MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Minneapolis, MINNESOTA, 20 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Minneapolis, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 14 months. The average case processing time in Minneapolis is 508 days. The Minneapolis average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 41%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Minneapolis ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINNEAPOLIS | 20 | 14.0 months | 508 days | 2.2 | 18% | 41% | 41% |
| MINNESOTA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.00 months | 2.16 | 508 days | 3912 | 2630 | 1572 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 33
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Ross Wheatley | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| David B Washington | 52% | 14% | 34% |
| Dian Townsend-Anderson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sherry D Thompson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Charles J Thorbjornsen | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Richard Thrasher | 42% | 21% | 37% |
| Roger W Thomas | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Richard N Staples | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Raymond L Souza | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Timothy S Snelling | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Erin T Schmidt | 33% | 17% | 49% |
| Brian Saame | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John J Rabaut | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael D Quayle | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Micah Pharris | 37% | 17% | 46% |
| Leonard A Nelson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Larry Meuwissen | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Corinne T McLaughlin | 35% | 19% | 46% |
| Mary M Kunz | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Virginia Kuhn | 36% | 21% | 43% |
| Peter Kimball | 37% | 18% | 45% |
| Christopher R Inama | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Evangelina P Hernandez | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Daniel G Heely | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Jeffrey W Hart | 48% | 15% | 37% |
| Nicholas Grey | 34% | 24% | 42% |
| David K Gatto | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| George Gaffaney | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Peter C Erickson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| William G Brown | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Jerome J Berkowitz | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Corey Ayling | 49% | 15% | 37% |
| Stewart Alford | 0% | 0% | 0% |
471 Comments
After reading about the judge whom we be hearing my case after all these years i feel i have a good chance at my hearing i feel that judge alfor will be a partial in my case. Thank u
After reading about the judge whom we be hearing my case after all these years i feel i have a good chance at my hearing i feel that judge alfor will be a partial in my case. Thank u
After reading about the judge whom we be hearing my case after all these years i feel i have a good chance at my hearing i feel that judge alfor will be a partial in my case. Thank u
Unfair. In my opinion he judges based on how his "ego" feels about you.
Unfair. In my opinion he judges based on how his "ego" feels about you.
Unfair. In my opinion he judges based on how his "ego" feels about you.
I believe this judge was sufficient in his handling of my case. Very shocked to see he had a tattoo on his wrist, it was actually calming.
I believe this judge was sufficient in his handling of my case. Very shocked to see he had a tattoo on his wrist, it was actually calming.
I believe this judge was sufficient in his handling of my case. Very shocked to see he had a tattoo on his wrist, it was actually calming.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair judge. I felt he used my ailments against me. I also feel he goes by the "person" instead of the facts.
Unfair
Unfair
Unfair
Very fair,my impresion of him is that he listened and care a human judge with feelings and empathy.
Very fair,my impresion of him is that he listened and care a human judge with feelings and empathy.
Very fair,my impresion of him is that he listened and care a human judge with feelings and empathy.
viagra buying viagra online no prescription viagra
viagra buying viagra online no prescription viagra
Thoughtful, thorough, fair, and truly a humanist.
Thoughtful, thorough, fair, and truly a humanist.
Thoughtful, thorough, fair, and truly a humanist.
No clue if I got approved yet. I was so scared I was just about jumping out of my skin the whole time I was in there, but he never once made me uncomfortable. I thought in this type of hearing the judges would treat you like a criminal or a fraud looking for a handout but this was NOT the case with Judge Brown and I'm very grateful I went in front of him. Very kind and empathetic judge.
No clue if I got approved yet. I was so scared I was just about jumping out of my skin the whole time I was in there, but he never once made me uncomfortable. I thought in this type of hearing the judges would treat you like a criminal or a fraud looking for a handout but this was NOT the case with Judge Brown and I'm very grateful I went in front of him. Very kind and empathetic judge.
No clue if I got approved yet. I was so scared I was just about jumping out of my skin the whole time I was in there, but he never once made me uncomfortable. I thought in this type of hearing the judges would treat you like a criminal or a fraud looking for a handout but this was NOT the case with Judge Brown and I'm very grateful I went in front of him. Very kind and empathetic judge.
I was scared to death, but Judge Brown was very kind. He is the strong silent type who can read you, so above all else BE HONEST, if you are not this judge will see right through it. My hearing lasted less then 30 minutes, but a lot of information was covered during the time. I'm relieved to be done with court, and am thankful that this judge was very fair, and kind!
I was scared to death, but Judge Brown was very kind. He is the strong silent type who can read you, so above all else BE HONEST, if you are not this judge will see right through it. My hearing lasted less then 30 minutes, but a lot of information was covered during the time. I'm relieved to be done with court, and am thankful that this judge was very fair, and kind!
I was scared to death, but Judge Brown was very kind. He is the strong silent type who can read you, so above all else BE HONEST, if you are not this judge will see right through it. My hearing lasted less then 30 minutes, but a lot of information was covered during the time. I'm relieved to be done with court, and am thankful that this judge was very fair, and kind!
I was so scared about speaking in front of anyone, but the atmosphere in Judge Brown court was pleasant and straight to the points. I really liked the way he handle the procedures (straight to the point).
I was so scared about speaking in front of anyone, but the atmosphere in Judge Brown court was pleasant and straight to the points. I really liked the way he handle the procedures (straight to the point).
I was so scared about speaking in front of anyone, but the atmosphere in Judge Brown court was pleasant and straight to the points. I really liked the way he handle the procedures (straight to the point).
I was scared when being in the present of the Judge William G Brown. He was kind and made it a Little more comfortable then scary I Thank him for taking the time to hear my case and being fair About his decision.
I was scared when being in the present of the Judge William G Brown. He was kind and made it a Little more comfortable then scary I Thank him for taking the time to hear my case and being fair About his decision.
I was scared when being in the present of the Judge William G Brown. He was kind and made it a Little more comfortable then scary I Thank him for taking the time to hear my case and being fair About his decision.
I was scared and super nervous about my hearing, but Judge William Brown seemed very kind. I take a medication to keep fluid out of my ear, my side effects are that I am always thirsty all of the time. I felt distracted as my mouth was so dry, that it was hard to talk. My attorney arrived 15 minutes prior to the hearing, I also felt not prepared on what type of questions I would be asked, due to not having much time to prepare. I am glad my case is done and I look forward to seeing the outcome from Judge William Brown's decision.
I was scared and super nervous about my hearing, but Judge William Brown seemed very kind. I take a medication to keep fluid out of my ear, my side effects are that I am always thirsty all of the time. I felt distracted as my mouth was so dry, that it was hard to talk. My attorney arrived 15 minutes prior to the hearing, I also felt not prepared on what type of questions I would be asked, due to not having much time to prepare. I am glad my case is done and I look forward to seeing the outcome from Judge William Brown's decision.
I was scared and super nervous about my hearing, but Judge William Brown seemed very kind. I take a medication to keep fluid out of my ear, my side effects are that I am always thirsty all of the time. I felt distracted as my mouth was so dry, that it was hard to talk. My attorney arrived 15 minutes prior to the hearing, I also felt not prepared on what type of questions I would be asked, due to not having much time to prepare. I am glad my case is done and I look forward to seeing the outcome from Judge William Brown's decision.
I am a 100% disabled vet. I was denied on my 1st appeal by Judge Thomas who was rude. Judge Brown was the total opposite, he had a straight to business no nonsense style but yet took the time to let you talk freally and listen to you. He will look you in the eye wich I really liked, Judge Brown is good to go in my book thank you Sir.
I am a 100% disabled vet. I was denied on my 1st appeal by Judge Thomas who was rude. Judge Brown was the total opposite, he had a straight to business no nonsense style but yet took the time to let you talk freally and listen to you. He will look you in the eye wich I really liked, Judge Brown is good to go in my book thank you Sir.
I am a 100% disabled vet. I was denied on my 1st appeal by Judge Thomas who was rude. Judge Brown was the total opposite, he had a straight to business no nonsense style but yet took the time to let you talk freally and listen to you. He will look you in the eye wich I really liked, Judge Brown is good to go in my book thank you Sir.
My experience with Judge Brown was very positive. He seems to be empathetic and a very good listener. He treated me with respect and dignity.
My experience with Judge Brown was very positive. He seems to be empathetic and a very good listener. He treated me with respect and dignity.
My experience with Judge Brown was very positive. He seems to be empathetic and a very good listener. He treated me with respect and dignity.
Judge William Brown is an excellent judge! He is fair and very compassionate. I was very nervous and in much pain but he put me at ease. He is a brilliant man and made me feel as comfortable as he could. In the end he issued my decision from the bench. This made me very happy. I fought for so long but in the end a fair and caring man made the right decision for me. I thank and salute you sir!
Judge William Brown is an excellent judge! He is fair and very compassionate. I was very nervous and in much pain but he put me at ease. He is a brilliant man and made me feel as comfortable as he could. In the end he issued my decision from the bench. This made me very happy. I fought for so long but in the end a fair and caring man made the right decision for me. I thank and salute you sir!
Judge William Brown is an excellent judge! He is fair and very compassionate. I was very nervous and in much pain but he put me at ease. He is a brilliant man and made me feel as comfortable as he could. In the end he issued my decision from the bench. This made me very happy. I fought for so long but in the end a fair and caring man made the right decision for me. I thank and salute you sir!
I recently had a hearing in front of Judge Brown. I was extremely nervous and waited a long time for that day. Judge Brown couldn't have been more understanding. He was very understanding and compassionate. I wish I could have shook his hand.
I recently had a hearing in front of Judge Brown. I was extremely nervous and waited a long time for that day. Judge Brown couldn't have been more understanding. He was very understanding and compassionate. I wish I could have shook his hand.
I recently had a hearing in front of Judge Brown. I was extremely nervous and waited a long time for that day. Judge Brown couldn't have been more understanding. He was very understanding and compassionate. I wish I could have shook his hand.
No clue if I was approved I was in a lot a pain Nov 6 2018 I was grateful to meet Judge Brown very kind and empathic I've rare condition mast cell activation environmental condition) slash all this not fun lymphedema, idiopathic chronic hives, I've intolerance to food allergies to medications I'm taking compound capsule from mayo pharmacy mailed from Rochaster Mn medication not in the US it's hard to get treatment with a invisible chronic illness I choose to keep fighting for rare god created me in his imagine I'm unique disability comes in all forms who would think I watched the movie the boy in the bobble then to think the whole time that is my life God is faithful
No clue if I was approved I was in a lot a pain Nov 6 2018 I was grateful to meet Judge Brown very kind and empathic I've rare condition mast cell activation environmental condition) slash all this not fun lymphedema, idiopathic chronic hives, I've intolerance to food allergies to medications I'm taking compound capsule from mayo pharmacy mailed from Rochaster Mn medication not in the US it's hard to get treatment with a invisible chronic illness I choose to keep fighting for rare god created me in his imagine I'm unique disability comes in all forms who would think I watched the movie the boy in the bobble then to think the whole time that is my life God is faithful
No clue if I was approved I was in a lot a pain Nov 6 2018 I was grateful to meet Judge Brown very kind and empathic I've rare condition mast cell activation environmental condition) slash all this not fun lymphedema, idiopathic chronic hives, I've intolerance to food allergies to medications I'm taking compound capsule from mayo pharmacy mailed from Rochaster Mn medication not in the US it's hard to get treatment with a invisible chronic illness I choose to keep fighting for rare god created me in his imagine I'm unique disability comes in all forms who would think I watched the movie the boy in the bobble then to think the whole time that is my life God is faithful
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
This man should be admonished. Taken off the bench. I appeared before him as a 100% disabled veteran to request SSI and he denied me. then told me to file a claim against the Veterans Affairs office. This was a side bar right after the hearing. He made it clear he had worked for the Veterans Affairs prior to this current job at the Social Security Administration. He put information in my file that was not even related to the case, and had no bearing on my disability request. He is still serving in the military at Fort Snelling, Minnesota. I feel he has no conscience and does not even care about his fellow military service members in need of help.
This man should be admonished. Taken off the bench. I appeared before him as a 100% disabled veteran to request SSI and he denied me. then told me to file a claim against the Veterans Affairs office. This was a side bar right after the hearing. He made it clear he had worked for the Veterans Affairs prior to this current job at the Social Security Administration. He put information in my file that was not even related to the case, and had no bearing on my disability request. He is still serving in the military at Fort Snelling, Minnesota. I feel he has no conscience and does not even care about his fellow military service members in need of help.
This man should be admonished. Taken off the bench. I appeared before him as a 100% disabled veteran to request SSI and he denied me. then told me to file a claim against the Veterans Affairs office. This was a side bar right after the hearing. He made it clear he had worked for the Veterans Affairs prior to this current job at the Social Security Administration. He put information in my file that was not even related to the case, and had no bearing on my disability request. He is still serving in the military at Fort Snelling, Minnesota. I feel he has no conscience and does not even care about his fellow military service members in need of help.
I find it extremely ironic that first a ssd ssdi examiner disregards my application and diagnosis because I was able to get assistance collecting my doctors records and writing a description of how the illness affects my life Therefore, I don't qualify for a 12.0 listing (mental illness) because Mary X. Sullivan Phd insight into my illness and decided I was too organized and able to do this so I was denied for the second time. Then Administrative Law Judge Mr. James W. Hart, can review a record of someone in dire need of help to not get evicted, who has tried to work with a mental illness unsuccessfully for over 30 years that causes extreme mood swings, anxiety attacks, debilitating depression and memory loss can state that there isn't enough "consistency " in medical records of over 10 years of thourough documentation that dictates my inbility to not be consistent with my jobs with my numerous mental illness diagnosis backed by numerous doctors over the years. Does Mr. Hart HAVE ANY idea about the symptoms and detrimental symptoms of being mentally ill?
I find it extremely ironic that first a ssd ssdi examiner disregards my application and diagnosis because I was able to get assistance collecting my doctors records and writing a description of how the illness affects my life Therefore, I don't qualify for a 12.0 listing (mental illness) because Mary X. Sullivan Phd insight into my illness and decided I was too organized and able to do this so I was denied for the second time. Then Administrative Law Judge Mr. James W. Hart, can review a record of someone in dire need of help to not get evicted, who has tried to work with a mental illness unsuccessfully for over 30 years that causes extreme mood swings, anxiety attacks, debilitating depression and memory loss can state that there isn't enough "consistency " in medical records of over 10 years of thourough documentation that dictates my inbility to not be consistent with my jobs with my numerous mental illness diagnosis backed by numerous doctors over the years. Does Mr. Hart HAVE ANY idea about the symptoms and detrimental symptoms of being mentally ill?
I find it extremely ironic that first a ssd ssdi examiner disregards my application and diagnosis because I was able to get assistance collecting my doctors records and writing a description of how the illness affects my life Therefore, I don't qualify for a 12.0 listing (mental illness) because Mary X. Sullivan Phd insight into my illness and decided I was too organized and able to do this so I was denied for the second time. Then Administrative Law Judge Mr. James W. Hart, can review a record of someone in dire need of help to not get evicted, who has tried to work with a mental illness unsuccessfully for over 30 years that causes extreme mood swings, anxiety attacks, debilitating depression and memory loss can state that there isn't enough "consistency " in medical records of over 10 years of thourough documentation that dictates my inbility to not be consistent with my jobs with my numerous mental illness diagnosis backed by numerous doctors over the years. Does Mr. Hart HAVE ANY idea about the symptoms and detrimental symptoms of being mentally ill?
Very unfair. I had a job in my file that I never worked in life. Wasn't at all pleased with the outcome of my case.
Very unfair. I had a job in my file that I never worked in life. Wasn't at all pleased with the outcome of my case.
Very unfair. I had a job in my file that I never worked in life. Wasn't at all pleased with the outcome of my case.
Excellent Judge, very fair and kind. Considers all facts of the case and obviously spends a lot of time on each case.
Excellent Judge, very fair and kind. Considers all facts of the case and obviously spends a lot of time on each case.
Excellent Judge, very fair and kind. Considers all facts of the case and obviously spends a lot of time on each case.
cvs viagra viagra for sale when will viagra be generic
cvs viagra viagra for sale when will viagra be generic
Judge Heely is great. Fast, efficient and polite.
Judge Heely is great. Fast, efficient and polite.
Judge Heely is great. Fast, efficient and polite.
He was a very fair judge
He was a very fair judge
He was a very fair judge
I suffer from severe panick attacks, PTSD, Anxiety, and depression and my case was denied. Can I get something from him when I go out looking for a job that says "this person can't be fired for taking unscheduled breaks when she is having a severe panick attacks that feel like a heart attack etc.. and this person can't be fired for missing days from work for having to take days off when they get really bad" I am extremely disappointed. I know a few drug addicts on disability how can they get it so they can keep getting high but I am struggling with several things here and I can't?
I suffer from severe panick attacks, PTSD, Anxiety, and depression and my case was denied. Can I get something from him when I go out looking for a job that says "this person can't be fired for taking unscheduled breaks when she is having a severe panick attacks that feel like a heart attack etc.. and this person can't be fired for missing days from work for having to take days off when they get really bad" I am extremely disappointed. I know a few drug addicts on disability how can they get it so they can keep getting high but I am struggling with several things here and I can't?
I suffer from severe panick attacks, PTSD, Anxiety, and depression and my case was denied. Can I get something from him when I go out looking for a job that says "this person can't be fired for taking unscheduled breaks when she is having a severe panick attacks that feel like a heart attack etc.. and this person can't be fired for missing days from work for having to take days off when they get really bad" I am extremely disappointed. I know a few drug addicts on disability how can they get it so they can keep getting high but I am struggling with several things here and I can't?
No decision yet but, judge heely was polite, friendly, and professional. I felt relaxed and comfortable, considering my future will strongly be affected by his decision. Its in Gods hands now. Overall good experience.
No decision yet but, judge heely was polite, friendly, and professional. I felt relaxed and comfortable, considering my future will strongly be affected by his decision. Its in Gods hands now. Overall good experience.
No decision yet but, judge heely was polite, friendly, and professional. I felt relaxed and comfortable, considering my future will strongly be affected by his decision. Its in Gods hands now. Overall good experience.
