NHC-CHICAGO, Illinois Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Nhc-chicago, ILLINOIS, 24 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Nhc-chicago, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 14.5 months. The average case processing time in Nhc-chicago is 525 days. The Nhc-chicago average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 42%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Nhc-chicago ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHC CHICAGO | 24 | 14.5 months | 525 days | 0.0 | 19% | 42% | 39% |
| ILLINOIS | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.50 months | 525 days | 3246 | 3284 | 3176 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 37
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary F Withum | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Helen Valkavich | 43% | 17% | 39% |
| Deanna L Sokolski | 36% | 28% | 36% |
| David Skidmore | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Anne Sharrard | 36% | 22% | 42% |
| Kathleen Scully-Hayes | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Thomas J Sanzi | 23% | 23% | 54% |
| James Satterwhite | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Martha R Reeves | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mary Ann Poulose | 30% | 17% | 53% |
| John Pope | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John S Pope | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Beverly S Parkhurst | 46% | 20% | 34% |
| Patrick Nagle | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kim Soo Nagle | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ayrie Moore | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Shirley M Michaelson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sylke Merchan | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael R McGuire | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Denise M Martin | 41% | 19% | 40% |
| John Martin | 48% | 19% | 33% |
| Curt Marceille | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Lorenzo Level | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Rebecca LaRiccia | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Henry Kramzyk | 27% | 16% | 57% |
| William J King | 45% | 24% | 31% |
| Jessica Inouye | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Theodore W Grippo | 28% | 26% | 46% |
| Paul Gaughen | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| David K Gatto | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ollie Garmon | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| George Gaffaney | 42% | 20% | 39% |
| George M Gaffaney | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Myriam C Fernandez Rice | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sr. Donovan | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sandra R DiMaggio Wallis | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Paul R Armstrong | 37% | 18% | 45% |
924 Comments
If you're less than 50, stay home. You don't have a chance.
If you're less than 50, stay home. You don't have a chance.
If you're less than 50, stay home. You don't have a chance.
Iam over 50 and I got denied.i heard if you get Armstrong you will get denied I got Armstrong and I got denied, he lived up to his reputation as far as I can see.I have no ideal how I will survive are if I will
Iam over 50 and I got denied.i heard if you get Armstrong you will get denied I got Armstrong and I got denied, he lived up to his reputation as far as I can see.I have no ideal how I will survive are if I will
Iam over 50 and I got denied.i heard if you get Armstrong you will get denied I got Armstrong and I got denied, he lived up to his reputation as far as I can see.I have no ideal how I will survive are if I will
He had his mind made up before the hearing approval rating nation wide 62% at a hearing. My God Armstrong's is 15% I had no chance at all. KY quit hearings here and now are run video from Chicago he compared my problems with a different case all together. 28 months of waiting for this I am applying on my own again and turning in everything i possibly can and hope i never have to see another one of these judges again. I am losing my place to live being evicted from the land i rent to put my mobile home on my landlord will take it he knows i can't afford to move it, everythings being turned off. Me and my kids will be on the street my x husband has stage 3 cancer no child support he can't work. I hope this judge feels the pain i do right now it would kill him to be where i'm at he couldn't handle it.
He had his mind made up before the hearing approval rating nation wide 62% at a hearing. My God Armstrong's is 15% I had no chance at all. KY quit hearings here and now are run video from Chicago he compared my problems with a different case all together. 28 months of waiting for this I am applying on my own again and turning in everything i possibly can and hope i never have to see another one of these judges again. I am losing my place to live being evicted from the land i rent to put my mobile home on my landlord will take it he knows i can't afford to move it, everythings being turned off. Me and my kids will be on the street my x husband has stage 3 cancer no child support he can't work. I hope this judge feels the pain i do right now it would kill him to be where i'm at he couldn't handle it.
He had his mind made up before the hearing approval rating nation wide 62% at a hearing. My God Armstrong's is 15% I had no chance at all. KY quit hearings here and now are run video from Chicago he compared my problems with a different case all together. 28 months of waiting for this I am applying on my own again and turning in everything i possibly can and hope i never have to see another one of these judges again. I am losing my place to live being evicted from the land i rent to put my mobile home on my landlord will take it he knows i can't afford to move it, everythings being turned off. Me and my kids will be on the street my x husband has stage 3 cancer no child support he can't work. I hope this judge feels the pain i do right now it would kill him to be where i'm at he couldn't handle it.
He is an awesome judge and my case is not even decided on.
He is an awesome judge and my case is not even decided on.
He is an awesome judge and my case is not even decided on.
according to a detailed proposal drafted by administrative law judge Paul R. Armstrong and shared with the Washington Examiner. Among the proposed reforms: Disability rulings are currently for life, and can be revoked only if the case is one of the tiny and shrinking fraction to receive a follow-up audit by the Social Security Administration. The applicants are often people as young as in their 20s, who have never worked and for whom a determination of disability can mean nearly a half-century of guaranteed government payments. Under this new proposed status, Armstrong writes, "disability benefits would automatically be cut off for such beneficiary at a certain date set out in the disability order," with the burden of proof being on the recipient to extend it, rather than on the SSA to prove it's not needed, as it stands now. "The system fails to refer current applicants to resources created for their benefit, especially the federal-state Vocational Rehabilitation System, prior to the determination of their disability status," Armstrong notes. * Have a taxpayer advocate in the hearings, not just a one-sided hearing with a client's lawyer or representative. Not having a hearing akin to a trial with no defense counsel present would also help keep those seeking disability payments from wantonly lying without fear of consequence, because they would be grilled in a cross-examination. shared with the Washington Examiner
according to a detailed proposal drafted by administrative law judge Paul R. Armstrong and shared with the Washington Examiner. Among the proposed reforms: Disability rulings are currently for life, and can be revoked only if the case is one of the tiny and shrinking fraction to receive a follow-up audit by the Social Security Administration. The applicants are often people as young as in their 20s, who have never worked and for whom a determination of disability can mean nearly a half-century of guaranteed government payments. Under this new proposed status, Armstrong writes, "disability benefits would automatically be cut off for such beneficiary at a certain date set out in the disability order," with the burden of proof being on the recipient to extend it, rather than on the SSA to prove it's not needed, as it stands now. "The system fails to refer current applicants to resources created for their benefit, especially the federal-state Vocational Rehabilitation System, prior to the determination of their disability status," Armstrong notes. * Have a taxpayer advocate in the hearings, not just a one-sided hearing with a client's lawyer or representative. Not having a hearing akin to a trial with no defense counsel present would also help keep those seeking disability payments from wantonly lying without fear of consequence, because they would be grilled in a cross-examination. shared with the Washington Examiner
according to a detailed proposal drafted by administrative law judge Paul R. Armstrong and shared with the Washington Examiner. Among the proposed reforms: Disability rulings are currently for life, and can be revoked only if the case is one of the tiny and shrinking fraction to receive a follow-up audit by the Social Security Administration. The applicants are often people as young as in their 20s, who have never worked and for whom a determination of disability can mean nearly a half-century of guaranteed government payments. Under this new proposed status, Armstrong writes, "disability benefits would automatically be cut off for such beneficiary at a certain date set out in the disability order," with the burden of proof being on the recipient to extend it, rather than on the SSA to prove it's not needed, as it stands now. "The system fails to refer current applicants to resources created for their benefit, especially the federal-state Vocational Rehabilitation System, prior to the determination of their disability status," Armstrong notes. * Have a taxpayer advocate in the hearings, not just a one-sided hearing with a client's lawyer or representative. Not having a hearing akin to a trial with no defense counsel present would also help keep those seeking disability payments from wantonly lying without fear of consequence, because they would be grilled in a cross-examination. shared with the Washington Examiner
according to a detailed proposal drafted by administrative law judge Paul R. Armstrong and shared with the Washington Examiner. Among the proposed reforms: Disability rulings are currently for life, and can be revoked only if the case is one of the tiny and shrinking fraction to receive a follow-up audit by the Social Security Administration. The applicants are often people as young as in their 20s, who have never worked and for whom a determination of disability can mean nearly a half-century of guaranteed government payments. Under this new proposed status, Armstrong writes, "disability benefits would automatically be cut off for such beneficiary at a certain date set out in the disability order," with the burden of proof being on the recipient to extend it, rather than on the SSA to prove it's not needed, as it stands now. "The system fails to refer current applicants to resources created for their benefit, especially the federal-state Vocational Rehabilitation System, prior to the determination of their disability status," Armstrong notes. * Have a taxpayer advocate in the hearings, not just a one-sided hearing with a client's lawyer or representative. Not having a hearing akin to a trial with no defense counsel present would also help keep those seeking disability payments from wantonly lying without fear of consequence, because they would be grilled in a cross-examination. shared with the Washington Examiner
I went in to my hearing expecting the worst, but Judge Armstrong listened to my case and quickly understood why I could not work. I am only 32 years old battling heart issues and he understood this, when the lower levels of the process did not.
I went in to my hearing expecting the worst, but Judge Armstrong listened to my case and quickly understood why I could not work. I am only 32 years old battling heart issues and he understood this, when the lower levels of the process did not.
I went in to my hearing expecting the worst, but Judge Armstrong listened to my case and quickly understood why I could not work. I am only 32 years old battling heart issues and he understood this, when the lower levels of the process did not.
O.K. This is my second attempt to share my comments about Judge Armstrong. Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
O.K. This is my second attempt to share my comments about Judge Armstrong. Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
O.K. This is my second attempt to share my comments about Judge Armstrong. Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
Before my hearing my lawyer had me so stressed, I took triple my stress medication. He told me not to say anything only yes or no to any question, let him do the talking. So I guess it was my fault I was denied. Judge Armstrong was such a Gentleman, I answered all questions he asked. I do not remember much of my hearing but when someone treats me as a person and not just a number. I respect that person. YES my case was denied, I have appealed. I feel my case was not presented properly. I did not get to see what my lawyer presented before hand. a lot of what was presented was wrong. He did not put my new Doctors diagnosis. So if I lose this I will file again WITHOUT A LAWYER. Thanks.....
Don't be fooled by this judge's pleasant demeanor. He's no-nonsense, but will treat you nicely. But. This is a judge who believes that most people who are disabled are trying to game the system and just want a way to take an early retirement. If you have lived a decent, law-abiding, hard-working, middle-class life, getting disability is no fun pay day. You aren't getting to live high on the hog. It allows you to eat. That's pretty much it. If he bothered looking at the whole person, what kind of life they led, the kind of work they did, what is preventing them from doing so now, he'd see that most people aren't just burger flippers or factory workers on their feet whose vague claims of back pain seek to get them out of a hard-working, low pay existence. Many of us loved our jobs and never wanted to stop. We were paid well and led middle-class lives. We would not seek disability unless our pain and conditions made working unbearable. If you are being treated by doctors and specialists, and are on heavy pain meds; have given up your good life and existed in relative poverty, waiting to be awarded a pittance so you can now just put enough food on your table, this judge, like a certain percentage, should, take this into account, but don't. Compassion is left at the door. It should not be the overwhelming criteria that decides cases, but a modicum of human decency, when recognized, can help make a difference if he and others of his bent would actually see the person sitting before them. We are not numbers, to be caught up in judges trying to redress a balance of leniency. But that is how we're viewed. And then they go home and sleep, impervious to people who really can't work, who then become homeless. Who must rely on friends and family to eat. If you are unlucky enough to get a conservative judge, whose only focus is to comply with the push to curb what they see as runaway disability approvals, your case will fall victim to a numbers game. Judges like Paul Armstrong will likely only approve cases that are most likely terminal, or something incredibly catastrophic, like paralysis from a stroke. Otherwise, you are looking at a flat, outright denial. My disability lawyer sighed and apologized when discovering who my judge was. He tried to keep a glimmer of hope alive by telling me to keep positive, maybe I'd be part of the miniscule approval. But we both knew what the odds were. If you are unfortunate enough to recieve this judge, I'm really sorry. Your case will not be judged fairly. Period.
Don't be fooled by this judge's pleasant demeanor. He's no-nonsense, but will treat you nicely. But. This is a judge who believes that most people who are disabled are trying to game the system and just want a way to take an early retirement. If you have lived a decent, law-abiding, hard-working, middle-class life, getting disability is no fun pay day. You aren't getting to live high on the hog. It allows you to eat. That's pretty much it. If he bothered looking at the whole person, what kind of life they led, the kind of work they did, what is preventing them from doing so now, he'd see that most people aren't just burger flippers or factory workers on their feet whose vague claims of back pain seek to get them out of a hard-working, low pay existence. Many of us loved our jobs and never wanted to stop. We were paid well and led middle-class lives. We would not seek disability unless our pain and conditions made working unbearable. If you are being treated by doctors and specialists, and are on heavy pain meds; have given up your good life and existed in relative poverty, waiting to be awarded a pittance so you can now just put enough food on your table, this judge, like a certain percentage, should, take this into account, but don't. Compassion is left at the door. It should not be the overwhelming criteria that decides cases, but a modicum of human decency, when recognized, can help make a difference if he and others of his bent would actually see the person sitting before them. We are not numbers, to be caught up in judges trying to redress a balance of leniency. But that is how we're viewed. And then they go home and sleep, impervious to people who really can't work, who then become homeless. Who must rely on friends and family to eat. If you are unlucky enough to get a conservative judge, whose only focus is to comply with the push to curb what they see as runaway disability approvals, your case will fall victim to a numbers game. Judges like Paul Armstrong will likely only approve cases that are most likely terminal, or something incredibly catastrophic, like paralysis from a stroke. Otherwise, you are looking at a flat, outright denial. My disability lawyer sighed and apologized when discovering who my judge was. He tried to keep a glimmer of hope alive by telling me to keep positive, maybe I'd be part of the miniscule approval. But we both knew what the odds were. If you are unfortunate enough to recieve this judge, I'm really sorry. Your case will not be judged fairly. Period.
Don't be fooled by this judge's pleasant demeanor. He's no-nonsense, but will treat you nicely. But. This is a judge who believes that most people who are disabled are trying to game the system and just want a way to take an early retirement. If you have lived a decent, law-abiding, hard-working, middle-class life, getting disability is no fun pay day. You aren't getting to live high on the hog. It allows you to eat. That's pretty much it. If he bothered looking at the whole person, what kind of life they led, the kind of work they did, what is preventing them from doing so now, he'd see that most people aren't just burger flippers or factory workers on their feet whose vague claims of back pain seek to get them out of a hard-working, low pay existence. Many of us loved our jobs and never wanted to stop. We were paid well and led middle-class lives. We would not seek disability unless our pain and conditions made working unbearable. If you are being treated by doctors and specialists, and are on heavy pain meds; have given up your good life and existed in relative poverty, waiting to be awarded a pittance so you can now just put enough food on your table, this judge, like a certain percentage, should, take this into account, but don't. Compassion is left at the door. It should not be the overwhelming criteria that decides cases, but a modicum of human decency, when recognized, can help make a difference if he and others of his bent would actually see the person sitting before them. We are not numbers, to be caught up in judges trying to redress a balance of leniency. But that is how we're viewed. And then they go home and sleep, impervious to people who really can't work, who then become homeless. Who must rely on friends and family to eat. If you are unlucky enough to get a conservative judge, whose only focus is to comply with the push to curb what they see as runaway disability approvals, your case will fall victim to a numbers game. Judges like Paul Armstrong will likely only approve cases that are most likely terminal, or something incredibly catastrophic, like paralysis from a stroke. Otherwise, you are looking at a flat, outright denial. My disability lawyer sighed and apologized when discovering who my judge was. He tried to keep a glimmer of hope alive by telling me to keep positive, maybe I'd be part of the miniscule approval. But we both knew what the odds were. If you are unfortunate enough to recieve this judge, I'm really sorry. Your case will not be judged fairly. Period.
My son had 3 different Doctor say my son is permanently disable. He was a victim of a crime and now has severe memory issues. Even the Dept. of Rehabilitation said it was not safe for him to work. The MRI showed brain damage. He has a DVT in his leg from a genetic blood disorder. He is BiPolar, Schizoaffective with PTSD and Judge Armstrong still denied his claim. Is this man sane?????
My son had 3 different Doctor say my son is permanently disable. He was a victim of a crime and now has severe memory issues. Even the Dept. of Rehabilitation said it was not safe for him to work. The MRI showed brain damage. He has a DVT in his leg from a genetic blood disorder. He is BiPolar, Schizoaffective with PTSD and Judge Armstrong still denied his claim. Is this man sane?????
My son had 3 different Doctor say my son is permanently disable. He was a victim of a crime and now has severe memory issues. Even the Dept. of Rehabilitation said it was not safe for him to work. The MRI showed brain damage. He has a DVT in his leg from a genetic blood disorder. He is BiPolar, Schizoaffective with PTSD and Judge Armstrong still denied his claim. Is this man sane?????
Yep seeing that a person that with the same thing was 32 battling a heart disease and I'm 50 with the same issue and more ..he was approved and I was denied ....hmmmmm something is wrong with this picture
Yep seeing that a person that with the same thing was 32 battling a heart disease and I'm 50 with the same issue and more ..he was approved and I was denied ....hmmmmm something is wrong with this picture
Yep seeing that a person that with the same thing was 32 battling a heart disease and I'm 50 with the same issue and more ..he was approved and I was denied ....hmmmmm something is wrong with this picture
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
I have found through personal interaction that Judge S oandra R DiMaggio Wallis is a consummate professional who engages claimants with an object and open mindset. It is my hope that she continue to facilitate her duties with the application of knowledge and the faculty of wisdom with which she has received from our Most High God.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
Awful Person. not much other to say besides shes does not follow any laws whatsoever, not respected at all from various other judges and attorneys who see her on a regular basis. Doesn't make sense in her questioning process.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
i am just sicken to be denied again. i worked hard in my young yrs and now that im sick i have to beg to be approved what i have paid into.
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Does not follow the law. Told me in a hearing thT she agreed I coul not perform a job yet denied me in my letter? My attorney tells me she acted against the law serial times during my hearing. If you get her as your judge, go ahead withdraw your case and revile,
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis really helped my wife in receiving her fully favorable decision. She was a very understanding Judge being that my wife suffers with debilitating complex regional pain syndrome (crps) and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (cts). Thank you so very much Judge Sandra Dimaggio Wallis!!! You are the best!! May God bless you tremendously!
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
A useless ALJ. She does not follow the rules and regulations and ignores treating doctors in favor of DDS "consultants." The good thing is that her decisions are easy to appeal. Another failure on the government payroll.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Judge Sandra R. DiMaggio Wallis, we've spoken to each other in January 2018... Before I've seen you, I've waited almost 3 Years for a hearing... Please Help my Son with this Open Case situation that is going on. It's been almost 3 years & Still I'm in the midst.. waiting for an Answer. Constantly calling hoping/Praying for someone to get on their feet and actually Work on this case. I'm aware that there is a case worker a signed to my son's case but I haven't received Not a phone call a letter, nothing Nothing.... It's been many years. Yes we just had a hearing I've spoken to you, Ms. Judge Sandra R. Dimaggio, you were so kind to me and my son... It's been almost 3 months since the hearing from today... They keep saying they're waiting on papers but alllll papers and information has been faxed. They eventually say "Oh Yes we do have everything we ask for""... But then when I call again it seems to be a repeat. They say they are waiting for papers that already have been faxed by even myself. I've left voicemails back to back. Please... Please Please Judge, I ask may you look into this because Someone isn't doing much.... Please. Thank you & God bless.
Please Help Me.Please
Please Help Me.Please
Please Help Me.Please
I was treatec unfairly.
I was treatec unfairly.
I was treatec unfairly.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
viagra pill canadian pharmacy viagra viagra from india
viagra pill canadian pharmacy viagra viagra from india
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
I don't think he was fair. The witness they provided even stated I could not work with my limitations... And yet I was still denied. There doctor they sent me to put it would be very difficult for me to work.. I just dont get it .
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Judge Gaffaney presides over hearings with professionalism and intelligence. He is able to get to the heart of the claim and ask all relevant questions. Sometimes the claimants and representatives might not like this, but they have to admit that he is skilled at getting to the truth and bringing out discrepancies.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Best judge I've come across. Smart and experienced.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
Super intelligent judge. Cuts to the chase and is fair minded about disability claims.
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
This man mocked me, and taunted me, he made it clear from the outset that his mind was made up long before I had entered his hearing room. My Attorney told me upon learning he was our judge that our only hope was in an appeal. I read the above comments in disbelief, and can only conclude that they were submitted by Gaffaney himself, a 13% approval rate being one of the worst in the nation, nobody in their right mind would tender this corrupt man a compliment, or label him fair minded!
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
Frankly, the first three comments are so fantastically counter to my experience in this guy's hearing room, I have concluded that perhaps his honor posted them himself! At the time of my hearing he was turning down almost nine of every ten who came before him. I'm not talking about a tough, fair minded judge here, he was contemptuous, arrogant, condescending, and biased. I came before him with three RFC's, one from my neurologist of "five years," one from my primary internist of "ten years," and the Neurologists PA, all fully supportive of my complete disability including reams of documentation. In his decision, he accorded all of the weight to the SSA hack, who had never so much as looked upon my face, let alone examined my body! He stated that my "board certified" neurologist was only minimally credible, and that my primary was wholly not credible, a black outrage! Further, he opined in his decision that because I came from the work comp system, I was likely trying to game the system, a speculation wholly unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and so outrageous based upon the mountains of medical evidence available to him, that it bordered on the criminal!(its a federal crime to retaliate against a worker for having come through the work comp system) This man cost me years of further anguish, the loss of my last few possessions, and the return of my cancer with zero coverage resulting in the loss of my Prostate, bladder, and glands! the appeals council refused to even review his decision, mind you they refused to even "review" it, an action that took them 14 months to inform me of! But I got this evil man back, the federal district court slam dunked him, though it tacked on an additional "two years" of waiting! My attorney at the time of the hearing simply told me straight up, this man is ruthless, even though your case is a no-brainer, its highly unlikely that you will prevail in front of him, he was more then understating the issue...
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
First of all remember that the merits of your case will rule the day. I had a case history going back 11 years which made for a strong case. Although for whatever it’s worth, by the time I had my hearing on September 11, 2014, this had been my 3rd time third filing for Disability since 2008. Also a year before my hearing I was refused an On The Record Review of my case. Its known that it is tough to win with Judge Gaffaney but if your medical problems are undeniable then you stand a chance of prevailing in front of him and that’s what I did. The judges’ bases their decision on what the vocational expert says and he said there were no jobs I could do. Judge Gaffaney told me that he would expedite my decision and I received it in 6 weeks, so I don’t know how long it normally takes. I just know that I was lucky enough to get a fully favorable one.
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
Judge Gaffaney is an embarrassment to SSA. I've done hundreds of hearings and lost plenty of case, but rarely seen the misconceptions and lies like the ones from George Michael Gaffaney. His denial of my disabled claimant caused laughs in the office due to medical and legal errors (no, your honor, the RFC determination is NOT reserved to the Commissioner). I wish i could go back in front of him when this is remanded, but alas, I cannot put my client through this farce anymore. George is why client's representatives opt of video hearings. If the Commissioner wishes to have more of these, she needs to get rid of the Chicago NHC and its 20% payment rate (less than half the national average).
