ORANGE, California Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Orange, CALIFORNIA, 14 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Orange, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 18 months. The average case processing time in Orange is 590 days. The Orange average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 42%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Orange ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORANGE | 14 | 18.0 months | 590 days | 2.4 | 21% | 42% | 38% |
| CALIFORNIA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.00 months | 2.36 | 590 days | 2330 | 1930 | 137 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 31
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacy Zimmerman | 34% | 22% | 45% |
| John W Wojciechowski | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Wendy Weber | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sharon L Turner | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Elizab Stevens Bentley | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Charles E Stevenson | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Janice E Shave | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Claudi L Rosen-Underwood | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Wynne O'Brien-Persons | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kevin M McCormick | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Alan J Markiewicz | 44% | 21% | 35% |
| Christine Long | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Joseph P Lisiecki III | 49% | 19% | 32% |
| Joseph Lisiecki | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kelly B Lind | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Robert Lenzini | 48% | 19% | 33% |
| Jean R Kerins | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John Kays | 52% | 22% | 26% |
| Sharilyn Hopson | 37% | 22% | 41% |
| Joan Ho | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Helen E Hesse | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mason D Harrell | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Myriam C Fernandez Rice | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Milan M Dostal | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Keith Dietterle | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Carolyn Cohn-Morros | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Susanne M Cichanowicz | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Barry S Brown | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Betty J Barbeito | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kenneth E Ball | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kyle E Andeer | 0% | 0% | 0% |
384 Comments
Andeer seems to have a good professional relationship with his assistant and the VE. I just had my hearing and my attorney said it can go either way. I now wait impatiently and pray for a positive outcome in a timely manner. All in all, it was uncomfortable, as anticipated, but not unpleasant.
Andeer seems to have a good professional relationship with his assistant and the VE. I just had my hearing and my attorney said it can go either way. I now wait impatiently and pray for a positive outcome in a timely manner. All in all, it was uncomfortable, as anticipated, but not unpleasant.
Andeer seems to have a good professional relationship with his assistant and the VE. I just had my hearing and my attorney said it can go either way. I now wait impatiently and pray for a positive outcome in a timely manner. All in all, it was uncomfortable, as anticipated, but not unpleasant.
How long did it take before you hear back from the hearing office? Were you approved? Thanks.
How long did it take before you hear back from the hearing office? Were you approved? Thanks.
How long did it take before you hear back from the hearing office? Were you approved? Thanks.
I attended a hearing with Mr. Answer, he was pleasant enough but felt more like the dating game! I had many questions that weren't answered! My case was denied after 41/2 years of investigation. I had to wonder why my case was pending out of San Jose being I live in OC very disappointing! I know there was also two different case #s. Well I guess I will see him and his assistant Mike again if ever sking in mammoth. What I was looking for was a legitimate trial for a very legitimate case pending December 2011. All I received was a denial and to write to pike st in Virginia! WTF? So good luck. I'm not the stars! Sorry I'm just not better (well)
I attended a hearing with Mr. Answer, he was pleasant enough but felt more like the dating game! I had many questions that weren't answered! My case was denied after 41/2 years of investigation. I had to wonder why my case was pending out of San Jose being I live in OC very disappointing! I know there was also two different case #s. Well I guess I will see him and his assistant Mike again if ever sking in mammoth. What I was looking for was a legitimate trial for a very legitimate case pending December 2011. All I received was a denial and to write to pike st in Virginia! WTF? So good luck. I'm not the stars! Sorry I'm just not better (well)
I attended a hearing with Mr. Answer, he was pleasant enough but felt more like the dating game! I had many questions that weren't answered! My case was denied after 41/2 years of investigation. I had to wonder why my case was pending out of San Jose being I live in OC very disappointing! I know there was also two different case #s. Well I guess I will see him and his assistant Mike again if ever sking in mammoth. What I was looking for was a legitimate trial for a very legitimate case pending December 2011. All I received was a denial and to write to pike st in Virginia! WTF? So good luck. I'm not the stars! Sorry I'm just not better (well)
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems cocky and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems cocky and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems cocky and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems arrogant and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems arrogant and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He is new to Santa Barbara and scratched his head about paper's saying I'm stage 4 which means 85% of the time of anything I can't do. I don't get why that's a head scratcher. He is a nice man. Seems arrogant and you will have to wait 90 to 120 day's before you get a decision. All evidence says NO. But expect a NO. New and doesn't seem to get medical records at all. Still waiting and hope he makes the right decision but you know SSI judges. They go off statistics for the fiscal year and have to keep a average or don't give a **** at all. Also political bias and age discriminate happens in SSI. THAT'S NOT THIS JUDGE'S PROBLEM that I know of. Just new, make you wait forever and is nice in the court room. Can also be funny. But doesn't seem to get anything. He asked the man can he work the 3 bad job's SSI said I can and they had to say NO. 20 doctor's say NO. Stage 4 on everything. Kinda a EASY decision but have to see. SSI will never care about the disabled or there problems period.
He has no grasp on reality. He cares more about a lawyer's foot than you. Over 20 doctors and 6 year's and he still says no. He is politically bias and discriminates. He shouldn't even be on the bench. He doesn't look at any evidence. He will lpoker back at pass cases all doctors saying I can't work and scratched his stupid head and just says uh wow all three are stage 4 which means no work possible but somehow goes to the last case and goes off that. Not anything new. We all know these judge's are corrupt. Dope heads get it with ease. A guy said he heard voices and got it. Guess the only way to win is huff air, do drugs and say you hear voices. 20 doctors and a NO. It's because of my age and sex.Only and his ****** STATS HE HAS TO KEEP ON CHECK FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. See them on the site. It's pathetic and he does Hawaii as well as Santa Barbara. That should make him not a judge right there. He's just as bad as Mary and Roger but acts nice. I posted the 3 star on him but I guess I was wroung. All just a show. He puts no effort in any thing. Sad and it ruins people's life's and maybe he gets off on that playing GOD with people's lives
He has no grasp on reality. He cares more about a lawyer's foot than you. Over 20 doctors and 6 year's and he still says no. He is politically bias and discriminates. He shouldn't even be on the bench. He doesn't look at any evidence. He will lpoker back at pass cases all doctors saying I can't work and scratched his stupid head and just says uh wow all three are stage 4 which means no work possible but somehow goes to the last case and goes off that. Not anything new. We all know these judge's are corrupt. Dope heads get it with ease. A guy said he heard voices and got it. Guess the only way to win is huff air, do drugs and say you hear voices. 20 doctors and a NO. It's because of my age and sex.Only and his ****** STATS HE HAS TO KEEP ON CHECK FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. See them on the site. It's pathetic and he does Hawaii as well as Santa Barbara. That should make him not a judge right there. He's just as bad as Mary and Roger but acts nice. I posted the 3 star on him but I guess I was wroung. All just a show. He puts no effort in any thing. Sad and it ruins people's life's and maybe he gets off on that playing GOD with people's lives
He has no grasp on reality. He cares more about a lawyer's foot than you. Over 20 doctors and 6 year's and he still says no. He is politically bias and discriminates. He shouldn't even be on the bench. He doesn't look at any evidence. He will lpoker back at pass cases all doctors saying I can't work and scratched his stupid head and just says uh wow all three are stage 4 which means no work possible but somehow goes to the last case and goes off that. Not anything new. We all know these judge's are corrupt. Dope heads get it with ease. A guy said he heard voices and got it. Guess the only way to win is huff air, do drugs and say you hear voices. 20 doctors and a NO. It's because of my age and sex.Only and his ****** STATS HE HAS TO KEEP ON CHECK FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. See them on the site. It's pathetic and he does Hawaii as well as Santa Barbara. That should make him not a judge right there. He's just as bad as Mary and Roger but acts nice. I posted the 3 star on him but I guess I was wroung. All just a show. He puts no effort in any thing. Sad and it ruins people's life's and maybe he gets off on that playing GOD with people's lives
I thought Judge Andeer was great. He yelled at my attorney for making me get all the medical records and do all the leg work. I pray that he awards me my disability. Thank you for sticking up for me Judge. It really took it's told on me trying to get it all. I am extremely depressed over this entire situation. Its like begging for scraps to try to live like a human again.
I thought Judge Andeer was great. He yelled at my attorney for making me get all the medical records and do all the leg work. I pray that he awards me my disability. Thank you for sticking up for me Judge. It really took it's told on me trying to get it all. I am extremely depressed over this entire situation. Its like begging for scraps to try to live like a human again.
I thought Judge Andeer was great. He yelled at my attorney for making me get all the medical records and do all the leg work. I pray that he awards me my disability. Thank you for sticking up for me Judge. It really took it's told on me trying to get it all. I am extremely depressed over this entire situation. Its like begging for scraps to try to live like a human again.
This judge is a tool. Rude. Condescending. Horrible. Didn’t help my advocate was his twin lost at birth. I have 2 brain tumors, severe anxiety & depression, and this “judge” denied my claim because I was “calm and collected” in his courtroom. No lies! I was diagnosed in 2012 and this is a chronic disease I’ll die from. I’m now filing bankruptcy and have nerve damage now in my feet. THIS TOOL SAID I COULD BE A GROCERY STORE BAGGER.
This judge is a tool. Rude. Condescending. Horrible. Didn’t help my advocate was his twin lost at birth. I have 2 brain tumors, severe anxiety & depression, and this “judge” denied my claim because I was “calm and collected” in his courtroom. No lies! I was diagnosed in 2012 and this is a chronic disease I’ll die from. I’m now filing bankruptcy and have nerve damage now in my feet. THIS TOOL SAID I COULD BE A GROCERY STORE BAGGER.
This judge is a tool. Rude. Condescending. Horrible. Didn’t help my advocate was his twin lost at birth. I have 2 brain tumors, severe anxiety & depression, and this “judge” denied my claim because I was “calm and collected” in his courtroom. No lies! I was diagnosed in 2012 and this is a chronic disease I’ll die from. I’m now filing bankruptcy and have nerve damage now in my feet. THIS TOOL SAID I COULD BE A GROCERY STORE BAGGER.
This is a terrible judge. He will not believe your testimony of disability, even when you have extensive medical records and proof that even working part-time is too much to handle. I would not give him even one star. He has no understanding of the struggles of a person with chronic medical conditions that taxes your energy and makes you tired even after modest activity. I feel sorry for those that have to appear in front of this person.
This is a terrible judge. He will not believe your testimony of disability, even when you have extensive medical records and proof that even working part-time is too much to handle. I would not give him even one star. He has no understanding of the struggles of a person with chronic medical conditions that taxes your energy and makes you tired even after modest activity. I feel sorry for those that have to appear in front of this person.
This is a terrible judge. He will not believe your testimony of disability, even when you have extensive medical records and proof that even working part-time is too much to handle. I would not give him even one star. He has no understanding of the struggles of a person with chronic medical conditions that taxes your energy and makes you tired even after modest activity. I feel sorry for those that have to appear in front of this person.
I have appeared before about 150 ALJs in 30 years of practice. He is among the bottom 10 percent.
I have appeared before about 150 ALJs in 30 years of practice. He is among the bottom 10 percent.
I have appeared before about 150 ALJs in 30 years of practice. He is among the bottom 10 percent.
I went before judge Ball and in the past eight years has been a rollercoaster ride with social security. I just couldn't understand why they are fighting me I had breast cancer along with bad doctors and surgeon's and hard to get a job with medical. Judge Ball is the only Judge that was fair and listened to my story and then I listened to him and his questions and I found he spent time to explain my case to me and no other judge ever did this. I have a hard time understanding legal and reading with seventh grade education and I found judge Ball to be fair and honest with me. As one human to another that's all we can ask for in life just be fair. Even if I am right or wrong. Thank you for your time to read.
I went before judge Ball and in the past eight years has been a rollercoaster ride with social security. I just couldn't understand why they are fighting me I had breast cancer along with bad doctors and surgeon's and hard to get a job with medical. Judge Ball is the only Judge that was fair and listened to my story and then I listened to him and his questions and I found he spent time to explain my case to me and no other judge ever did this. I have a hard time understanding legal and reading with seventh grade education and I found judge Ball to be fair and honest with me. As one human to another that's all we can ask for in life just be fair. Even if I am right or wrong. Thank you for your time to read.
I went before judge Ball and in the past eight years has been a rollercoaster ride with social security. I just couldn't understand why they are fighting me I had breast cancer along with bad doctors and surgeon's and hard to get a job with medical. Judge Ball is the only Judge that was fair and listened to my story and then I listened to him and his questions and I found he spent time to explain my case to me and no other judge ever did this. I have a hard time understanding legal and reading with seventh grade education and I found judge Ball to be fair and honest with me. As one human to another that's all we can ask for in life just be fair. Even if I am right or wrong. Thank you for your time to read.
As an attorney representative, I endorse Judge Ken Ball as a fair, respectful and knowledgeable ALJ. During the course of the hearing he treats the claimant with respect and dignity and is very patient to hear all pertinent evidence in adjudicating the claim.
As an attorney representative, I endorse Judge Ken Ball as a fair, respectful and knowledgeable ALJ. During the course of the hearing he treats the claimant with respect and dignity and is very patient to hear all pertinent evidence in adjudicating the claim.
As an attorney representative, I endorse Judge Ken Ball as a fair, respectful and knowledgeable ALJ. During the course of the hearing he treats the claimant with respect and dignity and is very patient to hear all pertinent evidence in adjudicating the claim.
Judge Ball is helpful caring and a nice judge. He helped me get the Ssdi I needed. Hes a good judge.
Judge Ball is helpful caring and a nice judge. He helped me get the Ssdi I needed. Hes a good judge.
Judge Ball is helpful caring and a nice judge. He helped me get the Ssdi I needed. Hes a good judge.
As an attorney rep, I have appeared before this ALJ. In my experience, she was very empathetic and treated both the claimant and attorney very respectfully, professionally and fairly.
As an attorney rep, I have appeared before this ALJ. In my experience, she was very empathetic and treated both the claimant and attorney very respectfully, professionally and fairly.
As an attorney rep, I have appeared before this ALJ. In my experience, she was very empathetic and treated both the claimant and attorney very respectfully, professionally and fairly.
I haven't received my decision yet, with that said I would like to think that court went well and she seemed really sympathetic and kind towards myself...She was very nice and easy to talk to although Iam great full towards my attorney because there was parts I would daze off and he was there to answer her questions as well , my case took an hour and a half to those of you want to know she is thorough …… good luck to all of you going on disability is hard and stress full I've waited total 6 and 1/2 years battling depression and social security anyways this is about the judge fair and kind and very thorough....enough said sincerely yours
I haven't received my decision yet, with that said I would like to think that court went well and she seemed really sympathetic and kind towards myself...She was very nice and easy to talk to although Iam great full towards my attorney because there was parts I would daze off and he was there to answer her questions as well , my case took an hour and a half to those of you want to know she is thorough …… good luck to all of you going on disability is hard and stress full I've waited total 6 and 1/2 years battling depression and social security anyways this is about the judge fair and kind and very thorough....enough said sincerely yours
I haven't received my decision yet, with that said I would like to think that court went well and she seemed really sympathetic and kind towards myself...She was very nice and easy to talk to although Iam great full towards my attorney because there was parts I would daze off and he was there to answer her questions as well , my case took an hour and a half to those of you want to know she is thorough …… good luck to all of you going on disability is hard and stress full I've waited total 6 and 1/2 years battling depression and social security anyways this is about the judge fair and kind and very thorough....enough said sincerely yours
As an attorney rep, I can comment that Judge Cohn-Morros is a very respectful, patient and fair judge. During the hearing, she treats both counsel and claimant with dignity, respect and empathy.