ALJ Daniel G Heely At first I thought he would be fair but he turned out to be a polished turd, I had the best attorney in the valley Jeffrey Milam, I've suffered a lot of abuse emotionally mentally, psychologically, and spiritually, I was diagnosed add as a kid this episode in my life has traumatized me, I have severe panic attacks ptsd, my drs therapist s have documented that I'm not able to work, he I worked some but not steadily how am I supposed to survive while waiting you want me an my daughter to be homeless SOB. I appealed the decision because you sir are so wrong, I hope to God the appeals counsel doesn't have you 're review it again so you can deny me again. I will present documents that I still suffer what I suffer, since most likely the cases you approve are ex con dopefiends, drunks and felons hope you get yours@$&& thrown off the bench like Bonnie H said she told the canned truth you are anything but impartial as well as your vocational experts Go screw yourself I don't no how-to conduct myself in court people like you have done harm to honest law abiding citizens like me, it states in the nolo law on social security if you worked no more than three months it won't hurt you such effing hypocrites you are
ALJ Daniel G Heely At first I thought he would be fair but he turned out to be a polished turd, I had the best attorney in the valley Jeffrey Milam, I've suffered a lot of abuse emotionally mentally, psychologically, and spiritually, I was diagnosed add as a kid this episode in my life has traumatized me, I have severe panic attacks ptsd, my drs therapist s have documented that I'm not able to work, he I worked some but not steadily how am I supposed to survive while waiting you want me an my daughter to be homeless SOB. I appealed the decision because you sir are so wrong, I hope to God the appeals counsel doesn't have you 're review it again so you can deny me again. I will present documents that I still suffer what I suffer, since most likely the cases you approve are ex con dopefiends, drunks and felons hope you get yours@$&& thrown off the bench like Bonnie H said she told the canned truth you are anything but impartial as well as your vocational experts Go screw yourself I don't no how-to conduct myself in court people like you have done harm to honest law abiding citizens like me, it states in the nolo law on social security if you worked no more than three months it won't hurt you such effing hypocrites you are
ALJ Daniel G Heely At first I thought he would be fair but he turned out to be a polished turd, I had the best attorney in the valley Jeffrey Milam, I've suffered a lot of abuse emotionally mentally, psychologically, and spiritually, I was diagnosed add as a kid this episode in my life has traumatized me, I have severe panic attacks ptsd, my drs therapist s have documented that I'm not able to work, he I worked some but not steadily how am I supposed to survive while waiting you want me an my daughter to be homeless SOB. I appealed the decision because you sir are so wrong, I hope to God the appeals counsel doesn't have you 're review it again so you can deny me again. I will present documents that I still suffer what I suffer, since most likely the cases you approve are ex con dopefiends, drunks and felons hope you get yours@$&& thrown off the bench like Bonnie H said she told the canned truth you are anything but impartial as well as your vocational experts Go screw yourself I don't no how-to conduct myself in court people like you have done harm to honest law abiding citizens like me, it states in the nolo law on social security if you worked no more than three months it won't hurt you such effing hypocrites you are
He s a anything but impartial , now my own attorney will not take my letter of disagreement of unfavorable decision to appeals counsel What wrong with this picture , I feel stabbed in he back . He at I'm disabled why more proof do I freaking need . I. Disgusted did I say wrong thing to you or what ????????????
He s a anything but impartial , now my own attorney will not take my letter of disagreement of unfavorable decision to appeals counsel What wrong with this picture , I feel stabbed in he back . He at I'm disabled why more proof do I freaking need . I. Disgusted did I say wrong thing to you or what ????????????
He s a anything but impartial , now my own attorney will not take my letter of disagreement of unfavorable decision to appeals counsel What wrong with this picture , I feel stabbed in he back . He at I'm disabled why more proof do I freaking need . I. Disgusted did I say wrong thing to you or what ????????????
Melody,Perez I don't know you but ALJ Daniel G Heely is anything but he was not impartial at all, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing,
Melody,Perez I don't know you but ALJ Daniel G Heely is anything but he was not impartial at all, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing,
Melody,Perez I don't know you but ALJ Daniel G Heely is anything but he was not impartial at all, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing,
I had my hearing today and no matter what people think, Judge Heely does a thorough job. I can't remember the recorders name but she was very pleasant as well. Judge Heely was great, especially when I forgot questions while answering or if my comprehension of what was being asked was incorrect and I didn't answer right. Thank you for having patients with me sir. Now I'm wiped out but I am glad I had the chance after 2 1/2 years to finally be heard.
I had my hearing today and no matter what people think, Judge Heely does a thorough job. I can't remember the recorders name but she was very pleasant as well. Judge Heely was great, especially when I forgot questions while answering or if my comprehension of what was being asked was incorrect and I didn't answer right. Thank you for having patients with me sir. Now I'm wiped out but I am glad I had the chance after 2 1/2 years to finally be heard.
I had my hearing today and no matter what people think, Judge Heely does a thorough job. I can't remember the recorders name but she was very pleasant as well. Judge Heely was great, especially when I forgot questions while answering or if my comprehension of what was being asked was incorrect and I didn't answer right. Thank you for having patients with me sir. Now I'm wiped out but I am glad I had the chance after 2 1/2 years to finally be heard.
I guess in a way I understand why they are so strict and so many people get denied. I know someone who is faking Lupus to get disability. This person was told by several Dr. That she doesn't have it. She found a new Dr. That decided to take her word for it and this person is telling people how miserable her life is and can't move or walk etc... you will find her partying Monday thru Sunday. However this person is extremely lucky so she might actually get away with it and fool the Judges unless they only focus on lab work etc..
I guess in a way I understand why they are so strict and so many people get denied. I know someone who is faking Lupus to get disability. This person was told by several Dr. That she doesn't have it. She found a new Dr. That decided to take her word for it and this person is telling people how miserable her life is and can't move or walk etc... you will find her partying Monday thru Sunday. However this person is extremely lucky so she might actually get away with it and fool the Judges unless they only focus on lab work etc..
I guess in a way I understand why they are so strict and so many people get denied. I know someone who is faking Lupus to get disability. This person was told by several Dr. That she doesn't have it. She found a new Dr. That decided to take her word for it and this person is telling people how miserable her life is and can't move or walk etc... you will find her partying Monday thru Sunday. However this person is extremely lucky so she might actually get away with it and fool the Judges unless they only focus on lab work etc..
Made a mistake on my case. He was not very good at looking at everything.
Made a mistake on my case. He was not very good at looking at everything.
Made a mistake on my case. He was not very good at looking at everything.
Had my hearing on July 9, 2018. This judge was very thorough explained everything very well as i did not have representation. Still waiting on decision was told 6-12 months which i feel is outrageous but i still think he is a fair judge and was sympathetic to my disability
Had my hearing on July 9, 2018. This judge was very thorough explained everything very well as i did not have representation. Still waiting on decision was told 6-12 months which i feel is outrageous but i still think he is a fair judge and was sympathetic to my disability
Had my hearing on July 9, 2018. This judge was very thorough explained everything very well as i did not have representation. Still waiting on decision was told 6-12 months which i feel is outrageous but i still think he is a fair judge and was sympathetic to my disability
There are no other family court judge Daniel HEALY RESIDENCE KAILUA, MY NAME IS WENDELL IGNACIO LIVED NEXT DOOR 640 AUWAI ST. THIS IS THE JUDGE DANIEL HEALY I SPEAK OF, THAT WENT OUT OF HIS WAY TO KIDNAPP MYSELF ADMINISTER NARCOTICS AGAINST MY KNOWLEDGE & WILL INTEROGATING ME ABOUT CHARLES MARSLANDS SON MURDER ILLEGALY
There are no other family court judge Daniel HEALY RESIDENCE KAILUA, MY NAME IS WENDELL IGNACIO LIVED NEXT DOOR 640 AUWAI ST. THIS IS THE JUDGE DANIEL HEALY I SPEAK OF, THAT WENT OUT OF HIS WAY TO KIDNAPP MYSELF ADMINISTER NARCOTICS AGAINST MY KNOWLEDGE & WILL INTEROGATING ME ABOUT CHARLES MARSLANDS SON MURDER ILLEGALY
There are no other family court judge Daniel HEALY RESIDENCE KAILUA, MY NAME IS WENDELL IGNACIO LIVED NEXT DOOR 640 AUWAI ST. THIS IS THE JUDGE DANIEL HEALY I SPEAK OF, THAT WENT OUT OF HIS WAY TO KIDNAPP MYSELF ADMINISTER NARCOTICS AGAINST MY KNOWLEDGE & WILL INTEROGATING ME ABOUT CHARLES MARSLANDS SON MURDER ILLEGALY
Hi recently had a hearing that was proceeded over by judge Hernandez. The hearing was October 22nd. and I was a nervous wreck to say the least. We were taken in about 20 minutes early as I'm assuming she was running ahead of schedule. I felt that she was a straight shooter and really wanted to get to root of what it is that has caused me to no longer be able to work. She did ask some questions that I wish I would have been able to go into a little deeper, but when your world has been turned upside down in a matter of a few years it's hard to get it all in with out rambling and my attorney made sure to roll right on to the next question. For me I guess it will come down to wether or not she values the opinion of my phycisian and realizes what a life altering experience this has been for me. She seemed to be genuine and fair, although very difficult to read. It's in god's hands now. I continue to pray that this emotional journey is finally over and that I will be able to focus on my health and my son. Now the waiting for that letter that I don't know if I have the strength to open.
Hi recently had a hearing that was proceeded over by judge Hernandez. The hearing was October 22nd. and I was a nervous wreck to say the least. We were taken in about 20 minutes early as I'm assuming she was running ahead of schedule. I felt that she was a straight shooter and really wanted to get to root of what it is that has caused me to no longer be able to work. She did ask some questions that I wish I would have been able to go into a little deeper, but when your world has been turned upside down in a matter of a few years it's hard to get it all in with out rambling and my attorney made sure to roll right on to the next question. For me I guess it will come down to wether or not she values the opinion of my phycisian and realizes what a life altering experience this has been for me. She seemed to be genuine and fair, although very difficult to read. It's in god's hands now. I continue to pray that this emotional journey is finally over and that I will be able to focus on my health and my son. Now the waiting for that letter that I don't know if I have the strength to open.
Hi recently had a hearing that was proceeded over by judge Hernandez. The hearing was October 22nd. and I was a nervous wreck to say the least. We were taken in about 20 minutes early as I'm assuming she was running ahead of schedule. I felt that she was a straight shooter and really wanted to get to root of what it is that has caused me to no longer be able to work. She did ask some questions that I wish I would have been able to go into a little deeper, but when your world has been turned upside down in a matter of a few years it's hard to get it all in with out rambling and my attorney made sure to roll right on to the next question. For me I guess it will come down to wether or not she values the opinion of my phycisian and realizes what a life altering experience this has been for me. She seemed to be genuine and fair, although very difficult to read. It's in god's hands now. I continue to pray that this emotional journey is finally over and that I will be able to focus on my health and my son. Now the waiting for that letter that I don't know if I have the strength to open.
Represented a client before this judge and received the most scathing denial. The judge acted like she was in dire need of meds herself she called my client a liar and called all her doctors liars. She cherry picked the stoppage of any prescriptions not that they were replaced by another. She just wrote the most scathing and blistering report. I find it horrible because the client is the most honest person I know and didn't deserve a disservice such as this.
Represented a client before this judge and received the most scathing denial. The judge acted like she was in dire need of meds herself she called my client a liar and called all her doctors liars. She cherry picked the stoppage of any prescriptions not that they were replaced by another. She just wrote the most scathing and blistering report. I find it horrible because the client is the most honest person I know and didn't deserve a disservice such as this.
Represented a client before this judge and received the most scathing denial. The judge acted like she was in dire need of meds herself she called my client a liar and called all her doctors liars. She cherry picked the stoppage of any prescriptions not that they were replaced by another. She just wrote the most scathing and blistering report. I find it horrible because the client is the most honest person I know and didn't deserve a disservice such as this.
Excellent judge. Fair and thorough. Helps put claimants at ease.
Excellent judge. Fair and thorough. Helps put claimants at ease.
Excellent judge. Fair and thorough. Helps put claimants at ease.
Judge is perfect at her job listens to your testimony without discrimination of character takes the time to fully understand your medical issue and evidence provided very pleasant and respectful they could not have appointed a better person for this job thank you for your fairness!
Judge is perfect at her job listens to your testimony without discrimination of character takes the time to fully understand your medical issue and evidence provided very pleasant and respectful they could not have appointed a better person for this job thank you for your fairness!
Judge is perfect at her job listens to your testimony without discrimination of character takes the time to fully understand your medical issue and evidence provided very pleasant and respectful they could not have appointed a better person for this job thank you for your fairness!
Hon.E.Hernandez. Her body language,way she sat,appropriate eye contact & words used,tone,facial expression,calm assertiveness were consistent,Hence, my perception; Judge was not prejudiced bias or angry but patient in control.Hon. E. Hernandez omits power,without abusing it. "Her performance in official capacity, "Brings Honor to title Judge".
Hon.E.Hernandez. Her body language,way she sat,appropriate eye contact & words used,tone,facial expression,calm assertiveness were consistent,Hence, my perception; Judge was not prejudiced bias or angry but patient in control.Hon. E. Hernandez omits power,without abusing it. "Her performance in official capacity, "Brings Honor to title Judge".
Hon.E.Hernandez. Her body language,way she sat,appropriate eye contact & words used,tone,facial expression,calm assertiveness were consistent,Hence, my perception; Judge was not prejudiced bias or angry but patient in control.Hon. E. Hernandez omits power,without abusing it. "Her performance in official capacity, "Brings Honor to title Judge".
This judge is not looking for truth. He has other priorities.Race and nationality matter to him a lot.
This judge is not looking for truth. He has other priorities.Race and nationality matter to him a lot.
This judge is not looking for truth. He has other priorities.Race and nationality matter to him a lot.
I forgot to say that he looks for the legal ways to deny. Don't be fooled by the way he treats you.
I forgot to say that he looks for the legal ways to deny. Don't be fooled by the way he treats you.
I forgot to say that he looks for the legal ways to deny. Don't be fooled by the way he treats you.
I suspect Judge Inama takes a certain pleasure in finding ways to deny people. I felt some disdain coming from him during my hearing; it was rather degrading. I paid into the system for 20+ years now I am making a legitimate claim against that pool of money because of a brutal illness, and he denies me, based on specious and sketchy reasoning.
I suspect Judge Inama takes a certain pleasure in finding ways to deny people. I felt some disdain coming from him during my hearing; it was rather degrading. I paid into the system for 20+ years now I am making a legitimate claim against that pool of money because of a brutal illness, and he denies me, based on specious and sketchy reasoning.
I suspect Judge Inama takes a certain pleasure in finding ways to deny people. I felt some disdain coming from him during my hearing; it was rather degrading. I paid into the system for 20+ years now I am making a legitimate claim against that pool of money because of a brutal illness, and he denies me, based on specious and sketchy reasoning.
I felt some sort of disdain and contempt coming from Judge Inama at my hearing. I think he wanted to deny me and then set about finding a way to do so. I paid into the system for 20+ years and now I am making a legitimate claim, and he denies me. The system failed, and this judge failed. Disgusted.
I felt some sort of disdain and contempt coming from Judge Inama at my hearing. I think he wanted to deny me and then set about finding a way to do so. I paid into the system for 20+ years and now I am making a legitimate claim, and he denies me. The system failed, and this judge failed. Disgusted.
I felt some sort of disdain and contempt coming from Judge Inama at my hearing. I think he wanted to deny me and then set about finding a way to do so. I paid into the system for 20+ years and now I am making a legitimate claim, and he denies me. The system failed, and this judge failed. Disgusted.
I felt that Judge Inama was annoyed at the prospect of even having to hear my case. He looks for any reason to deny benefits and I felt his disgust towards me the whole time I was in front of him. He has no business being in this position of holding people's livelihood in his hands!
I felt that Judge Inama was annoyed at the prospect of even having to hear my case. He looks for any reason to deny benefits and I felt his disgust towards me the whole time I was in front of him. He has no business being in this position of holding people's livelihood in his hands!
I felt that Judge Inama was annoyed at the prospect of even having to hear my case. He looks for any reason to deny benefits and I felt his disgust towards me the whole time I was in front of him. He has no business being in this position of holding people's livelihood in his hands!
Too bad there isn't a rating lower than one or I would give this Obama Ass Clown that rating.
Too bad there isn't a rating lower than one or I would give this Obama Ass Clown that rating.
Too bad there isn't a rating lower than one or I would give this Obama Ass Clown that rating.
He is a horrible heartless judge. He basically said I lied about my sons conditions. I brought in more supporting documents and they were never put into my child's file.
He is a horrible heartless judge. He basically said I lied about my sons conditions. I brought in more supporting documents and they were never put into my child's file.
He is a horrible heartless judge. He basically said I lied about my sons conditions. I brought in more supporting documents and they were never put into my child's file.
Terrible! Denied after being unable to work for 4 years, medical and mental health issues. The only reason his decision was overturned and now going to federal court was because he failed to consider certain evidence that was pertinent to the case. He has pre-determined biases about certain conditions.
Terrible! Denied after being unable to work for 4 years, medical and mental health issues. The only reason his decision was overturned and now going to federal court was because he failed to consider certain evidence that was pertinent to the case. He has pre-determined biases about certain conditions.
Terrible! Denied after being unable to work for 4 years, medical and mental health issues. The only reason his decision was overturned and now going to federal court was because he failed to consider certain evidence that was pertinent to the case. He has pre-determined biases about certain conditions.
I just had my hearing and i really felt like the judge was very professional and was very fair with the questions he asked. I went there and told the truth about my health conditions and why im unable to work and i had very good medical records and statements from my treating doctors and there was a vocational expert by phone. I really think everything went good now i need to wait for the decision in the mail. Just go in and tell the truth i thought he was a very nice judge. Thank you
I just had my hearing and i really felt like the judge was very professional and was very fair with the questions he asked. I went there and told the truth about my health conditions and why im unable to work and i had very good medical records and statements from my treating doctors and there was a vocational expert by phone. I really think everything went good now i need to wait for the decision in the mail. Just go in and tell the truth i thought he was a very nice judge. Thank you
I just had my hearing and i really felt like the judge was very professional and was very fair with the questions he asked. I went there and told the truth about my health conditions and why im unable to work and i had very good medical records and statements from my treating doctors and there was a vocational expert by phone. I really think everything went good now i need to wait for the decision in the mail. Just go in and tell the truth i thought he was a very nice judge. Thank you
This the judge this denying my right to in person hearing based on bias. I plan to file a complete complaint.