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I recently had a video hearing with this judge and after reading the reviews I was absolutely terrified. I was pleasantly surprised by him he wasn't rude he allowed me to speak and my attorney. He wasn't overly friendly he was just simply about getting the facts and doing his job. At this point I don't know if I have been approved or denied but I can say he heard my attorney and myself out and I do feel like he was fair in that.
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
I am from MN and Judge Gaffney was my mother's attorney. She has recently died and I desperately need to talk to him. Does anyone have a phone number or email?
Timid as I am, it burns me to lose. Even though Judge George Michael Gaffaney was the third judge to deny me, I thought I should win. I did get a full and fair hearing and I'm not going to complain untruthfully so my state Supreme Court discipline committee gets involved. I just wish I had had a stronger case or that I had been an effective advocate.
Timid as I am, it burns me to lose. Even though Judge George Michael Gaffaney was the third judge to deny me, I thought I should win. I did get a full and fair hearing and I'm not going to complain untruthfully so my state Supreme Court discipline committee gets involved. I just wish I had had a stronger case or that I had been an effective advocate.
Timid as I am, it burns me to lose. Even though Judge George Michael Gaffaney was the third judge to deny me, I thought I should win. I did get a full and fair hearing and I'm not going to complain untruthfully so my state Supreme Court discipline committee gets involved. I just wish I had had a stronger case or that I had been an effective advocate.
Good luck if you get this judge. He will deny all Mental health cases. Even if you have 12 years of documentation and are on 7 different types of meds.
Good luck if you get this judge. He will deny all Mental health cases. Even if you have 12 years of documentation and are on 7 different types of meds.
Good luck if you get this judge. He will deny all Mental health cases. Even if you have 12 years of documentation and are on 7 different types of meds.
All he cares about is keeping his denial percentage up. He does not even listen to one thing you say in your hearing. (why have one) He also made some rude comments about my weight.
All he cares about is keeping his denial percentage up. He does not even listen to one thing you say in your hearing. (why have one) He also made some rude comments about my weight.
All he cares about is keeping his denial percentage up. He does not even listen to one thing you say in your hearing. (why have one) He also made some rude comments about my weight.
Dear Judge Ollie Garmon, I have to contact you because the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. The U.S. Patent Court holds hearings on record about Salinas Acosta Weaver disability and payments filed in the Federal Court of Atlanta. The reason I am calling you is to notify the Judge Ollie Garmon that I did not receive Supplement Security Income for year 2018 - 2019 even though the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. Judge Christine Dibbles gave instructed us to write Judge Ollie Garmon at 61 Forsyth Street Suite 20T10 NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 on April 27, 2011. I could not read the first paragraph of the Judge Christine Dibbles Order of Administration Law Judgement, due to stress and worrying. Please understand, I could not read the paragraph which caused the delay.
Dear Judge Ollie Garmon, I have to contact you because the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. The U.S. Patent Court holds hearings on record about Salinas Acosta Weaver disability and payments filed in the Federal Court of Atlanta. The reason I am calling you is to notify the Judge Ollie Garmon that I did not receive Supplement Security Income for year 2018 - 2019 even though the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. Judge Christine Dibbles gave instructed us to write Judge Ollie Garmon at 61 Forsyth Street Suite 20T10 NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 on April 27, 2011. I could not read the first paragraph of the Judge Christine Dibbles Order of Administration Law Judgement, due to stress and worrying. Please understand, I could not read the paragraph which caused the delay.
Dear Judge Ollie Garmon, I have to contact you because the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. The U.S. Patent Court holds hearings on record about Salinas Acosta Weaver disability and payments filed in the Federal Court of Atlanta. The reason I am calling you is to notify the Judge Ollie Garmon that I did not receive Supplement Security Income for year 2018 - 2019 even though the type of Disability I have is a Brain Stent and Heart defibrillator ICD-9.002 implant. Judge Christine Dibbles gave instructed us to write Judge Ollie Garmon at 61 Forsyth Street Suite 20T10 NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 on April 27, 2011. I could not read the first paragraph of the Judge Christine Dibbles Order of Administration Law Judgement, due to stress and worrying. Please understand, I could not read the paragraph which caused the delay.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
It is my concern that the standards provided by Social Security to the administrators are biased towards applicants who have ready access to medical services. I'm sure this was not the intent, but it is the reality.
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
In 2013 I went in front of the judge I was fighting a paranoid schizophrenic personality disorders bipolar and just about everything else Social Security sent me to their psychiatrist she had me count backwards saying the ABC 's. That is how she determined I was not a paranoid schizophrenic while I cried the entire Hearing in front of Judge and everybody and I couldn't stop it we are fighting for our money we paid it wow in 2011 the judge used it to go to Chicago to handle three cases I believe we're paying for his plane fare for his vacation like the GSA did us
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
I have practiced SS law for several decades at all levels review . I live in Oregon but have followed my remands all over the country. Gatto came through Oregon and did some video hearings and I was appalled. My understanding is that all of his decisions were finally reversed at either AC or FDC. I was appalled at the lack of analysis given to my clients. One was in end stage organ failure related to systemic lupus and the claim was denied cause she could shop and do household chores. etc. Hopefully things have changed for him since he moved to Vegas.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
He was fair and was easy to talk to. He listened to the VE's testimony and mine. I was approved partially favorable at 6 weeks via mail. My condition is not an easy one to get approved for and was prepared to lose. I really feel that he took the time to review my records and while yes he gave me a favorable verdict, I still would give him 4 stars as he was kind and fast.
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
I just David this is Ivan Hayes Kaleb
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Ive had alj gatto for 2 separate hearings now. Denied first time because of my age, 46. Denied at 2nd hearing at age 52 with multiple disabling illnesses including 3 heart attacks, 1 which happened after gatto said i could still work, MDD,ptsd,major anxiety disorder, and back and neck disc problems with evidence from 3 separate Dr's from the v.a. Saying I was unable to work. Gatto said my Dr's weren't credible and dismissed their evidence. Also, what i said at my hearing got completely turned around making me look like lying fool. And to top it all off, hearing was mid September, didn't get denial letter until mid February. Very disappointed at the whole system.
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
Judge I would like to Thank you for the out come of my case and being so cool during my hearing. You were better to me than anyone who was involved in my case, which took seven years to be done, thanks to you. I want you to know No harm no foul-I'm referring to the mistaking health condition added to my court papers, which you corrected. Thank you again!
i dont know how my hearing will be decided, but he was very even-tempered and unimposing. i was worried, but he seems very fair.
i dont know how my hearing will be decided, but he was very even-tempered and unimposing. i was worried, but he seems very fair.
i dont know how my hearing will be decided, but he was very even-tempered and unimposing. i was worried, but he seems very fair.
Very pleasant judge. Knows when he has to do a fully developed hearing and also when he doesn't. Likes to cut to the chase on clearly solid cases.
Very pleasant judge. Knows when he has to do a fully developed hearing and also when he doesn't. Likes to cut to the chase on clearly solid cases.
Very pleasant judge. Knows when he has to do a fully developed hearing and also when he doesn't. Likes to cut to the chase on clearly solid cases.
as i said above, on 3/18 this judge seized upon my twice-weekly alcohol use, and called it "abuse". this led him to negate all my medical records, saying i could function without "alcohol abuse" (2 times weekly) if this guy wants to deny your claim to keep his NHC ratios in order, he will find a way.
as i said above, on 3/18 this judge seized upon my twice-weekly alcohol use, and called it "abuse". this led him to negate all my medical records, saying i could function without "alcohol abuse" (2 times weekly) if this guy wants to deny your claim to keep his NHC ratios in order, he will find a way.
as i said above, on 3/18 this judge seized upon my twice-weekly alcohol use, and called it "abuse". this led him to negate all my medical records, saying i could function without "alcohol abuse" (2 times weekly) if this guy wants to deny your claim to keep his NHC ratios in order, he will find a way.
as i said above, on 3/18 this judge seized upon my twice-weekly alcohol use, and called it "abuse". this led him to negate all my medical records, saying i could function without "alcohol abuse" (2 times weekly) if this guy wants to deny your claim to keep his NHC ratios in order, he will find a way.
He didn't even listen to me or the there witness the vocational expect who said with my limitations that there was no work that I could do.So here I sit trying to figure out do we live in the apt. and let the car go or let them evict us and live in the car. THANKS JUDGE
He didn't even listen to me or the there witness the vocational expect who said with my limitations that there was no work that I could do.So here I sit trying to figure out do we live in the apt. and let the car go or let them evict us and live in the car. THANKS JUDGE
He didn't even listen to me or the there witness the vocational expect who said with my limitations that there was no work that I could do.So here I sit trying to figure out do we live in the apt. and let the car go or let them evict us and live in the car. THANKS JUDGE
I live in Ohio & I had Judge Grippo for my video hearing. I was having a bad day on the day of my Hearing & therefor he ruled that my testomony was not "creditible" because it was "vague"! He also decided to ignore my Dr's report & my limitations, & instead he valued the report of the Dr that SS had sent me to! My attorney & I both agreed that some of his questions were totally out of line!!! He nit-picked my case to death, ignoring all suporting evidence & his decision of denial was extreamly prejudice!! I am very close to lossing everything including what is left of my mind!! This prejudice man has no compassion or empathy and should not be allowed to be a Judge!!!
I live in Ohio & I had Judge Grippo for my video hearing. I was having a bad day on the day of my Hearing & therefor he ruled that my testomony was not "creditible" because it was "vague"! He also decided to ignore my Dr's report & my limitations, & instead he valued the report of the Dr that SS had sent me to! My attorney & I both agreed that some of his questions were totally out of line!!! He nit-picked my case to death, ignoring all suporting evidence & his decision of denial was extreamly prejudice!! I am very close to lossing everything including what is left of my mind!! This prejudice man has no compassion or empathy and should not be allowed to be a Judge!!!
I live in Ohio & I had Judge Grippo for my video hearing. I was having a bad day on the day of my Hearing & therefor he ruled that my testomony was not "creditible" because it was "vague"! He also decided to ignore my Dr's report & my limitations, & instead he valued the report of the Dr that SS had sent me to! My attorney & I both agreed that some of his questions were totally out of line!!! He nit-picked my case to death, ignoring all suporting evidence & his decision of denial was extreamly prejudice!! I am very close to lossing everything including what is left of my mind!! This prejudice man has no compassion or empathy and should not be allowed to be a Judge!!!
What a@!!!.. Ignores treating doctors opinions and findings. Gives great wieght to CE findings & SDM findings. Chooses only portions of medical records that are not favorable to the claimant being awarded benefits. Does not consider all exertional and non-exertional limitations & what impact they have on the true RFC.
What a@!!!.. Ignores treating doctors opinions and findings. Gives great wieght to CE findings & SDM findings. Chooses only portions of medical records that are not favorable to the claimant being awarded benefits. Does not consider all exertional and non-exertional limitations & what impact they have on the true RFC.
What a@!!!.. Ignores treating doctors opinions and findings. Gives great wieght to CE findings & SDM findings. Chooses only portions of medical records that are not favorable to the claimant being awarded benefits. Does not consider all exertional and non-exertional limitations & what impact they have on the true RFC.
I had him for a video judge and i am no longer able to do prior jobs and yet he decided that i still can even though my doctors say no and cant do repetative things and that is jobs he says i can do. I am hoping the appeal works it has been long time and lot pain and stress which don't go away.
I had him for a video judge and i am no longer able to do prior jobs and yet he decided that i still can even though my doctors say no and cant do repetative things and that is jobs he says i can do. I am hoping the appeal works it has been long time and lot pain and stress which don't go away.
I had him for a video judge and i am no longer able to do prior jobs and yet he decided that i still can even though my doctors say no and cant do repetative things and that is jobs he says i can do. I am hoping the appeal works it has been long time and lot pain and stress which don't go away.
Totally worthless!!! Appealed the Video Conference hearing....that we never received notice of until June. Yet it sat in their office since March 17th. So therefore the appeal was denied. He has no compassion at all and does not listen. He even argued with his own Vocational witness that here are no jobs I am able to do, yet in his unfavorable decision states that I can do the jobs that he said I couldn't. Took almost 4 months from the date of my hearing to get a decision. He sided with me and my attorney the entire hearing and then ruled against me. This man has no compassion and even the Court Reporter basically said he was a jerk. My hearing wasn't until 10:30 but he insisted we start at 10:00 because he had a no show. My attorney wasn't finished going over everything with me, but he didn't care.He demanded we start early.
Totally worthless!!! Appealed the Video Conference hearing....that we never received notice of until June. Yet it sat in their office since March 17th. So therefore the appeal was denied. He has no compassion at all and does not listen. He even argued with his own Vocational witness that here are no jobs I am able to do, yet in his unfavorable decision states that I can do the jobs that he said I couldn't. Took almost 4 months from the date of my hearing to get a decision. He sided with me and my attorney the entire hearing and then ruled against me. This man has no compassion and even the Court Reporter basically said he was a jerk. My hearing wasn't until 10:30 but he insisted we start at 10:00 because he had a no show. My attorney wasn't finished going over everything with me, but he didn't care.He demanded we start early.
Totally worthless!!! Appealed the Video Conference hearing....that we never received notice of until June. Yet it sat in their office since March 17th. So therefore the appeal was denied. He has no compassion at all and does not listen. He even argued with his own Vocational witness that here are no jobs I am able to do, yet in his unfavorable decision states that I can do the jobs that he said I couldn't. Took almost 4 months from the date of my hearing to get a decision. He sided with me and my attorney the entire hearing and then ruled against me. This man has no compassion and even the Court Reporter basically said he was a jerk. My hearing wasn't until 10:30 but he insisted we start at 10:00 because he had a no show. My attorney wasn't finished going over everything with me, but he didn't care.He demanded we start early.
He is as bad as the others on here say, he should be fired or tried for charges. I had him for an ALJ in 2015, I'm still waiting in late 2016 for the Appeals Council to hopefully reverse this vile man's discretion. Like other people have said on here his typical mode of operation is to gave little weight to your several years doctor and all of the doc's supporting imaging and tests. Just like above, He ignored the VE saying there was no jobs I could do. He gave me an RFC of "less than light work" yet said I could do fastfood or clerking. My doc gave me an RFC of "not capable of any job" because of a laundry list of serious back problems in all 3 areas of my back, pinched nerves, DDD, broken vertebrates ect., Grippo ignored that. This vile man denies people who clearly can't work anymore, doesn't care and laughs it off. There needs to be a petition to remove this heartless thug from his job.
He is as bad as the others on here say, he should be fired or tried for charges. I had him for an ALJ in 2015, I'm still waiting in late 2016 for the Appeals Council to hopefully reverse this vile man's discretion. Like other people have said on here his typical mode of operation is to gave little weight to your several years doctor and all of the doc's supporting imaging and tests. Just like above, He ignored the VE saying there was no jobs I could do. He gave me an RFC of "less than light work" yet said I could do fastfood or clerking. My doc gave me an RFC of "not capable of any job" because of a laundry list of serious back problems in all 3 areas of my back, pinched nerves, DDD, broken vertebrates ect., Grippo ignored that. This vile man denies people who clearly can't work anymore, doesn't care and laughs it off. There needs to be a petition to remove this heartless thug from his job.
He is as bad as the others on here say, he should be fired or tried for charges. I had him for an ALJ in 2015, I'm still waiting in late 2016 for the Appeals Council to hopefully reverse this vile man's discretion. Like other people have said on here his typical mode of operation is to gave little weight to your several years doctor and all of the doc's supporting imaging and tests. Just like above, He ignored the VE saying there was no jobs I could do. He gave me an RFC of "less than light work" yet said I could do fastfood or clerking. My doc gave me an RFC of "not capable of any job" because of a laundry list of serious back problems in all 3 areas of my back, pinched nerves, DDD, broken vertebrates ect., Grippo ignored that. This vile man denies people who clearly can't work anymore, doesn't care and laughs it off. There needs to be a petition to remove this heartless thug from his job.
I was diagnosed with HSV2 about 2 years ago. At first, I was emotionally devastated. My symptoms were bad, and I just felt like I was going to die. My dentist didn't want to see me anymore when I told her that I had the virus, and my family reacted very badly. It was quite an effort, but I didn't give up. Just few months ago i found a herbal cure post in health forum, many people seem to discuss about this Action Cleanser Herbal medicine by Dr Osakar. I contacted him on osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com and he offered to cure me with his herbal medicine, i had the treatment for two weeks and everything was okay with me, I’m so much excited that i got hundred percent rid to the virus out of my life. You have the email here to contact him, osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com.
I was diagnosed with HSV2 about 2 years ago. At first, I was emotionally devastated. My symptoms were bad, and I just felt like I was going to die. My dentist didn't want to see me anymore when I told her that I had the virus, and my family reacted very badly. It was quite an effort, but I didn't give up. Just few months ago i found a herbal cure post in health forum, many people seem to discuss about this Action Cleanser Herbal medicine by Dr Osakar. I contacted him on osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com and he offered to cure me with his herbal medicine, i had the treatment for two weeks and everything was okay with me, I’m so much excited that i got hundred percent rid to the virus out of my life. You have the email here to contact him, osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com.
I was diagnosed with HSV2 about 2 years ago. At first, I was emotionally devastated. My symptoms were bad, and I just felt like I was going to die. My dentist didn't want to see me anymore when I told her that I had the virus, and my family reacted very badly. It was quite an effort, but I didn't give up. Just few months ago i found a herbal cure post in health forum, many people seem to discuss about this Action Cleanser Herbal medicine by Dr Osakar. I contacted him on osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com and he offered to cure me with his herbal medicine, i had the treatment for two weeks and everything was okay with me, I’m so much excited that i got hundred percent rid to the virus out of my life. You have the email here to contact him, osakarherbalcure@hotmail.com.
Dreadful ALJ
Dreadful ALJ
Dreadful ALJ
I was not prepared. He was straightforward and respectful. I don’t know how all you “disabled” people can talk so badly about someone you don’t know. Just because you did not get your way, so childish and shows mental illness. You should not want to be disabled. Just like you took the timeout to write a bad review. Take the time out to plan or make goals to get out your situation even with your health issues. That a lot of you make up in your head!
I was not prepared. He was straightforward and respectful. I don’t know how all you “disabled” people can talk so badly about someone you don’t know. Just because you did not get your way, so childish and shows mental illness. You should not want to be disabled. Just like you took the timeout to write a bad review. Take the time out to plan or make goals to get out your situation even with your health issues. That a lot of you make up in your head!
I was not prepared. He was straightforward and respectful. I don’t know how all you “disabled” people can talk so badly about someone you don’t know. Just because you did not get your way, so childish and shows mental illness. You should not want to be disabled. Just like you took the timeout to write a bad review. Take the time out to plan or make goals to get out your situation even with your health issues. That a lot of you make up in your head!
Is this the same Ted Grippo that has about Sacco and Vanzetti?
Is this the same Ted Grippo that has about Sacco and Vanzetti?
Is this the same Ted Grippo that has about Sacco and Vanzetti?
Re: missing word in question: Is this the same Ted Grippo that has WRITTEN...
Re: missing word in question: Is this the same Ted Grippo that has WRITTEN...
Re: missing word in question: Is this the same Ted Grippo that has WRITTEN...
canada viagra roman viagra cvs viagra
canada viagra roman viagra cvs viagra
Not good. Needs to seek other type work.
Not good. Needs to seek other type work.
Not good. Needs to seek other type work.
Super smart. Can tell she's been doing this a long time. Really knows her stuff.
Super smart. Can tell she's been doing this a long time. Really knows her stuff.
Super smart. Can tell she's been doing this a long time. Really knows her stuff.
37 year old former public defender gets appointed to the federal bench? Hardly experienced in SSA law. She's fulfilling the SSA mission to deny every possible claim. Why bother seeing your own doctor for years on end. She rejects their opinions in favor of some hack doctor who couldn't get a real job so works doing SS evals for $150.00 a pop. Just the latest in SSA's Ayn Randian-esque implementation of disability law. Such a shameful and disgraceful reflection of our era's governance. How many people with Stage III cancer, undergoing chemo for a year, are actively working full time? You are a despicable person, Jessica.
37 year old former public defender gets appointed to the federal bench? Hardly experienced in SSA law. She's fulfilling the SSA mission to deny every possible claim. Why bother seeing your own doctor for years on end. She rejects their opinions in favor of some hack doctor who couldn't get a real job so works doing SS evals for $150.00 a pop. Just the latest in SSA's Ayn Randian-esque implementation of disability law. Such a shameful and disgraceful reflection of our era's governance. How many people with Stage III cancer, undergoing chemo for a year, are actively working full time? You are a despicable person, Jessica.
37 year old former public defender gets appointed to the federal bench? Hardly experienced in SSA law. She's fulfilling the SSA mission to deny every possible claim. Why bother seeing your own doctor for years on end. She rejects their opinions in favor of some hack doctor who couldn't get a real job so works doing SS evals for $150.00 a pop. Just the latest in SSA's Ayn Randian-esque implementation of disability law. Such a shameful and disgraceful reflection of our era's governance. How many people with Stage III cancer, undergoing chemo for a year, are actively working full time? You are a despicable person, Jessica.
Judge Inouye knows the law and applies it to the facts before her. That's her job and she does it well.
Judge Inouye knows the law and applies it to the facts before her. That's her job and she does it well.
Judge Inouye knows the law and applies it to the facts before her. That's her job and she does it well.
Judge Inouye has rapidly established herself as a rising star among the federal administrative law judge corps. Her vast prior litigation experience has been a boon to her acknowledged superior ability in bringing out the truth in cases that she hears. Cases typically present inconsistencies between testimony and the medical record and other evidence. Judge Inouye is recognized as having a superb ability to resolve these inconsistencies in a manner that follows the law applicalbe to disability cases. Of course, not all claimants are happy as some are under the impression that merely applying for disability guarantees that payments will soon follow. In her difficult job, Judge Inouye's top-notch judicial temperment stands her in good stead. I see the above comments came from another stooge from SSA or perhaps the judge herself either way take it worth a grain of salt.
Judge Inouye has rapidly established herself as a rising star among the federal administrative law judge corps. Her vast prior litigation experience has been a boon to her acknowledged superior ability in bringing out the truth in cases that she hears. Cases typically present inconsistencies between testimony and the medical record and other evidence. Judge Inouye is recognized as having a superb ability to resolve these inconsistencies in a manner that follows the law applicalbe to disability cases. Of course, not all claimants are happy as some are under the impression that merely applying for disability guarantees that payments will soon follow. In her difficult job, Judge Inouye's top-notch judicial temperment stands her in good stead. I see the above comments came from another stooge from SSA or perhaps the judge herself either way take it worth a grain of salt.
Judge Inouye has rapidly established herself as a rising star among the federal administrative law judge corps. Her vast prior litigation experience has been a boon to her acknowledged superior ability in bringing out the truth in cases that she hears. Cases typically present inconsistencies between testimony and the medical record and other evidence. Judge Inouye is recognized as having a superb ability to resolve these inconsistencies in a manner that follows the law applicalbe to disability cases. Of course, not all claimants are happy as some are under the impression that merely applying for disability guarantees that payments will soon follow. In her difficult job, Judge Inouye's top-notch judicial temperment stands her in good stead. I see the above comments came from another stooge from SSA or perhaps the judge herself either way take it worth a grain of salt.