As an attorney rep, I can comment that Judge Cohn-Morros is a very respectful, patient and fair judge. During the hearing, she treats both counsel and claimant with dignity, respect and empathy.
As an attorney rep, I can comment that Judge Cohn-Morros is a very respectful, patient and fair judge. During the hearing, she treats both counsel and claimant with dignity, respect and empathy.
Takes 7 months to make decision! Requests supplemental hearing then cancels and finally makes a quick decision and not a fair one I might add. You think after taking that long for a decision he would of at least read medical records or listened to the medical expert that was there that stated I was disabled.
Takes 7 months to make decision! Requests supplemental hearing then cancels and finally makes a quick decision and not a fair one I might add. You think after taking that long for a decision he would of at least read medical records or listened to the medical expert that was there that stated I was disabled.
Takes 7 months to make decision! Requests supplemental hearing then cancels and finally makes a quick decision and not a fair one I might add. You think after taking that long for a decision he would of at least read medical records or listened to the medical expert that was there that stated I was disabled.
What a joke!!! I had letters from all my doctors saying that my conditions are and continue to be disabling and this knucklehead desides I'm not disabled. I'm going to file a complaint see SSA form EN-05-10041. We've got to do more than complain we need to get him off th bench.
What a joke!!! I had letters from all my doctors saying that my conditions are and continue to be disabling and this knucklehead desides I'm not disabled. I'm going to file a complaint see SSA form EN-05-10041. We've got to do more than complain we need to get him off th bench.
What a joke!!! I had letters from all my doctors saying that my conditions are and continue to be disabling and this knucklehead desides I'm not disabled. I'm going to file a complaint see SSA form EN-05-10041. We've got to do more than complain we need to get him off th bench.
After waiting 3 years after 1st filing I finally went to my hearing. I just want to say Judge Dietterle was understanding, listened to what I said, asked simple but to the point question. I have read other comments and think most of these people are not disabled, just trying to game the system. I heard and saw things in the waiting area that is not right. You guys are the reason the system is so backed up. Oh by the way, it may take another 2 months to find out but I know I won. I judge knows the honest person records or not.
After waiting 3 years after 1st filing I finally went to my hearing. I just want to say Judge Dietterle was understanding, listened to what I said, asked simple but to the point question. I have read other comments and think most of these people are not disabled, just trying to game the system. I heard and saw things in the waiting area that is not right. You guys are the reason the system is so backed up. Oh by the way, it may take another 2 months to find out but I know I won. I judge knows the honest person records or not.
After waiting 3 years after 1st filing I finally went to my hearing. I just want to say Judge Dietterle was understanding, listened to what I said, asked simple but to the point question. I have read other comments and think most of these people are not disabled, just trying to game the system. I heard and saw things in the waiting area that is not right. You guys are the reason the system is so backed up. Oh by the way, it may take another 2 months to find out but I know I won. I judge knows the honest person records or not.
A fair, thoughtful, considerate, and insightful ALJ. This is from a representative who has been before him many times.
A fair, thoughtful, considerate, and insightful ALJ. This is from a representative who has been before him many times.
A fair, thoughtful, considerate, and insightful ALJ. This is from a representative who has been before him many times.
Have the medical proof and you win simple.God bless those that are truly disabled. This is a very fair Judge.
Have the medical proof and you win simple.God bless those that are truly disabled. This is a very fair Judge.
Have the medical proof and you win simple.God bless those that are truly disabled. This is a very fair Judge.
This Judge has destroyed my life and familys life by calling me a liar,i have always been a law obeying person no criminal past always paid taxes and gave full honesty about why i could not work i have now lost my wife died oct 5,lost my health and about to be on the street.all my records show the facts my condition continues to worsen my only choice now is to go and be with my wife please dont let this happen to others.
This Judge has destroyed my life and familys life by calling me a liar,i have always been a law obeying person no criminal past always paid taxes and gave full honesty about why i could not work i have now lost my wife died oct 5,lost my health and about to be on the street.all my records show the facts my condition continues to worsen my only choice now is to go and be with my wife please dont let this happen to others.
This Judge has destroyed my life and familys life by calling me a liar,i have always been a law obeying person no criminal past always paid taxes and gave full honesty about why i could not work i have now lost my wife died oct 5,lost my health and about to be on the street.all my records show the facts my condition continues to worsen my only choice now is to go and be with my wife please dont let this happen to others.
This judge does not seem to care at all about the human factor, just cold hard facts.He didn't take the time during my hearing and hardly asked questions, my own attorney didn't know how to read that. I did. I could tell he didn't like me and that he wasn't going to approve my claim. If you do get this judge, make sure you present the facts from your medical records, make sure you get your doctors to write reports about your condition, don't let him send you to his doctors. And most of all, get yourself a competent attorney that could present your case in the best possible way and challenge him and other soc sec staff on the law. You will have a much better chance of winning your claim I think.
This judge does not seem to care at all about the human factor, just cold hard facts.He didn't take the time during my hearing and hardly asked questions, my own attorney didn't know how to read that. I did. I could tell he didn't like me and that he wasn't going to approve my claim. If you do get this judge, make sure you present the facts from your medical records, make sure you get your doctors to write reports about your condition, don't let him send you to his doctors. And most of all, get yourself a competent attorney that could present your case in the best possible way and challenge him and other soc sec staff on the law. You will have a much better chance of winning your claim I think.
This judge does not seem to care at all about the human factor, just cold hard facts.He didn't take the time during my hearing and hardly asked questions, my own attorney didn't know how to read that. I did. I could tell he didn't like me and that he wasn't going to approve my claim. If you do get this judge, make sure you present the facts from your medical records, make sure you get your doctors to write reports about your condition, don't let him send you to his doctors. And most of all, get yourself a competent attorney that could present your case in the best possible way and challenge him and other soc sec staff on the law. You will have a much better chance of winning your claim I think.
Do not try to present the human factor to this judge, it is a waste of time. Pray that you don't get this judge, but If you do, be very well prepared, get medical reports that are spelled out for him, do not let him send you to his doctors, and use the law to challenge him each and every time.
Do not try to present the human factor to this judge, it is a waste of time. Pray that you don't get this judge, but If you do, be very well prepared, get medical reports that are spelled out for him, do not let him send you to his doctors, and use the law to challenge him each and every time.
Do not try to present the human factor to this judge, it is a waste of time. Pray that you don't get this judge, but If you do, be very well prepared, get medical reports that are spelled out for him, do not let him send you to his doctors, and use the law to challenge him each and every time.
I was very nervous before my hearing ,I know that I am disabled , I was just nervous by the reviews I seen about the Judge... Not sure who you are but the Judge treating me with respect And was very considerate to my health issues.... Even when I said I was Transgender , he did not blink an eye which shows me he is genuine & professional .... Hope to hear an answer soon.... Whatever the outcome is , all I know is the Judge was caring , understating ,and acted like my advocate when asking the VE questions ... Not sure what they were taking about but she said I can't work ..so we shall see...
I was very nervous before my hearing ,I know that I am disabled , I was just nervous by the reviews I seen about the Judge... Not sure who you are but the Judge treating me with respect And was very considerate to my health issues.... Even when I said I was Transgender , he did not blink an eye which shows me he is genuine & professional .... Hope to hear an answer soon.... Whatever the outcome is , all I know is the Judge was caring , understating ,and acted like my advocate when asking the VE questions ... Not sure what they were taking about but she said I can't work ..so we shall see...
I was very nervous before my hearing ,I know that I am disabled , I was just nervous by the reviews I seen about the Judge... Not sure who you are but the Judge treating me with respect And was very considerate to my health issues.... Even when I said I was Transgender , he did not blink an eye which shows me he is genuine & professional .... Hope to hear an answer soon.... Whatever the outcome is , all I know is the Judge was caring , understating ,and acted like my advocate when asking the VE questions ... Not sure what they were taking about but she said I can't work ..so we shall see...
By far the best ALJ. Very knowledgeable. If you're a rep speak up or the hearing will be over before you know it!
By far the best ALJ. Very knowledgeable. If you're a rep speak up or the hearing will be over before you know it!
By far the best ALJ. Very knowledgeable. If you're a rep speak up or the hearing will be over before you know it!
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge made a terrible mistake in judging me incorrectly. She had numerous errors throughout the lengthy denial letter I received, regarding her supposed review of my medical records. She claimed I didn't have proof of several diagnosis' in my records when there was clear cut proof in these records. My third party who was supposed to testify at my hearing was not allowed to do so, and She made allegations in her letter about me that are downright descriminatory and false. She didn't ask me about several things during the hearing but then made statements in her letter accusing me of things she never gave me a chance to confirm or deny. She claims I am still able to work despite the fact I have become so ill that I can't keep up with my own personal hygiene let alone work. I haven't even been able to keep most of my appointments with several of my specialists because I have been too sick to drive myself to them. I have several diagnosis' on the adult list of disabling conditions, and I hope she sees this and knows that she was cruel and wrong about me, and my life has been completely destroyed because of her. I will most likely have to live on the street soon because she denied me benefits I have desperately needed. God help you if you have to have this judge in charge of your hearing. She is irresponsible and descriminatory and shouldn't be allowed to judge with her own personal opinions on a person. She is mean and will destroy your character if she doesn't like the look of you. That is what happened to me. She will destroy your life if she doesn't like you. This judge ruined my life that was already in the toilet from years of suffering from a rare illness.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
This judge does not no her job don't know how she even became a judge I think she needs to go back to school and study the law better she made so many mistakes in my case she lied in her report she did not have a good reason wrost judge I have ever experienced she was really judgemental on site she just keeped bring up the bad stuff I did in the past not nothing about my disability that I am going throw right now she's stuck in the past not the present she really needs to study each cases better.
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
Best judge ever, she gave me disability right away! I do not know why you people are haters! But, haters gonna hate!
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I understand that this could be taken as "this person got turned down and is upset". I am indeed upset, but it is because I was turned down for completely false reasons. So beware of this Judge. She will use anything she can against you. I thought my rep and I had everything in order. My T's crossed and I's dotted. I was wrong! This judge acted as if my PCP's RFC paperwork didn't exist because one minor thing was not in my medical history. My PCP supports the fact that I am disabled. I also have two other doctors that stated I had MDI's that met the SSA guidelines for disability. She uses things in your medical report that are autofill parts from specialists. Like my wrist Ortho's ROS form that I now know he doesn't fill out except for the reason HE is seeing you. That being my wrist. So he didn't fill out that I have fibromyalgia, severe headaches, back pain, weakness, etc. And that was used against me in the decision letter. Even though it was never asked about at the hearing. This judge seems to discriminate based on your age and medical condition(Still a lot of judges that refuse to see the conditions I have as real). Even though my MDI's are listed in the SSA guidelines she chose to not consider them. There are so many errors in her decision letter that my rep said it will take a while to list them all. So I guess that's a good thing. Problem is that I have been trying to get the disability I deserve for 4 1/2 years now. My family and I are financially ruined. The appeals council will take 14-18 more months per my rep and then if Federal suit is needed, another year or more. My family will be on the streets by then. The SSA system drains everything you have worked hard for in your life and drags the process out over way too many years. Just to be turned down by someone who doesn't follow guidelines and makes wild assumptions with no facts.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
I am the single case approved by the Albuquerque Odar ALJ. Mariam C Fernandez Rice in the year of our Lord 2017. The processing office is forcing me to appeal the decision without my consent. In processing the protected application date of the approved title 16 before the approved title 2 is being denied by the processing office. And forcing me to blame the ALJ as being in error. When P.O.M.S. D.I.27515.020 new title 2 D.I.B. claim- title16 disability previously established. Clearly refers the processing office as the responsible entity in favoring the claimant in detail. Please review.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
This judge made a horrible mistake in judging my case she just keeped going on about my tattoos and I was just thinking to myself we are not here to talk about tattoos I thought were here to talk about a disability and the reasons why I can’t work but she was really just hung up about the tattoo situation again I was thinking to my self yes lady I know I got tattoos get over it already she was also judgmental on my Personal appearance my age ect so all in all I took her Decision to federal court and was in my favor for an appeal 18 months later here I go again back to court again all over her Mistake she made and For wasting my time at the end of the day she didn’t do her job right if you get this judge for your case be careful on your appearance and also be very careful on what you say she is very Judgmental and well deny your case for any little reason she feels like in my Experience is the worst judge to have.
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
I’d like no I demand to know why she’s still a judge? Case after case she lies then fits wording in a report but by piecing different sentences together to fit her narrative. How can this be legal? Talk about being slandered over & over. At the same time she’s so ******. Every thing she said that proved I’m a liar that I’m not disabled is there in my records. I want her fired & id like her to pay for the pain & suffering she’s caused me & so many others. Her lies hurt so bad. I’ve waited so long & I get a judge who never gave me a chance. She’d made her decision about us all before we saw her. Her hate & disgust for us is clearly evident. Her aim was to destroy our reputations because she thinks she can. She’s a despicable excuse for a human being but someday she’ll mess with the wrong person & she’ll pay. It’s gonna happen. How is she still a judge? Others must have appealed. The counsil & other judges must have read what she writes. Unless your all like her but there must be a few decent judges. Help us!
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
The Judge is an idiot, in my opinion. She stated, in the decision for my daughter, who can barely get around, that she felt her suited for a hotel housekeeper. Obviously, the woman has lost sense of reality. Why the government employs such a sad excuse for humanity is unknown.
viagra pill canadian pharmacy viagra viagra from india
viagra pill canadian pharmacy viagra viagra from india
Judge Harrell is very intimidating. In addition, he broke Social Security laws when I had to see him more than once, and he referred to my previous hearing when I had no legal representation. By SSA law, he was not allowed to review my previous hearing because I did not have legal representation. SSA law also states that once a judge had denied your case, you will not see that judge again. Further, he intimidated the Occupational Expert when she said there was no job I could do. He basically forced her to change her decision. To cover his errors, he claimed that he audio portion was distorted, and I had to return again. All in all, I had to see him three times and he broke at least 3 laws. He is the head of the judges in the San Bernardino area. AWFUL JUDGE!
Judge Harrell is very intimidating. In addition, he broke Social Security laws when I had to see him more than once, and he referred to my previous hearing when I had no legal representation. By SSA law, he was not allowed to review my previous hearing because I did not have legal representation. SSA law also states that once a judge had denied your case, you will not see that judge again. Further, he intimidated the Occupational Expert when she said there was no job I could do. He basically forced her to change her decision. To cover his errors, he claimed that he audio portion was distorted, and I had to return again. All in all, I had to see him three times and he broke at least 3 laws. He is the head of the judges in the San Bernardino area. AWFUL JUDGE!