This the judge this denying my right to in person hearing based on bias. I plan to file a complete complaint.
This the judge this denying my right to in person hearing based on bias. I plan to file a complete complaint.
Malicious evil bitch. Wonder what online outfit gave her her "degree"
Malicious evil bitch. Wonder what online outfit gave her her "degree"
Malicious evil bitch. Wonder what online outfit gave her her "degree"
This judge is Prejudice she has denied me more than once after the people in the courtroom with her said there is nothing that I can do because of my disabilities she chooses to do this to me because she thinks that I'm an alcoholic the fact that she has no idea anything about my life doesn't matter to her because she enjoys sitting on that bench in her pajamas playing God
This judge is Prejudice she has denied me more than once after the people in the courtroom with her said there is nothing that I can do because of my disabilities she chooses to do this to me because she thinks that I'm an alcoholic the fact that she has no idea anything about my life doesn't matter to her because she enjoys sitting on that bench in her pajamas playing God
This judge is Prejudice she has denied me more than once after the people in the courtroom with her said there is nothing that I can do because of my disabilities she chooses to do this to me because she thinks that I'm an alcoholic the fact that she has no idea anything about my life doesn't matter to her because she enjoys sitting on that bench in her pajamas playing God
this woman has no business being a judge what's the point of having specialist in the courtroom telling her that the facts in front of her are true and that I am truly a disabled person just for her to say **** *** she doesn't care because she's using her own judgment she's not looking at statistics and facts she's using her personal Vendetta to ***** me
this woman has no business being a judge what's the point of having specialist in the courtroom telling her that the facts in front of her are true and that I am truly a disabled person just for her to say **** *** she doesn't care because she's using her own judgment she's not looking at statistics and facts she's using her personal Vendetta to ***** me
this woman has no business being a judge what's the point of having specialist in the courtroom telling her that the facts in front of her are true and that I am truly a disabled person just for her to say **** *** she doesn't care because she's using her own judgment she's not looking at statistics and facts she's using her personal Vendetta to ***** me
Really nice judge treats atty/rep and client nicely but... this is a judge that you really need to prepare well for. She reads very little about a persons impairment related issues BUT educates herself very well with negatives in a medical record (i.e. traveling,smoking,drug use,job seeking,criminal history etc..) I do not believe she reads a brief that is submitted for a case (she hasn't done so in my cases) so when she asks for an opening treat it like she has not read your brief it and address everything as well as any and all the negatives. She will take at face value everything her VE testifies to and has used VE's in the past that "skim" over details of what they are testifying to that is favorable (i.e. will not say the percentage of time a person can be off task rather just say: "not much can a person be off task") Lastly listen closely to her hypo's they tend to not cover impairments in the medical records by treating providers but rather from what she garners or gleens from client testimony and DDS. Look at your case and prepare for this judge as if you are preparing an appeal at Federal District Court level and MAKE A RECORD.
Really nice judge treats atty/rep and client nicely but... this is a judge that you really need to prepare well for. She reads very little about a persons impairment related issues BUT educates herself very well with negatives in a medical record (i.e. traveling,smoking,drug use,job seeking,criminal history etc..) I do not believe she reads a brief that is submitted for a case (she hasn't done so in my cases) so when she asks for an opening treat it like she has not read your brief it and address everything as well as any and all the negatives. She will take at face value everything her VE testifies to and has used VE's in the past that "skim" over details of what they are testifying to that is favorable (i.e. will not say the percentage of time a person can be off task rather just say: "not much can a person be off task") Lastly listen closely to her hypo's they tend to not cover impairments in the medical records by treating providers but rather from what she garners or gleens from client testimony and DDS. Look at your case and prepare for this judge as if you are preparing an appeal at Federal District Court level and MAKE A RECORD.
Really nice judge treats atty/rep and client nicely but... this is a judge that you really need to prepare well for. She reads very little about a persons impairment related issues BUT educates herself very well with negatives in a medical record (i.e. traveling,smoking,drug use,job seeking,criminal history etc..) I do not believe she reads a brief that is submitted for a case (she hasn't done so in my cases) so when she asks for an opening treat it like she has not read your brief it and address everything as well as any and all the negatives. She will take at face value everything her VE testifies to and has used VE's in the past that "skim" over details of what they are testifying to that is favorable (i.e. will not say the percentage of time a person can be off task rather just say: "not much can a person be off task") Lastly listen closely to her hypo's they tend to not cover impairments in the medical records by treating providers but rather from what she garners or gleens from client testimony and DDS. Look at your case and prepare for this judge as if you are preparing an appeal at Federal District Court level and MAKE A RECORD.
I KNOW THIS JUDGE DOES NOT LOOK AT THE RECORD AS A WHOLE,EVEN THOUGH SHE CLIAMS HER DECISION IS BASED ON THE RECORD AS A WHOLE.THE MEDICAL PROFFESIONALS THAT WORK WITH THE PATIENT ARE IGNORED, AND THE SO CALLED EXPERTS,FROM SSA,WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN SEEN THE PATIENT,ARE NOTICED ,AS IF THEY ARE GOD.FOR ANYONE WHO IS UNFORTUNITLY FACING THIS JUDGE,SAY YOUR PRAYERS,CROSS YOUR FINGERS,AND GET YOURSELF A BIG BOX OF TISSUE.
I KNOW THIS JUDGE DOES NOT LOOK AT THE RECORD AS A WHOLE,EVEN THOUGH SHE CLIAMS HER DECISION IS BASED ON THE RECORD AS A WHOLE.THE MEDICAL PROFFESIONALS THAT WORK WITH THE PATIENT ARE IGNORED, AND THE SO CALLED EXPERTS,FROM SSA,WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN SEEN THE PATIENT,ARE NOTICED ,AS IF THEY ARE GOD.FOR ANYONE WHO IS UNFORTUNITLY FACING THIS JUDGE,SAY YOUR PRAYERS,CROSS YOUR FINGERS,AND GET YOURSELF A BIG BOX OF TISSUE.
I KNOW THIS JUDGE DOES NOT LOOK AT THE RECORD AS A WHOLE,EVEN THOUGH SHE CLIAMS HER DECISION IS BASED ON THE RECORD AS A WHOLE.THE MEDICAL PROFFESIONALS THAT WORK WITH THE PATIENT ARE IGNORED, AND THE SO CALLED EXPERTS,FROM SSA,WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN SEEN THE PATIENT,ARE NOTICED ,AS IF THEY ARE GOD.FOR ANYONE WHO IS UNFORTUNITLY FACING THIS JUDGE,SAY YOUR PRAYERS,CROSS YOUR FINGERS,AND GET YOURSELF A BIG BOX OF TISSUE.
Judge Kunz does not judge fairly, as she did not know nearly enough about my disability to make a fair judgment. Why in the world would SS put/allow her in that seat when she may know the law, BUT not EVEN the basics of the SSDI approved disabilities???
Judge Kunz does not judge fairly, as she did not know nearly enough about my disability to make a fair judgment. Why in the world would SS put/allow her in that seat when she may know the law, BUT not EVEN the basics of the SSDI approved disabilities???
Judge Kunz does not judge fairly, as she did not know nearly enough about my disability to make a fair judgment. Why in the world would SS put/allow her in that seat when she may know the law, BUT not EVEN the basics of the SSDI approved disabilities???
She is a ***** plain and simple. I felt like she had already decided to deny me before even hearing my case. I don't think she even read all of my medical records because there were certain conditions that she never addressed. I have a bad ankle that needs surgery and I was told that the worst thing for my ankle would be a job that required sitting all day, that being up and moving around was the best thing. But she decided I could still do the office work I used to do, even though the Dr said otherwise. I pity anyone else who gets her for a judge also.
She is a ***** plain and simple. I felt like she had already decided to deny me before even hearing my case. I don't think she even read all of my medical records because there were certain conditions that she never addressed. I have a bad ankle that needs surgery and I was told that the worst thing for my ankle would be a job that required sitting all day, that being up and moving around was the best thing. But she decided I could still do the office work I used to do, even though the Dr said otherwise. I pity anyone else who gets her for a judge also.
She is a ***** plain and simple. I felt like she had already decided to deny me before even hearing my case. I don't think she even read all of my medical records because there were certain conditions that she never addressed. I have a bad ankle that needs surgery and I was told that the worst thing for my ankle would be a job that required sitting all day, that being up and moving around was the best thing. But she decided I could still do the office work I used to do, even though the Dr said otherwise. I pity anyone else who gets her for a judge also.
Mary Kunz is a unfair and horrible non-reading judge. Be careful going before her,she doesn't read all of your paperwork like she should. The evidence will be right there in front of her face in big and bold letters and she'll still deny your case.
Mary Kunz is a unfair and horrible non-reading judge. Be careful going before her,she doesn't read all of your paperwork like she should. The evidence will be right there in front of her face in big and bold letters and she'll still deny your case.
Mary Kunz is a unfair and horrible non-reading judge. Be careful going before her,she doesn't read all of your paperwork like she should. The evidence will be right there in front of her face in big and bold letters and she'll still deny your case.
Judge Mclaughlin is an excellent listener. Thorough and fair. She is clear and direct in her questions and is apprised of each case before, during and after her decision. She takes each client's case as individual and is focused on making a decision in the best interest of each person before her. While I do not know the decision she has made on my case, I write this opinion based upon my experience not based upon the results. I appreciated Judge McLaughlin because she was different than I expected and was not "burned out" listening to so many cases each one runs together. I appreciated being treated compassionately and like an individual. Thank you.
Judge Mclaughlin is an excellent listener. Thorough and fair. She is clear and direct in her questions and is apprised of each case before, during and after her decision. She takes each client's case as individual and is focused on making a decision in the best interest of each person before her. While I do not know the decision she has made on my case, I write this opinion based upon my experience not based upon the results. I appreciated Judge McLaughlin because she was different than I expected and was not "burned out" listening to so many cases each one runs together. I appreciated being treated compassionately and like an individual. Thank you.
Judge Mclaughlin is an excellent listener. Thorough and fair. She is clear and direct in her questions and is apprised of each case before, during and after her decision. She takes each client's case as individual and is focused on making a decision in the best interest of each person before her. While I do not know the decision she has made on my case, I write this opinion based upon my experience not based upon the results. I appreciated Judge McLaughlin because she was different than I expected and was not "burned out" listening to so many cases each one runs together. I appreciated being treated compassionately and like an individual. Thank you.
I am still awed by the stern but fair minded and gentlemanly manner of the judge even after he denied my appeal.
I am still awed by the stern but fair minded and gentlemanly manner of the judge even after he denied my appeal.
I am still awed by the stern but fair minded and gentlemanly manner of the judge even after he denied my appeal.
I would describe Judge Nelson as courteous, fair-minded, and compassionate, while at the same time being extremely knowledgeable and stern in the conduct of the hearing process.
I would describe Judge Nelson as courteous, fair-minded, and compassionate, while at the same time being extremely knowledgeable and stern in the conduct of the hearing process.
I would describe Judge Nelson as courteous, fair-minded, and compassionate, while at the same time being extremely knowledgeable and stern in the conduct of the hearing process.
I did what was required to continue to receive Medicare and Disability benefits by going down to the St. Paul office and signing forms, twice. First I was dropped from disability and now my benefits have stopped. I have found multiple lies in my record and I don't think anyone else here stating the experienced the same things are liars, I believe everyone making these claims to be truthful. And I know I am truthful and what I claim are lies are not simple errors or misstatements, they are entire lines fabricated and said to be my testimony. I've notified both the Inspector General and also gave all relevant detailed info to the FBI via phone correspondence, everything was heard and acknowledged by the FBI on the phone for what it is worth. Criminal allegations have been made by me and now both my Medicare and my Disability benefit have stopped. Though I continue to receive care from the hospital and health care workers.
I did what was required to continue to receive Medicare and Disability benefits by going down to the St. Paul office and signing forms, twice. First I was dropped from disability and now my benefits have stopped. I have found multiple lies in my record and I don't think anyone else here stating the experienced the same things are liars, I believe everyone making these claims to be truthful. And I know I am truthful and what I claim are lies are not simple errors or misstatements, they are entire lines fabricated and said to be my testimony. I've notified both the Inspector General and also gave all relevant detailed info to the FBI via phone correspondence, everything was heard and acknowledged by the FBI on the phone for what it is worth. Criminal allegations have been made by me and now both my Medicare and my Disability benefit have stopped. Though I continue to receive care from the hospital and health care workers.
I did what was required to continue to receive Medicare and Disability benefits by going down to the St. Paul office and signing forms, twice. First I was dropped from disability and now my benefits have stopped. I have found multiple lies in my record and I don't think anyone else here stating the experienced the same things are liars, I believe everyone making these claims to be truthful. And I know I am truthful and what I claim are lies are not simple errors or misstatements, they are entire lines fabricated and said to be my testimony. I've notified both the Inspector General and also gave all relevant detailed info to the FBI via phone correspondence, everything was heard and acknowledged by the FBI on the phone for what it is worth. Criminal allegations have been made by me and now both my Medicare and my Disability benefit have stopped. Though I continue to receive care from the hospital and health care workers.
He is very good looking and I wasn't expecting that at all, that made him even more intimidating. He is a straight to the point, no bull shit kind of guy. I can't say he was super good, or super bad. This was my first hearing/s. So based off my experience, I thought Judge Pharris handled the hearing well. My medical condition is not listed, and is rather complex. This was his first time encountering someone with this condition, and knew little to nothing about my condition prior to my case. So I was impressed that he actually took the time to do some researching on my condition before the hearing. I felt like he was a bit harsh sometimes but made his points VERY clear. Mainly focusing on how your condition efffects your ability to work, but he also looks at how it effects all other aspects in life.I felt like he genuinely cared and took everything into consideration. Overall, I think it went alright and hope to hear his final decision soon.
He is very good looking and I wasn't expecting that at all, that made him even more intimidating. He is a straight to the point, no bull shit kind of guy. I can't say he was super good, or super bad. This was my first hearing/s. So based off my experience, I thought Judge Pharris handled the hearing well. My medical condition is not listed, and is rather complex. This was his first time encountering someone with this condition, and knew little to nothing about my condition prior to my case. So I was impressed that he actually took the time to do some researching on my condition before the hearing. I felt like he was a bit harsh sometimes but made his points VERY clear. Mainly focusing on how your condition efffects your ability to work, but he also looks at how it effects all other aspects in life.I felt like he genuinely cared and took everything into consideration. Overall, I think it went alright and hope to hear his final decision soon.
He is very good looking and I wasn't expecting that at all, that made him even more intimidating. He is a straight to the point, no bull shit kind of guy. I can't say he was super good, or super bad. This was my first hearing/s. So based off my experience, I thought Judge Pharris handled the hearing well. My medical condition is not listed, and is rather complex. This was his first time encountering someone with this condition, and knew little to nothing about my condition prior to my case. So I was impressed that he actually took the time to do some researching on my condition before the hearing. I felt like he was a bit harsh sometimes but made his points VERY clear. Mainly focusing on how your condition efffects your ability to work, but he also looks at how it effects all other aspects in life.I felt like he genuinely cared and took everything into consideration. Overall, I think it went alright and hope to hear his final decision soon.
I have also found lies in my record and I believe if Micah Pharris himself has the same disability as me he would disagreed with what he judge me. In the real world you cannot find a job that would support you and your family with limitation to what he said. It is very hard to find those kind of job to just stand up when you want to sit down when u needed. This judge is very biased and he is not judging according to your disability. I would not recommend this stupid judge to anyone else.
I have also found lies in my record and I believe if Micah Pharris himself has the same disability as me he would disagreed with what he judge me. In the real world you cannot find a job that would support you and your family with limitation to what he said. It is very hard to find those kind of job to just stand up when you want to sit down when u needed. This judge is very biased and he is not judging according to your disability. I would not recommend this stupid judge to anyone else.
I have also found lies in my record and I believe if Micah Pharris himself has the same disability as me he would disagreed with what he judge me. In the real world you cannot find a job that would support you and your family with limitation to what he said. It is very hard to find those kind of job to just stand up when you want to sit down when u needed. This judge is very biased and he is not judging according to your disability. I would not recommend this stupid judge to anyone else.
As an attorney practicing before Mpls ODAR for many years I was trouble by Judge Quayles absolutely disrespectful behavior towards a claimant at a recent hearing. I was absolutely ashamed as an attorney that a sitting judge, who knows better, let his emotions get the better of him. This was uncharacteristic of Judge Quayle and I hope I never witness such unprofessional behavior by him again.
As an attorney practicing before Mpls ODAR for many years I was trouble by Judge Quayles absolutely disrespectful behavior towards a claimant at a recent hearing. I was absolutely ashamed as an attorney that a sitting judge, who knows better, let his emotions get the better of him. This was uncharacteristic of Judge Quayle and I hope I never witness such unprofessional behavior by him again.
As an attorney practicing before Mpls ODAR for many years I was trouble by Judge Quayles absolutely disrespectful behavior towards a claimant at a recent hearing. I was absolutely ashamed as an attorney that a sitting judge, who knows better, let his emotions get the better of him. This was uncharacteristic of Judge Quayle and I hope I never witness such unprofessional behavior by him again.
This judge is horrible. He assumes the worst without my ability to give explanation. Doctors are wrong many times and I couldn't even speak. He was very rude and condescending.
This judge is horrible. He assumes the worst without my ability to give explanation. Doctors are wrong many times and I couldn't even speak. He was very rude and condescending.
This judge is horrible. He assumes the worst without my ability to give explanation. Doctors are wrong many times and I couldn't even speak. He was very rude and condescending.
He is a no nonsense judge very cordial but you really need to have a case put together well. Write a brief have all MER's in and state your case. He asks for an opening you should rely on the brief you wrote and he does most of the questioning but will allow atty/rep follow up
He is a no nonsense judge very cordial but you really need to have a case put together well. Write a brief have all MER's in and state your case. He asks for an opening you should rely on the brief you wrote and he does most of the questioning but will allow atty/rep follow up
He is a no nonsense judge very cordial but you really need to have a case put together well. Write a brief have all MER's in and state your case. He asks for an opening you should rely on the brief you wrote and he does most of the questioning but will allow atty/rep follow up
Very honest and direct Judge, calls it as he see's it and if your truthful and honest you will gain more respect from him.