Judge inuoye decide my case right. she was fiar and look at everthng. she ok with me.
Judge inuoye decide my case right. she was fiar and look at everthng. she ok with me.
Judge inuoye decide my case right. she was fiar and look at everthng. she ok with me.
Absolutely the dumbest judge I have ever encountered
Absolutely the dumbest judge I have ever encountered
Absolutely the dumbest judge I have ever encountered
Had Ms Inouye for my case and found her to be aloof,condescending and not interested in anything that the treating Drs had to say of the person filing for SSDI. It seemed as though her decision was already made before the case was even presented based on the readings of a Doc in a box a non treating physician who reads files only. Ms Inouye is young, ambitious and has bigger ideas for herself in life then that of an ALJ and seems to have no cares whose life she has to ruin to get there. My opinion of this is based on my dealings with her and her ratio of approval and denials which turns out to be an approval rating of Approximately 18-20% NOT GOOD for anyone going in front of her.Based on the above mentioned percentages. I find Ms Inouye to be a failure as a public servant and would be perhaps better in a private setting not sitting on a federal bench collecting a public pension and pay. Ms nouye seems to have forgotten that she is A) A public servant B)SSDI a prepaid disability plan for when one becomes injured and their ability to provide for themselves becomes compromised. C)A treating Dr's testimony should always take precedence over hired paper reading non treating Dr. These are just of the few observances I encountered in my case, that I feel were wrong with her conclusion and in reading some of the above at least I am not alone. My hope in the future is to NOT encounter this woman again, may she get where ever she feels she needs to be without to much carnage in her wake.
Had Ms Inouye for my case and found her to be aloof,condescending and not interested in anything that the treating Drs had to say of the person filing for SSDI. It seemed as though her decision was already made before the case was even presented based on the readings of a Doc in a box a non treating physician who reads files only. Ms Inouye is young, ambitious and has bigger ideas for herself in life then that of an ALJ and seems to have no cares whose life she has to ruin to get there. My opinion of this is based on my dealings with her and her ratio of approval and denials which turns out to be an approval rating of Approximately 18-20% NOT GOOD for anyone going in front of her.Based on the above mentioned percentages. I find Ms Inouye to be a failure as a public servant and would be perhaps better in a private setting not sitting on a federal bench collecting a public pension and pay. Ms nouye seems to have forgotten that she is A) A public servant B)SSDI a prepaid disability plan for when one becomes injured and their ability to provide for themselves becomes compromised. C)A treating Dr's testimony should always take precedence over hired paper reading non treating Dr. These are just of the few observances I encountered in my case, that I feel were wrong with her conclusion and in reading some of the above at least I am not alone. My hope in the future is to NOT encounter this woman again, may she get where ever she feels she needs to be without to much carnage in her wake.
Had Ms Inouye for my case and found her to be aloof,condescending and not interested in anything that the treating Drs had to say of the person filing for SSDI. It seemed as though her decision was already made before the case was even presented based on the readings of a Doc in a box a non treating physician who reads files only. Ms Inouye is young, ambitious and has bigger ideas for herself in life then that of an ALJ and seems to have no cares whose life she has to ruin to get there. My opinion of this is based on my dealings with her and her ratio of approval and denials which turns out to be an approval rating of Approximately 18-20% NOT GOOD for anyone going in front of her.Based on the above mentioned percentages. I find Ms Inouye to be a failure as a public servant and would be perhaps better in a private setting not sitting on a federal bench collecting a public pension and pay. Ms nouye seems to have forgotten that she is A) A public servant B)SSDI a prepaid disability plan for when one becomes injured and their ability to provide for themselves becomes compromised. C)A treating Dr's testimony should always take precedence over hired paper reading non treating Dr. These are just of the few observances I encountered in my case, that I feel were wrong with her conclusion and in reading some of the above at least I am not alone. My hope in the future is to NOT encounter this woman again, may she get where ever she feels she needs to be without to much carnage in her wake.
Edward Earl Thomas 5th vioxx recusal chief judge edith jones 6th social security and bankruptcy and 9th bextra and celerbex adr judge fahie I want her bad check cases and constituent multi- investigation
Edward Earl Thomas 5th vioxx recusal chief judge edith jones 6th social security and bankruptcy and 9th bextra and celerbex adr judge fahie I want her bad check cases and constituent multi- investigation
Edward Earl Thomas 5th vioxx recusal chief judge edith jones 6th social security and bankruptcy and 9th bextra and celerbex adr judge fahie I want her bad check cases and constituent multi- investigation
Judge Inouye recently heard my case and while not knowing her decision yet, I felt she asked relevant and intelligent questions to ascertain my disability case. Not having an attorney represent me, I feel she will give a fair decision. That is all one can ask for.
Judge Inouye recently heard my case and while not knowing her decision yet, I felt she asked relevant and intelligent questions to ascertain my disability case. Not having an attorney represent me, I feel she will give a fair decision. That is all one can ask for.
Judge Inouye recently heard my case and while not knowing her decision yet, I felt she asked relevant and intelligent questions to ascertain my disability case. Not having an attorney represent me, I feel she will give a fair decision. That is all one can ask for.
DearJudge, I did not step out of line in my original statement to you. I only wanted you to be aware that in Binder&Binder's attempt to get more money for representing me, they failed to comply with the 15-day limit in notifying the social security office in Falls Church, Va. So they are asking you to waive our fee agreement wherein they received $6000 but also did not send a complaint to Falls Church within the required 15-day limit. V/R, Michael Bartley
DearJudge, I did not step out of line in my original statement to you. I only wanted you to be aware that in Binder&Binder's attempt to get more money for representing me, they failed to comply with the 15-day limit in notifying the social security office in Falls Church, Va. So they are asking you to waive our fee agreement wherein they received $6000 but also did not send a complaint to Falls Church within the required 15-day limit. V/R, Michael Bartley
DearJudge, I did not step out of line in my original statement to you. I only wanted you to be aware that in Binder&Binder's attempt to get more money for representing me, they failed to comply with the 15-day limit in notifying the social security office in Falls Church, Va. So they are asking you to waive our fee agreement wherein they received $6000 but also did not send a complaint to Falls Church within the required 15-day limit. V/R, Michael Bartley
I wasn't lying about my physical condition wear and tear do you know what its like to labor your bones in most of a lifetime get dirt under your nails you don't through your back out etc. you don't to get a like job at my age to yous it s just tuff luck on me huh what I don't understand is these mental so called bi polar scitsos people who don't put in to the system getting rewarded got this FBI maybe I don't understand the system and best not to ive paid my share being single ok deni my do what you please god help you
I wasn't lying about my physical condition wear and tear do you know what its like to labor your bones in most of a lifetime get dirt under your nails you don't through your back out etc. you don't to get a like job at my age to yous it s just tuff luck on me huh what I don't understand is these mental so called bi polar scitsos people who don't put in to the system getting rewarded got this FBI maybe I don't understand the system and best not to ive paid my share being single ok deni my do what you please god help you
I wasn't lying about my physical condition wear and tear do you know what its like to labor your bones in most of a lifetime get dirt under your nails you don't through your back out etc. you don't to get a like job at my age to yous it s just tuff luck on me huh what I don't understand is these mental so called bi polar scitsos people who don't put in to the system getting rewarded got this FBI maybe I don't understand the system and best not to ive paid my share being single ok deni my do what you please god help you
Ultimately, a dilemma that I'm passionate about. I have looked for data of this caliber for the previous various hours. Your internet site is greatly appreciated. kdgekdbafgde
Ultimately, a dilemma that I'm passionate about. I have looked for data of this caliber for the previous various hours. Your internet site is greatly appreciated. kdgekdbafgde
Ultimately, a dilemma that I'm passionate about. I have looked for data of this caliber for the previous various hours. Your internet site is greatly appreciated. kdgekdbafgde
Ultimately, a dilemma that I'm passionate about. I have looked for data of this caliber for the previous various hours. Your internet site is greatly appreciated. kdgekdbafgde
Judge king was well prepared; he had clearly reviewed the entire file and had read the pre-hearing brief that I wrote. He was courteous to the claimant and he was organized and thoughtful in his questioning. I have no idea how he will rule but I felt my client had a fair and comprehensive hearing.
Judge king was well prepared; he had clearly reviewed the entire file and had read the pre-hearing brief that I wrote. He was courteous to the claimant and he was organized and thoughtful in his questioning. I have no idea how he will rule but I felt my client had a fair and comprehensive hearing.
Judge king was well prepared; he had clearly reviewed the entire file and had read the pre-hearing brief that I wrote. He was courteous to the claimant and he was organized and thoughtful in his questioning. I have no idea how he will rule but I felt my client had a fair and comprehensive hearing.
I'll type another comment in hopes it will be posted. I suffer from mental illness, which has a large influence on all aspects of my life as well as neurological disorders, which both contribute to the picture. My hearing was conducted in March of this year with a unfavorable decision. Of course since I have been seeking benefits for over five years I found the decision frustrating and hurtful. I have been suffering for about twenty years as I am 28, it has been two thirds of my life. One thing I cannot understand is the disparity in statistics between the judges in Porter county. Judge Kramzyk only approves 18 percent, which is questionable only because in the context of his colleagues in Porter Co. his approval rating is clearly not pro claimant.
I'll type another comment in hopes it will be posted. I suffer from mental illness, which has a large influence on all aspects of my life as well as neurological disorders, which both contribute to the picture. My hearing was conducted in March of this year with a unfavorable decision. Of course since I have been seeking benefits for over five years I found the decision frustrating and hurtful. I have been suffering for about twenty years as I am 28, it has been two thirds of my life. One thing I cannot understand is the disparity in statistics between the judges in Porter county. Judge Kramzyk only approves 18 percent, which is questionable only because in the context of his colleagues in Porter Co. his approval rating is clearly not pro claimant.
I'll type another comment in hopes it will be posted. I suffer from mental illness, which has a large influence on all aspects of my life as well as neurological disorders, which both contribute to the picture. My hearing was conducted in March of this year with a unfavorable decision. Of course since I have been seeking benefits for over five years I found the decision frustrating and hurtful. I have been suffering for about twenty years as I am 28, it has been two thirds of my life. One thing I cannot understand is the disparity in statistics between the judges in Porter county. Judge Kramzyk only approves 18 percent, which is questionable only because in the context of his colleagues in Porter Co. his approval rating is clearly not pro claimant.
When I was at the hearing office and found out I was walking into Judge Kramzyk's room I expected the worst. I know his approval rating is very low so I have to admit I was disappointed that he is over my case. Due to his low approval rating and some of the reviews of similar judges I was honestly expecting a rude and confrontational person. Mr. Kramzyk was neither. I do not know the outcome of the hearing yet, but I wanted to say that as a Judge, he was polite and not what you might expect from a person with a 22% approval rate. For what it's worth...
When I was at the hearing office and found out I was walking into Judge Kramzyk's room I expected the worst. I know his approval rating is very low so I have to admit I was disappointed that he is over my case. Due to his low approval rating and some of the reviews of similar judges I was honestly expecting a rude and confrontational person. Mr. Kramzyk was neither. I do not know the outcome of the hearing yet, but I wanted to say that as a Judge, he was polite and not what you might expect from a person with a 22% approval rate. For what it's worth...
When I was at the hearing office and found out I was walking into Judge Kramzyk's room I expected the worst. I know his approval rating is very low so I have to admit I was disappointed that he is over my case. Due to his low approval rating and some of the reviews of similar judges I was honestly expecting a rude and confrontational person. Mr. Kramzyk was neither. I do not know the outcome of the hearing yet, but I wanted to say that as a Judge, he was polite and not what you might expect from a person with a 22% approval rate. For what it's worth...
in response to the last comment, I also find him to be nice. but, his decisions are bad news. who cares if a judge has a kind way of running a hearing. all that matters is if the alj can be fair.
in response to the last comment, I also find him to be nice. but, his decisions are bad news. who cares if a judge has a kind way of running a hearing. all that matters is if the alj can be fair.
in response to the last comment, I also find him to be nice. but, his decisions are bad news. who cares if a judge has a kind way of running a hearing. all that matters is if the alj can be fair.
I agree that most people wouldn't care how nice a judge is but I do have to wonder why the rating is so low for approvals. It could be that he doesn't allow weak cases, or bogus cases to go through. Isn't it possible that he IS fair and doesn't allow for those who really are not disabled according to SSA? Just playing devil's advocate maybe. I saw the approval rating and was expecting a denial as easily as an approval. After holding my breathe for a while I recieved a fully favorable decision. A very detailed one at that.
I agree that most people wouldn't care how nice a judge is but I do have to wonder why the rating is so low for approvals. It could be that he doesn't allow weak cases, or bogus cases to go through. Isn't it possible that he IS fair and doesn't allow for those who really are not disabled according to SSA? Just playing devil's advocate maybe. I saw the approval rating and was expecting a denial as easily as an approval. After holding my breathe for a while I recieved a fully favorable decision. A very detailed one at that.
I agree that most people wouldn't care how nice a judge is but I do have to wonder why the rating is so low for approvals. It could be that he doesn't allow weak cases, or bogus cases to go through. Isn't it possible that he IS fair and doesn't allow for those who really are not disabled according to SSA? Just playing devil's advocate maybe. I saw the approval rating and was expecting a denial as easily as an approval. After holding my breathe for a while I recieved a fully favorable decision. A very detailed one at that.
I have just learned of this site to post about the judges, and I as well had Henry Kramzyk, I just had my hearing about a month ago, and awaiting the results, and after looking at the rating for appraoval and denial I must admit I am on pins and needles, since the approval rate of this judge is the lowest approval rating compared to the other judges, and a high denial rating...as I have been waiting long enough..keeping fingers crossed
I have just learned of this site to post about the judges, and I as well had Henry Kramzyk, I just had my hearing about a month ago, and awaiting the results, and after looking at the rating for appraoval and denial I must admit I am on pins and needles, since the approval rate of this judge is the lowest approval rating compared to the other judges, and a high denial rating...as I have been waiting long enough..keeping fingers crossed
I have just learned of this site to post about the judges, and I as well had Henry Kramzyk, I just had my hearing about a month ago, and awaiting the results, and after looking at the rating for appraoval and denial I must admit I am on pins and needles, since the approval rate of this judge is the lowest approval rating compared to the other judges, and a high denial rating...as I have been waiting long enough..keeping fingers crossed
My daughter was just denied disability by Judge Kramzyk. For the last two years I have been unable to work because I have to stay home and take care of her. Her medical conditions, yes plural!, have gradually gotten worse over these last couple of years. No one will hire me when I have to leave at any moment to go get her from school or when I have to call off because her Migraine/Seizure/Vertigo (sometimes all 3) keeps her from attending. She is considered Home-bound through the state for schooling, which means she can attend as often as she can and her absences can not be held against her. I cannot afford a tutor for her and the school doesn't always have one for her. Her last "tutor" only dropped off her homework and picked up what she'd completed...no help with her work at all!She will be a senior this year. Her report card from last year shows: 1st 6 wks grading period: 2.88 GPA, this showed a steady decline through the school year to the last 6 wks grading period: .667 GPA. She took her SAT's last month and we just got them back Monday: 1160/2400. She LOVES to learn & she LOVES school! She once was an honor roll student until her medical conditions got worse. She doesn't not look disabled, but that does not mean she isn't. She was laying down in the back seat all the way to our court hearing with a major Migraine. The sun hurt her head so bad. Once we got into the building and wasn't in as much sunlight her Migraine turned into a headache, manageable. Once we walked out and she hit the bright sunlight...she was covering her eyes in the backseat and crying b/c her head hurt so bad. My baby suffers from 7...yes 7 different disabilities, she does NOT use them as excuses to get out of anything in life. She accepts them and does everything in her power live with them. She does not complain. She tells us and others, "God made me this way for a reason and I accept and trust that He is wise in His choices." She has been dealing with all of these conditions one by one as they have come up since birth. We did not ask for disability to live off of it but to use it to make her life easier to live but being able to get things for her like: a tutor so she can graduate on time, her medication that are over the counter that we cannot afford, a laptop to do some of her online school work (b/c she can't get out of bed), etc...She will probably never be able to hold down a job due to excessive absences. But SHE does not "qualify" for disability as far as this judge feels. Ask any of her doctors (yes, she has many) and they think differently. Thanks for letting my child suffer more than she has too and thanks for allowing us to continue to cry b/c we can't do anything more for her. I know and see TOO MANY people who abuse this system and get away with it and those who truly need is are left to suffer. You did not show us any ill will at the hearing and I thought we conveyed to you how much she needs this help, apparently we were wrong. I pray God helps you grow a heart of justice. May God Bless you. I know of God's blessings...He sent me His angel.
My daughter was just denied disability by Judge Kramzyk. For the last two years I have been unable to work because I have to stay home and take care of her. Her medical conditions, yes plural!, have gradually gotten worse over these last couple of years. No one will hire me when I have to leave at any moment to go get her from school or when I have to call off because her Migraine/Seizure/Vertigo (sometimes all 3) keeps her from attending. She is considered Home-bound through the state for schooling, which means she can attend as often as she can and her absences can not be held against her. I cannot afford a tutor for her and the school doesn't always have one for her. Her last "tutor" only dropped off her homework and picked up what she'd completed...no help with her work at all!She will be a senior this year. Her report card from last year shows: 1st 6 wks grading period: 2.88 GPA, this showed a steady decline through the school year to the last 6 wks grading period: .667 GPA. She took her SAT's last month and we just got them back Monday: 1160/2400. She LOVES to learn & she LOVES school! She once was an honor roll student until her medical conditions got worse. She doesn't not look disabled, but that does not mean she isn't. She was laying down in the back seat all the way to our court hearing with a major Migraine. The sun hurt her head so bad. Once we got into the building and wasn't in as much sunlight her Migraine turned into a headache, manageable. Once we walked out and she hit the bright sunlight...she was covering her eyes in the backseat and crying b/c her head hurt so bad. My baby suffers from 7...yes 7 different disabilities, she does NOT use them as excuses to get out of anything in life. She accepts them and does everything in her power live with them. She does not complain. She tells us and others, "God made me this way for a reason and I accept and trust that He is wise in His choices." She has been dealing with all of these conditions one by one as they have come up since birth. We did not ask for disability to live off of it but to use it to make her life easier to live but being able to get things for her like: a tutor so she can graduate on time, her medication that are over the counter that we cannot afford, a laptop to do some of her online school work (b/c she can't get out of bed), etc...She will probably never be able to hold down a job due to excessive absences. But SHE does not "qualify" for disability as far as this judge feels. Ask any of her doctors (yes, she has many) and they think differently. Thanks for letting my child suffer more than she has too and thanks for allowing us to continue to cry b/c we can't do anything more for her. I know and see TOO MANY people who abuse this system and get away with it and those who truly need is are left to suffer. You did not show us any ill will at the hearing and I thought we conveyed to you how much she needs this help, apparently we were wrong. I pray God helps you grow a heart of justice. May God Bless you. I know of God's blessings...He sent me His angel.
My daughter was just denied disability by Judge Kramzyk. For the last two years I have been unable to work because I have to stay home and take care of her. Her medical conditions, yes plural!, have gradually gotten worse over these last couple of years. No one will hire me when I have to leave at any moment to go get her from school or when I have to call off because her Migraine/Seizure/Vertigo (sometimes all 3) keeps her from attending. She is considered Home-bound through the state for schooling, which means she can attend as often as she can and her absences can not be held against her. I cannot afford a tutor for her and the school doesn't always have one for her. Her last "tutor" only dropped off her homework and picked up what she'd completed...no help with her work at all!She will be a senior this year. Her report card from last year shows: 1st 6 wks grading period: 2.88 GPA, this showed a steady decline through the school year to the last 6 wks grading period: .667 GPA. She took her SAT's last month and we just got them back Monday: 1160/2400. She LOVES to learn & she LOVES school! She once was an honor roll student until her medical conditions got worse. She doesn't not look disabled, but that does not mean she isn't. She was laying down in the back seat all the way to our court hearing with a major Migraine. The sun hurt her head so bad. Once we got into the building and wasn't in as much sunlight her Migraine turned into a headache, manageable. Once we walked out and she hit the bright sunlight...she was covering her eyes in the backseat and crying b/c her head hurt so bad. My baby suffers from 7...yes 7 different disabilities, she does NOT use them as excuses to get out of anything in life. She accepts them and does everything in her power live with them. She does not complain. She tells us and others, "God made me this way for a reason and I accept and trust that He is wise in His choices." She has been dealing with all of these conditions one by one as they have come up since birth. We did not ask for disability to live off of it but to use it to make her life easier to live but being able to get things for her like: a tutor so she can graduate on time, her medication that are over the counter that we cannot afford, a laptop to do some of her online school work (b/c she can't get out of bed), etc...She will probably never be able to hold down a job due to excessive absences. But SHE does not "qualify" for disability as far as this judge feels. Ask any of her doctors (yes, she has many) and they think differently. Thanks for letting my child suffer more than she has too and thanks for allowing us to continue to cry b/c we can't do anything more for her. I know and see TOO MANY people who abuse this system and get away with it and those who truly need is are left to suffer. You did not show us any ill will at the hearing and I thought we conveyed to you how much she needs this help, apparently we were wrong. I pray God helps you grow a heart of justice. May God Bless you. I know of God's blessings...He sent me His angel.
He seems nice but gives representatives no time to ask questions. If you are a lawyer, get ready for some hostile treatment. Your best bet is do a substantial file memo before hearing or have your client do an extensive affidavit or better yet, take your clients testimony before the hearing by statement under oath and file the transcript. This judge is part of the NHC , which should be called the 25% club.(percentage approved) get ready to get screwed while he stacks up the unfavorables like firewood. Avoid video...Avoid Kramzyk.
He seems nice but gives representatives no time to ask questions. If you are a lawyer, get ready for some hostile treatment. Your best bet is do a substantial file memo before hearing or have your client do an extensive affidavit or better yet, take your clients testimony before the hearing by statement under oath and file the transcript. This judge is part of the NHC , which should be called the 25% club.(percentage approved) get ready to get screwed while he stacks up the unfavorables like firewood. Avoid video...Avoid Kramzyk.
He seems nice but gives representatives no time to ask questions. If you are a lawyer, get ready for some hostile treatment. Your best bet is do a substantial file memo before hearing or have your client do an extensive affidavit or better yet, take your clients testimony before the hearing by statement under oath and file the transcript. This judge is part of the NHC , which should be called the 25% club.(percentage approved) get ready to get screwed while he stacks up the unfavorables like firewood. Avoid video...Avoid Kramzyk.
I just read a very detailed judgement of approval from Judge Kramzyk in which he questions the previous denial based purely on the medical evidence presented. I wonder if his high denial rate might have something to do with the number of people who seek disability when they are still capable of working? Perhaps he is truly fair and impartial?
I just read a very detailed judgement of approval from Judge Kramzyk in which he questions the previous denial based purely on the medical evidence presented. I wonder if his high denial rate might have something to do with the number of people who seek disability when they are still capable of working? Perhaps he is truly fair and impartial?
