in that eye), hospitalized by a psycho ex bf, who broke 3 of my ribs, gave me 2 concussions, 2 contusions and stalked me (trauma resulting in ptsd) I've also been shot with a .38 which went through my left arm, through my side, through my liver, lung, diaphragm and lodged in my back 1/2 inch from my spine. I also attempted suicide a number of times, once I jumped off the roof of my 8 story apartment building, hit a tree on the way down, landed on my head, brain damaged and couldn't read or write for almost 3 years, among a number of other ailments. I had a hearing in 2012 without a lawyer and the judge then denied me. I believe I would have won if I had I a lawyer then, because a judge cannot decide in a clients favor just by what the client says - there must be written paperwork that shows the clients disability and according to what is required for the judge to decide in their favor. I am so grateful for my attorney, Barbara Tucker, as she worked her butt off to gather evidence (as well as myself, going to hospitals, doctors, etc. gathering paperwork/medical records) to bring before the judge. If someone wrre to just go by my physical appearance, they may not even think I'm disabled, but they don't see me when I'm behind closed doors, in pain, unable to do many of the just basics. It's probably silly (and pride) but I don't really like to appear disabled, but I am, and I am so terribly disappointed that I am unable to work, as I love to work, especially my 'art' - cutting hair. Anyway, I appreciate Judge Wheeler, I think he is fair and I believe that he took the time to go over all the evidence in my case, and that is why he judged in my favor.
I am very grateful for Judge Wheeler. I think he is fair, takes time to go over the evidence he is given and rules accordingly. My attorney was amazing though - she believed in my case and believed in me. She knew that I desperately needed SSI, as I am constantly in pain, as I suffer from RSD/CRPS, fibromyalgia, RA, chronic fatigue, Hep C, broke my pack twice, jumped by two men, beaten and kicked in the eye (now blind in that eye), hospitalized by a psycho ex bf, who broke 3 of my ribs, gave me 2 concussions, 2 contusions and stalked me (trauma resulting in ptsd) I've also been shot with a .38 which went through my left arm, through my side, through my liver, lung, diaphragm and lodged in my back 1/2 inch from my spine. I also attempted suicide a number of times, once I jumped off the roof of my 8 story apartment building, hit a tree on the way down, landed on my head, brain damaged and couldn't read or write for almost 3 years, among a number of other ailments. I had a hearing in 2012 without a lawyer and the judge then denied me. I believe I would have won if I had I a lawyer then, because a judge cannot decide in a clients favor just by what the client says - there must be written paperwork that shows the clients disability and according to what is required for the judge to decide in their favor. I am so grateful for my attorney, Barbara Tucker, as she worked her butt off to gather evidence (as well as myself, going to hospitals, doctors, etc. gathering paperwork/medical records) to bring before the judge. If someone wrre to just go by my physical appearance, they may not even think I'm disabled, but they don't see me when I'm behind closed doors, in pain, unable to do many of the just basics. It's probably silly (and pride) but I don't really like to appear disabled, but I am, and I am so terribly disappointed that I am unable to work, as I love to work, especially my 'art' - cutting hair. Anyway, I appreciate Judge Wheeler, I think he is fair and I believe that he took the time to go over all the evidence in my case, and that is why he judged in my favor.
I have had cancer that started up my anus just like Farrah Fossett and spread almost to my head , I am taking morphine and Prozac , from the minute I wake up to the minute I go to sleep .I don't know which way is up or down and your Honorable Judge Lawrence Wheeler , told me to go back to work . Have a great day y'all , you see I drive for a living I hope forgot sake I will not be driving through your neighborhood
I have had cancer that started up my anus just like Farrah Fossett and spread almost to my head , I am taking morphine and Prozac , from the minute I wake up to the minute I go to sleep .I don't know which way is up or down and your Honorable Judge Lawrence Wheeler , told me to go back to work . Have a great day y'all , you see I drive for a living I hope forgot sake I will not be driving through your neighborhood
I have had cancer that started up my anus just like Farrah Fossett and spread almost to my head , I am taking morphine and Prozac , from the minute I wake up to the minute I go to sleep .I don't know which way is up or down and your Honorable Judge Lawrence Wheeler , told me to go back to work . Have a great day y'all , you see I drive for a living I hope forgot sake I will not be driving through your neighborhood
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
Like!! Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
Like!! Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.
I always spent my half an hour to read this web site’s articles or reviews daily along with a mug of coffee.
I always spent my half an hour to read this web site’s articles or reviews daily along with a mug of coffee.