Very honest and direct Judge, calls it as he see's it and if your truthful and honest you will gain more respect from him.
Very honest and direct Judge, calls it as he see's it and if your truthful and honest you will gain more respect from him.
As a representative of a client I am embarrassed of Michael D Quayle. He interrupted my client several times making (him/her) feel very uncomfortable. There is literally no compassion while he uses his high power crushing the dreams and possibilities of others. The focus was on the facts and also breaking down my client.
As a representative of a client I am embarrassed of Michael D Quayle. He interrupted my client several times making (him/her) feel very uncomfortable. There is literally no compassion while he uses his high power crushing the dreams and possibilities of others. The focus was on the facts and also breaking down my client.
As a representative of a client I am embarrassed of Michael D Quayle. He interrupted my client several times making (him/her) feel very uncomfortable. There is literally no compassion while he uses his high power crushing the dreams and possibilities of others. The focus was on the facts and also breaking down my client.
Very good judge, covers all the bases and asks pointed questions. Made me feel totally at ease and listened to my responses. Seemed very compassionate about my case. You do need to prepare but don't lie or dramatize your responses as he WILL see right through it. Be courteous and on time, he runs a tight courtroom.
Very good judge, covers all the bases and asks pointed questions. Made me feel totally at ease and listened to my responses. Seemed very compassionate about my case. You do need to prepare but don't lie or dramatize your responses as he WILL see right through it. Be courteous and on time, he runs a tight courtroom.
Very good judge, covers all the bases and asks pointed questions. Made me feel totally at ease and listened to my responses. Seemed very compassionate about my case. You do need to prepare but don't lie or dramatize your responses as he WILL see right through it. Be courteous and on time, he runs a tight courtroom.
I requested that Judge Rabaut recuse himself from my client's case. He called and berated me for requesting the personal appearance of the CE, which is allowed by law. I told him that he was acting inappropriately and requested on the phone that he recuse himself, which he verbally denied. So, then I wrote a letter requesting he recuse himself and submitted the letter via Electronic Records Express. I asked in my letter that he never call me again and that he instead send me any communications via writing.
I requested that Judge Rabaut recuse himself from my client's case. He called and berated me for requesting the personal appearance of the CE, which is allowed by law. I told him that he was acting inappropriately and requested on the phone that he recuse himself, which he verbally denied. So, then I wrote a letter requesting he recuse himself and submitted the letter via Electronic Records Express. I asked in my letter that he never call me again and that he instead send me any communications via writing.
I requested that Judge Rabaut recuse himself from my client's case. He called and berated me for requesting the personal appearance of the CE, which is allowed by law. I told him that he was acting inappropriately and requested on the phone that he recuse himself, which he verbally denied. So, then I wrote a letter requesting he recuse himself and submitted the letter via Electronic Records Express. I asked in my letter that he never call me again and that he instead send me any communications via writing.
This Judge twisted just about everything I said. Some of things he said, were obvious lies.
This Judge twisted just about everything I said. Some of things he said, were obvious lies.
This Judge twisted just about everything I said. Some of things he said, were obvious lies.
This webpage indicates a 100 percent dismissal rate for JJR. This isn't accurate, is it?
This webpage indicates a 100 percent dismissal rate for JJR. This isn't accurate, is it?
This webpage indicates a 100 percent dismissal rate for JJR. This isn't accurate, is it?
John rabuat disapporved me . I have fusion and fused together verterbrate and feet fused and problems hands grasb. Ankylosing spondylitis .I have two kids and a wife. He ruined my life and makes himself evils. Medication will crreate a goood verterbrate and fix them very soon this is his best answer.
John rabuat disapporved me . I have fusion and fused together verterbrate and feet fused and problems hands grasb. Ankylosing spondylitis .I have two kids and a wife. He ruined my life and makes himself evils. Medication will crreate a goood verterbrate and fix them very soon this is his best answer.
John rabuat disapporved me . I have fusion and fused together verterbrate and feet fused and problems hands grasb. Ankylosing spondylitis .I have two kids and a wife. He ruined my life and makes himself evils. Medication will crreate a goood verterbrate and fix them very soon this is his best answer.
Please leave me alone You are responsible for my life I am not a person where you can practice your skills on. I am a person who is severing from ankylosing spondylitis I hope whoever is the reason in my rejection will have the pain i have and the ugly life. I live and i have seen many people reciveing ss without any symotms are any kind of disablity its just of different talk. You fool real disable and raward a fake disable none of you doing their job right but i hope you and your family sever and have the same situations.
Please leave me alone You are responsible for my life I am not a person where you can practice your skills on. I am a person who is severing from ankylosing spondylitis I hope whoever is the reason in my rejection will have the pain i have and the ugly life. I live and i have seen many people reciveing ss without any symotms are any kind of disablity its just of different talk. You fool real disable and raward a fake disable none of you doing their job right but i hope you and your family sever and have the same situations.
Please leave me alone You are responsible for my life I am not a person where you can practice your skills on. I am a person who is severing from ankylosing spondylitis I hope whoever is the reason in my rejection will have the pain i have and the ugly life. I live and i have seen many people reciveing ss without any symotms are any kind of disablity its just of different talk. You fool real disable and raward a fake disable none of you doing their job right but i hope you and your family sever and have the same situations.
I was denied by this judge,who did not have the correct information to make his decision. I am appalled after going to appeal counsel, I am to go before this judge again. He said (essentially) that I fooled my doctor of 3 years into believing I am sick. The amount of lab,MRI,spinal tap,and other Dr. Verification were all irrelevant. But,by all means send me back to this person again to prove that 30+ years of working means nothing to social security/the government. Thanks for ruining my life as much as Lupus and Multiple Sclorsis.
I was denied by this judge,who did not have the correct information to make his decision. I am appalled after going to appeal counsel, I am to go before this judge again. He said (essentially) that I fooled my doctor of 3 years into believing I am sick. The amount of lab,MRI,spinal tap,and other Dr. Verification were all irrelevant. But,by all means send me back to this person again to prove that 30+ years of working means nothing to social security/the government. Thanks for ruining my life as much as Lupus and Multiple Sclorsis.
I was denied by this judge,who did not have the correct information to make his decision. I am appalled after going to appeal counsel, I am to go before this judge again. He said (essentially) that I fooled my doctor of 3 years into believing I am sick. The amount of lab,MRI,spinal tap,and other Dr. Verification were all irrelevant. But,by all means send me back to this person again to prove that 30+ years of working means nothing to social security/the government. Thanks for ruining my life as much as Lupus and Multiple Sclorsis.
If you have the opportunity to have Judge Snelling as your Judge, you are very lucky. Judge Snelling listened to every word I spoke and was compassionate, fair, displayed knowledge and good judgment. He was unbiased and took my entire situation into consideration. I applied in 2011, it has been a long wait and I am really grateful for his decision.
If you have the opportunity to have Judge Snelling as your Judge, you are very lucky. Judge Snelling listened to every word I spoke and was compassionate, fair, displayed knowledge and good judgment. He was unbiased and took my entire situation into consideration. I applied in 2011, it has been a long wait and I am really grateful for his decision.
If you have the opportunity to have Judge Snelling as your Judge, you are very lucky. Judge Snelling listened to every word I spoke and was compassionate, fair, displayed knowledge and good judgment. He was unbiased and took my entire situation into consideration. I applied in 2011, it has been a long wait and I am really grateful for his decision.
very high kudos to Judge Snelling,he was professional in my ALJ hearing..my Atty was also very professional in asking me the questions..Judge wasnt harse but investigative at the trial I was really nervous and being that I am in Texas he decided to have my trial by phone..he didn't act like he wasn't going to make the decision that day he was fair and Honest.we went to local SSI office on 22nd of May and had person print out letter which is Favorable in Judge Snellings decision. to me which I've never have seen him or my Atty he had to go over all the evidence my Atty presented to him.Judge snelling in my book is fair.
very high kudos to Judge Snelling,he was professional in my ALJ hearing..my Atty was also very professional in asking me the questions..Judge wasnt harse but investigative at the trial I was really nervous and being that I am in Texas he decided to have my trial by phone..he didn't act like he wasn't going to make the decision that day he was fair and Honest.we went to local SSI office on 22nd of May and had person print out letter which is Favorable in Judge Snellings decision. to me which I've never have seen him or my Atty he had to go over all the evidence my Atty presented to him.Judge snelling in my book is fair.
very high kudos to Judge Snelling,he was professional in my ALJ hearing..my Atty was also very professional in asking me the questions..Judge wasnt harse but investigative at the trial I was really nervous and being that I am in Texas he decided to have my trial by phone..he didn't act like he wasn't going to make the decision that day he was fair and Honest.we went to local SSI office on 22nd of May and had person print out letter which is Favorable in Judge Snellings decision. to me which I've never have seen him or my Atty he had to go over all the evidence my Atty presented to him.Judge snelling in my book is fair.
I was very nervous at first, but he assured me that he just wanted to know my story...I cried a little, he was understanding, compassionate, and mase me feel much more relaxed. I do not yet know my results but I would rather go in front of Judge Snelling than any other judge.
I was very nervous at first, but he assured me that he just wanted to know my story...I cried a little, he was understanding, compassionate, and mase me feel much more relaxed. I do not yet know my results but I would rather go in front of Judge Snelling than any other judge.
I was very nervous at first, but he assured me that he just wanted to know my story...I cried a little, he was understanding, compassionate, and mase me feel much more relaxed. I do not yet know my results but I would rather go in front of Judge Snelling than any other judge.
he needs to be reviewed on his cases based on how many hispanics he denied.
he needs to be reviewed on his cases based on how many hispanics he denied.
he needs to be reviewed on his cases based on how many hispanics he denied.
Im looking for attorney or judge to help me get my ssi...
Im looking for attorney or judge to help me get my ssi...
Im looking for attorney or judge to help me get my ssi...
I appeared in front of judge Smelling Aug 3,2018...I was very nervous I'm glad to be able to be in his courtroom he explained everything to me ask even if I had any thing to say ..it was a good experience he didn't make me feel nervous..basically the hearing wasn't was I expected it was a good peaceful vibe. Thanks judge Smelling.
I appeared in front of judge Smelling Aug 3,2018...I was very nervous I'm glad to be able to be in his courtroom he explained everything to me ask even if I had any thing to say ..it was a good experience he didn't make me feel nervous..basically the hearing wasn't was I expected it was a good peaceful vibe. Thanks judge Smelling.
I appeared in front of judge Smelling Aug 3,2018...I was very nervous I'm glad to be able to be in his courtroom he explained everything to me ask even if I had any thing to say ..it was a good experience he didn't make me feel nervous..basically the hearing wasn't was I expected it was a good peaceful vibe. Thanks judge Smelling.
I went before judge Snelling for my SSI hearing August 3rd 2018 and although it was very nerve-wracking it was a necessary process I felt a human kindness from Judge Snelling that I had not expected to feel in there. I was able to share honestly and felt I didn't have to withhold anyting and there would be a fairness to his decision. I will always remember at one point the hardest maybe for me he gave me a few minutes to regain myself I might have cried a little I'm sure I did they were hard questions it was at that point that judge Snelling with a great human kindness in his eyes ask me if I was okay and could go on then he said directly to me ( I want you to know I intend on granting this case) I was of course filled with A Great hope as well as overwhelmed with that statement! After the hearing I asked my attorney if that was something that I could rely upon as a favorable decision in my case. She reminded me that he is an administrative law judge and it was recorded however there's a lot that goes into the decision-making of one's life and disability but it was comforting that he did have that intention and I hope for the best. Having said that however what I want my point to be here is that I felt a human kindness and fairness from him and no matter what the decision I will not ever forget that , and even though my situation and present circumstances are filled with adversity I am grateful that he was my judge and forever grateful to my attorney Melissa Proudian and I hope for the best I pray for a great peace to you all for your help dedication education everything that goes into all that you have put forth to help me with the situation I am in as a result of my sad and unexpected disabilities. I am aware there will always be someone who is much worse off . I think often of judge Snelling as I pray in the evening and I think he wood agree that at the end of the day he does his best and my gratitude to him and his hard work and fairness is appreciate by him. It would do us all good to remember (I believe) that My Hope of a favorable decision should be with my God to him be the Glory of all the undeserved grace bestowed to me. Once again thank you peace to you all Godspeed. I will end with a favorite quote of mine from Shawshank Redemption. (Sometimes hope is all we have, and hope is a good thing! And a good thing never dies.) Let it be so
I went before judge Snelling for my SSI hearing August 3rd 2018 and although it was very nerve-wracking it was a necessary process I felt a human kindness from Judge Snelling that I had not expected to feel in there. I was able to share honestly and felt I didn't have to withhold anyting and there would be a fairness to his decision. I will always remember at one point the hardest maybe for me he gave me a few minutes to regain myself I might have cried a little I'm sure I did they were hard questions it was at that point that judge Snelling with a great human kindness in his eyes ask me if I was okay and could go on then he said directly to me ( I want you to know I intend on granting this case) I was of course filled with A Great hope as well as overwhelmed with that statement! After the hearing I asked my attorney if that was something that I could rely upon as a favorable decision in my case. She reminded me that he is an administrative law judge and it was recorded however there's a lot that goes into the decision-making of one's life and disability but it was comforting that he did have that intention and I hope for the best. Having said that however what I want my point to be here is that I felt a human kindness and fairness from him and no matter what the decision I will not ever forget that , and even though my situation and present circumstances are filled with adversity I am grateful that he was my judge and forever grateful to my attorney Melissa Proudian and I hope for the best I pray for a great peace to you all for your help dedication education everything that goes into all that you have put forth to help me with the situation I am in as a result of my sad and unexpected disabilities. I am aware there will always be someone who is much worse off . I think often of judge Snelling as I pray in the evening and I think he wood agree that at the end of the day he does his best and my gratitude to him and his hard work and fairness is appreciate by him. It would do us all good to remember (I believe) that My Hope of a favorable decision should be with my God to him be the Glory of all the undeserved grace bestowed to me. Once again thank you peace to you all Godspeed. I will end with a favorite quote of mine from Shawshank Redemption. (Sometimes hope is all we have, and hope is a good thing! And a good thing never dies.) Let it be so
I went before judge Snelling for my SSI hearing August 3rd 2018 and although it was very nerve-wracking it was a necessary process I felt a human kindness from Judge Snelling that I had not expected to feel in there. I was able to share honestly and felt I didn't have to withhold anyting and there would be a fairness to his decision. I will always remember at one point the hardest maybe for me he gave me a few minutes to regain myself I might have cried a little I'm sure I did they were hard questions it was at that point that judge Snelling with a great human kindness in his eyes ask me if I was okay and could go on then he said directly to me ( I want you to know I intend on granting this case) I was of course filled with A Great hope as well as overwhelmed with that statement! After the hearing I asked my attorney if that was something that I could rely upon as a favorable decision in my case. She reminded me that he is an administrative law judge and it was recorded however there's a lot that goes into the decision-making of one's life and disability but it was comforting that he did have that intention and I hope for the best. Having said that however what I want my point to be here is that I felt a human kindness and fairness from him and no matter what the decision I will not ever forget that , and even though my situation and present circumstances are filled with adversity I am grateful that he was my judge and forever grateful to my attorney Melissa Proudian and I hope for the best I pray for a great peace to you all for your help dedication education everything that goes into all that you have put forth to help me with the situation I am in as a result of my sad and unexpected disabilities. I am aware there will always be someone who is much worse off . I think often of judge Snelling as I pray in the evening and I think he wood agree that at the end of the day he does his best and my gratitude to him and his hard work and fairness is appreciate by him. It would do us all good to remember (I believe) that My Hope of a favorable decision should be with my God to him be the Glory of all the undeserved grace bestowed to me. Once again thank you peace to you all Godspeed. I will end with a favorite quote of mine from Shawshank Redemption. (Sometimes hope is all we have, and hope is a good thing! And a good thing never dies.) Let it be so
my name is Tammy Jones. I seen Timothy back in September 14th and I was very nervous. And then he had to work sex pert commune to see if I was disabled. And the work expert said I was. He said that he would try to get to my case soon as possible but there's other cases before mine. He's a nice judge I liked him he's a really good guy he is very kind to me and he told me to speak up. I didn't have an attorney and at the end of the hearing. He said that he could tell that I was having a hard time. so I want to thank you Timothy for helping me get through this. and I'm just wondering if I'm going to be approved soon.. I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 that's when my hearing was. Unless I went to the Social Security office yesterday and they sent an email to Timothy. I was under the impression that he might expedite my case because of my situation. I have seizures and everything I can't work I can't do nothing. That's what the work expertise told him to. If you could please get to my case that would be so great. because it's not easy for me having seizures and living on the street and other problems. Thank you so much and have a great day
my name is Tammy Jones. I seen Timothy back in September 14th and I was very nervous. And then he had to work sex pert commune to see if I was disabled. And the work expert said I was. He said that he would try to get to my case soon as possible but there's other cases before mine. He's a nice judge I liked him he's a really good guy he is very kind to me and he told me to speak up. I didn't have an attorney and at the end of the hearing. He said that he could tell that I was having a hard time. so I want to thank you Timothy for helping me get through this. and I'm just wondering if I'm going to be approved soon.. I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 that's when my hearing was. Unless I went to the Social Security office yesterday and they sent an email to Timothy. I was under the impression that he might expedite my case because of my situation. I have seizures and everything I can't work I can't do nothing. That's what the work expertise told him to. If you could please get to my case that would be so great. because it's not easy for me having seizures and living on the street and other problems. Thank you so much and have a great day
my name is Tammy Jones. I seen Timothy back in September 14th and I was very nervous. And then he had to work sex pert commune to see if I was disabled. And the work expert said I was. He said that he would try to get to my case soon as possible but there's other cases before mine. He's a nice judge I liked him he's a really good guy he is very kind to me and he told me to speak up. I didn't have an attorney and at the end of the hearing. He said that he could tell that I was having a hard time. so I want to thank you Timothy for helping me get through this. and I'm just wondering if I'm going to be approved soon.. I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 I've been waiting since September 14th 2018 that's when my hearing was. Unless I went to the Social Security office yesterday and they sent an email to Timothy. I was under the impression that he might expedite my case because of my situation. I have seizures and everything I can't work I can't do nothing. That's what the work expertise told him to. If you could please get to my case that would be so great. because it's not easy for me having seizures and living on the street and other problems. Thank you so much and have a great day