I just read a very detailed judgement of approval from Judge Kramzyk in which he questions the previous denial based purely on the medical evidence presented. I wonder if his high denial rate might have something to do with the number of people who seek disability when they are still capable of working? Perhaps he is truly fair and impartial?
I had a hearing before judge Henry Kramzyk 11-9-2015 I must admit he was polite although he asks a lots of questions such as do you smoke weed when the last time you smoke just be honest with him I am waiting for a ruling at this time don't be scare of this judge he's not what people say he is if you have a good case you will win such as good medical reports to support your claim.
I had a hearing before judge Henry Kramzyk 11-9-2015 I must admit he was polite although he asks a lots of questions such as do you smoke weed when the last time you smoke just be honest with him I am waiting for a ruling at this time don't be scare of this judge he's not what people say he is if you have a good case you will win such as good medical reports to support your claim.
I had a hearing before judge Henry Kramzyk 11-9-2015 I must admit he was polite although he asks a lots of questions such as do you smoke weed when the last time you smoke just be honest with him I am waiting for a ruling at this time don't be scare of this judge he's not what people say he is if you have a good case you will win such as good medical reports to support your claim.
Waited nearly 6 months after my hearing for an unfavorable decision, I feel sorry for whomever has the unfortunate luck of dealing with this ALJ. If one thing is out of line in your case, it will be scrutinized to the fullest extent! 25% club is right, odds are against you if you are seeking a positive outcome, definitely avoid if at all possible!
Waited nearly 6 months after my hearing for an unfavorable decision, I feel sorry for whomever has the unfortunate luck of dealing with this ALJ. If one thing is out of line in your case, it will be scrutinized to the fullest extent! 25% club is right, odds are against you if you are seeking a positive outcome, definitely avoid if at all possible!
Waited nearly 6 months after my hearing for an unfavorable decision, I feel sorry for whomever has the unfortunate luck of dealing with this ALJ. If one thing is out of line in your case, it will be scrutinized to the fullest extent! 25% club is right, odds are against you if you are seeking a positive outcome, definitely avoid if at all possible!
I'm just wondering what the time frame is on notification of decision? I too went before Judge Kramzyk a little over a month ago and I'm waiting for the decision. The vocational expert did say that there were no jobs available for me, but I'm still nervous. I'm sure it's normal that I am, my future is depending on his decision.
I'm just wondering what the time frame is on notification of decision? I too went before Judge Kramzyk a little over a month ago and I'm waiting for the decision. The vocational expert did say that there were no jobs available for me, but I'm still nervous. I'm sure it's normal that I am, my future is depending on his decision.
I'm just wondering what the time frame is on notification of decision? I too went before Judge Kramzyk a little over a month ago and I'm waiting for the decision. The vocational expert did say that there were no jobs available for me, but I'm still nervous. I'm sure it's normal that I am, my future is depending on his decision.
Well I wasn't ready for the news about this judge after reading about him. I have a hearing November 2 2017 with him, and just reading about him I really don't want to see him, but I guess I will go into that court room with lots of faith in my side that I will win this case. It so funny how the system gives people such a hard time . The people who needs to be questioned an drag in the ground they don't bother them. I'm going in with God on My Side an strong faith that everything will go into my favorite. I won't let the judges low rate scared me off. Until I go to the hearing I will repost an let you know how things went. Hopefully I will have good news when it's all said and done. Be back in a few weeks for the update.
Well I wasn't ready for the news about this judge after reading about him. I have a hearing November 2 2017 with him, and just reading about him I really don't want to see him, but I guess I will go into that court room with lots of faith in my side that I will win this case. It so funny how the system gives people such a hard time . The people who needs to be questioned an drag in the ground they don't bother them. I'm going in with God on My Side an strong faith that everything will go into my favorite. I won't let the judges low rate scared me off. Until I go to the hearing I will repost an let you know how things went. Hopefully I will have good news when it's all said and done. Be back in a few weeks for the update.
Well I wasn't ready for the news about this judge after reading about him. I have a hearing November 2 2017 with him, and just reading about him I really don't want to see him, but I guess I will go into that court room with lots of faith in my side that I will win this case. It so funny how the system gives people such a hard time . The people who needs to be questioned an drag in the ground they don't bother them. I'm going in with God on My Side an strong faith that everything will go into my favorite. I won't let the judges low rate scared me off. Until I go to the hearing I will repost an let you know how things went. Hopefully I will have good news when it's all said and done. Be back in a few weeks for the update.
Has anyone had any good ratings about this judge? I'm really starting to lose faith
Has anyone had any good ratings about this judge? I'm really starting to lose faith
Has anyone had any good ratings about this judge? I'm really starting to lose faith
judge was very fair.His decision was very detailed.
judge was very fair.His decision was very detailed.
judge was very fair.His decision was very detailed.
henry kramzyk is a conservative ********* who should never be allowed to judge disability cases.....he will *** ** ****!!!
henry kramzyk is a conservative ********* who should never be allowed to judge disability cases.....he will *** ** ****!!!
henry kramzyk is a conservative ********* who should never be allowed to judge disability cases.....he will *** ** ****!!!
Ive had hearing in Sept. he was very nice im just praying that i get a favorable decision!!
Ive had hearing in Sept. he was very nice im just praying that i get a favorable decision!!
Ive had hearing in Sept. he was very nice im just praying that i get a favorable decision!!
Good luck with this one
Good luck with this one
Good luck with this one
This judge has approval rating of 43% and apparently uses the same justification for all her cases. She states while the impairment is "severe" and there is objective evidence to support it, she does not agree with limitations and pain expressed. Who is she to know how much pain somoneone is in and how can she deny the medical evidence that supports the pain? Shameful..
This judge has approval rating of 43% and apparently uses the same justification for all her cases. She states while the impairment is "severe" and there is objective evidence to support it, she does not agree with limitations and pain expressed. Who is she to know how much pain somoneone is in and how can she deny the medical evidence that supports the pain? Shameful..
This judge has approval rating of 43% and apparently uses the same justification for all her cases. She states while the impairment is "severe" and there is objective evidence to support it, she does not agree with limitations and pain expressed. Who is she to know how much pain somoneone is in and how can she deny the medical evidence that supports the pain? Shameful..
This ALJ used to be in the NHC in Chicago. Her award rate has been fairly consistent. She is pleasant, sometimes ready to start hearings early. She asks for opening and then she questions claimant. A good, strong work history is always a plus. She will do bench decisions too. In my experience this ALJ is very fair. All judges have to formuate opinions on crediblity and severity of symptoms.
This ALJ used to be in the NHC in Chicago. Her award rate has been fairly consistent. She is pleasant, sometimes ready to start hearings early. She asks for opening and then she questions claimant. A good, strong work history is always a plus. She will do bench decisions too. In my experience this ALJ is very fair. All judges have to formuate opinions on crediblity and severity of symptoms.
This ALJ used to be in the NHC in Chicago. Her award rate has been fairly consistent. She is pleasant, sometimes ready to start hearings early. She asks for opening and then she questions claimant. A good, strong work history is always a plus. She will do bench decisions too. In my experience this ALJ is very fair. All judges have to formuate opinions on crediblity and severity of symptoms.
Excellent Judge. Very friendly and compassionate. Definatly happy to present in front of her. She is always fair and knowledgeable.
Excellent Judge. Very friendly and compassionate. Definatly happy to present in front of her. She is always fair and knowledgeable.
Excellent Judge. Very friendly and compassionate. Definatly happy to present in front of her. She is always fair and knowledgeable.
When the court started judge Lariccia read off to me my condition. She had not read all my medical and when told this at the hearing she still could not accessit without my lawyers help. She went into the hearing with precocieved notions and never changed them. When the vocational counselor from the state went over jobs he stated i couldnot perform light duty with my conditions I stated to the Judge. In her decision Judge Lariccia said she agrees with the doctor that I have severe pain but I can still perform a light duty job. Then she spelled out what i could perform as it relates to lifting. Noware in any reports or FCE did it say I could do that. Also she said the vocational couselor said I could perform light duty with my spoken evidence. He never said that. I faxed in a release for the hearing proceedings and never recieved them. In my opinion Judge Lariccia was not prepared for the case, and looking at her basis for decision she never read all the medical.
When the court started judge Lariccia read off to me my condition. She had not read all my medical and when told this at the hearing she still could not accessit without my lawyers help. She went into the hearing with precocieved notions and never changed them. When the vocational counselor from the state went over jobs he stated i couldnot perform light duty with my conditions I stated to the Judge. In her decision Judge Lariccia said she agrees with the doctor that I have severe pain but I can still perform a light duty job. Then she spelled out what i could perform as it relates to lifting. Noware in any reports or FCE did it say I could do that. Also she said the vocational couselor said I could perform light duty with my spoken evidence. He never said that. I faxed in a release for the hearing proceedings and never recieved them. In my opinion Judge Lariccia was not prepared for the case, and looking at her basis for decision she never read all the medical.
When the court started judge Lariccia read off to me my condition. She had not read all my medical and when told this at the hearing she still could not accessit without my lawyers help. She went into the hearing with precocieved notions and never changed them. When the vocational counselor from the state went over jobs he stated i couldnot perform light duty with my conditions I stated to the Judge. In her decision Judge Lariccia said she agrees with the doctor that I have severe pain but I can still perform a light duty job. Then she spelled out what i could perform as it relates to lifting. Noware in any reports or FCE did it say I could do that. Also she said the vocational couselor said I could perform light duty with my spoken evidence. He never said that. I faxed in a release for the hearing proceedings and never recieved them. In my opinion Judge Lariccia was not prepared for the case, and looking at her basis for decision she never read all the medical.
Very unhappy this judge mixing up all the facts in the case and also not looking into the misdiagnosis on my case file. I had severe pain in my back upper and lower and possible nerve damage, I was bed ridden for months even and currently in physical therapy. The judge had the vocational counselor come out and tell me I could do work in a factory which indeed could harm my health condition, I could not believe this when I heard it. Not only did the judge make many assumptions she thought I was just perfectly fine, she took everything out of context and reversed it backwards on me. I even sent her more evidence as to her mistakes in her judgements, she never looked at my case and dismissed everything.. my new evidence and xrays , Dr's letters etc. The fact my case was from the get go misdiagnosed and my previous condition of 15 years erased and now I am classified as having some mental condition I was appalled and disgusted with this I will surely appeal with a lawyer. No wonder she has a 43% approval rating, thanks for the facts.
Very unhappy this judge mixing up all the facts in the case and also not looking into the misdiagnosis on my case file. I had severe pain in my back upper and lower and possible nerve damage, I was bed ridden for months even and currently in physical therapy. The judge had the vocational counselor come out and tell me I could do work in a factory which indeed could harm my health condition, I could not believe this when I heard it. Not only did the judge make many assumptions she thought I was just perfectly fine, she took everything out of context and reversed it backwards on me. I even sent her more evidence as to her mistakes in her judgements, she never looked at my case and dismissed everything.. my new evidence and xrays , Dr's letters etc. The fact my case was from the get go misdiagnosed and my previous condition of 15 years erased and now I am classified as having some mental condition I was appalled and disgusted with this I will surely appeal with a lawyer. No wonder she has a 43% approval rating, thanks for the facts.
Very unhappy this judge mixing up all the facts in the case and also not looking into the misdiagnosis on my case file. I had severe pain in my back upper and lower and possible nerve damage, I was bed ridden for months even and currently in physical therapy. The judge had the vocational counselor come out and tell me I could do work in a factory which indeed could harm my health condition, I could not believe this when I heard it. Not only did the judge make many assumptions she thought I was just perfectly fine, she took everything out of context and reversed it backwards on me. I even sent her more evidence as to her mistakes in her judgements, she never looked at my case and dismissed everything.. my new evidence and xrays , Dr's letters etc. The fact my case was from the get go misdiagnosed and my previous condition of 15 years erased and now I am classified as having some mental condition I was appalled and disgusted with this I will surely appeal with a lawyer. No wonder she has a 43% approval rating, thanks for the facts.
Judge Lariccia was patient and thorough with me. My condition has caused some very real problems with memory, but she seemed understanding when I couldn't answer her questions. I went in with no expectations about the outcome, but the hearing was much easier than I thought it might be, which I attribute to being truly disabled. It also helped that my lawyer had instructed me to listen carefully to the questions and to keep my answers short and specific. The judge played an important role in keeping a scary experience feeling safe.
Judge Lariccia was patient and thorough with me. My condition has caused some very real problems with memory, but she seemed understanding when I couldn't answer her questions. I went in with no expectations about the outcome, but the hearing was much easier than I thought it might be, which I attribute to being truly disabled. It also helped that my lawyer had instructed me to listen carefully to the questions and to keep my answers short and specific. The judge played an important role in keeping a scary experience feeling safe.
Judge Lariccia was patient and thorough with me. My condition has caused some very real problems with memory, but she seemed understanding when I couldn't answer her questions. I went in with no expectations about the outcome, but the hearing was much easier than I thought it might be, which I attribute to being truly disabled. It also helped that my lawyer had instructed me to listen carefully to the questions and to keep my answers short and specific. The judge played an important role in keeping a scary experience feeling safe.
Respectful and thoughtful. Really seems to try to gain a deeper understanding through her questions as opposed to maintaining a rigid routine. Decisions are well written and rational.
Respectful and thoughtful. Really seems to try to gain a deeper understanding through her questions as opposed to maintaining a rigid routine. Decisions are well written and rational.
Respectful and thoughtful. Really seems to try to gain a deeper understanding through her questions as opposed to maintaining a rigid routine. Decisions are well written and rational.
WORKPLACE BULLY!
WORKPLACE BULLY!
WORKPLACE BULLY!
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
Nice guy, quiet, polite.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
had three very good cases heard before him on the same day. he denied them all. Because of the chance that a case might be assigned to this judge, at least while the secret judge rule was being applied, I always advised my clients against agreeing to video hearings with the Chicago NHC.
Well mannered and did not make me feel uncomfortable. Seems very neutral, calm and polite as stated above.
Well mannered and did not make me feel uncomfortable. Seems very neutral, calm and polite as stated above.
Well mannered and did not make me feel uncomfortable. Seems very neutral, calm and polite as stated above.
Nice guy, does what is necessary to get the job done. Need more judges like him!
Nice guy, does what is necessary to get the job done. Need more judges like him!
Nice guy, does what is necessary to get the job done. Need more judges like him!
This judge is tough, knowledgeable, and fair. He's now at the Chicago National Hearing Center.
This judge is tough, knowledgeable, and fair. He's now at the Chicago National Hearing Center.
This judge is tough, knowledgeable, and fair. He's now at the Chicago National Hearing Center.
Pray this is not your judge. He will not consider you disabled as long as you're still breathing. My husbands unfavorable decision is 15 pages, full of twisted comments, insinuations, insults and snide comments. Unbelievable. Tough? Yeah! Knowledgeable, obviously, Fair? No way!
Pray this is not your judge. He will not consider you disabled as long as you're still breathing. My husbands unfavorable decision is 15 pages, full of twisted comments, insinuations, insults and snide comments. Unbelievable. Tough? Yeah! Knowledgeable, obviously, Fair? No way!
Pray this is not your judge. He will not consider you disabled as long as you're still breathing. My husbands unfavorable decision is 15 pages, full of twisted comments, insinuations, insults and snide comments. Unbelievable. Tough? Yeah! Knowledgeable, obviously, Fair? No way!
I have never had a hearing with this ALJ present in the room. Always by video from Chicago. Very rude and accusatory tone with claimants. Poor judicial temperament. If I had to guess, I'd say he worked in insurance defense before he became an ALJ, and still thinks his role is the same as a PI defense attorney rather than adjudicator. I have had 4 hearings in front of this guy and only one favorable.
I have never had a hearing with this ALJ present in the room. Always by video from Chicago. Very rude and accusatory tone with claimants. Poor judicial temperament. If I had to guess, I'd say he worked in insurance defense before he became an ALJ, and still thinks his role is the same as a PI defense attorney rather than adjudicator. I have had 4 hearings in front of this guy and only one favorable.
I have never had a hearing with this ALJ present in the room. Always by video from Chicago. Very rude and accusatory tone with claimants. Poor judicial temperament. If I had to guess, I'd say he worked in insurance defense before he became an ALJ, and still thinks his role is the same as a PI defense attorney rather than adjudicator. I have had 4 hearings in front of this guy and only one favorable.
I can't believe the US Government allows Judges, like him to make accusations and judgment on individuals that are truly disabled and their medical records speak for themselfs. This Judge has put a hold on our lives and hopefully something can be done about this. We want to wish him a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, something we are not having this year!
I can't believe the US Government allows Judges, like him to make accusations and judgment on individuals that are truly disabled and their medical records speak for themselfs. This Judge has put a hold on our lives and hopefully something can be done about this. We want to wish him a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, something we are not having this year!
I can't believe the US Government allows Judges, like him to make accusations and judgment on individuals that are truly disabled and their medical records speak for themselfs. This Judge has put a hold on our lives and hopefully something can be done about this. We want to wish him a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, something we are not having this year!
Judge Marceille is professional and thorough. He gives great consideration to every claim and makes fair decisions based on the evidence he's given.
Judge Marceille is professional and thorough. He gives great consideration to every claim and makes fair decisions based on the evidence he's given.
Judge Marceille is professional and thorough. He gives great consideration to every claim and makes fair decisions based on the evidence he's given.
In reference to my post on November 20, 2012: After receiving this judge's unfavorable decision, I personally filed a new claim for disability on behalf of my husband. No attorney involved. My husband was granted disability within 4 WEEKS!!!! 4 WEEKS! Tell me he wasn't disabled when he went before Judge Marceille. (right). In the end, we won, however, due to this judge's decision, my husband was not qualified to receive the 3 years back pay that he was due. Thank you SO much Judge.
In reference to my post on November 20, 2012: After receiving this judge's unfavorable decision, I personally filed a new claim for disability on behalf of my husband. No attorney involved. My husband was granted disability within 4 WEEKS!!!! 4 WEEKS! Tell me he wasn't disabled when he went before Judge Marceille. (right). In the end, we won, however, due to this judge's decision, my husband was not qualified to receive the 3 years back pay that he was due. Thank you SO much Judge.
In reference to my post on November 20, 2012: After receiving this judge's unfavorable decision, I personally filed a new claim for disability on behalf of my husband. No attorney involved. My husband was granted disability within 4 WEEKS!!!! 4 WEEKS! Tell me he wasn't disabled when he went before Judge Marceille. (right). In the end, we won, however, due to this judge's decision, my husband was not qualified to receive the 3 years back pay that he was due. Thank you SO much Judge.
Its wrong that you denied us and sent the papers to the wrong address. I have children to feed and I see that you are not concerned about our needs. I hope you sleep good at night after an unfavorable decision with all of the medical evidence and testimonies. Thanks for nothing
Its wrong that you denied us and sent the papers to the wrong address. I have children to feed and I see that you are not concerned about our needs. I hope you sleep good at night after an unfavorable decision with all of the medical evidence and testimonies. Thanks for nothing
Its wrong that you denied us and sent the papers to the wrong address. I have children to feed and I see that you are not concerned about our needs. I hope you sleep good at night after an unfavorable decision with all of the medical evidence and testimonies. Thanks for nothing
Was a very relax fair judge.had my hearing today as her being the judge she was very kind and seem understanding God bless.
Was a very relax fair judge.had my hearing today as her being the judge she was very kind and seem understanding God bless.
Was a very relax fair judge.had my hearing today as her being the judge she was very kind and seem understanding God bless.
Just wanted to thank u for being so understanding when u made your decision on my case.im in tears of joy thank u so much Mrs.Martin
Just wanted to thank u for being so understanding when u made your decision on my case.im in tears of joy thank u so much Mrs.Martin
Just wanted to thank u for being so understanding when u made your decision on my case.im in tears of joy thank u so much Mrs.Martin
i think she is doing a great job
i think she is doing a great job
i think she is doing a great job
I pray she approves my case I'm about to be homeless and I,have a daughter. If I could work I,would its so hard.Please Judge Martin approve my case
I pray she approves my case I'm about to be homeless and I,have a daughter. If I could work I,would its so hard.Please Judge Martin approve my case
I pray she approves my case I'm about to be homeless and I,have a daughter. If I could work I,would its so hard.Please Judge Martin approve my case
Outstanding temperament and disposition as she adjudicated my case.
Outstanding temperament and disposition as she adjudicated my case.
Outstanding temperament and disposition as she adjudicated my case.
viagra cost per pill buy viagra online viagra online
viagra cost per pill buy viagra online viagra online
I wanted to send a letter of appreciation to Honorable Denise M Martin. After 2 years and 2 denials COVID-19 hit and the ability to go before an Administrative Law Judge was going to take an unknown amount of time. I was given the choice of waiting until in person reviews would start again or do a virtual review with a Judge from another state. I chose to wait as I wanted to be able to allow the Judge the opportunity to see me as a person. I was astonished when I received a letter from The Social Security Administration that my case and all medical information had been reviewed by The Honorable Denise M Martin and my case was approved. This was like a gift from God. Thank you Judge for seeing me as a person if only on paper. I cannot ever express fully my appreciation. God Bless You.
I wanted to send a letter of appreciation to Honorable Denise M Martin. After 2 years and 2 denials COVID-19 hit and the ability to go before an Administrative Law Judge was going to take an unknown amount of time. I was given the choice of waiting until in person reviews would start again or do a virtual review with a Judge from another state. I chose to wait as I wanted to be able to allow the Judge the opportunity to see me as a person. I was astonished when I received a letter from The Social Security Administration that my case and all medical information had been reviewed by The Honorable Denise M Martin and my case was approved. This was like a gift from God. Thank you Judge for seeing me as a person if only on paper. I cannot ever express fully my appreciation. God Bless You.
I do not yet know the results of my hearing but I loved judge Martin.He was fantastic, and took the edge off the hearing right from the start. Thank you
I do not yet know the results of my hearing but I loved judge Martin.He was fantastic, and took the edge off the hearing right from the start. Thank you
I do not yet know the results of my hearing but I loved judge Martin.He was fantastic, and took the edge off the hearing right from the start. Thank you
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
This is what a SSI attorney told me, that Wisconsin fired there SS judges because they were not looking at all the medical evidence per case and denying a lot of them just to save the state of Wisconsin money and so the state would get good ratings. So now there is a average of 18 month waits to get a hearing because of the state judges available and are now using Illinois judges on the closed circuit TV.
John Martin is supportive fair and applies the law
John Martin is supportive fair and applies the law
John Martin is supportive fair and applies the law
Even if not approved, judge Martin is simpathetic, makes you feel comfortable. Thank you for listening to my case.
Even if not approved, judge Martin is simpathetic, makes you feel comfortable. Thank you for listening to my case.
Even if not approved, judge Martin is simpathetic, makes you feel comfortable. Thank you for listening to my case.
Have not gotten the results of my case back yet but he is very respectful.
Have not gotten the results of my case back yet but he is very respectful.
Have not gotten the results of my case back yet but he is very respectful.
He runs the workers crazy, cancellations of the cases and schedules them over. Attorneys were jumping off of the cases, because he made them made.
He runs the workers crazy, cancellations of the cases and schedules them over. Attorneys were jumping off of the cases, because he made them made.