Judge Harrell is very intimidating. In addition, he broke Social Security laws when I had to see him more than once, and he referred to my previous hearing when I had no legal representation. By SSA law, he was not allowed to review my previous hearing because I did not have legal representation. SSA law also states that once a judge had denied your case, you will not see that judge again. Further, he intimidated the Occupational Expert when she said there was no job I could do. He basically forced her to change her decision. To cover his errors, he claimed that he audio portion was distorted, and I had to return again. All in all, I had to see him three times and he broke at least 3 laws. He is the head of the judges in the San Bernardino area. AWFUL JUDGE!
He is a coward. He is abusive and takes advantage of his position. He is a liar and a thief.
He is a coward. He is abusive and takes advantage of his position. He is a liar and a thief.
He is a coward. He is abusive and takes advantage of his position. He is a liar and a thief.
This judge gave great weight to the testimony of the experts who did not have a face-to-face interview with me and little weight to the doctors who had a personal face-to-face interview with me. Judge Harrell's final determination was filled with subjective inconsistency and relied on his on medical reasoning. Judge Harrell played doctor with my case. Of course, I appealed to the board in Virginia who discovered that the audio tapes of the medical doctor and vocational experts were missing and remanded my case for a new hearing in front of a different judge. Judge Harrell definitely needs a refresher course in ethical behavior.
This judge gave great weight to the testimony of the experts who did not have a face-to-face interview with me and little weight to the doctors who had a personal face-to-face interview with me. Judge Harrell's final determination was filled with subjective inconsistency and relied on his on medical reasoning. Judge Harrell played doctor with my case. Of course, I appealed to the board in Virginia who discovered that the audio tapes of the medical doctor and vocational experts were missing and remanded my case for a new hearing in front of a different judge. Judge Harrell definitely needs a refresher course in ethical behavior.
This judge gave great weight to the testimony of the experts who did not have a face-to-face interview with me and little weight to the doctors who had a personal face-to-face interview with me. Judge Harrell's final determination was filled with subjective inconsistency and relied on his on medical reasoning. Judge Harrell played doctor with my case. Of course, I appealed to the board in Virginia who discovered that the audio tapes of the medical doctor and vocational experts were missing and remanded my case for a new hearing in front of a different judge. Judge Harrell definitely needs a refresher course in ethical behavior.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
Judge Harrell was a little on the soft spoken side, not intimidating. He did show a good critical mind and challenged me on some things but there was no ego in it. He was just a gentleman doing his job. If your responses are legit he accepts them. Just make an effort to understand his role and responsibilities beforehand and provide him with the proper tools he needs to make a determination in your favor.
Judge Harrell was a little on the soft spoken side, not intimidating. He did show a good critical mind and challenged me on some things but there was no ego in it. He was just a gentleman doing his job. If your responses are legit he accepts them. Just make an effort to understand his role and responsibilities beforehand and provide him with the proper tools he needs to make a determination in your favor.
Judge Harrell was a little on the soft spoken side, not intimidating. He did show a good critical mind and challenged me on some things but there was no ego in it. He was just a gentleman doing his job. If your responses are legit he accepts them. Just make an effort to understand his role and responsibilities beforehand and provide him with the proper tools he needs to make a determination in your favor.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
I am an attorney. I see lots of comments on here about the law that are completely wrong. If you want to see what kind of Judge you have, look at the percentages of awards provided on this site. Do not look at the comments for an understanding of the law. It seems many of the commenters are very misinformed about the hearing process. All and all, I highly recommend using an attorney at your hearing so someone who understands disability law can help you understand the procedure.
Judge Mason D Harrell Jr. handled my case and asked all the questions. It took seven weeks to get a judgement that was fully favorable. I did have an attorney who also followed up with questions. The judge listen to my case and came to a judgement. I am so happy this whole process is over.
Judge Mason D Harrell Jr. handled my case and asked all the questions. It took seven weeks to get a judgement that was fully favorable. I did have an attorney who also followed up with questions. The judge listen to my case and came to a judgement. I am so happy this whole process is over.
Judge Mason D Harrell Jr. handled my case and asked all the questions. It took seven weeks to get a judgement that was fully favorable. I did have an attorney who also followed up with questions. The judge listen to my case and came to a judgement. I am so happy this whole process is over.
Judge Harrell was fair. When he asked questions I didn't feel like he was trying to trick me like the previous ALJ. He was aware of my medical issues where the previous ALJ was uninterested.
Judge Harrell was fair. When he asked questions I didn't feel like he was trying to trick me like the previous ALJ. He was aware of my medical issues where the previous ALJ was uninterested.
Judge Harrell was fair. When he asked questions I didn't feel like he was trying to trick me like the previous ALJ. He was aware of my medical issues where the previous ALJ was uninterested.
Judge Mason Harrell Jr. Is a fair judge waiting on his decision.
Judge Mason Harrell Jr. Is a fair judge waiting on his decision.
Judge Mason Harrell Jr. Is a fair judge waiting on his decision.
I felt judge Harrell did his duties as a judge quite fair. However, he did not ask opinions from my medical expert or vocational expert which has me a little worried. Other than that I felt for my first time at a hearing I felt relaxed and calm.
I felt judge Harrell did his duties as a judge quite fair. However, he did not ask opinions from my medical expert or vocational expert which has me a little worried. Other than that I felt for my first time at a hearing I felt relaxed and calm.
I felt judge Harrell did his duties as a judge quite fair. However, he did not ask opinions from my medical expert or vocational expert which has me a little worried. Other than that I felt for my first time at a hearing I felt relaxed and calm.
The last comment is completely understandable. I had judge Harrell and the whole process took about 15 minutes. The judge did not ask the vocational expert any questions and he may have asked to verify the medical expert special codes my Ssdi Lawyer had brought up. After all the questions were asked he asked me a few questions about my daily life, then asked my attorney if he had any questions and the attorney said no and that was it. With all that said I got a fully favorable consideration. I think if your attorney comes in really prepared and gives a pre-briefing that is perfect for the judge everything will go fine. I just got a fully favorable consideration today ( July 10 19). So for the last comment I really would not have anything to worry about. My Attorney said that case couldn't have gone any better. And just to bring up one thing he did say that the reason why the judge did not ask questions to the vocational rehabilitation expert is why he predicted that my case was basically going to win ( and he was right ). So if you have any worries please know, that judge does not really speak too much and if he does I think that’s where you have the problems, Because he is looking for reasons to deny you. So if I were a betting man, you have nothing to worry about other than maybe getting a fully favorable consideration, thanks
The last comment is completely understandable. I had judge Harrell and the whole process took about 15 minutes. The judge did not ask the vocational expert any questions and he may have asked to verify the medical expert special codes my Ssdi Lawyer had brought up. After all the questions were asked he asked me a few questions about my daily life, then asked my attorney if he had any questions and the attorney said no and that was it. With all that said I got a fully favorable consideration. I think if your attorney comes in really prepared and gives a pre-briefing that is perfect for the judge everything will go fine. I just got a fully favorable consideration today ( July 10 19). So for the last comment I really would not have anything to worry about. My Attorney said that case couldn't have gone any better. And just to bring up one thing he did say that the reason why the judge did not ask questions to the vocational rehabilitation expert is why he predicted that my case was basically going to win ( and he was right ). So if you have any worries please know, that judge does not really speak too much and if he does I think that’s where you have the problems, Because he is looking for reasons to deny you. So if I were a betting man, you have nothing to worry about other than maybe getting a fully favorable consideration, thanks
The last comment is completely understandable. I had judge Harrell and the whole process took about 15 minutes. The judge did not ask the vocational expert any questions and he may have asked to verify the medical expert special codes my Ssdi Lawyer had brought up. After all the questions were asked he asked me a few questions about my daily life, then asked my attorney if he had any questions and the attorney said no and that was it. With all that said I got a fully favorable consideration. I think if your attorney comes in really prepared and gives a pre-briefing that is perfect for the judge everything will go fine. I just got a fully favorable consideration today ( July 10 19). So for the last comment I really would not have anything to worry about. My Attorney said that case couldn't have gone any better. And just to bring up one thing he did say that the reason why the judge did not ask questions to the vocational rehabilitation expert is why he predicted that my case was basically going to win ( and he was right ). So if you have any worries please know, that judge does not really speak too much and if he does I think that’s where you have the problems, Because he is looking for reasons to deny you. So if I were a betting man, you have nothing to worry about other than maybe getting a fully favorable consideration, thanks
Helen, you were one heck of a good Atty. Thank you for your awesome work.. :-)
Helen, you were one heck of a good Atty. Thank you for your awesome work.. :-)
Helen, you were one heck of a good Atty. Thank you for your awesome work.. :-)
I am a person with 4 back surgeries and 4 stomach surgeries. My back surgeries have taken place over the past 38 years,all the surgeries were of a serious nature and they have left me in a tremedous amount of pain over the past 10yrs. I have Wedge compressions of the T11,T12,L1,L2 and L5 with large Schmorl's nodes and superior endplate depression.My T12 and L1 are also fractured.I also have Disc's bulging at L2,L3 plus Fractures of T11,T12,L2 and L5. L2,L3,L4 and L5. This is only part of what is wrong with my back. Now regarding stomach surgery I have had 4 surgeries one they took my Duodeum and half my stomach and used mesh to put me back together. I then ended up having 2 surgeries for Hernias of the in cession where they again used mesh. It turns out my body does not produce Cologen that is a healing product so they finally ended up tying my stomach up to my Ribs. My life has been in shambles ever since my last 4 operations, my stomach goes into muscle spasms and my left leg is extremely numb, I now walk bent over and to sleep is misery as my stomach roles back and forth plus the pain from my back. To make this even worse I have become Anemic and have had to go to the hospital for a Transfusion (5)pints. I started a SSDI at the age of 59 and thanks to Judge Hesse I have been denied as she and the expert Dr. out of Palm Springs decided that I would have NO PROBLEM working an 8 hour a day job. By the way the Dr. hasn't ever seen me but Judge Hesse talked to him over the phone??? I am now 63 and have been denied SSDI 2 times I have worked all my life in a Managerial position and was constantly traveling. By now anyone reading this probably wonders why I was Denied SSDI?? I am very disappointed in the Judge as she did not take any of my reports seriously. My Doctors are beyond themselves and can't figure out what is wrong with this Judge. I am limited to lifting 5lbs at the most and I am in constant pain. I hope the Judge is very happy!!!
I am a person with 4 back surgeries and 4 stomach surgeries. My back surgeries have taken place over the past 38 years,all the surgeries were of a serious nature and they have left me in a tremedous amount of pain over the past 10yrs. I have Wedge compressions of the T11,T12,L1,L2 and L5 with large Schmorl's nodes and superior endplate depression.My T12 and L1 are also fractured.I also have Disc's bulging at L2,L3 plus Fractures of T11,T12,L2 and L5. L2,L3,L4 and L5. This is only part of what is wrong with my back. Now regarding stomach surgery I have had 4 surgeries one they took my Duodeum and half my stomach and used mesh to put me back together. I then ended up having 2 surgeries for Hernias of the in cession where they again used mesh. It turns out my body does not produce Cologen that is a healing product so they finally ended up tying my stomach up to my Ribs. My life has been in shambles ever since my last 4 operations, my stomach goes into muscle spasms and my left leg is extremely numb, I now walk bent over and to sleep is misery as my stomach roles back and forth plus the pain from my back. To make this even worse I have become Anemic and have had to go to the hospital for a Transfusion (5)pints. I started a SSDI at the age of 59 and thanks to Judge Hesse I have been denied as she and the expert Dr. out of Palm Springs decided that I would have NO PROBLEM working an 8 hour a day job. By the way the Dr. hasn't ever seen me but Judge Hesse talked to him over the phone??? I am now 63 and have been denied SSDI 2 times I have worked all my life in a Managerial position and was constantly traveling. By now anyone reading this probably wonders why I was Denied SSDI?? I am very disappointed in the Judge as she did not take any of my reports seriously. My Doctors are beyond themselves and can't figure out what is wrong with this Judge. I am limited to lifting 5lbs at the most and I am in constant pain. I hope the Judge is very happy!!!
I am a person with 4 back surgeries and 4 stomach surgeries. My back surgeries have taken place over the past 38 years,all the surgeries were of a serious nature and they have left me in a tremedous amount of pain over the past 10yrs. I have Wedge compressions of the T11,T12,L1,L2 and L5 with large Schmorl's nodes and superior endplate depression.My T12 and L1 are also fractured.I also have Disc's bulging at L2,L3 plus Fractures of T11,T12,L2 and L5. L2,L3,L4 and L5. This is only part of what is wrong with my back. Now regarding stomach surgery I have had 4 surgeries one they took my Duodeum and half my stomach and used mesh to put me back together. I then ended up having 2 surgeries for Hernias of the in cession where they again used mesh. It turns out my body does not produce Cologen that is a healing product so they finally ended up tying my stomach up to my Ribs. My life has been in shambles ever since my last 4 operations, my stomach goes into muscle spasms and my left leg is extremely numb, I now walk bent over and to sleep is misery as my stomach roles back and forth plus the pain from my back. To make this even worse I have become Anemic and have had to go to the hospital for a Transfusion (5)pints. I started a SSDI at the age of 59 and thanks to Judge Hesse I have been denied as she and the expert Dr. out of Palm Springs decided that I would have NO PROBLEM working an 8 hour a day job. By the way the Dr. hasn't ever seen me but Judge Hesse talked to him over the phone??? I am now 63 and have been denied SSDI 2 times I have worked all my life in a Managerial position and was constantly traveling. By now anyone reading this probably wonders why I was Denied SSDI?? I am very disappointed in the Judge as she did not take any of my reports seriously. My Doctors are beyond themselves and can't figure out what is wrong with this Judge. I am limited to lifting 5lbs at the most and I am in constant pain. I hope the Judge is very happy!!!
I believe that if we you had a understanding Judge that there would not be so many denials and upsets. We get Attorneys to help understand the concepts of the meaning of the law and what to expect.
I believe that if we you had a understanding Judge that there would not be so many denials and upsets. We get Attorneys to help understand the concepts of the meaning of the law and what to expect.
I believe that if we you had a understanding Judge that there would not be so many denials and upsets. We get Attorneys to help understand the concepts of the meaning of the law and what to expect.
This judge has become cold to people and their injuries Less and Less people are approved and more are denied. No compassion for the individual
This judge has become cold to people and their injuries Less and Less people are approved and more are denied. No compassion for the individual
This judge has become cold to people and their injuries Less and Less people are approved and more are denied. No compassion for the individual
Helen Hesse abused her power and committed so many violations. Those in higher power need to investigate her. There is a pattern of abuse and violations. She's playing with people's lives.
Helen Hesse abused her power and committed so many violations. Those in higher power need to investigate her. There is a pattern of abuse and violations. She's playing with people's lives.
Helen Hesse abused her power and committed so many violations. Those in higher power need to investigate her. There is a pattern of abuse and violations. She's playing with people's lives.