My name is Tammie Lynn Jones. My hearing was September 14th 2018. Timothy s Snelling. I thought he was a pretty good judge. But then I got a letter saying that I got denied for undeniable reasons. I don't understand. I didn't have an attorney to represent me. I have a grand mal seizures I can't work at all. I have a lot of health issues. I thought when Timothy s Snelling asked me if he could bring in the work experts to see if I was disabled.the work expert told Timothy s Snelling that there was no jobs for me in my situation. Timothy s Snelling at the end of the hearing asked if I have any more questions that's a no. anyways he said that he could see that I was struggling and having a really hard.i told the judge every thing he need to know .at least I thought I did .i don't understand why all my medical recorders were not in my files. I see doctors for my grandma seizures.and I have to take medicine for them everyday. the judge they got he would try to get to my case as soon as possible.I thought that he was going to grant me my benefits. I told him I'm homeless I have really bad seizures I cannot work. I don't even have Medi-Cal. I suffer from depression and bipolar. now I don't know what to do. Because there's no one who's going to hire me not what grandma seizures. Depression and bipolar even the work expert that he brought in said there is no jobs for me. I thought that after work expert so the judge that there was no work for a person like me and my situation. That I would have been approved for my disability. I've been struggling a lot and I really need to be approved will my social security benefits. I don't know why he came up with the undeniable reasons for me to not be granted my money . I'm just beside myself right now. I don't know why good for undeniable reasons said I can't be granted.i have suffering and going through pain and hardship. Waiting for his decision to grant me my money back now I don't know what to do about his decision and I don't understand his decision I'm denial reasons what does that supposed to mean judge that I'm not disabled because I'm very disabled and I have doctors proof I don't mean to take up all your time would at least tell me that I was going to be denied at the hearing. I know I didn't answer your questions like you needed me to but I tried really hard I have problems remembering things. I'm not receiving any funds from welfare or food stamps or medical. I think you're pretty good judge he seems pretty nice. I can't get a job there's nobody that will hire me not what these Grandma seizures I have. I was hoping you would have granted me my benefits. And not this whole mess would have been over. I've been through pain and suffering waiting through all this and then the letter says for undeniable reasons. good seizures are not undeniable reasons bipolars not undeniable reasons and it's not my fault that all the medical records was not there that day. I did everything I was supposed to do. and it's not my fault that I didn't have none attorney. now what am I supposed to do judge. I can't work I'm disabled. Even your work expert said yes there is no jobs for a person in my situation. can you said that when you made the decision it would be final. anyway you can please review my case and approve me I really need to be approved for my benefit there's nothing I can do. I did everything on my part the Social Security hearings even though I didn't have an attorney please reconsider and approve me my case grants please God bless you. I just can't take much more had so much pain and suffering waiting out this. Hoping for a good outcome. Whether all my medical records was there or not. Please send me a approval letter.insead of undeniable letter thank you again Tammie Jones
My name is Tammie Lynn Jones. My hearing was September 14th 2018. Timothy s Snelling. I thought he was a pretty good judge. But then I got a letter saying that I got denied for undeniable reasons. I don't understand. I didn't have an attorney to represent me. I have a grand mal seizures I can't work at all. I have a lot of health issues. I thought when Timothy s Snelling asked me if he could bring in the work experts to see if I was disabled.the work expert told Timothy s Snelling that there was no jobs for me in my situation. Timothy s Snelling at the end of the hearing asked if I have any more questions that's a no. anyways he said that he could see that I was struggling and having a really hard.i told the judge every thing he need to know .at least I thought I did .i don't understand why all my medical recorders were not in my files. I see doctors for my grandma seizures.and I have to take medicine for them everyday. the judge they got he would try to get to my case as soon as possible.I thought that he was going to grant me my benefits. I told him I'm homeless I have really bad seizures I cannot work. I don't even have Medi-Cal. I suffer from depression and bipolar. now I don't know what to do. Because there's no one who's going to hire me not what grandma seizures. Depression and bipolar even the work expert that he brought in said there is no jobs for me. I thought that after work expert so the judge that there was no work for a person like me and my situation. That I would have been approved for my disability. I've been struggling a lot and I really need to be approved will my social security benefits. I don't know why he came up with the undeniable reasons for me to not be granted my money . I'm just beside myself right now. I don't know why good for undeniable reasons said I can't be granted.i have suffering and going through pain and hardship. Waiting for his decision to grant me my money back now I don't know what to do about his decision and I don't understand his decision I'm denial reasons what does that supposed to mean judge that I'm not disabled because I'm very disabled and I have doctors proof I don't mean to take up all your time would at least tell me that I was going to be denied at the hearing. I know I didn't answer your questions like you needed me to but I tried really hard I have problems remembering things. I'm not receiving any funds from welfare or food stamps or medical. I think you're pretty good judge he seems pretty nice. I can't get a job there's nobody that will hire me not what these Grandma seizures I have. I was hoping you would have granted me my benefits. And not this whole mess would have been over. I've been through pain and suffering waiting through all this and then the letter says for undeniable reasons. good seizures are not undeniable reasons bipolars not undeniable reasons and it's not my fault that all the medical records was not there that day. I did everything I was supposed to do. and it's not my fault that I didn't have none attorney. now what am I supposed to do judge. I can't work I'm disabled. Even your work expert said yes there is no jobs for a person in my situation. can you said that when you made the decision it would be final. anyway you can please review my case and approve me I really need to be approved for my benefit there's nothing I can do. I did everything on my part the Social Security hearings even though I didn't have an attorney please reconsider and approve me my case grants please God bless you. I just can't take much more had so much pain and suffering waiting out this. Hoping for a good outcome. Whether all my medical records was there or not. Please send me a approval letter.insead of undeniable letter thank you again Tammie Jones
My name is Tammie Lynn Jones. My hearing was September 14th 2018. Timothy s Snelling. I thought he was a pretty good judge. But then I got a letter saying that I got denied for undeniable reasons. I don't understand. I didn't have an attorney to represent me. I have a grand mal seizures I can't work at all. I have a lot of health issues. I thought when Timothy s Snelling asked me if he could bring in the work experts to see if I was disabled.the work expert told Timothy s Snelling that there was no jobs for me in my situation. Timothy s Snelling at the end of the hearing asked if I have any more questions that's a no. anyways he said that he could see that I was struggling and having a really hard.i told the judge every thing he need to know .at least I thought I did .i don't understand why all my medical recorders were not in my files. I see doctors for my grandma seizures.and I have to take medicine for them everyday. the judge they got he would try to get to my case as soon as possible.I thought that he was going to grant me my benefits. I told him I'm homeless I have really bad seizures I cannot work. I don't even have Medi-Cal. I suffer from depression and bipolar. now I don't know what to do. Because there's no one who's going to hire me not what grandma seizures. Depression and bipolar even the work expert that he brought in said there is no jobs for me. I thought that after work expert so the judge that there was no work for a person like me and my situation. That I would have been approved for my disability. I've been struggling a lot and I really need to be approved will my social security benefits. I don't know why he came up with the undeniable reasons for me to not be granted my money . I'm just beside myself right now. I don't know why good for undeniable reasons said I can't be granted.i have suffering and going through pain and hardship. Waiting for his decision to grant me my money back now I don't know what to do about his decision and I don't understand his decision I'm denial reasons what does that supposed to mean judge that I'm not disabled because I'm very disabled and I have doctors proof I don't mean to take up all your time would at least tell me that I was going to be denied at the hearing. I know I didn't answer your questions like you needed me to but I tried really hard I have problems remembering things. I'm not receiving any funds from welfare or food stamps or medical. I think you're pretty good judge he seems pretty nice. I can't get a job there's nobody that will hire me not what these Grandma seizures I have. I was hoping you would have granted me my benefits. And not this whole mess would have been over. I've been through pain and suffering waiting through all this and then the letter says for undeniable reasons. good seizures are not undeniable reasons bipolars not undeniable reasons and it's not my fault that all the medical records was not there that day. I did everything I was supposed to do. and it's not my fault that I didn't have none attorney. now what am I supposed to do judge. I can't work I'm disabled. Even your work expert said yes there is no jobs for a person in my situation. can you said that when you made the decision it would be final. anyway you can please review my case and approve me I really need to be approved for my benefit there's nothing I can do. I did everything on my part the Social Security hearings even though I didn't have an attorney please reconsider and approve me my case grants please God bless you. I just can't take much more had so much pain and suffering waiting out this. Hoping for a good outcome. Whether all my medical records was there or not. Please send me a approval letter.insead of undeniable letter thank you again Tammie Jones
I was seen by Judge Snelling on 426/2019, he was very professional and he was very attentive and he looked directly at me when asking questions so that made me fewl very comfortable. He is a fair Judge and he is very thorough. They need more judges like him in the system because i truly believe that he cares about doing what is right and fair. I just want to say thank you Judge Snelling.
I was seen by Judge Snelling on 426/2019, he was very professional and he was very attentive and he looked directly at me when asking questions so that made me fewl very comfortable. He is a fair Judge and he is very thorough. They need more judges like him in the system because i truly believe that he cares about doing what is right and fair. I just want to say thank you Judge Snelling.
I was seen by Judge Snelling on 426/2019, he was very professional and he was very attentive and he looked directly at me when asking questions so that made me fewl very comfortable. He is a fair Judge and he is very thorough. They need more judges like him in the system because i truly believe that he cares about doing what is right and fair. I just want to say thank you Judge Snelling.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
One of the best judges I have appeared before in representing clients before SSA. Very prompt (convened hearing 2 min. early!!)and very friendly. Joked with my client to put him at ease. He obviously read the file prior to the hearing. He chatted with my client for 10 minutes, then issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
I agree with previous comments. He was friendly and straightforward. Knew the file well. Issued a favorable bench decision.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this ALJ no longer works in this office. He moved back East. Too bad. He was the best one in this office, in my opinion.
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Denied my claim a few weeks later after the hearing when I had all of my records and an attorney... Now I will have to wait even longer..........
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza was very kind. He was very familiar with my case and adjourned the hearing within 20 minutes. I received a favorable decision 3 months later.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza has no understanding or basic knowledge of mental illness. He relied on a phone call from a Dr who has never seen me, to give him an opinion on my health and he chose to believe information taken off the internet that was totally false about me. It was very easy to prove that this info was false, companies had grabbed my photo for advertising purposes, yet this judge decided if it was on the internet, it must be true. I had undercover police sent to my house with a fictitious story, working for the ODAR office-yet he took this report as evidence also. These two men caused great harm to my mental health as well. Judge Souza did not consider the report from SSDI own psychological evaluation ruling me disabled or any of my treating Drs. Instead he based his decision on false reports, assumptions/opinions on photos on my facebook page and a Dr who has never seen me or treated me. Judge Souza terminated my benefits at an advanced age after nearly two decades of receiving them. Judge Souza should not talk about how much he wants to retire while waiting for a hearing to start.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
Judge Souza terminated my benefits after I'd received them for 18 years. I'm 55 yrs old and unable to work due to bipolar disorder. The SSDI psychologists reports said I was disabled as did my own Dr and therapist. He threw those reports out. Instead, he called a Dr in another state who has never seen me. That Dr said so what, she has mood swings, don't we all and laughed. This was the testimony Judge Souza went by. He also relied heavily on false information about me online and photos from my Facebook page. He has little to no knowledge of mental health issues. Having a photo of oneself smiling sitting in the sun does not mean that a person no longer has bipolar disorder. If my Facebook page was a problem then probably no one should qualify for SSDI. Judge Souza also based decision on a report done by undercover police Sent to my house under false pretenses. Sending male police officers to my house has caused PTSD. I am a rape victim and he should have considered that would be a trigger for me. This 3 year appeal process has left my health worse than when I started. The entire SS process needs to be looked at. It's damaging and the wrong people are getting terminated in order to cut the budget for the state of MO.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
This judge is a conniving ***** ** **** the first hearing sounded really good then was denied a month later, his decision for my case was upheld twice with appeals. I had all the right records from my attorney. Him and the rest of these ******** need to be fired for being such incompetent ****** ** ****.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I felt Judge Souza was down to earth. Reminded me of my Uncle Delano in Oregon. Judge Souza is direct and reliable, respectable during the hearing. I use to be timid, shy and passive aggressive, which hurt me and my character. Sometimes, people think I am angry, when I am talking, writing letters. I can be intense and I am very passionate about the truth, my circumstances. I care about people, and their well being and for the good for others. I hope that all those people before me that had gone through the Social Security application and hearings process will go back and appeal their denial letters due to the copy of letter that the Social Security Administraton office's automatically printed out letters to prospective clients that read like this: You are expected to go to a hearing and you have a phone interview at 1:30 P.M. with Judge So and So ____________________________ and the remainder of the letter, it states that you are also to be at the hearing in person. I am the person responsible for those letters being amended due to another Judge, whom, I will not say due to Privacy laws and common sense. I will say that through my going through the a Judge_______________________I found out that, I could write a letter to our Representative, asking for assistance. I had been discriminated against me for being Homeless.
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
I appreciate Chief Judge Souza. I thought he was nice and down to earth. He reminded me of my Uncle back home spoke to me. Direct, respectable and honestly. Chief Judge Souza is very easy to talk with. I hope all the people that were sent denial letters by other judges, will go back and re-read the top page and realize that there was an error and to be fair, it is in your best interest when finding an attorney that he or she takes the time to serve you the best . In mentioning this, I am the person who is responsible for notifying a certain Judge that used this error against me due to my being Homeless in Seattle,WA. The formal letter requesting a hearing use to state that : There is a phone hearing/interview at 1:30 P.M. and then the date: ____________. Then below this paragraph there was space of 6 lines, then below that was wording that stated you were to also attend this appointment in person. I missed this the first couple times, I had read it, but after, a particular Judge whom I had never met, talked down to me, and treated me disrespectfully and there was no reason for that kind of behavior. I had caught the error and I am hoping from now on there will be more fairness and respectful and honest outcomes in the near future for all those who are in need. Sincerly, and Take care,
******** judge not fair at all
******** judge not fair at all
******** judge not fair at all
Richard Staples is very fair.
Richard Staples is very fair.
Richard Staples is very fair.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
I was lucky to have my hearing with Judge Staples. I didn't fit all the SS criteria for one disability, but was/am very close to it in multiple areas. I had a history of working very closely with my doctors and vocational rehab. I was/am med and therapy compliant. I even sought help from a highly specialized occupational therapist. During the hearing I was honest, no exagerations or overstatements of my symptoms. This judge looked at the whole picture and gave me a fully favorable bench decision. I know he has a realky good BS detector because after I got the approval and had to switch doctors and therapists, I found out my previous providers were not in favor of my disability application. I have started to work again. I may never be fully off disability, but I am working and paying taxes again. The judges want to see that you have tried everything possible. Even if you think you'll never work again, call your nearest Workforce Center and start working with vocational rehab. It shows you are making an effort. You'd be suprised at what vocational rehab can do! It gives you something to do while waiting and you may find there is something ou there for you.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
Judge Staples is neither fair nor unfair.
canada viagra viagra for sale no prescription viagra
canada viagra viagra for sale no prescription viagra
This judge's track record is absolutely horrendous!! With no fault of his own, my brother in-law who lives with us will suffer the consequences of this judges decision for awhile!! We found this information out on this website just before my brother in-laws hearing. Judge Robert Thomas has the worst percentage for cases denied and 2nd worst for approvals. My brother in-law will now be added to this judges negative statistics. My brother in-law had extensive testing done by 3 separate Psychologist in the last 2 years for the mental disability he was born with. The results of 3 independent tests reached the same agreement that there was developmental cognitive disorder and other significant mental deficits that would make it extremely difficult for my brother in-law to work and hold a job. In conclusion this judge gave the opinion of other medical professionals significant weight and or great weight with their subjective comments. Some of these medical professionals had never seen, talked to or tested my brother in-law. The judge made his decision that my brother in-law was not disabled and denied him benefits. Some of the information we discovered when reading this judges decision was erroneous and not true. We were getting free, but horrible representation thru Chamberlin Edmonds. The attorney was supposed to arrive a 1/2 hour before the hearing to discuss my brother in-laws case. She was assigned to us just a week before the hearing. We had no previous contact with her until she arrived just moments before the hearing was due to start (1/2 hour late). We had 2 minutes of conversation with her and walked into the hearing room 5 minutes late. We plan to tell her she's fired. We also plan to appeal the decision of this judge and get more qualified representation thru Midwest Disability.
This judge's track record is absolutely horrendous!! With no fault of his own, my brother in-law who lives with us will suffer the consequences of this judges decision for awhile!! We found this information out on this website just before my brother in-laws hearing. Judge Robert Thomas has the worst percentage for cases denied and 2nd worst for approvals. My brother in-law will now be added to this judges negative statistics. My brother in-law had extensive testing done by 3 separate Psychologist in the last 2 years for the mental disability he was born with. The results of 3 independent tests reached the same agreement that there was developmental cognitive disorder and other significant mental deficits that would make it extremely difficult for my brother in-law to work and hold a job. In conclusion this judge gave the opinion of other medical professionals significant weight and or great weight with their subjective comments. Some of these medical professionals had never seen, talked to or tested my brother in-law. The judge made his decision that my brother in-law was not disabled and denied him benefits. Some of the information we discovered when reading this judges decision was erroneous and not true. We were getting free, but horrible representation thru Chamberlin Edmonds. The attorney was supposed to arrive a 1/2 hour before the hearing to discuss my brother in-laws case. She was assigned to us just a week before the hearing. We had no previous contact with her until she arrived just moments before the hearing was due to start (1/2 hour late). We had 2 minutes of conversation with her and walked into the hearing room 5 minutes late. We plan to tell her she's fired. We also plan to appeal the decision of this judge and get more qualified representation thru Midwest Disability.