He runs the workers crazy, cancellations of the cases and schedules them over. Attorneys were jumping off of the cases, because he made them made.
He doesn't work and is always excusing the workers for his mistakes. He makes mistakes all the time. He can't make up his mind on what he wants. He cancels out the hearings and have them rescheduled over and over again. He can't perform the ALJ duties. He keeps the employees busy covering up his failure to perform the ALJ duties. He doesn't review the case loads timely. How did he get hired? Who hired him? How did he get the job?
He doesn't work and is always excusing the workers for his mistakes. He makes mistakes all the time. He can't make up his mind on what he wants. He cancels out the hearings and have them rescheduled over and over again. He can't perform the ALJ duties. He keeps the employees busy covering up his failure to perform the ALJ duties. He doesn't review the case loads timely. How did he get hired? Who hired him? How did he get the job?
He doesn't work and is always excusing the workers for his mistakes. He makes mistakes all the time. He can't make up his mind on what he wants. He cancels out the hearings and have them rescheduled over and over again. He can't perform the ALJ duties. He keeps the employees busy covering up his failure to perform the ALJ duties. He doesn't review the case loads timely. How did he get hired? Who hired him? How did he get the job?
He shouldn't upset the Attorneys and make them so mad. He keeps the workers busy doing the same work over and over again. He doesn't review the cases timely so that the post development can be requested. He is terrible to work with. He lays the blame on the workers when it is him not working. They was so happy at Oak Park Terrance ODAR and Downtown ODAR that he was gone. Now he is making the lives of those at the National Hearing Center miseable.
He shouldn't upset the Attorneys and make them so mad. He keeps the workers busy doing the same work over and over again. He doesn't review the cases timely so that the post development can be requested. He is terrible to work with. He lays the blame on the workers when it is him not working. They was so happy at Oak Park Terrance ODAR and Downtown ODAR that he was gone. Now he is making the lives of those at the National Hearing Center miseable.
He shouldn't upset the Attorneys and make them so mad. He keeps the workers busy doing the same work over and over again. He doesn't review the cases timely so that the post development can be requested. He is terrible to work with. He lays the blame on the workers when it is him not working. They was so happy at Oak Park Terrance ODAR and Downtown ODAR that he was gone. Now he is making the lives of those at the National Hearing Center miseable.
He is working everybody to death; keeping them busy with covering up the fact that he cannot perform and keep up with the ALJ duties.
He is working everybody to death; keeping them busy with covering up the fact that he cannot perform and keep up with the ALJ duties.
He is working everybody to death; keeping them busy with covering up the fact that he cannot perform and keep up with the ALJ duties.
Not a good Judge. Pulls fast tricks on questioning with a lot of denials and he is a racist who reminds me of a Nazi Court. He also makes up stories so you cant get SSI. The DR on the phone said that there are no jobs with my multiple health problems. So he denied me. What a bad ALJ. Get rid of him now.
Not a good Judge. Pulls fast tricks on questioning with a lot of denials and he is a racist who reminds me of a Nazi Court. He also makes up stories so you cant get SSI. The DR on the phone said that there are no jobs with my multiple health problems. So he denied me. What a bad ALJ. Get rid of him now.
Not a good Judge. Pulls fast tricks on questioning with a lot of denials and he is a racist who reminds me of a Nazi Court. He also makes up stories so you cant get SSI. The DR on the phone said that there are no jobs with my multiple health problems. So he denied me. What a bad ALJ. Get rid of him now.
Hardworking judge with a lot of experience. Always professional and polite. Great American too.
Hardworking judge with a lot of experience. Always professional and polite. Great American too.
Hardworking judge with a lot of experience. Always professional and polite. Great American too.
Best judge. So fair and interested in my claim.
Best judge. So fair and interested in my claim.
Best judge. So fair and interested in my claim.
Excellent judge. Very thoughtful and considerate in each case. He is polite and courteous with all involved.
Excellent judge. Very thoughtful and considerate in each case. He is polite and courteous with all involved.
Excellent judge. Very thoughtful and considerate in each case. He is polite and courteous with all involved.
Not a judge I was reprensented by Atty. Thomas R. Nash in 2006 when they withdraw I was going through sczophfrantic physcological, delusional disorder Addh , suffer fr om mild retardation mark some problem contrating rembering I there was a ADA disability complaint file against Alden Town Manor ,Fairmont Care Center, Pinnacle Healthcare Nursing Rehabilitation, Harmony Nusing Rehabilation ,they all took my job fom me because of my disability, race, color, education, limited or low understanding it was horrible how I took this mistreated for so long off these employer they deliberatly humilate me imtimidate me downsizing bully me I know I have a problem and my mother and sybling was also treating me like really bad and like a freak and they was ashamed of me cause I i'm somewhat slow or mentally challenge I try to be different I try to fit in I try to tell my mom she new but was ashame of me as well I went through challenges with students calling me dumb crazy please parents check onyour children because bullyiness is is serious wheather you cute , or ugly or slow some may acknowdledge some may ignor it I did but I work hard to not let people use me invade my privacy or treat me horrible which they try to treat those individual less and underminded and less smart and attractive we a human to and have human right the courts, law enforcement agents, judges, state, localgovernment agents, federal agents, I have confide in most and several it's illegal I file EEOC complaints , Human Rights Complaints, National Labor Relation Board , S.E.I.U.local Four I cry my heart is broken for many other that this has happen thats in the dark about their Heritage, County, City, ancestry and be treated like a slave instead of a human being I'm Speaking out because I want to make adifferent in someone life one day this also goes forJudge Jose Aldgada whomdid not even consider thefacts or the evidence like my medical record or physcins notes and dianose report they didn't even submit my illnessess I suffer with now i'm in pain him and my lawyer saw that I'm in pain no income live in section 8 housing going through mistretment with them and my landlord 'my local DHS office mistreating me differently then others because I reported them I appeal a ABBD medical and Cash application that was submitted12-31-13 previous Oct-17-13, 3-17-13, and complaints, appeals, greiancemost recent appeal is2-27-14 also requested my file Mr.Brundrige,Mr.Watson, Mrs.Dyer, Mr.Evans, Mrs.Crawford, Mrs.Alcarzar, and the list goes on these people shoudn,t be handling people personal information or dealing with the public that is have a very bad staff and destructive mistreament toward the public and stealing people benefits and purposely retailate againsts recepient that report there wrong doing and stand up to them it,s program fraud they know I suppose to have cash
Not a judge I was reprensented by Atty. Thomas R. Nash in 2006 when they withdraw I was going through sczophfrantic physcological, delusional disorder Addh , suffer fr om mild retardation mark some problem contrating rembering I there was a ADA disability complaint file against Alden Town Manor ,Fairmont Care Center, Pinnacle Healthcare Nursing Rehabilitation, Harmony Nusing Rehabilation ,they all took my job fom me because of my disability, race, color, education, limited or low understanding it was horrible how I took this mistreated for so long off these employer they deliberatly humilate me imtimidate me downsizing bully me I know I have a problem and my mother and sybling was also treating me like really bad and like a freak and they was ashamed of me cause I i'm somewhat slow or mentally challenge I try to be different I try to fit in I try to tell my mom she new but was ashame of me as well I went through challenges with students calling me dumb crazy please parents check onyour children because bullyiness is is serious wheather you cute , or ugly or slow some may acknowdledge some may ignor it I did but I work hard to not let people use me invade my privacy or treat me horrible which they try to treat those individual less and underminded and less smart and attractive we a human to and have human right the courts, law enforcement agents, judges, state, localgovernment agents, federal agents, I have confide in most and several it's illegal I file EEOC complaints , Human Rights Complaints, National Labor Relation Board , S.E.I.U.local Four I cry my heart is broken for many other that this has happen thats in the dark about their Heritage, County, City, ancestry and be treated like a slave instead of a human being I'm Speaking out because I want to make adifferent in someone life one day this also goes forJudge Jose Aldgada whomdid not even consider thefacts or the evidence like my medical record or physcins notes and dianose report they didn't even submit my illnessess I suffer with now i'm in pain him and my lawyer saw that I'm in pain no income live in section 8 housing going through mistretment with them and my landlord 'my local DHS office mistreating me differently then others because I reported them I appeal a ABBD medical and Cash application that was submitted12-31-13 previous Oct-17-13, 3-17-13, and complaints, appeals, greiancemost recent appeal is2-27-14 also requested my file Mr.Brundrige,Mr.Watson, Mrs.Dyer, Mr.Evans, Mrs.Crawford, Mrs.Alcarzar, and the list goes on these people shoudn,t be handling people personal information or dealing with the public that is have a very bad staff and destructive mistreament toward the public and stealing people benefits and purposely retailate againsts recepient that report there wrong doing and stand up to them it,s program fraud they know I suppose to have cash
Not a judge I was reprensented by Atty. Thomas R. Nash in 2006 when they withdraw I was going through sczophfrantic physcological, delusional disorder Addh , suffer fr om mild retardation mark some problem contrating rembering I there was a ADA disability complaint file against Alden Town Manor ,Fairmont Care Center, Pinnacle Healthcare Nursing Rehabilitation, Harmony Nusing Rehabilation ,they all took my job fom me because of my disability, race, color, education, limited or low understanding it was horrible how I took this mistreated for so long off these employer they deliberatly humilate me imtimidate me downsizing bully me I know I have a problem and my mother and sybling was also treating me like really bad and like a freak and they was ashamed of me cause I i'm somewhat slow or mentally challenge I try to be different I try to fit in I try to tell my mom she new but was ashame of me as well I went through challenges with students calling me dumb crazy please parents check onyour children because bullyiness is is serious wheather you cute , or ugly or slow some may acknowdledge some may ignor it I did but I work hard to not let people use me invade my privacy or treat me horrible which they try to treat those individual less and underminded and less smart and attractive we a human to and have human right the courts, law enforcement agents, judges, state, localgovernment agents, federal agents, I have confide in most and several it's illegal I file EEOC complaints , Human Rights Complaints, National Labor Relation Board , S.E.I.U.local Four I cry my heart is broken for many other that this has happen thats in the dark about their Heritage, County, City, ancestry and be treated like a slave instead of a human being I'm Speaking out because I want to make adifferent in someone life one day this also goes forJudge Jose Aldgada whomdid not even consider thefacts or the evidence like my medical record or physcins notes and dianose report they didn't even submit my illnessess I suffer with now i'm in pain him and my lawyer saw that I'm in pain no income live in section 8 housing going through mistretment with them and my landlord 'my local DHS office mistreating me differently then others because I reported them I appeal a ABBD medical and Cash application that was submitted12-31-13 previous Oct-17-13, 3-17-13, and complaints, appeals, greiancemost recent appeal is2-27-14 also requested my file Mr.Brundrige,Mr.Watson, Mrs.Dyer, Mr.Evans, Mrs.Crawford, Mrs.Alcarzar, and the list goes on these people shoudn,t be handling people personal information or dealing with the public that is have a very bad staff and destructive mistreament toward the public and stealing people benefits and purposely retailate againsts recepient that report there wrong doing and stand up to them it,s program fraud they know I suppose to have cash
THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME OUT , CAUSE YOU MADE ME STRONG AND WEAK AT THE SAME TIME BUT I LEARN ALOT SO THANK YOU
THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME OUT , CAUSE YOU MADE ME STRONG AND WEAK AT THE SAME TIME BUT I LEARN ALOT SO THANK YOU
THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME OUT , CAUSE YOU MADE ME STRONG AND WEAK AT THE SAME TIME BUT I LEARN ALOT SO THANK YOU
I just had my hearing in front of Judge Sylke Merchan. I do not know what will happen, but she is a great human being and an excellent judge. I wish her the best in her life.
I just had my hearing in front of Judge Sylke Merchan. I do not know what will happen, but she is a great human being and an excellent judge. I wish her the best in her life.
I just had my hearing in front of Judge Sylke Merchan. I do not know what will happen, but she is a great human being and an excellent judge. I wish her the best in her life.
Heavily biased against the mentally ill. Cherry-picks statements from doctors to support her own conclusions while completely ignoring the opinions of other treatment professionals. Focuses on minor issues such as grooming (she puts a *lot* of stock in appearance) and uses them to make completely unfounded allegations of malingering. If you haven't had the money to obtain tests or get treatment for a problem, she'll use it against you. Takes your own words out of context, twists them around, and makes it appear as if you said something you didn't. Dismisses evidence when it's inconvenient. This sorry excuse for a human being has her mind made up in advance and if it's set against you, you're screwed. I would give her no stars if possible. Thanks, Judge, for calling me a liar, relying entirely on what that fool of a doctor said, ignoring the views of the person who sees me every week (if you'd read her notes you'd know I'm really not that well-groomed), contradicting yourself, saying I refuse to take one class medication I actually take (could've just checked the list I gave you) and failing to notice that I had to tell Dr. Useless THREE TIMES that I COULDN'T take another class because the side effects are too severe. I don't have the energy to go to the appeals council. I'm done.
Heavily biased against the mentally ill. Cherry-picks statements from doctors to support her own conclusions while completely ignoring the opinions of other treatment professionals. Focuses on minor issues such as grooming (she puts a *lot* of stock in appearance) and uses them to make completely unfounded allegations of malingering. If you haven't had the money to obtain tests or get treatment for a problem, she'll use it against you. Takes your own words out of context, twists them around, and makes it appear as if you said something you didn't. Dismisses evidence when it's inconvenient. This sorry excuse for a human being has her mind made up in advance and if it's set against you, you're screwed. I would give her no stars if possible. Thanks, Judge, for calling me a liar, relying entirely on what that fool of a doctor said, ignoring the views of the person who sees me every week (if you'd read her notes you'd know I'm really not that well-groomed), contradicting yourself, saying I refuse to take one class medication I actually take (could've just checked the list I gave you) and failing to notice that I had to tell Dr. Useless THREE TIMES that I COULDN'T take another class because the side effects are too severe. I don't have the energy to go to the appeals council. I'm done.
Heavily biased against the mentally ill. Cherry-picks statements from doctors to support her own conclusions while completely ignoring the opinions of other treatment professionals. Focuses on minor issues such as grooming (she puts a *lot* of stock in appearance) and uses them to make completely unfounded allegations of malingering. If you haven't had the money to obtain tests or get treatment for a problem, she'll use it against you. Takes your own words out of context, twists them around, and makes it appear as if you said something you didn't. Dismisses evidence when it's inconvenient. This sorry excuse for a human being has her mind made up in advance and if it's set against you, you're screwed. I would give her no stars if possible. Thanks, Judge, for calling me a liar, relying entirely on what that fool of a doctor said, ignoring the views of the person who sees me every week (if you'd read her notes you'd know I'm really not that well-groomed), contradicting yourself, saying I refuse to take one class medication I actually take (could've just checked the list I gave you) and failing to notice that I had to tell Dr. Useless THREE TIMES that I COULDN'T take another class because the side effects are too severe. I don't have the energy to go to the appeals council. I'm done.
Sylke's at it again! Did she think a paranoid person wouldn't notice that she rigged the game to get my hearing back in her courtroom? I tried to end my life a month after that supremely ******** *** ******** *** published her error-plagued decision. The average wait time for a hearing before an ALJ in OKC is 10 months after ODAR confirms receipt of request. Because Sylke wanted me to appear before her smirking face again, my wait time will be 13 months. I see you, Sylke! There are 15 judges, and ODAR expects me to believe that some people just happen to get the same judge twice in a row. My case wasn't remanded. It's not as though the rest are much better; Jennie McClean is as crazy as I am and their newest hire has an approval rate in the teens. Hateful old right-wingers like Gordon, Linehan, Fulton and Shepherd (who are all regularly reversed by the federal appeals court) would make sure nobody got disability if they could. The OKC office is a nest of social Darwinists who want to wipe sick people off the face of the earth. Still, I'd like to lose to a judge who didn't decide two years ago that I'm a faker. Note: If you want to avoid Judge ********** McClean, hire Miles Mitzner. The guy fired me, called me an ******* in a letter, and I'm pretty sure he told just about every other disability attorney in the Greater OKC area to stay away from me, but he's a great lawyer who's racked up a ton of wins and he'll keep you away from Judge McNutty. You might end up with Sylke, who will decide you're malingering because she's too ****** to understand a depressed woman can have a matted mass of unwashed hair and still make it look neat by pulling it back into a bun, but better than the lady who thinks fans can keep the germs away from her.
Sylke's at it again! Did she think a paranoid person wouldn't notice that she rigged the game to get my hearing back in her courtroom? I tried to end my life a month after that supremely ******** *** ******** *** published her error-plagued decision. The average wait time for a hearing before an ALJ in OKC is 10 months after ODAR confirms receipt of request. Because Sylke wanted me to appear before her smirking face again, my wait time will be 13 months. I see you, Sylke! There are 15 judges, and ODAR expects me to believe that some people just happen to get the same judge twice in a row. My case wasn't remanded. It's not as though the rest are much better; Jennie McClean is as crazy as I am and their newest hire has an approval rate in the teens. Hateful old right-wingers like Gordon, Linehan, Fulton and Shepherd (who are all regularly reversed by the federal appeals court) would make sure nobody got disability if they could. The OKC office is a nest of social Darwinists who want to wipe sick people off the face of the earth. Still, I'd like to lose to a judge who didn't decide two years ago that I'm a faker. Note: If you want to avoid Judge ********** McClean, hire Miles Mitzner. The guy fired me, called me an ******* in a letter, and I'm pretty sure he told just about every other disability attorney in the Greater OKC area to stay away from me, but he's a great lawyer who's racked up a ton of wins and he'll keep you away from Judge McNutty. You might end up with Sylke, who will decide you're malingering because she's too ****** to understand a depressed woman can have a matted mass of unwashed hair and still make it look neat by pulling it back into a bun, but better than the lady who thinks fans can keep the germs away from her.
Sylke's at it again! Did she think a paranoid person wouldn't notice that she rigged the game to get my hearing back in her courtroom? I tried to end my life a month after that supremely ******** *** ******** *** published her error-plagued decision. The average wait time for a hearing before an ALJ in OKC is 10 months after ODAR confirms receipt of request. Because Sylke wanted me to appear before her smirking face again, my wait time will be 13 months. I see you, Sylke! There are 15 judges, and ODAR expects me to believe that some people just happen to get the same judge twice in a row. My case wasn't remanded. It's not as though the rest are much better; Jennie McClean is as crazy as I am and their newest hire has an approval rate in the teens. Hateful old right-wingers like Gordon, Linehan, Fulton and Shepherd (who are all regularly reversed by the federal appeals court) would make sure nobody got disability if they could. The OKC office is a nest of social Darwinists who want to wipe sick people off the face of the earth. Still, I'd like to lose to a judge who didn't decide two years ago that I'm a faker. Note: If you want to avoid Judge ********** McClean, hire Miles Mitzner. The guy fired me, called me an ******* in a letter, and I'm pretty sure he told just about every other disability attorney in the Greater OKC area to stay away from me, but he's a great lawyer who's racked up a ton of wins and he'll keep you away from Judge McNutty. You might end up with Sylke, who will decide you're malingering because she's too ****** to understand a depressed woman can have a matted mass of unwashed hair and still make it look neat by pulling it back into a bun, but better than the lady who thinks fans can keep the germs away from her.
While this judge did approve my SSI they requested that I have a representative payee. The reason being for this was they say that I have a daa or drug and alcohol abuse problem. I got a DUI when I was 19 and use medical marijuana to control my seizures which have caused me to be clinically dead over seven times. These two things were enough for the judge to decide that I am incapable of managing my own expenses. The term daa is outdated and the DSM defines substance use disorders as maladaptive patterns of substance use that lead to clinically significant impairment or distress. Current medical use of cannabis would not be considered maladaptive but for some reason this judge thinks so. The substance use disorder is described as when a person's use of alcohol or another substance leads to health issues or problems at work, school, or home. My neurologist is fully aware of my cannabis use and I was advised to wait on a card for medical use until after I was approved for SSI since it is only legal at a state level. This judge and their determinations are a joke and extremely biased.
While this judge did approve my SSI they requested that I have a representative payee. The reason being for this was they say that I have a daa or drug and alcohol abuse problem. I got a DUI when I was 19 and use medical marijuana to control my seizures which have caused me to be clinically dead over seven times. These two things were enough for the judge to decide that I am incapable of managing my own expenses. The term daa is outdated and the DSM defines substance use disorders as maladaptive patterns of substance use that lead to clinically significant impairment or distress. Current medical use of cannabis would not be considered maladaptive but for some reason this judge thinks so. The substance use disorder is described as when a person's use of alcohol or another substance leads to health issues or problems at work, school, or home. My neurologist is fully aware of my cannabis use and I was advised to wait on a card for medical use until after I was approved for SSI since it is only legal at a state level. This judge and their determinations are a joke and extremely biased.
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it.
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it.
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it.
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it. You are an idiot
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it. You are an idiot
I reviewed the comments about all Chicago Judges; I had a hearing before her and she seems knowledgeable and listened, she allowed the hearing to last over an hour. Other comments about the Chicago judges seem to be sour grapes by Obama supporters. They got the President and the Administration they asked for, now live with it. You are an idiot
Pretty argumentative judge she tends to give a medical opinion about the case and cites to the record incorrectly.. Listen close you will need to correct her characterization of the medical evidence. Submitted a brief in the case and she did not read it before the hearing but still asked for a theory of the case wanting the attorney to repeat everything in the brief? Huh ...she has a pretty good approval rating so I am hopeful the decision will be favorable. If you are an attorney just be on your toes about how she characterizes the medical evidence. Will quiz your client about medications even though you have submitted med list she still expects the client to have them memorized even when they are a few pages long.
Pretty argumentative judge she tends to give a medical opinion about the case and cites to the record incorrectly.. Listen close you will need to correct her characterization of the medical evidence. Submitted a brief in the case and she did not read it before the hearing but still asked for a theory of the case wanting the attorney to repeat everything in the brief? Huh ...she has a pretty good approval rating so I am hopeful the decision will be favorable. If you are an attorney just be on your toes about how she characterizes the medical evidence. Will quiz your client about medications even though you have submitted med list she still expects the client to have them memorized even when they are a few pages long.
Pretty argumentative judge she tends to give a medical opinion about the case and cites to the record incorrectly.. Listen close you will need to correct her characterization of the medical evidence. Submitted a brief in the case and she did not read it before the hearing but still asked for a theory of the case wanting the attorney to repeat everything in the brief? Huh ...she has a pretty good approval rating so I am hopeful the decision will be favorable. If you are an attorney just be on your toes about how she characterizes the medical evidence. Will quiz your client about medications even though you have submitted med list she still expects the client to have them memorized even when they are a few pages long.