She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid.
She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid.
She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid.
I agree SHE does She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid. Makes you wonder who she is approving someone should look into that.
I agree SHE does She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid. Makes you wonder who she is approving someone should look into that.
I agree SHE does She conducts her hearings in a very unfair manner. She will spend an hour grilling the client and then tell his attorney, who has just started his/her examination, that there is a shortage of time. Her mind is made up prior to the first word of testimony, and this is reflected in her attitude and questioning. Judges decisions are slanted with the negative highlighted and the positive ignored. This is a an ALJ to avoid. Makes you wonder who she is approving someone should look into that.
She is a friendly judge at the hearings. You want to make sure you prepare your client to explain their limitations well. Because answers like "a while" or "not to long" is not going to work. She does tend to use ME especiall in psych cases.
She is a friendly judge at the hearings. You want to make sure you prepare your client to explain their limitations well. Because answers like "a while" or "not to long" is not going to work. She does tend to use ME especiall in psych cases.
She is a friendly judge at the hearings. You want to make sure you prepare your client to explain their limitations well. Because answers like "a while" or "not to long" is not going to work. She does tend to use ME especiall in psych cases.
She was so unprofessional in the hearing and rude. I was so shocked. I am suprised she allowed to be on the bench.
She was so unprofessional in the hearing and rude. I was so shocked. I am suprised she allowed to be on the bench.
She was so unprofessional in the hearing and rude. I was so shocked. I am suprised she allowed to be on the bench.
She and her team of consultants not only ignore the medical evidence of disability, they outright state that there is none, making her decision so obviously biased.
She and her team of consultants not only ignore the medical evidence of disability, they outright state that there is none, making her decision so obviously biased.
She and her team of consultants not only ignore the medical evidence of disability, they outright state that there is none, making her decision so obviously biased.
She is so unprofessional. She discredits every doctor you have even if they are the treating physician. She outright states that there is a disability, but doesn't believe the doctors, even when there is FDA evidence of the challenges one faces. Distorts information and twists the hearing so it is not in favor of the person to receive the disability payments. She will even discredit their own doctors and not accept their evidence. She places so called experts on the stand that know nothing about the disabling conditions, than uses their testimonies.
She is so unprofessional. She discredits every doctor you have even if they are the treating physician. She outright states that there is a disability, but doesn't believe the doctors, even when there is FDA evidence of the challenges one faces. Distorts information and twists the hearing so it is not in favor of the person to receive the disability payments. She will even discredit their own doctors and not accept their evidence. She places so called experts on the stand that know nothing about the disabling conditions, than uses their testimonies.
She is so unprofessional. She discredits every doctor you have even if they are the treating physician. She outright states that there is a disability, but doesn't believe the doctors, even when there is FDA evidence of the challenges one faces. Distorts information and twists the hearing so it is not in favor of the person to receive the disability payments. She will even discredit their own doctors and not accept their evidence. She places so called experts on the stand that know nothing about the disabling conditions, than uses their testimonies.
Judge Hopson was lovely. She was very respectful and made the proceeding comfortable. She asked questions that showed she had reviewed the evidence. Judge Hopson genuinely cared about my sons disabilities. We are waiting for ruling via mail. Did not have lawyer.
Judge Hopson was lovely. She was very respectful and made the proceeding comfortable. She asked questions that showed she had reviewed the evidence. Judge Hopson genuinely cared about my sons disabilities. We are waiting for ruling via mail. Did not have lawyer.
Judge Hopson was lovely. She was very respectful and made the proceeding comfortable. She asked questions that showed she had reviewed the evidence. Judge Hopson genuinely cared about my sons disabilities. We are waiting for ruling via mail. Did not have lawyer.
I feel she is a bias judge and made my son feel very uncomfortable talking about is size and diability. I have done my researchand someone should contact the feds in regards to this bias in our system.
I feel she is a bias judge and made my son feel very uncomfortable talking about is size and diability. I have done my researchand someone should contact the feds in regards to this bias in our system.
I feel she is a bias judge and made my son feel very uncomfortable talking about is size and diability. I have done my researchand someone should contact the feds in regards to this bias in our system.
MY ADVICE: DO NOT GO INTO HER COURTROOM. Reschedule, find a new lawyer, whatever, but avoid her at all costs. Horrible, absolutely horrible. She breaks rules, the law, and still the appeal council does nothing. A useless parasite on the system. She ignores anything that any doctor you have ever seen has said, any claim of pain is "you're a liar", puts you into job categories you've never done and can't do because of your sciatic lumbar pain and arthritic knees, and literally fabricates testimony and evidence so that she can deny your claim. I've been through many custody hearings and by far Sharilyn Hopson is by far *the worst* judge/administrator I have ever come across.
MY ADVICE: DO NOT GO INTO HER COURTROOM. Reschedule, find a new lawyer, whatever, but avoid her at all costs. Horrible, absolutely horrible. She breaks rules, the law, and still the appeal council does nothing. A useless parasite on the system. She ignores anything that any doctor you have ever seen has said, any claim of pain is "you're a liar", puts you into job categories you've never done and can't do because of your sciatic lumbar pain and arthritic knees, and literally fabricates testimony and evidence so that she can deny your claim. I've been through many custody hearings and by far Sharilyn Hopson is by far *the worst* judge/administrator I have ever come across.
MY ADVICE: DO NOT GO INTO HER COURTROOM. Reschedule, find a new lawyer, whatever, but avoid her at all costs. Horrible, absolutely horrible. She breaks rules, the law, and still the appeal council does nothing. A useless parasite on the system. She ignores anything that any doctor you have ever seen has said, any claim of pain is "you're a liar", puts you into job categories you've never done and can't do because of your sciatic lumbar pain and arthritic knees, and literally fabricates testimony and evidence so that she can deny your claim. I've been through many custody hearings and by far Sharilyn Hopson is by far *the worst* judge/administrator I have ever come across.
I have a neuromuscular disease. She sent me to an internal medicine doctor. Then ignored the results. She told me she doesn't like me and that my doctors, my mother and I are all liars.
I have a neuromuscular disease. She sent me to an internal medicine doctor. Then ignored the results. She told me she doesn't like me and that my doctors, my mother and I are all liars.
I have a neuromuscular disease. She sent me to an internal medicine doctor. Then ignored the results. She told me she doesn't like me and that my doctors, my mother and I are all liars.
she is the worst judge ever please reshedule ssdi is the worst admin ever
she is the worst judge ever please reshedule ssdi is the worst admin ever
she is the worst judge ever please reshedule ssdi is the worst admin ever
I found Judge Hopson to be fair and forthright during my hearing She was familiar with my case file and was professional at all times.
I found Judge Hopson to be fair and forthright during my hearing She was familiar with my case file and was professional at all times.
I found Judge Hopson to be fair and forthright during my hearing She was familiar with my case file and was professional at all times.
Here’s my opinion of what you might expect if you have an SSD hearing with this Judge, based on my Wife’s experience; There’s a very good chance that she (The Judge) will have decided your case before you even step into her court room. Even though you are under oath to tell the truth your testimony, along with any witness you bring, will be given very little, if any, weight in determining you’re case. Regardless of your past work history, the severity of your injuries, and never applying for any Government assistance as many do multiple times, your future will be decided on the basis of a 5 to 10 minute examination by a Dr., along with the opinion of someone (Vocational Expert) who likely has never done the type of work you’ve done. One Dr. that the Judge sent my wife to (I was in the exam room also) examined her for no more than 5 minutes and spent half the time making jokes about cigars and puppies. Wow! No Doctor, anywhere, can determine the severity of a person’s pain and no one who hasn’t actually done the type of work you’ve done can know what’s “really” required by simply researching the internet. Yet, the Judge’s decision will almost be entirely based on those "opinions" and none of your sworn testimony. My wife had 2 major back surgeries and a third, inserting a titanium device, has been recommended. My wife worked over 36 years for one company and actually enjoyed her job. After her work injury doing work that, had she been given adequate help, would have never happened, her job was eliminated. During her efforts to seek help from our Government we have lost all of our savings. Had she been able to continue doing the only job she was ever trained for we would never have let this happen. My wife is one of those rare people who loved working. She will never be able to do the same work and, thanks to this Judge’s decision, we will likely lose much of what we worked so hard for. The sad part is so many people are out there cheating the system and getting away with it and we went through all the proper steps only to have no weight given to our testimony. During both my Wife’s and my testimony this Judge was actually yelling at our Attorney. During my testimony she drastically limited what our Attorney could ask me (by yelling and threatening to end the case right away) because she had somewhere she had to be and wanted the hearing to be completed quickly. SHE'S DECIDING THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION OF MY WIFE'S FUTURE AND WANT'S IT TO BE COMPLETED FAST BECAUSE SHE HAD SOMEWHERE ELSE TO BE! I realize this Judge may never read this but, just in case, Answer this Judge; Where does a 61 year old Woman who’s had 2 back surgeries, needs a third, and who can’t stand or sit for extended periods, will never be able to do the only work she has ever been trained for, thanks to no fault of her own, get work? I know, you don't care. All I can tell you is, if you have a hearing with this Judge, and who knows, maybe their all the same, GOOD LUCK.
Here’s my opinion of what you might expect if you have an SSD hearing with this Judge, based on my Wife’s experience; There’s a very good chance that she (The Judge) will have decided your case before you even step into her court room. Even though you are under oath to tell the truth your testimony, along with any witness you bring, will be given very little, if any, weight in determining you’re case. Regardless of your past work history, the severity of your injuries, and never applying for any Government assistance as many do multiple times, your future will be decided on the basis of a 5 to 10 minute examination by a Dr., along with the opinion of someone (Vocational Expert) who likely has never done the type of work you’ve done. One Dr. that the Judge sent my wife to (I was in the exam room also) examined her for no more than 5 minutes and spent half the time making jokes about cigars and puppies. Wow! No Doctor, anywhere, can determine the severity of a person’s pain and no one who hasn’t actually done the type of work you’ve done can know what’s “really” required by simply researching the internet. Yet, the Judge’s decision will almost be entirely based on those "opinions" and none of your sworn testimony. My wife had 2 major back surgeries and a third, inserting a titanium device, has been recommended. My wife worked over 36 years for one company and actually enjoyed her job. After her work injury doing work that, had she been given adequate help, would have never happened, her job was eliminated. During her efforts to seek help from our Government we have lost all of our savings. Had she been able to continue doing the only job she was ever trained for we would never have let this happen. My wife is one of those rare people who loved working. She will never be able to do the same work and, thanks to this Judge’s decision, we will likely lose much of what we worked so hard for. The sad part is so many people are out there cheating the system and getting away with it and we went through all the proper steps only to have no weight given to our testimony. During both my Wife’s and my testimony this Judge was actually yelling at our Attorney. During my testimony she drastically limited what our Attorney could ask me (by yelling and threatening to end the case right away) because she had somewhere she had to be and wanted the hearing to be completed quickly. SHE'S DECIDING THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION OF MY WIFE'S FUTURE AND WANT'S IT TO BE COMPLETED FAST BECAUSE SHE HAD SOMEWHERE ELSE TO BE! I realize this Judge may never read this but, just in case, Answer this Judge; Where does a 61 year old Woman who’s had 2 back surgeries, needs a third, and who can’t stand or sit for extended periods, will never be able to do the only work she has ever been trained for, thanks to no fault of her own, get work? I know, you don't care. All I can tell you is, if you have a hearing with this Judge, and who knows, maybe their all the same, GOOD LUCK.
Here’s my opinion of what you might expect if you have an SSD hearing with this Judge, based on my Wife’s experience; There’s a very good chance that she (The Judge) will have decided your case before you even step into her court room. Even though you are under oath to tell the truth your testimony, along with any witness you bring, will be given very little, if any, weight in determining you’re case. Regardless of your past work history, the severity of your injuries, and never applying for any Government assistance as many do multiple times, your future will be decided on the basis of a 5 to 10 minute examination by a Dr., along with the opinion of someone (Vocational Expert) who likely has never done the type of work you’ve done. One Dr. that the Judge sent my wife to (I was in the exam room also) examined her for no more than 5 minutes and spent half the time making jokes about cigars and puppies. Wow! No Doctor, anywhere, can determine the severity of a person’s pain and no one who hasn’t actually done the type of work you’ve done can know what’s “really” required by simply researching the internet. Yet, the Judge’s decision will almost be entirely based on those "opinions" and none of your sworn testimony. My wife had 2 major back surgeries and a third, inserting a titanium device, has been recommended. My wife worked over 36 years for one company and actually enjoyed her job. After her work injury doing work that, had she been given adequate help, would have never happened, her job was eliminated. During her efforts to seek help from our Government we have lost all of our savings. Had she been able to continue doing the only job she was ever trained for we would never have let this happen. My wife is one of those rare people who loved working. She will never be able to do the same work and, thanks to this Judge’s decision, we will likely lose much of what we worked so hard for. The sad part is so many people are out there cheating the system and getting away with it and we went through all the proper steps only to have no weight given to our testimony. During both my Wife’s and my testimony this Judge was actually yelling at our Attorney. During my testimony she drastically limited what our Attorney could ask me (by yelling and threatening to end the case right away) because she had somewhere she had to be and wanted the hearing to be completed quickly. SHE'S DECIDING THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION OF MY WIFE'S FUTURE AND WANT'S IT TO BE COMPLETED FAST BECAUSE SHE HAD SOMEWHERE ELSE TO BE! I realize this Judge may never read this but, just in case, Answer this Judge; Where does a 61 year old Woman who’s had 2 back surgeries, needs a third, and who can’t stand or sit for extended periods, will never be able to do the only work she has ever been trained for, thanks to no fault of her own, get work? I know, you don't care. All I can tell you is, if you have a hearing with this Judge, and who knows, maybe their all the same, GOOD LUCK.
She is the worst. I have gone to a geneticist for proof of my disability and she said I could have printed that out on my own computer. She thinks all of my doctors are liars. My cardiologist Pulmonary Neurologist GI doctor Opthomology Apparently the fact that my disability has given me a shortened life span doesn't matter to her. She doesn't give a shit about anyone.
She is the worst. I have gone to a geneticist for proof of my disability and she said I could have printed that out on my own computer. She thinks all of my doctors are liars. My cardiologist Pulmonary Neurologist GI doctor Opthomology Apparently the fact that my disability has given me a shortened life span doesn't matter to her. She doesn't give a shit about anyone.
She is the worst. I have gone to a geneticist for proof of my disability and she said I could have printed that out on my own computer. She thinks all of my doctors are liars. My cardiologist Pulmonary Neurologist GI doctor Opthomology Apparently the fact that my disability has given me a shortened life span doesn't matter to her. She doesn't give a shit about anyone.
Cancel your court date if this is your judge
Cancel your court date if this is your judge
Cancel your court date if this is your judge
With all due respect, she is a terrible Judge. I agree that she failed to properly look at obvious medical evidence that was provided for my mom’s case. It shows when a person has had little experience truly understanding medical evidence (I worked in the medical field for seven years and dealt with enough of these people to understand this). She asked my mom what she did all day. My mom kindly responded, “Not much.” This response made perfect sense considering my mom is DISABLED you asshole. She thought it was proper to respond, “That sounds like a long day.” NO SHIT. When we have multiple sources of evidence from multiple doctors saying she CANNOT WORK, any other response from her would have negated all the evidence. She is the reason people like me have no faith in the “system.”