This judge's track record is absolutely horrendous!! With no fault of his own, my brother in-law who lives with us will suffer the consequences of this judges decision for awhile!! We found this information out on this website just before my brother in-laws hearing. Judge Robert Thomas has the worst percentage for cases denied and 2nd worst for approvals. My brother in-law will now be added to this judges negative statistics. My brother in-law had extensive testing done by 3 separate Psychologist in the last 2 years for the mental disability he was born with. The results of 3 independent tests reached the same agreement that there was developmental cognitive disorder and other significant mental deficits that would make it extremely difficult for my brother in-law to work and hold a job. In conclusion this judge gave the opinion of other medical professionals significant weight and or great weight with their subjective comments. Some of these medical professionals had never seen, talked to or tested my brother in-law. The judge made his decision that my brother in-law was not disabled and denied him benefits. Some of the information we discovered when reading this judges decision was erroneous and not true. We were getting free, but horrible representation thru Chamberlin Edmonds. The attorney was supposed to arrive a 1/2 hour before the hearing to discuss my brother in-laws case. She was assigned to us just a week before the hearing. We had no previous contact with her until she arrived just moments before the hearing was due to start (1/2 hour late). We had 2 minutes of conversation with her and walked into the hearing room 5 minutes late. We plan to tell her she's fired. We also plan to appeal the decision of this judge and get more qualified representation thru Midwest Disability.
State of Minnesota Obstacles ♦ Up to two-thirds of SSI applicants drop out of the extensive approval process before getting to the hearing level. ♦ Minnesota is ranked 44th out of 50 states in the rate of people on SSI. ♦ In Minnesota, 57.6% of initial SSI claims are denied. Of all claimants who request reconsideration, 81.2% are denied. ♦ Total time from initial SSI application to hearing usually exceeds one year.
State of Minnesota Obstacles ♦ Up to two-thirds of SSI applicants drop out of the extensive approval process before getting to the hearing level. ♦ Minnesota is ranked 44th out of 50 states in the rate of people on SSI. ♦ In Minnesota, 57.6% of initial SSI claims are denied. Of all claimants who request reconsideration, 81.2% are denied. ♦ Total time from initial SSI application to hearing usually exceeds one year.
State of Minnesota Obstacles ♦ Up to two-thirds of SSI applicants drop out of the extensive approval process before getting to the hearing level. ♦ Minnesota is ranked 44th out of 50 states in the rate of people on SSI. ♦ In Minnesota, 57.6% of initial SSI claims are denied. Of all claimants who request reconsideration, 81.2% are denied. ♦ Total time from initial SSI application to hearing usually exceeds one year.
Not a fan of him at all.
Not a fan of him at all.
Not a fan of him at all.
The corruption of the system and those involved and the inability of this Judge and I use this term loosely to execute his duties is astounding. I read some of the other comments posted and could not believe the similarities of what has recently happened with my wives hearing and subsequent "Unfavorable" findings. The double speak and and statements in the findings have so many errors its hard to believe that this judge still has a job, only a weatherman can make such errors and still be employed. This judge clearly put alot of thought into misrepresenting the facts of the case. The so called medical witness (MD) that provided testimony is not even qualified to testify with regards to my wife case. Our lawyer stated after the testimony was complete that if an MD is to compliant to support the claimant for approval, they are usually fired and no longer used to testify as it is the purpose of the system to do its best to deny any and all of the benefits the claimant is/are entitled to. I can only wonder how a they can live with there less than moral behavior. 2-1/2 years and counting, what a wonderful Government we have! I am so glad that I have had the opportunity to contribute over $850,000 to the Social Security Ponzi scheme. I rate the system and this judge a resounding negative 10 stars.
The corruption of the system and those involved and the inability of this Judge and I use this term loosely to execute his duties is astounding. I read some of the other comments posted and could not believe the similarities of what has recently happened with my wives hearing and subsequent "Unfavorable" findings. The double speak and and statements in the findings have so many errors its hard to believe that this judge still has a job, only a weatherman can make such errors and still be employed. This judge clearly put alot of thought into misrepresenting the facts of the case. The so called medical witness (MD) that provided testimony is not even qualified to testify with regards to my wife case. Our lawyer stated after the testimony was complete that if an MD is to compliant to support the claimant for approval, they are usually fired and no longer used to testify as it is the purpose of the system to do its best to deny any and all of the benefits the claimant is/are entitled to. I can only wonder how a they can live with there less than moral behavior. 2-1/2 years and counting, what a wonderful Government we have! I am so glad that I have had the opportunity to contribute over $850,000 to the Social Security Ponzi scheme. I rate the system and this judge a resounding negative 10 stars.
The corruption of the system and those involved and the inability of this Judge and I use this term loosely to execute his duties is astounding. I read some of the other comments posted and could not believe the similarities of what has recently happened with my wives hearing and subsequent "Unfavorable" findings. The double speak and and statements in the findings have so many errors its hard to believe that this judge still has a job, only a weatherman can make such errors and still be employed. This judge clearly put alot of thought into misrepresenting the facts of the case. The so called medical witness (MD) that provided testimony is not even qualified to testify with regards to my wife case. Our lawyer stated after the testimony was complete that if an MD is to compliant to support the claimant for approval, they are usually fired and no longer used to testify as it is the purpose of the system to do its best to deny any and all of the benefits the claimant is/are entitled to. I can only wonder how a they can live with there less than moral behavior. 2-1/2 years and counting, what a wonderful Government we have! I am so glad that I have had the opportunity to contribute over $850,000 to the Social Security Ponzi scheme. I rate the system and this judge a resounding negative 10 stars.
I totally disagree with the comments above. According to the numerous attorneys, he is well-known to be a tough judge to approve it. In my opinion, once he sees a claimant is really disabled, the judge is very nice and reasonable. He was very friendly to me during the hearing and made me very comfortable. I was very relax during the entire hearing.
I totally disagree with the comments above. According to the numerous attorneys, he is well-known to be a tough judge to approve it. In my opinion, once he sees a claimant is really disabled, the judge is very nice and reasonable. He was very friendly to me during the hearing and made me very comfortable. I was very relax during the entire hearing.
I totally disagree with the comments above. According to the numerous attorneys, he is well-known to be a tough judge to approve it. In my opinion, once he sees a claimant is really disabled, the judge is very nice and reasonable. He was very friendly to me during the hearing and made me very comfortable. I was very relax during the entire hearing.
Has the lowest rate of approval of Minnesota Judges. He misrepresent the facts so that he can deny you. This man clearly believes that everyone is out to con the system. I have contacted my Dr who denies ever stating what this Judge said. He also used a retired Dr from St Cloud. Being Jewish I am concerned what this Doctor said as St Cloud is the most Anti Semitic city in Minnesota. I was doomed from the start. This judge should be impeached.
Has the lowest rate of approval of Minnesota Judges. He misrepresent the facts so that he can deny you. This man clearly believes that everyone is out to con the system. I have contacted my Dr who denies ever stating what this Judge said. He also used a retired Dr from St Cloud. Being Jewish I am concerned what this Doctor said as St Cloud is the most Anti Semitic city in Minnesota. I was doomed from the start. This judge should be impeached.
Has the lowest rate of approval of Minnesota Judges. He misrepresent the facts so that he can deny you. This man clearly believes that everyone is out to con the system. I have contacted my Dr who denies ever stating what this Judge said. He also used a retired Dr from St Cloud. Being Jewish I am concerned what this Doctor said as St Cloud is the most Anti Semitic city in Minnesota. I was doomed from the start. This judge should be impeached.
Before I read this site, I also found inaccuracies, omissions, wrong provider information & information exclusions to support denial. I have had significant increased stress with using my provider time to understand how the medical reference was referenced. It seems like there was deliberate disregard to social security guidelines. I want to believe it is an honest mistake, but he would know I won't qualify to reapply again. Seems to feel families should bear the financial burden rather than the social security administration. Will use the same work history that gave you enough earning credits as a sword to deny you benefits. My hope is the situation can be remedied with providing additional information. If not, I guess it is why there is judicial review.
Before I read this site, I also found inaccuracies, omissions, wrong provider information & information exclusions to support denial. I have had significant increased stress with using my provider time to understand how the medical reference was referenced. It seems like there was deliberate disregard to social security guidelines. I want to believe it is an honest mistake, but he would know I won't qualify to reapply again. Seems to feel families should bear the financial burden rather than the social security administration. Will use the same work history that gave you enough earning credits as a sword to deny you benefits. My hope is the situation can be remedied with providing additional information. If not, I guess it is why there is judicial review.
Before I read this site, I also found inaccuracies, omissions, wrong provider information & information exclusions to support denial. I have had significant increased stress with using my provider time to understand how the medical reference was referenced. It seems like there was deliberate disregard to social security guidelines. I want to believe it is an honest mistake, but he would know I won't qualify to reapply again. Seems to feel families should bear the financial burden rather than the social security administration. Will use the same work history that gave you enough earning credits as a sword to deny you benefits. My hope is the situation can be remedied with providing additional information. If not, I guess it is why there is judicial review.
I went before this person without an attorney. He was rude to me, would ask questions and not bother to listen to replies. HE LIED and he broke his own Court order. He actually said he thought I tried to commit suicide to receive benefits! He claimed all the years I worked: not enough. Out of 38 years of employment; I did not work 7. I sealed my fate when I answered those two remarks! He is a woman hater. He said I had a Napoleon person! And look who became a judge! I was disabled in 1999; worked full time until 2002. Thomas waited out 4 years, would not go back to starting date. I was owed about 30-40 dollars, never saw a penny. Plus, I was making $22,000.00 yearly when I had accident. Because he waited so long, I get $800.00 a month.
I went before this person without an attorney. He was rude to me, would ask questions and not bother to listen to replies. HE LIED and he broke his own Court order. He actually said he thought I tried to commit suicide to receive benefits! He claimed all the years I worked: not enough. Out of 38 years of employment; I did not work 7. I sealed my fate when I answered those two remarks! He is a woman hater. He said I had a Napoleon person! And look who became a judge! I was disabled in 1999; worked full time until 2002. Thomas waited out 4 years, would not go back to starting date. I was owed about 30-40 dollars, never saw a penny. Plus, I was making $22,000.00 yearly when I had accident. Because he waited so long, I get $800.00 a month.
I went before this person without an attorney. He was rude to me, would ask questions and not bother to listen to replies. HE LIED and he broke his own Court order. He actually said he thought I tried to commit suicide to receive benefits! He claimed all the years I worked: not enough. Out of 38 years of employment; I did not work 7. I sealed my fate when I answered those two remarks! He is a woman hater. He said I had a Napoleon person! And look who became a judge! I was disabled in 1999; worked full time until 2002. Thomas waited out 4 years, would not go back to starting date. I was owed about 30-40 dollars, never saw a penny. Plus, I was making $22,000.00 yearly when I had accident. Because he waited so long, I get $800.00 a month.
This judge picked and choose the medical records he wanted to use. there were updated more accurate medical evidence and there were dismissed. old information from 2yrs ago was used. He did not look at all the evidence presented to him he has denied 58% of his cases this year. he has denied more cases than approved overall
This judge picked and choose the medical records he wanted to use. there were updated more accurate medical evidence and there were dismissed. old information from 2yrs ago was used. He did not look at all the evidence presented to him he has denied 58% of his cases this year. he has denied more cases than approved overall
This judge picked and choose the medical records he wanted to use. there were updated more accurate medical evidence and there were dismissed. old information from 2yrs ago was used. He did not look at all the evidence presented to him he has denied 58% of his cases this year. he has denied more cases than approved overall
My son been sreened by over 30 Doctors, and has been disabled at Birth, and that is written is stone by All the specialist involved , and he stop my son RSDI when my son turned 17 , and plus the county HCAS Raped my other son and it our fault all the harassment and conspiracy to kill my two sons by using the Minneapolis police Department. Yes sir all the corruptions in our Minneapolis nice , he is protecting his friends like its saying bird's of a feather flocks together, I wish my father he is a retired judge was still in office
My son been sreened by over 30 Doctors, and has been disabled at Birth, and that is written is stone by All the specialist involved , and he stop my son RSDI when my son turned 17 , and plus the county HCAS Raped my other son and it our fault all the harassment and conspiracy to kill my two sons by using the Minneapolis police Department. Yes sir all the corruptions in our Minneapolis nice , he is protecting his friends like its saying bird's of a feather flocks together, I wish my father he is a retired judge was still in office
My son been sreened by over 30 Doctors, and has been disabled at Birth, and that is written is stone by All the specialist involved , and he stop my son RSDI when my son turned 17 , and plus the county HCAS Raped my other son and it our fault all the harassment and conspiracy to kill my two sons by using the Minneapolis police Department. Yes sir all the corruptions in our Minneapolis nice , he is protecting his friends like its saying bird's of a feather flocks together, I wish my father he is a retired judge was still in office
Does this Judge have an extension, in which I can leave a voice message, or an email in which to send evidence? I understand an individual has been approved to file an appeal, through the Attorney Fee Branch office in Virginia. It would be so nice to be able to email her the additional evidence. It seems this will be the third appeal for attorney fee's filed with this judge. I have no clue why Judge Sherry D Thompson keeps approving the Fee to Gabriel Dean Johnson of the Fields Law Firm, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The attorney didn't show up in court and was not representing the client. Judge Roger W. Thomas can verify that the attorney whom showed up in court was Michael Graham Schultz. Thank goodness for good honest attorney's. It sure helps practicing law a better place and helps the reputation of the field of law.
Does this Judge have an extension, in which I can leave a voice message, or an email in which to send evidence? I understand an individual has been approved to file an appeal, through the Attorney Fee Branch office in Virginia. It would be so nice to be able to email her the additional evidence. It seems this will be the third appeal for attorney fee's filed with this judge. I have no clue why Judge Sherry D Thompson keeps approving the Fee to Gabriel Dean Johnson of the Fields Law Firm, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The attorney didn't show up in court and was not representing the client. Judge Roger W. Thomas can verify that the attorney whom showed up in court was Michael Graham Schultz. Thank goodness for good honest attorney's. It sure helps practicing law a better place and helps the reputation of the field of law.
Does this Judge have an extension, in which I can leave a voice message, or an email in which to send evidence? I understand an individual has been approved to file an appeal, through the Attorney Fee Branch office in Virginia. It would be so nice to be able to email her the additional evidence. It seems this will be the third appeal for attorney fee's filed with this judge. I have no clue why Judge Sherry D Thompson keeps approving the Fee to Gabriel Dean Johnson of the Fields Law Firm, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The attorney didn't show up in court and was not representing the client. Judge Roger W. Thomas can verify that the attorney whom showed up in court was Michael Graham Schultz. Thank goodness for good honest attorney's. It sure helps practicing law a better place and helps the reputation of the field of law.
Can you explain, without using the word: CORRUPTION, or mentioning crooks, ie Debra Bice, Carolyn Colvin, Sherry Thompson, David Thompson et al., why a 100% Service-Connected DISABLED veteran, who hasn't been gainfully employed since honorable discharge 1987 would be denied ssdi benefits ? Do you think the SSA has more criminals employed than does the VA ? Have you blown the whistle on any of the crooks you see at the SSA ?
Can you explain, without using the word: CORRUPTION, or mentioning crooks, ie Debra Bice, Carolyn Colvin, Sherry Thompson, David Thompson et al., why a 100% Service-Connected DISABLED veteran, who hasn't been gainfully employed since honorable discharge 1987 would be denied ssdi benefits ? Do you think the SSA has more criminals employed than does the VA ? Have you blown the whistle on any of the crooks you see at the SSA ?
Can you explain, without using the word: CORRUPTION, or mentioning crooks, ie Debra Bice, Carolyn Colvin, Sherry Thompson, David Thompson et al., why a 100% Service-Connected DISABLED veteran, who hasn't been gainfully employed since honorable discharge 1987 would be denied ssdi benefits ? Do you think the SSA has more criminals employed than does the VA ? Have you blown the whistle on any of the crooks you see at the SSA ?
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Judge Thomoson, i had written a letter to you within the time limitvabout the attorney fee disagreement. I have not heard back from you, can you please give me an explaination of why you did not do so? My attorney whom I never met until court shows up without all of My medical records and I got very little settlement amount and was charged almost half of my settlement. I really disagree and wish I had gotten my own personal attorney. I did not gey any explaination of how they came up with the amounts which I also wrote in about. I think I'm going to reopen my case since they amended it without giving me numbers. I have children and rent and bills. I e been out of work due to my didabity since February 2014, they amended it to March of 2015. Something is very wrong here. Very unhappy with the way this issue was handeled.
Very fair.
Very fair.
Very fair.
Totally unfit. This judge does not take into account that people have individual limits and not everyone has the same tolerances. he also ignores what doctors say if they use checkbox forms. he misinterprets things ignoring facts presented. id like to see him live my life for a few days. odds are he'd commit suicide within a week which is why id only want him to do it for a few days.
Totally unfit. This judge does not take into account that people have individual limits and not everyone has the same tolerances. he also ignores what doctors say if they use checkbox forms. he misinterprets things ignoring facts presented. id like to see him live my life for a few days. odds are he'd commit suicide within a week which is why id only want him to do it for a few days.
Totally unfit. This judge does not take into account that people have individual limits and not everyone has the same tolerances. he also ignores what doctors say if they use checkbox forms. he misinterprets things ignoring facts presented. id like to see him live my life for a few days. odds are he'd commit suicide within a week which is why id only want him to do it for a few days.
This judge wasn't prepared for my case at all. I was badgered for an hour and a half, and after waiting over 90 days for a decision. I was denied. The denial letter was very back and forth and my 14 year old son picked out all of the things that were in my favor, then they weren't. If you can get a different judge, do so immediately
This judge wasn't prepared for my case at all. I was badgered for an hour and a half, and after waiting over 90 days for a decision. I was denied. The denial letter was very back and forth and my 14 year old son picked out all of the things that were in my favor, then they weren't. If you can get a different judge, do so immediately
This judge wasn't prepared for my case at all. I was badgered for an hour and a half, and after waiting over 90 days for a decision. I was denied. The denial letter was very back and forth and my 14 year old son picked out all of the things that were in my favor, then they weren't. If you can get a different judge, do so immediately
ALJ RICHARD THRASHER was fair, thorough, & very professional. Make sure you have all your medical records up to date & complete. He rules his courtroom w/ a kindness but don't be fooled, he's very astute and perceptive, so remember to come w/ your A-game, meaning be very honest, detailed in your description of your disibility & forthright. ALJ R. THRASHER is a good JUDGE because I believe he cares about those of us who are really disabled.
ALJ RICHARD THRASHER was fair, thorough, & very professional. Make sure you have all your medical records up to date & complete. He rules his courtroom w/ a kindness but don't be fooled, he's very astute and perceptive, so remember to come w/ your A-game, meaning be very honest, detailed in your description of your disibility & forthright. ALJ R. THRASHER is a good JUDGE because I believe he cares about those of us who are really disabled.