Judge wants to inspect medications bring them to hearing
Judge wants to inspect medications bring them to hearing
Judge wants to inspect medications bring them to hearing
Hearings last about 2 hours
Hearings last about 2 hours
Hearings last about 2 hours
Keep in mind when I added this note she had a 45% approval rating?? Not a very nice judge. She is very argumentative with the attorney as soon as you go on the record. Hearings can last about 2 hours she requires the client to bring all medications they are on as well. She will quiz the client about ALL medications and exactly which medication they take for what impairment. In addition she will need a simple outline of each treating doctor the client is seeing and for what condition they are seeing that particular doctor for (again it just doesn't seem she reads the records or the brief before hearing)but again she will argue why a family doctor is treating for specific impairments. She is very argumentative and tends to give medical opinion about your case while citing incorrectly or mischaracetrizing the evidence. It is apparent she does NOT read briefs and for that fact she reads very little of the medical records that is how she mischaraterizes so much of the medical records. Example: in my case she argued (yep) that my client only had one back impairment when several were listed and really counselor it's all the same (when no they are not) she will argue and try to get you to stipulate to her reasoning. VE: she uses a VE but wants to skip over listing out the jobs the national numbers and the local numbers. She will again ask the attorney to stipulate that there are jobs without listing them out. No doubt her hearings are ripe for appeal but need to take very detailed notes stay on your toes and if you do go to AC with an appeal GET THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING.
Keep in mind when I added this note she had a 45% approval rating?? Not a very nice judge. She is very argumentative with the attorney as soon as you go on the record. Hearings can last about 2 hours she requires the client to bring all medications they are on as well. She will quiz the client about ALL medications and exactly which medication they take for what impairment. In addition she will need a simple outline of each treating doctor the client is seeing and for what condition they are seeing that particular doctor for (again it just doesn't seem she reads the records or the brief before hearing)but again she will argue why a family doctor is treating for specific impairments. She is very argumentative and tends to give medical opinion about your case while citing incorrectly or mischaracetrizing the evidence. It is apparent she does NOT read briefs and for that fact she reads very little of the medical records that is how she mischaraterizes so much of the medical records. Example: in my case she argued (yep) that my client only had one back impairment when several were listed and really counselor it's all the same (when no they are not) she will argue and try to get you to stipulate to her reasoning. VE: she uses a VE but wants to skip over listing out the jobs the national numbers and the local numbers. She will again ask the attorney to stipulate that there are jobs without listing them out. No doubt her hearings are ripe for appeal but need to take very detailed notes stay on your toes and if you do go to AC with an appeal GET THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING.
Keep in mind when I added this note she had a 45% approval rating?? Not a very nice judge. She is very argumentative with the attorney as soon as you go on the record. Hearings can last about 2 hours she requires the client to bring all medications they are on as well. She will quiz the client about ALL medications and exactly which medication they take for what impairment. In addition she will need a simple outline of each treating doctor the client is seeing and for what condition they are seeing that particular doctor for (again it just doesn't seem she reads the records or the brief before hearing)but again she will argue why a family doctor is treating for specific impairments. She is very argumentative and tends to give medical opinion about your case while citing incorrectly or mischaracetrizing the evidence. It is apparent she does NOT read briefs and for that fact she reads very little of the medical records that is how she mischaraterizes so much of the medical records. Example: in my case she argued (yep) that my client only had one back impairment when several were listed and really counselor it's all the same (when no they are not) she will argue and try to get you to stipulate to her reasoning. VE: she uses a VE but wants to skip over listing out the jobs the national numbers and the local numbers. She will again ask the attorney to stipulate that there are jobs without listing them out. No doubt her hearings are ripe for appeal but need to take very detailed notes stay on your toes and if you do go to AC with an appeal GET THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING.
That 3/8/13 comment and a couple others badly mischaracterize Judge Michaelson. I've had enough hearings with her to know that she knows the law, has read your brief, and has a refreshingly practical manner in which she conducts the hearing. And she does talk to the claimant in a way they can understand. Just putting in my 2 cents.
That 3/8/13 comment and a couple others badly mischaracterize Judge Michaelson. I've had enough hearings with her to know that she knows the law, has read your brief, and has a refreshingly practical manner in which she conducts the hearing. And she does talk to the claimant in a way they can understand. Just putting in my 2 cents.
That 3/8/13 comment and a couple others badly mischaracterize Judge Michaelson. I've had enough hearings with her to know that she knows the law, has read your brief, and has a refreshingly practical manner in which she conducts the hearing. And she does talk to the claimant in a way they can understand. Just putting in my 2 cents.
I had a hearing in front of this judge, very nice judge. She listened to my testimony and appears to be very knowledgeable of the case. Besides she took the time to offer suggestions to better improved my health. Very good judge. Keep up a good work!
I had a hearing in front of this judge, very nice judge. She listened to my testimony and appears to be very knowledgeable of the case. Besides she took the time to offer suggestions to better improved my health. Very good judge. Keep up a good work!
I had a hearing in front of this judge, very nice judge. She listened to my testimony and appears to be very knowledgeable of the case. Besides she took the time to offer suggestions to better improved my health. Very good judge. Keep up a good work!
Very fair judge. She is smart and knowledgeable about Social Security law.
Very fair judge. She is smart and knowledgeable about Social Security law.
Very fair judge. She is smart and knowledgeable about Social Security law.
Judge Nagle really seems to understand the disability process. I have appeared before dozens of ALJs in disability cases in Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia and I rank her among the top three. I look forward to having cases with her in the future.
Judge Nagle really seems to understand the disability process. I have appeared before dozens of ALJs in disability cases in Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia and I rank her among the top three. I look forward to having cases with her in the future.
Judge Nagle really seems to understand the disability process. I have appeared before dozens of ALJs in disability cases in Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia and I rank her among the top three. I look forward to having cases with her in the future.
Reversed and remanded again! A judge cannot lie and claim evidence does not exist when it clearly does.
Reversed and remanded again! A judge cannot lie and claim evidence does not exist when it clearly does.
Reversed and remanded again! A judge cannot lie and claim evidence does not exist when it clearly does.
Extremely fair judge with a pleasant demeanor. She gets right to the point and does not waste time with unnecessary questions. She is very respectful of the Claimant and can be interactive with counsel. She handles most of the questioning and the hearings last 30-45 minutes.
Extremely fair judge with a pleasant demeanor. She gets right to the point and does not waste time with unnecessary questions. She is very respectful of the Claimant and can be interactive with counsel. She handles most of the questioning and the hearings last 30-45 minutes.
Extremely fair judge with a pleasant demeanor. She gets right to the point and does not waste time with unnecessary questions. She is very respectful of the Claimant and can be interactive with counsel. She handles most of the questioning and the hearings last 30-45 minutes.
Even though there labor person said I could not hold a job she denied me anyway gonna lose everything I have very devastating she seemed very nice but that is as far as it goes don't know what to do now
Even though there labor person said I could not hold a job she denied me anyway gonna lose everything I have very devastating she seemed very nice but that is as far as it goes don't know what to do now
Even though there labor person said I could not hold a job she denied me anyway gonna lose everything I have very devastating she seemed very nice but that is as far as it goes don't know what to do now
He's never at work, schedule hearings nor hold hearings. Where is he at all this time. Where do they get all of these judges that never wants to work.
He's never at work, schedule hearings nor hold hearings. Where is he at all this time. Where do they get all of these judges that never wants to work.
He's never at work, schedule hearings nor hold hearings. Where is he at all this time. Where do they get all of these judges that never wants to work.
He's never at work, nor holds hearings. Where is he at all the time.
He's never at work, nor holds hearings. Where is he at all the time.
He's never at work, nor holds hearings. Where is he at all the time.
Why are you not at work. What kind of Guy are you. You don't hold hearings. I quess you don't want to work too. You just get a free government paycheck. Wow! the government must have a lot of money to just give away.
Why are you not at work. What kind of Guy are you. You don't hold hearings. I quess you don't want to work too. You just get a free government paycheck. Wow! the government must have a lot of money to just give away.
Why are you not at work. What kind of Guy are you. You don't hold hearings. I quess you don't want to work too. You just get a free government paycheck. Wow! the government must have a lot of money to just give away.
She is incapable of performing her ALJ duties. She keeps the whole office busy covering up the fact that she don't have the mental capacity to do anything right.
She is incapable of performing her ALJ duties. She keeps the whole office busy covering up the fact that she don't have the mental capacity to do anything right.
She is incapable of performing her ALJ duties. She keeps the whole office busy covering up the fact that she don't have the mental capacity to do anything right.
You know that you are not working; you are just pretending in order to get that big government paycheck/handout.
You know that you are not working; you are just pretending in order to get that big government paycheck/handout.
You know that you are not working; you are just pretending in order to get that big government paycheck/handout.
fair, knowledgeable, excellent judge
fair, knowledgeable, excellent judge
fair, knowledgeable, excellent judge
She can't make up her mind on what she wants to do with the cases. She is always cancelling out the cases to please herself and she is self-serving. She can't do that big ALJ job. She works the employees too hard in order to make herself look good. She hollers at them and excuses them of her mistakes.
She can't make up her mind on what she wants to do with the cases. She is always cancelling out the cases to please herself and she is self-serving. She can't do that big ALJ job. She works the employees too hard in order to make herself look good. She hollers at them and excuses them of her mistakes.
She can't make up her mind on what she wants to do with the cases. She is always cancelling out the cases to please herself and she is self-serving. She can't do that big ALJ job. She works the employees too hard in order to make herself look good. She hollers at them and excuses them of her mistakes.
Have had 2 hearings with this judge. She had VE and ME at both hearings. Asks rep for theory of the case. She does general questioning of claimant and lets rep follow up. She did not seem that familiar with the file. If claimant has no insurance or money and has not gotten necessary medical treatment, ALJ will grill claimant on whether she attempted to get help from friends/family or tried to work out a payment plan. I'm not aware of any docs or hospitals that will accept a payment plan for spinal fusion surgery where the patient is disabled and has no income. She then lectured claimant on how this wasn't an alternate health care program, even after we provided documentation that her health insurer denied this well accepted procedure as "experimental". She did seem indecisive and wavering back and forth throughout the hearing. I had to draw her attention to key points in the evidence. She did not indicate her ruling at the hearing.
Have had 2 hearings with this judge. She had VE and ME at both hearings. Asks rep for theory of the case. She does general questioning of claimant and lets rep follow up. She did not seem that familiar with the file. If claimant has no insurance or money and has not gotten necessary medical treatment, ALJ will grill claimant on whether she attempted to get help from friends/family or tried to work out a payment plan. I'm not aware of any docs or hospitals that will accept a payment plan for spinal fusion surgery where the patient is disabled and has no income. She then lectured claimant on how this wasn't an alternate health care program, even after we provided documentation that her health insurer denied this well accepted procedure as "experimental". She did seem indecisive and wavering back and forth throughout the hearing. I had to draw her attention to key points in the evidence. She did not indicate her ruling at the hearing.
Have had 2 hearings with this judge. She had VE and ME at both hearings. Asks rep for theory of the case. She does general questioning of claimant and lets rep follow up. She did not seem that familiar with the file. If claimant has no insurance or money and has not gotten necessary medical treatment, ALJ will grill claimant on whether she attempted to get help from friends/family or tried to work out a payment plan. I'm not aware of any docs or hospitals that will accept a payment plan for spinal fusion surgery where the patient is disabled and has no income. She then lectured claimant on how this wasn't an alternate health care program, even after we provided documentation that her health insurer denied this well accepted procedure as "experimental". She did seem indecisive and wavering back and forth throughout the hearing. I had to draw her attention to key points in the evidence. She did not indicate her ruling at the hearing.
Judge Parkhurst is unorganized and arguementative. She argues just to argue. She is disrespectful to all parties involved in the hearing.
Judge Parkhurst is unorganized and arguementative. She argues just to argue. She is disrespectful to all parties involved in the hearing.
Judge Parkhurst is unorganized and arguementative. She argues just to argue. She is disrespectful to all parties involved in the hearing.
She yelled at the court clerk, the expert witnesses and talked down to everyone involved in the hearing. It was a very disturbing and unorganized experience.
She yelled at the court clerk, the expert witnesses and talked down to everyone involved in the hearing. It was a very disturbing and unorganized experience.
She yelled at the court clerk, the expert witnesses and talked down to everyone involved in the hearing. It was a very disturbing and unorganized experience.
Our client had a hearing before Judge Parkhurst at 11am...the hearing did not take place until after 2pm. There was not explanation as for the wait. The Judge was extremely rude, mean, and grumpy to Attorney and our client. It is very sad that these Judges are allow to behave and start a hearing whenever, however they want. There needs to be some sort of check and balance. PLEASE BEWARE - if you ever have to deal with this Judge. Very sad an individual does not have a fair chance to a hearing proceeding. - 7 stars on rating for this Judge
Our client had a hearing before Judge Parkhurst at 11am...the hearing did not take place until after 2pm. There was not explanation as for the wait. The Judge was extremely rude, mean, and grumpy to Attorney and our client. It is very sad that these Judges are allow to behave and start a hearing whenever, however they want. There needs to be some sort of check and balance. PLEASE BEWARE - if you ever have to deal with this Judge. Very sad an individual does not have a fair chance to a hearing proceeding. - 7 stars on rating for this Judge
Our client had a hearing before Judge Parkhurst at 11am...the hearing did not take place until after 2pm. There was not explanation as for the wait. The Judge was extremely rude, mean, and grumpy to Attorney and our client. It is very sad that these Judges are allow to behave and start a hearing whenever, however they want. There needs to be some sort of check and balance. PLEASE BEWARE - if you ever have to deal with this Judge. Very sad an individual does not have a fair chance to a hearing proceeding. - 7 stars on rating for this Judge
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to both Counsel and client. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late and then it took nearly two hours. One hour had passed before she even asked the claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain and clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out the claimant in open court and question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and even questioned his motive for filing for disability. My client was angry and distraught, and the ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line with other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review the evidence, listen to the client's testimony, act cordially and professionally, appear empathetic and when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to Counsel & claimant. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late & then it took two hours. One hour passed before she even asked claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain & clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out claimant in open court & question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and questioned his motive for filing disability. My client was angry/distraught. The ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line w/other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review evidence, listen to client's testimony, act cordially & professionally, appear empathetic & when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to Counsel & claimant. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late & then it took two hours. One hour passed before she even asked claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain & clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out claimant in open court & question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and questioned his motive for filing disability. My client was angry/distraught. The ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line w/other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review evidence, listen to client's testimony, act cordially & professionally, appear empathetic & when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension.
In all my years as an attorney working in this field, I have never met a more rude, unempathetic, unprofessional, impatient, condescending, arrogant judge...to Counsel & claimant. There is no room for an ALJ like her in this area of law. First, the hearing started late & then it took two hours. One hour passed before she even asked claimant a relevant question. Claimant was sitting there squirming in pain & clearly frustrated. I understand some cases are weaker than others, but it is NOT her place to call out claimant in open court & question their subjective pain, based on her assessment of the evidence, and refuse to give them a break when asked for because she thinks they shouldn't be in that much pain. She did everything but call my client a malingerer and questioned his motive for filing disability. My client was angry/distraught. The ALJ was rude to Counsel as well, which is in line w/other opinions of this person. An ALJ can disagree with the level of severity of a condition, and may not think a person is disabled, but that is what the written decision is for. An ALJ's job during the hearing is to review evidence, listen to client's testimony, act cordially & professionally, appear empathetic & when all is evaluated, render a proper decision. The ALJ hiring process is extremely rigorous and lengthy. How this person managed to be hired as a judge in this area of law where we deal with a sensitive population is beyond comprehension.
This woman is one of the rudest, most judgmental, condescending, down right nasty and cruel women I have ever met in my entire life. The things she brought up in my hearing to question me about had very little to do with my disability and ability to work. I felt like I was on trial for something criminal. She even asked about my mothers personal medical treatments. What would make a judge ask personal questions about someone who isn't present or even involved in my claim? Aren't there hipa laws to protect people against those sorts of things??? She talked to every single person involved in my hearing, including the two other professionals there to help with the decision of my claim, like we were beneath her. To me, this woman thought so highly of herself that she had the right to say whatever, whenever she wanted to, whether it had to do with the case or not, and that she was so high and mighty that there was nothing anyone could do about it. She is a disgrace not only to the judicial system but to humanity as well. Not a sympathetic, understanding, relatable bone in her body.
This woman is one of the rudest, most judgmental, condescending, down right nasty and cruel women I have ever met in my entire life. The things she brought up in my hearing to question me about had very little to do with my disability and ability to work. I felt like I was on trial for something criminal. She even asked about my mothers personal medical treatments. What would make a judge ask personal questions about someone who isn't present or even involved in my claim? Aren't there hipa laws to protect people against those sorts of things??? She talked to every single person involved in my hearing, including the two other professionals there to help with the decision of my claim, like we were beneath her. To me, this woman thought so highly of herself that she had the right to say whatever, whenever she wanted to, whether it had to do with the case or not, and that she was so high and mighty that there was nothing anyone could do about it. She is a disgrace not only to the judicial system but to humanity as well. Not a sympathetic, understanding, relatable bone in her body.
This woman is one of the rudest, most judgmental, condescending, down right nasty and cruel women I have ever met in my entire life. The things she brought up in my hearing to question me about had very little to do with my disability and ability to work. I felt like I was on trial for something criminal. She even asked about my mothers personal medical treatments. What would make a judge ask personal questions about someone who isn't present or even involved in my claim? Aren't there hipa laws to protect people against those sorts of things??? She talked to every single person involved in my hearing, including the two other professionals there to help with the decision of my claim, like we were beneath her. To me, this woman thought so highly of herself that she had the right to say whatever, whenever she wanted to, whether it had to do with the case or not, and that she was so high and mighty that there was nothing anyone could do about it. She is a disgrace not only to the judicial system but to humanity as well. Not a sympathetic, understanding, relatable bone in her body.
I thought she was extremely nice to me and respectful! I’m extremely shocked because she was understanding and not rude at all. Honestly I might have gotten lucky according to the remarks about her? I don’t have my decision yet and I won’t know for awhile. Regardless even if she rules against me I figure it’s God will for me to get on my feet and get a job. My heart is in the right place, and I thought she went above and beyond to judge me fairly. She asked tons of questions and allowed me to answer slowly. When I was confused she told me to take a deep breath and not to be overwhelmed. I loved her!
I thought she was extremely nice to me and respectful! I’m extremely shocked because she was understanding and not rude at all. Honestly I might have gotten lucky according to the remarks about her? I don’t have my decision yet and I won’t know for awhile. Regardless even if she rules against me I figure it’s God will for me to get on my feet and get a job. My heart is in the right place, and I thought she went above and beyond to judge me fairly. She asked tons of questions and allowed me to answer slowly. When I was confused she told me to take a deep breath and not to be overwhelmed. I loved her!
I thought she was extremely nice to me and respectful! I’m extremely shocked because she was understanding and not rude at all. Honestly I might have gotten lucky according to the remarks about her? I don’t have my decision yet and I won’t know for awhile. Regardless even if she rules against me I figure it’s God will for me to get on my feet and get a job. My heart is in the right place, and I thought she went above and beyond to judge me fairly. She asked tons of questions and allowed me to answer slowly. When I was confused she told me to take a deep breath and not to be overwhelmed. I loved her!
One cannot but wonder why Judge Pope's Approved claims are so far out of line with the other judges in his State, in the Nation, and even in his own office. Very interesting...I can certainly draw my own inference.
One cannot but wonder why Judge Pope's Approved claims are so far out of line with the other judges in his State, in the Nation, and even in his own office. Very interesting...I can certainly draw my own inference.
One cannot but wonder why Judge Pope's Approved claims are so far out of line with the other judges in his State, in the Nation, and even in his own office. Very interesting...I can certainly draw my own inference.
This man filed a lawsuit because he didn't get a job as Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Judge, so he sued won then lost,even with his extra points for serving in the military he couldn't keep this job. He could not get a job as an FCC judge, so he sued and lost. Social Security ALJ is the only job he could get. He is disgruntled and takes it out on applicants. He refused to consider witness testimony from the Vocation Rehab Counselor, and threw out the Social Security doctor's exam report. I was told by the ODAR in Fort Wayne he had been fired. The Chicago office denies he ever worked there.
This man filed a lawsuit because he didn't get a job as Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Judge, so he sued won then lost,even with his extra points for serving in the military he couldn't keep this job. He could not get a job as an FCC judge, so he sued and lost. Social Security ALJ is the only job he could get. He is disgruntled and takes it out on applicants. He refused to consider witness testimony from the Vocation Rehab Counselor, and threw out the Social Security doctor's exam report. I was told by the ODAR in Fort Wayne he had been fired. The Chicago office denies he ever worked there.
This man filed a lawsuit because he didn't get a job as Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Judge, so he sued won then lost,even with his extra points for serving in the military he couldn't keep this job. He could not get a job as an FCC judge, so he sued and lost. Social Security ALJ is the only job he could get. He is disgruntled and takes it out on applicants. He refused to consider witness testimony from the Vocation Rehab Counselor, and threw out the Social Security doctor's exam report. I was told by the ODAR in Fort Wayne he had been fired. The Chicago office denies he ever worked there.
The prior comment is ridiculous and untrue. The comments about Judge Pope's hisotry is blatantly false, so take the rest with a wheelbarrow of salt.
The prior comment is ridiculous and untrue. The comments about Judge Pope's hisotry is blatantly false, so take the rest with a wheelbarrow of salt.
The prior comment is ridiculous and untrue. The comments about Judge Pope's hisotry is blatantly false, so take the rest with a wheelbarrow of salt.
Highly limited in his ability to properly adjudicate claims. Argumentative, jumps to conclusions and is ill prepared.
Highly limited in his ability to properly adjudicate claims. Argumentative, jumps to conclusions and is ill prepared.
Highly limited in his ability to properly adjudicate claims. Argumentative, jumps to conclusions and is ill prepared.
This judge cut my wife off twice during the hearing and sometimes wouldn't let her finish.He looked bored most of the time during the hearing.He also implied that she lied during the hearing.
This judge cut my wife off twice during the hearing and sometimes wouldn't let her finish.He looked bored most of the time during the hearing.He also implied that she lied during the hearing.
This judge cut my wife off twice during the hearing and sometimes wouldn't let her finish.He looked bored most of the time during the hearing.He also implied that she lied during the hearing.
Smart judge, excellent demeanor, looks intimidating but always considers each case fairly based on the evidence. Can't ask for more.
Smart judge, excellent demeanor, looks intimidating but always considers each case fairly based on the evidence. Can't ask for more.
Smart judge, excellent demeanor, looks intimidating but always considers each case fairly based on the evidence. Can't ask for more.
This Judge misstated facts on his decision for social security. Case pending. This Judge has a 63% percent denial rate. Enough said.
This Judge misstated facts on his decision for social security. Case pending. This Judge has a 63% percent denial rate. Enough said.
This Judge misstated facts on his decision for social security. Case pending. This Judge has a 63% percent denial rate. Enough said.
This Judge misstated facts on his decision for social security. Case pending. This Judge has a 63% percent denial rate. Enough said.
Judge's poor decision and what appears to be misstated facts may cost a person their life due to lack of medical care. His denial rate is ridiculous or there are a lot of fraudulent cases. 75 percent denial in 2013. Why is this person on the bench.
Judge's poor decision and what appears to be misstated facts may cost a person their life due to lack of medical care. His denial rate is ridiculous or there are a lot of fraudulent cases. 75 percent denial in 2013. Why is this person on the bench.