With all due respect, she is a terrible Judge. I agree that she failed to properly look at obvious medical evidence that was provided for my mom’s case. It shows when a person has had little experience truly understanding medical evidence (I worked in the medical field for seven years and dealt with enough of these people to understand this). She asked my mom what she did all day. My mom kindly responded, “Not much.” This response made perfect sense considering my mom is DISABLED you asshole. She thought it was proper to respond, “That sounds like a long day.” NO SHIT. When we have multiple sources of evidence from multiple doctors saying she CANNOT WORK, any other response from her would have negated all the evidence. She is the reason people like me have no faith in the “system.”
With all due respect, she is a terrible Judge. I agree that she failed to properly look at obvious medical evidence that was provided for my mom’s case. It shows when a person has had little experience truly understanding medical evidence (I worked in the medical field for seven years and dealt with enough of these people to understand this). She asked my mom what she did all day. My mom kindly responded, “Not much.” This response made perfect sense considering my mom is DISABLED you asshole. She thought it was proper to respond, “That sounds like a long day.” NO SHIT. When we have multiple sources of evidence from multiple doctors saying she CANNOT WORK, any other response from her would have negated all the evidence. She is the reason people like me have no faith in the “system.”
She is a good judge. She is direct and expects you to know your case. Not sure why so many bad reviews. If you have a weak case doesn’t mean she is a bad judge I had a hearing with her today. She listened and was fair.
She is a good judge. She is direct and expects you to know your case. Not sure why so many bad reviews. If you have a weak case doesn’t mean she is a bad judge I had a hearing with her today. She listened and was fair.
She is a good judge. She is direct and expects you to know your case. Not sure why so many bad reviews. If you have a weak case doesn’t mean she is a bad judge I had a hearing with her today. She listened and was fair.
In Greek, we have an expression for a person like Judge Sharilyn. We say "mavri kardia' which translated means 'black heart'...we can imagine her shrill laughter upon reading this.
THE HONORABLE ( ?? ) JUDGE KAYS IS AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE BENCH. HE SORELY LACKS THE NECESSARY ATTRIBUTE OF BEING ANALYTICAL...SOMETHING CRUCIAL TO THE FAIR AND PROPER ADJUDICATION OF SSI CASES. OH, AND BY THE WAY...NEVER GET A CASE REMANDED BACK TO HIM BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL, A 3-JUDGE PANEL OF HIS SUPERIORS....HE WILL DENY YOUR CLAIM A-G-A-I-N FOR SURE, REGARDLESS OF IT'S MERIT. IN SUMMATION, JUDE KAYS IS AN ARROGANT, NAROW-MINDED PAPER PUSHER, WHO LACKS THE COMMON SENSE AND JURISPRUDENT INTELLIGENCE TO FUNCTION IN A REAL COURT SETTING, SO HE HIDES IN THE ODAR WHERE HE SEEMS TO RUN UNCHECKED, RENDERING HIS UNFAIR AND RANDOM DECISIONS BASED ON HOW HE FEELS THAT PARTICULAR DAY, AND MAYBE DEPENDING ON WHETHER HE GOT LAID THE NIGHT BEFORE. MAY THIS SO-CALLED JUDGE FACE A TIME IN HIS LIFE WHEN HE WILL BE DENIED THE COMPASSION HE FAILS TO SHOW OTHERS. **** WAS MADE FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM, AND MAY HE MAKE THE TRIP SOON!
THE HONORABLE ( ?? ) JUDGE KAYS IS AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE BENCH. HE SORELY LACKS THE NECESSARY ATTRIBUTE OF BEING ANALYTICAL...SOMETHING CRUCIAL TO THE FAIR AND PROPER ADJUDICATION OF SSI CASES. OH, AND BY THE WAY...NEVER GET A CASE REMANDED BACK TO HIM BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL, A 3-JUDGE PANEL OF HIS SUPERIORS....HE WILL DENY YOUR CLAIM A-G-A-I-N FOR SURE, REGARDLESS OF IT'S MERIT. IN SUMMATION, JUDE KAYS IS AN ARROGANT, NAROW-MINDED PAPER PUSHER, WHO LACKS THE COMMON SENSE AND JURISPRUDENT INTELLIGENCE TO FUNCTION IN A REAL COURT SETTING, SO HE HIDES IN THE ODAR WHERE HE SEEMS TO RUN UNCHECKED, RENDERING HIS UNFAIR AND RANDOM DECISIONS BASED ON HOW HE FEELS THAT PARTICULAR DAY, AND MAYBE DEPENDING ON WHETHER HE GOT LAID THE NIGHT BEFORE. MAY THIS SO-CALLED JUDGE FACE A TIME IN HIS LIFE WHEN HE WILL BE DENIED THE COMPASSION HE FAILS TO SHOW OTHERS. **** WAS MADE FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM, AND MAY HE MAKE THE TRIP SOON!
THE HONORABLE ( ?? ) JUDGE KAYS IS AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE BENCH. HE SORELY LACKS THE NECESSARY ATTRIBUTE OF BEING ANALYTICAL...SOMETHING CRUCIAL TO THE FAIR AND PROPER ADJUDICATION OF SSI CASES. OH, AND BY THE WAY...NEVER GET A CASE REMANDED BACK TO HIM BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL, A 3-JUDGE PANEL OF HIS SUPERIORS....HE WILL DENY YOUR CLAIM A-G-A-I-N FOR SURE, REGARDLESS OF IT'S MERIT. IN SUMMATION, JUDE KAYS IS AN ARROGANT, NAROW-MINDED PAPER PUSHER, WHO LACKS THE COMMON SENSE AND JURISPRUDENT INTELLIGENCE TO FUNCTION IN A REAL COURT SETTING, SO HE HIDES IN THE ODAR WHERE HE SEEMS TO RUN UNCHECKED, RENDERING HIS UNFAIR AND RANDOM DECISIONS BASED ON HOW HE FEELS THAT PARTICULAR DAY, AND MAYBE DEPENDING ON WHETHER HE GOT LAID THE NIGHT BEFORE. MAY THIS SO-CALLED JUDGE FACE A TIME IN HIS LIFE WHEN HE WILL BE DENIED THE COMPASSION HE FAILS TO SHOW OTHERS. **** WAS MADE FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM, AND MAY HE MAKE THE TRIP SOON!
I can't believe the negative comment above even remotely has anything to do with Judge Kays. He's super knowledgeable, professional, and clearly reads and knows the file prior to the hearing. We don't win every case in front of him, but he treats our clients fairly.
I can't believe the negative comment above even remotely has anything to do with Judge Kays. He's super knowledgeable, professional, and clearly reads and knows the file prior to the hearing. We don't win every case in front of him, but he treats our clients fairly.
I can't believe the negative comment above even remotely has anything to do with Judge Kays. He's super knowledgeable, professional, and clearly reads and knows the file prior to the hearing. We don't win every case in front of him, but he treats our clients fairly.
Judge John Kays was such a pleasure to see in today's system. He was very knowledgable, professional and wise. He allowed me to tell my story and listened patiently. He is what our country stands for! Honorable Man.
Judge John Kays was such a pleasure to see in today's system. He was very knowledgable, professional and wise. He allowed me to tell my story and listened patiently. He is what our country stands for! Honorable Man.
Judge John Kays was such a pleasure to see in today's system. He was very knowledgable, professional and wise. He allowed me to tell my story and listened patiently. He is what our country stands for! Honorable Man.
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH JERRY YOUNKIN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF JOHN KAYS- IS INCOMPETENT!
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH JERRY YOUNKIN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF JOHN KAYS- IS INCOMPETENT!
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH JERRY YOUNKIN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF JOHN KAYS- IS INCOMPETENT!
Everything was going wrong, telephone wasn't working, time was passing, yet Judge Kays kept his composure. He moved the hearing to another room, put up with my lack of courtroom manners and dealt fairly on every issue. When someone says lawyers are bad and judges are false hearted, I'm going to break in and say,"let me tell you a story about a rational, smart, fair judge named John Kays." Justice still wins out in California!
Everything was going wrong, telephone wasn't working, time was passing, yet Judge Kays kept his composure. He moved the hearing to another room, put up with my lack of courtroom manners and dealt fairly on every issue. When someone says lawyers are bad and judges are false hearted, I'm going to break in and say,"let me tell you a story about a rational, smart, fair judge named John Kays." Justice still wins out in California!
Everything was going wrong, telephone wasn't working, time was passing, yet Judge Kays kept his composure. He moved the hearing to another room, put up with my lack of courtroom manners and dealt fairly on every issue. When someone says lawyers are bad and judges are false hearted, I'm going to break in and say,"let me tell you a story about a rational, smart, fair judge named John Kays." Justice still wins out in California!
Judge John Kays was the worst experience I have ever had with our legal system. He did not allow me to explain my situation, in fact the only thing he said to me "on the record" was "good morning". He then went on to converse with my attorney and inform her that he had one report from an urgent care doctor that SS sent me to for evaluation in which he was referencing..out of 8 doctors and 1 of them a specialist at a very well known Clinic, he was going to make his decision off of that one doctor and deny my claim, because as he said "It's his job and he can review the entire case if he wants too and that's what he was going to do". It seemed this judge had made up his mind before even seeing me, wasting my gas, and time. As soon as I walked in the room he stared me down and continued to stare at me during the entire 3 minutes of my "hearing", in which he did not hear me or talk to me at all. In my opinion, this was a waste of time and this judge is NOT fair,and seems to have a "God" complex. He never asked me any questions or allowed ME to explain my case, cause he was gonna do what he wanted to because he could and that was that. Terrible experience. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge. Beware!!
Judge John Kays was the worst experience I have ever had with our legal system. He did not allow me to explain my situation, in fact the only thing he said to me "on the record" was "good morning". He then went on to converse with my attorney and inform her that he had one report from an urgent care doctor that SS sent me to for evaluation in which he was referencing..out of 8 doctors and 1 of them a specialist at a very well known Clinic, he was going to make his decision off of that one doctor and deny my claim, because as he said "It's his job and he can review the entire case if he wants too and that's what he was going to do". It seemed this judge had made up his mind before even seeing me, wasting my gas, and time. As soon as I walked in the room he stared me down and continued to stare at me during the entire 3 minutes of my "hearing", in which he did not hear me or talk to me at all. In my opinion, this was a waste of time and this judge is NOT fair,and seems to have a "God" complex. He never asked me any questions or allowed ME to explain my case, cause he was gonna do what he wanted to because he could and that was that. Terrible experience. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge. Beware!!
Judge John Kays was the worst experience I have ever had with our legal system. He did not allow me to explain my situation, in fact the only thing he said to me "on the record" was "good morning". He then went on to converse with my attorney and inform her that he had one report from an urgent care doctor that SS sent me to for evaluation in which he was referencing..out of 8 doctors and 1 of them a specialist at a very well known Clinic, he was going to make his decision off of that one doctor and deny my claim, because as he said "It's his job and he can review the entire case if he wants too and that's what he was going to do". It seemed this judge had made up his mind before even seeing me, wasting my gas, and time. As soon as I walked in the room he stared me down and continued to stare at me during the entire 3 minutes of my "hearing", in which he did not hear me or talk to me at all. In my opinion, this was a waste of time and this judge is NOT fair,and seems to have a "God" complex. He never asked me any questions or allowed ME to explain my case, cause he was gonna do what he wanted to because he could and that was that. Terrible experience. I feel bad for anyone who gets this judge. Beware!!
Judge John Kay's ? Was very understanding and fair.He know his stuff and also take the time to listen to you. I Did not get any negative feed back from him I was honored to have him as a judge...
Judge John Kay's ? Was very understanding and fair.He know his stuff and also take the time to listen to you. I Did not get any negative feed back from him I was honored to have him as a judge...
Judge John Kay's ? Was very understanding and fair.He know his stuff and also take the time to listen to you. I Did not get any negative feed back from him I was honored to have him as a judge...