ALJ RICHARD THRASHER was fair, thorough, & very professional. Make sure you have all your medical records up to date & complete. He rules his courtroom w/ a kindness but don't be fooled, he's very astute and perceptive, so remember to come w/ your A-game, meaning be very honest, detailed in your description of your disibility & forthright. ALJ R. THRASHER is a good JUDGE because I believe he cares about those of us who are really disabled.
Judge Richard Thrasher discriminates against age and thinks he's a medical expert. He wants to approve date of disability incorrectly and ignored testimony under oath by medical providers and SSA's experts that all identified the correct date of disability and having met the criteria for at least one listing since that date. He didn't want to hear me, only said he was sending questions to another SSA expert of medical field that had no legal reasoning or validity based on SSAs guidelines and the duty of the judge to take the testimony clarifying any questions and only requires the earliest impairment where criteria were met. It was of no relation to the under oath testimony of the impairments that I've met criteria for since the original injury and he further delayed the dire need critical case. You will all hear the truth when he is exposed for all his other wrongdoings to disabled people, especially when his name is publicly named in a wrongful death suit when I stop taking the medications that give me artificial life (and the system prolongs my suffering, my family's suffering) and I go on comfort care and die. When the present SSA experts question why he failed to figure out the wrong date of disability, it's major red flags for everyone.
Judge Richard Thrasher discriminates against age and thinks he's a medical expert. He wants to approve date of disability incorrectly and ignored testimony under oath by medical providers and SSA's experts that all identified the correct date of disability and having met the criteria for at least one listing since that date. He didn't want to hear me, only said he was sending questions to another SSA expert of medical field that had no legal reasoning or validity based on SSAs guidelines and the duty of the judge to take the testimony clarifying any questions and only requires the earliest impairment where criteria were met. It was of no relation to the under oath testimony of the impairments that I've met criteria for since the original injury and he further delayed the dire need critical case. You will all hear the truth when he is exposed for all his other wrongdoings to disabled people, especially when his name is publicly named in a wrongful death suit when I stop taking the medications that give me artificial life (and the system prolongs my suffering, my family's suffering) and I go on comfort care and die. When the present SSA experts question why he failed to figure out the wrong date of disability, it's major red flags for everyone.
Judge Richard Thrasher discriminates against age and thinks he's a medical expert. He wants to approve date of disability incorrectly and ignored testimony under oath by medical providers and SSA's experts that all identified the correct date of disability and having met the criteria for at least one listing since that date. He didn't want to hear me, only said he was sending questions to another SSA expert of medical field that had no legal reasoning or validity based on SSAs guidelines and the duty of the judge to take the testimony clarifying any questions and only requires the earliest impairment where criteria were met. It was of no relation to the under oath testimony of the impairments that I've met criteria for since the original injury and he further delayed the dire need critical case. You will all hear the truth when he is exposed for all his other wrongdoings to disabled people, especially when his name is publicly named in a wrongful death suit when I stop taking the medications that give me artificial life (and the system prolongs my suffering, my family's suffering) and I go on comfort care and die. When the present SSA experts question why he failed to figure out the wrong date of disability, it's major red flags for everyone.
This man must have extreme bias against me in my case. He did nothing short of outright calling me a liar in his most HONORABLE judgement. It seems like nothing that I said was taken into consideration and he even interjected negative thoughts of his own without evidence. I wish he would have come right out and said what was on his mind, that being the system is flawed therefore I take great pride in not telling you my thoughts in court but rather I will be a big man and cut you to ribbons in my mailed response, giving me no ability to respond/defend. If this is all the better and least compassionate judge we have for Social Security we should dump the whole system and start over! If this is the most compassionate judge that we can come up with for people with chronic issues, dump the whole system and start over.
This man must have extreme bias against me in my case. He did nothing short of outright calling me a liar in his most HONORABLE judgement. It seems like nothing that I said was taken into consideration and he even interjected negative thoughts of his own without evidence. I wish he would have come right out and said what was on his mind, that being the system is flawed therefore I take great pride in not telling you my thoughts in court but rather I will be a big man and cut you to ribbons in my mailed response, giving me no ability to respond/defend. If this is all the better and least compassionate judge we have for Social Security we should dump the whole system and start over! If this is the most compassionate judge that we can come up with for people with chronic issues, dump the whole system and start over.
This man must have extreme bias against me in my case. He did nothing short of outright calling me a liar in his most HONORABLE judgement. It seems like nothing that I said was taken into consideration and he even interjected negative thoughts of his own without evidence. I wish he would have come right out and said what was on his mind, that being the system is flawed therefore I take great pride in not telling you my thoughts in court but rather I will be a big man and cut you to ribbons in my mailed response, giving me no ability to respond/defend. If this is all the better and least compassionate judge we have for Social Security we should dump the whole system and start over! If this is the most compassionate judge that we can come up with for people with chronic issues, dump the whole system and start over.
I disagree he assumes to much and if there is doubt he will hold it against you with his version of why he assumes something negative. For example: A client with a roommate are in an ACP program...he assumed they are enrolled to avoid creditors and possibly to hide from the law. Rather than accepting that programs such as this encourage all parties in the shared household to enlist proactively. This client before SSA ruined his life had a 798 FICO score....hardly the type of person who would have to hide from creditors. The client also had no legal issues to fear other than the assumptions of the SSA. He also assumes that SSA will have current up-to-date medical information on-file regarding disability issues when a client has been approved for over 15 years and health issues change and there would be no need to have ongoing medical information on-file after a person has won their disability. So if a concern is not in the file than it is assumed the client is lying about their health (not truly disabled per the Judges assumptions). So say the client has a head injury and that causes seizures which is common. But the head injury is not the reason his disability was approved....than the Judge assumes you are lying because head injury was not listed as the reason for disability being granted?! Oh and how about this...a person who has been a victim of ID theft and fraud...they legally change their name in sealed court but the fact that they have had more than one name makes them a dishonest person...rather than figuring out why they have legally changed their name. These are but a few examples of how this judge screws up .... This Judge is the king of cherry picking facts to fit his case and explaining away any exoneration of contrary evidence as not good enough. Sometimes facts can be used to fit a scenario but they are not telling of the whole truth. Facts can often be molded to fit assumptions. But he can chose to interpret them as he desires because he wears a robe. How about a person with a substantial TBI....often they do not have the ability to recall information or to do so accurately but if you tell this judge anything and it happens to be incorrect than that makes you not credible and a liar (even when non intentional). Often people with moderate head injury will fill in the facts without knowing that things are not completely factual or in order. That is not intentional dishonest but you will never get this judge to agree with that. With TBI a person may not be aware that their version of something isn't in line with other peoples estimate of events.
I disagree he assumes to much and if there is doubt he will hold it against you with his version of why he assumes something negative. For example: A client with a roommate are in an ACP program...he assumed they are enrolled to avoid creditors and possibly to hide from the law. Rather than accepting that programs such as this encourage all parties in the shared household to enlist proactively. This client before SSA ruined his life had a 798 FICO score....hardly the type of person who would have to hide from creditors. The client also had no legal issues to fear other than the assumptions of the SSA. He also assumes that SSA will have current up-to-date medical information on-file regarding disability issues when a client has been approved for over 15 years and health issues change and there would be no need to have ongoing medical information on-file after a person has won their disability. So if a concern is not in the file than it is assumed the client is lying about their health (not truly disabled per the Judges assumptions). So say the client has a head injury and that causes seizures which is common. But the head injury is not the reason his disability was approved....than the Judge assumes you are lying because head injury was not listed as the reason for disability being granted?! Oh and how about this...a person who has been a victim of ID theft and fraud...they legally change their name in sealed court but the fact that they have had more than one name makes them a dishonest person...rather than figuring out why they have legally changed their name. These are but a few examples of how this judge screws up .... This Judge is the king of cherry picking facts to fit his case and explaining away any exoneration of contrary evidence as not good enough. Sometimes facts can be used to fit a scenario but they are not telling of the whole truth. Facts can often be molded to fit assumptions. But he can chose to interpret them as he desires because he wears a robe. How about a person with a substantial TBI....often they do not have the ability to recall information or to do so accurately but if you tell this judge anything and it happens to be incorrect than that makes you not credible and a liar (even when non intentional). Often people with moderate head injury will fill in the facts without knowing that things are not completely factual or in order. That is not intentional dishonest but you will never get this judge to agree with that. With TBI a person may not be aware that their version of something isn't in line with other peoples estimate of events.
I disagree he assumes to much and if there is doubt he will hold it against you with his version of why he assumes something negative. For example: A client with a roommate are in an ACP program...he assumed they are enrolled to avoid creditors and possibly to hide from the law. Rather than accepting that programs such as this encourage all parties in the shared household to enlist proactively. This client before SSA ruined his life had a 798 FICO score....hardly the type of person who would have to hide from creditors. The client also had no legal issues to fear other than the assumptions of the SSA. He also assumes that SSA will have current up-to-date medical information on-file regarding disability issues when a client has been approved for over 15 years and health issues change and there would be no need to have ongoing medical information on-file after a person has won their disability. So if a concern is not in the file than it is assumed the client is lying about their health (not truly disabled per the Judges assumptions). So say the client has a head injury and that causes seizures which is common. But the head injury is not the reason his disability was approved....than the Judge assumes you are lying because head injury was not listed as the reason for disability being granted?! Oh and how about this...a person who has been a victim of ID theft and fraud...they legally change their name in sealed court but the fact that they have had more than one name makes them a dishonest person...rather than figuring out why they have legally changed their name. These are but a few examples of how this judge screws up .... This Judge is the king of cherry picking facts to fit his case and explaining away any exoneration of contrary evidence as not good enough. Sometimes facts can be used to fit a scenario but they are not telling of the whole truth. Facts can often be molded to fit assumptions. But he can chose to interpret them as he desires because he wears a robe. How about a person with a substantial TBI....often they do not have the ability to recall information or to do so accurately but if you tell this judge anything and it happens to be incorrect than that makes you not credible and a liar (even when non intentional). Often people with moderate head injury will fill in the facts without knowing that things are not completely factual or in order. That is not intentional dishonest but you will never get this judge to agree with that. With TBI a person may not be aware that their version of something isn't in line with other peoples estimate of events.
I waited nearly 2-1/2 years before getting a hearing before Judge Thrasher. In the meantime, I had had numerous rounds of physical therapy; back and hip injections; two back surgeries with another pending; and two hip surgeries, the second of which was a total replacement. Not enough time was scheduled for the first hearing, so it was delayed another four months. Information he requested was submitted within 10 days of the first hearing, and I faxed a letter that the information had been submitted, requesting a final hearing date. Less than three weeks later, I received a letter threatening a decision since the information had no been received -- clearly, my letter had not even been read. I was told I could not get another hearing until February, so I responded saying, fine, then go ahead and make the threatened decision so we can move on. That was denied, and a hearing was scheduled for December. At the end of that hearing, he said that he found the initial findings of non-disability were incorrect; but that he would not issue a decision that day. Three months later, with another surgery pending in a few weeks and the very real possibility of losing my apartment (relayed in another letter to the judge), he has yet to write a decision. He is aware I was essentially orphaned before the age of 5 and grew up in foster care and lack a safety net; yet he still fails to act. Perhaps he will finally make a decision after I become homeless and am unreachable.
I waited nearly 2-1/2 years before getting a hearing before Judge Thrasher. In the meantime, I had had numerous rounds of physical therapy; back and hip injections; two back surgeries with another pending; and two hip surgeries, the second of which was a total replacement. Not enough time was scheduled for the first hearing, so it was delayed another four months. Information he requested was submitted within 10 days of the first hearing, and I faxed a letter that the information had been submitted, requesting a final hearing date. Less than three weeks later, I received a letter threatening a decision since the information had no been received -- clearly, my letter had not even been read. I was told I could not get another hearing until February, so I responded saying, fine, then go ahead and make the threatened decision so we can move on. That was denied, and a hearing was scheduled for December. At the end of that hearing, he said that he found the initial findings of non-disability were incorrect; but that he would not issue a decision that day. Three months later, with another surgery pending in a few weeks and the very real possibility of losing my apartment (relayed in another letter to the judge), he has yet to write a decision. He is aware I was essentially orphaned before the age of 5 and grew up in foster care and lack a safety net; yet he still fails to act. Perhaps he will finally make a decision after I become homeless and am unreachable.
I waited nearly 2-1/2 years before getting a hearing before Judge Thrasher. In the meantime, I had had numerous rounds of physical therapy; back and hip injections; two back surgeries with another pending; and two hip surgeries, the second of which was a total replacement. Not enough time was scheduled for the first hearing, so it was delayed another four months. Information he requested was submitted within 10 days of the first hearing, and I faxed a letter that the information had been submitted, requesting a final hearing date. Less than three weeks later, I received a letter threatening a decision since the information had no been received -- clearly, my letter had not even been read. I was told I could not get another hearing until February, so I responded saying, fine, then go ahead and make the threatened decision so we can move on. That was denied, and a hearing was scheduled for December. At the end of that hearing, he said that he found the initial findings of non-disability were incorrect; but that he would not issue a decision that day. Three months later, with another surgery pending in a few weeks and the very real possibility of losing my apartment (relayed in another letter to the judge), he has yet to write a decision. He is aware I was essentially orphaned before the age of 5 and grew up in foster care and lack a safety net; yet he still fails to act. Perhaps he will finally make a decision after I become homeless and am unreachable.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
I had Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher and my Lawyers Hoglund and Mrozik drop the ball, I had 2 Senators step in and got my hearing expedited cause my lawyers didn't have the paperwork in that was needed for my hearing in Oct and I didn't have proper directions to court building, since I am unfamiliar with area, I was late , So then Honorable Richard Thrasher rescheduled my hearing for March, when I learn the news about the paperwork that was needed. It took me all of 10 minutes of talking to the medical professionals in person to get it. But I still had to wait until March, After Everything was done. Honorable Judge Richard Thrasher fully Realized and approved my SSI.
First I do understand how a judge's job would be very difficult but I do not always believe them to be fair. Some are, some not so much. They are human and can be bent by feelings rather than facts. They can be guilty of jumping to conclusions despite their training and education. I had a Judge named Thrasher. He and their attorney Peter Johnson ignored evidence that someone had misused my SSN/DOB/name and that was part of why I was dealing with him in the first place. thewy even ignored the neurology diagnosis of TBI. I had been accused of fraud which had nothing to do with me but had to do with misuse of my information, which I told him in person (I had a completely useless lawyer named Paul Onkka -total joke washed up junkie). I even backed my claim up with a few verifiable reports (police and so forth). Basically I was on my own with a head injury trying to fight this legal system (impossible task in my shoes --very unfair). The system failed me clearly. I should have been absolved of any wrong doing and reinstated immediately. This judge made a deliberate choice to explain away the evidence I provided and still called me guilty of the assumptions. He took cracks at my character which I though was uncalled for, as well as untrue. I could prove his statements untrue. It took less than 4 months to get a hearing that allowed them to charge me 18K and take away my benefits and basically place my life into ruins. It has taken me more than 5 years to get anything back and I still haven't had face time with a Judge. I will never get everything back. I now have damage to deal with for life based on the assumptions that were never true. Real justice would allow me to sue over it. These people handled it badly and did so with some degree of malice, IMO. Intent might be more clear with all the facts out to be seen. I am now involved with a more reputable attorney. Second, I recall him making some off-the-cuff remark about my issues being depression and seizures. I had a vocorder for memory because of the TBI during my 'court session'. Well I never lied to anyone, I assume I was mis-diagnosed with depression based upon similar symptoms Asperger's can be mistaken as depression (blunt affect, lack of typical interest in social shit). The other issue I can't fake seizures, the EEG says they are there in REM sleep, to assume I am lying about a head injury because it isn't listed as the original reason I was approve decades ago is a bit questionable. To accuse me of any wrong doing on the records in your files is really outrageous since I have no input into what medical records you collect or what providers have placed there. My hands never touched any of that as is the way you do business. But I am assumed at fault somehow?! For the record, normal people who do not have brain damages --generally do not suffer seizures, so such an assertion is asinine. If people have seizures they obviously have damage and any fool would know that. No medical degree is needed to figure that out. Yes maybe the reasons I should have been approved should have been listed as TBI or OBD but I had no part in how those issues were documented medically nor how the original Judge wrote this up. I certainly haven't lied/malingered or any other disreputable act that I have been accused of. Regardless, I still have a TBI and the seizures are part of that issue. Because they happen in sleep cycle I am not going to remember anything about them and that is common sense! To accuse me of lying over such crap is again questionable. Still happen to be disabled regardless of your assumptions. How I can be blamed and held to standards for any of thee above.... is absurd and very questionable from a legal standpoint. So to drill this down YOU DID A HALF-ASS JOB for JUDGE (especially one with so many years experience) and I consider you very dishonest in your tactics. Yes, you saw facts but you assigned them value rather than asking me for relevant background on things that were not clear. There are days I wish my brain were more consistent because I feel I could have done your job better than you did and given your yearly salary-- I could have done your job cheaper too. I still question the tactics taken in my case by the SSA. Ridiculous! You dishonor the agency you work for with your shoddy work ethics. Shame on YOU.