Judge's poor decision and what appears to be misstated facts may cost a person their life due to lack of medical care. His denial rate is ridiculous or there are a lot of fraudulent cases. 75 percent denial in 2013. Why is this person on the bench.
Judge's poor decision and what appears to be misstated facts may cost a person their life due to lack of medical care. His denial rate is ridiculous or there are a lot of fraudulent cases. 75 percent denial in 2013. Why is this person on the bench.
I don't think he understands medical conditions, To be that kind of judge when peoples health is a stake not only look at both sides but look up the conditions and have a better understanding of the health issues. The ssi doctors are paid to say yes they can still work. A Judge that is in this position should not take sides but know the health issue and make a fair choice.
I don't think he understands medical conditions, To be that kind of judge when peoples health is a stake not only look at both sides but look up the conditions and have a better understanding of the health issues. The ssi doctors are paid to say yes they can still work. A Judge that is in this position should not take sides but know the health issue and make a fair choice.
I don't think he understands medical conditions, To be that kind of judge when peoples health is a stake not only look at both sides but look up the conditions and have a better understanding of the health issues. The ssi doctors are paid to say yes they can still work. A Judge that is in this position should not take sides but know the health issue and make a fair choice.
canada viagra buying viagra online order viagra online
canada viagra buying viagra online order viagra online
She is much more prone to deny in spite of good medical evidence. She makes a habit of dismissing treating source opinions even when they match the evidence as a whole.
She is much more prone to deny in spite of good medical evidence. She makes a habit of dismissing treating source opinions even when they match the evidence as a whole.
She is much more prone to deny in spite of good medical evidence. She makes a habit of dismissing treating source opinions even when they match the evidence as a whole.
The ALJ is not competent!!! She ignores evidence, blows off treating source opinions, uses poor judgement and is prone to be long winded. She needs to be removed.
The ALJ is not competent!!! She ignores evidence, blows off treating source opinions, uses poor judgement and is prone to be long winded. She needs to be removed.
The ALJ is not competent!!! She ignores evidence, blows off treating source opinions, uses poor judgement and is prone to be long winded. She needs to be removed.
Has no heart. Is not sympathetic with respect to terminal cases.
Has no heart. Is not sympathetic with respect to terminal cases.
Has no heart. Is not sympathetic with respect to terminal cases.
Judge Poulose is one smart judge with a lot of Social Security experience. She really knows the law and weighs the evidence fairly. Not every doctor is believable and she is able to explain why. She is very skilled at getting to the heart of the issues.
Judge Poulose is one smart judge with a lot of Social Security experience. She really knows the law and weighs the evidence fairly. Not every doctor is believable and she is able to explain why. She is very skilled at getting to the heart of the issues.
Judge Poulose is one smart judge with a lot of Social Security experience. She really knows the law and weighs the evidence fairly. Not every doctor is believable and she is able to explain why. She is very skilled at getting to the heart of the issues.
She is terrible, god awful judge. Its nice that SSA employees defend the indefensible.
She is terrible, god awful judge. Its nice that SSA employees defend the indefensible.
She is terrible, god awful judge. Its nice that SSA employees defend the indefensible.
Polouse doesnt know a hole from a apple extremly incompitant as a judge or human bieng and should step down from the podeum she sits on for she unfit to judge others the worst jugde would nt trust her with a tooth pick
Polouse doesnt know a hole from a apple extremly incompitant as a judge or human bieng and should step down from the podeum she sits on for she unfit to judge others the worst jugde would nt trust her with a tooth pick
Polouse doesnt know a hole from a apple extremly incompitant as a judge or human bieng and should step down from the podeum she sits on for she unfit to judge others the worst jugde would nt trust her with a tooth pick
took the time to explain the law to me so I understood it. explained that if I did not have medical records before my insurance date ended I was not going to get disability. she spent time to help me figure out where I went to the doctor and then said she would try to get those records. don't think i'll get disabilty based on what she said, but at least she cares enough to try.
took the time to explain the law to me so I understood it. explained that if I did not have medical records before my insurance date ended I was not going to get disability. she spent time to help me figure out where I went to the doctor and then said she would try to get those records. don't think i'll get disabilty based on what she said, but at least she cares enough to try.
took the time to explain the law to me so I understood it. explained that if I did not have medical records before my insurance date ended I was not going to get disability. she spent time to help me figure out where I went to the doctor and then said she would try to get those records. don't think i'll get disabilty based on what she said, but at least she cares enough to try.
She does not like to listen if you are sick. She only respects the social security administration, she is the worse judge. Very strong. She thinks that the people lie and invent what the disability people is suffering
She does not like to listen if you are sick. She only respects the social security administration, she is the worse judge. Very strong. She thinks that the people lie and invent what the disability people is suffering
She does not like to listen if you are sick. She only respects the social security administration, she is the worse judge. Very strong. She thinks that the people lie and invent what the disability people is suffering
I am suffering of whole pain in my body, I am suffering emotional stress . Why ? Because the wrong decisions of her. You have a TERMINAL case she will denied your petition.
I am suffering of whole pain in my body, I am suffering emotional stress . Why ? Because the wrong decisions of her. You have a TERMINAL case she will denied your petition.
I am suffering of whole pain in my body, I am suffering emotional stress . Why ? Because the wrong decisions of her. You have a TERMINAL case she will denied your petition.
Some people's are saying negative stuff about judge Poulsbo but she was my judge and i don't agree to this nagstivety . She seems fair I don't know what went on in your case but something went wrong may be your evident toward your case or you lied about something and she called you out on it. Look before my case I Google this judge and i came across all this negativity about her and when my court date came around I was soooo scared that this judge so I went in the court room nervous and shaking in my shoes but I was truthful to the answers she asked. Then with all be in said she was not a bad judge so stop making people's nervous and scared with all this back lash if your case went wrong with her for what ever reason but if your not gone tell the entire story of your case to the point of the negative stuff keep your thought to yourself because it is terrifying to someone who has this judge for there case. I don't mean any harm I just know what the negativity did to me.
Some people's are saying negative stuff about judge Poulsbo but she was my judge and i don't agree to this nagstivety . She seems fair I don't know what went on in your case but something went wrong may be your evident toward your case or you lied about something and she called you out on it. Look before my case I Google this judge and i came across all this negativity about her and when my court date came around I was soooo scared that this judge so I went in the court room nervous and shaking in my shoes but I was truthful to the answers she asked. Then with all be in said she was not a bad judge so stop making people's nervous and scared with all this back lash if your case went wrong with her for what ever reason but if your not gone tell the entire story of your case to the point of the negative stuff keep your thought to yourself because it is terrifying to someone who has this judge for there case. I don't mean any harm I just know what the negativity did to me.
Some people's are saying negative stuff about judge Poulsbo but she was my judge and i don't agree to this nagstivety . She seems fair I don't know what went on in your case but something went wrong may be your evident toward your case or you lied about something and she called you out on it. Look before my case I Google this judge and i came across all this negativity about her and when my court date came around I was soooo scared that this judge so I went in the court room nervous and shaking in my shoes but I was truthful to the answers she asked. Then with all be in said she was not a bad judge so stop making people's nervous and scared with all this back lash if your case went wrong with her for what ever reason but if your not gone tell the entire story of your case to the point of the negative stuff keep your thought to yourself because it is terrifying to someone who has this judge for there case. I don't mean any harm I just know what the negativity did to me.
I agree with the last post. I think she was really nice and I felt very comfortable talking to her about my case. Haven't received my decision yet. Don't be fooled by everything you read.
I agree with the last post. I think she was really nice and I felt very comfortable talking to her about my case. Haven't received my decision yet. Don't be fooled by everything you read.
I agree with the last post. I think she was really nice and I felt very comfortable talking to her about my case. Haven't received my decision yet. Don't be fooled by everything you read.
She was my judge and she seem fair and nice to me.
She was my judge and she seem fair and nice to me.
She was my judge and she seem fair and nice to me.
Overly upset about my decision this judge has made learning that she is a former attorney turned judge judge Poulose really do not understand the cases or people she making decisions for maybe age has something to do with it I do not live in the Chicago IL area and she was my judge and looking through my paper work she does not ask the right questions or hyperthetical questions like she never asked “Do you do those activities on or off your medications” she never ask about medications anyway so how do she determines who has a disability claim or determines if you are not disabled when she does not ask the real questions.
Overly upset about my decision this judge has made learning that she is a former attorney turned judge judge Poulose really do not understand the cases or people she making decisions for maybe age has something to do with it I do not live in the Chicago IL area and she was my judge and looking through my paper work she does not ask the right questions or hyperthetical questions like she never asked “Do you do those activities on or off your medications” she never ask about medications anyway so how do she determines who has a disability claim or determines if you are not disabled when she does not ask the real questions.
Overly upset about my decision this judge has made learning that she is a former attorney turned judge judge Poulose really do not understand the cases or people she making decisions for maybe age has something to do with it I do not live in the Chicago IL area and she was my judge and looking through my paper work she does not ask the right questions or hyperthetical questions like she never asked “Do you do those activities on or off your medications” she never ask about medications anyway so how do she determines who has a disability claim or determines if you are not disabled when she does not ask the real questions.
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
THANK YOU JUDGE MARY ANN POULOSE , YOU APPROVED MY DISABILITY COMPENSATION , MY QUESTION IS THAT MY DISABILITY WAS MY BACK YOU GRANTED PARTIAL DISABILITY ( MEDICAL ) ( DIABETES ) SO DO I GET A PARCIAL FOR MY PHISICAL DISABILITY ( LUMBAR ( BACK ) .
generic viagra without a doctor prescription cheap generic viagra order viagra online
generic viagra without a doctor prescription cheap generic viagra order viagra online
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
Mercurial, self-important, and irritating.
Impossible to win a case in front of this man. 10% approval rating and 70% denial - how is this fair and just? He doesn't even deserve one star.
Impossible to win a case in front of this man. 10% approval rating and 70% denial - how is this fair and just? He doesn't even deserve one star.
Impossible to win a case in front of this man. 10% approval rating and 70% denial - how is this fair and just? He doesn't even deserve one star.
Judge Sanzi clearly makes himself familiar with the claim files. He puts a lot of thought into his decisions. If a claim is not meritorious, it won't be paid. That's just doing the job the right way.
Judge Sanzi clearly makes himself familiar with the claim files. He puts a lot of thought into his decisions. If a claim is not meritorious, it won't be paid. That's just doing the job the right way.
Judge Sanzi clearly makes himself familiar with the claim files. He puts a lot of thought into his decisions. If a claim is not meritorious, it won't be paid. That's just doing the job the right way.
Smart, fair, hardworking.
Smart, fair, hardworking.
Smart, fair, hardworking.
THIS MAN IS NOT FAIR AND MUST REALIZE DISABILITY CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE.
THIS MAN IS NOT FAIR AND MUST REALIZE DISABILITY CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE.
THIS MAN IS NOT FAIR AND MUST REALIZE DISABILITY CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE.
Always tries to make the right decision in each case, carefully applying the law as it is written, not as some reps might want it to be. Can't ask for more from a judge.
Always tries to make the right decision in each case, carefully applying the law as it is written, not as some reps might want it to be. Can't ask for more from a judge.
Always tries to make the right decision in each case, carefully applying the law as it is written, not as some reps might want it to be. Can't ask for more from a judge.
Judge Sanzi is dedicated to fairly applying the law to the facts of the case before him. That may not always result in an award of benefits, but he's just doing his job. He treats the claimants with respect.
Judge Sanzi is dedicated to fairly applying the law to the facts of the case before him. That may not always result in an award of benefits, but he's just doing his job. He treats the claimants with respect.
Judge Sanzi is dedicated to fairly applying the law to the facts of the case before him. That may not always result in an award of benefits, but he's just doing his job. He treats the claimants with respect.
Judge Sanzi clearly enjoys writing about himself on here. I have represented clients for 17 years before countless ALJ's. This man is utterly disgusting to appear before. He clearly has his mind made up before the hearing. He is in the top 3 worst judges I have appeared before. Sure not everyone deserves benefits but his approval rating is so unfair. People pay in but if you become disabled and have to appear before this moron you might as well forget getting your money out of the system. This judges record is going to ultimately cost him his job. Judge Sanzi shame on you, you should think of all the lives your ruining and start having some morals. FIND GOD, YES THERE IS A POWER GREATER THAN YOU, BEG FOR FORGIVENESS.
Judge Sanzi clearly enjoys writing about himself on here. I have represented clients for 17 years before countless ALJ's. This man is utterly disgusting to appear before. He clearly has his mind made up before the hearing. He is in the top 3 worst judges I have appeared before. Sure not everyone deserves benefits but his approval rating is so unfair. People pay in but if you become disabled and have to appear before this moron you might as well forget getting your money out of the system. This judges record is going to ultimately cost him his job. Judge Sanzi shame on you, you should think of all the lives your ruining and start having some morals. FIND GOD, YES THERE IS A POWER GREATER THAN YOU, BEG FOR FORGIVENESS.
Judge Sanzi clearly enjoys writing about himself on here. I have represented clients for 17 years before countless ALJ's. This man is utterly disgusting to appear before. He clearly has his mind made up before the hearing. He is in the top 3 worst judges I have appeared before. Sure not everyone deserves benefits but his approval rating is so unfair. People pay in but if you become disabled and have to appear before this moron you might as well forget getting your money out of the system. This judges record is going to ultimately cost him his job. Judge Sanzi shame on you, you should think of all the lives your ruining and start having some morals. FIND GOD, YES THERE IS A POWER GREATER THAN YOU, BEG FOR FORGIVENESS.
This man is clearly biased and unfair. Denied my husband even though none of the jobs in the national data base would work for him according to the vocational expert. Plays the system. My husband will be 50 soon so now that he has been determined to not be disabled, IF and I say IF he does get it at 50, there will probably be no back pay. Not fair, Not just. He is operating at 1/3 of the approval ratings as his peers. Time for a calibration to the standard. This is why people hate lawyers.
This man is clearly biased and unfair. Denied my husband even though none of the jobs in the national data base would work for him according to the vocational expert. Plays the system. My husband will be 50 soon so now that he has been determined to not be disabled, IF and I say IF he does get it at 50, there will probably be no back pay. Not fair, Not just. He is operating at 1/3 of the approval ratings as his peers. Time for a calibration to the standard. This is why people hate lawyers.
This man is clearly biased and unfair. Denied my husband even though none of the jobs in the national data base would work for him according to the vocational expert. Plays the system. My husband will be 50 soon so now that he has been determined to not be disabled, IF and I say IF he does get it at 50, there will probably be no back pay. Not fair, Not just. He is operating at 1/3 of the approval ratings as his peers. Time for a calibration to the standard. This is why people hate lawyers.
I had Judge Sanzi for my unrepresented hearing yesterday. After reading the comments on this page, I was in a severe depression and my anxiety almost prevented me from even attending my hearing. Judge Sanzi was the most personalable and nice person I could have expected to hear my case. I felt he was fair, he listened even if I started to go off on a tangent. I was terrified that this would be a tear-filled hour of disappointment but I have some confidence that my impairments will be understood and hopefully the law is in my favor. Crossing my fingers.
I had Judge Sanzi for my unrepresented hearing yesterday. After reading the comments on this page, I was in a severe depression and my anxiety almost prevented me from even attending my hearing. Judge Sanzi was the most personalable and nice person I could have expected to hear my case. I felt he was fair, he listened even if I started to go off on a tangent. I was terrified that this would be a tear-filled hour of disappointment but I have some confidence that my impairments will be understood and hopefully the law is in my favor. Crossing my fingers.
I had Judge Sanzi for my unrepresented hearing yesterday. After reading the comments on this page, I was in a severe depression and my anxiety almost prevented me from even attending my hearing. Judge Sanzi was the most personalable and nice person I could have expected to hear my case. I felt he was fair, he listened even if I started to go off on a tangent. I was terrified that this would be a tear-filled hour of disappointment but I have some confidence that my impairments will be understood and hopefully the law is in my favor. Crossing my fingers.
I personally had a pleasant and fair trial with him
I personally had a pleasant and fair trial with him
I personally had a pleasant and fair trial with him
I would be happy to appear before ALJ Sanzi any time. He conducts a logically organized, fair hearing. He treats both the claimant and the representative respectfully, ensures the claimant understands what is happening, encourages the the claimant to ask questions if he does not understand something. He gives no indication of having pre-judged the case or of just "going through the motions." He asks reasonable hypotheticals and doesn't go over the top with endless restrictions. He may rule against my claimant (after working with him and his "inaccurate" answers to my questions about work after onset, an unfavorable decision might even be appropriate), but he conducted a fair and impartial hearing. Just because an ALJ doesn't have a high allowance rate doesn't make him a bad judge or an evil person. Get a grip. If he makes his decisions the way he conducts his hearings, then he will make reasoned determinations that he will support with his findings from the file and the testimony. And he may, therefore, deny claims. He's doing his job.
I would be happy to appear before ALJ Sanzi any time. He conducts a logically organized, fair hearing. He treats both the claimant and the representative respectfully, ensures the claimant understands what is happening, encourages the the claimant to ask questions if he does not understand something. He gives no indication of having pre-judged the case or of just "going through the motions." He asks reasonable hypotheticals and doesn't go over the top with endless restrictions. He may rule against my claimant (after working with him and his "inaccurate" answers to my questions about work after onset, an unfavorable decision might even be appropriate), but he conducted a fair and impartial hearing. Just because an ALJ doesn't have a high allowance rate doesn't make him a bad judge or an evil person. Get a grip. If he makes his decisions the way he conducts his hearings, then he will make reasoned determinations that he will support with his findings from the file and the testimony. And he may, therefore, deny claims. He's doing his job.
I would be happy to appear before ALJ Sanzi any time. He conducts a logically organized, fair hearing. He treats both the claimant and the representative respectfully, ensures the claimant understands what is happening, encourages the the claimant to ask questions if he does not understand something. He gives no indication of having pre-judged the case or of just "going through the motions." He asks reasonable hypotheticals and doesn't go over the top with endless restrictions. He may rule against my claimant (after working with him and his "inaccurate" answers to my questions about work after onset, an unfavorable decision might even be appropriate), but he conducted a fair and impartial hearing. Just because an ALJ doesn't have a high allowance rate doesn't make him a bad judge or an evil person. Get a grip. If he makes his decisions the way he conducts his hearings, then he will make reasoned determinations that he will support with his findings from the file and the testimony. And he may, therefore, deny claims. He's doing his job.
I NEVER THOUGHT A JUDGE COULD USE HIS OWN OPINION OF WHAT IS OR ISN'T AN ILLNESS EVEN WHEN IT IS PROVEN BY DOCTOR'S TESTOMY AND RECORDS. THIS MAN SHOULD BE EDUCATED IN ALL TYPES OF DISABILITIES, EVEN ONES ABOVE THE NECK. YOUR BRAIN CONTROLS EVERYTHING YOUR BODY DOES, YET HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN MENTAL ILLNESS, IT'S ALL IN YOUR HEAD. MAYBE HE SHOULD SPEAK TO VETS AND FIND OUT WHAT PTSD IS, MAYBE HE SHOULD HAVE A PANIC ATTACK OR NOT BE ABLE TO SLEEP FOR DAYS IN A ROW. MAYBE HE SHOULD TAKE MEDICATIONS THAT RELIEVE THE SYMTOMS BUT CAUSE HORRIBLE SIDE EFFECTS....OR MAYBE HE SHOULD STOP PLAYING GOD.
I NEVER THOUGHT A JUDGE COULD USE HIS OWN OPINION OF WHAT IS OR ISN'T AN ILLNESS EVEN WHEN IT IS PROVEN BY DOCTOR'S TESTOMY AND RECORDS. THIS MAN SHOULD BE EDUCATED IN ALL TYPES OF DISABILITIES, EVEN ONES ABOVE THE NECK. YOUR BRAIN CONTROLS EVERYTHING YOUR BODY DOES, YET HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN MENTAL ILLNESS, IT'S ALL IN YOUR HEAD. MAYBE HE SHOULD SPEAK TO VETS AND FIND OUT WHAT PTSD IS, MAYBE HE SHOULD HAVE A PANIC ATTACK OR NOT BE ABLE TO SLEEP FOR DAYS IN A ROW. MAYBE HE SHOULD TAKE MEDICATIONS THAT RELIEVE THE SYMTOMS BUT CAUSE HORRIBLE SIDE EFFECTS....OR MAYBE HE SHOULD STOP PLAYING GOD.
I NEVER THOUGHT A JUDGE COULD USE HIS OWN OPINION OF WHAT IS OR ISN'T AN ILLNESS EVEN WHEN IT IS PROVEN BY DOCTOR'S TESTOMY AND RECORDS. THIS MAN SHOULD BE EDUCATED IN ALL TYPES OF DISABILITIES, EVEN ONES ABOVE THE NECK. YOUR BRAIN CONTROLS EVERYTHING YOUR BODY DOES, YET HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN MENTAL ILLNESS, IT'S ALL IN YOUR HEAD. MAYBE HE SHOULD SPEAK TO VETS AND FIND OUT WHAT PTSD IS, MAYBE HE SHOULD HAVE A PANIC ATTACK OR NOT BE ABLE TO SLEEP FOR DAYS IN A ROW. MAYBE HE SHOULD TAKE MEDICATIONS THAT RELIEVE THE SYMTOMS BUT CAUSE HORRIBLE SIDE EFFECTS....OR MAYBE HE SHOULD STOP PLAYING GOD.
Follow-up comment now that I've received Judge Sanzi's decision on my claimant's case: Decision is well-written, concise, clear so that most claimant's could understand it. In spite of the fact the my claimant hid his/her return to work after the initial onset date, Judge Sanzi still gave him/her the benefit of the doubt. But based on his/her age, a sedentary rating equaled a finding of "not disabled." Not the decision I wanted for my claimant, but a well-reasoned and appropriate one. Will probably never appear before him again, but still believe he was fair, respectful, professional.
Follow-up comment now that I've received Judge Sanzi's decision on my claimant's case: Decision is well-written, concise, clear so that most claimant's could understand it. In spite of the fact the my claimant hid his/her return to work after the initial onset date, Judge Sanzi still gave him/her the benefit of the doubt. But based on his/her age, a sedentary rating equaled a finding of "not disabled." Not the decision I wanted for my claimant, but a well-reasoned and appropriate one. Will probably never appear before him again, but still believe he was fair, respectful, professional.
Follow-up comment now that I've received Judge Sanzi's decision on my claimant's case: Decision is well-written, concise, clear so that most claimant's could understand it. In spite of the fact the my claimant hid his/her return to work after the initial onset date, Judge Sanzi still gave him/her the benefit of the doubt. But based on his/her age, a sedentary rating equaled a finding of "not disabled." Not the decision I wanted for my claimant, but a well-reasoned and appropriate one. Will probably never appear before him again, but still believe he was fair, respectful, professional.
I wonder how long it takes to get a decision back because I've been waiting for over a month and haven't got a letter or anything back can anybody give me a ballpark and how long it takes thank you . because I just told the judge I really didn't care about the disability check with a bag but check all I really needed was insurance because my health is in bad shape.
I wonder how long it takes to get a decision back because I've been waiting for over a month and haven't got a letter or anything back can anybody give me a ballpark and how long it takes thank you . because I just told the judge I really didn't care about the disability check with a bag but check all I really needed was insurance because my health is in bad shape.