The Due Diligence The care one takes in a particular situation . The weight given to the evidence The claimants direct testimony there word under oath to speak the truth You know the truth dont have regulations federal,state,county,city regulations Being in the conditiion of being disabled Unable to move about normal bodily functions being impaired witb certainty That the impairment will become a medical determined impairment over a period of impairing the bodily function from occurring For instance what truthfully disables me is being homeless living on the street slleeping on concrete people walk across daily surely within time will cause skin lesions and infectioon to compound that issue the over exposure to the sun and heat will fry your skin even further burning lesions into your skin that get infected because you have no place to adequately care for the lesions medically and everytime you try to get medical treatment they put a internal hold on your medical insurance so the doctor wont see you or you get medical bills on your credit report because being unemoloyed barred from employment from some person that under his job duty he assaukted you causing personal injury that disabled you and further kept you out of the employment arena and then the same assaulter threatened to black bal you in the county you live and work in and now ten years later yiu still have nit been employed you have become homeless on the street you realuze the threat was real he did blackball your name and your life now is the proof of it You cant even use the bathrooms in businesses because they bar from you the right to use the bathroom so you naturally have to relieve yourself and do so accordungly onky your in public snd a cop gives you a ticket for indecent exposure and the looks you get from other customers but the truth is from being denied use it has caused medically determined impairment of incontinency and if you didnt expose yourself to do the normal bodily function of relueving yourself then you would most suredly piss your pants or shit your pants and well now your a public humiliation to yourself and all parti cipants in the denial of key to bathroom that led up to your incontinence problem But again the medical hold due to error they need to fix prevents your incontinency from being medically treated There is the truth of my dire need critical case and i guess i would have to change my clothes in public so i dont get a staph infection before i can make it across town to a job interview because they want to see the ostraizatiin of me as well I worked thirty years Im a displaced worker unable to work due to my critical dire need living situation of homeless and not being from the flood control outreach area i didnt get housed But the judge did make very siund decision in a 12 year old claim that is one big error Thank you Julie lynn hannon
The Due Diligence The care one takes in a particular situation . The weight given to the evidence The claimants direct testimony there word under oath to speak the truth You know the truth dont have regulations federal,state,county,city regulations Being in the conditiion of being disabled Unable to move about normal bodily functions being impaired witb certainty That the impairment will become a medical determined impairment over a period of impairing the bodily function from occurring For instance what truthfully disables me is being homeless living on the street slleeping on concrete people walk across daily surely within time will cause skin lesions and infectioon to compound that issue the over exposure to the sun and heat will fry your skin even further burning lesions into your skin that get infected because you have no place to adequately care for the lesions medically and everytime you try to get medical treatment they put a internal hold on your medical insurance so the doctor wont see you or you get medical bills on your credit report because being unemoloyed barred from employment from some person that under his job duty he assaukted you causing personal injury that disabled you and further kept you out of the employment arena and then the same assaulter threatened to black bal you in the county you live and work in and now ten years later yiu still have nit been employed you have become homeless on the street you realuze the threat was real he did blackball your name and your life now is the proof of it You cant even use the bathrooms in businesses because they bar from you the right to use the bathroom so you naturally have to relieve yourself and do so accordungly onky your in public snd a cop gives you a ticket for indecent exposure and the looks you get from other customers but the truth is from being denied use it has caused medically determined impairment of incontinency and if you didnt expose yourself to do the normal bodily function of relueving yourself then you would most suredly piss your pants or shit your pants and well now your a public humiliation to yourself and all parti cipants in the denial of key to bathroom that led up to your incontinence problem But again the medical hold due to error they need to fix prevents your incontinency from being medically treated There is the truth of my dire need critical case and i guess i would have to change my clothes in public so i dont get a staph infection before i can make it across town to a job interview because they want to see the ostraizatiin of me as well I worked thirty years Im a displaced worker unable to work due to my critical dire need living situation of homeless and not being from the flood control outreach area i didnt get housed But the judge did make very siund decision in a 12 year old claim that is one big error Thank you Julie lynn hannon
The Due Diligence The care one takes in a particular situation . The weight given to the evidence The claimants direct testimony there word under oath to speak the truth You know the truth dont have regulations federal,state,county,city regulations Being in the conditiion of being disabled Unable to move about normal bodily functions being impaired witb certainty That the impairment will become a medical determined impairment over a period of impairing the bodily function from occurring For instance what truthfully disables me is being homeless living on the street slleeping on concrete people walk across daily surely within time will cause skin lesions and infectioon to compound that issue the over exposure to the sun and heat will fry your skin even further burning lesions into your skin that get infected because you have no place to adequately care for the lesions medically and everytime you try to get medical treatment they put a internal hold on your medical insurance so the doctor wont see you or you get medical bills on your credit report because being unemoloyed barred from employment from some person that under his job duty he assaukted you causing personal injury that disabled you and further kept you out of the employment arena and then the same assaulter threatened to black bal you in the county you live and work in and now ten years later yiu still have nit been employed you have become homeless on the street you realuze the threat was real he did blackball your name and your life now is the proof of it You cant even use the bathrooms in businesses because they bar from you the right to use the bathroom so you naturally have to relieve yourself and do so accordungly onky your in public snd a cop gives you a ticket for indecent exposure and the looks you get from other customers but the truth is from being denied use it has caused medically determined impairment of incontinency and if you didnt expose yourself to do the normal bodily function of relueving yourself then you would most suredly piss your pants or shit your pants and well now your a public humiliation to yourself and all parti cipants in the denial of key to bathroom that led up to your incontinence problem But again the medical hold due to error they need to fix prevents your incontinency from being medically treated There is the truth of my dire need critical case and i guess i would have to change my clothes in public so i dont get a staph infection before i can make it across town to a job interview because they want to see the ostraizatiin of me as well I worked thirty years Im a displaced worker unable to work due to my critical dire need living situation of homeless and not being from the flood control outreach area i didnt get housed But the judge did make very siund decision in a 12 year old claim that is one big error Thank you Julie lynn hannon
POS. I had a heart attack in June. This so called judge actually cited my missing of appointments in June as a reason to stop my benefits. All was based on a 5 minute quiz by some shrink I have never seen before or since. Railroaded. Kay's is either incompetent, or simply has bad judgement. He is horrible.
POS. I had a heart attack in June. This so called judge actually cited my missing of appointments in June as a reason to stop my benefits. All was based on a 5 minute quiz by some shrink I have never seen before or since. Railroaded. Kay's is either incompetent, or simply has bad judgement. He is horrible.
POS. I had a heart attack in June. This so called judge actually cited my missing of appointments in June as a reason to stop my benefits. All was based on a 5 minute quiz by some shrink I have never seen before or since. Railroaded. Kay's is either incompetent, or simply has bad judgement. He is horrible.
Kays is DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT.
Kays is DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT.
Kays is DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT.
He was kind and compassionate during the hearing. He clearly knew all the facts of my case—which contained a lot of information. He was very professional and fair regarding the disposition, which he completed quickly. He is a great Judge.
He was kind and compassionate during the hearing. He clearly knew all the facts of my case—which contained a lot of information. He was very professional and fair regarding the disposition, which he completed quickly. He is a great Judge.
He was kind and compassionate during the hearing. He clearly knew all the facts of my case—which contained a lot of information. He was very professional and fair regarding the disposition, which he completed quickly. He is a great Judge.
I was very intimidated by this entire process and Judge Kays almost insisted that I find a good attorney and he postponed my first hearing. The fact that he cared enough to give me advice made him more human to me. By the second hearing I was less intimidated as he calmly and gently asked me questions (hearing by phone). He was very patient with me as I no longer have the capacity to articulate every thought and idea as I once did. I will always remain grateful to him for his compassion towards me in my darkest hour. I don't know how anyone could say this judge has no compassion. Look at all the cases he has approved. I guess every case is different. Mine was a difficult one. But he understood.
I was very intimidated by this entire process and Judge Kays almost insisted that I find a good attorney and he postponed my first hearing. The fact that he cared enough to give me advice made him more human to me. By the second hearing I was less intimidated as he calmly and gently asked me questions (hearing by phone). He was very patient with me as I no longer have the capacity to articulate every thought and idea as I once did. I will always remain grateful to him for his compassion towards me in my darkest hour. I don't know how anyone could say this judge has no compassion. Look at all the cases he has approved. I guess every case is different. Mine was a difficult one. But he understood.
Thank you so much for your kindness and thoughtful consideration. I truely appreciate the hard work that you do everyday.
Thank you so much for your kindness and thoughtful consideration. I truely appreciate the hard work that you do everyday.
Thank you so much for your kindness and thoughtful consideration. I truely appreciate the hard work that you do everyday.
I thought your ruling was not well thought out, lacking substance, and missing clear points. I think such a ruling, should take careful consideration, instead of a quick glance and obvious "jump" to the wrong conclusion.
I thought your ruling was not well thought out, lacking substance, and missing clear points. I think such a ruling, should take careful consideration, instead of a quick glance and obvious "jump" to the wrong conclusion.
I thought your ruling was not well thought out, lacking substance, and missing clear points. I think such a ruling, should take careful consideration, instead of a quick glance and obvious "jump" to the wrong conclusion.
She is a total nightmare. She wasn't fair, nor courteous. She was actually downright rude. She barely allowed me to speak. She interrupted me consistently. I was in horrific pain that day and she yelled at me by saying (and I quote) "What is wrong with you, I don't understand!" I'm disabled. That's what was wrong! She is completely unprofessional and emotionally abusive. I felt worse after our hearing. I actually had to go to the ER after that hearing. Thank the Heavens I was a blessed with a sympathetic judge at my Remanded Appeal Hearing afterwards. KERINS MADE ME WAIT AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS on top of the one and a half years I had already been waiting. If your case is to be heard before this woman... Be prepared to wait another 2-3 years. Run for the hills. Request another ALJ. It may be time for Kerins to retire. Someone in upper management or government needs to take a serious look at how she handles her cases. Sincerely, Treated Badly
She is a total nightmare. She wasn't fair, nor courteous. She was actually downright rude. She barely allowed me to speak. She interrupted me consistently. I was in horrific pain that day and she yelled at me by saying (and I quote) "What is wrong with you, I don't understand!" I'm disabled. That's what was wrong! She is completely unprofessional and emotionally abusive. I felt worse after our hearing. I actually had to go to the ER after that hearing. Thank the Heavens I was a blessed with a sympathetic judge at my Remanded Appeal Hearing afterwards. KERINS MADE ME WAIT AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS on top of the one and a half years I had already been waiting. If your case is to be heard before this woman... Be prepared to wait another 2-3 years. Run for the hills. Request another ALJ. It may be time for Kerins to retire. Someone in upper management or government needs to take a serious look at how she handles her cases. Sincerely, Treated Badly
She is a total nightmare. She wasn't fair, nor courteous. She was actually downright rude. She barely allowed me to speak. She interrupted me consistently. I was in horrific pain that day and she yelled at me by saying (and I quote) "What is wrong with you, I don't understand!" I'm disabled. That's what was wrong! She is completely unprofessional and emotionally abusive. I felt worse after our hearing. I actually had to go to the ER after that hearing. Thank the Heavens I was a blessed with a sympathetic judge at my Remanded Appeal Hearing afterwards. KERINS MADE ME WAIT AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS on top of the one and a half years I had already been waiting. If your case is to be heard before this woman... Be prepared to wait another 2-3 years. Run for the hills. Request another ALJ. It may be time for Kerins to retire. Someone in upper management or government needs to take a serious look at how she handles her cases. Sincerely, Treated Badly
Judge Lisiecki was a really nice and fair judge I still am waiting for my decision and of course hopes its favorable or at least partially favorable. My health issues have gotten worse after the hearing and since leukemia runs in my family I am a bit extra scared being a single mom of an amazing 6 year old little girl. I know I have to accept whatever the outcome but I sure hope it's in my favor.
Judge Lisiecki was a really nice and fair judge I still am waiting for my decision and of course hopes its favorable or at least partially favorable. My health issues have gotten worse after the hearing and since leukemia runs in my family I am a bit extra scared being a single mom of an amazing 6 year old little girl. I know I have to accept whatever the outcome but I sure hope it's in my favor.
Judge Lisiecki was a really nice and fair judge I still am waiting for my decision and of course hopes its favorable or at least partially favorable. My health issues have gotten worse after the hearing and since leukemia runs in my family I am a bit extra scared being a single mom of an amazing 6 year old little girl. I know I have to accept whatever the outcome but I sure hope it's in my favor.
Judge Lisiecki made me feel by his questioning that he read all of my medical records thoroughly. His write-up for his decision was very thorough as well. He dissected all doctors' opinions in his decision write-up. Tough judge
Judge Lisiecki made me feel by his questioning that he read all of my medical records thoroughly. His write-up for his decision was very thorough as well. He dissected all doctors' opinions in his decision write-up. Tough judge
Judge Lisiecki made me feel by his questioning that he read all of my medical records thoroughly. His write-up for his decision was very thorough as well. He dissected all doctors' opinions in his decision write-up. Tough judge
As an attorney rep, I can express that my experience with this judge was very positive. He is professional, courteous and empathetic. If you have a hearing scheduled with this judge, you can be absolutely certain he is a fair and honest jurist.
As an attorney rep, I can express that my experience with this judge was very positive. He is professional, courteous and empathetic. If you have a hearing scheduled with this judge, you can be absolutely certain he is a fair and honest jurist.
As an attorney rep, I can express that my experience with this judge was very positive. He is professional, courteous and empathetic. If you have a hearing scheduled with this judge, you can be absolutely certain he is a fair and honest jurist.
My judge in my case wad fair, and veary professional i must say. He ask alot of great questions to me, most i dont rember. A veary careing judge who i beleave takes great pride in his job. Regardless of how my case turns out i beleave god gave me the best judge i could ask for.
My judge in my case wad fair, and veary professional i must say. He ask alot of great questions to me, most i dont rember. A veary careing judge who i beleave takes great pride in his job. Regardless of how my case turns out i beleave god gave me the best judge i could ask for.
My judge in my case wad fair, and veary professional i must say. He ask alot of great questions to me, most i dont rember. A veary careing judge who i beleave takes great pride in his job. Regardless of how my case turns out i beleave god gave me the best judge i could ask for.
Very professional and compassionate.
Very professional and compassionate.
Very professional and compassionate.
He is nice at the hearings but it looks denies a lot of his cases. He will allow you to make and opening/closing.
He is nice at the hearings but it looks denies a lot of his cases. He will allow you to make and opening/closing.
He is nice at the hearings but it looks denies a lot of his cases. He will allow you to make and opening/closing.
He is very nice, calm and pleasant in the court room, but has no clue how to make a descision! He contradicted him self in my denial letter, stating I was extremely symptomatic when in hot environments, and is unable to stay standing for longer than 10 mins. THen he says the job I can do is a Parking lot attendant. Come on man it is 115 degrees in arizona how can I be a prking lot attendant! No CLue!!!!! I have now started a new claim and am already on my redecision. THey said they have to uphold his decision. Hello
He is very nice, calm and pleasant in the court room, but has no clue how to make a descision! He contradicted him self in my denial letter, stating I was extremely symptomatic when in hot environments, and is unable to stay standing for longer than 10 mins. THen he says the job I can do is a Parking lot attendant. Come on man it is 115 degrees in arizona how can I be a prking lot attendant! No CLue!!!!! I have now started a new claim and am already on my redecision. THey said they have to uphold his decision. Hello
He is very nice, calm and pleasant in the court room, but has no clue how to make a descision! He contradicted him self in my denial letter, stating I was extremely symptomatic when in hot environments, and is unable to stay standing for longer than 10 mins. THen he says the job I can do is a Parking lot attendant. Come on man it is 115 degrees in arizona how can I be a prking lot attendant! No CLue!!!!! I have now started a new claim and am already on my redecision. THey said they have to uphold his decision. Hello
Regardless of the outcome, I feel like he was open to listen to what I had to say, which is rare for any California Magistrate that I have ever met or had to speak with during litigation. He is fair, but it seems like he denies a lot of cases, which is of no fault of his, you people fail to realize, he is responsible on a level that we will never understand. So even if he denies my case, I am grateful to the US Federal Government and the State of California for hearing my testimony.
Regardless of the outcome, I feel like he was open to listen to what I had to say, which is rare for any California Magistrate that I have ever met or had to speak with during litigation. He is fair, but it seems like he denies a lot of cases, which is of no fault of his, you people fail to realize, he is responsible on a level that we will never understand. So even if he denies my case, I am grateful to the US Federal Government and the State of California for hearing my testimony.
Regardless of the outcome, I feel like he was open to listen to what I had to say, which is rare for any California Magistrate that I have ever met or had to speak with during litigation. He is fair, but it seems like he denies a lot of cases, which is of no fault of his, you people fail to realize, he is responsible on a level that we will never understand. So even if he denies my case, I am grateful to the US Federal Government and the State of California for hearing my testimony.
Even if he denies my case, I feel that he was a fair judge. He took the time to listen to what you had to say, and like everyone says, he allows you to make an opening and ending statement, which I feel like I should have done, but I had my attorney with me. You can't take his decision personally, even if this site says that he denies most of his cases, his job is on a level that many of us will never understand. The system works slow, but it does work.
Even if he denies my case, I feel that he was a fair judge. He took the time to listen to what you had to say, and like everyone says, he allows you to make an opening and ending statement, which I feel like I should have done, but I had my attorney with me. You can't take his decision personally, even if this site says that he denies most of his cases, his job is on a level that many of us will never understand. The system works slow, but it does work.
Even if he denies my case, I feel that he was a fair judge. He took the time to listen to what you had to say, and like everyone says, he allows you to make an opening and ending statement, which I feel like I should have done, but I had my attorney with me. You can't take his decision personally, even if this site says that he denies most of his cases, his job is on a level that many of us will never understand. The system works slow, but it does work.