First I do understand how a judge's job would be very difficult but I do not always believe them to be fair. Some are, some not so much. They are human and can be bent by feelings rather than facts. They can be guilty of jumping to conclusions despite their training and education. I had a Judge named Thrasher. He and their attorney Peter Johnson ignored evidence that someone had misused my SSN/DOB/name and that was part of why I was dealing with him in the first place. thewy even ignored the neurology diagnosis of TBI. I had been accused of fraud which had nothing to do with me but had to do with misuse of my information, which I told him in person (I had a completely useless lawyer named Paul Onkka -total joke washed up junkie). I even backed my claim up with a few verifiable reports (police and so forth). Basically I was on my own with a head injury trying to fight this legal system (impossible task in my shoes --very unfair). The system failed me clearly. I should have been absolved of any wrong doing and reinstated immediately. This judge made a deliberate choice to explain away the evidence I provided and still called me guilty of the assumptions. He took cracks at my character which I though was uncalled for, as well as untrue. I could prove his statements untrue. It took less than 4 months to get a hearing that allowed them to charge me 18K and take away my benefits and basically place my life into ruins. It has taken me more than 5 years to get anything back and I still haven't had face time with a Judge. I will never get everything back. I now have damage to deal with for life based on the assumptions that were never true. Real justice would allow me to sue over it. These people handled it badly and did so with some degree of malice, IMO. Intent might be more clear with all the facts out to be seen. I am now involved with a more reputable attorney. Second, I recall him making some off-the-cuff remark about my issues being depression and seizures. I had a vocorder for memory because of the TBI during my 'court session'. Well I never lied to anyone, I assume I was mis-diagnosed with depression based upon similar symptoms Asperger's can be mistaken as depression (blunt affect, lack of typical interest in social shit). The other issue I can't fake seizures, the EEG says they are there in REM sleep, to assume I am lying about a head injury because it isn't listed as the original reason I was approve decades ago is a bit questionable. To accuse me of any wrong doing on the records in your files is really outrageous since I have no input into what medical records you collect or what providers have placed there. My hands never touched any of that as is the way you do business. But I am assumed at fault somehow?! For the record, normal people who do not have brain damages --generally do not suffer seizures, so such an assertion is asinine. If people have seizures they obviously have damage and any fool would know that. No medical degree is needed to figure that out. Yes maybe the reasons I should have been approved should have been listed as TBI or OBD but I had no part in how those issues were documented medically nor how the original Judge wrote this up. I certainly haven't lied/malingered or any other disreputable act that I have been accused of. Regardless, I still have a TBI and the seizures are part of that issue. Because they happen in sleep cycle I am not going to remember anything about them and that is common sense! To accuse me of lying over such crap is again questionable. Still happen to be disabled regardless of your assumptions. How I can be blamed and held to standards for any of thee above.... is absurd and very questionable from a legal standpoint. So to drill this down YOU DID A HALF-ASS JOB for JUDGE (especially one with so many years experience) and I consider you very dishonest in your tactics. Yes, you saw facts but you assigned them value rather than asking me for relevant background on things that were not clear. There are days I wish my brain were more consistent because I feel I could have done your job better than you did and given your yearly salary-- I could have done your job cheaper too. I still question the tactics taken in my case by the SSA. Ridiculous! You dishonor the agency you work for with your shoddy work ethics. Shame on YOU.
First I do understand how a judge's job would be very difficult but I do not always believe them to be fair. Some are, some not so much. They are human and can be bent by feelings rather than facts. They can be guilty of jumping to conclusions despite their training and education. I had a Judge named Thrasher. He and their attorney Peter Johnson ignored evidence that someone had misused my SSN/DOB/name and that was part of why I was dealing with him in the first place. thewy even ignored the neurology diagnosis of TBI. I had been accused of fraud which had nothing to do with me but had to do with misuse of my information, which I told him in person (I had a completely useless lawyer named Paul Onkka -total joke washed up junkie). I even backed my claim up with a few verifiable reports (police and so forth). Basically I was on my own with a head injury trying to fight this legal system (impossible task in my shoes --very unfair). The system failed me clearly. I should have been absolved of any wrong doing and reinstated immediately. This judge made a deliberate choice to explain away the evidence I provided and still called me guilty of the assumptions. He took cracks at my character which I though was uncalled for, as well as untrue. I could prove his statements untrue. It took less than 4 months to get a hearing that allowed them to charge me 18K and take away my benefits and basically place my life into ruins. It has taken me more than 5 years to get anything back and I still haven't had face time with a Judge. I will never get everything back. I now have damage to deal with for life based on the assumptions that were never true. Real justice would allow me to sue over it. These people handled it badly and did so with some degree of malice, IMO. Intent might be more clear with all the facts out to be seen. I am now involved with a more reputable attorney. Second, I recall him making some off-the-cuff remark about my issues being depression and seizures. I had a vocorder for memory because of the TBI during my 'court session'. Well I never lied to anyone, I assume I was mis-diagnosed with depression based upon similar symptoms Asperger's can be mistaken as depression (blunt affect, lack of typical interest in social shit). The other issue I can't fake seizures, the EEG says they are there in REM sleep, to assume I am lying about a head injury because it isn't listed as the original reason I was approve decades ago is a bit questionable. To accuse me of any wrong doing on the records in your files is really outrageous since I have no input into what medical records you collect or what providers have placed there. My hands never touched any of that as is the way you do business. But I am assumed at fault somehow?! For the record, normal people who do not have brain damages --generally do not suffer seizures, so such an assertion is asinine. If people have seizures they obviously have damage and any fool would know that. No medical degree is needed to figure that out. Yes maybe the reasons I should have been approved should have been listed as TBI or OBD but I had no part in how those issues were documented medically nor how the original Judge wrote this up. I certainly haven't lied/malingered or any other disreputable act that I have been accused of. Regardless, I still have a TBI and the seizures are part of that issue. Because they happen in sleep cycle I am not going to remember anything about them and that is common sense! To accuse me of lying over such crap is again questionable. Still happen to be disabled regardless of your assumptions. How I can be blamed and held to standards for any of thee above.... is absurd and very questionable from a legal standpoint. So to drill this down YOU DID A HALF-ASS JOB for JUDGE (especially one with so many years experience) and I consider you very dishonest in your tactics. Yes, you saw facts but you assigned them value rather than asking me for relevant background on things that were not clear. There are days I wish my brain were more consistent because I feel I could have done your job better than you did and given your yearly salary-- I could have done your job cheaper too. I still question the tactics taken in my case by the SSA. Ridiculous! You dishonor the agency you work for with your shoddy work ethics. Shame on YOU.
My experience with her was unbelievable. She was deceitful with her decisions, making up evidence to "support" her verdict, assuming that there was no one who would verify her evidence. My wife's case dragged on for 9 years. When we appealed her first denial, the case was remanded back to her stating that Townsend-Anderson's decision was not supported by the evidence. The second hearing, my wife's lawyer totally took apart Townsend-Anderson's case; I still have it on cd. Townsend-Anderson again denied my wife using as her supporting evidence things that never happened meaning that she was making up evidence to strengthen her case. We appealed again and this time it was denied. My wife's lawyer quit at that time saying she didn't handle cases in federal court. She did however refer us to a lawyer in Chicago. When I talked to him, he said, don't bother, you'll just be wasting the filing fee as word has come from Washington to deny everyone appealing in a federal court. The pathetic thing is Townsend-Anderson offered to give my wife benefits, after her case was remanded, if my wife agreed to start her benefits in 2007 instead of 2003. My wife would have accepted but her lawyer found out the latest the offer could start was 2005 and Townsend-Anderson wouldn't start the benefits from then. I talked to 3 other lawyers and no one would help. Townsend-Anderson knew my wife had a legitimate disability or else she would have never made an offer to settle, but didn't want to pay out any earlier than 2007, so instead she denied. What a country. Deceitful people prosper and honest people suffer. On a final note, one of Townsend-Anderson's premises was that all the experts that we had testify for my wife, she stated that they felt sorry for my wife and their testimony can't be relied on. Those people would be expert witnesses in any courtroom. These were all professionals. My personal opinion is that she didn't like my wife's lawyer and took out her hatred on my wife. From what I've seen, it is not what you have for a disability, but who you draw as a judge. With the right judge, you can get your benefits with 1 page of evidence. My wife had more than a person should need, but got railroaded. The system failed which gives a person the power to abuse their position and make up enough evidence to support a wrong decision. How can she sleep at night?
My experience with her was unbelievable. She was deceitful with her decisions, making up evidence to "support" her verdict, assuming that there was no one who would verify her evidence. My wife's case dragged on for 9 years. When we appealed her first denial, the case was remanded back to her stating that Townsend-Anderson's decision was not supported by the evidence. The second hearing, my wife's lawyer totally took apart Townsend-Anderson's case; I still have it on cd. Townsend-Anderson again denied my wife using as her supporting evidence things that never happened meaning that she was making up evidence to strengthen her case. We appealed again and this time it was denied. My wife's lawyer quit at that time saying she didn't handle cases in federal court. She did however refer us to a lawyer in Chicago. When I talked to him, he said, don't bother, you'll just be wasting the filing fee as word has come from Washington to deny everyone appealing in a federal court. The pathetic thing is Townsend-Anderson offered to give my wife benefits, after her case was remanded, if my wife agreed to start her benefits in 2007 instead of 2003. My wife would have accepted but her lawyer found out the latest the offer could start was 2005 and Townsend-Anderson wouldn't start the benefits from then. I talked to 3 other lawyers and no one would help. Townsend-Anderson knew my wife had a legitimate disability or else she would have never made an offer to settle, but didn't want to pay out any earlier than 2007, so instead she denied. What a country. Deceitful people prosper and honest people suffer. On a final note, one of Townsend-Anderson's premises was that all the experts that we had testify for my wife, she stated that they felt sorry for my wife and their testimony can't be relied on. Those people would be expert witnesses in any courtroom. These were all professionals. My personal opinion is that she didn't like my wife's lawyer and took out her hatred on my wife. From what I've seen, it is not what you have for a disability, but who you draw as a judge. With the right judge, you can get your benefits with 1 page of evidence. My wife had more than a person should need, but got railroaded. The system failed which gives a person the power to abuse their position and make up enough evidence to support a wrong decision. How can she sleep at night?
My experience with her was unbelievable. She was deceitful with her decisions, making up evidence to "support" her verdict, assuming that there was no one who would verify her evidence. My wife's case dragged on for 9 years. When we appealed her first denial, the case was remanded back to her stating that Townsend-Anderson's decision was not supported by the evidence. The second hearing, my wife's lawyer totally took apart Townsend-Anderson's case; I still have it on cd. Townsend-Anderson again denied my wife using as her supporting evidence things that never happened meaning that she was making up evidence to strengthen her case. We appealed again and this time it was denied. My wife's lawyer quit at that time saying she didn't handle cases in federal court. She did however refer us to a lawyer in Chicago. When I talked to him, he said, don't bother, you'll just be wasting the filing fee as word has come from Washington to deny everyone appealing in a federal court. The pathetic thing is Townsend-Anderson offered to give my wife benefits, after her case was remanded, if my wife agreed to start her benefits in 2007 instead of 2003. My wife would have accepted but her lawyer found out the latest the offer could start was 2005 and Townsend-Anderson wouldn't start the benefits from then. I talked to 3 other lawyers and no one would help. Townsend-Anderson knew my wife had a legitimate disability or else she would have never made an offer to settle, but didn't want to pay out any earlier than 2007, so instead she denied. What a country. Deceitful people prosper and honest people suffer. On a final note, one of Townsend-Anderson's premises was that all the experts that we had testify for my wife, she stated that they felt sorry for my wife and their testimony can't be relied on. Those people would be expert witnesses in any courtroom. These were all professionals. My personal opinion is that she didn't like my wife's lawyer and took out her hatred on my wife. From what I've seen, it is not what you have for a disability, but who you draw as a judge. With the right judge, you can get your benefits with 1 page of evidence. My wife had more than a person should need, but got railroaded. The system failed which gives a person the power to abuse their position and make up enough evidence to support a wrong decision. How can she sleep at night?
I concur with the above opinion. This judge is obviously biased. She cited the fact that I am collecting disability from another source as evidence I am malingering / disincentivized to work?! What?! It should be some evidence that I am disabled. What a dingbat. None of my witnesses were allowed. Apparently I, and ALL of my doctors, are liars. My case has been going on since 2011. I think someone once said its foolish to believe everyone, but something far worse to believe no-one. I almost feel sorry for this judge.
I concur with the above opinion. This judge is obviously biased. She cited the fact that I am collecting disability from another source as evidence I am malingering / disincentivized to work?! What?! It should be some evidence that I am disabled. What a dingbat. None of my witnesses were allowed. Apparently I, and ALL of my doctors, are liars. My case has been going on since 2011. I think someone once said its foolish to believe everyone, but something far worse to believe no-one. I almost feel sorry for this judge.
I concur with the above opinion. This judge is obviously biased. She cited the fact that I am collecting disability from another source as evidence I am malingering / disincentivized to work?! What?! It should be some evidence that I am disabled. What a dingbat. None of my witnesses were allowed. Apparently I, and ALL of my doctors, are liars. My case has been going on since 2011. I think someone once said its foolish to believe everyone, but something far worse to believe no-one. I almost feel sorry for this judge.
Excellent, understanding, empathetic judge who listens and cares about the person.
Excellent, understanding, empathetic judge who listens and cares about the person.
Excellent, understanding, empathetic judge who listens and cares about the person.
As someone who has brought cases before him many times in the past, I can attest that Judge Washington is indeed a very fine jurist and a compassionate man. One of the best I've come across.
As someone who has brought cases before him many times in the past, I can attest that Judge Washington is indeed a very fine jurist and a compassionate man. One of the best I've come across.
As someone who has brought cases before him many times in the past, I can attest that Judge Washington is indeed a very fine jurist and a compassionate man. One of the best I've come across.
On 9/18/2013 i went before this judge. As i set in lobby and watched people come out that showed no signs of Disabilty get approved. Then when it came to me, the only black man i was denied. I wasn't in the court room 5 minutes before he made his decision. Though i walked with cane, shower true signs he denied me and only me based on the fact that i didn't continue to seek medical . Though he was fully aware that i had sought free medical for years not hadn't recieved it do to my wifes income. Though my wife worked, she had to pay rent,bills and feed and clothes 4 children on her own while putting one through medical school. We just couldn't afford to pay for my medical. I went before this man with a number of doctor statements to proved my disability he only looked at the 2 that disagreed. He himself even sent me to a doctor that brung back results of damage to lower and upper back strain while anoth doctor confirmed it's findings.
On 9/18/2013 i went before this judge. As i set in lobby and watched people come out that showed no signs of Disabilty get approved. Then when it came to me, the only black man i was denied. I wasn't in the court room 5 minutes before he made his decision. Though i walked with cane, shower true signs he denied me and only me based on the fact that i didn't continue to seek medical . Though he was fully aware that i had sought free medical for years not hadn't recieved it do to my wifes income. Though my wife worked, she had to pay rent,bills and feed and clothes 4 children on her own while putting one through medical school. We just couldn't afford to pay for my medical. I went before this man with a number of doctor statements to proved my disability he only looked at the 2 that disagreed. He himself even sent me to a doctor that brung back results of damage to lower and upper back strain while anoth doctor confirmed it's findings.
On 9/18/2013 i went before this judge. As i set in lobby and watched people come out that showed no signs of Disabilty get approved. Then when it came to me, the only black man i was denied. I wasn't in the court room 5 minutes before he made his decision. Though i walked with cane, shower true signs he denied me and only me based on the fact that i didn't continue to seek medical . Though he was fully aware that i had sought free medical for years not hadn't recieved it do to my wifes income. Though my wife worked, she had to pay rent,bills and feed and clothes 4 children on her own while putting one through medical school. We just couldn't afford to pay for my medical. I went before this man with a number of doctor statements to proved my disability he only looked at the 2 that disagreed. He himself even sent me to a doctor that brung back results of damage to lower and upper back strain while anoth doctor confirmed it's findings.
Continued from other post: i truly believe that this judge showed racism in reverse. Though even the vocation expert said that with me walking with cane had no jobs for me you still denied the only black man that came before you while you approved all white people that showed no signs of Disabilty. I've worked my whole life. Yet now I've lost everything. Home, car, freedoms that i worked so hard for. Now I'm homeless and have nothing. Thank you judge thank you for ruining the rest of my life. For ruining my kids life and leaving us with nothing thank you
Continued from other post: i truly believe that this judge showed racism in reverse. Though even the vocation expert said that with me walking with cane had no jobs for me you still denied the only black man that came before you while you approved all white people that showed no signs of Disabilty. I've worked my whole life. Yet now I've lost everything. Home, car, freedoms that i worked so hard for. Now I'm homeless and have nothing. Thank you judge thank you for ruining the rest of my life. For ruining my kids life and leaving us with nothing thank you
Continued from other post: i truly believe that this judge showed racism in reverse. Though even the vocation expert said that with me walking with cane had no jobs for me you still denied the only black man that came before you while you approved all white people that showed no signs of Disabilty. I've worked my whole life. Yet now I've lost everything. Home, car, freedoms that i worked so hard for. Now I'm homeless and have nothing. Thank you judge thank you for ruining the rest of my life. For ruining my kids life and leaving us with nothing thank you
Judge Wheatley, I completely disagree with your decision because 1. I have seizures and that' what makes me collapse, cause problems and pass out when I get older in my 60's. Besides I'm too slow to work and I have trouble memorizing/remembering what I'm suppose to do at any operation position employers offer me to work at.
Judge Wheatley, I completely disagree with your decision because 1. I have seizures and that' what makes me collapse, cause problems and pass out when I get older in my 60's. Besides I'm too slow to work and I have trouble memorizing/remembering what I'm suppose to do at any operation position employers offer me to work at.
Judge Wheatley, I completely disagree with your decision because 1. I have seizures and that' what makes me collapse, cause problems and pass out when I get older in my 60's. Besides I'm too slow to work and I have trouble memorizing/remembering what I'm suppose to do at any operation position employers offer me to work at.
Judge Wheatley is very nice in person but his first decision was harsh but at that time I had no insurance and therefore no personal doctors' opinions. At the second hearing with him he was again very personable but stern. He had 3 experts to testify at my hearing but once he heard the first two, together with the Soc Sec dept.'s doctors' examination reports (I did 2), all four of their doctors said I was disabled. He approved my case from the bench. He did not talk to me at all except to swear me in. So I believe once he had the actual opinions from my doctors (which I was able to get with medi-cal) and their 4, he did the right thing.
Judge Wheatley is very nice in person but his first decision was harsh but at that time I had no insurance and therefore no personal doctors' opinions. At the second hearing with him he was again very personable but stern. He had 3 experts to testify at my hearing but once he heard the first two, together with the Soc Sec dept.'s doctors' examination reports (I did 2), all four of their doctors said I was disabled. He approved my case from the bench. He did not talk to me at all except to swear me in. So I believe once he had the actual opinions from my doctors (which I was able to get with medi-cal) and their 4, he did the right thing.
Judge Wheatley is very nice in person but his first decision was harsh but at that time I had no insurance and therefore no personal doctors' opinions. At the second hearing with him he was again very personable but stern. He had 3 experts to testify at my hearing but once he heard the first two, together with the Soc Sec dept.'s doctors' examination reports (I did 2), all four of their doctors said I was disabled. He approved my case from the bench. He did not talk to me at all except to swear me in. So I believe once he had the actual opinions from my doctors (which I was able to get with medi-cal) and their 4, he did the right thing.