I wonder how long it takes to get a decision back because I've been waiting for over a month and haven't got a letter or anything back can anybody give me a ballpark and how long it takes thank you . because I just told the judge I really didn't care about the disability check with a bag but check all I really needed was insurance because my health is in bad shape.
"Your A Good Man Mr. Thomas J. Sanzi!" "If I Ever Need Legal Advice Or Representation You Will Be The First One I Would Call!""Family First!"
"Your A Good Man Mr. Thomas J. Sanzi!" "If I Ever Need Legal Advice Or Representation You Will Be The First One I Would Call!""Family First!"
"Your A Good Man Mr. Thomas J. Sanzi!" "If I Ever Need Legal Advice Or Representation You Will Be The First One I Would Call!""Family First!"
Thank God Sanzi is no longer in Wisconsin. He cannnot waste anymore of anyones time here. He is not worthy of being a disability judge. Another commentator was absolutely correct. He makes a judgement before the hearing. He is a narcistic person. All the 5 stars on this page are his own. Shows his narcistic behavior. How many times have you been remanded Sanzi? Sure felt good to see at least one in my favor. Glad you got the boot out of WI. You are not fair and obviously your interpretation of the law and yourself isn't working so well for you. Keep on it and hopefully will see you lose your seat on the bench. I feel sorry for the IL folks who get the unpleasant experience of sitting before your arrogance and ignorance. Those that live with a disability know what I am talking about. You won't until it someday comes upon you. I would not wish it on anyone. Grow some understanding and get it right for once.
Thank God Sanzi is no longer in Wisconsin. He cannnot waste anymore of anyones time here. He is not worthy of being a disability judge. Another commentator was absolutely correct. He makes a judgement before the hearing. He is a narcistic person. All the 5 stars on this page are his own. Shows his narcistic behavior. How many times have you been remanded Sanzi? Sure felt good to see at least one in my favor. Glad you got the boot out of WI. You are not fair and obviously your interpretation of the law and yourself isn't working so well for you. Keep on it and hopefully will see you lose your seat on the bench. I feel sorry for the IL folks who get the unpleasant experience of sitting before your arrogance and ignorance. Those that live with a disability know what I am talking about. You won't until it someday comes upon you. I would not wish it on anyone. Grow some understanding and get it right for once.
Thank God Sanzi is no longer in Wisconsin. He cannnot waste anymore of anyones time here. He is not worthy of being a disability judge. Another commentator was absolutely correct. He makes a judgement before the hearing. He is a narcistic person. All the 5 stars on this page are his own. Shows his narcistic behavior. How many times have you been remanded Sanzi? Sure felt good to see at least one in my favor. Glad you got the boot out of WI. You are not fair and obviously your interpretation of the law and yourself isn't working so well for you. Keep on it and hopefully will see you lose your seat on the bench. I feel sorry for the IL folks who get the unpleasant experience of sitting before your arrogance and ignorance. Those that live with a disability know what I am talking about. You won't until it someday comes upon you. I would not wish it on anyone. Grow some understanding and get it right for once.
He comes off sort of eccentric and rather unprofessional for a Judge. It doesn't seem like he is paying attention to your testimony at all. Also I dont get the impression he read my medical records either. I think he just wants to deny people and doesn't care about much otherwise. Also if you have him for a video hearing he leaves the screen multiple times, it's really strange.
He comes off sort of eccentric and rather unprofessional for a Judge. It doesn't seem like he is paying attention to your testimony at all. Also I dont get the impression he read my medical records either. I think he just wants to deny people and doesn't care about much otherwise. Also if you have him for a video hearing he leaves the screen multiple times, it's really strange.
He comes off sort of eccentric and rather unprofessional for a Judge. It doesn't seem like he is paying attention to your testimony at all. Also I dont get the impression he read my medical records either. I think he just wants to deny people and doesn't care about much otherwise. Also if you have him for a video hearing he leaves the screen multiple times, it's really strange.
I think it's wonderful that Judge Sanzi and his staff care enough about the comments to write their own and post them. Thought the one from the lawyer who thinks it was cool to deny his client was a little far-fetched (and poorly written), but kudos to the staff for imagining this is how we might feel about out clients. Again, a 16% approval rate (two standard deviations below the average) speaks volumes to his approach and "fairness."
I think it's wonderful that Judge Sanzi and his staff care enough about the comments to write their own and post them. Thought the one from the lawyer who thinks it was cool to deny his client was a little far-fetched (and poorly written), but kudos to the staff for imagining this is how we might feel about out clients. Again, a 16% approval rate (two standard deviations below the average) speaks volumes to his approach and "fairness."
I think it's wonderful that Judge Sanzi and his staff care enough about the comments to write their own and post them. Thought the one from the lawyer who thinks it was cool to deny his client was a little far-fetched (and poorly written), but kudos to the staff for imagining this is how we might feel about out clients. Again, a 16% approval rate (two standard deviations below the average) speaks volumes to his approach and "fairness."
He doesn't approve cases that are very strong. I've done hundreds and hundreds of cases and the case I had before him was very obvious and well deserving. Client had been in a diabetic coma and was sent to a nursing home afterwards and received home health aide services. But the ALJ argued he could do very physically hard work still! It just doesnt make sense and seems it will be an appeal. If only we had a different ALJ my client would of been approved. I'm sorry but there's no way only 17% of the cases he sees deserve benefits and the other 83% don't. It's pretty ridiculous! Also there's other ways to get approved for SSDI/SSI than meeting the listing, he doesn't seem to really accept that! Like having a combination of multiple impairments that equal listing level or not being able to do sedentary work. Another, fair ALJ would of approved my client on either one of those factors.
He doesn't approve cases that are very strong. I've done hundreds and hundreds of cases and the case I had before him was very obvious and well deserving. Client had been in a diabetic coma and was sent to a nursing home afterwards and received home health aide services. But the ALJ argued he could do very physically hard work still! It just doesnt make sense and seems it will be an appeal. If only we had a different ALJ my client would of been approved. I'm sorry but there's no way only 17% of the cases he sees deserve benefits and the other 83% don't. It's pretty ridiculous! Also there's other ways to get approved for SSDI/SSI than meeting the listing, he doesn't seem to really accept that! Like having a combination of multiple impairments that equal listing level or not being able to do sedentary work. Another, fair ALJ would of approved my client on either one of those factors.
He doesn't approve cases that are very strong. I've done hundreds and hundreds of cases and the case I had before him was very obvious and well deserving. Client had been in a diabetic coma and was sent to a nursing home afterwards and received home health aide services. But the ALJ argued he could do very physically hard work still! It just doesnt make sense and seems it will be an appeal. If only we had a different ALJ my client would of been approved. I'm sorry but there's no way only 17% of the cases he sees deserve benefits and the other 83% don't. It's pretty ridiculous! Also there's other ways to get approved for SSDI/SSI than meeting the listing, he doesn't seem to really accept that! Like having a combination of multiple impairments that equal listing level or not being able to do sedentary work. Another, fair ALJ would of approved my client on either one of those factors.
This judge denied that I had stenosis. I have medical records that prove that I do have it. Completely ignored that I have 3 herniated discs in my neck along with stenosis, as well as stenosis of my spine. Facts were completely ignored. According to him I can be retrained to enter the workforce despite my age being 62 and I wear a back brace and walk with a cane. I am sure a prospective employer would really take me seriously. Sure. Absolutely disgraceful.
This judge denied that I had stenosis. I have medical records that prove that I do have it. Completely ignored that I have 3 herniated discs in my neck along with stenosis, as well as stenosis of my spine. Facts were completely ignored. According to him I can be retrained to enter the workforce despite my age being 62 and I wear a back brace and walk with a cane. I am sure a prospective employer would really take me seriously. Sure. Absolutely disgraceful.
This judge denied that I had stenosis. I have medical records that prove that I do have it. Completely ignored that I have 3 herniated discs in my neck along with stenosis, as well as stenosis of my spine. Facts were completely ignored. According to him I can be retrained to enter the workforce despite my age being 62 and I wear a back brace and walk with a cane. I am sure a prospective employer would really take me seriously. Sure. Absolutely disgraceful.
I appeared before the Honorable Judge Sanzi on 1/5/18 via video hearing regarding my disability case. He approved my case as partially favorable, which I greatly appreciate. However, he made my onset date the same date of his decision on 7/10/18. I went in to the SSI office to find out what my options are. The SSA rep stated that she has never seen a judge make the onset the same date of his decision in the 17 years she has been working for SSA. I do not want to appeal because I have already been waiting for over 3 years for a decision. I sent a certified letter to his office in August 2018 and have not heard anything back. I have tried calling the office and when I finally was able to reach someone she gave me a number to call in Florida that was disconnected. This onset date affects everything, especially my waiting period for Medicare, which I desperately need. PLEASE HELP! Thank you in advance for taking the time to review my case.
I appeared before the Honorable Judge Sanzi on 1/5/18 via video hearing regarding my disability case. He approved my case as partially favorable, which I greatly appreciate. However, he made my onset date the same date of his decision on 7/10/18. I went in to the SSI office to find out what my options are. The SSA rep stated that she has never seen a judge make the onset the same date of his decision in the 17 years she has been working for SSA. I do not want to appeal because I have already been waiting for over 3 years for a decision. I sent a certified letter to his office in August 2018 and have not heard anything back. I have tried calling the office and when I finally was able to reach someone she gave me a number to call in Florida that was disconnected. This onset date affects everything, especially my waiting period for Medicare, which I desperately need. PLEASE HELP! Thank you in advance for taking the time to review my case.
I appeared before the Honorable Judge Sanzi on 1/5/18 via video hearing regarding my disability case. He approved my case as partially favorable, which I greatly appreciate. However, he made my onset date the same date of his decision on 7/10/18. I went in to the SSI office to find out what my options are. The SSA rep stated that she has never seen a judge make the onset the same date of his decision in the 17 years she has been working for SSA. I do not want to appeal because I have already been waiting for over 3 years for a decision. I sent a certified letter to his office in August 2018 and have not heard anything back. I have tried calling the office and when I finally was able to reach someone she gave me a number to call in Florida that was disconnected. This onset date affects everything, especially my waiting period for Medicare, which I desperately need. PLEASE HELP! Thank you in advance for taking the time to review my case.
mail order viagra buying viagra online cvs viagra
mail order viagra buying viagra online cvs viagra
Decent, hardworking, fair judge. Will do the right thing.
Decent, hardworking, fair judge. Will do the right thing.
Decent, hardworking, fair judge. Will do the right thing.
I went to my disability hearing on Aug 8-2017. My daughter brought the mail in today and there was the envelope from social security disability administration. As I looked at the envelope so afraid to open it and be upset because I thought I would be denied for the third time. My daughter said mom open it and have some faith. I have been a diabetic since I was 8 and I am now 35. I go to my doctor's on a regular basis and they adjust my medication regularly hoping it will make things better but it doesn't seem to work. I follow my diet and do what I am told but it doesn't work no matter what I do. I haven't been able to work for over 3 yrs due to my illness. It's very depressing because it makes me feel worthless. I have 3 children and life has been very hard for many years. I thank God for my amazing 19 year old daughter who is extremely responsible. I opened the envelope and it was a fully favorable decision. I thank you Kathleen Scully Hayes. You truly are a very caring and fair individual. You listened to what I had to say and took the time to go over the medical evidence to support what I told you and I thank you for giving me the opportunity to allow me to not feel like a burden or worthless any more...
I went to my disability hearing on Aug 8-2017. My daughter brought the mail in today and there was the envelope from social security disability administration. As I looked at the envelope so afraid to open it and be upset because I thought I would be denied for the third time. My daughter said mom open it and have some faith. I have been a diabetic since I was 8 and I am now 35. I go to my doctor's on a regular basis and they adjust my medication regularly hoping it will make things better but it doesn't seem to work. I follow my diet and do what I am told but it doesn't work no matter what I do. I haven't been able to work for over 3 yrs due to my illness. It's very depressing because it makes me feel worthless. I have 3 children and life has been very hard for many years. I thank God for my amazing 19 year old daughter who is extremely responsible. I opened the envelope and it was a fully favorable decision. I thank you Kathleen Scully Hayes. You truly are a very caring and fair individual. You listened to what I had to say and took the time to go over the medical evidence to support what I told you and I thank you for giving me the opportunity to allow me to not feel like a burden or worthless any more...
I went to my disability hearing on Aug 8-2017. My daughter brought the mail in today and there was the envelope from social security disability administration. As I looked at the envelope so afraid to open it and be upset because I thought I would be denied for the third time. My daughter said mom open it and have some faith. I have been a diabetic since I was 8 and I am now 35. I go to my doctor's on a regular basis and they adjust my medication regularly hoping it will make things better but it doesn't seem to work. I follow my diet and do what I am told but it doesn't work no matter what I do. I haven't been able to work for over 3 yrs due to my illness. It's very depressing because it makes me feel worthless. I have 3 children and life has been very hard for many years. I thank God for my amazing 19 year old daughter who is extremely responsible. I opened the envelope and it was a fully favorable decision. I thank you Kathleen Scully Hayes. You truly are a very caring and fair individual. You listened to what I had to say and took the time to go over the medical evidence to support what I told you and I thank you for giving me the opportunity to allow me to not feel like a burden or worthless any more...
Very fair judge
Very fair judge
Very fair judge
viagra online canadian pharmacy buy viagra viagra cost per pill
viagra online canadian pharmacy buy viagra viagra cost per pill
5 Doctors in medical records said due to my spinal injury I could not due any substantial work, and one Doctor said i was unfit for any type of work. " Judge" Sharrard ruled UNFAVORABLE against me, stated that i could perform as a laundry mat assistant. I worked several years as a High skilled Welder & Fabricator...thanks for denying my disability that is all i had. My unemployment ran out because NO ONE WOULD HIRE ME due to my MEDICAL condition, this includes Laundry mats. What a joke our system is that allows someone to deny your ENTITLEMENT that i paid into for 31 years. Now i will have to apply for government assistance to feed my family, and i am now a tax burden instead of a consumer, thanks for treating me like a 16 year old kid. yes its being appealed by a new more competent attorney, that said he couldn't believe i didn't receive my disability with all my medical records, and the Attorney said these judges deny cases to help their career. Hope you sleep well at night ruining peoples lives !@
5 Doctors in medical records said due to my spinal injury I could not due any substantial work, and one Doctor said i was unfit for any type of work. " Judge" Sharrard ruled UNFAVORABLE against me, stated that i could perform as a laundry mat assistant. I worked several years as a High skilled Welder & Fabricator...thanks for denying my disability that is all i had. My unemployment ran out because NO ONE WOULD HIRE ME due to my MEDICAL condition, this includes Laundry mats. What a joke our system is that allows someone to deny your ENTITLEMENT that i paid into for 31 years. Now i will have to apply for government assistance to feed my family, and i am now a tax burden instead of a consumer, thanks for treating me like a 16 year old kid. yes its being appealed by a new more competent attorney, that said he couldn't believe i didn't receive my disability with all my medical records, and the Attorney said these judges deny cases to help their career. Hope you sleep well at night ruining peoples lives !@
5 Doctors in medical records said due to my spinal injury I could not due any substantial work, and one Doctor said i was unfit for any type of work. " Judge" Sharrard ruled UNFAVORABLE against me, stated that i could perform as a laundry mat assistant. I worked several years as a High skilled Welder & Fabricator...thanks for denying my disability that is all i had. My unemployment ran out because NO ONE WOULD HIRE ME due to my MEDICAL condition, this includes Laundry mats. What a joke our system is that allows someone to deny your ENTITLEMENT that i paid into for 31 years. Now i will have to apply for government assistance to feed my family, and i am now a tax burden instead of a consumer, thanks for treating me like a 16 year old kid. yes its being appealed by a new more competent attorney, that said he couldn't believe i didn't receive my disability with all my medical records, and the Attorney said these judges deny cases to help their career. Hope you sleep well at night ruining peoples lives !@
You denied me knowing i am disabled, 4 Doctors said i was, and I can't drive but a little. Now i will file Bankruptcy and apply for Government assistance. I was a 30 year worker and was injured on the job. Haven't worked in 4 years. My family thanks you for your compassion. hope you get your promotion for another denial !
You denied me knowing i am disabled, 4 Doctors said i was, and I can't drive but a little. Now i will file Bankruptcy and apply for Government assistance. I was a 30 year worker and was injured on the job. Haven't worked in 4 years. My family thanks you for your compassion. hope you get your promotion for another denial !
You denied me knowing i am disabled, 4 Doctors said i was, and I can't drive but a little. Now i will file Bankruptcy and apply for Government assistance. I was a 30 year worker and was injured on the job. Haven't worked in 4 years. My family thanks you for your compassion. hope you get your promotion for another denial !
Judge Sharrard has that certain judicial je ne sais quoi that enables her to efficiently preside over hearings, bringing her to the best conclusion in the case. She is firm, but very nice, even though she doesn't pay everybody.
Judge Sharrard has that certain judicial je ne sais quoi that enables her to efficiently preside over hearings, bringing her to the best conclusion in the case. She is firm, but very nice, even though she doesn't pay everybody.
Judge Sharrard has that certain judicial je ne sais quoi that enables her to efficiently preside over hearings, bringing her to the best conclusion in the case. She is firm, but very nice, even though she doesn't pay everybody.
I have not been able to work in 4 years since a spinal cord injury, Several doctors ( surgeons ) stated i was unable to work due to my severe medical condition. I met & exceeded all requirements for disability that i have paid into for 30 years. Judge Sharrard ruled against me giving me an unfavorable decision, saying i could perform as a " Cashier" most days i do not leave my home due to my inability to drive. This judge and others care nothing about the facts or the people. I hope someone actually reads this and gets something out of this. If you are assigned this judge to hear your case i would recommend someone else due to her record of ruling against people, she must be looking for a promotion I speculate that is the way to move up denying cases no matter the facts. Arrogant judges ! hope they get to answer someday for their actions !!!
I have not been able to work in 4 years since a spinal cord injury, Several doctors ( surgeons ) stated i was unable to work due to my severe medical condition. I met & exceeded all requirements for disability that i have paid into for 30 years. Judge Sharrard ruled against me giving me an unfavorable decision, saying i could perform as a " Cashier" most days i do not leave my home due to my inability to drive. This judge and others care nothing about the facts or the people. I hope someone actually reads this and gets something out of this. If you are assigned this judge to hear your case i would recommend someone else due to her record of ruling against people, she must be looking for a promotion I speculate that is the way to move up denying cases no matter the facts. Arrogant judges ! hope they get to answer someday for their actions !!!
I have not been able to work in 4 years since a spinal cord injury, Several doctors ( surgeons ) stated i was unable to work due to my severe medical condition. I met & exceeded all requirements for disability that i have paid into for 30 years. Judge Sharrard ruled against me giving me an unfavorable decision, saying i could perform as a " Cashier" most days i do not leave my home due to my inability to drive. This judge and others care nothing about the facts or the people. I hope someone actually reads this and gets something out of this. If you are assigned this judge to hear your case i would recommend someone else due to her record of ruling against people, she must be looking for a promotion I speculate that is the way to move up denying cases no matter the facts. Arrogant judges ! hope they get to answer someday for their actions !!!
Had my hearing from Judge Sharrard, yes i received an unfavorable( no disability ) 3 years of doctors, rehab, and unable to drive. 4 Doctors said i would be unable to perform an substantial work due to my PERMANENT damage to my spinal cord. After 31 years working as a skilled laborer, this is what you get. Judge Sharrard had no intention of awarding what i was intitled to no matter what the facts. Guess she had a quota for the day. Is their any one that oversees theses arrogant Judges. Now i will apply for welfare, link card and all the rest. I will now cost more than if she would have done the right thing and awarded what should have been given to me. THANKS FOR NOTHING !
Had my hearing from Judge Sharrard, yes i received an unfavorable( no disability ) 3 years of doctors, rehab, and unable to drive. 4 Doctors said i would be unable to perform an substantial work due to my PERMANENT damage to my spinal cord. After 31 years working as a skilled laborer, this is what you get. Judge Sharrard had no intention of awarding what i was intitled to no matter what the facts. Guess she had a quota for the day. Is their any one that oversees theses arrogant Judges. Now i will apply for welfare, link card and all the rest. I will now cost more than if she would have done the right thing and awarded what should have been given to me. THANKS FOR NOTHING !
Had my hearing from Judge Sharrard, yes i received an unfavorable( no disability ) 3 years of doctors, rehab, and unable to drive. 4 Doctors said i would be unable to perform an substantial work due to my PERMANENT damage to my spinal cord. After 31 years working as a skilled laborer, this is what you get. Judge Sharrard had no intention of awarding what i was intitled to no matter what the facts. Guess she had a quota for the day. Is their any one that oversees theses arrogant Judges. Now i will apply for welfare, link card and all the rest. I will now cost more than if she would have done the right thing and awarded what should have been given to me. THANKS FOR NOTHING !
Does anyone check the facts in a case, this judge ignored medical depositions given by 4 Surgeons saying my medical condition prevented me from being employed, however Judge Sharrard felt different about it. She decided i could work, not the Doctors. Yes an unfavorable decision after 30 years working. 4 months later still can't work, 4 years after my injury still not working. I will apply for welfare because of her denying my benefit, does anyone ever read this or care. hope someday she will suffer as i have
Does anyone check the facts in a case, this judge ignored medical depositions given by 4 Surgeons saying my medical condition prevented me from being employed, however Judge Sharrard felt different about it. She decided i could work, not the Doctors. Yes an unfavorable decision after 30 years working. 4 months later still can't work, 4 years after my injury still not working. I will apply for welfare because of her denying my benefit, does anyone ever read this or care. hope someday she will suffer as i have
Does anyone check the facts in a case, this judge ignored medical depositions given by 4 Surgeons saying my medical condition prevented me from being employed, however Judge Sharrard felt different about it. She decided i could work, not the Doctors. Yes an unfavorable decision after 30 years working. 4 months later still can't work, 4 years after my injury still not working. I will apply for welfare because of her denying my benefit, does anyone ever read this or care. hope someday she will suffer as i have
Why does a " Judge " Anne Sharrard rule on my Disability ? 4 Doctors gave a deposition that I was unable to work to a spinal injury that is permanent. " Judge" Sharrard ruled against me saying i was employable, really I haven't worked in 4 years after 23 years as a skilled laborer. What gives these people the right to deny my ENTITLEMENT ! guess she is also a " Doctor" WHAT A JOKE THIS **** SYSTEM IS...I HOPE YOU GET YOUR PROMOTION ! OUR GOVERNMENT SUCKS !
Why does a " Judge " Anne Sharrard rule on my Disability ? 4 Doctors gave a deposition that I was unable to work to a spinal injury that is permanent. " Judge" Sharrard ruled against me saying i was employable, really I haven't worked in 4 years after 23 years as a skilled laborer. What gives these people the right to deny my ENTITLEMENT ! guess she is also a " Doctor" WHAT A JOKE THIS **** SYSTEM IS...I HOPE YOU GET YOUR PROMOTION ! OUR GOVERNMENT SUCKS !