In my case, it was already decided and it was in my favor, but when he wanted to see my medical file to check on some notes, it was not in the hearing to begin with, and he postponed a month for the file to be ordered for a decision in the following month. It has been going for almost (4) without any results. My attorney fault for not being prepared at the hearing.
In my case, it was already decided and it was in my favor, but when he wanted to see my medical file to check on some notes, it was not in the hearing to begin with, and he postponed a month for the file to be ordered for a decision in the following month. It has been going for almost (4) without any results. My attorney fault for not being prepared at the hearing.
In my case, it was already decided and it was in my favor, but when he wanted to see my medical file to check on some notes, it was not in the hearing to begin with, and he postponed a month for the file to be ordered for a decision in the following month. It has been going for almost (4) without any results. My attorney fault for not being prepared at the hearing.
This judge will smile, act pleasant, then deny you. He will give zero weight to your Dr, and all credibility goes to a medical expert (who's never seen you). He also thinks someone with serious back conditions can lift, squat,bend, stoop and crawl. He will give no weight to how you suffer on a daily basis, making it impossible to work. It's no wonder his denials are so high.....
This judge will smile, act pleasant, then deny you. He will give zero weight to your Dr, and all credibility goes to a medical expert (who's never seen you). He also thinks someone with serious back conditions can lift, squat,bend, stoop and crawl. He will give no weight to how you suffer on a daily basis, making it impossible to work. It's no wonder his denials are so high.....
This judge will smile, act pleasant, then deny you. He will give zero weight to your Dr, and all credibility goes to a medical expert (who's never seen you). He also thinks someone with serious back conditions can lift, squat,bend, stoop and crawl. He will give no weight to how you suffer on a daily basis, making it impossible to work. It's no wonder his denials are so high.....
Went to court today and had this judge. Won't know for several months the outcome but the hearing was were simple and don't worry about this judge being a problem. GIVES THE IMPRESSION HE IS A GOOD JUDGE. I may not win my case but he made it easy to be there and speak. Thank you....
Went to court today and had this judge. Won't know for several months the outcome but the hearing was were simple and don't worry about this judge being a problem. GIVES THE IMPRESSION HE IS A GOOD JUDGE. I may not win my case but he made it easy to be there and speak. Thank you....
Went to court today and had this judge. Won't know for several months the outcome but the hearing was were simple and don't worry about this judge being a problem. GIVES THE IMPRESSION HE IS A GOOD JUDGE. I may not win my case but he made it easy to be there and speak. Thank you....
I just had my hearing last week, I was so nervous walking into the room but he made me feel at ease, I believe he is a fair judge, they have a tough job at hand, considering the time they are given to make decisions, I thank him for listening to my concerns and for being very respectful
I just had my hearing last week, I was so nervous walking into the room but he made me feel at ease, I believe he is a fair judge, they have a tough job at hand, considering the time they are given to make decisions, I thank him for listening to my concerns and for being very respectful
I just had my hearing last week, I was so nervous walking into the room but he made me feel at ease, I believe he is a fair judge, they have a tough job at hand, considering the time they are given to make decisions, I thank him for listening to my concerns and for being very respectful
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Due to the glut of cases, a person can expect an assembly line hearing from this judge. He can seem fair in his demeanor and may even concede a few points in your favor, but don't be confused. Once the ruling comes in the mail, he'll be revealed as another cog in an unforgiving bureaucracy whose role is to absolve Social Security of its epic follies.
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Due to the glut of cases, a person can expect an assembly line hearing from this judge. He can seem fair in his demeanor and may even concede a few points in your favor, but don't be confused. Once the ruling comes in the mail, he'll be revealed as another cog in an unforgiving bureaucracy whose role is to absolve Social Security of its epic follies.
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Due to the glut of cases, a person can expect an assembly line hearing from this judge. He can seem fair in his demeanor and may even concede a few points in your favor, but don't be confused. Once the ruling comes in the mail, he'll be revealed as another cog in an unforgiving bureaucracy whose role is to absolve Social Security of its epic follies.
I had my hearing on 02/19/2020 with Judge Markiewicz. He was kind, respectful, and pleasant. He smiled, laughed and made you feel comfortable. He spoke clearly and knew the facts of my case. I felt he listened and paid attention when I spoke. He seems to be a just and fair Judge.
I had my hearing on 02/19/2020 with Judge Markiewicz. He was kind, respectful, and pleasant. He smiled, laughed and made you feel comfortable. He spoke clearly and knew the facts of my case. I felt he listened and paid attention when I spoke. He seems to be a just and fair Judge.
I had my hearing on 02/19/2020 with Judge Markiewicz. He was kind, respectful, and pleasant. He smiled, laughed and made you feel comfortable. He spoke clearly and knew the facts of my case. I felt he listened and paid attention when I spoke. He seems to be a just and fair Judge.
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
this judge listened to my case she is very proffesional very effeciant going into her court was like how i ran my crew when i could work a well oiled machine
this judge listened to my case she is very proffesional very effeciant going into her court was like how i ran my crew when i could work a well oiled machine
this judge listened to my case she is very proffesional very effeciant going into her court was like how i ran my crew when i could work a well oiled machine
I applied for Social Security Disability September 2011, I worked 32 years. I have had Epilepsy since age 11. My epilepsy consist of Grand and petite Mal seizures, i have rheumatoid arthritis for the last 8 years in my spine and my hips. and i was diagnosed with spinal stenosis back in April of this year 2013 i have been taking epidural shots and I'm in a scooter wheel chair. My disability hearing was August 5th, 2013 location Social security administration building in Phoenix, AZ decision was decided October the 1st 2013. My case was finally closed December 24th, 2013. My case was denied by Claudia Rosen-Underwood. During my hearing the judge asked a Vocational rehab specialist can Tammy work 9 different jobs-each time the Vocation rehab Specialist said I was not able to work, and my Neurologist said I was no longer able to work and my family doctor said I was not able to work both doctors sent social security and my lawyer letters stating I'm no longer able to work. Claudia Rosen-Underwood stated in my social security denial letter she questioned both of my Doctors credibility! ..and she questioned my fathers, who is 78, credibility and said me and my Husband were Lying about my epilepsy and me of lying about me having a Stroke in 2005..and Doctor Shaw) sent me to have a. Cat Scan and MRI both test show Siezure Activity, Even though My Past Doctors and present Doctors have sent all my past medical records to show everything is 100% true
I applied for Social Security Disability September 2011, I worked 32 years. I have had Epilepsy since age 11. My epilepsy consist of Grand and petite Mal seizures, i have rheumatoid arthritis for the last 8 years in my spine and my hips. and i was diagnosed with spinal stenosis back in April of this year 2013 i have been taking epidural shots and I'm in a scooter wheel chair. My disability hearing was August 5th, 2013 location Social security administration building in Phoenix, AZ decision was decided October the 1st 2013. My case was finally closed December 24th, 2013. My case was denied by Claudia Rosen-Underwood. During my hearing the judge asked a Vocational rehab specialist can Tammy work 9 different jobs-each time the Vocation rehab Specialist said I was not able to work, and my Neurologist said I was no longer able to work and my family doctor said I was not able to work both doctors sent social security and my lawyer letters stating I'm no longer able to work. Claudia Rosen-Underwood stated in my social security denial letter she questioned both of my Doctors credibility! ..and she questioned my fathers, who is 78, credibility and said me and my Husband were Lying about my epilepsy and me of lying about me having a Stroke in 2005..and Doctor Shaw) sent me to have a. Cat Scan and MRI both test show Siezure Activity, Even though My Past Doctors and present Doctors have sent all my past medical records to show everything is 100% true
I applied for Social Security Disability September 2011, I worked 32 years. I have had Epilepsy since age 11. My epilepsy consist of Grand and petite Mal seizures, i have rheumatoid arthritis for the last 8 years in my spine and my hips. and i was diagnosed with spinal stenosis back in April of this year 2013 i have been taking epidural shots and I'm in a scooter wheel chair. My disability hearing was August 5th, 2013 location Social security administration building in Phoenix, AZ decision was decided October the 1st 2013. My case was finally closed December 24th, 2013. My case was denied by Claudia Rosen-Underwood. During my hearing the judge asked a Vocational rehab specialist can Tammy work 9 different jobs-each time the Vocation rehab Specialist said I was not able to work, and my Neurologist said I was no longer able to work and my family doctor said I was not able to work both doctors sent social security and my lawyer letters stating I'm no longer able to work. Claudia Rosen-Underwood stated in my social security denial letter she questioned both of my Doctors credibility! ..and she questioned my fathers, who is 78, credibility and said me and my Husband were Lying about my epilepsy and me of lying about me having a Stroke in 2005..and Doctor Shaw) sent me to have a. Cat Scan and MRI both test show Siezure Activity, Even though My Past Doctors and present Doctors have sent all my past medical records to show everything is 100% true
I have been seeing my doctors for over 15 years. One of my doctors sent in 4 letters explaining my condition and how it renders me "totally disabled". My other doctor sent in 2 letters saying that in his opinion I am "totally disabled". SSA sent me to 3 of their doctors and all 3 of them said I am "totally disabled". There's 34 medical exihibits in my SS file containing almost 900 pages of medical reports. 8 months after my hearing, I get a decision denying my case! In the decision, this so-called judge actually states that she did not give much, if any, weight to the letters from my doctors because she did not understand what the term "totally disabled" means! I've asked 7 of my grandson's friends if they know what "totally disabled" means and all 7 of them knew exactly what it means and they are all only in the forth grade. It is absurd that a well educated so-called disability judge who is probably being paid over $100,000 per year with tax payer dollars, doesn't know what "totally disabled" means. I don't even know how such a thing is possible. She also said that I didn't have any muscle atrophy but she never got closer than 15 feet to me and as far as I know she isn't a doctor so how could she say I don't have muscle atrophy? That woman doesn't know what totally disabled means but yet she can diagnose whether a person has muscle atrophy without ever examining me or seeing my body. My lawyer appealed my case but he told me that it would take the appeals court over a year to decide my appeal and, get this, if the appeals court agrees with my appeal, they are going to send my case back to the same judge and instruct her to hold another hearing and issue a new decision! Why would they send my case back to the same judge who doesn't even know what the term "totally disabled" means?My lawyer said that even after the appeals court sends my case back to the same judge that it will take this judge another year or more to hold another hearing. So, if my appeal is successful, I will have to wait more than two more years before I have another hearing and then when I do, I will have to go back in front of this same stupid woman so she can just deny my case again. This is so absurd that I cannot even believe it is happening for real. It's like something out of a weird movie or something. SSA is a rip off. I wish I had done like so many and just worked under the table. That my health and well being as well as my life in general is in the hands of such blatant incompetence and stupidity is for me, a death sentence. My own government is spending hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars to deny me from simply getting back my own money that I paid into SSA for the past 34 years is nothing short of a crime, especially when the person deciding my case has already admitted in writing that she doesn't understand a term that any 4th grader comprehends fully. What's really scary is that I am only one of millions of Americans who are subjected to this kind of inexcusable incompetence from our own government, a government we are paying for. The judge is no better than me. Her income comes from the same place my benefits would come from - the US taxpayer. Except, I paid for my benefits - it's my own money for God's sake!
I have been seeing my doctors for over 15 years. One of my doctors sent in 4 letters explaining my condition and how it renders me "totally disabled". My other doctor sent in 2 letters saying that in his opinion I am "totally disabled". SSA sent me to 3 of their doctors and all 3 of them said I am "totally disabled". There's 34 medical exihibits in my SS file containing almost 900 pages of medical reports. 8 months after my hearing, I get a decision denying my case! In the decision, this so-called judge actually states that she did not give much, if any, weight to the letters from my doctors because she did not understand what the term "totally disabled" means! I've asked 7 of my grandson's friends if they know what "totally disabled" means and all 7 of them knew exactly what it means and they are all only in the forth grade. It is absurd that a well educated so-called disability judge who is probably being paid over $100,000 per year with tax payer dollars, doesn't know what "totally disabled" means. I don't even know how such a thing is possible. She also said that I didn't have any muscle atrophy but she never got closer than 15 feet to me and as far as I know she isn't a doctor so how could she say I don't have muscle atrophy? That woman doesn't know what totally disabled means but yet she can diagnose whether a person has muscle atrophy without ever examining me or seeing my body. My lawyer appealed my case but he told me that it would take the appeals court over a year to decide my appeal and, get this, if the appeals court agrees with my appeal, they are going to send my case back to the same judge and instruct her to hold another hearing and issue a new decision! Why would they send my case back to the same judge who doesn't even know what the term "totally disabled" means?My lawyer said that even after the appeals court sends my case back to the same judge that it will take this judge another year or more to hold another hearing. So, if my appeal is successful, I will have to wait more than two more years before I have another hearing and then when I do, I will have to go back in front of this same stupid woman so she can just deny my case again. This is so absurd that I cannot even believe it is happening for real. It's like something out of a weird movie or something. SSA is a rip off. I wish I had done like so many and just worked under the table. That my health and well being as well as my life in general is in the hands of such blatant incompetence and stupidity is for me, a death sentence. My own government is spending hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars to deny me from simply getting back my own money that I paid into SSA for the past 34 years is nothing short of a crime, especially when the person deciding my case has already admitted in writing that she doesn't understand a term that any 4th grader comprehends fully. What's really scary is that I am only one of millions of Americans who are subjected to this kind of inexcusable incompetence from our own government, a government we are paying for. The judge is no better than me. Her income comes from the same place my benefits would come from - the US taxpayer. Except, I paid for my benefits - it's my own money for God's sake!
I have been seeing my doctors for over 15 years. One of my doctors sent in 4 letters explaining my condition and how it renders me "totally disabled". My other doctor sent in 2 letters saying that in his opinion I am "totally disabled". SSA sent me to 3 of their doctors and all 3 of them said I am "totally disabled". There's 34 medical exihibits in my SS file containing almost 900 pages of medical reports. 8 months after my hearing, I get a decision denying my case! In the decision, this so-called judge actually states that she did not give much, if any, weight to the letters from my doctors because she did not understand what the term "totally disabled" means! I've asked 7 of my grandson's friends if they know what "totally disabled" means and all 7 of them knew exactly what it means and they are all only in the forth grade. It is absurd that a well educated so-called disability judge who is probably being paid over $100,000 per year with tax payer dollars, doesn't know what "totally disabled" means. I don't even know how such a thing is possible. She also said that I didn't have any muscle atrophy but she never got closer than 15 feet to me and as far as I know she isn't a doctor so how could she say I don't have muscle atrophy? That woman doesn't know what totally disabled means but yet she can diagnose whether a person has muscle atrophy without ever examining me or seeing my body. My lawyer appealed my case but he told me that it would take the appeals court over a year to decide my appeal and, get this, if the appeals court agrees with my appeal, they are going to send my case back to the same judge and instruct her to hold another hearing and issue a new decision! Why would they send my case back to the same judge who doesn't even know what the term "totally disabled" means?My lawyer said that even after the appeals court sends my case back to the same judge that it will take this judge another year or more to hold another hearing. So, if my appeal is successful, I will have to wait more than two more years before I have another hearing and then when I do, I will have to go back in front of this same stupid woman so she can just deny my case again. This is so absurd that I cannot even believe it is happening for real. It's like something out of a weird movie or something. SSA is a rip off. I wish I had done like so many and just worked under the table. That my health and well being as well as my life in general is in the hands of such blatant incompetence and stupidity is for me, a death sentence. My own government is spending hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars to deny me from simply getting back my own money that I paid into SSA for the past 34 years is nothing short of a crime, especially when the person deciding my case has already admitted in writing that she doesn't understand a term that any 4th grader comprehends fully. What's really scary is that I am only one of millions of Americans who are subjected to this kind of inexcusable incompetence from our own government, a government we are paying for. The judge is no better than me. Her income comes from the same place my benefits would come from - the US taxpayer. Except, I paid for my benefits - it's my own money for God's sake!
My husband had his hearing on Sept. 22nd, 2017 we have not heard any thing as of yet. I feel as if we did our best now it's up to her and god so I'll leave this burden on you or lord in Jesus name amen. I can't rate a Judge on her efforts if no decision is made.
My husband had his hearing on Sept. 22nd, 2017 we have not heard any thing as of yet. I feel as if we did our best now it's up to her and god so I'll leave this burden on you or lord in Jesus name amen. I can't rate a Judge on her efforts if no decision is made.
My husband had his hearing on Sept. 22nd, 2017 we have not heard any thing as of yet. I feel as if we did our best now it's up to her and god so I'll leave this burden on you or lord in Jesus name amen. I can't rate a Judge on her efforts if no decision is made.
Judge Shave seems very nice. I do not approve of comments that she made about my case. She got information about me that when she blerted out a question about something I said to a Disability Psych. that did a interview with me was way not correct. I feel that she should not attack someone in that way. What was said is Depervation of Character and was way out of line. I would like to see that report and set the Record Straight. She took 3 different accurances and 3 different people and combined it into one incident with 1 person. Which leads me to believe that she was either fed the wrong information by someone that was not listening completely or she intentional did it. I would like to think she would not do that. She stated that she was not medicaly qualified to look at pictures that go with the report made by a Qualifed Phyician and Surgion who took the pictures of my insides, So my question would be how can you be qualified to do a Medical judgment as to if a person is truly in pain or disabled. I feel that judges that sit on this panel should have a medical background in order to get the right decision. Other wise this is a true injustice to the persons she or any other judge that has the authority to make the decision as to how much pain or the nature of the persons true disability.
Judge Shave seems very nice. I do not approve of comments that she made about my case. She got information about me that when she blerted out a question about something I said to a Disability Psych. that did a interview with me was way not correct. I feel that she should not attack someone in that way. What was said is Depervation of Character and was way out of line. I would like to see that report and set the Record Straight. She took 3 different accurances and 3 different people and combined it into one incident with 1 person. Which leads me to believe that she was either fed the wrong information by someone that was not listening completely or she intentional did it. I would like to think she would not do that. She stated that she was not medicaly qualified to look at pictures that go with the report made by a Qualifed Phyician and Surgion who took the pictures of my insides, So my question would be how can you be qualified to do a Medical judgment as to if a person is truly in pain or disabled. I feel that judges that sit on this panel should have a medical background in order to get the right decision. Other wise this is a true injustice to the persons she or any other judge that has the authority to make the decision as to how much pain or the nature of the persons true disability.
Judge Shave seems very nice. I do not approve of comments that she made about my case. She got information about me that when she blerted out a question about something I said to a Disability Psych. that did a interview with me was way not correct. I feel that she should not attack someone in that way. What was said is Depervation of Character and was way out of line. I would like to see that report and set the Record Straight. She took 3 different accurances and 3 different people and combined it into one incident with 1 person. Which leads me to believe that she was either fed the wrong information by someone that was not listening completely or she intentional did it. I would like to think she would not do that. She stated that she was not medicaly qualified to look at pictures that go with the report made by a Qualifed Phyician and Surgion who took the pictures of my insides, So my question would be how can you be qualified to do a Medical judgment as to if a person is truly in pain or disabled. I feel that judges that sit on this panel should have a medical background in order to get the right decision. Other wise this is a true injustice to the persons she or any other judge that has the authority to make the decision as to how much pain or the nature of the persons true disability.
Janice E Shave should not be working. During my case, she got information backwards. She picked and plucked information that suited her. She contradicted herself multiple times. She used information out of context and only that which suited her. To anyone who has to see her for a hearing, you have my deepest condolences, but it's not your fault she should have retired years ago.
Janice E Shave should not be working. During my case, she got information backwards. She picked and plucked information that suited her. She contradicted herself multiple times. She used information out of context and only that which suited her. To anyone who has to see her for a hearing, you have my deepest condolences, but it's not your fault she should have retired years ago.
Janice E Shave should not be working. During my case, she got information backwards. She picked and plucked information that suited her. She contradicted herself multiple times. She used information out of context and only that which suited her. To anyone who has to see her for a hearing, you have my deepest condolences, but it's not your fault she should have retired years ago.
viagra over the counter walmart buying viagra online over the counter viagra
viagra over the counter walmart buying viagra online over the counter viagra
Hello my name is Latasha Williams and I was at the hearing on July 3rd of last month and I don't remember what judge that I had but she was very nice and sweet she understood everything that I told her and she let me talk and everything else I just don't remember what judge that I had but I just hope that I can get good news from her soon bc even the witness was in there saying that I was unable to work bc I'm disabled so i hope I hear something back soon and I hope it's good news please contact me about the decisions that my judge said my number is 714-728-3040 or my email address is williamslatasha020@gmail.com I really want to hear from my judge if she has approved me or not
Hello my name is Latasha Williams and I was at the hearing on July 3rd of last month and I don't remember what judge that I had but she was very nice and sweet she understood everything that I told her and she let me talk and everything else I just don't remember what judge that I had but I just hope that I can get good news from her soon bc even the witness was in there saying that I was unable to work bc I'm disabled so i hope I hear something back soon and I hope it's good news please contact me about the decisions that my judge said my number is 714-728-3040 or my email address is williamslatasha020@gmail.com I really want to hear from my judge if she has approved me or not
Hello my name is Latasha Williams and I was at the hearing on July 3rd of last month and I don't remember what judge that I had but she was very nice and sweet she understood everything that I told her and she let me talk and everything else I just don't remember what judge that I had but I just hope that I can get good news from her soon bc even the witness was in there saying that I was unable to work bc I'm disabled so i hope I hear something back soon and I hope it's good news please contact me about the decisions that my judge said my number is 714-728-3040 or my email address is williamslatasha020@gmail.com I really want to hear from my judge if she has approved me or not
Although gruff sounding, he is an open minded and fair judge.
Although gruff sounding, he is an open minded and fair judge.
Although gruff sounding, he is an open minded and fair judge.
He has retired as of 2014. Good judge!
He has retired as of 2014. Good judge!
He has retired as of 2014. Good judge!
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
Hi judge this Debra Ann Baird I never received my minus SSI payment back. Over three and half years now.i have my ssa and only 188.00 of SSI for four years.she minus my payment of SSI. Only gave this payment.188.00.t o me for four and my ssa for 727.00. I have brain damage now.had brain cancer.ssc# 563373162 can take a look at my claim. Thank you Debra Ann Baird.
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
very little knowledge or sympathy for mental impairments. Very condescending and argumentative with claimant.
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
Very rude, patronizing, unethical and cold-hearted. Worst judge I have yet to app[ear before. Does not have any empathy or compassion whatsoever. Claimant is clearly disabled due to his mental disability of bi-polar and social anxiety. He overlooks the whole thing and finishes hearing swiftly denying him. If you appear before him for a mental disability, tough luck. Claimant is currently being evicted due to an unethical judge. He lacks knowledge in the mental health department. Why is he a SSI judge for the disabled?
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
appeal from law judge january 2.2014 disability benefits security income filed on may 13 2011 after these claims were denied i was born july 1. 1959 and i was 50 years old on allegd on set date june 30.2010 iam now 55 years old following severe impairments cevical and lumbar degenerative disc diabetes mellitus hypertension and depression high blood pressure the worst judge why is he a ssi judge for the disabled
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
I felt that he was very fair. When I walked out I felt like he wasn't looking for a reason to deny my claim but more so a reason to approve it. He was a bit standoffish but all in all I felt that he gave my case a fair look. The VE was another story. She was clueless rude and lacking in every area. But the Judge Wojciechowski was a respectable fair man, at least in my hearing.
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
This ******* judge is a ****** bigot!!!! **** him and i can't wait to see him in hell!!!0000000sssss across the board, give this **** to dysfunctional drug addict junkiees, and not help hard working american citzen!!
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
He already made a denial decision before he met me. He was so rude and disrespectful. I felt abused and disrespected. He is a villain
viagra from canada viagra without prescription goodrx viagra
viagra from canada viagra without prescription goodrx viagra
I was suggested this website by my cousin. Im not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my trouble. Youre incredible! Thanks!
Judge Stacy Zimmerman. I haven't received a decision yet but at the hearing she seemed informed and caring and intelligent...and above all seemed like she cared...so hoping for the best I'm getting worse every month and truly need my benefits asap...thank you.. M Wooll
Judge Stacy Zimmerman. I haven't received a decision yet but at the hearing she seemed informed and caring and intelligent...and above all seemed like she cared...so hoping for the best I'm getting worse every month and truly need my benefits asap...thank you.. M Wooll
Judge Stacy Zimmerman. I haven't received a decision yet but at the hearing she seemed informed and caring and intelligent...and above all seemed like she cared...so hoping for the best I'm getting worse every month and truly need my benefits asap...thank you.. M Wooll
Zimmerman went through my hearing so fast.I can't believe she wasn't prejudice.she claims I complain of back pain.But she counters it with early diagnosis notes from doctors.Which say mild tenderness.She gives alot of weight to the doctor who examined me(if you can call it that.) But gives my doctor's assessment no bearing at all.she didn't realize I had an incompetent attorney.Who said or did nothing in my behalf.And the whole time she had a look on her face of hidden anger of me trying to collect disability.She even wrote the determination in a condescending format.Did not consider my age or mental dysfunction due to pain.Here's the best one .That I can lift 50 pounds occasionally,and 25 pounds frequently.She's insane.Don't know how my white friends that I know,who you can't tell anything is wrong with them ,got disability.What I was trying to say about the doctor that so called examined me.Didn't do most of the tests.And I can prove it.
Zimmerman went through my hearing so fast.I can't believe she wasn't prejudice.she claims I complain of back pain.But she counters it with early diagnosis notes from doctors.Which say mild tenderness.She gives alot of weight to the doctor who examined me(if you can call it that.) But gives my doctor's assessment no bearing at all.she didn't realize I had an incompetent attorney.Who said or did nothing in my behalf.And the whole time she had a look on her face of hidden anger of me trying to collect disability.She even wrote the determination in a condescending format.Did not consider my age or mental dysfunction due to pain.Here's the best one .That I can lift 50 pounds occasionally,and 25 pounds frequently.She's insane.Don't know how my white friends that I know,who you can't tell anything is wrong with them ,got disability.What I was trying to say about the doctor that so called examined me.Didn't do most of the tests.And I can prove it.
Zimmerman went through my hearing so fast.I can't believe she wasn't prejudice.she claims I complain of back pain.But she counters it with early diagnosis notes from doctors.Which say mild tenderness.She gives alot of weight to the doctor who examined me(if you can call it that.) But gives my doctor's assessment no bearing at all.she didn't realize I had an incompetent attorney.Who said or did nothing in my behalf.And the whole time she had a look on her face of hidden anger of me trying to collect disability.She even wrote the determination in a condescending format.Did not consider my age or mental dysfunction due to pain.Here's the best one .That I can lift 50 pounds occasionally,and 25 pounds frequently.She's insane.Don't know how my white friends that I know,who you can't tell anything is wrong with them ,got disability.What I was trying to say about the doctor that so called examined me.Didn't do most of the tests.And I can prove it.
I really want to thank judge Zimmerman for approving me for my ssdi approval Iam so happy now I can buy what I need for myself so I don't have to worry any more I was so relieved when the person that worked for her called me yesterday and told me that my judge approved me for my ssdi my heart nearly stop it was beating very fast bc I was very nervous about it and now I get to buy whatever I need that's important to me so thank u very much for making my life more easier I couldn't be more happier
I really want to thank judge Zimmerman for approving me for my ssdi approval Iam so happy now I can buy what I need for myself so I don't have to worry any more I was so relieved when the person that worked for her called me yesterday and told me that my judge approved me for my ssdi my heart nearly stop it was beating very fast bc I was very nervous about it and now I get to buy whatever I need that's important to me so thank u very much for making my life more easier I couldn't be more happier
I really want to thank judge Zimmerman for approving me for my ssdi approval Iam so happy now I can buy what I need for myself so I don't have to worry any more I was so relieved when the person that worked for her called me yesterday and told me that my judge approved me for my ssdi my heart nearly stop it was beating very fast bc I was very nervous about it and now I get to buy whatever I need that's important to me so thank u very much for making my life more easier I couldn't be more happier
This judge is a liberal feminist with absolutely zero sympathy for Veterans I am a 100 percent service connected combat war veteran with mental and physical injuries sustained from my time in Iraq. I have major depressive disorder, anxiety, ptsd, depression and a whole list of other serious debilitating issues. You think a judge would be sympathetic to this but no. She denied my appeal and my last shot at getting disability. And they wonder why 24 veterans a day commit suicide. She is a coward with no heart. If you find yourself in the unfortunate position with her as your judge, be forewarned. She will deny you benefits and make your suffering permanent. She should be locked up for treason. I have no respect for her and I hope she get's what she deserves which is everlasting suffering in hell!
This judge is a liberal feminist with absolutely zero sympathy for Veterans I am a 100 percent service connected combat war veteran with mental and physical injuries sustained from my time in Iraq. I have major depressive disorder, anxiety, ptsd, depression and a whole list of other serious debilitating issues. You think a judge would be sympathetic to this but no. She denied my appeal and my last shot at getting disability. And they wonder why 24 veterans a day commit suicide. She is a coward with no heart. If you find yourself in the unfortunate position with her as your judge, be forewarned. She will deny you benefits and make your suffering permanent. She should be locked up for treason. I have no respect for her and I hope she get's what she deserves which is everlasting suffering in hell!
This judge is a liberal feminist with absolutely zero sympathy for Veterans I am a 100 percent service connected combat war veteran with mental and physical injuries sustained from my time in Iraq. I have major depressive disorder, anxiety, ptsd, depression and a whole list of other serious debilitating issues. You think a judge would be sympathetic to this but no. She denied my appeal and my last shot at getting disability. And they wonder why 24 veterans a day commit suicide. She is a coward with no heart. If you find yourself in the unfortunate position with her as your judge, be forewarned. She will deny you benefits and make your suffering permanent. She should be locked up for treason. I have no respect for her and I hope she get's what she deserves which is everlasting suffering in hell!
buy generic 100mg viagra online viagra without prescription is there a generic for viagra
buy generic 100mg viagra online viagra without prescription is there a generic for viagra